Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The ω-categorification of Algebraic Theories

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.07191 v3 pith:O5SNYNR2 submitted 2020-06-11 math.CT

The ω-categorification of Algebraic Theories

classification math.CT
keywords globularomegaalgebrasoperadstheorywhosealgebraiccategory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Batanin and Leinster's work on globular operads has provided one of many potential defnitions of a weak $\omega$-category. Through the language of globular operads they construct a monad whose algebras encode weak $\omega$-categories. The purpose of this work is to show how to construct a similar monad which will allow us to formulate weak $\omega$-categorifications of any equational algebraic theory. We first review the classical theory of operads and PROs. We then present how Leinster's globular operads can be extended to a theory of globular PROs via categorical enrichment over the category of collections. It is then shown how a process called globularization allows us to construct from a classical PRO P a globular PRO whose algebras are those algebras for P which are internal to the category of strict $\omega$-categories and strict $\omega$-functors. Leinster's notion of a contraction structure on a globular operad is then extended to this setting of globular PROs in order to build a monad whose algebras are weakenings of the globularization of the classica PRO P. Among these weakenings is the initial weakining whose algebras are by construction the fully weakened $\omega$-categorifications of the algebraic theory encoded by P.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Controlled theories, categorification, and homotopification

    math.CT 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Controlled theories yield functorial Lawvere 2-theories and simplicial Lawvere theories, producing a new model of ∞-groups and a candidate for infinite loop spaces.

  2. Controlled theories, categorification, and homotopification

    math.CT 2026-07 reject novelty 7.0

    Controlled theories are claimed to yield functorial categorifications and homotopifications, but the central 'strong augmentation' theorem is false for the paper's main examples and Proposition 6.18 asserts Ωmon(n,1) ...

  3. Algebraic coherators, controlled theories, and Grothendieck realizations

    math.CT 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    Algebraic coherators and Grothendieck realizations produce infinity-Lawvere theories for monoidal and Picard infinity-groupoids; a generalized pushout conjecture would yield semi-model structures and the Homotopy Hypothesis.