Dark Matter Signatures in Black Hole Thermodynamics and Information Recovery

Brahim Asfour; Taoufik Ouali; Yahya Ladghami

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 54 references

Dark Matter Signatures in Black Hole Thermodynamics and Information Recovery

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Perfect-fluid dark matter accelerates information recovery from evaporating black holes.

desk verdict The island-formula part is the least of this paper's problems; the PFDM metric has a sign inconsistency inside the authors' own field equations, and fixing it flips the headline claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02767 v1 pith:O6LX7NBF submitted 2026-08-03 gr-qc

Yahya Ladghami , Brahim Asfour , Taoufik Ouali This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C45 PACS 04.70.Dy95.35.+d

keywords blackholeinformationparadoxislandformulaPagecurvetimeperfectfluiddarkmatterHawkingtemperatureSchwarzschildReissner-Nordström

topics Dark Matter

open problems Dark Matter

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a black hole sitting inside a perfect-fluid dark matter halo evaporates faster and begins to return information to its Hawking radiation sooner than an isolated black hole. The key step is the island formula: once a region inside the horizon is counted into the radiation's entanglement structure, the radiation entropy stops growing and saturates at twice the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, reproducing the Page curve. This holds for both Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordström black holes. The Page time is derived as $t_P = 3 r_h^2/(C T)$, so the onset of information recovery is set by the horizon radius and the Hawking temperature, making it a possible probe of the surrounding dark matter.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the metric for a static, spherically symmetric black hole surrounded by a perfect fluid dark matter, $$f(r) = 1 - \frac{2M}{r} + \frac{$Q^{2}$}{$r^{2}$} + \frac{\$\lambda$}{r}\ln\left(\frac{r}{\$\lambda$}\right),$$ where $\lambda$ is the dark matter density parameter. The argument then rides on two standard tools: the Bekenstein-Hawking area law for the entropy, which stays $S = \pi r_h^2$, and the island formula, whose extremization produces the late-time saturation at $2S_{\rm BH}$. The Page time $t_P = 3 r_h^2/(C T)$ carries the mechanism because $\lambda$ enters through the Hawking temperature, turning dark matter density into a control knob for information recovery.

What would settle it

Re-derive the same thermodynamic quantities and Page time using a different, observationally motivated dark matter density profile, such as a cuspy halo rather than the perfect fluid with $P_\theta = \lambda/(16\pi r^3)$. If the logarithmic term in the metric disappears, so do the paper's predicted temperature enhancement and Page-time shortening.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the information-loss verdict changes when a dark-matter environment is included: for Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordström black holes surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter, the island prescription makes the late-time entanglement entropy of Hawking radiation saturate at twice the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, reproducing the Page curve and restoring unitary information recovery. Dark matter raises the Hawking temperature through a positive contribution proportional to $\lambda$, so black holes in a denser fluid emit faster, have shorter lifetimes, and reach the Page time earlier. The Page time is fixed by thermodynamics through $t_P = 3 r_h^2/(C T)$, which is the paper's stated correspondence between thermodynamics and information recovery.

Load-bearing premise

The entire chain of predictions rests on the adopted metric for a black hole embedded in a perfect-fluid dark matter, $f(r) = 1 - 2M/r + Q^2/r^2 + (\lambda/r)\ln(r/\lambda)$, taken from earlier work without independent derivation; if the real dark matter distribution around a black hole is not this fluid, the temperature rise, shorter lifetime, and reduced Page time would all change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the central claim is right, a black hole in a dark-matter-rich environment reaches the onset of information recovery earlier than an isolated black hole of the same horizon radius.
Dark matter does not change the qualitative phase structure: Schwarzschild black holes remain thermodynamically unstable, and Reissner-Nordström black holes keep their stable small / unstable large black-hole split.
The late-time saturation at $2S_{\rm BH}$ reproduces the Page curve in both families, so the information paradox is resolved in these dark-matter backgrounds exactly as it is for isolated black holes.
Because the Page time is set by the Hawking temperature and horizon radius, the paper's results make the information-recovery time a diagnostic of the local dark matter density around a black hole.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same island analysis performed here for static, spherically symmetric solutions should extend to rotating black holes surrounded by the same perfect fluid; rotation would add a frame-dragging term to the metric and likely shift the Page time further, but that extension is not made in this paper.
If $\lambda$ is promoted to a running coupling rather than a fixed fluid parameter, the first law used here would need a renormalization-group correction, and the simple $t_P \propto 1/T$ relation would acquire scale dependence.
The paper treats the dark matter parameter as a thermodynamic variable with its own potential $\Psi$; a direct observational check would be to compare the predicted temperature boost for small black holes in dense halos with X-ray or gravitational-wave constraints on black hole masses in galactic centers.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: the central claim fails on a sign. In Sec. 2, the authors state a perfect-fluid dark-matter stress tensor with positive energy density ρ = λ/(8πr^3), then write Eq. (7) with +λ/r^3 and solve it to Eq. (9) with f = 1 − 2M/r + Q^2/r^2 + (λ/r) ln(r/λ). Substitute that f into G^t_t = f′/r + (f−1)/r^2 and you get −Q^2/r^4 + λ/r^3, which is what a negative energy density −λ/(8πr^3) would give, not the stated positive one. The stress-test note is right: the metric they actually solve is the negative-density one. If you use the correct positive-density metric, the Hawking temperature becomes T = (r0 − λ)/(4πr0^2), so λ lowers T, lengthens evaporation, and increases the Page time. The abstract's claim that dark matter accelerates evaporation and information recovery is reversed by the paper's own equations. That is not a philosophical disagreement; it is an internal inconsistency in Sec. 2.

There is honest work here too. This is the first substitution of the PFDM metric into the island formula, and the thermodynamic analysis is mostly standard and correct: entropy stays area-law, Schwarzschild remains unstable, RN keeps its small/large transition, and there is no critical phenomenon. The presentation is readable, and the relevant island and PFDM references are in place. The island extremization algebra is skipped — Eq. (44) to S = 2S_BH is presented as a leap — but that saturation is the known Schwarzschild/RN result and can be repaired. The RN Page time in Eq. (58) is also wrong: combining Eqs. (20) and (56) gives 12π r_+^5/[C(r_+(r_++λ) − Q^2)], not the displayed 48π^2 r_+^5/[...]; C is dropped and there is an extra factor of 4π. The 'thermodynamics-information correspondence' in Sec. 6 is mostly a restatement of the Page time definition as the crossing of the two entropy branches, not an independent check.

If the sign is fixed, this becomes a modest, publishable application paper for a specialist gr-qc venue, provided the island derivation is written out. As submitted, the headline is contradicted by the authors' own equations. I would not send it to a referee in this form; I would return it with the sign and algebra errors and invite resubmission. So: serious thinker? no — the internal contradiction is load-bearing. Cite? no. Reading group? no.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordström black holes surrounded by a perfect-fluid dark matter (PFDM) background, using the metric f(r)=1-2M/r+Q^2/r^2+(λ/r)ln(r/λ). It computes the Hawking temperature, entropy, heat capacity, phase structure, and evaporation lifetime, and then applies the island formula to compute the entanglement entropy of Hawking radiation, obtaining a Page curve that saturates at twice the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy. The Page time is expressed in terms of the horizon radius and the Hawking temperature, and the paper claims that increasing the dark matter parameter λ raises the temperature, shortens the black hole lifetime, and reduces the Page time, thereby accelerating information recovery for both Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordström black holes. The paper further claims a direct correspondence between black hole thermodynamics and information recovery.

Significance. If the results held, they would provide a concrete environmental signature by linking a dark-matter parameter to black hole thermodynamics and to the time at which information recovery begins. The manuscript applies a standard and well-established island-formula framework to a modified metric and reproduces the expected qualitative Page-curve behavior, which is a useful consistency exercise. However, the central quantitative claims rest on a sign convention in the PFDM stress tensor that is internally inconsistent, and the Reissner-Nordström Page-time formula contains an algebraic error. The derivation from the generalized entropy to the saturation value S=2S_BH is asserted rather than shown, and the claimed thermodynamics-information correspondence is largely definitional. The paper would be of interest if the sign inconsistency were resolved in a physically consistent way and the quantitative results redone, but in its current form the headline conclusions are not supported by the paper's own equations.

major comments (4)

[Sec. 2, Eqs. (6)-(9)] Equations (7) and (8) are mutually inconsistent with the stated stress tensor and metric. Substituting f(r) from Eq. (9) into Eq. (7) gives an identity, but substituting it into Eq. (8) gives G^θ_θ = Q^2/r^4 - λ/(2r^3), not Q^2/r^4 + λ/(2r^3); conversely, the metric that satisfies Eq. (8) does not satisfy Eq. (7). No metric of the considered form solves both field equations as written. If one requires positivity of the energy density ρ=λ/(8πr^3) as stated in Eq. (6), the metric becomes f(r)=1-2M/r+Q^2/r^2-(λ/r)ln(r/λ), which yields T=(r0-λ)/(4πr0^2) in Eq. (11). With this sign, increasing λ lowers the Hawking temperature, lengthens the evaporation time in Eq. (18), and increases the Page time in Eq. (57), reversing the abstract's and Secs. 3, 6, and 7 central claim that dark matter accelerates evaporation and information recovery. This is a load-bearing internal inconsistency, not a matter of convention.
[Sec. 6.2, Eq. (58)] Equation (58) does not follow from Eqs. (20) and (56). Combining t_P=3r_+^2/(C T_RN) with T_RN=[r_+(r_++λ)-Q^2]/(4πr_+^3) gives t_P = 12π r_+^5/[C(r_+(r_++λ)-Q^2)], not the expression displayed in Eq. (58). The published formula is missing the central charge C and contains an extra factor of 4π. Consequently, Fig. 10 and the quantitative Reissner-Nordström Page-time conclusions are not supported by the paper's own equations.
[Sec. 5.1.2, Eqs. (44)-(51)] The passage from the generalized entropy in Eq. (44) to the claimed saturation value S(R)=2S_BH is not derived. Equation (50) still contains a C-dependent logarithmic term and an O(ϵ^2) correction, and the text does not specify the limit (for example b→∞ with C held fixed, or some hierarchy between C and r0^2) that makes these terms negligible relative to 2πr0^2. Since the value 2S_BH is the anchor for the Page-time calculation, this is a gap in the central island-formula argument. Section 5.2 simply asserts the same result for Reissner-Nordström black holes without showing the extremization or the limit.
[Secs. 5-6] The claimed correspondence between thermodynamics and information recovery is largely definitional. The Page time t_P=3r_h^2/(C T) is obtained by equating the late-time no-island entropy (C/3)κt with the island entropy 2S_BH and then using κ=2πT. Thus the relation t_P∝1/(C T) is built into the definition of the Page time in this construction rather than derived from an independent principle. This does not invalidate the computation, but it should be presented as a consistency statement, not as a new correspondence between thermodynamics and information recovery.

minor comments (6)

[Secs. 5-7] The phrase 'perfect fluid dark matte' appears repeatedly (for example in Secs. 5.1, 6.1, and 7) and should read 'perfect fluid dark matter'.
[Secs. 3-5] The symbol C is used for the heat capacity in Secs. 3 and 4 and for the CFT central charge in Sec. 5. This clash is confusing and should be removed, for example by using c for the central charge or C_Q for the heat capacity.
[Sec. 5.1.2, Eq. (50)] Equation (50) uses the symbol k for the surface gravity after κ was introduced in Eq. (31) and used throughout Sec. 5; the notation should be made consistent.
[Sec. 3, Eq. (18)] The evaporation lifetime in Eq. (18) is presented without derivation, and its λ→0 limit should reduce to the standard Schwarzschild result; the logarithmic terms and the role of σ should be clarified.
[Fig. 10 caption] The caption contains the typo 'corrpondandce'; it should read 'correspondence'.
[References] Reference [2] appears to cite a globular-cluster paper rather than the Event Horizon Telescope M87 paper referenced in the introduction; the citation should be checked.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Page-time thermodynamic 'correspondence' is definitional; core dark-matter temperature effect is external input.

self definitional [Sec. 5.1.2, Eq. (52); Sec. 6, Eqs. (57)-(58)]
"Through the equality between the entanglement entropy without and with an island at the Page time, we find the expression of the Page time as follows tP = 3r2 0/CT ,(52) ... We observe that the Page time is directly related to the Hawking temperature and the event horizon of the black hole. This means that there is a correspondence between black hole thermodynamics and information recovery, which we will discuss in more detail in the next section."

The Page time is defined as the time at which the no-island entanglement entropy (slope C/(3κ), with κ = 2πT) equals the island entropy (2S_BH = 2πr0^2). Solving that equality for t gives an expression that depends on T and r0 by construction. The paper then presents this algebraic relation as a discovered 'correspondence between black hole thermodynamics and information recovery.' The functional dependence on T and r0 is thus a restatement of the entropy calculation, not an independent principle. The λ-dependence of the conclusion is still physical because it enters through the external metric input T(λ), so the circularity is partial and confined to the interpretation of this derived formula.

full rationale

Aside from the definitional Page-time step, the paper's derivation chain is self-contained: the metric is taken from Refs [52,53] (not the authors' own work), the thermodynamics follows from f(r0)=0 and f'(r0), the entropy integral reproduces the area law, and the island entropy calculation follows the standard crossing/minimization used in the cited literature. The dark-matter effect on temperature and Page time is an external input through the metric parameter λ, not a quantity fitted to the paper's outputs. The apparent sign inconsistency between the stress tensor in Eqs. (5)-(8) and the plus-sign metric in Eq. (9) is a correctness issue, not a circularity, and therefore does not raise the circularity score. No load-bearing self-citation chain or fitted-input-as-prediction pattern was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper relies entirely on prior inputs: the PFDM metric and stress tensor from Refs. [52,53], the island formula from Ref. [33], the s-wave 2D CFT reduction, and the near-horizon island approximation from Ref. [34]. It also treats λ as a thermodynamic variable and assumes blackbody evaporation. These are all domain assumptions, not derived here. No free parameters are fitted; λ, C, and σ are inputs or conventions.

free parameters (3)

λ (dark matter parameter)
Appears in the metric as the coefficient of the logarithmic term; varied by hand in Figures 1-4, 9, and 10 to illustrate effects. The paper does not fit it to data.
C (CFT central charge)
Central charge of the effective 2D CFT used in the island formula; appears in the entanglement entropy and Page time, but is never fixed numerically. The inconsistency in Eq. (58) comes from this constant being dropped.
σ (Stefan-Boltzmann constant) = 1 (Fig. 2)
Set to unity in the evaporation lifetime plot; in natural units with c = G = hbar = k_B = 1, σ has a definite value only after specifying the radiation species, so setting σ = 1 is a convention.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption The perfect-fluid-dark-matter metric f(r) = 1 - 2M/r + Q^2/r^2 + (λ/r) ln(r/λ) is the correct spacetime.
The metric (Eq. 9) is imported from Refs [52,53] and is the starting point for all thermodynamic and island calculations.
domain assumption The dark matter energy-momentum tensor has ρ = -P_r = λ/(8π r^3), P_θ = P_φ = λ/(16π r^3).
The stress tensor (Eqs. 5-6) is assumed without derivation and defines the 'perfect fluid dark matter' model.
domain assumption The island formula S(R) = min ext(Area(∂I)/4 + S_Bulk(R∪I)) correctly computes the fine-grained entropy of Hawking radiation.
Equation (30) is assumed to be the correct prescription, following Ref. [33], without independent justification in this paper.
domain assumption The 4D entanglement entropy can be computed via an s-wave reduction to a 2D CFT with central charge C and conformal factor W(r)^2 = f(r) e^{2κ r*}/κ^2.
Equations (33)-(34) and the entropy formula (36) rely on this standard but non-trivial reduction from the island literature.
domain assumption The island lies close to the event horizon, a = r0 + ε^2 r0, with ε small, and the tortoise coordinate at the island satisfies r*(a) = (1/κ) ln ε.
Equations (45)-(47) impose the near-horizon approximation without re-verifying that this configuration extremizes the generalized entropy for the PFDM background.
domain assumption The dark matter parameter λ is an independent thermodynamic variable in the first law, dM = T dS + Ψ dλ.
Equations (13) and (23) extend the first law with a Ψ dλ term; this is a modeling choice common in extended thermodynamics, not derived in the paper.
domain assumption Black hole evaporation follows the blackbody law dM/dt = -σ A T^4.
Equation (17) is assumed for computing black hole lifetimes, with the Stefan-Boltzmann constant σ left as a free convention.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dark Matter Signatures in Black Hole Thermodynamics and Information Recovery." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O6LX7NBF

@misc{pith2026260802767,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dark Matter Signatures in Black Hole Thermodynamics and Information Recovery},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O6LX7NBF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02767}
}

read the original abstract

In this paper, we investigate the thermodynamic properties and information recovery of Schwarzschild and Reissner--Nordstr"om black holes surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter. We show that, while the Bekenstein--Hawking entropy remains unchanged, dark matter significantly modifies the Hawking temperature by introducing a positive contribution that enhances thermal effects, particularly for small black holes. We find that the phase structure is preserved: Schwarzschild black holes remain unstable, whereas Reissner--Nordstr"om black holes exhibit the standard small/large black hole transition, in which small black holes are stable and large black holes are unstable. Furthermore, we demonstrate that dark matter accelerates Hawking evaporation, thereby reducing black hole lifetimes. We further investigate the black hole information loss paradox using the island formula. In the absence of islands, the entanglement entropy of Hawking radiation grows linearly with time and diverges at late times, thereby violating unitarity. By including island contributions, the entanglement entropy of Hawking radiation saturates at twice the Bekenstein--Hawking entropy, reproducing the Page curve and restoring information recovery for both Schwarzschild and Reissner--Nordstr"om black holes surrounded by perfect fluid dark matter. We derive analytical expressions for the Page time and demonstrate that it is directly determined by the thermodynamic parameters of the black hole. Furthermore, we establish a correspondence between thermodynamics and information recovery by showing that the Page time is governed by the Hawking temperature and the event horizon. Finally, we find that the presence of dark matter reduces the Page time, thereby accelerating information recovery.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02767 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Lifetime of black holes surrounded by dark matter as a function of the dark matter parameter, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Hawking temperature of RN black holes surrounded by dark matter for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (7 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Heat capacity curves of RN black holes for different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Penrose diagram of a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matte [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Penrose diagram of a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matte with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Penrose diagram of a RN black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matte without an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Penrose diagram of a RN black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark matte with an island. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Page time as a function of the event horizon radius for Schwarzschild black holes surrounded [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Page time as a function of the event horizon radius for RN black holes surrounded by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

[1]

B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) no.6, 061102 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 [arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]]

arXiv 2016
[2]

C. R. Mann, H. Richer, J. Heyl, J. Anderson, J. Kalirai, I. Caiazzo, S. M¨ ohle, A. Knee and H. Baumgardt, Astrophys. J.875(2019) no.1, 1 doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0e6d [arXiv:1807.03307 [astro-ph.GA]]

arXiv 2019
[3]

Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], Astrophys

K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], Astrophys. J. Lett.875(2019) no.1, L5 doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0f43 [arXiv:1906.11242 [astro-ph.GA]]

arXiv 2019
[4]

S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975), 199-220 Commun. Math. Phys.46(1976), 206 doi:10.1007/BF02345020 17

doi:10.1007/bf02345020 1975
[5]

Black holes and entropy,

J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,” Phys. Rev. D7(1973), 2333-2346

1973
[6]

The Four laws of black hole mechanics,

J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter and S. W. Hawking, “The Four laws of black hole mechanics,” Commun. Math. Phys.31(1973), 161-170

1973
[7]

Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with Lambda,

D. Kubiznak, R. B. Mann and M. Teo, “Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with Lambda,” Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) no.6, 063001 [arXiv:1608.06147 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2017
[8]

S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, Commun. Math. Phys.87(1983), 577 doi:10.1007/BF01208266

doi:10.1007/bf01208266 1983

Show all 54 references

[9]

M. Eune, W. Kim and S. H. Yi, JHEP03(2013), 020 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2013)020 [arXiv:1301.0395 [gr-qc]]

2013 arXiv
[10]

Li and J

R. Li and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) no.2, 024085 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.024085

2020 doi
[11]

Barrow entropy and AdS black holes in RPS thermodynamics,

Y. Ladghami, B. Asfour, A. Bouali, A. Errahmani and T. Ouali, “Barrow entropy and AdS black holes in RPS thermodynamics,” Phys. Dark Univ.44(2024), 101470 [arXiv:2403.08991 [hep-th]]

2024 arXiv
[12]

Restricted phase space thermodynamics for AdS black holes via holog- raphy,

G. Zeyuan and L. Zhao, “Restricted phase space thermodynamics for AdS black holes via holog- raphy,” Class. Quant. Grav.39(2022) no.7, 075019 [arXiv:2112.02386 [gr-qc]]

2022 arXiv
[13]

4D-EGB black holes in RPS thermodynamics,

Y. Ladghami, B. Asfour, A. Bouali, A. Errahmani and T. Ouali, “4D-EGB black holes in RPS thermodynamics,” Phys. Dark Univ.41(2023), 101261 [arXiv:2303.00604 [hep-th]]

2023 arXiv
[14]

Extended Phase Space Thermodynamics for Black Holes in a Cavity,

P. Wang, H. Wu, H. Yang and F. Yao, “Extended Phase Space Thermodynamics for Black Holes in a Cavity,” JHEP09(2020), 154 [arXiv:2006.14349 [gr-qc]]

2020 arXiv
[15]

Black holes thermodynamics with CFT re-scaling,

Y. Ladghami and T. Ouali, “Black holes thermodynamics with CFT re-scaling,” Phys. Dark Univ. 44(2024), 101471 [arXiv:2402.15913 [hep-th]]

2024 arXiv
[16]

Extended thermodynamics of the bumblebee black holes,

Z. F. Mai, R. Xu, D. Liang and L. Shao, “Extended thermodynamics of the bumblebee black holes,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.2, 024004 [arXiv:2304.08030 [gr-qc]]

2023 arXiv
[17]

Ladghami, B

Y. Ladghami, B. Asfour, A. Bouali, A. Errahmani and T. Ouali, Phys. Lett. B864(2025), 139418

2025
[18]

Holographic thermodynamics of BTZ black holes and Tsallis entropy,

Y. Ladghami, B. Asfour, A. Bouali, T. Ouali and G. Mustafa, “Holographic thermodynamics of BTZ black holes and Tsallis entropy,” Phys. Dark Univ.46(2024), 101724 [arXiv:2410.22198 [hep-th]]

2024 arXiv
[19]

Extended phase space thermodynamics and P-V criticality of black holes with a nonlinear source,

S. H. Hendi and M. H. Vahidinia, “Extended phase space thermodynamics and P-V criticality of black holes with a nonlinear source,” Phys. Rev. D88(2013) no.8, 084045 [arXiv:1212.6128 [hep-th]]

2013 arXiv
[20]

Holographic Thermodynamics of Higher-Dimensional AdS Black Holes with CFT Rescaling,

Y. Ladghami and T. Ouali, “Holographic Thermodynamics of Higher-Dimensional AdS Black Holes with CFT Rescaling,” Universe11(2025) no.10, 337 [arXiv:2510.05700 [hep-th]]

2025
[21]

Signature of the Van der Waals like small-large charged AdS black hole phase transition in quasinormal modes,

Y. Liu, D. C. Zou and B. Wang, “Signature of the Van der Waals like small-large charged AdS black hole phase transition in quasinormal modes,” JHEP09(2014), 179 [arXiv:1405.2644 [hep-th]]

2014 arXiv
[22]

Van der Waals like behavior of topo- logical AdS black holes in massive gravity,

S. H. Hendi, R. B. Mann, S. Panahiyan and B. Eslam Panah, “Van der Waals like behavior of topo- logical AdS black holes in massive gravity,” Phys. Rev. D95(2017) no.2, 021501 [arXiv:1702.00432 [gr-qc]]

2017 arXiv
[23]

Thermal stability and tunneling radiation in Van der Waals black hole,

A. Ditta, X. Tiecheng, R. Ali and G. Mustafa, “Thermal stability and tunneling radiation in Van der Waals black hole,” Nucl. Phys. B994(2023), 116287

2023
[24]

P-V criticality of charged AdS black holes,

D. Kubiznak and R. B. Mann, “P-V criticality of charged AdS black holes,” JHEP07(2012), 033 [arXiv:1205.0559 [hep-th]]

2012 arXiv
[25]

P-V criticality of logarithm-corrected dyonic charged AdS black holes,

J. Sadeghi, B. Pourhassan and M. Rostami, “P-V criticality of logarithm-corrected dyonic charged AdS black holes,” Phys. Rev. D94(2016) no.6, 064006 [arXiv:1605.03458 [gr-qc]]

2016 arXiv
[26]

Y. Feng, A. Ashraf, S. Mumtaz, S. K. Maurya, G. Mustafa and F. Atamurotov, JHEAp43(2024), 158-170 doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2024.07.003 18

2024 doi
[27]

Thermodynamically stable phases of asymptotically flat Lovelock black holes,

J. Wu and R. B. Mann, “Thermodynamically stable phases of asymptotically flat Lovelock black holes,” Class. Quant. Grav.40(2023) no.14, 145009 [arXiv:2212.08673 [hep-th]]

2023 arXiv
[28]

Multicritical phenomena of Reissner-Nordstrom anti-de Sitter black holes,

X. N. Wu, “Multicritical phenomena of Reissner-Nordstrom anti-de Sitter black holes,” Phys. Rev. D62(2000), 124023

2000
[29]

Lessons from the information paradox,

S. Raju, “Lessons from the information paradox,” Phys. Rept.943(2022), 1-80 [arXiv:2012.05770 [hep-th]]

2022 arXiv
[30]

Aghanimet al.[Planck], Astron

N. Aghanimet al.[Planck], Astron. Astrophys.641(2020), A6 [erratum: Astron. Astrophys.652 (2021), C4] doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 [arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]]

2020 arXiv
[31]

S. D. Mathur, Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009), 224001 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/22/224001 [arXiv:0909.1038 [hep-th]]

2009 arXiv
[32]

Information in black hole radiation,

D. N. Page, “Information in black hole radiation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.71(1993), 3743-3746 [arXiv:hep-th/9306083 [hep-th]]

1993 arXiv
[33]

The entropy of Hawking radiation,

A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, “The entropy of Hawking radiation,” Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) no.3, 035002 [arXiv:2006.06872 [hep-th]]

2021 arXiv
[34]

Islands in Schwarzschild black holes,

K. Hashimoto, N. Iizuka and Y. Matsuo, “Islands in Schwarzschild black holes,” JHEP06(2020), 085 [arXiv:2004.05863 [hep-th]]

2020 arXiv
[35]

Unitary constraints on semiclassical Schwarzschild black holes in the presence of island,

D. H. Du, W. C. Gan, F. W. Shu and J. R. Sun, “Unitary constraints on semiclassical Schwarzschild black holes in the presence of island,” Phys. Rev. D107(2023) no.2, 026005 [arXiv:2206.10339 [hep-th]]

2023 arXiv
[36]

Island in charged black holes,

Y. Ling, Y. Liu and Z. Y. Xian, “Island in charged black holes,” JHEP03(2021), 251

2021
[37]

Island, Page curve, and superradiance of rotating BTZ black holes,

M. H. Yu, C. Y. Lu, X. H. Ge and S. J. Sin, “Island, Page curve, and superradiance of rotating BTZ black holes,” Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no.6, 066009 [arXiv:2112.14361 [hep-th]]

2022 arXiv
[38]

Ladghami, B

Y. Ladghami, B. Asfour, F. S. N. Lobo and T. Ouali, Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) no.5, 526 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15795-w [arXiv:2603.12524 [gr-qc]]

2026 arXiv
[39]

Rahaman, K

F. Rahaman, K. K. Nandi, A. Bhadra, M. Kalam and K. Chakraborty, Phys. Lett. B694(2011), 10-15 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.09.038 [arXiv:1009.3572 [gr-qc]]

2011 arXiv
[40]

Z. Xu, X. Hou, J. Wang and Y. Liao, Adv. High Energy Phys.2019(2019), 2434390 doi:10.1155/2019/2434390 [arXiv:1610.05454 [gr-qc]]

2019 arXiv
[41]

K. J. He, G. P. Li, C. Y. Yang and X. X. Zeng, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no.6, 662 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14391-8 [arXiv:2411.11680 [astro-ph.HE]]

2025 arXiv
[42]

Atamurotov, F

F. Atamurotov, F. Sarikulov, S. G. Ghosh and G. Mustafa, Phys. Dark Univ.46(2024), 101625 doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101625

2024
[43]

Yang, Phys

X. Yang, Phys. Dark Univ.44(2024), 101467 doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101467

2024
[44]

Anjum, M

A. Anjum, M. Afrin and S. G. Ghosh, Phys. Dark Univ.40(2023), 101195 doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101195 [arXiv:2301.06373 [gr-qc]]

2023
[45]

A. Das, A. Saha and S. Gangopadhyay, Class. Quant. Grav.39(2022) no.7, 075005 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac50ed [arXiv:2110.11704 [gr-qc]]

2022 arXiv
[46]

Rizwan and K

M. Rizwan and K. Jusufi, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) no.10, 944 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023- 12126-1 [arXiv:2310.15182 [gr-qc]]

2023 arXiv
[47]

Rizwan, M

M. Rizwan, M. Jamil and M. Z. A. Moughal, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no.3, 359 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14070-8 [arXiv:2501.04739 [gr-qc]]

2025 arXiv
[48]

D. V. Singh, S. Upadhyay, Y. Myrzakulov, K. Myrzakulov, B. Singh and M. Kumar, Nucl. Phys. B1016(2025), 116915 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.116915 19

2025
[49]

R. H. Ali and X. M. Kuang, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no.10, 1131 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025- 14816-4

2025 doi
[50]

Song and C

J. Song and C. Liu, Mod. Phys. Lett. A40(2025) no.23, 2550078 doi:10.1142/S0217732325500786

2025 doi
[51]

S. Y. Lin, M. H. Yu, X. H. Ge and L. J. Tian, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.4, 4 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.046008 [arXiv:2405.06873 [hep-th]]

2024 arXiv
[52]

A. Das, A. Saha and S. Gangopadhyay, Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) no.6, 065015 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abd95b [arXiv:2009.03644 [gr-qc]]

2021 arXiv
[53]

X. J. Gao, X. k. Yan, Y. Yin and Y. P. Hu, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) no.4, 281 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11414-0 [arXiv:2303.00190 [gr-qc]]

2023 arXiv
[54]

Petridis and A

A. Petridis and A. G. Shalaby, Phys. Lett. B836(2023), 137616 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137616 20

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) no.6, 061102 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 [arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]]

arXiv 2016

[2] [2]

C. R. Mann, H. Richer, J. Heyl, J. Anderson, J. Kalirai, I. Caiazzo, S. M¨ ohle, A. Knee and H. Baumgardt, Astrophys. J.875(2019) no.1, 1 doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0e6d [arXiv:1807.03307 [astro-ph.GA]]

arXiv 2019

[3] [3]

Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], Astrophys

K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], Astrophys. J. Lett.875(2019) no.1, L5 doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0f43 [arXiv:1906.11242 [astro-ph.GA]]

arXiv 2019

[4] [4]

S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975), 199-220 Commun. Math. Phys.46(1976), 206 doi:10.1007/BF02345020 17

doi:10.1007/bf02345020 1975

[5] [5]

Black holes and entropy,

J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,” Phys. Rev. D7(1973), 2333-2346

1973

[6] [6]

The Four laws of black hole mechanics,

J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter and S. W. Hawking, “The Four laws of black hole mechanics,” Commun. Math. Phys.31(1973), 161-170

1973

[7] [7]

Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with Lambda,

D. Kubiznak, R. B. Mann and M. Teo, “Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with Lambda,” Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) no.6, 063001 [arXiv:1608.06147 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2017

[8] [8]

S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, Commun. Math. Phys.87(1983), 577 doi:10.1007/BF01208266

doi:10.1007/bf01208266 1983