REVIEW 1 cited by
Are Current Task-oriented Dialogue Systems Able to Satisfy Impolite Users?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Task-oriented dialogue (TOD) systems have assisted users on many tasks, including ticket booking and service inquiries. While existing TOD systems have shown promising performance in serving customer needs, these systems mostly assume that users would interact with the dialogue agent politely. This assumption is unrealistic as impatient or frustrated customers may also interact with TOD systems impolitely. This paper aims to address this research gap by investigating impolite users' effects on TOD systems. Specifically, we constructed an impolite dialogue corpus and conducted extensive experiments to evaluate the state-of-the-art TOD systems on our impolite dialogue corpus. Our experimental results show that existing TOD systems are unable to handle impolite user utterances. We also present a data augmentation method to improve TOD performance in impolite dialogues. Nevertheless, handling impolite dialogues remains a very challenging research task. We hope by releasing the impolite dialogue corpus and establishing the benchmark evaluations, more researchers are encouraged to investigate this new challenging research task.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Learning Text Styles: A Study on Transfer, Attribution, and Verification
A thesis compiles published work claiming that lightweight adapters, contrastive disentanglement, and instruction tuning improve text style transfer, authorship attribution, and authorship verification.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.