Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 33 references

Particle dynamics in TOI-178 planetary system

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read TOI-178's resonant chain widens planet-clearing zones by 30%

desk verdict Useful first map of TOI-178's particle dynamics, but the co-orbital width percentages are mis-normalized and the theory baseline doesn't match the table, so the headline numbers need redoing. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.07930 v1 pith:O7HIT6GJ submitted 2025-09-09 astro-ph.EP

J. Boskovic , R. Sfair , C. M. Schäfer This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords TOI-178Laplaceresonancechaintestparticlesco-orbitalregionsKirkwoodgapsmean-motionresonancesinclinationoscillationsN-bodysimulations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper addresses a concrete question: if massless test particles are spread through the six-planet TOI-178 system—five planets locked in a 2:4:6:9:12 Laplace resonance chain—where does the planetary architecture leave them? The authors find that every planet clears a co-orbital zone wider than the classical two-body horseshoe estimate: about 30% wider for the five chain planets and 52% wider for the inner non-chain planet TOI-178b. They also identify Kirkwood-gap-like depletion bands between TOI-178e and f at specific mean-motion resonances, clearing on roughly 500-year timescales, and a coherent 196-year inclination oscillation in the innermost disk that matches TOI-178b's own oscillation. If these simulations describe the real system, any residual dust or planetesimals in TOI-178 should show these dynamical fingerprints, and similar signatures could be sought in other resonant multi-planet systems. The paper offers this as a baseline characterization for future comparative studies.

What carries the argument

The analysis is carried by massless test particles—one million in the main run—integrated under the gravity of the six planets with an adaptive high-order integrator and collision/escape removal. The load-bearing comparisons are: (i) measured co-orbital zone widths, defined by a fixed particle-density threshold, versus the classical horseshoe-width formula W≈0.5 μ a; (ii) observed depletion bands versus resonance libration widths computed from the disturbing function; and (iii) Fourier analysis of inner-disk inclinations identifying the 196-year period and its match to TOI-178b's oscillation.

What would settle it

Re-run the identical particle grid with planetary initial angles drawn from the discovery paper's fitted resonant solution instead of all zero, and check whether the 2:4:6:9:12 resonance arguments stay bounded; if the co-orbital widths then match the classical horseshoe formula, the reported 30% and 52% enhancements are artifacts of the initial setup. A lighter check: compute the resonant arguments from the current simulation and see whether they librate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim: TOI-178's resonant architecture reshapes the small-body environment. After integrating one million massless test particles for 500 years, the paper finds each chain planet's depleted co-orbital zone is about 30% wider than the classical horseshoe prediction W≈0.5 μ a, while the inner non-chain planet TOI-178b shows a 52% enhancement. Between e and f, mean-motion resonances create Kirkwood-gap-like bands at 4:3, 5:4, 6:5 with f and 5:3 with g, clearing within about 500 years. The innermost disk shows a persistent 196-year inclination oscillation matching TOI-178b's, peaking near the 3:2 resonance. These structures are a baseline for small-body dynamics in resonant multi-pla

Load-bearing premise

The findings assume the simulated planets, started with all perihelion and node angles zero and mean longitudes derived from transit times, remain in the same 2:4:6:9:12 resonant chain as the observed TOI-178; the paper never verifies that the resonance angles actually librate during the integration.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Around each chain planet, a particle-free zone about 30% wider than the classical horseshoe estimate should persist; around TOI-178b the cleared zone should be about 52% wider.
  • Between TOI-178e and f, particles should be cleared from the 4:3, 5:4 and 6:5 resonances with f and the 5:3 resonance with g within roughly 500 years, leaving gaps offset by 0.001–0.002 au from nominal resonance locations.
  • In the innermost disk (0.015–0.025 au), particle inclinations should oscillate with period about 196 years, matching TOI-178b's own oscillation, and the pattern should persist for at least 10,000 years.
  • These structures provide a baseline signature that can be compared with particle dynamics in other multi-planet systems with resonant chains.
  • The systematic offset between simulated and classical co-orbital widths implies that single-planet clearing estimates may underpredict how strongly compact resonant systems sweep their neighborhoods.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 30% versus 52% difference is caused by chain membership, then a planet just outside a resonant chain in a compact multi-planet system may clear a disproportionately wide zone; this could be tested by rerunning the simulations with the chain artificially broken.
  • The spatial peak of inclination amplitude near the 3:2 resonance with TOI-178b hints that mean-motion resonance proximity can amplify secular inclination forcing; a targeted simulation varying particle semimajor axis around that resonance could confirm the amplification mechanism.
  • The reported offsets between gap centers and nominal resonance locations suggest that observed gap positions, not nominal resonance locations, may be the better tracer of planet masses; fitting synthetic gap positions to observed debris gaps could test this.
  • Because the 500-year main integration is shorter than the estimated clearing timescales of thousands of years for the most massive planets, the measured co-orbital widths may still be growing; longer integrations could show even larger enhancements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper uses rebound/IAS15 to evolve 10^6 massless test particles together with the six TOI-178 planets for 500 yr, plus two targeted runs, in order to map cleared zones, mean-motion resonances, and inclination dynamics. It reports that co-orbital widths around the five chain planets are ~30% larger than the Dermott–Murray horseshoe prediction and that TOI-178b shows a 52% enhancement; it identifies Kirkwood-gap-like structures between TOI-178e and TOI-178f at the 4:3, 5:4, 6:5 (TOI-178f) and 5:3 (TOI-178g) resonances; and it reports a 196-year inclination oscillation in the innermost region with maximum amplitude near TOI-178b's 3:2 resonance.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper would provide a useful baseline characterization of small-body dynamics in a compact Laplace chain and a set of falsifiable predictions for resonance-gap locations and clearing timescales. Strengths include the use of a well-tested high-accuracy integrator, large particle numbers, and explicit quantitative predictions. However, the headline enhancement percentages are mis-normalized, the theoretical baseline formula is not the one actually used in Table 2, and the planetary initial conditions are not validated against the observed resonant state. These issues affect the central quantitative claims, so the paper needs substantial revision before the results can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; Table 2; §3.2] The abstract's '30% wider' and '52% enhancement' are not what Table 2 computes. The header 'Relative difference (% of W_hs,sim)' means (W_sim − W_theo)/W_sim, whereas 'wider than predicted' requires (W_sim − W_theo)/W_theo. With the table's numbers, TOI-178b's enhancement is (1.04−0.497)/0.497 ≈ 109%, not 52%, and the chain planets are ~40–55%, not ~30%. The quoted percentages are the complement and systematically understate the claimed effect.
  2. [Eq. (4); Table 2] The theoretical baseline is inconsistently specified. Eq. (4) gives W_hs ∼ 0.5 µ a, which for TOI-178b is ≈9×10^-5 au, whereas Table 2 lists W_hs,theo = 4.97×10^-4 au. The tabulated values match a·µ^(1/3) (about 1.44 Hill radii), not Eq. (4). Please state the exact formula and reference used for W_hs,theo and recompute Table 2 and all derived percentages.
  3. [§2; initial conditions] Planetary initial conditions are not validated. All ω, Ω, and M are set to zero, with only mean longitudes derived from transit times via Eq. (1). The paper never checks that the simulated planets actually maintain the 2:4:6:9:12 Laplace resonance with librating angles over the integration. Since Leleu et al. [5,18] show that ~0.01-day period changes destroy the resonant chain, the adopted angles may place the planets outside the true resonant state. Please demonstrate that the simulation reproduces the observed resonant configuration (librating Laplace angles, period ratios) before interpreting the particle dynamics as characterizing TOI-178.
  4. [§3.2; Table 2; §2] Co-orbital widths are reported as single values with no uncertainties. The boundaries depend on the arbitrary 20-particle threshold, the chosen collision radius (10% of the Hill radius), and the integration length. The 500-yr main run is shorter than the clearing timescales quoted via Eq. (3) (≈5,800–30,000 yr), so the measured widths may not be converged. No sensitivity tests to threshold, particle number, or integration time are shown, so the systematic differences in Table 2 cannot currently be distinguished from measurement artifacts.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (1)] The notation 'date ci' is undefined and the sign convention/epoch of the mean-longitude calculation should be clarified.
  2. [§3.2] The statement that Dermott and Murray [28] give Eq. (4) should be checked against the original paper; as written, Eq. (4) is not the formula used to generate Table 2.
  3. [References] Several references are incomplete or inconsistently formatted: [18] ends with 'al.', [32] lacks volume/page information, and [5] is cited as both 'Leleu et al.' and 'Leleu, A. et al.'.
  4. [Acknowledgements] Thanking anonymous reviewers in the preprint is nonstandard for a submitted manuscript and should be removed unless the paper is a revised version.
  5. [§2] The statement that 'full secular evolution' requires ~10^8 orbital periods is vague; please specify the relevant secular timescale more concretely.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central results come from direct N-body integrations compared against independent analytical baselines; reported normalization issues are correctness errors, not circular reasoning.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are derived from direct numerical integrations (REBOUND/IAS15) of a planetary system fixed by Leleu et al. (2021). Co-orbital widths are measured using a fixed 20-particle threshold and compared with the independent Dermott & Murray (1981) horseshoe-width formula; the theoretical widths in Table 2 are not fitted to the simulation. The resonance gaps are compared with the libration-width formula Eq. (5), and the paper explicitly notes that observed gaps are offset from nominal resonance locations, so the match is not imposed by construction. The 196-year inclination oscillation is identified by Fourier analysis of the simulation output, with no fitted parameter adjusted to produce that period. There are no load-bearing self-citations: references [5], [17], and [18] are external observational characterizations, while [28] and [30] are classical theory. The paper does contain a real quantitative inconsistency in the abstract: the Table 2 column 'Relative difference (% of W_hs,sim)' gives (W_sim−W_theo)/W_sim, so '30% wider than predicted' should be ~43% for chain planets and ~109% for TOI-178b relative to W_theo. Likewise, Eq. (4) does not reproduce the W_hs,theo values in Table 2, which match a Hill-radius scaling instead. These are reporting/definitional errors that undermine the headline numbers, but they do not make any prediction equivalent to its inputs by construction. The arbitrary width threshold and the unverified resonant libration of the simulated planets are correctness risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on a simulation setup whose planetary initial conditions are not demonstrated to match the observed resonant state, and on a comparison against a single-planet analytical formula. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Co-orbital width threshold = 20 particles per bin
    Chosen by hand to define cleared zone boundaries in histograms with 10^6 particles and 1000 bins; all quoted co-orbital widths and enhancement percentages depend on this threshold.
  • Collision radius fraction = 0.1 R_Hill per planet
    Planets assigned physical radius equal to 10% of Hill radius for collision detection; affects removal rates and clearing timescales.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math IAS15 with default tolerance accurately integrates the N-body system for 500 to 10,000 yr
    Trusted integrator; no independent verification in the paper (likely accepted in the field).
  • domain assumption Planetary masses, radii, and orbits from Leleu et al. (2021) are accurate
    The paper uses these parameters without re-fitting; any systematic errors propagate to particle dynamics.
  • ad hoc to paper Setting omega, Omega, M = 0 for all planets and using transit-derived mean longitudes reproduces the TOI-178 2:4:6:9:12 resonant configuration
    The paper never checks that the simulated Laplace angles librate. Given Leleu et al.'s sensitivity analysis, this is an unvalidated modeling choice.
  • domain assumption The Dermott-Murray horseshoe width formula W_hs approximately 0.5 mu a applies to each planet in a multi-planet resonant system
    The formula is derived for a single planet on a circular orbit in the restricted three-body problem; using it as the baseline for comparison in a compact resonant chain is a strong idealization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Particle dynamics in TOI-178 planetary system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O7HIT6GJ

@misc{pith2026250907930,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Particle dynamics in TOI-178 planetary system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O7HIT6GJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07930}
}
read the original abstract

The TOI-178 system hosts six planets with five of them locked in a :4:6:9:12 Laplace resonance chain. We perform N-body simulations to investigate the dynamics of test particles in this system. We observe that co-orbital regions around each planet are approximately 30\% wider than predicted by classical theory for planets in the resonance chain, while TOI-178b, which lies outside the chain, shows a 52\% enhancement. The region between TOI-178e and TOI-178f reveals Kirkwood gap-like structures created by mean-motion resonances with TOI-178f (4:3, 5:4, 6:5) and TOI-178g (5:3), where particle clearing occurs on 500-year timescales. An extended integration of the innermost region (0.015-0.025 au) shows periodic inclination oscillations with period 196 years, coincident with TOI-178b's own oscillation period, with maximum amplitude occurring near the 3:2 resonance location. These structures are consistent with the system's resonant architecture and provide a baseline characterization that enables future comparative studies of similar phenomena in other multi-planet systems with resonant configurations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nature533(7604), 509–512 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17445

    Mills, S.M., Fabrycky, D.C., Migaszewski, C., Ford, E.B., Petigura, E., Isaacson, H.: A resonant chain of four transiting, sub-Neptune planets. Nature533(7604), 509–512 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17445

    doi:10.1038/nature17445 2016

  2. [2]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society470(2), 1750–1770 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/stx1232

    Izidoro, A., Ogihara, M., Raymond, S.N., Morbidelli, A., Pierens, A., Bitsch, B., Cossou, C., Hersant, F.: Breaking the chains: hot super-Earth systems from migration and disruption of compact resonant chains. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society470(2), 1750–1770 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/stx1232

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Fabrycky, D.C., Lissauer, J.J., Ragozzine, D., Rowe, J.F., Steffen, J.H., Agol, E., Barclay, T., Batalha, N., Borucki, W., Ciardi, D.R., Ford, E.B., Gautier, T.N., Geary, J.C., Holman, M.J., Jenkins, J.M., Li, J., Morehead, R.C., Morris, R.L., Shporer, A., Smith, J.C., Still, M., Van Cleve, J.: Architecture of Kepler’s Multi- transiting Systems. II. New I...

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/790/2/146 2014

  4. [4]

    Nature470, 53–58 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09760

    Lissauer, J.J., Fabrycky, D.C., Ford, E.B., Borucki, W.J., Fressin, F., Marcy, G.W., Orosz, J.A., Rowe, J.F., Torres, G., Welsh, W.F., Batalha, N.M., Bryson, S.T., Buchhave, L.A., Caldwell, D.A., Carter, J.A., Charbonneau, D., Chris- tiansen, J.L., Cochran, W.D., Desert, J.-M., Dunham, E.W., Fanelli, M.N., Fortney, J.J., Gautier, T.N., Geary, J.C., Gillil...

    2011

  5. [5]

    C., Hooton, M

    Leleu, A., Alibert, Y., Hara, N. C., Hooton, M. J., Wilson, T. G., Robutel, P., Delisle, J.-B., Laskar, J., Hoyer, S., Lovis, C., Bryant, E. M., Ducrot, E., Cabrera, J., Delrez, L., Acton, J. S., Adibekyan, V., Allart, R., Allende Prieto, C., Alonso, R., Alves, D., Anderson, D. R., Angerhausen, D., Anglada Escud´ e, G., Asquier, J., Barrado, D., Barros, S...

    2021

  6. [6]

    ApJ807, 44 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/44

    Pu, B., Wu, Y.: Spacing of Kepler Planets: Sculpting by Dynamical Instability. ApJ807, 44 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/44

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/807/1/44 2015

  7. [7]

    ApJ654, 1110–1120 (2007) https://doi.org/10

    Terquem, C., Papaloizou, J.C.B.: Migration and the Formation of Systems of Hot Super-Earths and Neptunes. ApJ654, 1110–1120 (2007) https://doi.org/10. 1086/509497

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    AJ154, 236 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9216

    Wang, J., Fischer, D.A., Horch, E.P., Huang, X.: On the Occurrence Rate of Hot Jupiters in Different Stellar Environments. AJ154, 236 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9216

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa9216 2017

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    Nature542, 456–460 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21360

    Gillon, M., Triaud, A.H.M.J., Demory, B.-O., Jehin, E., Agol, E., Deck, K.M., Lederer, S.M., de Wit, J., Burdanov, A., Ingalls, J.G., Bolmont, E., Leconte, J., Raymond, S.N., Selsis, F., Turbet, M., Barkaoui, K., Burgasser, A., Burleigh, M.R., Carey, S.J., Chaushev, A., Copper...

    2017

  2. [10]

    Nature1, 0129 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/ 15 s41550-017-0129

    Luger, R., Sestovic, M., Kruse, E., Grimm, S.L., Demory, B.-O., Agol, E., Bol- mont, E., Fabrycky, D., Fernandes, C.S., Van Grootel, V., Burgasser, A., Gillon, M., Ingalls, J.G., Jehin, E., Raymond, S.N., Selsis, F., Triaud, A.H.M.J., Bar- clay, T., Barentsen, G., Howell, S.B....

    2017

  3. [11]

    MNRAS535, 3198–3210 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2518

    Gaslac Gallardo, D.M., Giuliatti Winter, S.M., Winter, O., Callegari, N., Mu˜ noz- Guti´ errez, M.A.: Analysing the dynamics of the Kepler-90 planetary system. MNRAS535, 3198–3210 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2518

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    A&A631, 90 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936267

    Lopez, T.A., Barros, S.C.C., Santerne, A., Deleuil, M., Adibekyan, V., Alme- nara, J.M., Armstrong, D.J., Barrado, D., Bayliss, D., Berardo, D., Boisse, I., Bonomo, A.S., Bouchy, F., Brown, D.J.A., Lillo-Box, J., Collier Cameron, A., Delrez, L., D ´ ıaz, R.F., Doyle, A., Dumus...

    2019

  5. [13]

    Nature 623, 932–937 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06692-3

    Luque, R., Osborn, H.P., Leleu, A., Pall´ e, E., Bonfanti, A., Barrag´ an, O., Wil- son, T.G., Broeg, C., Cameron, A.C., Lendl, M., Maxted, P.F.L., Olofsson, G., Sousa, S.G., Serrano, L.M., Adibekyan, V., Alibert, Y., Brandeker, A., Cabrera, J., Sulis, S., Van Grootel, V., Web...

    2023

  6. [14]

    MNRAS478, 2896–2909 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1273 16

    Mustill, A.J., Villaver, E., Veras, D., G¨ ansicke, B.T., Bonsor, A.: Foretellings of Ragnar¨ ok: World-engulfing Asymptotic Giants and the Inheritance of White Dwarfs. MNRAS478, 2896–2909 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1273 16

    2018 doi

  7. [15]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Science117, 18194–18205 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2001258117

    Tamayo, D., Cranmer, M., Hadden, S., Rein, H., Battaglia, P., Obertas, A., Armitage, P.J., Ho, S., Spergel, D.N., Gilbertson, C., Hussain, N., Silburt, A., Jontof-Hutter, D., Menou, K.: Predicting the long-term stability of com- pact multiplanet systems. Proceedings of the Nat...

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    MNRAS462, 2735–2747 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stw1822

    Shannon, A., Dawson, R.I.: The resonance overlap and Hill stability crite- ria revisited. MNRAS462, 2735–2747 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stw1822

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    A&A678, 200 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202245479

    Delrez, L., Leleu, A., Brandeker, A., Gillon, M., Hooton, M.J., Cameron, A.C., Deline, A., Fortier, A., Queloz, D., Bonfanti, A., Van Grootel, V., Wilson, T.G., Egger, J.A., Alibert, Y., Alonso, R., Anglada, G., Asquier, J., B´ arczy, T., Bar- rado y Navascues, D., Barros, S.C...

    2023

  10. [18]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics685, 221 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347790

    Leleu, A., Delisle, J.-B., Delrez, L., Bryant, E.M., Brandeker, A., Osborn, H.P., Hara, N., Wilson, T.G., Billot, N., Lendl, M., al.: Photo-dynamical character- isation of the TOI-178 resonant chain: Exploring the robustness of TTV and R V mass characterisation. Astronomy & As...

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    ApJ902(1), 20 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abba36 arXiv:2009.14723 [astro-ph.EP]

    Quarles, B., Li, G., Rosario-Franco, M.: Application of Orbital Stability and Tidal Migration Constraints for Exomoon Candidates. ApJ902(1), 20 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abba36 arXiv:2009.14723 [astro-ph.EP]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Nature2, 297–302 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0411-6

    Unterborn, C.T., Desch, S.J., Hinkel, N.R., Lorenzo, A.: Inward migration of the TRAPPIST-1 planets as inferred from their water-rich compositions. Nature2, 297–302 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0411-6

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    A&A613, 68 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732233

    Grimm, S.L., Demory, B.-O., Gillon, M., Dorn, C., Agol, E., Burdanov, A., Delrez, L., Sestovic, M., Triaud, A.H.M.J., Turbet, M., Bolmont, E., Caldas, A., de Wit, J., Jehin, E., Leconte, J., Raymond, S.N., Van Grootel, V., Burgasser, A.J., Carey, S., Fabrycky, D., Heng, K., He...

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    AJ87, 577–593 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1086/ 113132

    Wisdom, J.: The origin of the Kirkwood gaps: A mapping for asteroidal motion near the 3/1 commensurability. AJ87, 577–593 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1086/ 113132

    1982

  15. [23]

    Morbidelli, A.: Modern Celestial Mechanics : Aspects of Solar System Dynamics, (2002)

    2002

  16. [24]

    ARA&A53, 45–88 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122302

    Nesvorn´ y, D.: Dynamical Evolution of the Early Solar System. ARA&A53, 45–88 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122302

    2015 doi

  17. [25]

    A&A537, 128 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 201118085 arXiv:1110.4876 [astro-ph.EP]

    Rein, H., Liu, S.-F.: REBOUND: an open-source multi-purpose N-body code for collisional dynamics. A&A537, 128 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 201118085 arXiv:1110.4876 [astro-ph.EP]

    2012 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society446(2), 1424–1437 (2015) https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2164 arXiv:1409.4779 [astro-ph.EP]

    Rein, H., Spiegel, D.S.: IAS15: A fast, adaptive, high-order integrator for grav- itational dynamics, accurate to machine precision over a billion orbits. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society446(2), 1424–1437 (2015) https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2164 arXiv:140...

    2015 arXiv

  19. [27]

    In: 47th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference

    Margot, J.L.: A Quantitative Criterion for Defining Planets. In: 47th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Lunar and Planetary Science Confer- ence, p. 2699 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Dermott, S.F., Murray, C.D.: The dynamics of tadpole and horseshoe orbits I. Theory. Icarus48(1), 1–11 (1981) https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(81) 90147-0

    1981 doi

  21. [29]

    Kirkwood, D.: Meteoric Astronomy: a Treatise on Shooting-stars, Fireballs, and Aerolites., (1867)

  22. [30]

    https://doi.org/ 10.1017/CBO9781139174817

    Murray, C.D., Dermott, S.F.: Solar System Dynamics, (1999). https://doi.org/ 10.1017/CBO9781139174817

    1999 doi

  23. [31]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics56, 137–174 (2018)

    Nesvorn´ y, D., Morbidelli, A.: Dynamics of small bodies in planetary systems. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics56, 137–174 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters833(1), 4 (2017)

    Garraffo, C., Drake, J.J., Cohen, O.: The space weather of proxima centauri b. The Astrophysical Journal Letters833(1), 4 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics658, 170 (2022) 18

    Teyssandier, J., Libert, A.-S.: Trappist-1: Dynamical analysis of the transit-timing variations and origin of the resonant chain. Astronomy & Astrophysics658, 170 (2022) 18

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.