Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 104 references

Structural characterization of the candidate Weyl semimetal CeGaGe

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Single-crystal neutron diffraction shows that CeGaGe is noncentrosymmetric, with space group I4_1md (109) rather than the centrosymmetric I4_1/amd (141) that powder X-ray data suggested.

desk verdict The CeGaGe I4_1md assignment is likely right but the headline weak-reflection statistic is biased and the GoF values are unexplained; still deserves a genuine referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05219 v3 pith:O7QKZIHT submitted 2024-12-06 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Liam J. Scanlon , Santosh Bhusal , Christina M. Hoffmann , Junhong He , Sean R. Parkin , Brennan J. Arnold , William J. Gannon This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 61.05.fm
keywords CeGaGeWeylsemimetalnoncentrosymmetriccrystalstructurespacegroupI4_1mdsingle-crystalneutrondiffractioninversionsymmetryGa/Gesiteorderingstructuralphasetransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Single-crystal neutron diffraction shows that the candidate Weyl semimetal CeGaGe is noncentrosymmetric, with space group $I4_1md$ (109) rather than the centrosymmetric $I4_1/amd$ (141) that powder X-ray data had suggested. The distinction matters because broken inversion symmetry is one of the two routes to Weyl points in a band structure, so the answer decides whether CeGaGe is structurally eligible for inversion-breaking Weyl physics. The neutron experiment exploits the roughly 12% difference in the neutron scattering lengths of Ga and Ge, which X-rays cannot tell apart. The decisive evidence is a set of weak high-angle reflections whose Bragg planes contain only Ga or only Ge in $I4_1md$ but a mix of both in $I4_1/amd$. Some flux-grown crystals additionally show a subtle transition to primitive chiral $P4_3$/$P4_1$ symmetry on cooling.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing contrast is the difference between the bound coherent neutron scattering lengths of Ga and Ge, which differ by about 12%, while their X-ray scattering factors are nearly identical across scattering angles. In the noncentrosymmetric $I4_1md$ structure, Ga and Ge occupy distinct $4a$ sites; in the centrosymmetric $I4_1/amd$ structure, they would randomly share an $8e$ site. The experiment's discriminating power comes from weak, high-angle reflections whose Bragg planes can contain Ga without Ge or vice versa in $I4_1md$ but would contain both elements in $I4_1/amd$. The comparison of refined structure factors for the two models, including the $R$-factor gap and the 911-of-1236 count, is what carries the assignment.

What would settle it

On the same float-zone crystal, re-collect the weak high-angle reflections with longer counting time or a different neutron wavelength and refine both space-group models with unbiased sigma estimates; if the 911-of-1236 preference for $I4_1md$ is not reproduced, or if the two models become statistically indistinguishable, the central claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

CeGaGe forms with noncentrosymmetric $I4_1md$ symmetry at room temperature and, in float-zone crystals, remains so at 100 K. This is established by single-crystal time-of-flight neutron diffraction with 4430 indexed reflections: refinements give $R = 0.161$ for $I4_1md$ versus $0.224$ for $I4_1/amd$, and among 1236 weak reflections with $|F_c|^2$ between $10^{-4}$ and $1.25$, 911 put the observed intensities in better agreement with $I4_1md$. The physically intuitive content is that high-angle reflections such as $(-2,-2,-16)$ correspond to Bragg planes that can be occupied by Ga alone or Ge alone in the noncentrosymmetric structure, whereas the centrosymmetric alternative would force both elements onto the same site and nearly extinguish those reflections. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction corroborates the noncentrosymmetric assignment through a Flack parameter of $0.49(8)$, indicating near-perfect inversion twinning. The paper also reports that some flux-grown crystals show a subtle structural transition from body-centered $I4_1md$ to primitive chiral $P4_3$ (or $P4_1$) symmetry between room temperature and 100 K.

Load-bearing premise

The $I4_1md$ conclusion depends on the weak high-angle reflection intensities surviving time-of-flight data reduction (background subtraction, absorption, outlier rejection, and extinction correction) without systematic bias, and on the reported difference in goodness of fit (19.13 versus 22.40) being statistically meaningful even though both values are far from the ideal of 1.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • CeGaGe satisfies the structural prerequisite for inversion-breaking Weyl physics in float-zone crystals at least down to 100 K, so future band-structure calculations and transport experiments can be interpreted against a noncentrosymmetric model.
  • Powder X-ray diffraction cannot reliably assign the space group in this material family when the two p-element atoms are nearly isoelectronic; a complementary single-crystal neutron experiment is needed for a definitive answer.
  • Studies of CeGaGe must account for sample history: some flux-grown crystals transform to primitive chiral $P4_3$/$P4_1$ symmetry on cooling, which changes the symmetry conditions for Weyl nodes and magnetic order.
  • Earlier physical-property reports on CeGaGe were based on samples whose symmetry was not definitively known, and the new structural determination puts those measurements on firmer footing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported sample-to-sample variation suggests that transport and magnetic measurements of CeGaGe may have been performed on crystals with different low-temperature crystallographic symmetries; re-characterizing the very crystals used in those experiments would show whether this is so.
  • The same high-angle, weak-reflection logic could be used to screen other RXZ candidates (rare earth, Al/Ga, Si/Ge) where X-ray contrast between the two p-element atoms is poor, especially for detecting hidden symmetry-lowering transitions.
  • If the $I4_1md$-to-$P4_3$/$P4_1$ transition is continuous or occurs near the magnetic ordering temperature, its thermodynamic signature would be difficult to see in specific heat; measuring the temperature dependence of elastic constants is a concrete testable extension that would locate the transition and reveal any coupling to magnetism.
  • Because the 911-of-1236 statistic is paired with a goodness-of-fit far from the ideal value of 1, a more rigorous statistical comparison of the two refinements would make the space-group assignment quantitative rather than indicative.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a structural determination of the candidate Weyl semimetal CeGaGe using single-crystal neutron diffraction (SCND) at 100 K, complemented by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD), powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The authors claim that the SCND data confirm the noncentrosymmetric space group I4_1md (No. 109) over the centrosymmetric I4_1/amd (No. 141), citing global R-factors of 0.161 vs 0.224 and a weak-reflection agreement count of 911/1236. They also report that some flux-grown crystals show additional weak reflections at 100 K consistent with a transition to primitive chiral space groups P4_3/P4_1, while a float-zone crystal retains I4_1md down to 100 K.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper would resolve a long-standing structural ambiguity in an equiatomic rare-earth intermetallic and would establish CeGaGe as a structurally valid noncentrosymmetric platform for studying Weyl physics in the presence of magnetic moments. The paper's demonstration that PXRD is insensitive to the space-group choice, and the careful SCND measurement with extensive high-angle coverage, are valuable contributions. The compositional consistency between EDX and the I4_1md refinement is a useful cross-check. However, the statistical evidence for the space-group assignment is presently incomplete: the key model comparison relies on unweighted counts and goodness-of-fit values far from unity, and the SCXRD Flack parameter does not provide the independent corroboration claimed. The conclusion may well be correct, but the paper's stated 'definitively resolves' is stronger than the evidence currently supports.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, weak-reflection analysis (Fig. 5, 1236-reflection subset)] The 911/1236 statistic is an unweighted count of which model gives a smaller absolute residual, applied to reflections pre-selected with |Fo|^2/σ^2 ≥ 3. Because every retained weak reflection has a positive, statistically significant observed intensity, this selection biases |Fo|^2 upward relative to the true intensity. The I4_1md model predicts larger |Fc|^2 for 986 of the 1236 reflections, so the larger-prediction model can win more of the absolute-difference comparisons even when I4_1/amd is the true structure. The authors should present a bias-corrected comparison (e.g., include below-threshold reflections, use σ-weighted residuals, or simulate the selection under both models) or apply a formal hypothesis test such as the Hamilton R-factor test.
  2. [Section III, reliability factors and goodness-of-fit] The paper reports GoF = 19.13 for I4_1md and 22.40 for I4_1/amd, values far from the ideal of 1, indicating that the σ estimates or the models are substantially imperfect. The R-factor difference (0.161 vs 0.224) is presented as decisive, but with GoF this large the difference may be dominated by systematic errors in TOF reduction, absorption, extinction, or background treatment rather than by space-group symmetry. The manuscript does not report the weighted R-factor, the number of parameters and degrees of freedom, or a formal likelihood/Hamilton test that uses the reported σ's. Without such a test, the statistical significance of the R-factor difference is not established.
  3. [Section IV, SCXRD and Flack parameter] The claim that a Flack parameter of 0.49(8) 'indicates that the parameter is well defined and so the structure is noncentrosymmetric' is not logically valid. A centrosymmetric structure refined in a noncentrosymmetric space group with an inversion twin can also yield a well-defined Flack parameter near 0.5. Because Ga and Ge have nearly equal X-ray form factors at Mo Kα and the anomalous dispersion of Ce is weak at this wavelength, the SCXRD refinement cannot independently distinguish the two structural models; the slightly better R-factors (0.0249 vs 0.0263) are likely not significant. The SCXRD data therefore do not provide the corroboration claimed in the abstract and conclusions.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The word 'complimentary' should be 'complementary' in the abstract, the introduction, and Section IV (Section IV, first paragraph).
  2. [Section III, around Eq. (1)] The R-factor in Eq. (1) is defined with |Fo| and |Fc| (not their squares), but the text and figures discuss |Fo|^2 vs |Fc|^2. Please clarify the convention used in the reported R-factors and the axis labels of Figs. 4 and 7.
  3. [Section III, data reduction paragraph] The sentence 'Each of the structure factors had |Fo|^2/σ_o^2 ≥ 3, which is larger than the forced signal to noise cutoff of |Fo|^2/σ_o^2 ≥ 1' is confusing; specify which cutoff is applied by the TOPAZ/MANTID pipeline and which is imposed by the authors.
  4. [Table I and Section II] The composition entries for the I4_1/amd refinement (Ga 0.96(2) and Ge 1.00(8)) are not explained; if these are site occupancies on a shared 8e site, they should sum to 1. Please clarify the normalization convention.
  5. [Section V, structural transition] The transition to P4_3/P4_1 is inferred from weak extra reflections in SCXRD, and the authors speculate about impurity or stoichiometry effects. A brief discussion of possible multiple domains or multiple crystals would help readers assess the single-crystal evidence.
  6. [References] Reference [73] points to Supplemental Material via a DOI link that may not be stable; consider providing an archive identifier or a note on how to access the data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the I4_1md assignment is an empirical refinement comparison, not a fitted input or self-citation chain.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained with respect to the paper's central claim. The I4_1md assignment is based on two independently refined structural models (space groups 109 and 141) against the same measured SCND structure factors, using conventional R-factors [Eq. (1)], goodness-of-fit values, and a weak-reflection subset; these are external data-model comparisons, not quantities defined by the conclusion. The 1236-reflection subset is selected using the I4_1/amd model's |Fc|^2, and the '911 of 1236' agreement count is an empirical statistic of measured |Fo|^2 relative to both models; although selection with |Fo|^2/σ^2 ≥ 3 and the large GoF values may raise statistical-significance concerns, this is a validity issue rather than definitional circularity. The only self-citation of note—NdAlSi SCND [11], which shares coauthor C. M. Hoffmann—is used as methodological motivation and independent precedent; the CeGaGe result is justified by the TOPAZ data and GSAS-II refinements presented in the paper, not by that citation. SCXRD provides separate corroboration. No equation or fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing premise reduces to a self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central structural assignment rests on standard crystallographic refinement assumptions (kinematic scattering, absorption/extinction corrections, reliable sigma values) and on the fitted occupancies of Ce, Ga, and Ge, which differ from full stoichiometry and are refined rather than fixed. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Ce occupancy (I4_1md refinement) = 0.91(2)
    Refined in GSAS-II against SCND data; affects calculated structure factors and the model comparison; consistent with EDX composition 0.95(2).
  • Ga occupancy (I4_1md refinement) = 1.00(2)
    Refined to near full occupancy; supports distinct Ga site in the I4_1md model.
  • Ge occupancy (I4_1md refinement) = 0.83(2)
    Refined to about 17% deficiency; consistent with EDX 0.86(1) and affects the I4_1md model's ability to fit weak reflections.
  • Secondary type-1 extinction parameter E_g = 5.22e-4
    Fitted in GSAS-II; extinction corrections affect the weak high-angle reflection intensities used to discriminate the two space groups.
  • Weak-reflection intensity threshold range = 10^-4 to 1.25 in |F_c|^2
    Hand-chosen to isolate weak reflections for the 911-of-1236 statistic; the global R-factor comparison does not rely on this subset, but the illustrative statistic does.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Kinematic scattering theory and standard least-squares refinement against |F|^2 are valid for all structure factor calculations.
    Invoked throughout Sections III and IV for GSAS-II and SHELXL refinements.
  • domain assumption Neutron scattering lengths for Ga and Ge from Sears/NIST differ by 12% and are accurate.
    This contrast is the basis for the SCND discrimination; cited from Refs. 71 and 72.
  • domain assumption The measured crystal is a single crystal with negligible multiple scattering and correct orientation.
    Assumed in Section III for the TOPAZ experiment; merging of 19 phi angles is presented as evidence.
  • domain assumption Absorption, Lorentz, flux, and background corrections in MANTID and GSAS-II are adequate for weak reflections.
    Required for the weak high-angle reflections that drive the space-group conclusion; not independently validated.
  • standard math Space group extinction rules from International Tables are correctly applied to index reflections and identify extra peaks.
    Used in Section III for I4_1md/I4_1/amd and in Section V to assign primitive P4_3/P4_1 reflections.
  • ad hoc to paper The flux-grown crystal's extra reflections at 100 K are intrinsic to the sample rather than from impurity phases or twinning.
    Supports the P4_3/P4_1 transition claim in Section V; the authors themselves speculate that impurities or defects could be responsible.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Structural characterization of the candidate Weyl semimetal CeGaGe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O7QKZIHT

@misc{pith2026241205219,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Structural characterization of the candidate Weyl semimetal CeGaGe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O7QKZIHT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05219}
}
abstract

Weyl semimetals have a variety of intriguing physical properties, including topologically protected electronic states that coexist with conducting states. Possible exploitation of topologically protected states in a conducting material is promising for technological applications. Weyl semimetals that form in a noncentrosymmetric structure that also contain magnetic moments may host a variety of emergent phenomena that cannot be seen in magnetic, centrosymmetric Weyl materials. It can be difficult to distinguish definitively between a centrosymmetric structure and one of its noncentrosymmetric subgroups with standard powder X-ray diffractometers in cases where two atoms in the compound have nearly the same atomic number, as is the case for the candidate Weyl semimetal CeGaGe. In these cases, a careful single-crystal neutron diffraction experiment with high-angle reflections provides complimentary information to X-ray diffraction and definitively resolves any ambiguity between centrosymmetric and noncentrosymmetric crystal structures. Single-crystal neutron diffraction measurements on the candidate Weyl semimetal CeGaGe confirm that its structure is noncentrosymmetric, described by space group 109 $\left(I4_1md\right)$ rather than the centrosymmetric space group 141 $\left(I4_1/amd\right)$. There are many high-angle reflections in the data set that give clear, physically intuitive evidence that CeGaGe forms with $I4_1md$ symmetry since Bragg planes of these reflections can contain Ga with no Ge or vice versa, whereas the Bragg planes for a structure with $I4_1/amd$ symmetry would have a mix of Ga and Ge. Further, in some crystals we have studied, there is clear evidence for a structural transition from body-centered $I4_1md$ symmetry to primitive $P4_3$ and/or $P4_1$ symmetry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.05219 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Structure of CeGaGe: The unit cell of CeGaGe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD): Scattered X-ray intensity as a function of scattering angle 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Single-crystal neutron diffraction (SCND) refine [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Reflections with small [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) The crystal structure with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Square moduli of observed structure factors measured [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Evidence of structural transition in flux-grown [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane. Colloquium: Topological insulators.Rev. Mod. Phys., 82:3045–3067, Nov 2010. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045. URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.3045 2010

  2. [2]

    A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim. The electronic properties of graphene.Rev. Mod. Phys., 81:109–162, Jan 2009. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.109. URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.109

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.109 2009

  3. [3]

    Andrei and Allan H

    Eva Y. Andrei and Allan H. MacDonald. Graphene bilayers with a twist.Nature Materials, 19(12): 1265–1275, November 2020. ISSN 1476-4660. doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-00840-0. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/s41563-020-00840-0

    doi:10.1038/s41563-020-00840-0 2020

  4. [4]

    Topological ma- terials: Weyl semimetals.Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics, 8(1):337–354, March 2017

    Binghai Yan and Claudia Felser. Topological ma- terials: Weyl semimetals.Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics, 8(1):337–354, March 2017. ISSN 1947-5462. doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys- 031016-025458. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-conmatphys-031016-025458

    doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys- 2017

  5. [5]

    Zahid Hasan, Guoqing Chang, Ilya Belopolski, Guang Bian, Su-Yang Xu, and Jia-Xin Yin

    M. Zahid Hasan, Guoqing Chang, Ilya Belopolski, Guang Bian, Su-Yang Xu, and Jia-Xin Yin. Weyl, Dirac and high-fold chiral fermions in topological quantum mat- ter.Nature Reviews Materials, 6(9):784–803, April 2021. ISSN 2058-8437. doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00301-3. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00301-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00301-3 2021

  6. [6]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and Ashvin Vish- wanath. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids.Rev. Mod. Phys., 90:015001, Jan 2018. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015001. URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015001. 9

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015001 2018

  7. [7]

    Sanchez, Guoqing Chang, Benedikt Ernst, Jiaxin Yin, Songtian S

    Ilya Belopolski, Kaustuv Manna, Daniel S. Sanchez, Guoqing Chang, Benedikt Ernst, Jiaxin Yin, Songtian S. Zhang, Tyler Cochran, Nana Shumiya, Hao Zheng, Ba- hadur Singh, Guang Bian, Daniel Multer, Maksim Litske- vich, Xiaoting Zhou, Shin-Ming Huang, Baokai Wang, Tay-Rong Chang, Su-Yang Xu, Arun Bansil, Claudia Felser, Hsin Lin, and M. Zahid Hasan. Discove...

    2019

  8. [8]

    Su-Yang Xu, Nasser Alidoust, Guoqing Chang, Hong Lu, Bahadur Singh, Ilya Belopolski, Daniel S. Sanchez, Xiao Zhang, Guang Bian, Hao Zheng, Marious- Adrian Husanu, Yi Bian, Shin-Ming Huang, Chuang- Han Hsu, Tay-Rong Chang, Horng-Tay Jeng, Arun Bansil, Titus Neupert, Vladimir N. Strocov, Hsin Lin, Shuang Jia, and M. Zahid Hasan. Discov- ery of Lorentz-viola...

    doi:10.1126/sciadv.1603266 2017

Show all 104 references
  1. [9]

    Gao, and K

    Ying-Ming Xie, Xue-Jian Gao, Xiao Yan Xu, Cheng- Ping Zhang, Jin-Xin Hu, Jason Z. Gao, and K. T. Law. Kramers nodal line metals.Nature Commu- nications, 12(1), May 2021. ISSN 2041-1723. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22903-9. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/s41467-021-22903-9

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    Hirschmann, Andreas Leonhardt, Berkay Kilic, Douglas H

    Moritz M. Hirschmann, Andreas Leonhardt, Berkay Kilic, Douglas H. Fabini, and Andreas P. Schnyder. Symmetry-enforced band crossings in tetragonal ma- terials: Dirac and Weyl degeneracies on points, lines, and planes.Phys. Rev. Mater., 5:054202, May 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMat...

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    Weyl-mediated helical mag- netism in NdAlSi.Nat

    Jonathan Gaudet, Hung-Yu Yang, Santu Baidya, Baozhu Lu, Guangyong Xu, Yang Zhao, Jose A Rodriguez- Rivera, Christina M Hoffmann, David E Graf, Darius H Torchinsky, Predrag Nikoli´ c, David Vanderbilt, Fazel Tafti, and Collin L Broholm. Weyl-mediated helical mag- netism in NdAl...

  4. [12]

    NdAlSi: A magnetic Weyl semimetal candidate with rich magnetic phases and atypical transport proper- ties.Phys

    Jin-Feng Wang, Qing-Xin Dong, Zhao-Peng Guo, Meng Lv, Yi-Fei Huang, Jun-Sen Xiang, Zhi-An Ren, Zhi- Jun Wang, Pei-Jie Sun, Gang Li, and Gen-Fu Chen. NdAlSi: A magnetic Weyl semimetal candidate with rich magnetic phases and atypical transport proper- ties.Phys. Rev. B, 105:1444...

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    Quantum oscillations in the magnetic Weyl semimetal NdAlSi arising from strong Weyl fermion–4felectron ex- change interaction.Physical Review B, 108(2), July 2023

    Jin-Feng Wang, Qing-Xin Dong, Yi-Fei Huang, Zhao- Sheng Wang, Zhao-Peng Guo, Zhi-Jun Wang, Zhi-An Ren, Gang Li, Pei-Jie Sun, Xi Dai, and Gen-Fu Chen. Quantum oscillations in the magnetic Weyl semimetal NdAlSi arising from strong Weyl fermion–4felectron ex- change interaction.P...

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    Berntsen, Youguo Shi, Tao Xiang, and Oscar Tjernberg

    Cong Li, Jianfeng Zhang, Yang Wang, Hongx- iong Liu, Qinda Guo, Emile Rienks, Wanyu Chen, Francois Bertran, Huancheng Yang, Dibya Phuyal, Hanna Fedderwitz, Balasubramanian Thiagarajan, Ma- ciej Dendzik, Magnus H. Berntsen, Youguo Shi, Tao Xiang, and Oscar Tjernberg. Emergence ...

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    Gravitational anomaly in the ferrimagnetic topological Weyl semimetal NdAlSi.Phys

    Pardeep Kumar Tanwar, Mujeeb Ahmad, Md Shahin Alam, Xiaohan Yao, Fazel Tafti, and Marcin Matusiak. Gravitational anomaly in the ferrimagnetic topological Weyl semimetal NdAlSi.Phys. Rev. B, 108:L161106, Oct

  8. [16]

    Large power factor, anomalous Nernst effect, and temperature-dependent thermoelectric quantum oscillations in the magnetic Weyl semimetal NdAlSi.Phys

    Qing-Xin Dong, Jin-Feng Wang, Li-Bo Zhang, Jian-Li Bai, Qiao-Yu Liu, Jing-Wen Cheng, Pin-Yu Liu, Cun- Dong Li, Jun-Sen Xiang, Zhi-An Ren, Pei-Jie Sun, and Gen-Fu Chen. Large power factor, anomalous Nernst effect, and temperature-dependent thermoelectric quantum oscillations in...

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    Anisotropic metamagnetic transition and intrinsic Berry curvature in magnetic Weyl semimetal NdAlGe.SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022

    Keunki Cho, Won Hyuk Shon, Kyoo Kim, Jaehan Bae, Jaewoong Lee, Chang-Soo Park, Seungha Yoon, Beongki Cho, Pooja Rawat, and Jong-Soo Rhyee. Anisotropic metamagnetic transition and intrinsic Berry curvature in magnetic Weyl semimetal NdAlGe.SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022. ISSN 15...

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    Pressure-tuning domain-wall chirality in noncentrosym- metric magnetic Weyl semimetal CeAlGe.Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 66(3), feb 2023

    Xiaobo He, Yuke Li, Hai Zeng, Zengwei Zhu, Shiyong Tan, Yongjun Zhang, Chao Cao, and Yongkang Luo. Pressure-tuning domain-wall chirality in noncentrosym- metric magnetic Weyl semimetal CeAlGe.Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 66(3), feb 2023. ISSN 1869-1927. doi:10...

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    Hodovanets, C

    H. Hodovanets, C. J. Eckberg, P. Y. Zavalij, H. Kim, W.-C. Lin, M. Zic, D. J. Campbell, J. S. Higgins, and J. Paglione. Single-crystal investigation of the pro- posed type-II Weyl semimetal CeAlGe.Phys. Rev. B, 98:245132, Dec 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.245132. URLhttps://li...

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    Hodovanets, C

    H. Hodovanets, C. J. Eckberg, D. J. Campbell, Y. Eo, P. Y. Zavalij, P. Piccoli, T. Metz, H. Kim, J. S. Higgins, and J. Paglione. Anomalous symmetry breaking in the weyl semimetal CeAlGe.Phys. Rev. B, 106:235102, Dec

  13. [21]

    M. M. Piva, J. C. Souza, G. A. Lombardi, K. R. Pakuszewski, C. Adriano, P. G. Pagliuso, and M. Nick- las. Topological Hall effect in CeAlGe.Physical Re- view Materials, 7(7), jul 2023. ISSN 2475-9953. doi: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.7.074204. URLhttp://dx. doi.org/10.1103/PhysRe...

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    Gawryluk, Junzhang Ma, Muntaser Naamneh, Nicholas C

    Pascal Puphal, Vladimir Pomjakushin, Naoya Kanazawa, Victor Ukleev, Dariusz J. Gawryluk, Junzhang Ma, Muntaser Naamneh, Nicholas C. Plumb, Lukas Keller, Robert Cubitt, Ekaterina Pom- jakushina, and Jonathan S. White. Topological magnetic phase in the candidate Weyl semimetal C...

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    Suzuki, L

    T. Suzuki, L. Savary, J.-P. Liu, J. W. Lynn, L. Balents, and J. G. Checkelsky. Singular angular magnetore- sistance in a magnetic nodal semimetal.Science, 365 (6451):377–381, 2019. doi:10.1126/science.aat0348. URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science. aat0348

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    Drucker, Thanh Nguyen, Fei Han, Phum Siriviboon, Xi Luo, Nina Andrejevic, Ziming Zhu, Grig- ory Bednik, Quynh T

    Nathan C. Drucker, Thanh Nguyen, Fei Han, Phum Siriviboon, Xi Luo, Nina Andrejevic, Ziming Zhu, Grig- ory Bednik, Quynh T. Nguyen, Zhantao Chen, Linh K. Nguyen, Tongtong Liu, Travis J. Williams, Matthew B. Stone, Alexander I. Kolesnikov, Songxue Chi, Jaime Fernandez-Baca, Chri...

    2023

  17. [25]

    27Al NMR study of the magnetic Weyl semimetal CeAlGe.Phys

    Zhuo Wang, Xiaobo He, Fangjun Lu, Hai Zeng, Shuo Zou, Xiao-Xiao Zhang, and Yongkang Luo. 27Al NMR study of the magnetic Weyl semimetal CeAlGe.Phys. Rev. B, 109:245106, Jun 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.245106. URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.245106

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    Soh, Tian Shang, Marisa Medarde, Jonathan S

    Pascal Puphal, Charles Mielke, Neeraj Kumar, Y. Soh, Tian Shang, Marisa Medarde, Jonathan S. White, and Ekaterina Pomjakushina. Bulk single-crystal growth of the theoretically predicted magnetic weyl semimet- alsRAlGe (R=Pr, Ce).Physical Review Materi- als, 3(2), February 2019...

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    Md Shahin Alam, Amar Fakhredine, Mujeeb Ahmad, P. K. Tanwar, Hung-Yu Yang, Fazel Tafti, Giuseppe Cuono, Rajibul Islam, Bahadur Singh, Artem Lyn- nyk, Carmine Autieri, and Marcin Matusiak. Sign change of anomalous Hall effect and anomalous Nernst effect in the Weyl semimetal Ce...

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    Christian Tzschaschel, Jian-Xiang Qiu, Xue-Jian Gao, Hou-Chen Li, Chunyu Guo, Hung-Yu Yang, Cheng-Ping Zhang, Ying-Ming Xie, Yu-Fei Liu, Anyuan Gao, Damien B´ erub´ e, Thao Dinh, Sheng-Chin Ho, Yuqiang Fang, Fuqiang Huang, Johanna Nordlander, Qiong Ma, Fazel Tafti, Philip J. W...

    2024 doi

  21. [29]

    Peets, Weiwei Zhao, Yimin Wan, Ulrich Burkhardt, Yanfeng Guo, Shiyan Li, Claudia Felser, Wenge Yang, and Bernd B¨ uchner

    Erjian Cheng, Limin Yan, Xianbiao Shi, Rui Lou, Alexander Fedorov, Mahdi Behnami, Jian Yuan, Peng- tao Yang, Bosen Wang, Jin-Guang Cheng, Yuanji Xu, Yang Xu, Wei Xia, Nikolai Pavlovskii, Darren C. Peets, Weiwei Zhao, Yimin Wan, Ulrich Burkhardt, Yanfeng Guo, Shiyan Li, Claudia...

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    M. M. Piva, J. C. Souza, V. Brousseau-Couture, Sopheak Sorn, K. R. Pakuszewski, Janas K. John, C. Adri- ano, M. Cˆ ot´ e, P. G. Pagliuso, Arun Paramekanti, and M. Nicklas. Topological features in the ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal CeAlSi: Role of domain walls.Phys- ical Review R...

    2023

  23. [31]

    He, Xiaohan Yao, Robert Smith, Milo Sprague, Shunye Gao, Bahadur Singh, Hsin Lin, Su-Yang Xu, Fazel Tafti, Arun Bansil, and Madhab Neupane

    Anup Pradhan Sakhya, Cheng-Yi Huang, Gyanen- dra Dhakal, Xue-Jian Gao, Sabin Regmi, Baokai Wang, Wei Wen, R.-H. He, Xiaohan Yao, Robert Smith, Milo Sprague, Shunye Gao, Bahadur Singh, Hsin Lin, Su-Yang Xu, Fazel Tafti, Arun Bansil, and Madhab Neupane. Observation of Fermi arcs...

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    Torchinsky, Fazel Tafti, and Joseph Orenstein

    Yue Sun, Changmin Lee, Hung-Yu Yang, Darius H. Torchinsky, Fazel Tafti, and Joseph Orenstein. Mapping domain-wall topology in the magnetic Weyl semimetal CeAlSi.Phys. Rev. B, 104:235119, Dec 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.235119. URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB....

    2021 doi

  25. [33]

    Picoscale mag- netoelasticity governs heterogeneous magnetic domains in a noncentrosymmetric ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal

    Bochao Xu, Jacob Franklin, Amani Jayakody, Hung-Yu Yang, Fazel Tafti, and Ilya Sochnikov. Picoscale mag- netoelasticity governs heterogeneous magnetic domains in a noncentrosymmetric ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal. Advanced Quantum Technologies, 4(3), February 2021. ISSN 2511-90...

    2021 doi

  26. [34]

    Graf, Guangyong Xu, Yang Zhao, Christina M

    Hung-Yu Yang, Bahadur Singh, Jonathan Gaudet, Baozhu Lu, Cheng-Yi Huang, Wei-Chi Chiu, Shin- Ming Huang, Baokai Wang, Faranak Bahrami, Bochao Xu, Jacob Franklin, Ilya Sochnikov, David E. Graf, Guangyong Xu, Yang Zhao, Christina M. Hoffman, Hsin Lin, Darius H. Torchinsky, Colli...

    2021 doi

  27. [35]

    Kundu, Niraj Aryal, Emil S

    Antu Laha, Asish K. Kundu, Niraj Aryal, Emil S. Bozin, Juntao Yao, Sarah Paone, Anil Rajapitamahuni, Elio Vescovo, Tonica Valla, Milinda Abeykoon, Ran Jing, Weiguo Yin, Abhay N. Pasupathy, Mengkun Liu, and Qiang Li. Electronic structure and magnetic and trans- port properties ...

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    Exploration of quantum oscillation in antiferromagnetic Weyl semimetal GdSiAl.Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter, November 2024

    Priyanka Meena, Amarjyoti Choudhury, Mohit Mudgal, Sonika Bagga, Vishnu Kumar Tiwari, Sarita Rajput, C S Yadav, Vivek K Malik, Tulika Maitra, and Jayita Nayak. Exploration of quantum oscillation in antiferromagnetic Weyl semimetal GdSiAl.Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter,...

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    Pressure-induced superconductiv- 11 ity in the noncentrosymmetric Weyl semimetals LaAlX (X= Si,Ge).Phys

    Weizheng Cao, Ningning Zhao, Cuiying Pei, Qi Wang, Qinghua Zhang, Tianping Ying, Yi Zhao, Lingling Gao, Changhua Li, Na Yu, Lin Gu, Yulin Chen, Kai Liu, and Yanpeng Qi. Pressure-induced superconductiv- 11 ity in the noncentrosymmetric Weyl semimetals LaAlX (X= Si,Ge).Phys. Rev...

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    Origin and enhance- ment of the spin Hall angle in the Weyl semimetals LaAlSi and LaAlGe.Phys

    Truman Ng, Yongzheng Luo, Jiaren Yuan, Yihong Wu, Hyunsoo Yang, and Lei Shen. Origin and enhance- ment of the spin Hall angle in the Weyl semimetals LaAlSi and LaAlGe.Phys. Rev. B, 104:014412, Jul

  31. [39]

    Crystallographic defects in Weyl semimetal LaAlGe.Phys

    Inseo Kim, Byungkyun Kang, Hyunsoo Kim, and Minseok Choi. Crystallographic defects in Weyl semimetal LaAlGe.Phys. Rev. Mater., 8:054203, May 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.054203. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevMaterials.8.054203

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    Dhital, R

    C. Dhital, R. L. Dally, R. Ruvalcaba, R. Gonzalez- Hernandez, J. Guerrero-Sanchez, H. B. Cao, Q. Zhang, W. Tian, Y. Wu, M. D. Frontzek, S. K. Karna, A. Meads, B. Wilson, R. Chapai, D. Graf, J. Bacsa, R. Jin, and J. F. DiTusa. Multi-kmagnetic structure and large anomalous Hall ...

    2023 doi

  33. [41]

    Bulk physical properties of a magnetic Weyl semimetal candidate NdAlGe grown by a laser floating- zone method.Inorganics, 11(1):20, January 2023

    Naoki Kikugawa, Taichi Terashima, Takashi Kato, Momoko Hayashi, Hitoshi Yamaguchi, and Shinya Uji. Bulk physical properties of a magnetic Weyl semimetal candidate NdAlGe grown by a laser floating- zone method.Inorganics, 11(1):20, January 2023. ISSN 2304-6740. doi:10.3390/inor...

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    Correlation between non- centrosymmetic structure and magnetic properties in Weyl semimetal NdAlGe.Solid State Com- munications, 321:114041, November 2020

    Tai Wang, Yongquan Guo, Cong Wang, and Shuowang Yang. Correlation between non- centrosymmetic structure and magnetic properties in Weyl semimetal NdAlGe.Solid State Com- munications, 321:114041, November 2020. ISSN 0038-1098. doi:10.1016/j.ssc.2020.114041. URL http://dx.doi.or...

    2020

  35. [43]

    Aczel, Guangyong Xu, Hsin Lin, Arun Bansil, Ba- hadur Singh, and Fazel Tafti

    Hung-Yu Yang, Jonathan Gaudet, Rahul Verma, Santu Baidya, Faranak Bahrami, Xiaohan Yao, Cheng-Yi Huang, Lisa DeBeer-Schmitt, Adam A. Aczel, Guangyong Xu, Hsin Lin, Arun Bansil, Ba- hadur Singh, and Fazel Tafti. Stripe helical mag- netism and two regimes of anomalous Hall effec...

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    Field-induced tricritical phenomenon and magnetic structures in magnetic Weyl semimetal candidate NdAlGe.New Journal of Physics, 24(1):013010, January 2022

    Jun Zhao, Wei Liu, Azizur Rahman, Fanying Meng, Langsheng Ling, Chuanying Xi, Wei Tong, Yuming Bai, Zhaoming Tian, Yunbo Zhong, Ying Hu, Li Pi, Lei Zhang, and Yuheng Zhang. Field-induced tricritical phenomenon and magnetic structures in magnetic Weyl semimetal candidate NdAlGe...

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    Anomalous Hall effect in the magnetic Weyl semimetal NdAlGe with plateaus observed at low tempera- tures.Phys

    Naoki Kikugawa, Shinya Uji, and Taichi Terashima. Anomalous Hall effect in the magnetic Weyl semimetal NdAlGe with plateaus observed at low tempera- tures.Phys. Rev. B, 109:035143, Jan 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.035143. URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.035143

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.014412

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.014412. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.014412

    doi

  39. [47]

    Large anomalous Hall effect in ferro- magnetic Weyl semimetal candidate PrAlGe.APL Ma- terials, 7(5):051110, 05 2019

    Biao Meng, Hao Wu, Yang Qiu, Chunlei Wang, Yong Liu, Zhengcai Xia, Songliu Yuan, Haixin Chang, and Zhaoming Tian. Large anomalous Hall effect in ferro- magnetic Weyl semimetal candidate PrAlGe.APL Ma- terials, 7(5):051110, 05 2019. ISSN 2166-532X. doi: 10.1063/1.5090795. URLht...

    2019 doi

  40. [48]

    Sanchez, Guoqing Chang, Ilya Belopolski, Hong Lu, Jia-Xin Yin, Nasser Alidoust, Xitong Xu, Tyler A

    Daniel S. Sanchez, Guoqing Chang, Ilya Belopolski, Hong Lu, Jia-Xin Yin, Nasser Alidoust, Xitong Xu, Tyler A. Cochran, Xiao Zhang, Yi Bian, Songtian S. Zhang, Yi- Yuan Liu, Jie Ma, Guang Bian, Hsin Lin, Su-Yang Xu, Shuang Jia, and M. Zahid Hasan. Observation of Weyl fermions i...

    2020 doi

  41. [49]

    R. Yang, M. Corasaniti, C. C. Le, C. Yue, Z. Hu, J. P. Hu, C. Petrovic, and L. Degiorgi. Charge dynamics of a noncentrosymmetric magnetic Weyl semimetal.npj Quantum Materials, 7(1), October 2022. ISSN 2397-4648. doi:10.1038/s41535-022-00507-w. URLhttp://dx.doi. org/10.1038/s41...

    2022 doi

  42. [50]

    Large nonlinear optical magne- toelectric response in a noncentrosymmetric magnetic Weyl semimetal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(12), March 2024

    Kentaro Shoriki, Keigo Moriishi, Yoshihiro Okamura, Kohei Yokoi, Hidetomo Usui, Hiroshi Murakawa, Hideaki Sakai, Noriaki Hanasaki, Yoshinori Tokura, and Youtarou Takahashi. Large nonlinear optical magne- toelectric response in a noncentrosymmetric magnetic Weyl semimetal.Proce...

    2024 doi

  43. [51]

    Transi- tion from intrinsic to extrinsic anomalous Hall effect in the ferromagnetic weyl semimetal PrAlGe 1-xSix.APL Materials, 8(1):011111, 01 2020

    Hung-Yu Yang, Bahadur Singh, Baozhu Lu, Cheng- Yi Huang, Faranak Bahrami, Wei-Chi Chiu, David Graf, Shin-Ming Huang, Baokai Wang, Hsin Lin, Dar- ius Torchinsky, Arun Bansil, and Fazel Tafti. Transi- tion from intrinsic to extrinsic anomalous Hall effect in the ferromagnetic we...

    2020 doi

  44. [52]

    Nonsaturating mag- netoresistance, anomalous Hall effect, and magnetic quantum oscillations in the ferromagnetic semimetal PrAlSi.Phys

    Meng Lyu, Junsen Xiang, Zhenyu Mi, Hengcan Zhao, Zhen Wang, Enke Liu, Genfu Chen, Zhian Ren, Gang Li, and Peijie Sun. Nonsaturating mag- netoresistance, anomalous Hall effect, and magnetic quantum oscillations in the ferromagnetic semimetal PrAlSi.Phys. Rev. B, 102:085143, Aug...

    2020 doi

  45. [53]

    Field-induced Lifshitz transition in the magnetic Weyl semimetal can- didate PrAlSi.npj Quantum Materials, 8(1), jan 2023

    Lei Wu, Shengwei Chi, Huakun Zuo, Gang Xu, Lingxiao Zhao, Yongkang Luo, and Zengwei Zhu. Field-induced Lifshitz transition in the magnetic Weyl semimetal can- didate PrAlSi.npj Quantum Materials, 8(1), jan 2023. ISSN 2397-4648. doi:10.1038/s41535-023-00537-y. URL http://dx.doi...

    2023 doi

  46. [54]

    Tsirkin, Yang Xu, Titus Neupert, J

    Daniel Destraz, Lakshmi Das, Stepan S. Tsirkin, Yang Xu, Titus Neupert, J. Chang, A. Schilling, Adolfo G. Grushin, Joachim Kohlbrecher, Lukas Keller, Pascal Puphal, Ekaterina Pomjakushina, and Jonathan S. White. Magnetism and anomalous transport in the Weyl semimetal PrAlGe: p...

    2020 doi

  47. [55]

    Graf, Hung-Yu Yang, Faranak Bahrami, Ruiqi Zhang, Adam A

    Xiaohan Yao, Jonathan Gaudet, Rahul Verma, David E. Graf, Hung-Yu Yang, Faranak Bahrami, Ruiqi Zhang, Adam A. Aczel, Sujan Subedi, Darius H. Torchinsky, Jianwei Sun, Arun Bansil, Shin-Ming Huang, Bahadur Singh, Peter Blaha, Predrag Nikoli´ c, and Fazel Tafti. Large topological...

    2023 doi

  48. [56]

    Quantum oscillations in noncentrosymmetric Weyl semimetal SmAlSi.Chinese Physics Letters, 39(4): 047501, April 2022

    Weizheng Cao, Yunlong Su, Qi Wang, Cuiying Pei, Lin- gling Gao, Yi Zhao, Changhua Li, Na Yu, Jinghui Wang, Zhongkai Liu, Yulin Chen, Gang Li, Jun Li, and Yan- peng Qi. Quantum oscillations in noncentrosymmetric Weyl semimetal SmAlSi.Chinese Physics Letters, 39(4): 047501, Apri...

    2022 doi

  49. [57]

    Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations and nontrivial topologi- cal states in Weyl semimetal candidate SmAlSi.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 34(48):485701, October

    Longmeng Xu, Haoyu Niu, Yuming Bai, Haipeng Zhu, Songliu Yuan, Xiong He, Yibo Han, Lingxiao Zhao, Yang Yang, Zhengcai Xia, Qifeng Liang, and Zhaoming Tian. Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations and nontrivial topologi- cal states in Weyl semimetal candidate SmAlSi.Journal of Physics:...

  50. [58]

    Anomalous Hall effect in an antiferromagnetic CeGaSi single crys- tal.Phys

    Jing Gong, Huan Wang, Kun Han, Xiang-Yu Zeng, Xiao-Ping Ma, Yi-Ting Wang, Jun-Fa Lin, Xiao- Yan Wang, and Tian-Long Xia. Anomalous Hall effect in an antiferromagnetic CeGaSi single crys- tal.Phys. Rev. B, 109:024434, Jan 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.024434. URLhttps://link....

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    Multi-experimental determina- tion of magnetic transition in Weyl semimetalsRAlGe

    Hong Lu, Wentao Yang, Yuqing Huang, Yi Bian, Xiao Zhang, and Shuang Jia. Multi-experimental determina- tion of magnetic transition in Weyl semimetalsRAlGe. Materials Letters, 335:133819, March 2023. ISSN 0167- 577X. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2023.133819. URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.10...

    2023

  52. [60]

    Patrick, Julie B

    Juba Bouaziz, Gustav Bihlmayer, Christopher E. Patrick, Julie B. Staunton, and Stefan Bl¨ ugel. Origin of incommensurate magnetic order in the RAlSi magnetic Weyl semimetals (R= Pr,Nd,Sm). Phys. Rev. B, 109:L201108, May 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L201108. URLhttps://link....

    2024 doi

  53. [61]

    Comparative analysis of magnetoresistance in Weyl semimetalRAlSi.Journal of Materials Science, 59 (31):14653–14660, July 2024

    Hong Lu, Haotong Zang, Xiao Ren, Xuheng He, Va- leria Rodionova, Eryun Yan, and Kurban Magome- dov. Comparative analysis of magnetoresistance in Weyl semimetalRAlSi.Journal of Materials Science, 59 (31):14653–14660, July 2024. ISSN 1573-4803. doi: 10.1007/s10853-024-10035-6. U...

    2024 doi

  54. [62]

    Sig- nature of weakly coupledfelectrons and conduction electrons in magnetic Weyl semimetal candidates PrAlSi and SmAlSi.Physical Review B, 107(3), January 2023

    Rui Lou, Alexander Fedorov, Lingxiao Zhao, Alexander Yaresko, Bernd B¨ uchner, and Sergey Borisenko. Sig- nature of weakly coupledfelectrons and conduction electrons in magnetic Weyl semimetal candidates PrAlSi and SmAlSi.Physical Review B, 107(3), January 2023. ISSN 2469-9969...

    2023 doi

  55. [63]

    Dhar, S.M

    S.K. Dhar, S.M. Pattalwar, and R. Vijayaraghavan. Magnetic and thermal behavior of CeAlX(X=Si and Ge) compounds.Journal of Magnetism and Mag- netic Materials, 104-107:1303–1304, 1992. ISSN 0304-

    1992

  56. [64]

    Crystal struc- tural refinement for NdAlSi.Rare Metals, 25(4):355–358, August 2006

    W He, J Zhang, L Zeng, and Y Zhuang. Crystal struc- tural refinement for NdAlSi.Rare Metals, 25(4):355–358, August 2006. ISSN 1001-0521. doi:10.1016/s1001- 0521(06)60067-3. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S1001-0521(06)60067-3

    2006 doi

  57. [65]

    P. J. Brown, A. G. Fox, E. N. Maslen, M. A. O’Keefe, and B. T. M. Willis.Intensity of diffracted inten- sities, page 554–595. International Union of Crys- tallography, October 2006. ISBN 9781402054082. doi:10.1107/97809553602060000600. URLhttps://it. iucr.org/Cb/ch6o1v0001/

    2006 doi

  58. [66]

    doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ac987a

    ISSN 1361-648X. doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ac987a. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ac987a

    doi

  59. [67]

    Equiatomic cerium intermetallics CeXX ′ with two p elements

    Rainer P¨ ottgen and Bernard Chevalier. Equiatomic cerium intermetallics CeXX ′ with two p elements. Zeitschrift f¨ ur Naturforschung B, 70(10):695–704, 2015. doi:doi:10.1515/znb-2015-0109. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1515/znb-2015-0109

    2015 doi

  60. [68]

    Dhar, S.M

    S.K. Dhar, S.M. Pattalwar, and R. Vijayaraghavan. CeGeGa—a ferromagnetic dense Kondo system.Physica B: Condensed Matter, 186–188:491–493, may 1993. ISSN 0921-4526. doi:10.1016/0921-4526(93)90613-b. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-4526(93)90613-B

    1993 doi

  61. [69]

    Magnetic, thermodynamic, and magne- totransport properties of CeGaGe and PrGaGe single crystals.Phys

    Daloo Ram, Sudip Malick, Zakir Hossain, and Dariusz Kaczorowski. Magnetic, thermodynamic, and magne- totransport properties of CeGaGe and PrGaGe single crystals.Phys. Rev. B, 108:024428, Jul 2023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.024428. URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB....

    2023 doi

  62. [70]

    H. M. Rietveld. A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures.Journal of Applied Crystal- lography, 2(2):65–71, June 1969. ISSN 0021-8898. doi: 10.1107/s0021889869006558. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1107/S0021889869006558

    1969 doi

  63. [71]

    J. T. Zhao and E. Parth´ e. Structure of YAlGe and iso- typic rare-earth–aluminium germanides.Acta Crystal- lographica Section C Crystal Structure Communications, 46(12):2276–2279, December 1990. ISSN 0108-2701. doi: 10.1107/s0108270190005571. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1107/S01...

    1990 doi

  64. [72]

    [Accessed 16-07-2024]

    Neutron scattering lengths and cross sections — ncnr.nist.gov.https://www.ncnr.nist.gov/resources/ n-lengths/, 2021. [Accessed 16-07-2024]. [73]See Supplemental Material at [link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.184102] for details of the energy dispersive X-ray spect...

    2021 doi

  65. [74]

    Digital Pulse Processing and Pile Up Correction for Accurate Interpretation of High Rate 13 SDD Spectrum Images.Microscopy and Microanaly- sis, 13(S02):1428–1429, 08 2007

    P Statham. Digital Pulse Processing and Pile Up Correction for Accurate Interpretation of High Rate 13 SDD Spectrum Images.Microscopy and Microanaly- sis, 13(S02):1428–1429, 08 2007. ISSN 1431-9276. doi: 10.1017/S1431927607073242. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1017/S1431927607073242

    2007 doi

  66. [75]

    Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction

    Juan Rodr ´ ıguez-Carvajal. Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 192(1–2):55–69, October

  67. [76]

    Crystallographic informa- tion for the refinement to theP4 3 structure can be found in Table S-III in the Supplemental Material [73]

    since point inversion of a chiral structure transforms it to its enantiomer [90, 91]. Crystallographic informa- tion for the refinement to theP4 3 structure can be found in Table S-III in the Supplemental Material [73]. The difference betweenI4 1mdandP4 3 (orP4 1) is ex- treme...

  68. [77]

    Yu.N. Grin, P. Rogl, B. Chevalier, A.A. Fedorchuk, and I.A. Gryniv. Physical properties of binary cerium gal- lides and ternary cerium-germanium gallides.Journal of the Less Common Metals, 167(2):365–371, 1991. doi: 10.1016/0022-5088(91)90289-G

    1991 doi

  69. [78]

    Freddie Akeroyd, Stuart Ansell, Sofia Antony, Owen Arnold, Arturs Bekasovs, Jean Bilheux, Jose Borreguero, Keith Brown, Alex Buts, Stuart Campbell, Dickon Champion, Laurent Chapon, Matt Clarke, Stephen Cot- trell, Robert Dalgliesh, David Dillow, Mathieu Doucet, Nick Draper, Ro...

    2013

  70. [79]

    Peterson

    Robert Applin, Rachel Baust, Adrian Diaz-Alvarez, Caila Finn, Sarah Foxley, Jonathan Haigh, Thomas Hampson, and Peter F. Peterson. Mantid 6.9.1: Ma- nipulation and analysis toolkit for instrument data.,

  71. [80]

    Scale, atomic position, anisotropic thermal parameters, occupancy, and extinction were refined for models withI4 1mdandI4 1/amdsymmetries

    software. Scale, atomic position, anisotropic thermal parameters, occupancy, and extinction were refined for models withI4 1mdandI4 1/amdsymmetries. When the refinement is carried out with site exchange in a model withI4 1mdsymmetry, there is<3% site exchange be- tween Ga and ...

  72. [81]

    Varley F. Sears. Neutron scattering lengths and cross sections.Neutron News, 3(3):26–37, 1992. doi: 10.1080/10448639208218770. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1080/10448639208218770

    1992 doi

  73. [82]

    https://www.ncnr.nist.gov/resources/activation/ resonance.html

    Thermal neutron resonances — ncnr.nist.gov. https://www.ncnr.nist.gov/resources/activation/ resonance.html. [Accessed 14-11-2024]

    2024

  74. [83]

    APEX3, SAINT, and SADABS.Madi- son, WI, USA, 2016

    Bruker AXS Inc. APEX3, SAINT, and SADABS.Madi- son, WI, USA, 2016

    2016

  75. [84]

    An empirical correction for the influence of low- energy contamination.Journal of Applied Crystallogra- phy, 48(6):1907–1913, November 2015

    Lennard Krause, Regine Herbst-Irmer, and Dietmar Stalke. An empirical correction for the influence of low- energy contamination.Journal of Applied Crystallogra- phy, 48(6):1907–1913, November 2015. ISSN 1600-5767. doi:10.1107/s1600576715020440. URLhttp://dx.doi. org/10.1107/S1...

    1907 doi

  76. [85]

    Sheldrick

    George M. Sheldrick. SHELXT– integrated space- group and crystal-structure determination.Acta Crys- tallographica Section A Foundations and Advances, 71(1):3–8, January 2015. ISSN 2053-2733. doi: 10.1107/s2053273314026370. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1107/S2053273314026370

    2015 doi

  77. [86]

    M. I. Aroyo, H. Burzlaff, G. Chapuis, W. Fischer, H. D. Flack, A. M. Glazer, H. Grimmer, B. Gruber, Th. Hahn, H. Klapper, E. Koch, P. Kostantinov, V. Kopsk´ y, D. B. Litvin, A. Looijenga-Vos, K. Momma, U. M¨ uller, U. Shmueli, B. Souvignier, J. C. H. Spence, P. M. de Wolff, H....

    2016

  78. [87]

    Coates, H

    L. Coates, H. B. Cao, B. C. Chakoumakos, M. D. Frontzek, C. Hoffmann, A. Y. Kovalevsky, Y. Liu, F. Meilleur, A. M. dos Santos, D. A. A. Myles, X. P. Wang, and F. Ye. A suite-level review of the neutron single-crystal diffraction instruments at Oak Ridge National Laboratory.Rev...

    2018 doi

  79. [88]

    W¨ ohler and H

    F. W¨ ohler and H. Sainte-Claire Deville. Ueber das bor.Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie, 101(3): 347–355, January 1857. ISSN 0075-4617. doi: 10.1002/jlac.18571010317. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/jlac.18571010317

    doi

  80. [89]

    P. C. Canfield and Z. Fisk. Growth of single crys- tals from metallic fluxes.Philosophical Magazine B, 65(6):1117–1123, June 1992. ISSN 1463-6417. doi: 10.1080/13642819208215073. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/13642819208215073

    1992 doi

  81. [90]

    Hillard, and Michel Giorgi

    ´Angela Valent ´ ın-P´ erez, Patrick Rosa, Elizabeth A. Hillard, and Michel Giorgi. Chirality determination in crystals.Chirality, 34(2):163–181, November 2021. ISSN 1520-636X. doi:10.1002/chir.23377. URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1002/chir.23377

    2021 doi

  82. [91]

    Toby and Robert B

    Brian H. Toby and Robert B. Von Dreele. GSAS-II: the genesis of a modern open-source all purpose crystallog- raphy software package.Journal of Applied Crystallog- raphy, 46(2):544–549, March 2013. ISSN 0021-8898. doi: 10.1107/s0021889813003531. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1107/S0...

    2013 doi

  83. [92]

    Thermal cross sections

    S F Mughabghab. Thermal cross sections. InAtlas of Neutron Resonances, pages 1–16. Elsevier, 2018

    2018

  84. [97]

    Sheldrick

    George M. Sheldrick. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.Acta Crystallographica Section C Structural Chemistry, 71(1):3–8, January 2015. ISSN 2053-2296. doi:10.1107/s2053229614024218. URLhttp://dx.doi. org/10.1107/S2053229614024218

    2015 doi

  85. [98]

    H. D. Flack. On enantiomorph-polarity estimation. Acta Crystallographica Section A, 39(6):876–881, Nov

  86. [103]

    Determination of absolute configura- tion using X-ray diffraction.Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 28(10):1304–1313, October 2017

    Simon Parsons. Determination of absolute configura- tion using X-ray diffraction.Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 28(10):1304–1313, October 2017. ISSN 0957-4166. doi: 10.1016/j.tetasy.2017.08.018. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tetasy.2017.08.018

    2017 doi

  87. [104]

    Flandorfer, D

    H. Flandorfer, D. Kaczorowski, J. Gr¨ obner, P. Rogl, R. Wouters, C. Godart, and A. Kostikas. The systems Ce–Al–(Si, Ge): Phase equilibria and physical proper- ties.Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 137(2):191–205, May 1998. ISSN 0022-4596. doi:10.1006/jssc.1997.7660. URLhttp:...

    1998

  88. [141]

    The difference betweenI4 1mdandI4 1/amdin the con- text of these materials is the positioning of theXandZ atoms in the structure

    based on powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) mea- surements. The difference betweenI4 1mdandI4 1/amdin the con- text of these materials is the positioning of theXandZ atoms in the structure. With noncentrosymmetricI4 1md symmetry, theXandZatoms occupy distinct crystal- lographic s...

  89. [1564]

    URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013068

    doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.013068. URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013068

    doi

  90. [1983]

    URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1107/S0108767383001762

    doi:10.1107/S0108767383001762. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1107/S0108767383001762

    doi

  91. [1993]

    doi:10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108- i

    ISSN 0921-4526. doi:10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108- i. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-4526(93) 90108-I

    doi

  92. [2021]

    doi:10.1038/s41563-021-01062-8

    doi

  93. [2022]

    URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.235102

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.235102. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.235102

    doi

  94. [2023]

    URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L161106

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L161106. URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L161106

    doi

  95. [2024]

    URLhttp://docs.mantidproject.org/v6.9.1/ release/v6.9.1/index.html

  96. [8853]

    URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/030488539290593D

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(92)90593- D. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/030488539290593D. Proceedings of the In- ternational Conference on Magnetism, Part II

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.