REVIEW 2 cited by
Towards Replication-Robust Analytics Markets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Despite recent advancements in machine learning, in practice, relevant datasets are often distributed among market competitors who are reluctant to share. To incentivize data sharing, recent works propose analytics markets, where multiple agents share features and are rewarded for improving the predictions of others. These rewards can be computed by treating features as players in a coalitional game, with solution concepts that yield desirable market properties. However, this setup incites agents to strategically replicate their data and act under multiple false identities to increase their own revenue and diminish that of others, limiting the viability of such markets in practice. In this work, we develop an analytics market robust to such strategic replication for supervised learning problems. We adopt Pearl's do-calculus from causal inference to refine the coalitional game by differentiating between observational and interventional conditional probabilities. As a result, we derive rewards that are replication-robust by design.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Selling Information in Games with Externalities
In a binary two-player game where the informed seller competes with a privately informed buyer, the profit-maximizing menu sells full information or none, and above a competition threshold the seller optimally sells n...
-
Budget-constrained Collaborative Renewable Energy Forecasting Market
A bid-constrained spline LASSO market lets renewable forecast buyers set budgets and sellers set feature prices, improving wind forecast RMSE by over 10% while paying data providers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.