Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 39 references

Gallium phosphide on insulator for nanophotonics and quantum technologies

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that ion-sliced gallium phosphide films, after annealing and polishing, act optically like bulk single-crystal GaP while preserving the crystal's second-order nonlinearity, opening a scalable GaP-on-insulator route for

desk verdict Ion-sliced GaP-on-insulator: real fabrication advance, but the nonlinear claims outrun the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02328 v1 pith:OBKLCVHD submitted 2026-08-03 physics.optics cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Tobias Bucher , Otto Arnold , Muyi Yang , Zifei Zhang , Katsuya Tanaka , Annkathrin Köhler , Berit Marx-Glowna , Duk-Yong Choi
show 2 more authors
Isabelle Staude Carsten Ronning
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 42.65.Ky42.70.-a
keywords galliumphosphideoninsulatorionslicingheliumimplantationwaferbondingsecond-harmonicgenerationzinc-blendenonlinearitynanophotonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is trying to show that helium ion-slicing, the method used to make silicon-on-insulator wafers, can be applied to gallium phosphide to yield thin single-crystalline films bonded onto transparent insulator substrates. It claims that a 500 °C anneal plus argon-ion polishing removes most implantation damage, bringing the films' linear absorption and refractive index close to bulk GaP values. It further claims that a (110)-oriented film reproduces the exact polarization dependence of second-harmonic generation predicted by the zinc-blende second-order susceptibility tensor, so the nonlinear response is nearly pristine. A sympathetic reader would care because this combination, high index contrast, low loss, and intact second-order nonlinearity on an insulating host, is what integrated visible and near-infrared nonlinear and quantum photonic devices have been missing.

What carries the argument

The enabling mechanism is helium ion-slicing: implanted He ions create a buried layer of damage and gas bubbles that defines a cleavage plane, and wafer bonding followed by heating makes the crystal split along that plane, leaving a thin film on the host. The central verification object is the (110) zinc-blende second-order susceptibility tensor, which dictates a specific polarization-dependent second-harmonic pattern; matching that pattern is what certifies that the transferred film retains both its orientation and its nonlinear optical identity. Annealing at 500 °C and 400 eV Ar+ ion milling are the auxiliary steps that restore crystallinity and smooth the exfoliated surface.

What would settle it

Profile the implanted helium and defect distribution in an as-implanted, un-split GaP crystal by cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy and secondary-ion mass spectrometry. If the damage tail reaches more than about 150 nm below the exfoliation surface, or if the cleavage plane does not sit just beyond the damage peak, then the post-polish film would retain defect-related absorption and the measured bulk-like transmission and SHG pattern would not generalize.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that ion-sliced GaP-on-insulator substrates can be made with the crystallinity and optical behavior of bulk GaP. Using 100 keV He+ implantation at a fluence of 5×10^16 cm^-2, anodic or plasma-activated wafer bonding, and exfoliation at 350–400 °C, the authors transfer roughly 600–700 nm GaP films onto glass, fused silica, or silicon. Structural measurements show the films remain single-crystalline, and annealing at 500 °C restores the lattice and cuts the implantation-induced absorption. The key result is the (110) film's second-harmonic signal: its measured polarization pattern follows the theoretical response of a (110) zinc-blende crystal

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the assumption that the simulated helium and damage profile correctly places the cleavage plane around 600 nm and confines the worst damage to the top roughly 150 nm of the transferred film; if the damage actually extends much deeper, the remaining film after polishing would be thinner or lower quality than the paper's bulk-approaching optics require.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • GaP-on-insulator substrates can be produced in (100), (110), and (111) orientations on multiple host substrates, so devices can be built on whichever crystal cut is best for the nonlinear process.
  • Annealed films show refractive index and extinction coefficient close to bulk GaP, making the platform usable for low-loss waveguides and resonators in the visible-to-near-infrared range.
  • The preserved zinc-blende second-order response in transferred films implies that the platform can support second-harmonic generation and, by extension, spontaneous parametric down-conversion for photon-pair sources.
  • Plasma-activated direct bonding offers a CMOS-compatible route, so the process is not restricted to alkali-glass anodic bonding.
  • Post-bonding annealing plus polishing reduces surface roughness from roughly 12 nm RMS to 4 nm RMS, a step toward low-scatter integrated devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the intact second-order susceptibility is confirmed in a waveguide geometry, the platform should be able to host integrated SPDC sources without the epitaxial growth and substrate-removal steps currently needed for GaP-on-insulator.
  • Editorial inference: the need to remove a damaged surface layer caps the usable film thickness below the exfoliated 600–700 nm; a testable extension would be to implant at higher energy or under channeling conditions to see whether thicker, high-quality films can be transferred.
  • Editorial inference: the close match between measured and modeled transmittance suggests that residual scattering, not bulk absorption, may be the next loss ceiling; measuring propagation loss in a patterned ring resonator would separate the two.
  • Editorial inference: because the Monte Carlo model under-predicted the splitting depth, residual ion channeling likely extends the helium profile deeper than the amorphous-target picture; this could be used deliberately to tune film thickness with energy and angle.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the fabrication of gallium-phosphide-on-insulator (GOI) substrates by He+ ion implantation, wafer bonding, and layer exfoliation. The authors demonstrate transfer of (100)-, (110)-, and (111)-oriented GaP films onto borosilicate glass, fused silica, and silicon using anodic and plasma-activated direct bonding. The transferred films are characterized by RBS/C, XRD, AFM, spectroscopic ellipsometry, transmittance, and polarization-resolved SHG. The central claims are that the transferred layers retain single-crystalline order, that annealing at 500 °C and Ar-ion polishing restore linear optical properties approaching bulk GaP, and that the SHG polarization response of a (110) film indicates a near-pristine second-order nonlinear response.

Significance. If fully substantiated, this work would provide a scalable and orientation-flexible GOI platform relevant to integrated nonlinear and quantum photonics. The manuscript has clear strengths: the structural characterization is multi-technique and uses external benchmarks where possible (literature bulk GaP optical constants for the transfer-matrix transmittance model; the parameter-free zinc-blende χ(2) tensor for the SHG polarization pattern), rather than fitting the model to the data. The combination of RBS/C, XRD, and optical measurements gives convergent evidence that the ion-slicing process preserves crystalline order to a useful degree. The principal weakness is that the headline nonlinear-optical claim — a "near-pristine" second-order response — rests on a polarization-pattern symmetry test that is inherently insensitive to the absolute value of χ(2), and no bulk reference or extracted nonlinear coefficient is provided.

major comments (2)
  1. [Optical Properties, Fig. 3(e) and Conclusion] The claim that the nonlinear response is "near-pristine" or "approaches that of pristine bulk GaP" (Abstract, §Optical Properties, and Conclusion) is not supported by the SHG data as presented. Figure 3(e) shows normalized SHG intensity versus polarization angle, and Figure 3(d) shows a quadratic power dependence. Both are consistent with, but only test, the symmetry and coherence of the nonlinear process. The polarization pattern is insensitive to the magnitude of the effective nonlinear coefficient: residual implantation damage, strain, or partial disorder can strongly suppress d_eff while leaving the angle dependence unchanged. To support the magnitude claim, the authors should either (i) measure SHG from a bulk (110) GaP reference under identical conditions and compare absolute or ratioed intensities, or (ii) extract an absolute conversion efficiency or d_eff value and compare it wit
  2. [Structural Analysis / Annealing and Polishing] The statement that the implantation-damaged layer "is confined to approximately the upper 150 nm of the film, [so] it can be removed by subsequent etching and polishing" is not directly verified for the polished films. The RBS/C data in Fig. 2(a) are for an as-bonded film; XRD in Fig. 2(b) is before and after annealing; AFM in Fig. 2(c,d) is before and after ion milling. No RBS/C, XRD, or equivalent structural measurement is reported after the final polishing step, and the linear-optical characterization in Fig. 3(a) is explicitly stated to be on a sample "before polishing." Since the polished film is the deliverable for device integration, the authors should either provide post-polish structural/optical data or clearly separate the claims for the annealed versus the annealed-and-polished states.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Results, Ion Irradiation and Wafer Bonding] The text says the splitting depth and exfoliation behavior are "tailored by controlling the He+ ion implantation energy and fluence," but only one implantation condition (100 keV, 5×10^16 cm^-2) is demonstrated in the main text. Please either show data for a second energy/fluence or rephrase to "can be tailored" as a forward-looking statement.
  2. [Optical Properties, Fig. 3(a)] The statement that the annealed transmittance "closely follows" the transfer-matrix calculation using bulk GaP constants is qualitative. A quantitative metric — e.g., the wavelength range over which the residual deviation is below a stated threshold, or a fitted residual absorption coefficient — would strengthen the claim of linear optical quality approaching bulk.
  3. [Structural Analysis, Fig. 2(a)] The RBS/C channeling contrast is described qualitatively as "pronounced reduction." Reporting the minimum yield (χ_min) in the deeper, better-ordered region would provide a quantitative, comparable measure of crystalline quality.
  4. [Results, Film thickness] The RBS simulation gives approximately 595 nm film thickness, while SEM cross-sections show 600–700 nm. This discrepancy may reflect sample-to-sample variation or measurement geometry, but it is worth a sentence of discussion since thickness uniformity is relevant for nanophotonic device design.
  5. [Acknowledgments] Typo: "assistence" should be "assistance."

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all central benchmarks are external and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The fabrication and characterization chain is experimental and uses external, parameter-free benchmarks. RBS/C channeling is compared with simulated RBS spectra; XRD is compared with bulk GaP crystals; ellipsometry and transmittance are compared with literature bulk GaP optical constants of Aspnes & Studna (ref [37]) via a transfer-matrix calculation; SHG polarization is compared with the analytic zinc-blende (110) susceptibility tensor (ref [13]) and a quadratic power law. None of these benchmarks are functions of parameters fitted to the data being predicted, and the only free geometric parameter (634 nm film thickness) is a film property, not the optical constants under test. The SHG measurement validates crystal symmetry and orientation; the wording 'near-pristine... nonlinear response' is stronger than the normalized polarization data alone can prove regarding the magnitude of chi^(2), but that is an evidentiary-strength caveat, not a circular derivation. The acknowledged SRIM/cleavage-depth uncertainty ('Direct depth profiling would be required to clarify the relationship between the He distribution, implantation-induced damage, and cleavage-plane formation, which lies beyond the scope of the present work.') is a stated limitation, not a self-referential input. The only overlapping-author citation (ref [15], background on GaP frequency conversion) is not load-bearing for any central claim. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input, so there is no specific circular step to report.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Experimental fabrication paper with no invented entities and no fitted constitutive model. The SHG theory curve is parameter-free (zinc-blende tensor, single nonzero element d14) and the transmittance comparison uses literature bulk GaP constants. Load-bearing inputs are hand-chosen process conditions (implantation, anneal, milling) and the unverified SRIM depth model; the 634 nm film thickness used in the transfer-matrix comparison is the only potentially fitted number, and its source is not stated.

free parameters (4)
  • He+ implantation energy = 100 keV
    Single hand-chosen process condition. The abstract claims splitting depth is tailored by varying energy and fluence, but no energy sweep is presented (Results, Ion Irradiation and Wafer Bonding; Experimental Section).
  • He+ implantation fluence = 5×10^16 cm^-2
    Single hand-chosen condition; no fluence dependence or exfoliation-yield data are shown, despite the abstract's 'tailored by controlling... fluence' claim.
  • Annealing temperature and duration = 500 °C, 210 min
    Hand-chosen recovery conditions; no optimization curve shown, and no post-anneal interfacial integrity check (adhesion/blister test) is presented to verify the film-glass bond survives.
  • Effective film thickness for transfer-matrix transmittance = 634 nm
    Used to compute the reference transmittance curve in Fig. 3(a); the origin of 634 nm (RBS gives ~595 nm, SEM 600–700 nm) is not stated. If adjusted to match the spectrum, it is a fit parameter; it affects the comparison curve, not the central claim.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption SRIM amorphous-target model adequately predicts the He+ implantation and vacancy depth profile in crystalline GaP
    Used to select the 100 keV/5×10^16 conditions and expected ~600 nm splitting depth (Fig. 1(b)); the paper reports measured film thicknesses of 600–700 nm exceeding the SRIM prediction and concedes 'direct depth profiling would be required' to clarify He distribution vs. cleavage (text after Fig. 1(f)).
  • domain assumption Helium-induced exfoliation mechanism established for Si/LiNbO3/SiC/GaN transfers to GaP
    The paper states 'the microscopic mechanisms governing helium-induced exfoliation have not yet been investigated in comparable detail for GaP' (Results, Ion Irradiation and Wafer Bonding).
  • domain assumption Zinc-blende χ(2) tensor of GaP with only d14 nonzero is unchanged by the transfer process
    Used to compute the theoretical SHG polarization pattern (Fig. 3(e), Fig. S2); the pattern match is the evidence, but the tensor form is assumed from bulk GaP and the fit is normalized.
  • domain assumption Annealing at 500 °C restores lattice order without degrading the bonded interface or the glass substrate
    XRD shows lattice recovery (Fig. 2(b)), but no interfacial integrity check after annealing is reported; the optical and structural results could be confounded if the interface degraded.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gallium phosphide on insulator for nanophotonics and quantum technologies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OBKLCVHD

@misc{pith2026260802328,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gallium phosphide on insulator for nanophotonics and quantum technologies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OBKLCVHD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02328}
}
abstract

Gallium phosphide is a promising material platform for visible and near-infrared photonics and quantum technologies owing to its high refractive index, low optical absorption, and strong second-order nonlinearity. Here, we demonstrate the fabrication of GaP-on-insulator substrates by ion slicing. The splitting depth and exfoliation behavior of bulk GaP are tailored by controlling the He$^{+}$ ion implantation energy and fluence, enabling thin-film transfer onto amorphous substrates by anodic bonding and plasma-enhanced direct wafer bonding. Channeling Rutherford backscattering spectrometry and X-ray diffraction confirm that the transferred layers retain their single-crystalline structure, while implantation-induced disorder and optical absorption are substantially reduced by annealing at 500 {\deg}C and subsequent polishing. The annealed films exhibit linear optical properties approaching those of bulk GaP. In addition, a (110)-oriented GaP thin film shows the characteristic polarization dependence expected from the zinc-blende second-order nonlinear susceptibility tensor, demonstrating a near-pristine second-order nonlinear response. This flexible fabrication approach enables the integration of high-quality single-crystalline GaP with variable orientation for free-space and integrated nanophotonics as well as nonlinear and quantum optical devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02328 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Schematic for the ion-slicing of GaP using He+-ions, showing ion irradiation (top), wafer bonding (middle), and splitting (bottom). (b) Depth-dependent static vacancy (left axis) and He-ion (right axis) concentration profile for GaP irradiated by 100 keV He+-ions with a fluence of 5×1016 cm−2 . (c) Photograph of typical GaP samples before (left) and after (right) ion irradiation. (d) Photograph of a typical as-b… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Measured RBS spectra in random (black circles) and channeling (blue circles) geometry for a GOI substrate fabricated by anodic bonding. (b) XRD spectra of the (200) (left) and (400) (right) Bragg peaks of GaP measured for bulk GaP (black curves) and GOI substrates before (red curves) and after annealing (green curves). Atomic force microscopy measurements of a GOI substrate (c) before and (d) after ion beam milling.… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) shows the measured linear transmittance spectra of an as-bonded (red curve) and an annealed (green curve) GOI substrate before polishing. Both spectra exhibit the charac￾teristic Fabry-Pérot oscillations of a layered thin-film structure. The as-bonded sample shows a comparatively low overall transmittance, consistent with its dark brown appearance in the photograph (inset, red frame), indicating a broadband abso… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references

  1. [30]

    Carlson, Saoud A

    Maanav Ganjoo, John A. Carlson, Saoud A. Al-Mulla, James Brown, Brian T. Cunningham, and John M. Dallesasse. Transfer of Thin Film Gallium Phosphide onto Glass for Integrable Optical Filters. In CS MANTECH 2020: 2020 International Conference on Compound Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology, Digest of Papers , pages 5–8. CS MANTECH, 2020

    2020

  2. [1]

    J. W. Wang, F. Sciarrino, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson. Integrated photonic quantum technologies. Nature Photonics , 14(5):273––284, 2020

    2020

  3. [2]

    A. W. Elshaari, W. Pernice, K. Srinivasan, O. Benson, and V. Zwiller. Hybrid integrated quantum photonic circuits. Nature Photonics , 14(5):285––298, 2020

    2020

  4. [3]

    Pelucchi, G

    E. Pelucchi, G. Fagas, I. Aharonovich, D. Englund, E. Figueroa, Q. H. Gong, H. Hannes, J. Liu, C. Y. Lu, N. Matsuda, J. W. Pan, F. Schreck, F. Sciarrino, C. Silberhorn, J. W. Wang, and K. D. Jöns. The potential and global outlook of integrated photonics for quantum technologies. Nature Reviews Physics , 4(3):194––208, 2022

    2022

  5. [4]

    A. Dutt, A. Mohanty, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson. Nonlinear and quantum photonics using integrated optical materials. Nature Reviews Materials , 9(5):321––346, 2024

    2024

  6. [5]

    Caspani, C

    L. Caspani, C. L. Xiong, B. J. Eggleton, D. Bajoni, M. Liscidini, M. Galli, R. Morandotti, and D. J. Moss. Integrated sources of photon quantum states based on nonlinear optics. Light-Science & Applications , 6, 2017. 9

    2017

  7. [6]

    X. D. Shi, S. S. Mohanraj, V. Dhyani, A. A. Baiju, S. H. Wang, J. P. Sun, L. Zhou, A. Paterova, V. Leong, and D. Zhu. Efficient photon-pair generation in layer-poled lithium niobate nanophotonic waveguides. Light-Science & Applications , 13(1), 2024

    2024

  8. [7]

    M. A. Weissflog, R. Dezert, V. Vinel, C. Gigli, G. Leo, T. Pertsch, F. Setzpfandt, A. Borne, and S. Saravi. Nonlinear nanoresonators for Bell state generation. Applied Physics Reviews, 11(1), 2024

    2024

Show all 39 references
  1. [8]

    T. M. Fan, Y. L. Tang, S. Lung, M. Weissflog, J. Y. Ma, S. Shinde, S. Saravi, M. Nauman, W. K. Yang, H. Qin, S. Y. Qiu, A. A. Sukhorukov, Y. R. Lu, and F. Setzpfandt. Enhanced Photon-Pair Generation from a van der Waals Metasurface. Nano Letters , 25(31):11844–– 11851, 2025

    2025

  2. [9]

    Y. F. Wang, Z. Y. Pan, Y. X. Yan, Y. T. Yang, W. H. Zhao, N. Ding, X. Y. Tang, P. Z. Wu, Q. C. Zhao, and Y. Li. A review of gallium phosphide nanophotonics towards omnipotent nonlinear devices. Nanophotonics, 13(18):3207–3252, 2024

    2024

  3. [10]

    Cambiasso, G

    J. Cambiasso, G. Grinblat, Y. Li, A. Rakovich, E. Cortés, and S. A. Maier. Bridging the Gap between Dielectric Nanophotonics and the Visible Regime with Effectively Lossless Gallium Phosphide Antennas. Nano Letters , 17(2):1219–1225, 2017

    2017

  4. [11]

    D. J. Wilson, K. Schneider, S. Hönl, M. Anderson, Y. Baumgartner, L. Czornomaz, T. J. Kippenberg, and P. Seidler. Integrated gallium phosphide nonlinear photonics. Nature Photonics, 14(1):57–62, 2020

    2020

  5. [12]

    Kuznetsov, A

    N. Kuznetsov, A. Nardi, J. Riemensberger, A. Davydova, M. Churaev, P. Seidler, and T. J. Kippenberg. An ultra-broadband photonic-chip-based parametric amplifier. Nature, 639(8056), 2025

    2025

  6. [13]

    A. P. Anthur, H. Z. Zhang, Y. Akimov, J. R. Ong, D. Kalashnikov, A. Kuznetsov, and L. Krivitsky. Second harmonic generation in gallium phosphide nano-waveguides. Optics Express, 29(7):10307–10320, 2021

    2021

  7. [14]

    A. P. Anthur, H. Z. Zhang, R. Paniagua-Dominguez, D. A. Kalashnikov, S. T. Ha, T. W. W. Mass, A. Kuznetsov, and L. Krivitsky. Continuous Wave Second Harmonic Generation Enabled by Quasi- Bound-States in the Continuum on Gallium Phosphide Metasurfaces. Nano Letters , 20(12):874...

    2020

  8. [15]

    M. Y. Yang, M. A. Weissflog, Z. Fedorova, A. I. Barreda, S. Boerner, F. Eilenberger, T. Pertsch, and I. Staude. Second harmonic generation in monolithic gallium phosphide metasurfaces. Nanophotonics, 13(18):3311–3319, 2024

    2024

  9. [16]

    W. L. Xie, A. Martin, G. Beaudoin, I. Sagnes, F. Bretenaker, S. Combrié, F. Raineri, and A. De Rossi. Nonlinear response of a gallium phosphide nanopatterned photonic waveguide in the CW regime. Optics Letters , 44(11):2823–2826, 2019

    2019

  10. [17]

    Stockill, M

    R. Stockill, M. Forsch, F. Hijazi, G. Beaudoin, K. Pantzas, I. Sagnes, R. Braive, and S. Gröblacher. Ultra-low-noise microwave to optics conversion in gallium phosphide. Nature Communications, 13(1):6583, 2022

    2022

  11. [18]

    Tilmann, G

    B. Tilmann, G. Grinblat, R. Berté, M. Özcan, V. F. Kunzelmann, B. Nickel, I. D. Sharp, E. Cortés, S. A. Maier, and Y. Li. Nanostructured amorphous gallium phosphide on silica for nonlinear and ultrafast nanophotonics. Nanoscale Horizons , 5(11):1500–1508, 2020

    2020

  12. [19]

    Rivoire, Z

    K. Rivoire, Z. L. Lin, F. Hatami, W. T. Masselink, and J. Vuckovic. Second harmonic generation in gallium phosphide photonic crystal nanocavities with ultralow continuous wave pump power. Optics Express , 17(25):22609–22615, 2009. 10

    2009

  13. [20]

    D. P. Lake, M. Mitchell, H. Jayakumar, L. F. dos Santos, D. Curic, and P. E. Barclay. Efficient telecom to visible wavelength conversion in doubly resonant gallium phosphide microdisks. Applied Physics Letters , 108(3):031109, 2016

    2016

  14. [21]

    M. Bruel. Silicon-on-Insulator Material Technology. Electronics Letters, 31(14):1201–1202, 1995

    1995

  15. [22]

    Maleville, B

    C. Maleville, B. Aspar, T. Poumeyrol, H. Moriceau, M. Bruel, A. J. AubertonHerve, and T. Barge. Wafer bonding and H-implantation mechanisms involved in the Smart-cut ® technology. Materials Science and Engineering B-Solid State Materials for Advanced Tech- nology, 46(1-3):14–19, 1997

    1997

  16. [23]

    Moriceau, F

    H. Moriceau, F. Mazen, C. Braley, F. Rieutord, A. Tauzin, and C. Deguet. Smart Cut TM: Review on an attractive process for innovative substrate elaboration. Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section B-Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms , 277:84–92, 2012

    2012

  17. [24]

    Rabiei and P

    P. Rabiei and P. Gunter. Optical and electro-optical properties of submicrometer lithium niobate slab waveguides prepared by crystal ion slicing and wafer bonding. Applied Physics Letters, 85(20):4603–4605, 2004

    2004

  18. [25]

    Tauzin, J

    A. Tauzin, J. Dechamp, F. Madeira, F. Mazen, M. Zussy, C. Deguet, L. Clavelier, J. S. Moulet, C. Richtarch, T. Akatsu, M. Yoshimi, and A. Rigny. 3-inch single-crystal LiTaO3 films onto metallic electrode using Smart Cut TM technology. Electronics Letters, 44(13):822–824, 2008

    2008

  19. [26]

    W. L. Liu, D. Zhan, and X. B. Ma. Fabrication of single-crystalline LiTaO 3 film on silicon substrate using thin film transfer technology. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B , 26(1):206––208, 2008

    2008

  20. [27]

    DiCioccio, Y

    L. DiCioccio, Y. LeTiec, F. Letertre, C. Jaussaud, and M. Bruel. Silicon carbide on insulator formation using the Smart Cut process. Electronics Letters, 32(12):1144–1145, 1996

    1996

  21. [28]

    Huang, Q

    K. Huang, Q. Jia, T. G. You, R. C. Zhang, J. J. Lin, S. B. Zhang, M. Zhou, B. Zhang, W. J. Yu, X. Ou, and X. Wang. Investigation on thermodynamics of ion-slicing of GaN and het- erogeneously integrating high-quality GaN films on CMOS compatible Si(100) substrates. Scientific R...

    2017

  22. [29]

    Q. Y. Tong and U. M. Gösele. Wafer bonding and layer splitting for microsystems. Advanced Materials, 11(17):1409–1425, 1999

    1999

  23. [31]

    Anodic bonding

    KM Knowles and ATJ Van Helvoort. Anodic bonding. International materials reviews , 51(5):273–311, 2006

    2006

  24. [32]

    T. Suni, K. Henttinen, I. Suni, and J. Mäkinen. Effects of plasma activation on hydrophilic bonding of Si and SiO 2. Journal of the Electrochemical Society , 149(6):G348–G351, 2002

    2002

  25. [33]

    Schojberg-Henriksen, M

    K. Schojberg-Henriksen, M. M. V. Taklo, A. Hanneborg, and G. U. Jensen. Oxide charges induced by plasma activation for wafer bonding. Sensors and Actuators a-Physical , 102(1- 2):99–105, 2002. 11

    2002

  26. [34]

    J. F. Ziegler, M. D. Ziegler, and J. P. Biersack. SRIM - The stopping and range of ions in matter (2010). Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section B-Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms , 268(11-12):1818––1823, 2010

    2010

  27. [35]

    R. M. Roth, D. Djukic, Y. S. Lee, R. M. Osgood, S. Bakhru, B. Laulicht, K. Dunn, H. Bakhru, L. Q. Wu, and M. B. Huang. Compositional and structural changes in LiNbO3 following deep He+ ion implantation for film exfoliation. Applied Physics Let- ters, 89(11):112906, 2006

    2006

  28. [36]

    Aspar, H

    B. Aspar, H. Moriceau, E. Jalaguier, C. Lagahe, A. Soubie, B. Biasse, A. M. Papon, A. Claverie, J. Grisolia, G. Benassayag, F. Letertre, O. Rayssac, T. Barge, C. Maleville, and B. Ghyselen. The generic nature of the Smart-Cut (R) process for thin film transfer. Journal of Elec...

    2001

  29. [37]

    D. E. Aspnes and A. A. Studna. Dielectric Functions and Optical-Parameters of Si, Ge, Gap, Gaas, Gasb, Inp, Inas, and Insb from 1.5 to 6.0 eV. Physical Review B, 27(2):985–1009,

  30. [38]

    P. Yeh, A. Yariv, and C. S. Hong. Electromagnetic Propagation in Periodic Stratified Media .1. General Theory. Journal of the Optical Society of America , 67(4):423––438, 1977. Supporting Information Additional supporting information can be found in the Supporting Information ...

    1977

  31. [1983]

    Qa407 Times Cited:3691 Cited References Count:144

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.