Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Floquet Chern Vector Topological Insulators in Three Dimensions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes that phase-delayed temporal-periodic hopping in a three-dimensional modified stacked kagome lattice produces a Floquet Chern vector C=(1,1,-1), so the insulator should host unidirectional, backscattering-free surface…

desk verdict A promising Floquet Chern-vector model whose headline invariant is computed only in uncontrolled truncations; the direct surface-state simulation is real, but the bulk topology needs to be checked against the full Floquet spectrum. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00619 v2 pith:OCS7GHIV submitted 2024-11-30 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Fangyuan Ma , Junrong Feng , Feng Li , Ying Wu , Di Zhou This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ChernvectorFloquettopologicalinsulatortime-reversalsymmetrybreakingthree-dimensionaltight-bindingmodelstackedkagomelatticechiralsurfacestatestime-periodichoppinggaugefield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a three-dimensional tight-binding lattice with time-periodically modulated hopping, whose phases advance by a fixed angle bond by bond, can effectively produce a magnetic-flux-like gauge field with nonzero projections in all three spatial directions. In the Floquet description this yields three Chern numbers that together form the Chern vector C=(1,1,-1). If the argument is right, the system is a three-dimensional Chern vector topological insulator, distinct from a trivial stack of two-dimensional Chern insulators, with chiral surface states on every face rather than only on horizontal surfaces. The authors support this with Bloch-Floquet analysis, a high-frequency Floquet-Magnus effective Hamiltonian, and numerical wave-packet simulations of the original time-dependent model.

What carries the argument

The central object is the phase-delayed time-periodic hopping amplitude lambda_i(t) = $\lambda$^(0) + $\lambda$^(1) cos(omega_F t + phi_i) with phi_{i+1} = phi_i + 2pi/6, placed on six bonds of a modified stacked kagome lattice. The argument turns on the Floquet-Magnus commutator [H_k^(-1), H_k^(1)], which converts the time modulation into an effective time-reversal-breaking gauge field: it produces nearest-neighbor and next-nearest-neighbor complex hoppings with phase i|sin Delta_phi|, giving a flux of pi/2 per shaded plaquette with nonzero projections in all three spatial directions. This commutator is what turns periodic driving into a Chern vector, and the Chern numbers are then obtained by integrating the Berry curvature of the occupied bands over each two-dimensional surface Brillouin zone.

What would settle it

Compute the exact quasienergy spectrum of the full time-dependent Hamiltonian H(t) over one driving period in the same parameter regime and integrate the Berry curvature of the five bands below the target gap; if the resulting triplet is not (1,1,-1), or if the gap closes anywhere in the Brillouin zone, the effective-Hamiltonian prediction fails. A simpler check is to repeat the supercell surface-state calculation at omega_F = 2500, deep in the assumed high-frequency regime, and compare the Chern numbers and surface dispersions with those at omega_F = 250.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that phase-delayed periodic driving alone can break time-reversal symmetry in three dimensions and produce a gapped Floquet band structure whose topological invariants form a Chern vector C=(1,1,-1). The driving assigns each of six modulated bonds a phase phi_i = phi_1 + (i-1)Delta_phi with Delta_phi = 2pi/6, and the first-order Floquet-Magnus commutator [H_k^(-1), H_k^(1)] generates complex nearest-neighbor and next-nearest-neighbor hoppings with phase pi/2, equivalent to a gauge flux of pi/2 per shaded plaquette with nonzero projections along all three primitive directions. The authors compute Chern numbers by integrating Berry curvature over two-dimensional slices of the Brillouin zone and find the same Chern vector for both the first-order truncated Floquet Hamiltonian and the zeroth-order effective Hamiltonian, indicating stability of the topological indices. Supercell and finite-lattice simulations show in-gap chiral surface states whose group velocities match the sign of each Chern component, and these states propagate unidirectionally past three structural defects without backscattering.

Load-bearing premise

The argument relies on the first-order Floquet-Magnus effective Hamiltonian correctly reproducing the band topology of the actual time-dependent system, which requires the driving frequency to be much larger than all energy scales; in the numerics omega_F = 250 rad/s is only about twice $\lambda$^(1) = 120 rad/s, and the commutator in Eq. (13) omits diagonal on-site contributions, so if higher harmonics or the omitted terms close the band gap the Chern vector and surface-state predictions would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A purely time-modulated lattice, without static magnetic fields or mechanical rotation, can realize a three-dimensional Chern insulator.
  • Chiral surface transport exists on all faces of a finite sample, with propagation direction for each surface determined by the corresponding Chern vector component.
  • Surface states are expected to remain unidirectional when encountering structural defects, because the in-gap dispersion offers no opposite-velocity channel for backscattering.
  • The effective next-nearest-neighbor hopping generated by the Floquet mechanism is absent from the bare lattice, so time modulation expands the connectivity and topological possibilities of a given lattice geometry.
  • The matching Chern numbers from the first-order and zeroth-order truncated Floquet Hamiltonians indicate that the topological prediction is robust against moderate changes in the effective Hamiltonian.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Going beyond the paper, the same phase-delay prescription could be applied to other three-dimensional lattices whose bond loops have nonzero projections in all directions, potentially generating Chern vectors other than (1,1,-1) such as (2,1,-1).
  • The paper's numerical regime has omega_F = 250 rad/s compared to lambda^(1) = 120 rad/s, a ratio of about two rather than deep high frequency; a direct test at much larger omega_F would show whether the first-order Floquet-Magnus term captures the full time-dependent topology or whether higher harmonics matter.
  • The surface Fermi loops form torus knots whose winding numbers equal the Chern vector components, which suggests an experimental signature: measuring constant-frequency surface Fermi loops in a time-modulated photonic, mechanical, or electrical metamaterial would directly reveal the Chern vector.
  • Because the simulations use the original time-dependent Hamiltonian H(t) rather than only the effective Hamiltonian, the predicted surface-state robustness could persist even where the high-frequency expansion is only marginally valid, provided the bulk gap remains open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a three-dimensional tight-binding model on a modified stacked kagome lattice with phase-delayed time-periodic hopping amplitudes. The authors argue that this time modulation breaks time-reversal symmetry and induces an effective gauge field with nonzero flux projections in all three spatial directions, yielding a Floquet Chern vector C=(1,1,-1). The paper analyzes the model through a first-harmonic (9x9) truncation and a Floquet-Magnus (3x3) effective Hamiltonian, computes Chern numbers for each, and reports unidirectional chiral surface states on all open surfaces, including a direct time-domain simulation with defects. The central quantitative claim is that the time-periodic model hosts a Chern vector topological insulator with a nonzero invariant in every spatial direction.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the work offers a potentially significant route to three-dimensional Chern vector insulators in classical wave systems using time modulation instead of external magnetic fields or rotation. The direct numerical propagation in Fig. 4 provides concrete evidence of chiral surface dynamics and defect-immune transport, and the manuscript is clearly written with useful schematic figures. However, the paper's central invariant is not presently established for the actual time-periodic system: the analytic derivation contains a phase convention inconsistency and an incomplete Floquet-Magnus commutator, and the Chern numbers are computed only for approximate Hamiltonians under parameter conditions outside the stated high-frequency regime. These issues make the quantitative prediction C=(1,1,-1) unsupported as it stands.

major comments (3)
  1. [§II, §IV, Eq. (5) and Eq. (16)] The phase delay convention is internally inconsistent. Equation (5) defines Δϕ = 2π/N with N=6, giving Δϕ = π/3, but the text in Section IV and the subsequent discussion set Δϕ = π/6 and state that the effective hopping phase is π/2. Because Eq. (16) depends on |sin Δϕ|, these are distinct models with different effective hoppings, so the computed Chern vector C=(1,1,-1) is not uniquely assigned to the Hamiltonian in Eq. (3). The authors should adopt a single convention, state it unambiguously, and verify that the topology is unchanged if π/3 is intended.
  2. [§IV, Eq. (13) and Eq. (16)] The first-order Floquet-Magnus correction is written as (1/ω_F)[H^{(-1)}, H^{(1)}] in Eq. (13), but the standard expansion contains a prefactor 1/2, so there is a missing factor of 1/2 in the effective Hamiltonian. In addition, H^{(-1)} and H^{(1)} are off-diagonal 3x3 matrices, and their commutator generically has nonzero diagonal entries; Eq. (16) displays only the off-diagonal nearest-neighbor and next-nearest-neighbor parts and gives no argument that the diagonal (on-site) terms vanish for this model. Both omissions change the effective Hamiltonian quantitatively, and the paper does not show that the Chern numbers are unaffected by these corrections.
  3. [§V, Figs. 2(b)-(c) and Eq. (10)] The Chern vector C=(1,1,-1) is computed only for the 3x3 Floquet-Magnus Hamiltonian and the 9x9 first-harmonic truncation, never for the full Floquet Hamiltonian of Eq. (10). With the parameters in Section V, λ^(1)/ω_F = 120/250 = 0.48 and λ^(0)/ω_F = 0.16, which are not in the high-frequency regime ω_F >> λ used to justify the Floquet-Magnus expansion. The two approximate band structures in Figs. 2(b) and 2(c) visibly differ, and no convergence check with respect to the harmonic cutoff is reported. The direct time-domain simulation in Fig. 4 demonstrates chiral surface propagation but does not establish the bulk Chern invariant for the actual time-periodic Hamiltonian in Eq. (3).
minor comments (4)
  1. [§II] There is a typo in 'the Plank's constant is set to ℏ = 1' — it should be 'Planck's constant.'
  2. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption labels two panels as '(c)': one describing the Brillouin zone and one illustrating the closed loop with effective magnetic flux; the latter should be '(d)' and subsequent panel references adjusted.
  3. [Eq. (18)] The expression for the surface local density of states is ambiguous: the factor Γ should be placed clearly, e.g., as Γ/[π((ω-ω_i)^2 + Γ^2)], rather than having Γ appear in the numerator of a large fraction with unclear grouping.
  4. [Throughout] The manuscript uses 'time-reversal' and 'time-reversal symmetry' interchangeably; for precision, the symmetry should be referred to consistently as 'time-reversal symmetry' where a symmetry operation is meant.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Chern vector is computed from the derived Floquet Hamiltonians, not read off from the phase-delay construction, and the surface states are independently checked by direct time-domain simulation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: original time-periodic tight-binding Hamiltonian H(t) in Eq. (3) -> Fourier decomposition in Eq. (7) -> exact infinite Floquet Hamiltonian in Eq. (10) -> two approximations (9x9 first-harmonic truncation in Eq. (11) and 3x3 Floquet-Magnus effective Hamiltonian in Eq. (13)). The Chern vector C=(1,1,-1) is obtained by numerical integration of Berry curvature via Eq. (17) for these approximate Hamiltonians, and is not identical to the input phase pattern; no parameter is fitted to force this value. The topological surface-state chirality and defect bypass are then simulated from the original H(t) of Eq. (3) (Fig. 4), which is an independent check. The Floquet-Magnus expansion is cited to an external standard reference [41] (Eckardt and Anisimovas); the self-citations in the reference list ([53], [57], [62], [72]) support only background statements and are not load-bearing for the claimed invariant. Caveats such as the moderately large ratio lambda^(1)/omega_F = 0.48, the Delta-phi = pi/6 vs pi/3 convention inconsistency, and the lack of harmonic-cutoff convergence checks are correctness risks, not instances of the derivation reducing to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All quantitative parameters are hand-picked to produce a clear gap and visible edge states; the effective gauge field is emergent, not a separate entity. The heavy reliance on an approximate Floquet Hamiltonian, whose derivation is not fully shown, is the main hidden cost.

free parameters (6)
  • m = 100 rad/s
    On-site potential chosen to create a wide band gap.
  • λ_z = 4 rad/s
    Static interlayer hopping, small to keep quasi-2D structure.
  • ω_F = 250 rad/s
    Driving frequency; ratio λ^(1)/ω_F ≈ 0.48 is not deeply in the high-frequency regime.
  • λ^(0) = 40 rad/s
    Static hopping amplitude in the modulated bonds.
  • λ^(1) = 120 rad/s
    Modulation amplitude set to 3λ^(0) to open a clear gap.
  • Δϕ = π/3 (Eq. 5) but stated as π/6 (Sec. V)
    Phase delay step; inconsistent between the defining equation and the text.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math The time-dependent tight-binding Hamiltonian in Eq. (3) describes the lattice dynamics.
    Non-interacting Schrödinger equation on a lattice; standard for classical and quantum wave systems.
  • ad hoc to paper The Floquet-Magnus expansion to first order in 1/ω_F (Eq. 13) is sufficient.
    Assumed high-frequency limit; no convergence check for the chosen parameters.
  • ad hoc to paper The commutator [H^(−1), H^(1)] in Eq. (16) is computed correctly and completely.
    Diagonal terms are omitted and the algebra is not shown.
  • domain assumption Chern numbers of the effective Hamiltonian determine the system's topology.
    Standard for static effective Hamiltonians; in Floquet systems the full quasi-energy spectrum must be gapped and micro-motion contributions negligible.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Floquet Chern Vector Topological Insulators in Three Dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OCS7GHIV

@misc{pith2026241200619,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Floquet Chern Vector Topological Insulators in Three Dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OCS7GHIV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00619}
}
read the original abstract

We theoretically and numerically investigate Chern vector insulators and topological surface states in a three-dimensional lattice, based on phase-delayed temporal-periodic interactions within the tight-binding model. These Floquet interactions break time-reversal symmetry, effectively inducing a gauge field analogous to magnetic flux. This gauge field results in Chern numbers in all spatial dimensions, collectively forming the Chern vector. This vector characterizes the topological phases and signifies the emergence of robust surface states. Numerically, we observe these states propagating unidirectionally without backscattering on all open surfaces of the three-dimensional system. Our work paves the way for breaking time-reversal symmetry and realizing three-dimensional Chern vector topological insulators using temporal-periodic Floquet techniques.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.00619 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of the tight binding model that is embedded in the three-dimensional modified stacked kagome [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The band structure of the tight binding model is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Surface states dispersions of Floquet insulator with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Numerically simulated propagation of a Floquet sur [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Chern Vector Protected Three-dimensional Quantized Hall Effect

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a 3D system with Chern vector (0,m,n), the protected combination of two-terminal transmissions equals (mLy+nLz)e^2/h, yielding Hall conductances Gxy=-Gyx=(mLy+nLz)e^2/h with a double sample-size dependence.

  2. Tunable phase transitions from semimetals to Chern insulators in two-dimensional quadratic-band-crossing materials

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For quadratic-band-crossing semimetals, a static sigma-2 mass gives Chern number +-sgn(tx tz), while elliptically polarized light gives Chern number +-sgn(phi); the claimed linear-polarization trivial insulator is act...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    L. Fu, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803 (2007)

    2007

  2. [2]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  3. [3]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    C. W. Duncan, S. Manna, and A. E. B. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. B 101, 115413 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    X. Wen, M. Qi, A. Beaudry, J. Moreno, M. J. Pflaum, D. Spiegel, A. Vishwanath, and M. Hermele, Phys. Rev. B 108, 125147 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  7. [7]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  8. [8]

    Regnault and B

    N. Regnault and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. X 1, 021014 (2011)

    2011

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Ovchinnikov, J

    D. Ovchinnikov, J. Cai, Z. Lin, Z. Fei, Z. Liu, Y.-T. Cui, D. H. Cobden, J.-H. Chu, C.-Z. Chang, D. Xiao, et al., Nature communications 13, 5967 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988)

    1988

  3. [11]

    Coh and D

    S. Coh and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 107603 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    Z. Liu, E. J. Bergholtz, H. Fan, and A. M. L¨ auchli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 186805 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    Devescovi, M

    C. Devescovi, M. Garc ´ ıa-D ´ ıez, I. Robredo, M. Blanco de Paz, J. Lasa-Alonso, B. Bradlyn, J. L. Ma˜ nes, M. G. Vergniory, and A. Garc ´ ıa-Etxarri, Nature com- munications 12, 7330 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    P. Lai, H. Liu, B. Xie, W. Deng, H. Wang, H. Cheng, Z. Liu, and S. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 109, L140104 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    S¨ usstrunk and S

    R. S¨ usstrunk and S. D. Huber, Science349, 47 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    L. M. Nash, D. Kleckner, A. Read, V. Vitelli, A. M. Turner, and W. T. Irvine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 14495 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    M. I. N. Rosa, R. K. Pal, J. R. F. Arruda, and M. Ruzzene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 034301 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    A. B. Khanikaev, R. Fleury, S. H. Mousavi, and A. Alu, Nature communications 6, 8260 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Souslov, K

    A. Souslov, K. Dasbiswas, M. Fruchart, S. Vaikun- tanathan, and V. Vitelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 128001 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Souslov, B

    A. Souslov, B. C. Van Zuiden, D. Bartolo, and V. Vitelli, Nature Physics 13, 1091 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Dasbiswas, K

    K. Dasbiswas, K. K. Mandadapu, and S. Vaikun- tanathan, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences 115, E9031 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Fu and H

    Y. Fu and H. Qin, Nature Communications 12, 3924 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Fu and H

    Y. Fu and H. Qin, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023273 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Z. Wang, Y. Biao, X.-T. Zeng, X. Chen, X.-L. Sheng, S. A. Yang, and R. Yu, Phys. Rev. B 107, L201101 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    K. Sone, M. Ezawa, Y. Ashida, N. Yoshioka, and T. Sagawa, Nature Physics , 1 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Linyun, X

    Y. Linyun, X. Xiang, M. Yan, Z. Zhenxiao, W. Ying, C. Jingming, C. Minqi, X. Kexin, S. P. Ping, Y. Yihao, et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.07040 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    G.-G. Liu, Z. Gao, Q. Wang, X. Xi, Y.-H. Hu, M. Wang, C. Liu, X. Lin, L. Deng, S. A. Yang, et al., Nature 609, 925 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Y. Hu, M. Tong, T. Jiang, J.-H. Jiang, H. Chen, and Y. Yang, Nature Communications 15, 10036 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Y. Liu, Y. Xu, S.-C. Zhang, and W. Duan, Phys. Rev. B 96, 064106 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Z.-R. Liu, R. Chen, and B. Zhou, Phys. Rev. B 109, 125303 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Kawai, K

    R. Kawai, K. Lindenberg, and C. Van den Broeck, Phys- ica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications312, 119 (2002). 10

    2002

  24. [32]

    Z.-R. Liu, R. Chen, and B. Zhou, Chinese Physics Let- ters 41, 047102 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    R. Fan, Y. Gu, A. Vishwanath, and X. Wen, SciPost Physics 10, 049 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Fleury, A

    R. Fleury, A. B. Khanikaev, and A. Alu, Nature com- munications 7, 11744 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    Peng and G

    Y. Peng and G. Refael, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 016806 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    G´ omez-Le´ on and G

    A. G´ omez-Le´ on and G. Platero, Physical review letters 110, 200403 (2013)

    2013

  29. [37]

    Han and X

    B. Han and X. Wen, Physical Review B 102, 205125 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Wen and J.-Q

    X. Wen and J.-Q. Wu, arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.00031 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Melkani and J

    A. Melkani and J. Paulose, Phys. Rev. E 110, 015003 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Baardink, A

    G. Baardink, A. Souslov, J. Paulose, and V. Vitelli, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 489 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Eckardt and E

    A. Eckardt and E. Anisimovas, New journal of physics 17, 093039 (2015)

    2015

  34. [42]

    Parker, A

    R. Parker, A. Aceves, J. Cuevas-Maraver, and P. G. Kevrekidis, Physical Review E 108, 024214 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Melkani and J

    A. Melkani and J. Paulose, Physical Review E 110, 015003 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Chaunsali and G

    R. Chaunsali and G. Theocharis, Phys. Rev. B 100, 014302 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979)

    1979

  38. [46]

    Y. Wang, C. Cui, R.-W. Zhang, X. Wang, Z.-M. Yu, G.- B. Liu, and Y. Yao, Phys. Rev. B 109, 195101 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, science 314, 1757 (2006)

    2006

  40. [48]

    Zangeneh-Nejad and R

    F. Zangeneh-Nejad and R. Fleury, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 053902 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    C. W. Duncan, S. Manna, and A. E. Nielsen, Physical Review B 101, 115413 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Kane and T

    C. Kane and T. Lubensky, Nature Physics 10, 39 (2014)

    2014

  43. [51]

    D. Zhou, L. Zhang, and X. Mao, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021054 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    Fruchart, Y

    M. Fruchart, Y. Zhou, and V. Vitelli, Nature 577, 636 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    Z. Tang, F. Ma, F. Li, Y. Yao, and D. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 106101 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    Tuloup, R

    T. Tuloup, R. W. Bomantara, and J. Gong, New Journal of Physics 25, 083048 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    G. Lee, D. Lee, J. Park, Y. Jang, M. Kim, and J. Rho, Communications Physics 5, 94 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    S. Liu, S. Ma, Q. Zhang, L. Zhang, C. Yang, O. You, W. Gao, Y. Xiang, T. J. Cui, and S. Zhang, Light: Sci- ence & Applications 9, 1 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    D. Zhou, D. Zeb Rocklin, M. Leamy, and Y. Yao, Nature Communications 13, 3379 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    J. R. Tempelman, K. H. Matlack, and A. F. Vakakis, Physical Review B 104, 174306 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    D. C. Vural and A. J. Leggett, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 357, 3528 (2011)

    2011

  52. [60]

    Vanderbilt, Berry phases in electronic structure theory: electric polarization, orbital magnetization and topological insulators (Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    D. Vanderbilt, Berry phases in electronic structure theory: electric polarization, orbital magnetization and topological insulators (Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Q.-L. Lei, F. Tang, J.-D. Hu, Y.-q. Ma, and R. Ni, Phys- ical Review Letters 129, 125501 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    F. Ma, Z. Tang, X. Shi, Y. Wu, J. Yang, D. Zhou, Y. Yao, and F. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 046101 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    Y. Chen, Q. Zhang, Y. Zhang, B. Xia, X. Liu, X. Zhou, C. Chen, and G. Hu, Advances in Mechanics 51, 1 (2021)

    2021

  56. [64]

    Yang and Y.-Z

    Z.-J. Yang and Y.-Z. Wang, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 479, 20220713 (2023)

    2023

  57. [65]

    Martello, Y

    E. Martello, Y. Singhal, B. Gadway, T. Ozawa, and H. M. Price, Physical Review E 107, 064211 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    Chen, Z.-G

    Y.-F. Chen, Z.-G. Chen, H. Ge, C. He, X. Li, M.-H. Lu, X.-C. Sun, S.-Y. Yu, and X. Zhang, Interdisciplinary Materials 2, 179 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    M. I. Rosa, B. L. Davis, L. Liu, M. Ruzzene, and M. I. Hussein, Physical Review Materials 7, 124201 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    W. Hu, B. Ruan, W. Lin, C. Liu, X. Dai, S. Wen, and Y. Xiang, Communications Physics 7, 204 (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    Zhang, Y

    Q. Zhang, Y. Li, H. Sun, X. Liu, L. Zhao, X. Feng, X. Fan, and C. Qiu, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 017201 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    X. Wen, C. Qiu, Y. Qi, L. Ye, M. Ke, F. Zhang, and Z. Liu, Nature Physics 15, 352 (2019)

    2019

  63. [71]

    Y. Long, D. Zhang, C. Yang, J. Ge, H. Chen, and J. Ren, Nature communications 11, 4716 (2020)

    2020

  64. [72]

    D. Zhou, L. Zhang, and X. Mao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 068003 (2018)

    2018

  65. [73]

    Bosnar, A

    M. Bosnar, A. Y. Vyazovskaya, E. K. Petrov, E. V. Chulkov, and M. M. Otrokov, npj 2D Materials and Applications 7, 33 (2023)

    2023

  66. [74]

    Cheng, F

    N. Cheng, F. Serafin, J. McInerney, Z. Rocklin, K. Sun, and X. Mao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 088002 (2022)

    2022

  67. [75]

    Liu, C.-B

    Z.-R. Liu, C.-B. Hua, T. Peng, and B. Zhou, Phys. Rev. B 105, 245301 (2022)

    2022

  68. [76]

    A.-L. He, L. Qi, Y. Liu, and Y.-F. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 110, 195113 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.