Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Interaction Configurations and Prompt Guidance in Conversational AI for Question Answering in Human-AI Teams

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.01648 v2 pith:ODKBW32N submitted 2025-05-03 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords humanhuman-aiconfigurationsconversationalguidancepromptansweringcompared
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Understanding the dynamics of human-AI interaction in question answering is crucial for enhancing collaborative efficiency. Extending from our initial formative study, which revealed challenges in human utilization of conversational AI support, we designed two configurations for prompt guidance: a Nudging approach, where the AI suggests potential responses for human agents, and a Highlight strategy, emphasizing crucial parts of reference documents to aid human responses. Through two controlled experiments, the first involving 31 participants and the second involving 106 participants, we compared these configurations against traditional human-only approaches, both with and without AI assistance. Our findings suggest that effective human-AI collaboration can enhance response quality, though merely combining human and AI efforts does not ensure improved outcomes. In particular, the Nudging configuration was shown to help improve the quality of the output when compared to AI alone. This paper delves into the development of these prompt guidance paradigms, offering insights for refining human-AI collaborations in conversational question-answering contexts and contributing to a broader understanding of human perceptions and expectations in AI partnerships.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Between Knowledge and Care: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Generative AI for T2DM Self-Management from Patient and Physician Perspectives

    cs.HC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Generative AI aids T2DM self-management on facts and lifestyle but fails on meds and emotion; patients and physicians converge on role limits, emotional gaps, and personalization needs, informing four design directions.

Pith tools