Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Static versus Dynamic Arbitrage Bounds on Multivariate Option Prices

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cs/0407029 v1 pith:ODM3FKW2 submitted 2004-07-10 cs.CE

Static versus Dynamic Arbitrage Bounds on Multivariate Option Prices

classification cs.CE
keywords pricesarbitragemodelstaticboundsblack-scholescallslarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We compare static arbitrage price bounds on basket calls, i.e. bounds that only involve buy-and-hold trading strategies, with the price range obtained within a multi-variate generalization of the Black-Scholes model. While there is no gap between these two sets of prices in the univariate case, we observe here that contrary to our intuition about model risk for at-the-money calls, there is a somewhat large gap between model prices and static arbitrage prices, hence a similarly large set of prices on which a multivariate Black-Scholes model cannot be calibrated but where no conclusion can be drawn on the presence or not of a static arbitrage opportunity.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.