Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

The paper proves that every non-global axisymmetric no-swirl solution is pinned to exactly one interior blow-up point, and that the blow-up point uniquely selects the solution.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A survey of (-1)-homogeneous stationary Navier-Stokes solutions with singular rays, plus new trichotomy and blow-up-point results for axisymmetric no-swirl solutions, illustrated with graphs.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-04 challenge →

load-bearing objection A genuinely new local trichotomy in a mostly expository paper, undercut by an unqualified endpoint-uniqueness claim that fails in degenerate cases and by citations to an unpublished manuscript. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.07243 v1 pith:OEHMFRHM submitted 2025-09-08 math.AP

Recent research on (-1)-homogeneous solutions of stationary Navier-Stokes equations

Li Li , Xukai Yan This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 35Q3035B4076D05
keywords (-1)-homogeneous solutionsstationary Navier-Stokes equationssingular raysaxisymmetric no-swirlLandau solutionsblow-uphypergeometric functionsRiccati equation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is an exposition of what is known about (-1)-homogeneous solutions of the three-dimensional stationary Navier-Stokes equations, i.e. solutions invariant under the natural scaling, allowing singular rays away from the origin. Its new contribution is a structural theorem for the axisymmetric, no-swirl case: after reducing the equations to a single first-order ODE for U_theta(y), y = cos theta, every solution with parameter c in the admissible set J_nu either belongs to the previously classified global family, or is anchored at one pole with a prescribed boundary value and blows up to plus or minus infinity at exactly one interior point. The paper further proves that each interior blow-up point determines a unique such solution, giving a one-to-one correspondence between blow-up positions and non-global local solutions. If correct, this completely describes the local structure of every axisymmetric no-swirl (-1)-homogeneous Navier-Stokes solution with singular rays.

Core claim

The central claim is Proposition 3.1 in Section 3.1. For each admissible parameter c in J_nu, any solution U_theta of the reduced Riccati-type equation (10) whose maximal domain in (-1,1) is (y0,y1) falls into exactly one of three classes: (a) y0 = -1, y1 = 1, and U_theta is one of the global solutions U^{c,gamma}_theta from the earlier four-parameter classification; (b) y0 = -1 < y1 < 1, with U_theta below the lower solution U^-_theta, boundary value tau1 at y = -1, and divergence to -infinity as y -> y1-; (c) -1 < y0 < y1 = 1, with U_theta above the upper solution U^+_theta, boundary value tau2' at y = 1, and divergence to +infinity as y -> y0+. Proposition 3.2 then asserts that every inte

What carries the argument

The central object is the reduced ODE (10) for U_theta(y) = u_theta sin theta, a Riccati-type equation obtained by rewriting the axisymmetric no-swirl condition on the unit sphere. Solutions are encoded by U_theta = 2 nu (1-y^2) w'/w, where w solves the linear second-order equation (23); when c1, c2 >= -nu^2 this becomes a hypergeometric equation. The proof hinges on the upper and lower envelope solutions U^pm_theta from the earlier classification, the pole boundary values tau1, tau2, tau1', tau2' defined in (14), and uniqueness of the initial-value problem. Two solutions of the Riccati equation cannot cross, so a non-global solution is confined either below U^-_theta or above U^+_theta; the

Load-bearing premise

The trichotomy depends on Lemma 3.2(a): any solution of (10) that reaches the pole y = -1 or y = 1 must have a finite limit equal to one of the two constants tau1, tau2 (or tau1', tau2'), a fact the paper imports from Theorem 1.3 of the earlier paper [25] rather than proving here; if some admissible parameter allowed an infinite, oscillating, or absent pole limit, the classification would miss cases.

What would settle it

Compute a solution of (10) with c in J_nu whose maximal domain is (-1,y1) with y1 < 1 but whose limit at y = -1 equals tau2 instead of tau1: since the unique solution with U(-1) = tau2 is the upper envelope U^+_theta, which is global, such a solution would violate the trichotomy. Alternatively, for a fixed interior point y0, try to construct two distinct solutions on (y0,y0+delta) both blowing up to +infinity; Proposition 3.2(i) says exactly one exists, so a second example would refute it.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Every (-1)-homogeneous axisymmetric no-swirl solution with parameter c in J_nu that is not global is completely described by its single interior blow-up point; there are no other local solution shapes.
  • For fixed c, the non-global local solutions of (10) are parameterized by two copies of the open interval (-1,1): one family anchored at y = -1 and one anchored at y = 1, depending on which pole boundary value the solution takes.
  • The trichotomy recovers the previously known three types of singular behavior (smooth Landau-type, logarithmic Type 2, and Type 3 with |u| ~ 1/|x'|) as properties of global solutions, while all non-global local solutions exhibit a finite-angle blow-up to +infinity or -infinity.
  • Any local axisymmetric no-swirl solution that extends to a pole must be one of the classified global solutions, and any solution that does not extend has a well-defined interior blow-up angle; this sharpens the possible singular-ray asymptotics of the full Navier-Stokes system.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The uniqueness of the blow-up point suggests a natural coding map from non-global local solutions with admissible c to the circle: associate to each solution the angle theta0 where it blows up. This map could be a useful building block for classifying solutions with several singular rays, since each ray might carry one such local profile.
  • The trichotomy likely extends to axisymmetric solutions with nonzero swirl once the asymptotic expansions cited from the ongoing project [29] are completed, because the swirl equation in (7) decouples from the U_theta equation; the blow-up structure of U_theta should then survive with a swirl component superimposed.
  • The hypergeometric representation (30)-(31) gives a concrete way to compute the blow-up point from the initial datum gamma, and to test the uniqueness statement numerically on examples like those in Section 3.2; one could check that different fundamental-solution branch choices lead to the same U_theta.
  • The admissible set J_nu is exactly the regime where the pole-anchored trichotomy holds: in the paper's Case 6 (c outside J_nu), interior-to-interior blow-up solutions of type (a3) appear, so the trichotomy would break if finite pole limits ceased to exist for some admissible parameter.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper is an expository survey of recent work on (-1)-homogeneous solutions of the stationary Navier-Stokes equations with singular rays, concentrating on axisymmetric no-swirl solutions. It recalls the classification of global solutions on S^2 minus poles from the authors' earlier papers [25]-[27], the asymptotic expansions and removable singularity results [30], the vanishing-viscosity analysis [28], and the asymptotic stability results [31]. Section 3 contains the new contribution: a study of local solutions of the reduced ODE (10). The authors prove a trichotomy for solutions with maximal domain (Proposition 3.1), a one-to-one correspondence between interior blow-up points and non-global local solutions (Proposition 3.2), and a reduction to the hypergeometric equation (Lemma 3.3), followed by extensive graphical examples in six parameter regimes.

Significance. If correct, the Section 3 results give a fairly complete local description of axisymmetric no-swirl (-1)-homogeneous solutions: every non-global solution is either anchored at a pole with a finite boundary value and blows up at an interior point, or is one of the previously classified global solutions. The hypergeometric representation is explicit and checkable, and the figures usefully illustrate the different asymptotic types. The survey component is also valuable as an organized entry point to a substantial recent literature. However, the new material is a modest increment over [26], and the paper is heavily self-referential. More importantly, one key uniqueness statement reproduced in Proposition 2.1 is false in a degenerate parameter range, and that statement is used in the proof of the central trichotomy. The trichotomy is likely salvageable, but the manuscript as written needs a substantive correction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.1.1, Proposition 2.1(ii), equations (14)-(15)] The stated uniqueness is false when tau1=tau2. For c1=-nu^2 (Cases 2 and 4 in Section 3.2), (14) gives tau1=tau2=2nu. By (15), U^-_theta(-1)=tau1=tau2 and U^+_theta(-1)=tau2; Proposition 2.1(i) gives U^-_theta<U^+_theta on (-1,1) whenever c3>cbar(c1,c2). Thus two distinct global solutions share the boundary value U(-1)=tau2, contradicting the assertion that U^+ is the unique solution satisfying U(-1)=tau2. The analogous failure occurs at y=1 when c2=-nu^2, where U^+(1)=tau1'=tau2'=-2nu and U^-(1)=tau1'. The uniqueness assertions must be qualified to hold only when tau1≠tau2 (respectively tau1'≠tau2'). This is not a cosmetic issue: the proof of Proposition 3.1 uses this uniqueness in the line 'Since y1<1, U≠U^+ and thus U(-1)=tau1'. In the degenerate case tau1=tau2 the conclusion is automatic, but the argument as printed is invalid; a correct proof can use a crossing argument with U^- whe
  2. [Section 3.1, Lemma 3.2(a)] The finite-limit assertion is load-bearing but not proved in the paper; it is imported via the sentence 'By Theorem 1.3 in [25]'. Proposition 3.1 depends critically on the claim that a solution reaching y=-1 must have a finite limit equal to tau1 or tau2. If that input failed (infinite, oscillatory, or absent limit), alternatives (b) and (c) would not exhaust all cases. Since [25] is a published paper, citation is acceptable in principle, but the manuscript should state clearly that Lemma 3.2(a) is a restatement of a theorem from [25] and specify the exact hypotheses, or provide a proof/outline. The current one-line reference is too terse for a result on which the main new proposition rests.
  3. [Section 2.2.1] The text states that in the ongoing project [29] the authors 'have established the full asymptotic expansion' and 'completely classified' all local no-swirl solutions, and it then uses these assertions as settled facts in the survey. Because [29] is unpublished and not available for verification, these claims should be labelled as announced work-in-progress results or replaced by a statement of what is proved in the published papers [25,26,30]. This does not affect Section 3, but it affects the reliability of the survey portion.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1, Proposition 3.2] The wording 'such that lim_{y->y0+} U_theta does not exist' is confusing: the proof shows that every such solution actually has limit +infty (by Lemma 3.2(b)). The intended meaning is 'does not have a finite limit' or 'blows up'; please rephrase. Also, in the uniqueness proof, the sentence 'there is an lower solution' in Section 3.2 should read 'a lower solution'.
  2. [Section 3.2, after Case 6] Typo: 'Solutons exist on on' should be 'Solutions exist on'. There are also minor grammatical issues such as 'There is an lower solution'. These do not affect the mathematics.
  3. [Section 2.1.1, paragraph after Theorem 2.2] The statement 'There is a 1-1 correspondence between u^{c,gamma} and points in the four dimensional surface I_nu' is only true on the generic part of I_nu; when c3=cbar the interval [gamma-,gamma+] collapses to a point, so the parameter set has lower dimension. This is a minor imprecision in description.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the new Section 3 trichotomy is derived from the stated ODE with no fitted constants; self-citations are to peer-reviewed theorems that do not assume the conclusion, and the one unpublished self-citation is not load-bearing for the new result.

full rationale

Section 3 is not circular. It starts from the reduced ODE (10) and proves Lemma 3.1, Lemma 3.3 and Corollary 3.1 in-paper. Lemma 3.2(a) imports the finite endpoint-limit fact from Theorem 1.3 of [25] ('By Theorem 1.3 in [25], if y0 = -1, then U_theta(-1) = lim_{y->-1+} U_theta exists and is finite'), a peer-reviewed theorem that does not assume the trichotomy being proved. Proposition 3.1 combines that with the prior classification Theorem 2.2 and Proposition 2.1 from [26] to obtain new alternatives (b) and (c) via standard IVP and crossing arguments; no parameter is fitted and no conclusion is encoded in the ODE. Proposition 3.2 is proved by constructing w from (23) and showing that w'/w is independent of the normalization constant, so the one-to-one correspondence between blow-up points and local solutions is not an input. The only self-citation that goes beyond published work is to the in-preparation manuscript [29] for asymptotic expansions and force formulas; the paper itself marks it as an 'ongoing project' and it is not used in the Section 3 derivation. The reviewer's objection to Proposition 2.1(ii) uniqueness when tau1 = tau2 concerns correctness or completeness of a cited lemma, not circularity: a false or incomplete uniqueness claim would be a gap in the proof of Proposition 3.1, but it does not make the trichotomy definitionally identical to its assumptions. Overall, the paper's central new claims are self-contained in the sense that the ODE analysis is carried out from stated equations with no fitted constants and no conclusions assumed, so any circularity is at most a minor transparency concern from self-citation to unpublished work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The new results rest on standard ODE theory, classical hypergeometric function theory, the Liouville formula for the conformal metric equation, and the prior classification theorems summarized in Section 2, most of which are the authors' own published work. No number in the paper is fitted to data: the constants a, b, A, B, C, lambda, tau1, tau2, tau1', tau2' are explicit functions of the solution parameters (c, gamma, nu), and the examples merely evaluate them at representative values. The only unverifiable input is the unpublished manuscript [29].

axioms (7)
  • standard math Standard ODE theory: local existence, uniqueness and continuous dependence for the initial value problem (24), and uniqueness/comparison on maximal intervals
    Invoked throughout Section 3.1 (Lemmas 3.1, 3.2, Propositions 3.1, 3.2), where statements like 'by standard ODE theory' carry the argument.
  • standard math Fundamental solution theory for second-order linear ODEs and the hypergeometric equation, including the power series 2F1
    Used in Lemma 3.3 and Corollary 3.1 to convert (10) to (31) and to write the explicit solutions used for the figures.
  • domain assumption Correctness of the surveyed classification theorems: Theorem 2.1 ([25]), Theorem 2.2 and Proposition 2.1 ([26]), Theorem 2.3 ([25]), Theorems 2.4-2.5 ([30]), Theorem 2.6 ([28]), Theorem 2.7 ([31])
    The expository sections restate these published results without proof; Proposition 3.1 depends structurally on Theorem 2.2 and Proposition 2.1 for the existence of global solutions and their boundary values.
  • domain assumption Finite boundary limits at the poles for solutions of (10): U_theta(-1) in {tau1, tau2} and U_theta(1) in {tau1', tau2'} whenever the domain reaches the endpoint
    Lemma 3.2(a) cites Theorem 1.3 of [25] for this fact. It is the load-bearing premise that forces the pole-anchored alternatives (b) and (c) in Proposition 3.1.
  • ad hoc to paper The full asymptotic expansion and complete local classification of no-swirl solutions asserted in Section 2.2.1, credited to the in-preparation manuscript [29]
    No proof or public preprint is cited; the claims are assumed from unpublished work and cannot be checked from this paper.
  • domain assumption Constraint c1, c2 >= -nu^2 for the hypergeometric representation
    Lemma 3.3 requires sqrt(c1+nu^2) and sqrt(c2+nu^2) to be real for the constants a and b; the general linear representation of Lemma 3.1 does not need it.
  • standard math Liouville formula (17) for all solutions of -Delta phi + 2 = 2 e^phi on S^2
    Used in Section 2.1.3 to construct non-axisymmetric (-1)-homogeneous solutions from meromorphic functions f; cited to [8, 34].

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Recent research on $(-1)$-homogeneous solutions of stationary Navier-Stokes equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OEHMFRHM

@misc{pith2026250907243,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Recent research on $(-1)$-homogeneous solutions of stationary Navier-Stokes equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OEHMFRHM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07243}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We make an exposition of recent research on $(-1)$-homogeneous solutions of the three-dimensional incompressible stationary Navier-Stokes equations with singular rays. We also discuss properties of such solutions that are axisymmetric with no swirl, and present graphs illustrating examples that exhibit various typical types of singular behavior.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07243 by Li Li, Xukai Yan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Parameter set Iν ⊂ R 2 of (τ, σ). b. Classification of axisymmetric no-swirl solutions in S 2 \ {S, N} The classification of (−1)-homogeneous axisymmetric no-swirl solutions of (1) in C 2 (S 2 \ {S, N}) was established in [26]. Using the change of variables (6), for ν > 0, equation (4) for no-swirl solutions is converted to ν(1 − y 2 )U ′ θ + 2νyUθ + 1 2 U 2 θ = Pc(y) := c1(1 − y) + c2(1 + y) + c3(1 − y 2 … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The graphs of Uθ(y) in Example 3.1 (c1 = c2 = 0, c3 = 0.5, Case 1). Case 2. c1 = −ν 2 , c2 > −ν 2 , c3 > c¯3. In this case, we have U c,γ(−1) = U ± θ (−1) = 2ν, Uc,γ(1) = U + θ (1) > U − θ (1), γ− < γ < γ+. (38) All local solutions are satisfy either (a1) or (a2), and all global solutions are of Type 3. Example 3.2. ν = 1, c1 = −1, c2 = 8, c3 = −1.5 > c¯3. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The graphs and streamline of u c,γ in Example 3.1 (c1 = c2 = 0, c3 = 0.5, Case 1). 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) The graphs of Uθ(y) in Example 3.2; (b) The graphs of Uθ(y) Example 3.3 Example 3.4. ν = 1, c1 = c2 = −1, c3 = 0.5 > c¯3. We present in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The graphs of Uθ(y) in Example 3.4 (c1 = −1, c2 = −1, c3 = 0.5, Case 4) Case 5. c3 = ¯c3(c1, c2, ν). In this case, there is a unique global solution U + θ (c) ≡ U − ν,θ(c) ≡ U ∗ θ (c1, c2) := (ν + p ν 2 + c1)(1−y) + (−ν − p ν 2 + c2)(1 +y). (40) This solution is of Type 3, satisfying U ∗ θ (−1) = τ2 = 2ν + 2√ ν 2 + c1 and U ∗ θ (1) = τ ′ 1 = −2ν − 2 √ ν 2 + c2. All other solutions Uθ in this case are local… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The graphs of Uθ(y) in Example 3.5 (c3 = ¯c3, Case 5) U + θ (−1) = τ2. Any other (a1) solution satisfies Uθ < U + θ in the intersection of their respective domains, and Uθ(−1) = τ1. (a2) Solutions exist on on (y0, 1) for some −1 < y0 < 1 and lim y→y + 0 Uθ = +∞. Among these solutions, there is an lower solution U − θ , which has the largest domain and satisfies U − θ (1) = τ ′ 1 . Any other (a2) solution s… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The graphs of Uθ(y) in Example 3.6 (c3 < c¯3, no global solution, Case 6) Example 3.7. Let c1 = 25 9 , c2 = 1 9 , c3 = −2. Then (10) reads as ν(1 − y 2 )U ′ ν,θ + 2νyUν,θ + 1 2 U 2 ν,θ = Pc(y) = 2(y − 2 3 ) 2 . As ν → 0, the above equation tends to the Euler’s equation for (−1)-homogeneous axisymmetric solutions 1 2 V 2 θ = 2(y − 2 3 ) 2 , where Vθ = sin θvθ. There are two solutions V 1 θ = 2(y− 2 3 ) and … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The graphs of Uν,θ(y) and V ± θ in Example 3.7 In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The streamlines of uν for (a) ν = 1, (b) ν = 1/8, (c) ν = 1/20, (d) ν = 1/50. (a) -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 x1 x3 θ0 = cos-1 2 3 θ1 = π 2 (b) -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 x1 x3 θ0 = cos-1 2 3 θ1 = π 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) The streamlines of v +; (b) The streamlines of v −. References [1] K. Abe. Existence of homogeneous Euler flows of degree −α /∈ [−2, 0]. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 248(1):30, 2024. [2] J. Bao and Z. Chen. On the anisotropic Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg type inequal￾ities: Existence, symmetry breaking region and symmetry of extremal functions. Commun. Contemp. Math., page 2550016, 2025. [3] Z. Bradshaw an… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Singular stationary Navier-Stokes flows: examples and stability

    math.AP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Analyzes singular stationary Navier-Stokes solutions with boundaries, identifies new classes, and proves asymptotic stability for many including Type III solutions like Serrin's vortex via eventual regularity under ax...

  2. Minus one Homogeneous Euler Flows are Geodesible

    math.AP 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    In n≥4, (-1)-homogeneous Euler flows are geodesible with constant Bernoulli function and induced by geodesible fields on S^{n-1}; in n=4 they extend Beltrami fields on S^3.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    K. Abe. Existence of homogeneous Euler flows of degree−α /∈[−2,0].Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 248(1):30, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Bao and Z

    J. Bao and Z. Chen. On the anisotropic Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg type inequal- ities: Existence, symmetry breaking region and symmetry of extremal functions. Commun. Contemp. Math., page 2550016, 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Bradshaw and W

    Z. Bradshaw and W. Wang. Asymptotic stability for the 3D Navier-Stokes equa- tions inl 3 and nearby spaces.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 2025

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    M. Cannone. Harmonic analysis tools for solving the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. InHandbook of Mathematical Fluid Dynamics, volume III, pages 16–

    work page

  5. [5]

    Cannone and G

    M. Cannone and G. Karch. Smooth or singular solutions to the Navier-Stokes system?J. Differential Equations, 197(2):247–274, 2004

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    Cannone, G

    M. Cannone, G. Karch, D. Pilarczyk, and G. Wu. Stability of singular solutions to the Navier-Stokes system.J. Differential Equations, 314:316–339, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    H. J. Choe and H. Kim. Isolated singularity for the stationary Navier-Stokes system.J. Math. Fluid Mech., 2:151–184, 2000

    work page 2000

  8. [8]

    K. S. Chou and T. Y. H. Wan. Asymptotic radial symmetry for solutions of δu+e u = 0 in a punctured disc.Pacific J. Math., 163(2):269–276, 1994

    work page 1994

  9. [9]

    R. H. Dyer and D. E. Edmunds. Removable singularities of solutions of the Navier- Stokes equations.J. London Math. Soc., 2:535–538, 1970

    work page 1970

  10. [10]

    Erd´ elyi, W

    A. Erd´ elyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, and F. Tricomi.Higher Transcendental Functions, volume I. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953

    work page 1953

  11. [11]

    M. A. Goldshtik. A paradoxical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations.Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 24:610–621, 1960. English transl.,J. Appl. Math. Mech.24(1960), 913-929

    work page 1960

  12. [12]

    A. V. Gusarov. Analytic similarity solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations for a jet in a half space with the no-slip boundary condition.Phys. Fluids, 32:053104, 2020

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Huang and D

    X. Huang and D. Ye. On sharp anisotropic Hardy inequalities.Int. Math. Res. Not., (9):rnaf110, 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Jiang, L

    Z. Jiang, L. Li, and W. Lu. Existence of axisymmetric and homogeneous solutions of Navier-Stokes equations in cone regions.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 14(12):4231–4258, 2021

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Kajikiya and T

    R. Kajikiya and T. Miyakawa. Onl 2 decay of weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations inR n.Math. Z., 192(1):135–148, 1986

    work page 1986

  16. [16]

    Karch and D

    G. Karch and D. Pilarczyk. Asymptotic stability of Landau solutions to Navier- Stokes system.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 202:115–131, 2011

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Karch, D

    G. Karch, D. Pilarczyk, and M. E. Schonbek.l 2-asymptotic stability of singular solutions to the Navier-Stokes system of equations inR 3.J. Math. Pures Appl., 108(1):14–40, 2017

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    T. Kato. Strongl p solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations inR m, with applica- tions to weak solutions.Math. Z., 187:471–480, 1984

    work page 1984

  19. [19]

    Kim and H

    H. Kim and H. Kozono. A removable isolated singularity theorem for the station- ary Navier-Stokes equations.J. Differential Equations, 220(1):68–84, 2006. 27

    work page 2006

  20. [20]

    Korolev and V

    A. Korolev and V. ˇSver´ ak. On the large-distance asymptotic of steady state solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations in 3D exterior domains.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 28(2):303–313, 2011

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    Kwon and T.-P

    H. Kwon and T.-P. Tsai. On bifurcation of self-similar solutions of the stationary Navier-Stokes equations.Commun. Math. Sci., 19(6):1703–1733, 2021

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    L. Landau. A new exact solution of Navier-Stokes equations.Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 43:299–301, 1944

    work page 1944

  23. [23]

    P. G. Lemari´ e-Rieusset.Recent Developments in the Navier-Stokes Problem. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2002

    work page 2002

  24. [24]

    J. Leray. Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace.Acta Math., 63:193–248, 1934

    1934

  25. [25]

    L. Li, Y. Y. Li, and X. Yan. Homogeneous solutions of stationary Navier-Stokes equations with isolated singularities on the unit sphere. I. One singularity.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 227(3):1091–1163, 2018

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    L. Li, Y. Y. Li, and X. Yan. Homogeneous solutions of stationary Navier-Stokes equations with isolated singularities on the unit sphere. II. Classification of ax- isymmetric no-swirl solutions.J. Differential Equations, 264(10):6082–6108, 2018

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    L. Li, Y. Y. Li, and X. Yan. Homogeneous solutions of stationary Navier-Stokes equations with isolated singularities on the unit sphere. III. Existence of ax- isymmetric solutions with nonzero swirl.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. A, 39(12):7163–7211, 2019

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    L. Li, Y. Y. Li, and X. Yan. Vanishing viscosity limit for homogeneous axisym- metric no-swirl solutions of stationary Navier-Stokes equations.J. Funct. Anal., 277(10):3599–3652, 2019

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    L. Li, Y. Y. Li, and X. Yan. Asymptotic expansion and singular force of (−1)- homogeneous axisymmetric no-swirl solutions of stationary Navier-Stokes equa- tions near singular rays. In preparation, 2024

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    L. Li, Y. Y. Li, and X. Yan. Removable singularity of (−1)-homogeneous so- lutions of stationary Navier-Stokes equations.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 2024. arXiv:2410.11170 [math.AP], to appear

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Y. Y. Li and X. Yan. Asymptotic stability of homogeneous solutions of incompress- ible stationary Navier-Stokes equations.J. Differential Equations, 297:226–245, 2021

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Y. Y. Li and X. Yan. Anisotropic Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg type inequalities. Adv. Math., 419:108958, 2023

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Y. Y. Li, J. Zhang, and T. Zhang. Asymptotic stability of Landau solutions to Navier-Stokes system underl p-perturbations.J. Math. Fluid Mech., 25:5, 2023. 28

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Liouville

    J. Liouville. Sur l’´ equation aux diff´ erences partielles∂2 logλ/∂u∂v±λ/2a 2 = 0. J. Math. Pures Appl., 18:71–72, 1853

    work page

  35. [35]

    Luo and R

    X. Luo and R. Shvydkoy. 2D homogeneous solutions to the Euler equation.Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 40(9):1666–1687, 2015

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    K. Masuda. Weak solutions of Navier-Stokes equations.Tˆ ohoku Math. J., 36(4):623–646, 1984

    work page 1984

  37. [37]

    Miura and T.-P

    H. Miura and T.-P. Tsai. Point singularities of 3D stationary Navier-Stokes flows. J. Math. Fluid Mech., 14:33–41, 2012

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    S. A. Nazarov and K. Pileckas. On steady Stokes and Navier-Stokes problems with zero velocity at infinity in a three-dimensional exterior domain.J. Math. Kyoto Univ., 40(3):475–492, 2000

    work page 2000

  39. [39]

    F. W. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark, editors.NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    A. F. Pillow and R. Paull. Conically similar viscous flows. Part 1. Basic conser- vation principles and characterization of axial causes in swirl-free flow.J. Fluid Mech., 155:327–341, 1985

    work page 1985

  41. [41]

    A. F. Pillow and R. Paull. Conically similar viscous flows. Part 2. One-parameter swirl-free flows.J. Fluid Mech., 155:343–358, 1985

    work page 1985

  42. [42]

    A. F. Pillow and R. Paull. Conically similar viscous flows. Part 3. Characterization of axial causes in swirling flow and the one-parameter flow generated by a uniform half-line source of kinematic swirl angular momentum.J. Fluid Mech., 155:359– 379, 1985

    work page 1985

  43. [43]

    M. E. Schonbek.l 2 decay for weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 88:209–222, 1985

    work page 1985

  44. [44]

    J. Serrin. The swirling vortex.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, 271(1214):325– 360, 1972

    work page 1972

  45. [45]

    V. Shapiro. Isolated singularities of solutions of the nonlinear stationary Navier- Stokes equations.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 187:335–363, 1974

    work page 1974

  46. [46]

    V. Shapiro. A counterexample in the theory of planar viscous incompressible flow. J. Differential Equations, 22(1):164–179, 1976

    work page 1976

  47. [47]

    V. Shapiro. Isolated singularities in steady-state fluid flow.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 7(4):577–601, 1976

    work page 1976

  48. [48]

    Shvydkoy

    R. Shvydkoy. Homogeneous solutions to the 3D Euler system.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 370(4):2517–2535, 2018. 29

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    N. A. Slezkin. On an exact solution of the equations of viscous flow.Uch. Zap. MGU, pages 89–90, 1934

    work page 1934

  50. [50]

    H. B. Squire. The round laminar jet.Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math., 4(3):321–329, 1951

    work page 1951

  51. [51]

    Temam.Navier-Stokes Equations: Theory and Numerical Analysis

    R. Temam.Navier-Stokes Equations: Theory and Numerical Analysis. North- Holland, Amsterdam, 1977

    work page 1977

  52. [52]

    Tian and Z

    G. Tian and Z. P. Xin. One-point singular solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal., 11(1):135–145, 1998

    work page 1998

  53. [53]

    ˇSver´ ak

    V. ˇSver´ ak. On Landau’s solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations.J. Math. Sci., 179:208–228, 2011. Problems in Mathematical Analysis, No. 61

    work page 2011

  54. [54]

    C. Y. Wang. Exact solutions of the steady-state Navier-Stokes equations.Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 23:159–177, 1991

    work page 1991

  55. [55]

    V. I. Yatseyev. On a class of exact solutions of the equations of motion of a viscous fluid.Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 73:1121–1124, 1950

    work page 1950

  56. [56]

    Zhang and T

    J. Zhang and T. Zhang. Local well-posedness of perturbed Navier-Stokes system around Landau solutions.Electron. Res. Arch., 29(4):2719–2739, 2021

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Asymptotic stability of homogeneous solutions to Navier-Stokes equations under $L^{p}$-perturbations

    Z. Zhao and X. Zheng. Asymptotic stability of homogeneous solutions to Navier- Stokes equations underl p-perturbations.arXiv:2304.00840 [math.AP], 2023. 30

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  58. [244]

    North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2004. 26

    work page 2004

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.