Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 103 references

Fluctuation-Induced Bistability in the Dissipative Dynamics of Generic Cavity-Matter Quantum Systems

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fluctuation-induced bistability—two coexisting steady states generated by quantum fluctuations—is, the paper claims, a generic feature of strongly interacting cavity-coupled matter, arising from photon-assisted resonances in spins, fermions

desk verdict Solid evidence that fluctuation-induced bistability is a genuine beyond-mean-field effect across fermions, bosons, and spins, but the thermodynamic-limit stabilization claim rests on a fragile three-point extrapolation. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21296 v1 pith:OFPYVWCI submitted 2026-07-23 cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.str-elquant-ph

Luisa Tolle , Simon B. Jäger , Ameneh Sheikhan , Corinna Kollath , Catalin-Mihai Halati This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords fluctuation-inducedbistabilitycavityquantumelectrodynamicsdissipativemany-bodydynamicspolarontransformationdressed-staterateequationmetastabilityFermi-HubbardmodelBose-Hubbard
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The authors set out to prove that fluctuation-induced bistability is not a special-case artifact but a robust consequence of strong interactions, strong light-matter coupling, and dissipation. They find the same bistable behavior in spin-1 chains, Fermi-Hubbard, and Bose-Hubbard models globally coupled to a lossy cavity, and trace it to a common mechanism: photon-assisted resonances that match photonic transitions to many-body energy gaps, making energy transfer efficient and stabilizing multiple macroscopic states. To study its dynamics they build a dressed-state rate equation based on a polaron transformation, which lets them simulate hundreds of sites over long times. The relaxation between bistable peaks slows down exponentially with system size, suggesting true steady-state bistability in the thermodynamic limit, and even small systems show precursor signatures in exact tensor-network simulations. A sympathetic reader would care because this establishes a universal phenomenon and gives concrete, experimentally accessible predictions across a wide class of hybrid quantum platforms.

What carries the argument

The central object is the polaron transformation D = exp[(χ↠− χ*â)Θ], which displaces the cavity field by an amount proportional to the matter imbalance operator Θ. In the transformed frame, the dressed states |n, χΘ_n⟩ (matter eigenstates of Θ times a cavity coherent state) are stationary in the absence of tunneling; the rate equation for the probabilities P_n on these dressed states, derived by projecting out fast photonic degrees of freedom, carries all the slow dynamics. Its rates R_{n→n'} contain an integral over ΔE_{n',n} and ΔΘ_{n',n}, and it is the resonance condition encoded in this integral—not any particular statistics—that produces the bistable peaks and their exponential size

What would settle it

Run the same DSRE simulation for L=448 and L=672 and check whether ln(ħγ/J) still falls on the straight line fitted to the three smaller sizes; alternatively, push exact tMPS (or a better method) to L=28 or larger and see whether the low-|θ| peak persists in the true steady state. If the rate at larger L deviates upward from the exponential law, or if any finite-L system eventually fully transfers probability to the high-|θ| peak with a rate that does not vanish exponentially, the claimed thermodynamic-limit bistability is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim: fluctuation-induced bistability, first reported for fermionic atoms in a cavity, appears equally in bosonic and spin systems, unified by one mechanism—resonances between photonic transitions and many-body energy scales (in the small-tunneling limit, 2ħgλ ≈ pU ± ħδ). The bistability appears only with quantum fluctuations of the light-matter coupling; mean-field theory misses it. The dressed-state rate equation, derived via a polaron transformation, treats light-matter coupling exactly and tunneling perturbatively, showing the low-imbalance peak is metastable at finite size with an escape rate decaying exponentially with system size—implying stabilization in the thermodynami

Load-bearing premise

The thermodynamic-limit claim that the low-imbalance peak becomes truly stable rests on an exponential fit of escape rate versus system size taken from only three sizes (L=112, 224, 336); if that three-point extrapolation fails at larger L, the phenomenon is long-lived metastability rather than genuine steady-state bistability.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fluctuation-induced bistability is independent of particle statistics: the same phenomenon appears for interacting spins, fermions, and bosons coupled to a dissipative cavity.
  • In the small-tunneling limit the bistable regions sit at the resonance condition 2ħgλ ≈ pU ± ħδ, giving a quantitative guide for where to search experimentally in each model.
  • For finite systems the low-imbalance peak is only metastable, but its lifetime grows exponentially with system size (γ ∝ a^{-L}), so in the thermodynamic limit it becomes a true steady state.
  • Signatures of the bistability—non-monotonic imbalance versus coupling and strongly slowed dynamics—appear already for systems as small as L=14 in exact tMPS simulations, meaning small-scale experiments can see them.
  • The dressed-state rate equation opens access to parameter regimes (large L, long times) that are out of reach for exact tensor-network methods, enabling systematic studies of metastability across models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: if the exponential slowing persists, the bistability functions as a dissipative two-state memory whose switching time is tunable by system size—an engineering consequence the paper does not discuss.
  • Editorial: because the mechanism is purely about resonance between a photonic mode and many-body energy scales, it should transfer to other platforms with a globally coupled lossy bosonic mode and strong interactions, such as optomechanical or photonic arrays.
  • Editorial: a clean experimental probe would be the cavity field statistics: in the bistable regime the Glauber-Sudarshan P function, which the DSRE maps directly to p(θ), should become bimodal.
  • Editorial: a testable extension is to go beyond the perturbative-tunneling DSRE for moderate J, where finite-tunneling corrections (already visible in tMPS as reduced ⟨θ²⟩) may shrink or shift the bistable region; comparing the two approaches as a function of J/U would settle how much of the effect survives at larger tunneling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the dissipative dynamics of one-dimensional interacting many-body systems (spin-1, spinful fermions, and spinless bosons) globally coupled to a lossy cavity. It claims that fluctuation-induced bistability, previously found for fermionic atoms, is a robust and generic phenomenon across particle statistics, arising from a common resonance mechanism between photonic transitions and many-body energy scales. The authors use two approximate methods (mean-field plus fluctuations, MF+fluct., and a newly introduced dressed-state rate equation, DSRE) and compare with numerically exact time-dependent matrix product state (tMPS) simulations for small systems. The paper reports bistable steady-state solutions in all three models, shows dynamical signatures of bistability at finite times, and proposes an exponential system-size slowdown of the metastable relaxation, suggesting true stabilization in the thermodynamic limit.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper establishes a generic beyond-mean-field phenomenon in cavity-matter systems and provides a tractable large-scale method (DSRE) for studying dissipative many-body dynamics. The main strengths are the breadth of evidence: three qualitatively different microscopic models, two independent approximate methods with a detailed derivation of DSRE in the Supplemental Material, documented convergence parameters for tMPS, and a data-availability statement. The paper is significant because it suggests that the previously reported fermionic fluctuation-induced bistability is not an artifact of a particular approximation or of fermionic statistics, and it identifies experimentally relevant finite-time signatures in small systems.

major comments (3)
  1. [Scaling with system size, Fig. 2(e)-(f)] The claim that the low-|θ| peak becomes truly stable in the thermodynamic limit rests entirely on the exponential rate law γ ∝ a^{-L} extracted from a linear fit to log(ℏγ/J) at only three system sizes (L=112, 224, 336), with no error bars. With three points one cannot distinguish exponential from power-law or stretched-exponential decay, and a small curvature at larger L would convert 'true stabilization' into merely long-lived metastability. The exact tMPS results are restricted to L≤16 and times Jt/ℏ≤1000 and thus do not constrain this scaling regime. Please provide additional system sizes (e.g., L=448, 560) or an analytical argument for the exponential scaling; otherwise, the abstract and conclusion should be rephrased to claim exponentially long-lived metastability rather than steady-state bistability in the thermodynamic limit.
  2. [Dressed-State Rate Equation, Eqs. (6)-(8), and SM §'Dissipative dynamics results'] The DSRE ansatz Eq. (6) explicitly neglects coherences between eigenstates with equal Θ_n, which the paper itself notes are long-lived under the approximate strong symmetry (Ref. [64]). The tMPS results in the SM (Figs. 3-4) show substantial off-diagonal atomic coherences (quantified by E_kin and C_2) and finite-tunneling corrections that reduce ⟨θ²⟩ relative to DSRE. Since the rates R_{n→n′} in Eq. (8) are derived under this closure, the system-size dependence γ(L) in Fig. 2(f) may be a closure artifact rather than the true Lindblad relaxation rate. Please assess quantitatively the effect of the omitted same-Θ coherences on the relaxation rate, or at least add an explicit caveat in the main text where the exponential scaling is presented.
  3. [Models and Lindblad equation; text near 'The fluctuation-induced bistability emerges...'] The 'common microscopic mechanism' is summarized by the resonance condition 2ℏgλ≈pU±ℏδ (p=1 for spins and fermions, integer p≥1 for bosons). This condition is not derived in the main text or the SM for the spin-1 and boson models. For the spin-1 model, H∥ is a sum of on-site (S^z_j)^2 terms, and it is not transparent why photon-assisted transitions couple to energy differences pU. Since this resonance condition is presented as the unifying mechanism, please provide the derivation (using Eq. (3) in the small-J limit) or explicitly state it as a heuristic conjecture. This is important for the abstract's claim of a common microscopic mechanism.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 1] The blue lines are plotted as −|θ_MF|, but neither the text nor the caption explains why the mean-field solution is shown with a negative sign while the fluctuation-induced solutions are plotted as positive |θ_th|. Please clarify the convention.
  2. [Eq. (6)] The notation |n, χΘ_n⟩ is used for the coherent-state displaced state, but the displacement parameter χΘ_n is not explicitly defined at first use. Define it near Eq. (4) to improve readability.
  3. [Eq. (3)] The expression for the energy-balance condition is written as '0 = ∂/∂t ⟨H_MF_eff⟩ ∝ ...'. The proportionality is not exact and the various prefactors are suppressed. A brief derivation or an explicit statement that this is an approximation (with the proportionality constant positive) would make the MF+fluct. method more transparent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: both central methods are self-contained and no fitted parameter reduces to the target bistability.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The MF+fluct. equations (2)-(3) are solved self-consistently with no parameters fitted to the target bistability; the multiple stable solutions emerge from the resonance structure of Eq. (3), and the same equations are applied to fermions, spins, and bosons rather than being tuned to reproduce the earlier fermionic result. The DSRE is derived from the Lindblad equation via a polaron transformation and a projector/Mori-Zwanzig elimination (SM Eqs. S.1-S.40); the rates are determined by the microscopic parameters (U, J, g, δ, Γ) and no parameter is fitted to the computed p(θ) distributions. The tMPS comparisons are genuine external checks at L ≤ 16 and finite timescales, not inputs to the DSRE or MF+fluct. methods. The only extrapolation beyond the data is the three-point fit of log γ versus L in Fig. 2(f); this is an empirical scaling statement and an acknowledged limitation, not a reduction by construction. Self-citations [51,52,58-61,64,95] refer to methods and to the prior fermionic finding, but the new results for bosons/spins, the real-time dynamics, and the DSRE are computed in this paper; the strong-symmetry statement is also referenced to external works [89,90]. The paper itself flags that the density-matrix ansatz Eq. (6) omits same-Θ coherences that are long-lived under the approximate strong symmetry, which affects the accuracy of the DSRE rates but does not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated; the polaron transformation is a mathematical tool. The central quantitative predictions rest on a small set of modeling assumptions: the thermalization closure in MF+fluct, the weak-tunneling and no-coherence ansatz in DSRE, and the scaling extrapolation from three system sizes. The boson cutoff and the exponential-fit parameters are the only explicit fitted/truncation numbers.

free parameters (2)
  • boson number cutoff N_max = 2 in Fig. 3; none/1/2/3 in SM comparisons
    The bosonic Hilbert space is truncated at N_max bosons per site; the number and location of bistable regions depend on N_max (SM Fig. 1), so the choice affects the reported bistability structure.
  • exponential scaling parameters gamma_0 and a = extracted from linear fit of log gamma vs L for L=112,224,336
    Fig. 2(e,f): the claim that relaxation times grow exponentially (gamma ∝ a^{-L}) and thus that the low-|theta| peak stabilizes in the thermodynamic limit rests on a 3-point fit.
assumptions (6)
  • ad hoc to paper The matter subsystem rapidly thermalizes to a Gibbs state e^{-beta H_MF_eff} with a single inverse temperature beta fixed by the energy-balance condition (Eq. 3).
    Main text: 'the particles are assumed to thermalize quickly [85]'. This closure defines the MF+fluct steady state; if the driven system does not thermalize, the predicted steady-state bistability is not established. Used in Eq. (3) and Fig. 1.
  • ad hoc to paper Tunneling H_perp can be treated perturbatively to second order, and the density matrix remains diagonal in the Theta eigenbasis with coherent-state photon parts (ansatz Eq. 6).
    DSRE derivation; coherences between states with equal Theta are neglected. SM Figs. 3-4 show exact tMPS results retain sizable coherences that cause deviations from DSRE, so this ansatz is a load-bearing approximation.
  • domain assumption Lindblad master equation (Eq. 1) with Markovian single-mode photon loss accurately models the cavity-matter system.
    Standard Born-Markov treatment of the cavity; this is the starting model, not derived within the paper.
  • domain assumption The coarse-graining time step in the projector derivation exceeds the decay time of e^{Q L0 t}, so the initial-condition term in Eq. (S.7) decays to zero.
    SM projector method; the resulting rates (Eq. 8) depend on this separation of timescales.
  • domain assumption The small-J resonance condition 2 hbar g lambda ≈ pU ± hbar delta captures the relevant photonic-matter energy transfer.
    Stated in the text as the mechanism; it is an approximate reduction of Eq. (3), not proven for all parameters used in the figures.
  • ad hoc to paper The three models (spin-1, fermions, bosons) with Theta = odd-even density imbalance represent 'generic' cavity-matter systems.
    All studied cases use the same coupling operator Theta, one-dimensional lattices, and a single cavity mode; the abstract claims genericity/universality beyond this restricted set.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fluctuation-Induced Bistability in the Dissipative Dynamics of Generic Cavity-Matter Quantum Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OFPYVWCI

@misc{pith2026260721296,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fluctuation-Induced Bistability in the Dissipative Dynamics of Generic Cavity-Matter Quantum Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OFPYVWCI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21296}
}
read the original abstract

We demonstrate that fluctuation-induced bistability is a robust and generic phenomenon in strongly interacting many-body systems with strong light-matter coupling. We identify a common microscopic mechanism based on resonances between photonic transitions and many-body energy scales, unifying the emergence of fluctuation-induced bistability across a broad class of models, including interacting spins, fermions, and bosons coupled to cavity modes. We develop complementary methods to study both the steady-state properties of fluctuation-induced bistability and its dynamical formation at finite times. In particular, we introduce the dressed-state rate equation approach, which reveals rich metastable dynamics and enables the investigation of its system-size dependence. By comparing its predictions with numerically-exact tensor-network simulations, we identify signatures of fluctuation-induced bistability already in small systems on finite timescales. Our results establish fluctuation-induced bistability as a universal feature of dissipative cavity-coupled many-body systems and provide a general framework for the investigation of its non-equilibrium dynamics across a wide range of hybrid quantum platforms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21296 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Sketch of (a) the spin-1 system, (c) spinful fermions, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. shows the dynamics of p(θ) for J t/ℏ ≤ 1000, L = 224, and (a) ℏg = 14J (no bistability), (b) ℏg = 22J (bistability). In both cases, the distribution rapidly evolves from θ = 0 to peaks at finite ±|θ| (only neg￾ative peaks are shown due to symmetry). This is fol￾lowed by slower evolution where the peaks converge to larger |θ|. In (a), outside the bistable regime, the dis￾tribution relaxes to a single stationary value… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. of the main text. We show that the general be￾havior is very similar for all three models. For each case, we compute p(θ) using the DSRE method over a finite evolution time J t/ℏ. The result￾ing peak of the distribution, shown as the shaded region in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: tMPS time evolution of several observables: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [64]

    Halati, A

    C.-M. Halati, A. Sheikhan, G. Morigi, and C. Kollath, Controlling the Dynamics of Atomic Correlations via the Coupling to a Dissipative Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 073604 (2025)

    2025

  2. [1]

    Frisk Kockum, A

    A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori,Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter, Nature Reviews Physics1, 19 (2019)

    2019

  3. [2]

    Forn-D ´ ıaz, L

    P. Forn-D ´ ıaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, and E. Solano,Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025005 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    Mivehvar, F

    F. Mivehvar, F. Piazza, T. Donner, and H. Ritsch,Cav- ity QED with quantum gases: new paradigms in many- body physics, Advances in Physics70, 1 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Schlawin, D

    F. Schlawin, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef,Cavity quantum materials, Applied Physics Reviews9, 011312 (2022). 6

    2022

  7. [7]

    H. M. Bretscher, L. Graziotto, M. H. Michael, A. Mon- tanaro, I.-T. Lu, A. Grankin, J. W. McIver, J. Faist, D. Fausti, M. Eckstein, M. Ruggenthaler, A. Rubio, D. Basov, M. Hafezi, M. Claassen, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef,Fluctuation engineering in cavity quantum materials(2026), arXiv:2604.08666 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    F. H. L. Koppens, D. E. Chang, and F. J. Garc ´ ıa de Abajo,Graphene Plasmonics: A Platform for Strong Light–Matter Interactions, Nano Letters11, 3370 (2011)

    2011

Show all 103 references
  1. [9]

    Cavalleri,Photo-induced superconductivity, Contem- porary Physics59, 31 (2018)

    A. Cavalleri,Photo-induced superconductivity, Contem- porary Physics59, 31 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef,Colloquium: Nonther- mal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Keren, T

    I. Keren, T. A. Webb, S. Zhang, J. Xu, D. Sun, B. S. Y. Kim, D. Shin, S. S. Zhang, J. Zhang, G. Pereira, J. Yao, T. Okugawa, M. H. Michael, E. Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, J. H. Edgar, S. Wolf, M. Julian, R. P. Prasankumar, K. Miya- gawa, K. Kanoda, G. Gu, M. Cothrine, D. Mandrus, M. Bu...

    2026

  4. [12]

    Montanaro, V

    A. Montanaro, V. Plastovets, N. Khatiwada, J. Fiore, G. Jarc, A. Alabbadi, A. Mastropasqua, E. M. Rigoni, S. Y. Mathengattil, S. D. Zilio, F. F. Olsen, F. Novelli, S. Winnerl, M. A. Sentef, D. M. Kennes, A. J. Mil- lis, F. Piazza, and D. Fausti,Cavity-enhanced super- conductin...

    2026 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Zhang, Z

    H. Zhang, Z. Feng, I.-T. Lu, Z. Li, S. Guo, Q. Shang, D. Luan, M. Panmai, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Rubio, and W. Gao,Cavity Enhanced Supercon- ductivity(2026), arXiv:2606.19171 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2026 arXiv

  6. [14]

    D. G. Lidzey, D. D. C. Bradley, M. S. Skolnick, T. Vir- gili, S. Walker, and D. M. Whittaker,Strong exciton– photon coupling in an organic semiconductor microcav- ity, Nature395, 53 (1998)

    1998

  7. [15]

    D. G. Lidzey, D. D. C. Bradley, A. Armitage, S. Walker, and M. S. Skolnick,Photon-Mediated Hybridization of Frenkel Excitons in Organic Semiconductor Microcavi- ties, Science288, 1620 (2000)

    2000

  8. [16]

    Schwartz, J

    T. Schwartz, J. A. Hutchison, C. Genet, and T. W. Ebbesen,Reversible Switching of Ultrastrong Light- Molecule Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 196405 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    Herrera and F

    F. Herrera and F. C. Spano,Cavity-Controlled Chem- istry in Molecular Ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 238301 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Hirai, J

    K. Hirai, J. A. Hutchison, and H. Uji-i,Molecular Chemistry in Cavity Strong Coupling, Chemical Re- views123, 8099 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    I. D. Leroux, M. H. Schleier-Smith, and V. Vuleti´ c,Im- plementation of Cavity Squeezing of a Collective Atomic Spin, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 073602 (2010)

    2010

  12. [20]

    Pezz` e, A

    L. Pezz` e, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein,Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035005 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Y. Xia, A. R. Agrawal, C. M. Pluchar, A. J. Brady, Z. Liu, Q. Zhuang, D. J. Wilson, and Z. Zhang, Entanglement-enhanced optomechanical sensing, Nature Photonics17, 470 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    A. J. Brady, X. Chen, Y. Xia, J. Manley, M. Dey Chowdhury, K. Xiao, Z. Liu, R. Harnik, D. J. Wilson, Z. Zhang, and Q. Zhuang,Entanglement- enhanced optomechanical sensor array with application to dark matter searches, Communications Physics6, 237 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    C. Luo, H. Zhang, V. P. W. Koh, J. D. Wilson, A. Chu, M. J. Holland, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thompson, Momentum-exchange interactions in a Bragg atom in- terferometer suppress Doppler dephasing, Science384, 551 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Baumann, C

    K. Baumann, C. Guerlin, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger,Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity, Nature464, 1301 (2010)

    2010

  17. [25]

    Klinder, H

    J. Klinder, H. Keßler, M. Wolke, L. Mathey, and A. Hemmerich,Dynamical phase transition in the open Dicke model, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112, 3290 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Klinder, H

    J. Klinder, H. Keßler, M. R. Bakhtiari, M. Thorwart, and A. Hemmerich,Observation of a Superradiant Mott Insulator in the Dicke-Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 230403 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    Landig, L

    R. Landig, L. Hruby, N. Dogra, M. Landini, R. Mottl, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger,Quantum phases from competing short- and long-range interactions in an op- tical lattice, Nature532, 476 (2016), letter

    2016

  20. [28]

    Hruby, N

    L. Hruby, N. Dogra, M. Landini, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger,Metastability and avalanche dynamics in strongly correlated gases with long-range interactions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 3279 (2018)

    2018

  21. [30]

    V. D. Vaidya, Y. Guo, R. M. Kroeze, K. E. Ballan- tine, A. J. Koll´ ar, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev,Tunable- Range, Photon-Mediated Atomic Interactions in Multi- mode Cavity QED, Phys. Rev. X8, 011002 (2018)

    2018

  22. [31]

    Keßler, P

    H. Keßler, P. Kongkhambut, C. Georges, L. Mathey, J. G. Cosme, and A. Hemmerich,Observation of a Dissipative Time Crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 043602 (2021)

    2021

  23. [32]

    Ferri, R

    F. Ferri, R. Rosa-Medina, F. Finger, N. Dogra, M. Sori- ente, O. Zilberberg, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, Emerging Dissipative Phases in a Superradiant Quan- tum Gas with Tunable Decay, Phys. Rev. X11, 041046 (2021)

    2021

  24. [33]

    Dreon, A

    D. Dreon, A. Baumg¨ artner, X. Li, S. Hertlein, T. Esslinger, and T. Donner,Self-oscillating pump in a topological dissipative atom–cavity system, Nature608, 494 (2022)

    2022

  25. [34]

    Kongkhambut, J

    P. Kongkhambut, J. Skulte, L. Mathey, J. G. Cosme, A. Hemmerich, and H. Keßler,Observation of a con- tinuous time crystal, Science377, 670–673 (2022)

    2022

  26. [35]

    D. J. Young, A. Chu, E. Y. Song, D. Barberena, D. Well- nitz, Z. Niu, V. M. Sch¨ afer, R. J. Lewis-Swan, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thompson,Observing dynamical phases of BCS superconductors in a cavity QED simulator, Na- ture625, 679 (2024)

    2024

  27. [36]

    K. Roux, H. Konishi, V. Helson, and J.-P. Brantut, Strongly correlated Fermions strongly coupled to light, 7 Nature Communications11, 2974 (2020)

    2020

  28. [37]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Chen, Z. Wu, J. Wang, J. Fan, S. Deng, and H. Wu,Observation of a superradiant quantum phase transition in an intracavity degenerate Fermi gas, Science373, 1359 (2021)

    2021

  29. [38]

    Helson, T

    V. Helson, T. Zwettler, F. Mivehvar, E. Colella, K. Roux, H. Konishi, H. Ritsch, and J.-P. Bran- tut,Density-wave ordering in a unitary Fermi gas with photon-mediated interactions, Nature618, 716 (2023)

    2023

  30. [39]

    Z. Wu, J. Fan, X. Zhang, J. Qi, and H. Wu,Signatures of Prethermalization in a Quenched Cavity-Mediated Long-Range Interacting Fermi Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 243401 (2023)

    2023

  31. [40]

    Zwettler, G

    T. Zwettler, G. Del Pace, F. Marijanovic, S. Chattopad- hyay, T. B¨ uhler, C.-M. Halati, L. Skolc, L. Tolle, V. Hel- son, G. Bolognini, A. Fabre, S. Uchino, T. Giamarchi, E. Demler, and J. P. Brantut,Nonequilibrium Dynam- ics of Long-Range Interacting Fermions, Phys. Rev. X 15...

    2025

  32. [41]

    Zwettler, F

    T. Zwettler, F. Marijanovic, T. B¨ uhler, S. Chattopad- hyay, G. Del Pace, L. Skolc, V. Helson, S. Uchino, E. Demler, and J.-P. Brantut,Cavity-mediated charge and pair-density waves in a unitary Fermi gas, Nature Communications17, 496 (2025)

    2025

  33. [42]

    B¨ uhler, A

    T. B¨ uhler, A. Fabre, G. Bolognini, Z. Xue, T. Zwet- tler, G. Del Pace, and J.-P. Brantut,Microscopy of Cavity-Induced Density-Wave Ordering in Ultracold Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 143401 (2026)

    2026

  34. [43]

    M. P. Baden, K. J. Arnold, A. L. Grimsmo, S. Parkins, and M. D. Barrett,Realization of the Dicke Model Using Cavity-Assisted Raman Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 020408 (2014)

    2014

  35. [44]

    S. J. Masson, M. D. Barrett, and S. Parkins,Cavity QED Engineering of Spin Dynamics and Squeezing in a Spinor Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 213601 (2017)

    2017

  36. [45]

    R. M. Kroeze, Y. Guo, V. D. Vaidya, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev,Spinor Self-Ordering of a Quantum Gas in a Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 163601 (2018)

    2018

  37. [46]

    Landini, N

    M. Landini, N. Dogra, K. Kroeger, L. Hruby, T. Don- ner, and T. Esslinger,Formation of a Spin Texture in a Quantum Gas Coupled to a Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 223602 (2018)

    2018

  38. [47]

    Sauerwein, F

    N. Sauerwein, F. Orsi, P. Uhrich, S. Bandyopad- hyay, F. Mattiotti, T. Cantat-Moltrecht, G. Pupillo, P. Hauke, and J.-P. Brantut,Engineering random spin models with atoms in a high-finesse cavity, Nature Physics19, 1128 (2023)

    2023

  39. [48]

    Gopalakrishnan, B

    S. Gopalakrishnan, B. L. Lev, and P. M. Goldbart, Frustration and Glassiness in Spin Models with Cavity- Mediated Interactions, Nat. Phys.5, 845 (2009)

    2009

  40. [49]

    Piazza and P

    F. Piazza and P. Strack,Umklapp Superradiance with a Collisionless Quantum Degenerate Fermi Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 143003 (2014)

    2014

  41. [50]

    M. L. Wall, A. Safavi-Naini, and A. M. Rey,Simulating generic spin-boson models with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. A94, 053637 (2016)

    2016

  42. [51]

    Halati, A

    C.-M. Halati, A. Sheikhan, H. Ritsch, and C. Kol- lath,Numerically Exact Treatment of Many-Body Self- Organization in a Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 093604 (2020)

    2020

  43. [52]

    Halati, A

    C.-M. Halati, A. Sheikhan, and C. Kollath,Theoretical methods to treat a single dissipative bosonic mode cou- pled globally to an interacting many-body system, Phys. Rev. Research2, 043255 (2020)

    2020

  44. [53]

    Chiriac` o, M

    G. Chiriac` o, M. Dalmonte, and T. Chanda,Critical light-matter entanglement at cavity mediated phase tran- sitions, Phys. Rev. B106, 155113 (2022)

    2022

  45. [54]

    Ritsch, P

    H. Ritsch, P. Domokos, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Cold atoms in cavity-generated dynamical optical poten- tials, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 553 (2013)

    2013

  46. [55]

    Kirton, M

    P. Kirton, M. M. Roses, J. Keeling, and E. G. Dalla Torre,Introduction to the Dicke Model: From Equilibrium to Nonequilibrium, and Vice Versa, Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies2, 1800043 (2019)

    2019

  47. [56]

    Carollo and I

    F. Carollo and I. Lesanovsky,Exactness of Mean-Field Equations for Open Dicke Models with an Application to Pattern Retrieval Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 230601 (2021)

    2021

  48. [57]

    Damanet, A

    F. Damanet, A. J. Daley, and J. Keeling,Atom-only descriptions of the driven-dissipative Dicke model, Phys. Rev. A99, 033845 (2019)

    2019

  49. [58]

    A. V. Bezvershenko, C.-M. Halati, A. Sheikhan, C. Kol- lath, and A. Rosch,Dicke Transition in Open Many- Body Systems Determined by Fluctuation Effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 173606 (2021)

    2021

  50. [59]

    Halati, A

    C.-M. Halati, A. Sheikhan, and C. Kollath,Break- ing strong symmetries in dissipative quantum systems: Bosonic atoms coupled to a cavity, Phys. Rev. Research 4, L012015 (2022)

    2022

  51. [60]

    Tolle, A

    L. Tolle, A. Sheikhan, T. Giamarchi, C. Kollath, and C.-M. Halati,Fluctuation-Induced Bistability of Fermionic Atoms Coupled to a Dissipative Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 133602 (2025)

    2025

  52. [61]

    Tolle, A

    L. Tolle, A. Sheikhan, T. Giamarchi, C. Kollath, and C.-M. Halati,Steady-state diagram of interacting fermionic atoms coupled to dissipative cavities, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 023041 (2026)

    2026

  53. [62]

    S. B. J¨ ager, T. Schmit, G. Morigi, M. J. Holland, and R. Betzholz,Lindblad Master Equations for Quantum Systems Coupled to Dissipative Bosonic Modes, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 063601 (2022)

    2022

  54. [63]

    V. Link, K. M¨ uller, R. G. Lena, K. Luoma, F. Damanet, W. T. Strunz, and A. J. Daley,Non-Markovian Quan- tum Dynamics in Strongly Coupled Multimode Cavities Conditioned on Continuous Measurement, PRX Quan- tum3, 020348 (2022)

    2022

  55. [65]

    M¨ uller and W

    K. M¨ uller and W. T. Strunz,Genuine Quantum Effects in Dicke-Type Models at Large Atom Numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 123602 (2025)

    2025

  56. [66]

    Halati, A

    C.-M. Halati, A. Sheikhan, G. Morigi, C. Kollath, and S. B. J¨ ager,From Light-Cone to Supersonic Propagation of Correlations by Competing Short- and Long-Range Couplings, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 190402 (2025)

    2025

  57. [67]

    G. Orso, J. Zakrzewski, and P. Deuar,Self-Organized Cavity Bosons beyond the Adiabatic Elimination Ap- proximation, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 183405 (2025)

    2025

  58. [68]

    Schmit, C.-M

    T. Schmit, C.-M. Halati, T. Donner, G. Morigi, and S. B. J¨ ager,Master equation for a quantum gas of po- larizable particles in cavities, Phys. Rev. A113, 033719 (2026)

    2026

  59. [69]

    Flottat, L

    T. Flottat, L. d. F. de Parny, F. H´ ebert, V. G. Rousseau, and G. G. Batrouni,Phase diagram of bosons in a two- dimensional optical lattice with infinite-range cavity- mediated interactions, Phys. Rev. B95, 144501 (2017). 8

    2017

  60. [70]

    Himbert, C

    L. Himbert, C. Cormick, R. Kraus, S. Sharma, and G. Morigi,Mean-field phase diagram of the extended Bose-Hubbard model of many-body cavity quantum elec- trodynamics, Phys. Rev. A99, 043633 (2019)

    2019

  61. [71]

    T. Wu, S. Ray, and J. Kroha,Temporal Bistability in the Dissipative Dicke-Bose-Hubbard System, Annalen der Physik536, 2300505 (2024)

    2024

  62. [72]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudar- shan,Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N- level systems, Journal of Mathematical Physics17, 821 (1976)

    1976

  63. [73]

    Lindblad,On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976)

    G. Lindblad,On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  64. [74]

    Carmichael,An open systems approach to quantum optics(Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1991)

    H. Carmichael,An open systems approach to quantum optics(Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1991)

    1991

  65. [75]

    H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of open quantum systems(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

    2002

  66. [76]

    Maschler, I

    C. Maschler, I. B. Mekhov, and H. Ritsch,Ultracold atoms in optical lattices generated by quantized light fields, The European Physical Journal D46, 545 (2008)

    2008

  67. [77]

    J. J. Garc ´ ıa-Ripoll, S. D¨ urr, N. Syassen, D. M. Bauer, M. Lettner, G. Rempe, and J. I. Cirac,Dissipation- induced hard-core boson gas in an optical lattice, New Journal of Physics11, 013053 (2009)

    2009

  68. [78]

    Reiter and A

    F. Reiter and A. S. Sørensen,Effective operator formal- ism for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A85, 032111 (2012)

    2012

  69. [79]

    E. M. Kessler,Generalized Schrieffer-Wolff formalism for dissipative systems, Phys. Rev. A86, 012126 (2012)

    2012

  70. [80]

    Poletti, P

    D. Poletti, P. Barmettler, A. Georges, and C. Kol- lath,Emergence of Glasslike Dynamics for Dissipative and Strongly Interacting Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 195301 (2013)

    2013

  71. [81]

    Zanardi and L

    P. Zanardi and L. Campos Venuti,Coherent Quantum Dynamics in Steady-State Manifolds of Strongly Dissi- pative Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 240406 (2014)

    2014

  72. [82]

    Sciolla, D

    B. Sciolla, D. Poletti, and C. Kollath,Two-Time Corre- lations Probing the Dynamics of Dissipative Many-Body Quantum Systems: Aging and Fast Relaxation, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 170401 (2015)

    2015

  73. [83]

    Lange, Z

    F. Lange, Z. Lenarˇ ciˇ c, and A. Rosch,Time-dependent generalized Gibbs ensembles in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B97, 165138 (2018)

    2018

  74. [84]

    Lenarˇ ciˇ c, F

    Z. Lenarˇ ciˇ c, F. Lange, and A. Rosch,Perturbative ap- proach to weakly driven many-particle systems in the presence of approximate conservation laws, Phys. Rev. B97, 024302 (2018)

    2018

  75. [85]

    De Marco, L

    J. De Marco, L. Tolle, C.-M. Halati, A. Sheikhan, A. M. L¨ auchli, and C. Kollath,Level statistics of the one- dimensional ionic Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033119 (2022)

    2022

  76. [86]

    The Supplemental Material also includes Refs

    See Supplemental Material for additional details on the dependence of fluctuation-induced bistability on the lo- cal Hilbert space structure, the derivation of the DSRE, and the tMPS simulations, including additional numer- ical results and real-time dynamics. The Supplemental...

  77. [87]

    G. D. Mahan,Many-particle physics(Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2013

  78. [88]

    B. P. Marsh, Y. Guo, R. M. Kroeze, S. Gopalakrish- nan, S. Ganguli, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev,Enhancing Associative Memory Recall and Storage Capacity Using Confocal Cavity QED, Phys. Rev. X11, 021048 (2021)

    2021

  79. [89]

    V. V. Albert and L. Jiang,Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014)

    2014

  80. [90]

    Buˇ ca and T

    B. Buˇ ca and T. Prosen,A note on symmetry reductions of the Lindblad equation: transport in constrained open spin chains, New Journal of Physics14, 073007 (2012)

    2012

  81. [91]

    Sch¨ utz, H

    S. Sch¨ utz, H. Habibian, and G. Morigi,Cooling of atomic ensembles in optical cavities: Semiclassical limit, Phys. Rev. A88, 033427 (2013)

    2013

  82. [92]

    Gardiner and P

    C. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum Noise(Spinger- Verlag, 2000)

    2000

  83. [93]

    ˇZnidariˇ c,Relaxation times of dissipative many-body quantum systems, Phys

    M. ˇZnidariˇ c,Relaxation times of dissipative many-body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E92, 042143 (2015)

    2015

  84. [94]

    Defenu, T

    N. Defenu, T. Donner, T. Macr ` ı, G. Pagano, S. Ruffo, and A. Trombettoni,Long-range interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 035002 (2023)

    2023

  85. [95]

    Tolle, A

    L. Tolle, A. Sheikhan, C. Kollath, and C.-M. Ha- lati,Matrix product state methods for many-body quan- tum systems coupled to a dissipative bosonic mode, (in prep.)

  86. [96]

    Dalibard, Y

    J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, and K. Mølmer,Wave-function approach to dissipative processes in quantum optics, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 580 (1992)

    1992

  87. [97]

    C. W. Gardiner, A. S. Parkins, and P. Zoller,Wave- function quantum stochastic differential equations and quantum-jump simulation methods, Phys. Rev. A46, 4363 (1992)

    1992

  88. [98]

    A. J. Daley,Quantum trajectories and open many-body quantum systems, Advances in Physics63, 77 (2014)

    2014

  89. [99]

    S. R. White and A. E. Feiguin,Real-Time Evolution Using the Density Matrix Renormalization Group, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 076401 (2004)

    2004

  90. [100]

    A. J. Daley, C. Kollath, U. Schollw¨ ock, and G. Vidal, Time-dependent density-matrix renormalization-group using adaptive effective Hilbert spaces, Journal of Statis- tical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2004, P04005 (2004)

    2004

  91. [101]

    Schollw¨ ock,The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics326, 96 (2011)

    U. Schollw¨ ock,The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics326, 96 (2011)

    2011

  92. [102]

    Haegeman, J

    J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Piˇ zorn, H. Verschelde, and F. Verstraete,Time-Dependent Variational Principle for Quantum Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 070601 (2011)

    2011

  93. [103]

    Haegeman, C

    J. Haegeman, C. Lubich, I. Oseledets, B. Vanderey- cken, and F. Verstraete,Unifying time evolution and optimization with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B 94, 165116 (2016)

    2016

  94. [104]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire,The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calcula- tions, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022)

    2022

  95. [105]

    Fluctuation- Induced Bistability in the Dissipative Dynamics of Generic Cavity-Matter Quantum Systems

    L. Tolle, S. B. J¨ ager, A. Sheikhan, C. Kollath, and C.- M. Halati, (2026). Figure data for article “Fluctuation- Induced Bistability in the Dissipative Dynamics of Generic Cavity-Matter Quantum Systems” [Data set]. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.21489759 9 SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL DE...

    2026 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.