Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Models to Adversarial Attacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.09856 v3 pith:OG3K62V6 submitted 2017-11-27 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords adversarialsegmentationmodelsmultiscaleprocessingrobustnesssemanticattacks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have demonstrated exceptional performance on most recognition tasks such as image classification and segmentation. However, they have also been shown to be vulnerable to adversarial examples. This phenomenon has recently attracted a lot of attention but it has not been extensively studied on multiple, large-scale datasets and structured prediction tasks such as semantic segmentation which often require more specialised networks with additional components such as CRFs, dilated convolutions, skip-connections and multiscale processing. In this paper, we present what to our knowledge is the first rigorous evaluation of adversarial attacks on modern semantic segmentation models, using two large-scale datasets. We analyse the effect of different network architectures, model capacity and multiscale processing, and show that many observations made on the task of classification do not always transfer to this more complex task. Furthermore, we show how mean-field inference in deep structured models, multiscale processing (and more generally, input transformations) naturally implement recently proposed adversarial defenses. Our observations will aid future efforts in understanding and defending against adversarial examples. Moreover, in the shorter term, we show how to effectively benchmark robustness and show which segmentation models should currently be preferred in safety-critical applications due to their inherent robustness.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Relationship Between Network Similarity and Transferability of Adversarial Attacks

    cs.CR 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Similarity between CNN architectures does not robustly predict transferred adversarial attack success, and the reported high-accuracy decision-tree predictor likely relies on a data-splitting artifact.

Pith tools