Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Band Gap in Silicon Nanocrystallites

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cond-mat/0107451 v1 pith:OGMZ66H3 submitted 2001-07-21 cond-mat

classification cond-mat
keywords disagreementexperimentexperimentalnanocrystallitesrecentsizesstate-of-the-arttheoretical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The gap in semiconductor nanocrystallites has been extensively studied both theoretically and experimentally over the last two decades. We have compared a recent ``state-of-the-art'' theoretical calculation with a recent ``state-of-the-art'' experimental observation of the gap in Si nanocrystallite. We find that the two are in substantial disagreement, with the disagreement being more pronounced at smaller sizes. Theoretical calculations appear to over-estimate the gap. Recognizing that the experimental observations are for a distribution of crystallite sizes, we proffer a phenomenological model to reconcile the theory with the experiment. We suggest that similar considerations must dictate comparisons between the theory and experiment vis-a-vis other properties such as radiative rate, decay constant, absorption coefficient, etc.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools