Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 114 references

All planar three-loop Feynman integrals for the production of two vector bosons at hadron colliders

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper computes all planar three-loop Feynman integrals needed for the leading-colour N3LO QCD corrections to the production of two massive vector bosons at hadron colliders.

desk verdict Completes the planar two-mass three-loop four-point integral set with validated numerics; the 'all' claim rests on an unproved nine-family classification that should be tightened. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.02999 v3 pith:OGRMHNR2 submitted 2025-12-02 hep-ph

Dhimiter Canko , Mattia Pozzoli This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords Feynmanintegralsmasterthree-loopvector-bosonpairproductioncanonicaldifferentialequationsplanarN3LOQCDtwomassiveexternallegs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to compute every planar three-loop Feynman integral that enters the leading-colour N3LO QCD corrections to the production of two massive or off-shell vector bosons at hadron colliders. It organises these integrals into nine four-point families with massless internal propagators and two external massive legs, covering both equal and different masses. For each family it constructs a pure basis of master integrals whose differential equations take canonical logarithmic form, and it evaluates the integrals numerically by generalised power series expansions. If the classification is complete, this supplies the last missing planar virtual ingredient for three-loop diboson amplitude computations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the canonical differential equation for a pure basis of master integrals: a choice of integrals that makes the dimensional-regulator dependence factor out and leaves only logarithmic one-forms, or letters. This reduces evaluation of the integrals to iterated integrals over a finite alphabet. The paper builds these pure bases sector by sector, using finite-field reconstruction to manage the algebraic complexity, and determines the alphabet from the singularity structure of the differential equations.

What would settle it

Finding a planar three-loop four-point integral with two massive external legs and massless internal propagators whose top sector is not contained in any of the nine families would disprove the completeness claim; alternatively, exhibiting a physical phase-space point that cannot be connected to the boundary point by a straight line inside the physical region would break the evaluation pipeline.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a complete set of canonical differential equations for all planar three-loop four-point integrals with two massive external legs. The nine families—two reducible, three ladder-box, four tennis-court topologies—are each equipped with a pure basis of master integrals and a connection matrix of logarithmic one-forms; the alphabet contains 37 letters in the general mass case and 22 in the equal-mass case, including four square roots not present at two loops. Boundary values are fixed at a physical phase-space point, and the integrals are evaluated by solving the differential equations as generalised power series expansions, with independent numerical checks at several ph

Load-bearing premise

The completeness claim rests on the unproven assertion that every planar three-loop integral with two massive external legs and massless propagators belongs to one of the nine listed families, and the numerical pipeline assumes the chosen boundary point reaches the whole physical region by straight lines, a property verified numerically rather than proven.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The nine families, in both equal- and different-mass configurations, are now available in canonical form with a numerical evaluation pipeline for physical kinematics.
  • The planar virtual master integrals required for leading-colour N3LO diboson amplitudes are, on this paper's claim, complete; three-loop amplitude computations can proceed on this basis.
  • Because the solutions are iterated integrals of logarithmic one-forms, the results enable further formal study of the integrals' algebraic structure.
  • The alphabet contains more letters and square roots than the two-loop case, showing that analytic complexity grows with loop order when two external masses are present.
  • Independent numerical checks at multiple phase-space points agree to 16 digits, and the equal-mass ladder-box families match an existing analytic solution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The nine-family classification is asserted without derivation or citation; a tenth planar topology with two massive legs would invalidate the word 'all'. This is an editorial caution, not a failure of the construction.
  • The paper explicitly stops at planar virtual integrals: non-planar contributions, top-quark loops, and real-emission pieces are outside its scope, so a full N3LO cross-section still requires those ingredients.
  • A self-inserted note in the manuscript flags unclear notation in the figure for the 15-integral sector; the ancillary files supply the definitions, so this is a presentation gap rather than a mathematical one.
  • Since the five square roots are not simultaneously rationalisable, a fully analytic multiple-polylogarithm solution may require splitting the integration domain and rationalising subsets at each stage—a testable direction the paper itself suggests.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper presents the computation of all planar three-loop four-point Feynman integrals with two massive external legs, in both equal- and different-mass configurations, intended for the leading-colour N3LO QCD corrections to vector-boson pair production. The integrals are organized into nine families (two reducible, three ladder-box, four tennis-court), grouped into two 15-propagator superfamilies. For each family, the authors construct pure master integrals, canonical ε-factorised differential equations, and the associated dlog alphabets, using finite-field IBP reduction and a bottom-up basis construction. Numerical values are obtained by generalised power series expansions with boundary conditions from AMFlow. Validation is performed against independent AMFlow evaluations at three phase-space points per mass configuration, against the analytic results of [23] for the equal-mass PL1 and PL2 families, and by a 16-digit precision self-consistency check. The paper provides ancillary files with the master-integral definitions, the connection matrices, boundary values, and evaluation scripts.

Significance. The combination of a canonical-DE database for nine two-mass planar three-loop four-point families with a working numerical evaluation pipeline is a substantial technical contribution. If the completeness of the nine-family set and the coverage of the physical region are established, this work supplies the last missing ingredient for the purely virtual part of N3LO diboson production in leading colour. The paper ships machine-readable ancillary files and a reproducible evaluation workflow; the extensive numerical cross-checks (16-digit agreement) are a notable strength. The observed enlargement of the alphabet relative to two loops is also of independent interest for the analytic structure of Feynman integrals.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.2, Figs. 1–3] The classification of all planar three-loop four-point integrals with two massive external legs into the nine families is stated without proof or citation: 'all planar three-loop Feynman integrals relevant to the production of two vector bosons belong to the nine integral families' (Sec. 2.2). This assertion is load-bearing for the abstract's 'all planar' claim. A missing topology would invalidate the headline even though the nine individual computations are correct. Please add a rigorous justification: either an explicit enumeration of planar three-loop graphs showing that every relevant graph is a subgraph of one of the 15-propagator superfamilies F123/F132, or a citation to a published classification. If such a proof is not available, the claims should be softened to 'the nine families considered here'.
  2. [§4, eqs. (4.1)–(4.3)] The claim that the different-mass physical region is covered by the stated evaluation protocol rests on two unproven statements: (i) every point on the m4-axis segment from (4.1) to (4.3) is physical, and (ii) for fixed masses the physical region is star-shaped with respect to (4.3). The text says these were verified with Reduce, but no script or output is included. Because this underpins the advertised 'any physical point' evaluation, please make the verification reproducible (e.g., include the Reduce command and result as an ancillary file) or give an analytic argument. Also state explicitly the caveat about the letter m3^2-m4^2 and the recommended mass ordering.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§3.1.1 (and text overall)] The section appears twice in the manuscript text, and the second occurrence contains an embedded editorial note '[DC: Notation a bit unclear...]'. The reference for the equal-mass sector is inconsistent: the text mentions [23] in one place and [24] in the duplicate, and the footnote listing integrals T59, T61, T62, T63, T66, T67 also switches between [23] and [24]. Please remove the duplicate and editorial note and reconcile the citations.
  2. [§3.2] The completeness of the 37-letter alphabet is justified by assumptions (q_j=1, c=±4, restriction (3.18)) that are described as observations from [101]. Since the 'new letters' and 'new square roots' conclusions in Section 5 rest on this alphabet, please state explicitly that the alphabet is determined by this heuristic (with numerical validation) rather than by a proven classification.
  3. [§4] Typo 'prefect agreement' should be 'perfect agreement'. Also, the claim about the m4-axis connectivity should include the explicit Reduce query or a statement that the verification script is provided in the ancillary files.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: master integrals are derived from IBP reduction and canonical differential equations, with AMFlow boundary conditions and independent AMFlow / [23] cross-checks.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The master-integral bases are obtained from integration-by-parts reduction with FFIntRed/FiniteFlow, the pure bases are constructed via standard canonical-DE techniques (Magnus, DlogBasis, Baikov), and the numerical values are obtained by solving the DEs with generalised power series expansions using AMFlow boundary values. No target integral or final numerical value is fed back into the construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Validation is external to the pipeline: independent AMFlow evaluations at multiple phase-space points agree to 16 digits, and the equal-mass PL1/PL2 families agree with the analytic solution of [23]. Self-citations to [24] are limited to notation, square-root naming, letter naming, and the general basis-construction strategy; the six families previously computed in [23,24] are re-derived in this paper rather than imported as black-box evidence. The genuine caveats are completeness or robustness concerns, not circularity: Sec. 2.2 asserts without derivation that all planar two-mass three-loop four-point integrals belong to the nine families, and Sec. 4 states that the different-mass physical-region connectivity of boundary point (4.3) was verified empirically with Reduce rather than proved. These points bear on whether the 'all planar' and full-phase-space claims are fully established, but they do not reduce any computed result to an input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces and fits no free parameters; the central computation is a derivation. The premises it rests on are standard technical machinery plus three structural assumptions: the nine-family topology classification, the star-shaped physical-region coverage, and the sufficiency of the ansätze used to complete the canonical bases and alphabet. The latter two are empirically checked in the paper.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Dimensional regularization with d=4−2ε and IBP identities reduce each family to a finite set of master integrals.
    Standard framework for multiloop integrals, invoked in Secs. 2.2 and 3.1.
  • domain assumption All planar three-loop four-point integrals with two massive external legs and massless propagators fall into exactly nine families (PL1-3, PT1-4, RL1-2).
    Stated in Sec. 2.2 without proof or citation; load-bearing for the 'all' claim.
  • domain assumption For fixed masses the physical region is star-shaped and every target point is reachable from the boundary point (4.3) by a straight line.
    Sec. 4: verified with Reduce/observed, not proven; needed for numerical coverage of the physical region.
  • ad hoc to paper The ansatz (3.12) with linear λ-dependence suffices to decouple the two problematic integrals; the transformation (3.13) renders the DEs canonical on the maximal cut.
    Sec. 3.1.1: only the sufficiency of this particular ansatz is checked, no general construction.
  • ad hoc to paper In building the missing algebraic letters, assuming q_j=1 in (3.14), c=±4 in (3.17) and the restriction (3.18) identifies the complete alphabet.
    Sec. 3.2: heuristic/empirical completion following Effortless; the resulting alphabet is validated indirectly by the DE integration.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of All planar three-loop Feynman integrals for the production of two vector bosons at hadron colliders." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OGRMHNR2

@misc{pith2026251202999,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: All planar three-loop Feynman integrals for the production of two vector bosons at hadron colliders},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OGRMHNR2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.02999}
}
read the original abstract

We compute all the planar three-loop master integrals relevant for the leading colour N3LO QCD corrections to the production of two massive or off-shell vector bosons at hadron colliders. These integrals are organised into nine four-point integral families with massless internal propagators and two external massive legs. For each family, we construct a basis of pure master integrals and we reconstruct the corresponding canonical differential equations using finite field techniques. We evaluate the master integrals by solving the differential equations using generalised power series expansions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [23]

    Long,Three-loop ladder diagrams with two off-shell legs,2410.15431

    M.-M. Long,Three-loop ladder diagrams with two off-shell legs,2410.15431

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Gehrmann and B

    T. Gehrmann and B. Malaescu,Precision QCD Physics at the LHC,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.72(2022) 233 [2111.02319]

    arXiv 2022

  3. [2]

    Caola, W

    F. Caola, W. Chen, C. Duhr, X. Liu, B. Mistlberger, F. Petriello et al.,The Path forward to N3LO, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.06730]

    arXiv 2021

  4. [3]

    J. Andersen et al.,Les Houches 2023: Physics at TeV Colliders: Standard Model Working Group Report, inPhysics of the TeV Scale and Beyond the Standard Model: Intensifying the Quest for New Physics, 6, 2024 [2406.00708]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [4]

    A. Huss, J. Huston, S. Jones, M. Pellen and R. Röntsch,Les Houches 2023 – Physics at TeV Colliders: Report on the Standard Model Precision Wishlist,2504.06689

    arXiv 2023

  6. [5]

    Smirnov,Analytical result for dimensionally regularized massless on shell planar triple box,Phys

    V.A. Smirnov,Analytical result for dimensionally regularized massless on shell planar triple box,Phys. Lett. B567(2003) 193 [hep-ph/0305142]

    arXiv 2003

  7. [6]

    Henn, A.V

    J.M. Henn, A.V. Smirnov and V.A. Smirnov,Analytic results for planar three-loop four-point integrals from a Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov equation,JHEP07(2013) 128 [1306.2799]

    arXiv 2013

  8. [7]

    Henn, A.V

    J.M. Henn, A.V. Smirnov and V.A. Smirnov,Evaluating single-scale and/or non-planar diagrams by differential equations,JHEP03(2014) 088 [1312.2588]

    arXiv 2014

Show all 114 references
  1. [8]

    J. Henn, B. Mistlberger, V.A. Smirnov and P. Wasser,Constructing d-log integrands and computing master integrals for three-loop four-particle scattering,JHEP04(2020) 167 [2002.09492]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Caola, A

    F. Caola, A. Von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,Diphoton Amplitudes in Three-Loop Quantum Chromodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 112004 [2011.13946]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Bargiela, F

    P. Bargiela, F. Caola, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,Three-loop helicity amplitudes for diphoton production in gluon fusion,JHEP02(2022) 153 [2111.13595]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Caola, A

    F. Caola, A. Chakraborty, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,Three-loop helicity amplitudes for four-quark scattering in massless QCD,JHEP10(2021) 206 [2108.00055]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Caola, A

    F. Caola, A. Chakraborty, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,Three-loop helicity amplitudes for quark-gluon scattering in QCD,JHEP12(2022) 082 [2207.03503]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Caola, A

    F. Caola, A. Chakraborty, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,Three-Loop Gluon Scattering in QCD and the Gluon Regge Trajectory,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 212001 [2112.11097]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Bargiela, A

    P. Bargiela, A. Chakraborty and G. Gambuti,Three-loop helicity amplitudes for photon+jet production,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) L051502 [2212.14069]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Di Vita, P

    S. Di Vita, P. Mastrolia, U. Schubert and V. Yundin,Three-loop master integrals for ladder-box diagrams with one massive leg,JHEP09(2014) 148 [1408.3107]

    2014 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Canko and N

    D.D. Canko and N. Syrrakos,Resummation methods for Master Integrals,JHEP02(2021) 080 [2010.06947]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Canko and N

    D.D. Canko and N. Syrrakos,Planar three-loop master integrals for 2→2 processes with one external massive particle,JHEP04(2022) 134 [2112.14275]. – 17 –

    2022 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Syrrakos and D.D

    N. Syrrakos and D.D. Canko,Three-loop master integrals for H+jet production at N3LO: Towards the non-planar topologies,PoSRADCOR2023(2024) 044 [2307.08432]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [19]

    J.M. Henn, J. Lim and W.J. Torres Bobadilla,First look at the evaluation of three-loop non-planar Feynman diagrams for Higgs plus jet production,JHEP05(2023) 026 [2302.12776]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Gehrmann, J

    T. Gehrmann, J. Henn, P. Jakubčík, J. Lim, C.C. Mella, N. Syrrakos et al.,Graded transcendental functions: an application to four-point amplitudes with one off-shell leg, 2410.19088

    arXiv

  14. [21]

    J.M. Henn, J. Lim and W.J. Torres Bobadilla,Analytic evaluation of the three-loop three-point form factor oftrϕ3 inN= 4sYM,2410.22465

    arXiv

  15. [22]

    X. Guan, B. Mistlberger and M. Ruf,Subleading Color Corrections at Three Loops to the tr(ϕ2)Three-Point Form Factor inN= 4Super Yang-Mills Theory,2511.13845

  16. [24]

    Canko and M

    D. Canko and M. Pozzoli,A first computation of three-loop master integrals for the production of two off-shell vector bosons with different masses,JHEP02(2025) 088 [2412.06972]

    2025

  17. [25]

    Gehrmann, P

    T. Gehrmann, P. Jakubčík, C.C. Mella, N. Syrrakos and L. Tancredi,Planar three-loop QCD helicity amplitudes for V+jet production at hadron colliders,Phys. Lett. B848(2024) 138369 [2307.15405]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    X. Chen, X. Guan and B. Mistlberger,Three-Loop QCD corrections to the production of a Higgs boson and a Jet,2504.06490. [27]ATLAScollaboration,Measurement ofW ±Zproduction cross sections and gauge boson polarisation inppcollisions at √s= 13TeV with the ATLAS detector,Eur. Phys...

    2019 arXiv

  19. [34]

    Gehrmann, L

    T. Gehrmann, L. Tancredi and E. Weihs,Two-loop master integrals forq¯q→V V: the planar topologies,JHEP08(2013) 070 [1306.6344]. – 18 –

    2013 arXiv

  20. [35]

    Gehrmann, A

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel, L. Tancredi and E. Weihs,The two-loop master integrals forq q→V V,JHEP06(2014) 032 [1404.4853]

    2014 arXiv

  21. [36]

    J.M. Henn, K. Melnikov and V.A. Smirnov,Two-loop planar master integrals for the production of off-shell vector bosons in hadron collisions,JHEP05(2014) 090 [1402.7078]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [37]

    Caola, J.M

    F. Caola, J.M. Henn, K. Melnikov and V.A. Smirnov,Non-planar master integrals for the production of two off-shell vector bosons in collisions of massless partons,JHEP09(2014) 043 [1404.5590]

    2014 arXiv

  23. [38]

    Caola, J.M

    F. Caola, J.M. Henn, K. Melnikov, A.V. Smirnov and V.A. Smirnov,Two-loop helicity amplitudes for the production of two off-shell electroweak bosons in quark-antiquark collisions,JHEP11(2014) 041 [1408.6409]

    2014 arXiv

  24. [39]

    Caola, J.M

    F. Caola, J.M. Henn, K. Melnikov, A.V. Smirnov and V.A. Smirnov,Two-loop helicity amplitudes for the production of two off-shell electroweak bosons in gluon fusion,JHEP06 (2015) 129 [1503.08759]

    2015 arXiv

  25. [40]

    Gehrmann, A

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,The two-loop helicity amplitudes for qq′ →V 1V2 →4leptons,JHEP09(2015) 128 [1503.04812]

    2015 arXiv

  26. [41]

    von Manteuffel and L

    A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,The two-loop helicity amplitudes for gg→V 1V2 →4 leptons,JHEP06(2015) 197 [1503.08835]

    2015 arXiv

  27. [42]

    Grazzini, S

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, D. Rathlev and M. Wiesemann,Transverse-momentum resummation for vector-boson pair production at NNLL+NNLO,JHEP08(2015) 154 [1507.02565]

    2015 arXiv

  28. [43]

    Grazzini, S

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit and D. Rathlev,ZZ production at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD,Phys. Lett. B750(2015) 407 [1507.06257]

    2015 arXiv

  29. [44]

    Caola, K

    F. Caola, K. Melnikov, R. Röntsch and L. Tancredi,QCD corrections to ZZ production in gluon fusion at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 094028 [1509.06734]

    2015 arXiv

  30. [45]

    Grazzini, S

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, D. Rathlev and M. Wiesemann,W±Zproduction at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD,Phys. Lett. B761(2016) 179 [1604.08576]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [46]

    Campbell, R.K

    J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, M. Czakon and S. Kirchner,Two loop correction to interference ingg→ZZ,JHEP08(2016) 011 [1605.01380]

    2016 arXiv

  32. [47]

    Grazzini, S

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, S. Pozzorini, D. Rathlev and M. Wiesemann,W+W − production at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD,JHEP08(2016) 140 [1605.02716]

    2016 arXiv

  33. [48]

    Grazzini, S

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, D. Rathlev and M. Wiesemann,W±Zproduction at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD,JHEP05(2017) 139 [1703.09065]

    2017 arXiv

  34. [49]

    Heinrich, S

    G. Heinrich, S. Jahn, S.P. Jones, M. Kerner and J. Pires,NNLO predictions for Z-boson pair production at the LHC,JHEP03(2018) 142 [1710.06294]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [50]

    E. Re, M. Wiesemann and G. Zanderighi,NNLOPS accurate predictions forW+W − production,JHEP12(2018) 121 [1805.09857]

    2018 arXiv

  36. [51]

    Kallweit and M

    S. Kallweit and M. Wiesemann,ZZproduction at the LHC: NNLO predictions for2ℓ2νand 4ℓsignatures,Phys. Lett. B786(2018) 382 [1806.05941]

    2018 arXiv

  37. [52]

    Grazzini, S

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, M. Wiesemann and J.Y. Yook,ZZproduction at the LHC: NLO QCD corrections to the loop-induced gluon fusion channel,JHEP03(2019) 070 [1811.09593]. – 19 –

    2019 arXiv

  38. [53]

    Grazzini, S

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, J.M. Lindert, S. Pozzorini and M. Wiesemann,NNLO QCD + NLO EW with Matrix+OpenLoops: precise predictions for vector-boson pair production, JHEP02(2020) 087 [1912.00068]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [54]

    Kallweit, E

    S. Kallweit, E. Re, L. Rottoli and M. Wiesemann,Accurate single- and double-differential resummation of colour-singlet processes with MATRIX+RADISH:W+W − production at the LHC,JHEP12(2020) 147 [2004.07720]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [55]

    Poncelet and A

    R. Poncelet and A. Popescu,NNLO QCD study of polarisedW+W − production at the LHC,JHEP07(2021) 023 [2102.13583]

    2021 arXiv

  41. [56]

    Lombardi, M

    D. Lombardi, M. Wiesemann and G. Zanderighi,W+W − production at NNLO+PS with MINNLOP S,JHEP11(2021) 230 [2103.12077]

    2021 arXiv

  42. [57]

    Degrassi, R

    G. Degrassi, R. Gröber and M. Vitti,Virtual QCD corrections to gg→ZZ: top-quark loops from a transverse-momentum expansion,JHEP07(2024) 244 [2404.15113]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [58]

    Pelliccioli and R

    G. Pelliccioli and R. Poncelet,Precise predictions for joint polarisation fractions in WZ production at the LHC,2510.25898

  44. [59]

    Abreu, D

    S. Abreu, D. Chicherin, V. Sotnikov and S. Zoia,Two-Loop Five-Point Two-Mass Planar Integrals and Double Lagrangian Insertions in a Wilson Loop,2408.05201

    arXiv

  45. [60]

    Kotikov,Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,Phys

    A.V. Kotikov,Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation,Phys. Lett. B254(1991) 158

    1991

  46. [61]

    Bern, L.J

    Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon and D.A. Kosower,Dimensionally regulated pentagon integrals,Nucl. Phys. B412(1994) 751 [hep-ph/9306240]

    1994 arXiv

  47. [62]

    Gehrmann and E

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi,Differential equations for two loop four point functions, Nucl. Phys. B580(2000) 485 [hep-ph/9912329]

    2000 arXiv

  48. [63]

    Tkachov,A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,Phys

    F.V. Tkachov,A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,Phys. Lett. B100(1981) 65

    1981

  49. [64]

    Chetyrkin and F.V

    K.G. Chetyrkin and F.V. Tkachov,Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops,Nucl. Phys. B192(1981) 159

    1981

  50. [65]

    Laporta,High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,Int

    S. Laporta,High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15(2000) 5087 [hep-ph/0102033]

    2000 arXiv

  51. [66]

    von Manteuffel and R.M

    A. von Manteuffel and R.M. Schabinger,A novel approach to integration by parts reduction, Phys. Lett. B744(2015) 101 [1406.4513]

    2015 arXiv

  52. [67]

    Peraro,Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction,JHEP12(2016) 030 [1608.01902]

    T. Peraro,Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction,JHEP12(2016) 030 [1608.01902]

    2016 arXiv

  53. [68]

    Peraro,FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs,JHEP07(2019) 031 [1905.08019]

    T. Peraro,FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs,JHEP07(2019) 031 [1905.08019]

    2019 arXiv

  54. [69]

    Henn,Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,Phys

    J.M. Henn,Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple,Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(2013) 251601 [1304.1806]

    2013 arXiv

  55. [70]

    Pozzorini and E

    S. Pozzorini and E. Remiddi,Precise numerical evaluation of the two loop sunrise graph master integrals in the equal mass case,Comput. Phys. Commun.175(2006) 381 [hep-ph/0505041]

    2006 arXiv

  56. [71]

    Moriello,Generalised power series expansions for the elliptic planar families of Higgs + jet production at two loops,JHEP01(2020) 150 [1907.13234]

    F. Moriello,Generalised power series expansions for the elliptic planar families of Higgs + jet production at two loops,JHEP01(2020) 150 [1907.13234]. – 20 –

    2020 arXiv

  57. [72]

    Hidding,DiffExp, a Mathematica package for computing Feynman integrals in terms of one-dimensional series expansions,Comput

    M. Hidding,DiffExp, a Mathematica package for computing Feynman integrals in terms of one-dimensional series expansions,Comput. Phys. Commun.269(2021) 108125 [2006.05510]

    2021 arXiv

  58. [73]

    Liu and Y.-Q

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,AMFlow: A Mathematica package for Feynman integrals computation via auxiliary mass flow,Comput. Phys. Commun.283(2023) 108565 [2201.11669]

    2023 arXiv

  59. [74]

    Armadillo, R

    T. Armadillo, R. Bonciani, S. Devoto, N. Rana and A. Vicini,Evaluation of Feynman integrals with arbitrary complex masses via series expansions,Comput. Phys. Commun.282 (2023) 108545 [2205.03345]

    2023 arXiv

  60. [75]

    Prisco, J

    R.M. Prisco, J. Ronca and F. Tramontano,LINE: Loop Integrals Numerical Evaluation, JHEP07(2025) 219 [2501.01943]

    2025 arXiv

  61. [76]

    Liu, Y.-Q

    X. Liu, Y.-Q. Ma and C.-Y. Wang,A Systematic and Efficient Method to Compute Multi-loop Master Integrals,Phys. Lett. B779(2018) 353 [1711.09572]

    2018 arXiv

  62. [77]

    Liu and Y.-Q

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,Multiloop corrections for collider processes using auxiliary mass flow, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) L051503 [2107.01864]

    2022 arXiv

  63. [78]

    Chen,Iterated path integrals,Bull

    K.-T. Chen,Iterated path integrals,Bull. Am. Math. Soc.83(1977) 831

    1977

  64. [79]

    Goncharov,Galois symmetries of fundamental groupoids and noncommutative geometry,Duke Math

    A.B. Goncharov,Galois symmetries of fundamental groupoids and noncommutative geometry,Duke Math. J.128(2005) 209 [math/0208144]

    2005 arXiv

  65. [80]

    Goncharov,A simple construction of Grassmannian polylogarithms,0908.2238

    A.B. Goncharov,A simple construction of Grassmannian polylogarithms,0908.2238

    arXiv

  66. [81]

    Drummond, J

    J. Drummond, J. Foster and Ö. Gürdoğan,Cluster Adjacency Properties of Scattering Amplitudes inN= 4Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 161601 [1710.10953]

    2018 arXiv

  67. [82]

    Drummond, J

    J. Drummond, J. Foster and Ö. Gürdoğan,Cluster adjacency beyond MHV,JHEP03 (2019) 086 [1810.08149]

    2019 arXiv

  68. [83]

    Chicherin, J.M

    D. Chicherin, J.M. Henn and G. Papathanasiou,Cluster algebras for Feynman integrals, Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 091603 [2012.12285]

    2021 arXiv

  69. [84]

    Aliaj and G

    R. Aliaj and G. Papathanasiou,An Exceptional Cluster Algebra for Higgs plus Jet Production,2408.14544

    arXiv

  70. [85]

    Steinmann,Über den Zusammenhang zwischen den Wightmanfunktionen und den retardierten Kommutatoren,Helv

    O. Steinmann,Über den Zusammenhang zwischen den Wightmanfunktionen und den retardierten Kommutatoren,Helv. Physica Acta33(1960) 257

    1960

  71. [86]

    Steinmann,Über den Zusammenhang zwischen den Wightmanfunktionen und den retardierten Kommutatoren

    O. Steinmann,Über den Zusammenhang zwischen den Wightmanfunktionen und den retardierten Kommutatoren. II,Helv. Physica Acta33(1960) 347

    1960

  72. [87]

    Cahill and H.P

    K.E. Cahill and H.P. Stapp,Generalized optical theorems and steinmann relations,Phys. Rev. D8(1973) 2714

    1973

  73. [88]

    Byers and C.N

    N. Byers and C.N. Yang,Physical Regions in Invariant Variables for n Particles and the Phase-Space Volume Element,Rev. Mod. Phys.36(1964) 595

    1964

  74. [89]

    Argeri, S

    M. Argeri, S. Di Vita, P. Mastrolia, E. Mirabella, J. Schlenk, U. Schubert et al.,Magnus and Dyson Series for Master Integrals,JHEP03(2014) 082 [1401.2979]

    2014 arXiv

  75. [90]

    Wasser,Analytic properties of Feynman integrals for scattering amplitudes, 2018

    P. Wasser,Analytic properties of Feynman integrals for scattering amplitudes, 2018

    2018

  76. [91]

    Arkani-Hamed, J.L

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J.L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo and J. Trnka,Local Integrals for Planar Scattering Amplitudes,JHEP06(2012) 125 [1012.6032]. – 21 –

    2012 arXiv

  77. [92]

    Wasser,Scattering Amplitudes and Logarithmic Differential Forms, Ph.D

    P. Wasser,Scattering Amplitudes and Logarithmic Differential Forms, Ph.D. thesis, Mainz U., Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 2022. 10.25358/openscience-6801

    2022 doi

  78. [93]

    Papadopoulos,Simplified differential equations approach for Master Integrals,JHEP 07(2014) 088 [1401.6057]

    C.G. Papadopoulos,Simplified differential equations approach for Master Integrals,JHEP 07(2014) 088 [1401.6057]

    2014 arXiv

  79. [94]

    Canko, F

    D.D. Canko, F. Gasparotto, L. Mattiazzi, C.G. Papadopoulos and N. Syrrakos,N3LO calculations for2→2processes using simplified differential equations,SciPost Phys. Proc. 7(2022) 028 [2110.08110]

    2022 arXiv

  80. [95]

    Baikov,Explicit solutions of the multiloop integral recurrence relations and its application,Nucl

    P.A. Baikov,Explicit solutions of the multiloop integral recurrence relations and its application,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A389(1997) 347 [hep-ph/9611449]

    1997 arXiv

  81. [96]

    Baikov,Explicit solutions of the three loop vacuum integral recurrence relations,Phys

    P.A. Baikov,Explicit solutions of the three loop vacuum integral recurrence relations,Phys. Lett. B385(1996) 404 [hep-ph/9603267]

    1996 arXiv

  82. [97]

    Frellesvig and C.G

    H. Frellesvig and C.G. Papadopoulos,Cuts of Feynman Integrals in Baikov representation, JHEP04(2017) 083 [1701.07356]

    2017 arXiv

  83. [98]

    Ancillary files for the article

    D. Canko and M. Pozzoli, “Ancillary files for the article "All planar three-loop Feynman integrals for the production of two vector bosons at hadron colliders".” https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17727482, 2 December 2025

    2025 doi

  84. [99]

    Jiang, J

    X. Jiang, J. Liu, X. Xu and L.L. Yang,Symbol letters of Feynman integrals from Gram determinants,2401.07632

    arXiv

  85. [100]

    Correia, M

    M. Correia, M. Giroux and S. Mizera,SOFIA: Singularities of Feynman Integrals Automatized,2503.16601

  86. [101]

    Matijašić,Singularity structure of Feynman integrals with applications to six-particle scattering processes, Ph.D

    A. Matijašić,Singularity structure of Feynman integrals with applications to six-particle scattering processes, Ph.D. thesis, Munich U, 2024. 10.5282/edoc.34154

    2024 doi

  87. [102]

    Heller, A

    M. Heller, A. von Manteuffel and R.M. Schabinger,Multiple polylogarithms with algebraic arguments and the two-loop EW-QCD Drell-Yan master integrals,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 016025 [1907.00491]

    2020 arXiv

  88. [103]

    Zoia,Modern Analytic Methods for Computing Scattering Amplitudes: With Application to Two-Loop Five-Particle Processes, Ph.D

    S. Zoia,Modern Analytic Methods for Computing Scattering Amplitudes: With Application to Two-Loop Five-Particle Processes, Ph.D. thesis, Munich U, 2022. 10.1007/978-3-031-01945-6

    2022 doi

  89. [104]

    Goncharov,Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes,Math

    A.B. Goncharov,Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes,Math. Res. Lett.5(1998) 497 [1105.2076]

    1998 arXiv

  90. [105]

    Goncharov, M

    A.B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu and A. Volovich,Classical Polylogarithms for Amplitudes and Wilson Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 151605 [1006.5703]

    2010 arXiv

  91. [106]

    Papathanasiou, S

    G. Papathanasiou, S. Weinzierl, K. Wu and Y. Zhang,Rationalisation of multiple square roots in Feynman integrals,JHEP05(2025) 078 [2501.07490]

    2025 arXiv

  92. [107]

    Boughezal, M

    R. Boughezal, M. Czakon and T. Schutzmeier,NNLO fermionic corrections to the charm quark mass dependent matrix elements in¯B→X sγ,JHEP09(2007) 072 [0707.3090]

    2007 arXiv

  93. [108]

    Czakon,Tops from Light Quarks: Full Mass Dependence at Two-Loops in QCD,Phys

    M. Czakon,Tops from Light Quarks: Full Mass Dependence at Two-Loops in QCD,Phys. Lett. B664(2008) 307 [0803.1400]

    2008 arXiv

  94. [109]

    Czakon and M

    M.L. Czakon and M. Niggetiedt,Exact quark-mass dependence of the Higgs-gluon form factor at three loops in QCD,JHEP05(2020) 149 [2001.03008]. – 22 –

    2020 arXiv

  95. [110]

    Czakon, R.V

    M. Czakon, R.V. Harlander, J. Klappert and M. Niggetiedt,Exact Top-Quark Mass Dependence in Hadronic Higgs Production,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 162002 [2105.04436]

    2021 arXiv

  96. [111]

    Calisto, R

    F. Calisto, R. Moodie and S. Zoia,Learning Feynman integrals from differential equations with neural networks,JHEP07(2024) 124 [2312.02067]

    2024 arXiv

  97. [112]

    Petit Rosàs and W.J

    P. Petit Rosàs and W.J. Torres Bobadilla,Fast evaluation of Feynman integrals for Monte Carlo generators,JHEP09(2025) 210 [2507.12548]

    2025 arXiv

  98. [113]

    Badger, M

    S. Badger, M. Becchetti, C. Brancaccio, M. Czakon, H.B. Hartanto, R. Poncelet et al., Double virtual QCD corrections tot¯t+jet production at the LHC,2511.11424

    arXiv

  99. [114]

    Gehrmann, J

    T. Gehrmann, J. Henn and N. Lo Presti,Analytic form of the two-loop planar five-gluon all-plus-helicity amplitude in QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 062001 [1511.05409]

    2016 arXiv

  100. [115]

    Gehrmann, J.M

    T. Gehrmann, J.M. Henn and N.A. Lo Presti,Pentagon functions for massless planar scattering amplitudes,JHEP10(2018) 103 [1807.09812]

    2018 arXiv

  101. [116]

    Chicherin and V

    D. Chicherin and V. Sotnikov,Pentagon Functions for Scattering of Five Massless Particles,JHEP20(2020) 167 [2009.07803]

    2020 arXiv

  102. [117]

    Chicherin, V

    D. Chicherin, V. Sotnikov and S. Zoia,Pentagon functions for one-mass planar scattering amplitudes,JHEP01(2022) 096 [2110.10111]

    2022 arXiv

  103. [118]

    Abreu, D

    S. Abreu, D. Chicherin, H. Ita, B. Page, V. Sotnikov, W. Tschernow et al.,All Two-Loop Feynman Integrals for Five-Point One-Mass Scattering,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 141601 [2306.15431]

    2024 arXiv

  104. [119]

    Becchetti, M

    M. Becchetti, M. Delto, S. Ditsch, P.A. Kreer, M. Pozzoli and L. Tancredi,One-Loop QCD Corrections to¯ud→t ¯tWatO(ε 2),2502.14952

  105. [120]

    Ma, C.-H

    Y.-Q. Ma, C.-H. Qin, A. Tan and K. Yan,Reduction ofϵ-expanded Feynman integrals, 2504.16766

    arXiv

  106. [121]

    Ancillary files for the article

    D. Canko and M. Pozzoli, “Ancillary files for the article "A first computation of three-loop master integrals for the production of two off-shell vector bosons with different masses".” https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14284044, 9 December 2024. – 23 –

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.