Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 53 references

Topological Jackiw-Rebbi States in Photonic Van der Waals Heterostructures

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper reports Jackiw-Rebbi topological interface states in stacked WS2 photonic gratings, localised at the boundary, with 10 meV linewidth and directional enhancement of coupled WSe2 emission up to 22 times.

desk verdict Compact WS2 inverted gratings yield a credible photonic JR state with active emitter coupling; near-field normalization and missing robustness test are the main caveats. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03985 v1 pith:OI5JFSKM submitted 2025-06-04 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hall

Sam A. Randerson , Paul Bouteyre , Xuerong Hu , Oscar J. Palma-Chaundler , Alexander J. Knight , Helgi Sigur{ḥsson , Casey K. Cheung , Yue Wang
show 4 more authors
Kenji Watanabe Takashi Taniguchi Roman Gorbachev Alexander I. Tartakovskii
This is my paper
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mes-hall
keywords Jackiw-RebbistatestopologicalphotonicsvanderWaalsheterostructuresWS2gratingsboundinthecontinuumnear-fieldopticalmicroscopyphotoluminescenceenhancementphotoniccrystals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a one-dimensional photonic crystal made from stacked layers of quasi-bulk WS2 can host a Jackiw-Rebbi interface state between two gratings with opposite topological phase, working at near-infrared wavelengths around 750 nm. It supports this with far-field angle-resolved reflectance showing a mid-gap mode of 10 meV linewidth and 8.0 degrees angular bandwidth, and with near-field scanning microscopy showing the mode confined to the grating interface. It then embeds a monolayer WSe2 emitter in the stack and reports directional photoluminescence enhancement up to 22 times that of the uncoupled monolayer. If correct, this shows that van der Waals materials can be stacked into compact topological photonic devices that both localise and directionally emit light.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is a non-Hermitian Dirac-like Hamiltonian for two counter-propagating guided modes of a 1D grating, with diffractive coupling $Je^{i\varphi}$ and radiative loss $\gamma$. Mirror symmetry restricts $\varphi$ to $0$ or $\pi$; changing the filling factor flips this phase, which inverts the band structure and changes the Zak phase from 0 to $\pi$. After a unitary transform the Hamiltonian becomes a 1D Dirac equation whose mass term $m(x)$ changes sign at the grating interface, and the Jackiw-Rebbi solution localises exactly there. The experimental enabler is the inverted grating, a design where a top WS2 slab reduces the effective index contrast so the gap can actually close and reopen, something a bare high-index WS2 grating cannot do.

What would settle it

Re-measure the s-SNOM signal at 736 nm without the separate median line-leveling on the two grating sides; if the interface enhancement disappears in the raw scattering amplitude, the spatial-confinement claim collapses. A complementary check is to fabricate the same double-grating interface between two topologically identical gratings and show that no mid-gap interface peak appears, or to scale the grating period and confirm the interface peak tracks the predicted JR energy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a photonic Jackiw-Rebbi state appears at the interface between two topologically distinct gratings etched into quasi-bulk WS2, and that this state can be seen in far-field reflectance, near-field scattering, and emitter photoluminescence. A top WS2 slab on the grating lowers the effective refractive-index contrast enough that the filling factor closes and reopens the photonic gap, causing band inversion; the boundary between a high-filling-factor and a low-filling-factor grating then carries a mid-gap mode at about 1.68 eV. The mode has a 10 meV linewidth and an 8.0 degree angular bandwidth perpendicular to the grooves, is spatially localised at the interface in s-SNOM scans, and couples to an embedded hBN-encapsulated WSe2 monolayer to give a directional enhancement of up to 22 times over the uncoupled emitter.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the near-field scattering peak at the grating interface at 736 nm is the Jackiw-Rebbi mode's local field and not an artificial contrast step created by normalising the signal separately on the two sides of the boundary.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Topological photonic interface states can be made in sub-100 nm van der Waals stacks, removing the need for micrometre-thick gratings.
  • A monolayer emitter placed at the interface gains a directional emission channel with up to 22-fold enhancement into a narrow angular range.
  • The same transfer-stamping fabrication can place additional van der Waals layers on pre-etched gratings without lattice matching or chemical bonding.
  • The JR state's narrow linewidth and mid-gap position make the structure work as a compact directional filter or narrow-linewidth light source.
  • The measured real-space, k-space, and energy localisation together establish the state as a genuine interface-bound mode accessible to near-field probes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Moving the emitting monolayer from the grating layer into the top slab, where the simulated JR field is strongest, could push the directional enhancement above 22; this is a natural next experiment.
  • The inverted-grating design should transfer to other high-index van der Waals materials and to other wavelengths by rescaling period and thickness, with the same reflectance-contrast signature as a check.
  • If raw s-SNOM data, before the separate line-leveling, still show the interface peak, the platform becomes a general near-field testbed for topological phase boundaries in layered photonic crystals.
  • The strong directivity difference between the kx and ky directions suggests the same structure could act as a one-dimensional free-space collimator for integrated van der Waals light sources, a use the paper does not demonstrate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the design, fabrication, and characterization of one-dimensional topological photonic gratings made from multilayer WS2 on gold. The authors use an effective non-Hermitian Dirac Hamiltonian to argue that two grating regions with different filling factors realize opposite topological phases through band inversion of a symmetry-protected BIC, and that their interface hosts a Jackiw-Rebbi mid-gap state. Far-field angle-resolved reflectance contrast shows a mid-gap mode at the interface with a 10 meV linewidth and an 8.0° angular bandwidth. Near-field s-SNOM at 736 nm shows an interface-localized scattering peak that disappears at other wavelengths, in agreement with FDTD simulations. Finally, in a five-layer heterostructure with an embedded hBN-encapsulated WSe2 monolayer, angle-resolved PL measurements show directional enhancement up to 22× relative to an unpatterned reference region.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a significant advance: it brings topological interface states to compact (<100 nm) van der Waals photonic devices, demonstrates active emitter coupling to a JR state, and provides a transfer-stack fabrication route. The theoretical framework is standard and the simulations use independently measured optical constants, so the JR state energy is not an ad hoc fitted parameter. The far-field band-inversion evidence is supported by a second sample (Supp. Note 3), and the PL analysis is documented in detail. The main risk is the near-field normalization procedure, which is load-bearing for the real-space localization claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V and Supplementary Note 5] The s-SNOM images in Fig. 5(d–e) are median line-leveled separately on each side of the grating interface to suppress the different intrinsic material responses of the high- and low-FF gratings. This procedure subtracts a different baseline from the two halves of each scan line; if the raw baseline varies smoothly across the interface (e.g., due to the different effective permittivity of the two gratings), the leveling itself creates an artificial step at x=0. Because the intrinsic material response of the two gratings is wavelength-dependent, the wavelength scan in Fig. 5(e) cannot by itself exclude a normalization artifact. The authors should show the raw, un-leveled s-SNOM maps or a control region processed with the same per-side leveling, and quantify the magnitude of the leveling step relative to the claimed interface enhancement. This is needed to support the abstract's claim of spatial confinement.
  2. [Section VI and Supplementary Note 6] The 22× directional enhancement factor in Fig. 6(e) is computed using a reference PL signal collected without the variable aperture, and Supplementary Note 6 states that this reference contains weak grating-mode dispersion (Fig. S5(f)). If the no-aperture reference includes any grating-coupled emission within the chosen integration region, the denominator is not a clean uncoupled-monolayer baseline and the enhancement factor is inflated. The authors should either recompute the enhancement using the aperture-based reference (Fig. S5(d)) or quantitatively show that the weak dispersion in the no-aperture reference contributes negligibly to the integrated signal.
  3. [Section IV and Figure 4(a)] The central identification of the interface state as topologically protected is inferred from the observed band inversion (BIC on the upper vs lower branch) through the effective Hamiltonian mapping of Refs. [11,33], rather than from a direct calculation of the Zak phase or surface impedance for the actual fabricated parameters. The authors should state explicitly whether the topological invariant is computed for the fabricated structure (a1=279 nm, F1=0.81; a2=319 nm, F2=0.41) or only for the idealized Hamiltonian with φ=0/π. If only the latter, this limitation should be acknowledged, or an independent check (e.g., a direct Zak-phase calculation from the RCWA modes) should be provided to support the term 'topologically protected JR state'.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (5)] The notation |m(x)·x| is dimensionally inconsistent because m is a scalar mass parameter, not a vector; this should be written as |m(x)| |x| or m0 |x| in the exponential.
  2. [Section IV, Fig. 4(b) caption] The wavevector normalization for the interface region uses the average of the two grating periods; this should be stated explicitly in the main text rather than only in the figure caption.
  3. [Section VI and Supp. Note 6] The label 'uncoupled monolayer' for the PL reference is misleading, since the reference consists of an hBN-encapsulated monolayer between two unpatterned WS2 slabs; 'unpatterned' or 'ungrated' would be clearer.
  4. [Section V, s-SNOM description] The text states that 'complete background removal' was obtained, but the data are still median line-leveled; the distinction between interferometric background removal and the per-side leveling procedure should be clarified to avoid confusion.
  5. [Fig. 5(d)] The s-SNOM image lacks a scale bar; adding one would help the reader judge the spatial extent of the interface-localized peak relative to the grating periods.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the JR interface state is predicted by full-wave FDTD from independently measured optical constants and then confirmed by far-field and near-field measurements, with only a non-circular s-SNOM normalization caveat.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The theoretical model (Eq. 1) is a non-Hermitian Dirac Hamiltonian cited to prior work [11,33,34]; although Ref. [33] shares an author, it is not used to assume the target JR state, and the same Hamiltonian form is available from independent sources. The single-grating RCWA simulations use independently measured optical constants, and the band inversion is predicted as filling factor is tuned rather than fitted to the measured JR energy. The decisive step is the double-grating FDTD simulation (Fig. 2e), which is a full-wave Maxwell solver with no topological input; the appearance of a mid-gap interface mode in that simulation is a genuine prediction, not a restatement of the Hamiltonian. The experimental far-field reflectance (Fig. 4) then shows a mid-gap feature only at the interface, consistent with the prediction. The near-field s-SNOM evidence is accompanied by an explicitly acknowledged data-processing caveat: the paper states that the images were 'median line leveled separately either side of the grating interface' (Section V) and that 'the total measured signal will be a combination of the intrinsic material properties of the sample, and the effect of the tip’s interaction with locally confined electric fields' (Supplementary Note 5). This per-side normalization could in principle create an artificial step at the interface, but that is an evidence-quality limitation, not a circularity: the localization claim is additionally supported by a wavelength scan matching the FDTD profile and by far-field measurements. The self-citations present (Refs. 23,24,31,33,40) are background, supplementary, or ancillary; none is load-bearing as a uniqueness argument or as the sole source of the central claim. Accordingly, no step reduces by construction to its own input, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim depends on the effective coupled-mode Hamiltonian (Eq. 1), whose parameters (J, gamma, v, phi) are not independently measured but are standard grating-coupling quantities. The design relies on hand-chosen geometric parameters (period, filling factor, top-slab thickness) that are necessary to close and reopen the band gap. No new particles or forces are introduced. The main unproved inputs are the applicability of the Dirac model to this high-index thin grating, the validity of the literature optical constants, and the bulk-boundary correspondence for the photonic modes.

free parameters (4)
  • Top slab thickness tslab = 41 nm (passive) / 32 nm (active)
    Chosen by simulation to reduce effective index contrast and permit band inversion; without it the gap cannot close (Supp. Note 2).
  • Grating periods a1, a2 = 279 nm, 319 nm (passive); 272 nm, 356 nm (supplement)
    Tuned to align the mid-gap energies of the two topological regimes.
  • Filling factors F1, F2 = 0.81, 0.41 (passive); 0.84, 0.24 (supplement)
    Chosen to place the two gratings on opposite sides of the band-inversion transition.
  • Grating thickness tgr = 47 nm (passive); 69 nm (active)
    Etched height, set by the exfoliated flake thickness and etch process, chosen to match the inverted-grating design.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The photonic modes near the Gamma point are described by the non-Hermitian Dirac Hamiltonian of Eq. (1) with parameters J, gamma, v, phi.
    Used to derive the band structure and the JR state; the validity for a sub-100 nm high-index grating is assumed from earlier coupled-mode theory (Refs 33,34).
  • standard math Mirror symmetry of the grating implies u(x)=u(-x) and thus Fourier coefficients are real, enforcing phi in {0,pi} and guaranteeing a symmetry-protected BIC.
    Standard Fourier analysis of an even periodic potential, Section II.A and Supp. Note 1.
  • domain assumption The Zak phase and bulk-boundary correspondence apply to the photonic bands, so a pi-flip in phi corresponds to a topological phase transition with a midgap JR state.
    Lifted directly from the SSH/Jackiw-Rebbi literature; the paper does not derive the invariant for the photonic system from first principles.
  • domain assumption The refractive index data for WS2 from Ref. [25] is accurate for the exfoliated flakes used here.
    All RCWA simulations of band positions and BIC energies rely on these previously published optical constants.
  • domain assumption The hBN encapsulation layers and the WSe2 monolayer do not significantly perturb the grating mode structure, aside from a small redshift of the JR state.
    The active heterostructure simulations and the interpretation of PL coupling assume the emitter is a weak perturbation; the paper notes a redshift but does not model it quantitatively.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological Jackiw-Rebbi States in Photonic Van der Waals Heterostructures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OI5JFSKM

@misc{pith2026250603985,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological Jackiw-Rebbi States in Photonic Van der Waals Heterostructures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OI5JFSKM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03985}
}
abstract

Topological phenomena, first studied in solid state physics, have seen increased interest for applications in nanophotonics owing to highly controllable light confinement with inherent robustness to defects. Photonic crystals can be designed to host topologically protected interface states for directional light transport, localization and robust lasing via tuning of the bulk topological invariant. At the same time, van der Waals (vdW) materials, in both their monolayer and quasi-bulk forms, are emerging as exciting additions to the field of nanophotonics, with a range of unique optoelectronic properties and intrinsic adherence to any type of host material, allowing fabrication of complex multi-layer structures. We present here a 1D topological photonic platform made from stacked nanostructured and planar layers of quasi-bulk WS$_2$ to achieve Jackiw-Rebbi (JR) interface states between two topologically distinct gratings in the near-infrared range around 750 nm. Such states are measured in the far-field with angle-resolved reflectance contrast measurements, exhibiting linewidth of 10 meV and highly directional emission with an angular bandwidth of 8.0$^\circ$. Subsequent local mapping of the structure via sub-wavelength resolution scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM) reveals strong spatial confinement of the JR state to the grating interface region. Finally, we couple in the JR state the photoluminescence of monolayer WSe$_2$ incorporated in a five-layer vdW grating heterostructure, giving rise to directional enhancement of the excitonic emission of up to 22 times that of uncoupled monolayer, thus demonstrating the potential of the topological interface states for highly directional light emission in addition to light scattering.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03985 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) depicts the simulated electric field con￾finement in a cross-sectional slice through the middle of the double gratings as calculated via FDTD. To emulate an s-SNOM measurement, the incident excitation was a p-polarized plane wave travelling at 60° to the substrate …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (2) The eigenvectors are derived in Supplementary Note 1

    describe the dispersion of the guided photons at low momenta, corresponding to the angle-resolved reflectance simulation (see Methods) shown in Figure 1 (c) using the Rigorous Coupled-Wave Analysis (RCW A) technique, ω ± (kx) = −iγ ± √ (vkx)2 +J 2 −γ 2 − 2iJγ cos (φ). (2) The eigenvectors are derived in Supplementary Note 1. Here, ω ± refer to the upper ( ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (4) Here, px = ℏkx, c = v and m = ℏ(J cos (φ) −iγ)/v 2

    can be transformed into a spinless one-dimensional non- Hermitian Dirac equation with a mass term m through the unitary transformation ˆU = (ˆσ x + ˆσ z)/ √ 2, ˆU † ˆH ˆU = ˆHDir =cˆσ x ˆpx − ˆσ zmc2 −iγ. (4) Here, px = ℏkx, c = v and m = ℏ(J cos (φ) −iγ)/v 2. It has been known for some time in relativistic quantum field theory that the 1D Dirac equation h...

    work page

  3. [3]

    68 eV ( 735-738 nm), which agrees perfectly with our simulations from Figure 5 (b). Importantly, this excita- tion regime means a component of the incident electric field lies parallel to the grooves as shown by the blue dou- ble arrow in Figure 5 (c), which is required to excite the TE-polarised grating modes and thus the JR interface state. Following car...

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    A lens placed at its focal length from the back fo- cal plane of the objective was used to image the Fourier plane

    7. A lens placed at its focal length from the back fo- cal plane of the objective was used to image the Fourier plane. A variable rectangular aperture was placed at the real-space plane after the first lens to selectively collect signal from specific spatial regions of each sample. A fur- ther two-lens telescope was used to enlarge the Fourier image, before...

    work page

  5. [5]

    K. V. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure con- stant based on quantized Hall resistance, Physical Review Letters 45, 494 (1980)

    work page 1980

  6. [6]

    Z. Wang, Y. Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states, Nature 461, 772 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    M. I. Shalaev, W. Walasik, A. Tsukernik, Y. Xu, and N. M. Litchinitser, Robust topologically protected trans- port in photonic crystals at telecommunication wave- lengths, Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 31 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Parappurath, F

    N. Parappurath, F. Alpeggiani, L. Kuipers, and E. Ver- hagen, Direct observation of topological edge states in sil- icon photonic crystals: spin, dispersion, and chiral rout- ing, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaw4137 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Arora, T

    S. Arora, T. Bauer, R. Barczyk, E. Verhagen, and L. Kuipers, Direct quantification of topological protec- tion in symmetry-protected photonic edge states at tele- com wavelengths, Light: Science & Applications 10, 9 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Orsini, H

    L. Orsini, H. Herzig Sheinfux, Y. Li, S. Lee, G. M. An- dolina, O. Scarlatella, M. Ceccanti, K. Soundarapandian, E. Janzen, J. H. Edgar, et al. , Deep subwavelength topo- logical edge state in a hyperbolic medium, Nature Nan- otechnology 19, 1485 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zil- berberg, and I. Carusotto, Topological photonics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Zak, Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids, Phys

    J. Zak, Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2747 (1989)

    1989

  5. [13]

    Jackiw and C

    R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, Solitons with fermion number ½, Phys. Rev. D 13, 3398 (1976)

    1976

  6. [14]

    A. J. Heeger, S. Kivelson, J. R. Schrieffer, and W. P. Su, Solitons in conducting polymers, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 781 (1988)

    1988

  7. [16]

    K. Y. Lee, S. Yoon, S. H. Song, and J. W. Yoon, Topo- logical beaming of light, Science Advances 8, eadd8349 (2022)

    2022

  8. [17]

    S.-C. An, Y. Lim, K. Y. Lee, D. Choi, S. Kim, S.-H. Gong, J. W. Yoon, and Y. C. Jun, Topological exciton polaritons in compact perovskite junction metasurfaces, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 2313840 (2024)

    2024

  9. [18]

    Wang, H.-C

    Y. Wang, H.-C. Nguyen, Z. Yuan, T. T. H. Do, V. Val- uckas, H. S. Nguyen, C. Dang, and S. T. Ha, Hybridiza- tion of non-hermitian topological interface modes, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17649 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Y. S. Choi, K. Y. Lee, S.-C. An, M. Jang, Y. Kim, S. Yoon, S. H. Shin, and J. W. Yoon, Topological beam- ing of light: proof-of-concept experiment, Light: Science & Applications 14, 121 (2025)

    2025

  11. [20]

    St-Jean, V

    P. St-Jean, V. Goblot, E. Galopin, A. Lemaître, T. Ozawa, L. Le Gratiet, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, and A. Amo, Lasing in topological edge states of a one-dimensional lat- tice, Nature Photonics 11, 651 (2017) . 13

    2017

  12. [21]

    A. A. Gorlach, D. V. Zhirihin, A. P. Slobozhanyuk, A. B. Khanikaev, and M. A. Gorlach, Photonic jackiw- rebbi states in all-dielectric structures controlled by bian- isotropy, Phys. Rev. B 99, 205122 (2019)

    2019

  13. [22]

    Y. Ota, R. Katsumi, K. Watanabe, S. Iwamoto, and Y. Arakawa, Topological photonic crystal nanocavity laser, Communications Physics 1, 86 (2018)

    2018

  14. [23]

    Q. H. Wang, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, A. Kis, J. N. Cole- man, and M. S. Strano, Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Na- ture Nanotechnology 7, 699 (2012)

    2012

  15. [24]

    K. F. Mak and J. Shan, Photonics and optoelectronics of 2D semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides, Na- ture Photonics 10, 216 (2016)

    2016

  16. [25]

    Splendiani, L

    A. Splendiani, L. Sun, Y. Zhang, T. Li, J. Kim, C.-Y. Chim, G. Galli, and F. Wang, Emerging photolumines- cence in monolayer MoS 2, Nano Letters 10, 1271 (2010)

    2010

  17. [26]

    K. F. Mak, C. Lee, J. Hone, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Atomically thin MoS 2: a new direct-gap semiconductor, Physical Review Letters 105, 136805 (2010)

    2010

  18. [27]

    P. G. Zotev, Y. Wang, D. Andres-Penares, T. Severs- Millard, S. Randerson, X. Hu, L. Sortino, C. Louca, M. Brotons-Gisbert, T. Huq, et al. , Van der Waals mate- rials for applications in nanophotonics, Laser & Photon- ics Reviews 17, 2200957 (2023)

    2023

  19. [28]

    S. A. Randerson, P. G. Zotev, X. Hu, A. J. Knight, Y. Wang, S. Nagarkar, D. Hensman, Y. Wang, and A. I. Tartakovskii, High q hybrid Mie–plasmonic resonances in van der Waals nanoantennas on gold substrate, ACS Nano 18, 16208 (2024)

    2024

  20. [29]

    Munkhbat, P

    B. Munkhbat, P. Wróbel, T. J. Antosiewicz, and T. O. Shegai, Optical constants of several multilayer transi- tion metal dichalcogenides measured by spectroscopic ellipsometry in the 300–1700 nm range: high index, anisotropy, and hyperbolicity, ACS Photonics 9, 2398 (2022)

    2022

  21. [30]

    M. Li, I. Sinev, F. Benimetskiy, T. Ivanova, E. Khes- tanova, S. Kiriushechkina, A. Vakulenko, S. Guddala, M. Skolnick, V. M. Menon, D. Krizhanovskii, A. Alù, A. Samusev, and A. B. Khanikaev, Experimental ob- servation of topological Z 2 exciton-polaritons in transi- tion meta...

    2021

  22. [31]

    Lundt, Ł

    N. Lundt, Ł. Dusanowski, E. Sedov, P. Stepanov, M. M. Glazov, S. Klembt, M. Klaas, J. Beierlein, Y. Qin, S. Tongay, M. Richard, A. V. Kavokin, S. Höfling, and C. Schneider, Optical valley hall effect for highly valley- coherent exciton-polaritons in an atomically thin semi- cond...

    2019

  23. [32]

    Munkhbat, A

    B. Munkhbat, A. B. Yankovich, D. G. Baranov, R. Verre, E. Olsson, and T. O. Shegai, Transition metal dichalco- genide metamaterials with atomic precision, Nature Communications 11, 4604 (2020)

    2020

  24. [33]

    Munkhbat, B

    B. Munkhbat, B. Küçüköz, D. G. Baranov, T. J. An- tosiewicz, and T. O. Shegai, Nanostructured transition metal dichalcogenide multilayers for advanced nanopho- tonics, Laser & Photonics Reviews 17, 2200057 (2023)

    2023

  25. [34]

    D. R. Danielsen, A. Lyksborg-Andersen, K. E. Nielsen, B. S. Jessen, T. J. Booth, M.-H. Doan, Y. Zhou, P. Bøg- gild, and L. Gammelgaard, Super-resolution nanolithog- raphy of two-dimensional materials by anisotropic etch- ing, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13, 41886 (2021)

    2021

  26. [35]

    Isoniemi, P

    T. Isoniemi, P. Bouteyre, X. Hu, F. Benimetskiy, Y. Wang, M. S. Skolnick, D. N. Krizhanovskii, and A. I. Tartakovskii, Realization of Z2 topological photonic in- sulators made from multilayer transition metal dichalco- genides, ACS nano 18, 32547 (2024)

    2024

  27. [36]

    Lee and R

    S.-G. Lee and R. Magnusson, Band flips and bound-state transitions in leaky-mode photonic lattices, Physical Re- view B 99, 045304 (2019)

    2019

  28. [37]

    Sigurðsson, H

    H. Sigurðsson, H. C. Nguyen, and H. S. Nguyen, Dirac exciton–polariton condensates in photonic crystal grat- ings, Nanophotonics 13, 3503 (2024)

    2024

  29. [38]

    L. Lu, Q. Le-Van, L. Ferrier, E. Drouard, C. Seassal, and H. S. Nguyen, Engineering a light–matter strong coupling regime in perovskite-based plasmonic metasur- face: quasi-bound state in the continuum and exceptional points, Photon. Res. 8, A91 (2020)

    2020

  30. [39]

    Friedrich and D

    H. Friedrich and D. Wintgen, Interfering resonances and bound states in the continuum, Phys. Rev. A 32, 3231 (1985)

    1985

  31. [41]

    H. M. Doeleman, F. Monticone, W. den Hollander, A. Alù, and A. F. Koenderink, Experimental observa- tion of a polarization vortex at an optical bound state in the continuum, Nature Photonics 12, 397–401 (2018)

    2018

  32. [42]

    Niemi and G

    A. Niemi and G. Semenoff, Fermion number fractioniza- tion in quantum field theory, Physics Reports 135, 99 (1986)

    1986

  33. [43]

    M. Xiao, Z. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Surface impedance and bulk band geometric phases in one-dimensional sys- tems, Physical Review X 4, 021017 (2014)

    2014

  34. [44]

    Bouteyre, D

    P. Bouteyre, D. X. Nguyen, G. Gachon, T. Benyat- tou, X. Letartre, P. Viktorovitch, S. Callard, L. Ferrier, and H. S. Nguyen, Non-hermitian topological invariant of photonic band structures undergoing inversion, arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.09884 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  35. [45]

    Miri and A

    M.-A. Miri and A. Alu, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science 363, eaar7709 (2019)

    2019

  36. [46]

    N. J. van Hoof, D. R. Abujetas, S. E. Ter Huurne, F. Verdelli, G. C. Timmermans, J. A. Sánchez-Gil, and J. G. Rivas, Unveiling the symmetry protection of bound states in the continuum with terahertz near-field imag- ing, ACS Photonics 8, 3010 (2021)

    2021

  37. [47]

    Y. Gao, J. Ge, S. Sun, and X. Shen, Dark modes gov- erned by translational-symmetry-protected bound states in the continuum in symmetric dimer lattices, Results in Physics 43, 106078 (2022)

    2022

  38. [48]

    Liu and S

    V. Liu and S. Fan, S 4 : a free electromagnetic solver for layered periodic structures, Computer Physics Commu- nications 183, 2233 (2012) . Supplementary Information for: Topological Jackiw-Rebbi States in Photonic Van der Waals Heterostructures Sam A. Randerson, 1, ∗ Paul Bo...

    2012

  39. [49]

    Sigurðsson, H

    H. Sigurðsson, H. C. Nguyen, and H. S. Nguyen, Dirac exciton–polariton condensates in photonic crystal gratings, Nanopho- tonics 13, 3503 (2024)

    2024

  40. [50]

    L. Lu, Q. Le-Van, L. Ferrier, E. Drouard, C. Seassal, and H. S. Nguyen, Engineering a light–matter strong coupling regime in perovskite-based plasmonic metasurface: quasi-bound state in the continuum and exceptional points, Photon. Res. 8, A91 (2020)

    2020

  41. [51]

    K. Y. Lee, K. W. Yoo, Y. Choi, G. Kim, S. Cheon, J. W. Yoon, and S. H. Song, Topological guided-mode resonances at non-Hermitian nanophotonic interfaces, Nanophotonics 10, 1853 (2021)

    2021

  42. [52]

    S. I. Azzam and A. V. Kildishev, Photonic bound states in the continuum: From basics to applications, Advanced Optical Materials 9, 2001469 (2021)

    2021

  43. [53]

    H. M. Doeleman, F. Monticone, W. den Hollander, A. Alù, and A. F. Koenderink, Experimental observation of a polarization vortex at an optical bound state in the continuum, Nature Photonics 12, 397–401 (2018)

    2018

  44. [54]

    Munkhbat, P

    B. Munkhbat, P. Wróbel, T. J. Antosiewicz, and T. O. Shegai, Optical constants of several multilayer transition metal dichalcogenides measured by spectroscopic ellipsometry in the 300–1700 nm range: high index, anisotropy, and hyperbolicity, ACS Photonics 9, 2398 (2022)

    2022

  45. [55]

    Keilmann and R

    F. Keilmann and R. Hillenbrand, Near-field microscopy by elastic light scattering from a tip, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 362, 787 (2004)

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.