Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 109 references

Can Decision Trees Teach Large Language Models? Distilling Verbalized Knowledge for Molecular Property Prediction

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An extended magnetic island can pin zero-field superconducting vortices—and Majorana modes—in correlated Rashba systems by converting spin into flux.

desk verdict Solid GL theory for zero-field vortices from extended magnetic islands in correlated Rashba SCs; the load-bearing premise is correlations without long-range order. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.12344 v2 pith:OICPKZU7 submitted 2026-03-12 cs.LG

Khiem Le , Sreejata Dey , Marcos Martínez Galindo , Vanessa Lopez , Ting Hua , Nitesh V. Chawla , Hoang Thanh Lam This is my paper
classification cs.LG PACS 74.20.De74.25.Ha74.78.-w03.65.Vf
keywords zero-fieldvorticesMajoranazeromodesRashbasuperconductorsmagneticislandsmagnetoelectriccouplingGinzburg-Landautheorytopologicalinsulatorsurfacescorrelations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that you do not need an external magnetic field to stabilize superconducting vortices that can trap Majorana zero modes. In a quasi-2D superconductor with Rashba spin-orbit coupling and magnetic correlations (but no long-range order), a large out-of-plane magnetic island that couples only by exchange generates an effective flux through Zeeman and magnetoelectric effects. The induced electronic magnetization “dresses” the island’s moment, which can strongly favor vortices of controlled vorticity. Applying the same Ginzburg–Landau picture to topological-insulator surfaces and planar Rashba metals, the authors give concrete conditions under which those vortices bind Majorana modes—domain-wall modes on TI surfaces and core–rim pairs in Rashba metals—placing the scenario within experimental reach for materials such as FeTeSe and disordered Pb hybrids.

What carries the argument

A phenomenological Ginzburg–Landau functional for the gauge-invariant vector potential, the island spin profile, and the induced electronic magnetization, reduced to a closed-form vortex solution and a spin-to-vorticity conversion factor (α̃) that sets the integer vorticity as the integer nearest to α̃ times the effective flux quanta of the island.

What would settle it

Deposit an extended out-of-plane magnetic island (radius ≫ coherence length) on a correlated Rashba superconductor such as FeTeSe or disordered Pb/Si and look, in zero external field, for a vortex whose core or domain-wall hosts a zero-bias conductance peak whose spatial extent tracks the predicted effective island radius and whose presence requires odd vorticity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a type-II Rashba superconductor with magnetic correlations but without long-range order, an extended out-of-plane magnetic island (radius much larger than the coherence length) that is only exchange-coupled to the electrons sources an effective magnetic flux via Zeeman plus Rashba magnetoelectric couplings; the self-consistent electronic magnetization dresses the island moment and stabilizes a zero-field vortex whose vorticity is fixed by a spin-to-vorticity conversion factor, and under stated topological criteria that vortex binds Majorana zero modes.

Load-bearing premise

The superconductor must sit close enough to a magnetic instability for correlations to dress and amplify the island moment, yet still far enough that long-range magnetic order never forms.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Zero-field vortices with controlled odd vorticity can be engineered by magnetic islands without relying on Abrikosov cores induced by external fields.
  • On superconducting TI surfaces the same island can trap a single domain-wall Majorana zero mode whose radial location is set by compensation of exchange and pairing gaps.
  • In planar Rashba metals an odd-vorticity island vortex produces a core–rim Majorana pair, offering a self-tuned platform for proposals that need paired Majoranas.
  • Disorder lowers the exchange-energy threshold for vortex formation, making elemental SCs with large Fermi energy viable candidates when correlations or mean-free-path reduction are present.
  • Magnetic-correlation strength (RPA dressing) becomes a practical tuning knob for both vortex stability and the topological criterion for Majorana binding.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Gate-tunable semiconductor–ferromagnet–superconductor hybrids could meet both the vortex-stability and topological criteria more cleanly than bulk elemental SCs because the Fermi energy can be dialed down.
  • If the predicted zero-field vortices appear without accompanying Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states, they would give a cleaner spectroscopic window on vortex Majoranas than impurity-pinned scenarios that mix in-gap impurity modes.
  • Mapping how vorticity jumps with island radius or correlation length would directly test the spin-to-vorticity conversion factor and distinguish this mechanism from stray-field or skyrmion-driven alternatives.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a mechanism for stabilizing zero-field superconducting vortices (and associated Majorana zero modes) in quasi-2D Rashba superconductors that are exchange-coupled to extended out-of-plane magnetic islands. Using a Ginzburg–Landau functional that includes Zeeman and Rashba magnetoelectric couplings, and allowing for magnetic correlations without long-range order, the authors obtain closed-form vortex profiles for an island spin density ∝ K_0(r/ρ_I), derive a spin-to-vorticity conversion factor α̃, and give a threshold exchange energy for single-vorticity pinning. They apply the framework to superconducting TI surface states (motivated by FeTeSe) and disordered Rashba metals (motivated by Pb/Si), and discuss domain-wall MZMs versus core–rim MZM pairs under adiabatic topological criteria.

Significance. If the assumptions hold, the work supplies a concrete, analytically tractable route to zero-field vortex–Majorana composites that does not rely on Abrikosov vortices or Yu–Shiba–Rusinov physics, and that is potentially relevant to ongoing experiments on FeTeSe and magnetic-island/Pb hybrids. Strengths include systematic derivation of the GL functional, exact Hankel-transform solutions for the chosen island profile, controlled Bessel asymptotics for the energy, microscopic evaluation of χ_spin^⊥, Γ_R, superfluid and magnetic stiffnesses, and falsifiable threshold estimates (e.g., M̃_z ∼ 0.9 meV for TI surfaces). The RPA dressing of the island moment and the weak-coupling conversion-factor hierarchy are useful organizing results for the community.

major comments (3)
  1. Sec. IV (redefinition of magnetization, constraint 1 − U χ_spin^⊥ > 0) and Sec. V material estimates: the vortex-stability window and the RPA enhancement of M̃_z both require the SC to sit close to a magnetic instability (ũ → 1^−, ξ_M large) without ordering. This is load-bearing for the FeTeSe and Pb claims, yet the manuscript only cites proximity to magnetism and a Hubbard scale ∼1 eV for Pb. A quantitative bound—how close ũ must be for M̃_z to reach the thresholds of Eqs. (69)–(71), and whether that window is compatible with the absence of long-range order in the cited compounds—should be added, or the claims for those materials should be softened to “possible if correlations are strong.”
  2. Sec. III C / Eq. (17): the island profile M_z(r) ∝ K_0(r/ρ_I) is chosen solely so that Fourier/Hankel transforms close. While convenient, the conversion factor α̃ and the spatial structure of B_z and the dressed moment depend on this shape. At least one alternative profile (e.g., a top-hat or Gaussian island of comparable total moment and radius) should be checked numerically to confirm that the qualitative hierarchy of α̃ with (ρ_I, λ_L, ξ_M) and the single-vorticity threshold remain intact.
  3. Sec. VI B–C (topological criteria): the adiabatic Chern / Z_2 arguments assume spatial variations slower than the Fermi wavelength and discard A_{x,y} from the gauge-invariant momentum. For the TI case the domain-wall radius ρ_dw is set by compensation of Δ(r) and M̃_z(r) and need not coincide with ξ_S; for the Rashba metal the core–rim pair requires |M̃_z| ≳ √(E_F² + Δ²). The manuscript should state more clearly which of the experimental platforms (FeTeSe vs. Pb/Si vs. gated SC–semiconductor hybrids) can realistically satisfy both the vortex-pinning threshold and the topological criterion simultaneously, and what spectroscopic signature would distinguish a domain-wall MZM from a conventional vortex core state.
minor comments (6)
  1. Fig. 2 caption and surrounding text use ν_ϕ / ρ_I / λ_L inconsistently with the main-text notation (ϕ, ρ_I, λ_L); unify symbols.
  2. Fig. 3 panels (a)–(f): the vertical-axis prefactors that convert the plotted curves into α̃ are easy to miss; state them in the caption as well as in the figure.
  3. Sec. V B: disorder is incorporated only via rescaling ξ_S and λ_L; a short remark that χ_spin^⊥ and Γ_R are left unrenormalized (and why that is acceptable given free parameters ũ, M_z, ρ_I) would help.
  4. Appendix B: the strong-coupling approximation for the hierarchy ρ_I ≪ ξ_M ≪ λ_L overestimates α̃ by nearly an order of magnitude for the chosen numerical ratios; note the limited separation of scales as the source of the discrepancy.
  5. Typos: “magnetoelectic” (p. 16), “ari-sing” (p. 1), “fa-shion” (p. 3); also “Little-Parks vs Meissner” section title could be “Little–Parks versus Meissner.”
  6. References: several arXiv-only entries (e.g., Garnier et al., Kotetes et al. 2024) should be updated if journal versions exist; Ref. 35 appears twice in slightly different forms.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: GL vortex solutions, conversion factor, and MZM criteria are derived from the stated functional and microscopic response functions; self-citations supply independent coefficients, not the target claim.

full rationale

The central derivation (Secs. III–IV) starts from a phenomenological GL energy density that couples the island spin moment to the gauge-invariant vector potential via Zeeman and Rashba magnetoelectric terms, plus (when correlations are kept) a Hubbard-type magnetic channel with stiffness ξ_M. Extremizing that functional for a chosen island profile (Eq. 17) yields closed-form B_z, M_z and the spin-to-vorticity conversion factor α̃ (Eqs. 28–29 without correlations; Eqs. 61–63 with correlations). The integer vorticity that minimizes the energy is then the integer nearest to α̃·(induced flux quanta). None of these steps is a fit to the experimental claim of zero-field vortices; the conversion factor and the threshold exchange energy (Eq. 69) are algebraic consequences of the GL extremum under the stated length-scale hierarchies. Microscopic values of Γ_R, χ_spin^⊥, superfluid stiffness and magnetic stiffness are taken from the authors’ prior response-function calculations (App. C–F, citing Ref. 56) and from published material parameters for FeTeSe and disordered Pb/Si(111). Those citations supply input coefficients, not a uniqueness theorem that forces the vortex conclusion; the vortex-stability and MZM criteria are new content derived inside the present manuscript. The island profile and the adiabatic topological analysis (Sec. VI) are modeling choices, not self-definitional reductions. The only minor self-citation is the reuse of previously computed magnetoelectric coefficients; it is not load-bearing for the logical structure of the argument. Score 1 reflects that single non-load-bearing self-citation; the derivation chain itself is self-contained under the paper’s explicit assumptions (ρ_I ≫ ξ_S, ũ < 1, weak Γ, etc.).

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on a phenomenological GL expansion, a set of length-scale inequalities, the absence of long-range magnetic order, a convenient island profile, and microscopic response functions evaluated in a representative Rashba BdG model. No new particles are postulated; the ‘dressed’ moment is an RPA renormalization of an existing island spin. Free parameters are the island size and moment, the dimensionless interaction ũ, and material numbers taken from experiment or standard estimates.

free parameters (3)
  • island radius ρ_I (and total spin moment M_z)
    Chosen by hand to satisfy ρ_I ≫ ξ_S and to scan the conversion factor; not measured for a specific device in this work.
  • dimensionless magnetic interaction ũ ∈ [0,1)
    Controls proximity to the magnetic instability and therefore ξ_M and the RPA dressing; scanned but not fixed by an independent measurement.
  • sample thickness w, g-factor, cutoff Λ, α_R, E_F, Δ
    Set to representative literature values for FeTeSe (w=5 nm, E_F=4.5 meV, Δ=1.5 meV, …) and Pb/Si (disordered); they fix λ_L, ξ_S and the microscopic coefficients.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Ginzburg–Landau expansion to second order in magnetization and gradients is valid outside a negligible vortex core (ξ_S much smaller than all other lengths).
    Stated in Sec. III A and IV A; standard for type-II vortex physics but excludes core-state energetics that matter in the quantum-anomalous-vortex scenario.
  • domain assumption Magnetic correlations exist and produce a finite ξ_M without establishing long-range magnetic order (1 − U χ_spin^⊥ > 0).
    Load-bearing premise of Sec. IV; motivated by FeTeSe proximity to magnetism but not independently verified for the precise parameter window used.
  • domain assumption The magnetic island is large enough that it does not induce Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states and couples only by exchange (no stray-field orbital driving).
    Stated in the introduction and Fig. 1 caption; distinguishes the mechanism from impurity-core scenarios.
  • ad hoc to paper Island spin density is taken as M_z(r) ∝ K_0(r/ρ_I) so that Fourier/Hankel transforms close analytically.
    Sec. III C; chosen for tractability. Qualitative conclusions are argued to be robust, but quantitative α̃ depends on the profile.
  • standard math Standard class-D topological invariants (Z_2 from Chern number × vorticity parity; fractional Chern for TI surfaces) correctly predict MZM presence under the adiabatic approximation.
    Sec. VI; textbook application of known defect topology.
invented entities (2)
  • spin-to-vorticity conversion factor α (and its correlated version α̃)
    purpose: Maps island flux quanta to the integer vorticity that minimizes the GL energy.
    Derived quantity, not a new physical object; independent evidence would be a measured vorticity versus island moment.
  • RPA-dressed island moment M̃_z = M_z / (U Γ_M)
    purpose: Encodes how magnetic correlations amplify the effective exchange field felt by the superconductor.
    Standard RPA renormalization applied to the island; falsifiable if local probes show no enhanced moment near the island.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Can Decision Trees Teach Large Language Models? Distilling Verbalized Knowledge for Molecular Property Prediction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OICPKZU7

@misc{pith2026260312344,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Can Decision Trees Teach Large Language Models? Distilling Verbalized Knowledge for Molecular Property Prediction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OICPKZU7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.12344}
}
read the original abstract

Molecular Property Prediction (MPP) is a fundamental problem in drug discovery that has recently attracted growing attention. Large Language Models (LLMs), known for their impressive proficiency across domains, show promise as generalist models for MPP. However, their current performance remains below the threshold needed for practical adoption. To bridge this gap, we propose TreeKD for distilling the knowledge of tree-based specialist models into LLMs to complement the internal knowledge of LLMs and improve their predictive accuracy. For each property, we train a specialist decision tree using features derived from 40K functional groups in the input molecules. Then, the predictive rule learned by the decision tree, which encodes its knowledge, is verbalized and incorporated into the prompts for training LLMs. In addition, by replacing a single decision tree with a Random Forest, we introduce a test-time scaling technique called rule-consistency, which aggregates predictions generated from different prompts constructed with different rules. An extensive evaluation with two LLMs, Gemma-2-2B and Granite-3.3-2B, on the TDC benchmark with 22 prediction tasks shows that our method substantially enhances the performance of LLMs, advancing the development of generalist models for MPP.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    This further implies that at this level of approximation the variables� ± enter at zeroth order in�

    Weak Coupling Limit In the case that���is sufficiently weak, we consider the spin-to-vorticity conversion factor ˜�at zeroth order with respect to�. This further implies that at this level of approximation the variables� ± enter at zeroth order in�. Hence, in the weak coupling limit, the lengthscales �± are approximately given by� L and� M. Due to the fac...

  2. [2]

    Thus, here we have the condition���=��� max, which leads to� ± �¯�with the common lengthscale 1�¯�= � � 1��2 M + 1��2 L � �2

    Strong Coupling Limit Having examined the weak coupling regime in detail, we now explore the other extreme limit, i.e., the one in which the coupling between magnetization and magnetic fields is the strongest possible. Thus, here we have the condition���=��� max, which leads to� ± �¯�with the common lengthscale 1�¯�= � � 1��2 M + 1��2 L � �2. The arising ...

  3. [3]

    Superconducting Topological Surface States From Ref. 56, one finds that the magnetoelectic coef- ficient is discontinuous across ∆ = 0 and that for ∆�0 it takes the form: � R = sgn(�) 8Φ0 � �δ +� 2 ln � � 1 +� δ �� �(C1) which is parametrized using the function� δ = � 1 +� 2, that depends on the dimensionless variable�= ∆�� soc. In the above we defined th...

  4. [4]

    ultraviolet

    Rashba Metal We now repeat the above procedure for a Rashba metal. In contrast to the TI case, here, the Fermi energy is the dominant energy scale, i.e., much larger than the Rashba splitting and the pairing gap. In fact, for certain calculations within this so-called quasiclassical limit,� F can be taken to be equal to positive infinity. In this sense, a...

  5. [5]

    For convenience, we assume for the rest of this paragraph that�� ϕ�= 1, in which case� ν� becomes a projector operator

    Fu-Kane Model We proceed by first briefly reminding the reader of the emergence of MZMs in the Fu-Kane model [3]. For convenience, we assume for the rest of this paragraph that�� ϕ�= 1, in which case� ν� becomes a projector operator. Since in the Fu-Kane model ˜�z(�) is zero and as a result [� ν� � �y� y] = 0, the two different subspaces spanned by the pr...

  6. [6]

    The addition of ˜�z(�) implies that the presence of the vortex cannot effectively close the energy gap at the points of space where ∆(�) = 0

    Our Model In stark contrast to the Fu-Kane framework, a different mechanism becomes relevant in our work. The addition of ˜�z(�) implies that the presence of the vortex cannot effectively close the energy gap at the points of space where ∆(�) = 0. The MZM appears here as a conse- quence of a Majorana chiral edge mode which is trapped at the domain wall wh...

  7. [7]

    Read and D

    N. Read and D. Green,Paired States of Fermions in Two dimensions with Breaking of Parity and Time- Reversal Symmetries, and the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. B61, 10267 (2000)

    2000

  8. [8]

    G. E. Volovik,Fermion zero modes on vortices in chiral superconductors, JETP Lett.70, 609 (1999)

    1999

Show all 109 references
  1. [9]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane,Superconducting Proximity Effect and Majorana Fermions at the Surface of a Topological Insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 096407 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    J. D. Sau, R. M. Lutchyn, S. Tewari, and S. Das Sarma, Generic New Platform for Topological Quantum Com- putation Using Semiconductor Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 040502 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Hosur, P

    P. Hosur, P. Ghaemi, R. S. K. Mong, and A. Vish- wanath,Majorana Modes at the Ends of Superconduc- tor Vortices in Doped Topological Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 097001 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    C.-K. Chiu, M. J. Gilbert, and T. L. Hughes,Vor- tex lines in topological insulator-superconductor het- erostructures, Phys. Rev. B84, 144507 (2011)

    2011

  5. [13]

    R. R. Biswas,Majorana Fermions in Vortex Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 136401 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Z. F. Wang, H. Zhang, D. Liu, C. Liu, C. Tang, C. Song, Y. Zhong, J. Peng, F. Li, C. Nie, L. Wang, X. J. Zhou, X. Ma, Q. K. Xue, and F. Liu,Topological edge states in a high-temperature superconductor FeSe/SrTiO 3(001) film, Nat. Mat.15, 968 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Zhang, K

    P. Zhang, K. Yaji, T. Hashimoto, Y. Ota, T. Kondo, K. Okazaki, Z. Wang, J. Wen, G. D. Gu, H. Ding, and S. Shin,Observation of topological superconductivity on the surface of an iron-based superconductor, Science360, 182 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    Zhang, Z

    P. Zhang, Z. Wang, X. Wu, K. Yaji, Y. Ishida, Y. Kohama, G. Dai, Y. Sun, C. Bareille, K. Kuroda, T. Kondo, K. Okazaki, K. Kindo, X. Wang, C. Jin, J. Hu, R. Thomale, K. Sumida, S. Wu, K. Miyamoto, T. Okuda, H. Ding, G. D. Gu, T. Tamegai, T. Kawakami, M. Sato, and S. Shin,Multip...

    2019

  9. [17]

    S. S. Zhang, J.-X. Yin, G. Dai, L. Zhao, T.-R. Chang, N. Shumiya, K. Jiang, H. Zheng, G. Bian, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, G. Chang, I. Belopolski, T. A. Cochran, X. Wu, D. Wu, J. Luo, G. Chen, H. Lin, F.-C. Chou, X. Wang, C. Jin, R. Sankar, Z. Wang, and M. Z. Hasan,Field-free p...

    2021

  10. [18]

    L. Kong, L. Cao, S. Zhu, M. Papaj, G. Dai, G. Li, P. Fan, W. Liu, F. Yang, X. Wang, S. Du, C. Jin, L. Fu, H.-J. Gao, and H. Ding,Tunable vortex Majorana zero modes in LiFeAs superconductor, Nat. Commun.12, 4146 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Z. Wang, P. Zhang, G. Xu, L. K. Zeng, H. Miao, X. Xu, T. Qian, H. Weng, P. Richard, A. V. Fedorov, H. Ding, X. Dai, and Z. Fang,Topological nature of the � ��� 0�5� �0�5 superconductor, Phys. Rev. B92, 115119 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    G. Xu, B. Lian, P. Tang, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological Superconductivity on the Surface of Fe- Based Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 047001 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    E. J. K¨ onig and P. Coleman,Crystalline symmetry pro- tected helical Majorana modes in the iron pnictides, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 207001 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    S. Qin, L. Hu, X. Wu, X. Dai, C. Fang, F.-C. Zhang, and J. Hu,Topological Vortex Phase Transitions in Iron- Based Superconductors, Sci. Bull.64, 1207 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    C.-K. Chiu, T. Machida, Y. Huang, T. Hanaguri, and F.-C. Zhang,Scalable Majorana vortex modes in iron- based superconductors, Sci. Adv.6, eaay0443 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Pathak, S

    V. Pathak, S. Plugge, and M. Franz,Majorana bound states in vortex lattices on iron-based superconductors, Annals of Physics435, 168431 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Li, X.-J

    C. Li, X.-J. Luo, L. Chen, D. E. Liu, F.-C. Zhang, and X. Liu,Controllable Majorana vortex states in iron-based superconducting nanowires, Natl. Sci. Rev. 9, nwac095 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Zhang, K

    P. Zhang, K. Yaji, T. Hashimoto, Y. Ota, T. Kondo, K. Okazaki, Z. Wang, J. Wen, G. D. Gu, H. Ding, and S. Shin,Observation of topological superconductivity on the surface of iron-based superconductor, Science360, 182 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    D. Wang, L. Kong, P. Fan, H. Chen, S. Zhu, W. Liu, L. Cao, Y. Sun, S. Du, J. Schneeloch, R. Zhong, G. Gu, L. Fu, H. Ding, and H.-J. Gao,Observation of pristine Majorana bound state in iron-based superconductor, Sci- ence362, 333 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Q. Liu, C. Chen, T. Zhang, R. Peng, Y. J. Yan, C. H. P. Wen, X. Lou, Y. L. Huang, J. P. Tian, X. L. Dong, G. W. Wang, W. C. Bao, Q. H. Wang, Z. P. Yin, Z.-X. Zhao, and D. L. Feng,Robust and clean Majorana zero mode in the vortex core of high-temperature supercon- ductor (Li 0�...

    2018

  21. [29]

    Machida, Y

    T. Machida, Y. Sun, S. Pyon, S. Takeda, Y. Kohsaka, T. Hanaguri, T. Sasagawa, and T. Tamegai,Zero-energy vortex bound state in the superconducting topological surface state of Fe(Se,Te), Nat. Mater.18, 811 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    L. Kong, S. Zhu, M. Papaj, L. Cao, H. Isobe, W. Liu, D. Wang, P. Fan, H. Chen, Y. Sun, S. Du, J. Schnee- loch, R. Zhong, G. Gu, L. Fu, H.-J. Gao, and H. Ding, Observation of half-integer level shift of vortex bound states in an iron-based superconductor, Nat. Phys.15, 1181 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    S. Zhu, L. Kong, L. Cao, H. Chen, M. Papaj, S. Du, Y. Xing, W. Liu, D. Wang, C. Shen, F. Yang, J. Schnee- loch, R. Zhong, G. Gu, L. Fu, Y.-Y. Zhang, H. Ding, and H.-J. Gao,Nearly quantized conductance plateau of vortex zero mode in an iron-based superconductor, Sci- ence367, 1...

    2020

  24. [32]

    J.-X. Yin, Z. Wu, J.-H. Wang, Z.-Y. Ye, J. Gong, X.-Y. Hou, L. Shan, A. Li, X.-J. Liang, X.-X. Wu, J. Li, C.-S. 25 Ting, Z. Wang, J.-P. Hu, P.-H. Hor, H. Ding, and S. H. Pan,Observation of a robust zero-energy bound state in iron-based superconductor Fe(Te,Se), Nat. Phys.11, 5...

    2015

  25. [33]

    Thampy, J

    V. Thampy, J. Kang, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, W. Bao, A. T. Savici, J. Hu, T. J. Liu, B. Qian, D. Fobes, Z. Q. Mao, C. B. Fu, W. C. Chen, Q. Ye, R. W. Erwin, T. R. Gentile, Z. Tesanovic, and C. Broholm,Friedel- Like Oscillations from Interstitial Iron in Superconduct- ing Fe 1+�...

    2012

  26. [34]

    G. C. M´ enard, A. Mesaros, C. Brun, F. Debontridder, D. Roditchev, P. Simon, and T. Cren,Isolated pairs of Majorana zero modes in a disordered superconducting lead monolayer, Nat. Commun.10, 2587 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    S. S. Pershoguba, S. Nakosai, and A. V. Balatsky, Skyrmion-induced bound states in a superconductor, Phys. Rev. B94, 064513 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    G. Yang, P. Stano, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss,Majorana bound states in magnetic skyrmions, Phys. Rev. B93, 224505 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    S. Rex, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin,Majorana bound states in magnetic skyrmions imposed onto a supercon- ductor, Phys. Rev. B100, 064504 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Garnier, A

    M. Garnier, A. Mesaros, and P. Simon,Topological su- perconductivity with orbital effects in magnetic skyrmion based heterostructures, arXiv:1909.12671

    1909 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Garnier, A

    M. Garnier, A. Mesaros, and P. Simon,Topological superconductivity with deformable magnetic skyrmions, Commun. Phys.2, 126 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Persky, A

    E. Persky, A. V. Bjørlig, I. Feldman, A. Almoalem, E. Altman, E. Berg, I. Kimchi, J. Ruhman, A. Kanigel, and B. Kalisky,Magnetic memory and spontaneous vortices in a van der Waals superconductor, Nature607, 692 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    B. A. Levitan, Y. Oreg, and E. Berg,Anomalous cur- rents and spontaneous vortices in spin-orbit coupled su- perconductors, npj Quantum Materials10, 58 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    H. S. Greenside, E. I. Blount, and C. M. Varma,Possible Coexisting Superconducting and Magnetic States, Phys. Rev. Lett.46, 49 (1981)

    1981

  35. [43]

    Tachiki, A

    M. Tachiki, A. Kotani, H. Matsumoto, and H. Umezawa,Spin-spiral ordering in magnetic supercon- ductors, Solid State Commun.31, 927 (1979)

    1979

  36. [44]

    Tachiki, H

    M. Tachiki, H. Matsumoto, T. Koyama, and H. Umezawa,Self-induced vortices in magnetic supercon- ductors, Solid State Commun.34, 19 (1980)

    1980

  37. [45]

    C. G. Kuper, M. Revzen, and A. Ron,Ferromagnetic Superconductors: A Vortex Phase in Ternary Rare- Earth Compounds, Phys. Rev. Lett.44, 1545 (1980)

    1980

  38. [46]

    Tewari, D

    S. Tewari, D. Belitz, T. R. Kirkpatrick, and J. Toner,Spontaneous Flux Lattices in Ferromagnetic Spin-Triplet Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 177002 (2004)

    2004

  39. [47]

    T. K. Ng and C. M. Varma,Spontaneous Vortex Phase Discovered?, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 330 (1997)

    1997

  40. [48]

    Deguchi, E

    K. Deguchi, E. Osaki, S. Ban, N. Tamura, Y. Simura, T. Sakakibara, I. Satoh, and N. K. Sato,Absence of Meiss- ner State and Robust Ferromagnetism in the Supercon- ducting State of UCoGe: Possible Evidence of Sponta- neous Vortex State, J. Phys. Soc. Japan.79, 083708 (2010)

    2010

  41. [49]

    W.-H. Jiao, Q. Tao, Z. Ren, Y. Liu, and G.-H. Cao, Evidence of spontaneous vortex ground state in an iron-based ferromagnetic superconductor, npj Quantum Mater.2, 50 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    A. V. Samokhvalov, A. S. Mel’nikov, and A. I. Buzdin, Vortex states induced by proximity effect in hybrid ferromagnet-superconductor systems, Phys. Rev. B76, 184519 (2007)

    2007

  43. [51]

    L. A. B. Olde Olthof, X. Montiel, J. W. A. Robinson, and A. I. Buzdin,Superconducting vortices generated via spin-orbit coupling at superconductor/ferromagnet interfaces, Phys. Rev. B100, 220505(R) (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    K. M. D. Hals, M. Schecter, and M. S. Rud- ner,Composite Topological Excitations in Ferromagnet- Superconductor Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 017001 (2016). [47]Generation of a superconducting vortex via N´ eel skyrmions, J. Baumard, J. Cayssol, F. S. Bergeret, and A....

    2016

  45. [53]

    Jiang, X

    K. Jiang, X. Dai, and Z. Wang,Quantum anomalous vortex and Majorana zero mode in iron-based supercon- ductor Fe(Te,Se), Phys. Rev. X9, 011033 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    Caroli, P

    C. Caroli, P. G. De Gennes, and J. Matricon,Bound Fermion states on a vortex line in a type II supercon- ductor, Phys. Lett.9, 307 (1964)

    1964

  47. [55]

    P. Fan, F. Yang, G. Qian, H. Chen, Y.-Y. Zhang, G. Li, Z. Huang, Y. Xing, L. Kong, W. Liu, K. Jiang, C. Shen, S. Du, J. Schneeloch, R. Zhong, G. Gu, Z. Wang, H. Ding, and H.-J. Gao,Observation of magnetic adatom-induced Majorana vortex and its hybridization with field-induced ...

    2021

  48. [56]

    Y. S. Lin, S. Y. Wang, X. Zhang, Y. Feng, Y. P. Pan, H. Ru, J. J. Zhu, B. K. Xiang, K. Liu, C. L. Zheng, L. Y. Wei, M. X. Wang, Z. K. Liu, L. Chen, K. Jiang, Y. F. Guo, Z. Wang, and Y. H. Wang,Direct Observation of Quantum Anomalous Vortex in Fe(Se,Te), Phys. Rev. X13, 011046 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Yu,Bound state in superconductors with paramag- netic impurities, Acta Phys

    L. Yu,Bound state in superconductors with paramag- netic impurities, Acta Phys. Sin.21, 75 (1965); H. Shiba,Classical spins in superconductors, Prog. Theor. Phys.40, 435 (1968); A. I. Rusinov,Theory of gap- less superconductivity in alloys containing paramagnetic impurities, Z...

    1965

  50. [58]

    J. M. Tranquada, G. Xu and I. A. Zaliznyak,Magnetism and superconductivity in Fe1+� Te1−� Se� , J. Phys.: Con- dens. Matter32, 374003 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    Kreisel, P

    A. Kreisel, P. J. Hirschfeld, and B. M. Andersen,On the Remarkable Superconductivity of FeSe and Its Close Cousins, Symmetry12, 1402 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    Therefore, di- rect replacement of ˆ�yields the Zeeman term in Eq

    This is understood by recalling that the original expres- sion of the Zeeman term within the BdG framework takes the form� � =�� �ˆ�� ˆ� � ��� ��(4�). Therefore, di- rect replacement of ˆ�yields the Zeeman term in Eq. (2). When we instead consider a gauge in which ˆ�does not i...

  53. [61]

    Kotetes, H

    P. Kotetes, H. O. M. Sura, and B. M. Andersen, Anatomy of spin and current generation from magne- tization gradients in topological insulators and Rashba metals, Phys. Rev. B108, 155310 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    P. G. de Gennes,Superconductivity Of Metals And Al- loys (Advanced Books Classics), (Westview Press 1966). 26

    1966

  55. [63]

    Note that either term leads to a legitimate form for the coupling

    This symmetrization allows us to avoid any ambiguity in the choice of the form of the coupling, since any linear combination� 1�� (�) ˆ�� � ���(�) � +�2�(�)� � �� ˆ��� (�) � , with� 1 +� 2 =�does not alter the bulk physics. Note that either term leads to a legitimate form for ...

  56. [64]

    S. S. Pershoguba, K. Bj¨ ornson, A. M. Black-Schaffer, and A. V. Balatsky,Currents Induced by Magnetic Im- purities in Superconductors with Spin-Orbit Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 116602 (2015)

    2015

  57. [65]

    56, the coefficient� � was denoted�

    Note that in Ref. 56, the coefficient� � was denoted�

  58. [66]

    M. Roig, P. Kotetes, and B. M. Andersen,Superconduc- ting diodes from magnetization gradients, Phys. Rev. B 109, 144503 (2024)

    2024

  59. [67]

    Kotetes, M

    P. Kotetes, M. Roig, and B. M. Andersen,Nonrecipro- cal Equilibrium4�-Periodic Josephson Effect from Poor Man’s Majorana Zero Modes, arXiv:2409.13027 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Klein, D

    T. Klein, D. Braithwaite, A. Demuer, W. Knafo, G. Lapertot, C. Marcenat, P. Rodi¨ ere, I. Sheikin, P. Stro- bel, A. Sulpice, and P. Toulemonde,Thermodynamic phase diagram of Fe(Se0.5Te0.5) single crystals in fields up to28tesla, Phys. Rev. B82, 184506 (2010)

    2010

  61. [69]

    W. A. Little and R. D. Parks,Observation of Quan- tum Periodicity in the Transition Temperature of a Su- perconducting Cylinder, Phys. Rev. Lett.9, 9 (1962); R. D. Parks and W. A. Little,Fluxoid Quantization in a Multiply-Connected Superconductor, Phys. Rev.133, A97 (1964)

    1962

  62. [70]

    Prada, P

    E. Prada, P. San-Jose, M. W. A. de Moor, A. Geresdi, E. J. H. Lee, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, J. Nyg˚ ard, R. Aguado, and L. P. Kouwenhoven,From Andreev to Majorana bound states in hybrid superconductor-semiconductor nanowires, Nat. Rev. Phys.2, 575 (2020)

    2020

  63. [71]

    Bruus and K

    H. Bruus and K. Flensberg,Many-Body Quantum Theo- ry in Condensed Matter Physics: An Introduction, (Ox- ford, 2004; online edn, Oxford Academic, 2023)

    2004

  64. [72]

    Kong and D

    L.-Y. Kong and D. Hong,Emergent vortex Majorana zero mode in iron-based superconductors, Acta. Phys. Sin.69, 110301 (2020)

    2020

  65. [73]

    H. Lei, R. Hu, E. S. Choi, J. B. Warren, and C. Petrovic, Pauli-Limited Upper Critical Field of Fe 1+� Te1−� Se� , Phys. Rev. B81, 094518 (2010)

    2010

  66. [74]

    G. C. M´ enard, S. Guissart, C. Brun, R. T. Leriche, M. Trif, F. Debontridder, D. Demaille, D. Roditchev, P. Si- mon, and T. Cren,Two-dimensional topological super- conductivity in Pb/Co/Si(111), Nat. Commun.8, 2040 (2017)

  67. [75]

    Hansmann, T

    P. Hansmann, T. Ayral, L. Vaugier, P. Werner, and S. Biermann,Long-Range Coulomb Interactions in Surface Systems: A First-Principles Description within Self- Consistently Combined GW and Dynamical Mean-Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 166401 (2013)

    2013

  68. [76]

    Altland and M

    A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer,Nonstandard Symme- try Classes in Mesoscopic Normal-Superconducting Hy- brid Structures, Phys. Rev. B55, 1142 (1997)

    1997

  69. [77]

    S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki and A. W. W. Lud- wig,Topological Insulators and Superconductors: Ten- Fold Way and Dimensional Hierarchy, New J. Phys.12, 065010 (2010)

    2010

  70. [78]

    G. E. Volovik,The Universe in a Helium Droplet, (Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

    2003

  71. [79]

    J. C. Y. Teo and C. L. Kane,Topological Defects and Gapless Modes in Insulators and Superconductors, Phys. Rev. B82, 115120 (2010)

    2010

  72. [80]

    Alicea,New Directions in the Pursuit of Majorana Fermions in Solid State Systems, Rep

    J. Alicea,New Directions in the Pursuit of Majorana Fermions in Solid State Systems, Rep. Prog. Phys.75, 076501 (2012)

    2012

  73. [81]

    C 2 is no longer valid

    Note that in the case of a small Fermi energy which is comparable to ∆, the analysis that was carried out in Sec. C 2 is no longer valid. In this limit, the various parameters which govern the stabilization of supercon- ducting vortices can be obtained by extending the re- sul...

  74. [82]

    Brand, S

    C. Brand, S. Muff, M. Fanciulli, H. Pfn¨ ur, M. C. Tringides, J. H. Dil, and C. Tegenkamp,Spin-resolved band structure of a densely packed Pb monolayer on Si(111), Phys. Rev. B96, 035432 (2017)

    2017

  75. [83]

    M. F. Atiyah and I. M. Singer,The Index of Elliptic Operators: I, Ann. Math.87, 484 (1968)

    1968

  76. [84]

    Jackiw and and C

    R. Jackiw and and C. Rebbi,Solitons with fermion num- ber 1�2, Phys. Rev. D13, 3398 (1976)

    1976

  77. [85]

    A. Y. Kitaev,Unpaired Majorana Fermions in Quantum Wires, Phys. Usp.44, 131 (2001)

    2001

  78. [86]

    R. M. Lutchyn, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma,Majo- rana Fermions and a Topological Phase Transition in Semiconductor-Superconductor Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 077001 (2010)

    2010

  79. [87]

    Y. Oreg, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen,Helical Liquids and Majorana Bound States in Quantum Wires, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 177002 (2010)

    2010

  80. [88]

    Chatzopoulos, D

    D. Chatzopoulos, D. Cho, K. M. Bastiaans, G. O. Stef- fensen, D. Bouwmeester, A. Akbari, G. Gu, J. Paaske, B. M. Andersen, and M. P. Allan,Spatially dispersing Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states in the unconventional super- conductor FeTe0�55Se0�45, Nat. Comm.12, 298 (2021)

    2021

  81. [89]

    Uldemolins, A

    M. Uldemolins, A. Mesaros, G. D. Gu, A. Palacio- Morales, M. Aprili, P. Simon, and F. Massee,Hund’s coupling mediated multi-channel quantum phase transi- tion of a single magnetic impurity in Fe(Se,Te), Nat. Comm.15, 8526 (2024)

    2024

  82. [90]

    Fischer, M

    Ø. Fischer, M. Kugler, I. Maggio-Aprile, C. Berthod, and C. Renner,Scanning tunneling spectroscopy of high- temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 353 (2007)

    2007

  83. [91]

    Arovas, A

    P. Arovas, A. J. Berlinsky, C. Kallin, and S.-C. Zhang, Superconducting Vortex with Antiferromagnetic Core, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 2871 (1997)

    1997

  84. [92]

    B. M. Andersen, H. Bruus, and P. Hedeg˚ ard,SO(5) theory of insulating vortex cores in high-Tc materials, Phys. Rev. B61, 6298 (2000)

    2000

  85. [93]

    Chen and C

    Y. Chen and C. S. Ting,Magnetic-field-induced spin-density wave in high-temperature superconductors, Phys. Rev. B65, 180513 (2002)

    2002

  86. [94]

    Ghosal, C

    A. Ghosal, C. Kallin, and A. J. Berlinsky,Competi- tion of superconductivity and antiferromagnetism in a d-wave vortex lattice, Phys. Rev. B66, 214502 (2002)

    2002

  87. [95]

    J.-X. Zhu, I. Martin, and A. R. Bishop,Spin and Charge Order around Vortices and Impurities in High-Tc Su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 067003 (2002). 27

    2002

  88. [96]

    Takigawa, M

    M. Takigawa, M. Ichioka, and K. Machida,NMR Rela- xation Time around a Vortex in Stripe Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 047001 (2003)

    2003

  89. [97]

    L. Udby, B. M. Andersen, and P. Hedeg˚ ard,Recursion method for the quasiparticle structure of a single vortex with induced magnetic order, Phys. Rev. B73, 224510 (2006)

    2006

  90. [98]

    Schmid, B

    M. Schmid, B. M. Andersen, A. P. Kampf, and P. J. Hirschfeld,d-Wave superconductivity as a catalyst for antiferromagnetism in underdoped cuprates, New Jour- nal of Physics12, 053043 (2010)

    2010

  91. [99]

    N. B. Kopnin and E. B. Sonin,BCS Superconductivity of Dirac electrons in graphene layers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 246808 (2008)

    2008

  92. [100]

    N. B. Kopnin and E. B. Sonin,Supercurrent in super- conducting graphene, Phys. Rev. B82, 014516 (2010)

    2010

  93. [101]

    Liang, T

    L. Liang, T. I. Vanhala, S. Peotta, T. Siro, A. Harju, and P. T¨ orm¨ a,Band geometry, Berry curvature, and superfluid weight, Phys. Rev. B95, 024515 (2017)

    2017

  94. [102]

    J.-A. Wang, M. Assili, and P. Kotetes,Topological su- perfluid responses of superconducting Dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L022053 (2024)

    2024

  95. [103]

    J.-A. Wang, M. Assili, and P. Kotetes,Superfluid stiff- ness and Josephson quantum capacitance: Adiabatic ap- proach and topological effects, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023256 (2024)

    2024

  96. [104]

    Wang and P

    J.-A. Wang and P. Kotetes,Neural-Network- Assisted Detection of Superconducting Topological Semimetals,preprint onResearch Square (2024), https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5368971/v1

    2024 doi

  97. [105]

    Nishida, L

    Y. Nishida, L. Santos, and C. Chamon,Topological su- perconductors as nonrelativistic limits of Jackiw-Rossi and Jackiw-Rebbi models, Phys. Rev. B82, 144513 (2010)

    2010

  98. [106]

    Jackiw and P

    R. Jackiw and P. Rossi,Zero modes of the vortex- fermion system, Nucl. Phys. B190, 681 (1981)

    1981

  99. [107]

    Steffensen, B

    D. Steffensen, B. M. Andersen, and P. Kotetes,Trapping Majorana zero modes in vortices of magnetic texture crystals coupled to nodal superconductors, Phys. Rev. B104, 174502 (2021)

    2021

  100. [108]

    Kotetes, A

    P. Kotetes, A. Shnirman, and G. Sch¨ on,Enginee- ring and manipulating topological qubits in 1D quantum wires, J. Korean Phys. Soc.62, 1558 (2013)

    2013

  101. [109]

    Jiang, D

    L. Jiang, D. Pekker, J. Alicea, G. Refael, Y. Oreg, A. Brataas, and F. von Oppen,Magneto-Josephson effects in junctions with Majorana bound states, Phys. Rev. B 87, 075438 (2013)

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.