Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 46 references

Stable wrinkling in voltage and charge controlled dielectric membranes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In charge-controlled dielectric membranes, wrinkling is always stable, while in voltage control it is stable only while the tension-extension inequality holds.

desk verdict A clean but conditional theory of wrinkle stability in dielectric membranes; worth refereeing, needs a fix on the L′ region and a caveat on the convexity criterion. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06690 v1 pith:OIPT5OAK submitted 2019-08-19 cond-mat.soft

G. Zurlo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords dielectricelastomerswrinklingvoltagecontrolchargeenergyrelaxationtensionfieldtheorypull-ininstabilityneo-Hookeanmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

For neo-Hookean ideal dielectric membranes, this paper asks when wrinkling is a stable, usable state rather than a precursor to failure, and it answers with an energetic criterion. Under charge control the relaxed electromechanical energy is convex for every stretch, so taut, wrinkled, and tensionless states are all stable. Under voltage control a wrinkled state is stable exactly when the tension-extension inequality holds along the non-wrinkled direction, and above a critical field $E_{\mathrm{lim}}=\sqrt{3}/2^{4/3}\approx0.687$ no stable homogeneous state exists. This matters because stable wrinkling is a route to on-demand surface patterning, while pull-in instability is a common failure mode in dielectric elastomer actuators and energy harvesters.

What carries the argument

The central object is the relaxed electroelastic potential $\psi^*$, constructed from the parent energy $\psi$ by rank-one (tension-field) relaxation: wherever a principal stress computed from $\psi$ would be negative, the energy is replaced by its value at the natural-width state $\lambda_2^*(\lambda_1)$ at which the corresponding stress vanishes, and further shortening in that direction does not change the energy. In voltage control $\lambda_2^*(\lambda_1)=1/(\lambda_1^2-E^2\lambda_1^4)^{1/4}$, which is non-monotonic and gives two tensionless states; in charge control $\lambda_2^*(\lambda_1)=(1+D^2)^{1/4}/\sqrt{\lambda_1}$, which is monotone and gives one. The relaxed energy carries the argument because stability of a wrinkled state is then a one-dimensional question: convexity of $\psi^*$ in the wrinkled region is exactly the tension-extension inequality $\partial s_1^*/\partial\lambda_1\ge0$, while convexity in the taut region is the Hessian condition on $\psi$.

What would settle it

Perform a fixed-charge experiment on a prestretched neo-Hookean-like ideal dielectric membrane, injecting charge while monitoring thickness and in-plane deformation: the paper predicts that no homogeneous instability occurs at any charge level, so observing sudden thinning, snap-through, or localized necking would falsify the charge-control claim. In voltage control, record the stress-stretch curve in the wrinkled direction and check that loss of stability coincides with the slope $\partial s_1^*/\partial\lambda_1$ crossing zero; a mismatch would falsify the tension-extension criterion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, for ideal neo-Hookean dielectric membranes, the stability of electromechanical states, including wrinkled ones, is decided by convexity of the relaxed energy $\psi^*$ obtained by tension-field relaxation of the parent energy $\psi$. In voltage control the parent energy is $\psi(\lambda_1,\lambda_2;E)=w(\lambda_1,\lambda_2)-\frac{E^2}{2}(\lambda_1\lambda_2)^2$: the electric contribution is non-convex, so the region of taut states is closed and shrinks as $E$ grows, and it disappears altogether above $E_{\mathrm{lim}}=\sqrt{3}/2^{4/3}\approx0.687$. In the wrinkled regions $\psi^*$ is frozen at the state of zero transverse stress, and convexity reduces to the tension-extension inequality $\partial s_1^*/\partial\lambda_1\ge0$, namely that the axial stress in the non-wrinkled direction increases with stretch; stable wrinkling is exactly the region where this inequality holds, and unstable wrinkling is where it fails. In charge control the parent energy is $\psi(\lambda_1,\lambda_2;D)=w(\lambda_1,\lambda_2)+\frac{D^2}{2(\lambda_1\lambda_2)^2}$, whose electric term is strictly convex; since $w$ is assumed convex, the relaxed energy remains convex for all stretches, so no pull-in instability exists and wrinkling is always stable. Homogeneous and annular examples show that the order of wrinkling versus pull-in depends on prestretch and boundary conditions, and that failure can occur in the taut part, in the wrinkled part, or simultaneously.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's stability thresholds rest on treating stability as convexity of the relaxed energy in the two in-plane stretches, a local test that does not rule out all non-uniform three-dimensional perturbations; if that test is too weak, the critical fields and the charge-control 'always stable' conclusion would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In charge control, an ideal neo-Hookean membrane can be driven to arbitrarily large nominal electric displacement without a homogeneous pull-in instability, so charge control is a natural operating mode for maintaining wrinkle patterns.
  • In voltage control, stable actuation is limited: once $E>E_{\mathrm{lim}}\simeq0.687$ the taut region of the stretch plane is empty, meaning no stable homogeneous state exists for the membrane.
  • The hierarchy between wrinkling and pull-in can be tuned: depending on prestretch, a membrane may fail while still taut, fail only after wrinkling has set in, or lose tension and convexity at the same instant, as in the $2^{1/3}$ biaxial prestretch case at $E=0.687$.
  • In annular membranes with fixed rims, the boundary between wrinkled and non-wrinkled regions propagates inward as voltage rises, and the site of failure, taut outer region or wrinkled inner region, is set by the geometry: taut-region failure at $E\simeq0.384$ in one geometry and wrinkled-region failure at $E\simeq0.63$ in another.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the convexity criterion were replaced by a full three-dimensional quasiconvexity condition, the numerical thresholds $0.687$, $0.384$, and $0.63$, as well as the unconditional charge-control stability statement, might shift; the qualitative voltage-versus-charge divide, driven by the sign of the electric energy term, is likely to survive.
  • The same relaxation construction could be applied to non-ideal elastic energies such as Gent or Ogden models, where $E_{\mathrm{lim}}$ and the taut-region shape would change but the underlying mechanism, non-convex voltage term versus convex charge term, would not.
  • The charge-control prediction suggests a direct experiment: in a prestretched clamped membrane under fixed total charge, the absence of any homogeneous instability up to large charge would support the theory, while a sudden thinning or snap-through would contradict it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies stability of thin dielectric elastomer membranes under voltage versus charge control, using an energy-minimization framework based on Fosdick and Tang. For homogeneous deformations of incompressible neo-Hookean ideal dielectrics, the electroelastic potential is ψ = (λ1^2+λ2^2+λ1^{-2}λ2^{-2}-3)/2 minus (in voltage control) or plus (in charge control) the electrostatic term. The author argues that convexity of this potential is lost only in voltage control, leading to a limit field Elim = √3/2^{4/3} ≈ 0.687 above which no stable homogeneous state exists, while charge control preserves convexity for all D. Wrinkling is described through tension-field theory with a relaxed energy ψ*, and the paper claims that in voltage control wrinkling is stable exactly when the tension-extension inequality holds in the non-wrinkled direction, whereas in charge control all wrinkled states are stable. The final sections propose homogeneous and inhomogeneous experiments (annular disks) to illustrate the predicted stability hierarchy. The analysis is fully analytical and contains no fitted parameters.

Significance. If the convexity-based stability criterion is accepted, the paper delivers a clean and explicit energetic explanation of the voltage/charge divide for neo-Hookean membranes: charge control yields a globally convex energy, while voltage control produces a closed taut region whose collapse at Elim signals pull-in. The tension-field relaxation and the identification of stable wrinkling with the tension-extension inequality are valuable and testable. The paper is self-contained in its derivations and cites relevant prior work. However, the significance is conditional on two issues: (i) the relaxed energy in the region L′ is left undefined and then invoked to prove instability, and (ii) the paper identifies stability with convexity in the two principal stretches, a local diagonal condition that is weaker than quasiconvexity of the three-dimensional energy; the author acknowledges in Sec. V that localization modes are neglected, but the abstract states the stability results unconditionally.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (8) and Sec. III.B] The relaxed energy ψ* is declared 'undefined in L′' in Eq. (8), yet Sec. III.B immediately states that 'the energy of any point in this region is equal to the energy of the point B and, henceforth, it is unstable.' This is internally inconsistent: an undefined energy cannot be used to evaluate convexity or to conclude instability under the paper's own criterion. The conclusion that states in L′ are unstable, and hence that no stable homogeneous state exists for E > Elim, rests on this step. The author should either define ψ* in L′ as the constant ψ(λ′0,λ′0), which is the natural convex envelope construction, or justify the instability of L′ by a separate argument; otherwise the claim about the absence of stable states above Elim is unsupported.
  2. [Secs. II.B and III.B] Stability is identified with convexity of the relaxed energy as a function of the principal stretches (λ1,λ2). This is a local, diagonal condition on homogeneous modes only. For a thin but finite-thickness membrane, full incremental stability requires quasiconvexity or at least rank-one convexity of the three-dimensional electroelastic energy. In voltage control the three-dimensional neo-Hookean energy W(F)=|F|^2/2 - (E^2/2)|F^{-T}e3|^2 is not rank-one convex in general, so shear-band or short-wavelength modes may lose strong ellipticity at fields below Elim. The paper's own Sec. V acknowledges that localization is neglected, but the abstract and Sec. III.B state unconditional stability results. The author should either verify that the wrinkling mode is the critical mode among all perturbations (e.g., by an incremental stability analysis), or explicitly qualify the thresholds as conditional on the convexity criterion.
  3. [Sec. III.B, Fig. 5] The claim that the boundary between stable and unstable wrinkling in U1 occurs exactly at λ1 = λ1(C1), where C1 is the intersection of the curve det(∂i∂jψ)=0 with the edge λ2=λ2*(λ1), is asserted without proof. Verifying this requires showing that ∂1 s*1 = 0 precisely at that intersection. Since this equality determines the stability threshold for wrinkled states and is load-bearing for the partition in Fig. 5 and for the disk examples in Sec. IV, a derivation or a numerical check should be provided.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II.B] The text 'where λ1/slash.left2 are the stretches' should read 'where λ1, λ2 are the stretches'; the slash appears to be a typographical artifact.
  2. [Eq. (6)] The Hessian condition (6) is stated in a compact rational form; it would be helpful to show the intermediate expression det(∂i∂jψ) ≥ 0 so that readers can verify the inequality without algebra software.
  3. [Sec. IV.B] The statement 'since sθ < sr' is not justified; it is plausible for the described boundary conditions but should be argued from the equilibrium equations or stated as an assumption.
  4. [Sec. V] The phrase 'the real meaning of electromechanical instability is an open issue' is a strong caveat that somewhat undercuts the abstract's unconditional tone; the paper would be more consistent if the stability claims were phrased as 'under the convexity criterion' throughout.
  5. [References] Reference [40] is listed as 'private communications'; if this material is essential (e.g., the claim that charge control shifts taut states), it should be replaced by a citable published source.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: stability results follow analytically from the stated energies and convexity criterion; self-citations are contextual and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper’s central derivations are self-contained. The voltage-control potential (3) and charge-control potential (4) are prescribed from the electroelastic energy, and the stability thresholds follow directly from the stated convexity criterion: inequality (6) is the explicit Hessian condition for the neo-Hookean potential, charge-control convexity follows because (D/λ1λ2)^2/2 is convex in the principal stretches, and Elim = sqrt(3)/2^(4/3) follows from equating the two tensionless states A and B. The wrinkled-region result is also derived rather than imported: the relaxed energy (8) is built from tension-field theory, and convexity of ψ* in U1 reduces exactly to the tension-extension inequality, a calculation performed in Sec. III.B. No parameter is fitted to the predicted quantity, and no prediction is a renamed input. The self-citations to [13,29,30] concern prior context, specific geometries, or other constitutive relations; they are corroborative and not load-bearing in the derivation. The principal caveat is a limitation rather than circularity: stability is identified with local convexity of the relaxed membrane energy, which is weaker than full three-dimensional quasiconvexity, as acknowledged in Sec. V. There is also an internal rigor gap where ψ* is declared undefined in L′ in Eq. (8) but then used to assert instability there; this is not a circular input-output reduction. Overall, no circular step is exhibited, and the score reflects only the minor self-citations and the conditional stability criterion.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Fosdick-Tang energy principle, ideal neo-Hookean constitutive assumptions, the convexity-based stability criterion, and the tension-field relaxation. No new physical entities or fitted parameters are introduced, but the stability criterion and the treatment of L' are modeling choices rather than derived facts.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The electromechanical energy (1) from Fosdick and Tang is the correct potential to minimize.
    Sec. II.A, Eq. (1); the whole analysis rests on this variational principle.
  • domain assumption The material is an incompressible ideal dielectric with neo-Hookean elastic response and permittivity set to 1.
    Sec. II.B and Sec. II.C; this restricts all results to ideal neo-Hookean elastomers.
  • domain assumption The purely elastic energy w is convex.
    Stated in Sec. II.B to focus on electrically induced effects; this excludes purely mechanical instabilities.
  • domain assumption Electromechanical instability is identified with loss of convexity of the (relaxed) energy at stationary homogeneous states.
    Sec. II.B; the paper explicitly notes this is overly restrictive and neglects localized instabilities.
  • domain assumption Tension field theory provides the correct relaxation of the electroelastic energy for thin membranes.
    Sec. III.A, citing refs 15 and 37; used to construct psi*.
  • ad hoc to paper For the region L' in voltage control, the relaxed energy is flat at the level psi(B) and states there are unstable.
    Sec. III.A-B; the relaxed energy is not actually constructed in L', only asserted.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stable wrinkling in voltage and charge controlled dielectric membranes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OIPT5OAK

@misc{pith2026190806690,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stable wrinkling in voltage and charge controlled dielectric membranes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OIPT5OAK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06690}
}
read the original abstract

Thin dielectric elastomers with compliant electrodes exhibit various types of instability under the action of electromechanical loading. Guided by the thermodynamically-based formulation of Fosdick and Tang (J. Elasticity 88, 255-297, 2007), here we provide an energetic perspective on the stability of dielectric elastomers and we highlight the fundamental energetic divide between voltage control and charge control. By using the concept of energy relaxation, we describe wrinkling for neo-Hookean ideal elastomers, and we show that in voltage control wrinkling is stable as long as the tension-extension inequality holds, whereas wrinkling is always stable in charge control. We finally illustrate some examples involving both homogeneous and inhomogeneous deformations, showing that the type and hierarchy of instabilities taking place in dielectric membranes can be tuned by suitable choices of the boundary conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.06690 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A schematic representation of the current configura [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Left, electroelastic energies in voltage control for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. In voltage control and for a neo-Hookean energy, sta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Fig.4. Since in voltage control the points [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Stress distribution (left) and stability plane at failure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Stress distribution (left) and stability plane at failure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Carpi F., De Rossi D., Kornbluh R., Pelrine R., Sommer- Larsen P., Dielectric Elastomers as Electromechanical Transducers (edited by), Elsevier Ltd. (2008)

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    such that sα = /bracketleft.alt4∂ψ(λ1,λ 2) ∂λα /bracketright.alt4 (λe 1,λe 2) (α= 1, 2) (5) and for which ψ(λ1,λ 2) is locally convex [24]. Albeit it is well known that convexity is an overly restrictive condition in the description of large deformations [25], the incipient lack of convexity at a stationary homo- geneous state is identified with the so-cal...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Indeed, the relaxed energy ψ∗must be the largest increasing function of (λ1,λ 2) that is lower than ψ, see

    In such re- gions the relaxed energy should amount to a constant, but special care is required when dealing with the region L′. Indeed, the relaxed energy ψ∗must be the largest increasing function of (λ1,λ 2) that is lower than ψ, see

    work page

  4. [4]

    Just immediately prior to the onset of compressive stresses at the internal rim, forE = 0.38, convexity of the electroelastic energy is lost at the external rim

    As the electric field is increased from E = 0, both stress components relax in the disk. Just immediately prior to the onset of compressive stresses at the internal rim, forE = 0.38, convexity of the electroelastic energy is lost at the external rim. This is shown in the stability plane (left) where, for E = 0.38, we report the values of the stretches in t...

    work page

  5. [5]

    , Zhang Z.Q

    Godaba H. , Zhang Z.Q. , Gupta U. , Chiang Foo C. , Zhu J., Dynamic pattern of wrinkles in a dielectric elastomer. Soft Matter 13 (26), 2942–2951 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Colonnelli S., Saccomandi G., Zurlo G., Damage induced dissipation in electroactive polymer harvesters, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 163904 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Polymer Sci

    Colonnelli S., Saccomandi G., Zurlo G., The Role of Ma- terial Behavior in the Performances of Electroactive Poly- mer Energy Harvesters, J. Polymer Sci. B: Polymer Phys. 53, 1303–1314 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Catas- trophic thinning of dielectric elastomers

    Zurlo G., Destrade M., DeTommasi D., Puglisi G. Catas- trophic thinning of dielectric elastomers. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118(7) 078001 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Mao G. , Wu L. , Fu Y. , Liu J. , Qu S., Voltage- controlled radial wrinkles of a trumpet-like dielectric elas- tomer structure.. AIP Adv. 8 (3), 035314 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Yang S., Khare K., Lin P.C., Harnessing surface wrin- kle patterns in soft matter. Adv. Funct. Mater. 20, 2550 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Kollosche M., Kofod G., Suo Z., Zhu J., Temporal evolu- tion and instability in a viscoelastic dielectric elastomer. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 76, 47–64 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    , Li B., Chen H

    Liu X. , Li B., Chen H. , Jia S. , Zhou J., Voltage- induced wrinkling behavior of dielectric elastomer.. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 133 (14), 43258 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Greaney P., Meere M., Zurlo G, The out-of-plane be- haviour of dielectric membranes: Description of wrin- kling and pull-in instabilities. J. Mech. Phys. Solids122, 84–97 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Mao G. , Wu L. , Liang X. , Qu S., Morphology of voltage- triggered ordered wrinkles of a dielectric elastomer sheet.. J. Appl. Mech. 84 (11), 111005 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    , Xiang Y

    Mao G. , Xiang Y. , Huang X. , Hong W. , Lu T., Qu S., Viscoelastic effect on the wrinkling of an in- flated dielectric-elastomer balloon. J. Appl. Mech. 85 (7), 071003 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    DeTommasi D., Puglisi G., Saccomandi G., Zurlo G., Pull-in and wrinkling instabilities of electroactive dielec- tric actuators, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 325501 (2010)

    2010

  9. [17]

    Zurlo G., Destrade M., Lu T., Fine tuning the electro- mechanical response of dielectric elastomers, Appl. Phys. Letters 113, 162902 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Fosdick R., Tang H., Electrodynamics and Thermome- chanics of Material Bodies, J. Elast. 88, 255-297 (2007)

    2007

  11. [19]

    Steigmann D.J., Tension-field theory, Proc.R.Soc.Lond.A 429, 141–173 (1990)

    1990

  12. [20]

    Suo Z., Zhao X., Greene W.H., A nonlinear field theory of deformable dielectrics, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 56, 467-486 (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    Dorfmann L., Ogden R.W., Nonlinear Theory of Elec- troelastic and Magnetoelastic Interactions, Springer Sci- ence+Business Media New York (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Landau L.D., Lifshitz E.M., Electrodynamics of Contin- uous Media, Course of Theoretical Physics 8, Pergamon Press (1960)

    1960

  15. [23]

    Kovetz A., Electromagnetic theory, Oxford University Press (2000)

    2000

  16. [24]

    Miehe C., Rosato D., Kiefer B., Variational principles in dissipative electro-magneto-mechanics: A framework for the macro-modeling of functional materials, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng. 86, 1225–1276 (2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    , Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity

    Ball J.M. , Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity. Arch. Rat. Mech. Analysis 63, 337- 403 (1977)

    1977

  18. [26]

    Dorfmann L., Ogden R.W., Electroelastic plate instabil- ities based on the Stroh method in terms of the energy function Ω∗(F,DL), Mech. Res. Commun. (2019). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2019.03.002

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    , Zhao X

    Yang S. , Zhao X. , Sharma P., Avoiding the pull-in insta- bility of a dielectric elastomer film and the potential for increased actuation and energy harvesting. Soft Matter 13, 4552–4558 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    Ericksen J.L., Introduction to the Thermodynamics of Solids, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. (1998)

    1998

  21. [29]

    DeTommasi D., Puglisi G., Zurlo G., Compression- induced failure of electroactive polymeric thin films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 123507 (2011)

    2011

  22. [30]

    Suo Z., Theory of dielectric elastomers, Acta Mech. Sol. Sinica 23(6) 549–578 (2010)

    2010

  23. [31]

    , Suo Z., Method to analyze electromechanical stability of dielectric elastomers

    Zhao X. , Suo Z., Method to analyze electromechanical stability of dielectric elastomers.. Appl. Phys Lett. 91 (6), 061921 (2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    Fu Y., Dorfmann L., Xie Y., Localized necking of a dielec- tric membrane, Extr. Mech. Letters, 21, 44–48 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Arch.Rat.Mech

    DeSimone, A., Dolzmann, G., Macroscopic response of nematic elastomers via relaxation of a class of SO(3)- invariant energies. Arch.Rat.Mech. Anal. 161, 181–204 (2002)

    2002

  26. [34]

    DeTommasi D., Puglisi G., Zurlo G., Taut states of dielectric elastomer membranes, Int.J.NonLin.Mech 47, 8 355-361 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Su Y., Broderick H.C., Chen W., Destrade M., Wrinkles in soft dielectric plates., J Mech Phys Solids 119 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    Pipkin A.C., Continuously distributed wrinkles in fab- rics, Arch.Ration.Mech.Analysis 95, 93 (1986)

    1986

  29. [37]

    Pipkin A.C., The relaxed energy density for isotropic elastic membranes, IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics 36, 85-99 (1986)

    1986

  30. [38]

    This implies that the construction of the electroelastic energy should actually be confined to the regions (L, S, Uα), since for λα > λ′ 0 the energyψ is a de- creasing function

    for details. This implies that the construction of the electroelastic energy should actually be confined to the regions (L, S, Uα), since for λα > λ′ 0 the energyψ is a de- creasing function. Conclusively, the relaxed electroelastic energy can be constructed as ψ∗(λ1,λ 2) = /un...

  31. [39]

    Rational Mech

    Cesana P., Plucinsky P., Bhattacharya K., Effective Be- havior of Nematic Elastomer Membranes, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 218, 863–905 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    Load Transfer Via a Wrinkled Membrane, Proc.R.Soc.Lond.A 316.1525, 269–289 (1970)

    Mansfield E.H. Load Transfer Via a Wrinkled Membrane, Proc.R.Soc.Lond.A 316.1525, 269–289 (1970)

    1970

  33. [41]

    Pipkin A.C., Relaxed energy densities for large deforma- tions of membranes, IMA Journal of Applied Mathemat- ics 52, 297-308 (1994)

    1994

  34. [42]

    Pipkin A.C., Convexity Conditions for Strain- Dependent Energy Functions for Membranes, Arch.Rat.Mech.Analysis, 121, 361-376 (1993)

    1993

  35. [43]

    III/3, Springer, Berlin (1965)

    Truesdell C., Noll W., The Non-Linear Field Theories of Mechanics, Handbuch der Physik, Vol. III/3, Springer, Berlin (1965)

    1965

  36. [44]

    Destrade M., Righi M., private communications

  37. [45]

    Huang R., Suo Z., Electromechanical phase transitions in dielectric elastomers, Proc. R. Soc. A 468, 1014-1040 (2012)

    2012

  38. [46]

    , Suo Z., Electromechanical hysteresis and coexistent states in dielectric elastomers

    Zhao X., Hong W. , Suo Z., Electromechanical hysteresis and coexistent states in dielectric elastomers. Phys. Rev. B 76, 134113 (2007)

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.