Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Laplace Landmark Localization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1903.11633 v2 pith:OJC5TPVJ submitted 2019-03-27 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords landmarkconfidencedatafacialhighlandmarkslocalizationlocations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Landmark localization in images and videos is a classic problem solved in various ways. Nowadays, with deep networks prevailing throughout machine learning, there are revamped interests in pushing facial landmark detection technologies to handle more challenging data. Most efforts use network objectives based on L1 or L2 norms, which have several disadvantages. First of all, the locations of landmarks are determined from generated heatmaps (i.e., confidence maps) from which predicted landmark locations (i.e., the means) get penalized without accounting for the spread: a high scatter corresponds to low confidence and vice-versa. For this, we introduce a LaplaceKL objective that penalizes for a low confidence. Another issue is a dependency on labeled data, which are expensive to obtain and susceptible to error. To address both issues we propose an adversarial training framework that leverages unlabeled data to improve model performance. Our method claims state-of-the-art on all of the 300W benchmarks and ranks second-to-best on the Annotated Facial Landmarks in the Wild (AFLW) dataset. Furthermore, our model is robust with a reduced size: 1/8 the number of channels (i.e., 0.0398MB) is comparable to state-of-that-art in real-time on CPU. Thus, we show that our method is of high practical value to real-life application.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools