Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Taxonomy of Ambiguity Types for NLP

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.14072 v1 pith:OJEY4NLJ submitted 2024-03-21 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords ambiguitylanguagetypesdifferenttaxonomycommunicationabilitiesacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Ambiguity is an critical component of language that allows for more effective communication between speakers, but is often ignored in NLP. Recent work suggests that NLP systems may struggle to grasp certain elements of human language understanding because they may not handle ambiguities at the level that humans naturally do in communication. Additionally, different types of ambiguity may serve different purposes and require different approaches for resolution, and we aim to investigate how language models' abilities vary across types. We propose a taxonomy of ambiguity types as seen in English to facilitate NLP analysis. Our taxonomy can help make meaningful splits in language ambiguity data, allowing for more fine-grained assessments of both datasets and model performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Disagreement to Understanding: The Case for Ambiguity Detection in NLI

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper argues that NLI models should detect and classify content-based ambiguity before inference, treating disagreement as signal rather than noise.

  2. Position: Natural Language Should Not Fully Replace Formal Languages

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A 'specificity crossover' threshold, defined from information theory, marks where natural-language prompts lose efficiency to formal specification, supporting hybrid human-AI interfaces.

Pith tools