REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 51 references
Soliton foam formation in the early Universe
T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read Quantum fluctuations of light scalar fields during inflation can, without any thermal phase transition, produce local clusters of closed domain walls, domain walls bounded by cosmic strings, and scalar radiation.
desk verdict A plausible but numerically under-validated 3D demonstration of non-thermal soliton foam; the central claim is believable, but the paper needs a resolution study before its morphology can be trusted. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The argument is carried by a two-scalar-field action with potential $V(\phi,\chi)=\frac{m^2}{2}(\phi^2+\chi^2)+\Lambda^4\exp\bigl(-\frac{(\phi-\phi_0)^2+(\chi-\chi_0)^2}{2\sigma^2}\bigr)$, whose local peak and saddle point give the vacuum set the right topology: at scale $\Lambda$ an approximate U(1) symmetry yields cosmic strings, and at scale $m$ a unique vacuum yields domain walls, including closed bubbles and walls bounded by strings. Initial conditions are Gaussian random fields with power spectrum $P(k)\sim k^{-3}$, generated to mimic inflationary quantum fluctuations, and the fields are evolved on a 3D grid with finite differences and periodic boundary conditions, with a time-dependent Hubble parameter describing the end of inflation.
What would settle it
Run the same initial conditions with a halved spatial step and compare the reconnection events, hole formation, and foam morphology; if these change qualitatively, the claimed foam is a grid artifact.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The paper finds that in three-dimensional space the post-inflationary classical evolution of two scalar fields with realistic Gaussian initial conditions produces a composite structure it calls 'soliton foam': a local cluster of closed domain walls, domain walls bounded by cosmic strings, and scalar-field radiation. The foam appears in two morphologies depending on the initial field values relative to the potential's saddle point — a dense sponge-like interior and a sparser bubble-like exterior — so that a cluster is layered and gives way to vacuum. This is non-thermal: it requires no finite-temperature symmetry breaking, only inflationary quantum fluctuations of light scalar fields.
Load-bearing premise
The fixed numerical grid must resolve the soliton cores for the whole simulated time; the paper notes that the known wall-thickness collapse to grid scale does not occur in its short window but gives no resolution or convergence check.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- If the foam forms as described, topological defects need not be a global network; local clusters can coexist with observational bounds that rule out a Universe-filling wall network.
- Closed domain walls and string loops from the foam can collapse to primordial black holes, giving a mechanism for PBH clusters without a thermal transition.
- Radiation emitted by relaxing walls and decaying hole-bearing walls behaves like scalar particles that could constitute part of dark matter, alongside diffuse field oscillations and PBHs.
- The layered sponge-to-bubble-to-vacuum structure means the foam's cosmological signatures — gravitational waves, CMB distortions — would be localized rather than isotropic, so surveys should look for rare clustered sources.
- Scale invariance of inflationary fluctuations implies the same formation physics should produce a spectrum of cluster sizes and a corresponding dark-matter halo/PBH mass spectrum.
Reading between the lines
- A natural extension the paper leaves implicit: the same potential with a peak and saddle should form foam for a wide range of parameters, not just the single simulated set; scanning $\Lambda$, $\sigma$, and $m$ would show whether the morphology is generic.
- The authors do not report a resolution check; checking convergence at half the spatial step is a direct way to distinguish real solitons from grid artifacts.
- If the Gaussian ensemble is averaged over many realizations, the foam should show up in the two-point correlation of energy density as a clustered, non-Gaussian excess on scales set by the initial correlation length; that prediction is testable in future simulations.
- One could compute the probability that a random Hubble patch ends up in the sponge, bubble, or vacuum regions from the Gaussian distribution of initial field values, yielding an analytic mass function for the resulting PBH clusters.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper studies the formation of "soliton foam" from two scalar fields with a potential (Eq. 2) containing a local peak and a saddle point, using initial conditions generated as Gaussian random fields with a scale-free spectrum to mimic inflationary quantum fluctuations. The authors perform 3D finite-difference simulations and claim that the post-inflationary dynamics produce a local, layered cluster of closed domain walls, domain walls bounded by cosmic strings, and scalar-field radiation — a "soliton foam" — without any thermal phase transition. The paper illustrates qualitative effects (wall reconnection, hole formation, radiation emission, wall collapse) via energy-density slices and renderings, and discusses potential implications for dark matter and primordial black holes.
Significance. If correct, the paper offers a non-thermal route to local topological-defect clusters, contrasting with the standard global-network picture. The qualitative two-scale vacuum argument in Section 4 is physically coherent, and the presented energy-density frames are suggestive. The paper also ships an actual 3D simulation code and describes the numerical method in some detail. However, the central claim rests on visual inspection of a single fixed-grid run: there is no resolution or convergence study, no quantitative topological diagnostics, and a strong dependence on hand-picked potential and initial-condition parameters. The extrapolation to cosmological scales is asserted rather than demonstrated.
major comments (5)
- [Section 3, final paragraph] The manuscript acknowledges the known wall-thickness collapse to the grid scale but asserts it does not appear "due to the small time window" without reporting the wall width in grid units or performing resolution tests. Since the claimed foam morphology (reconnections, holes, collapsing walls) is described at the soliton-core scale, an under-resolved core could produce numerical artifacts that mimic these features. Please report the core width in grid units as a function of time and perform at least one convergence check (e.g., dx = 0.5 versus dx = 1) to confirm that the topology of the structures in Section 4 is stable.
- [Section 2.1, Eq. (8) and following text] The scale factor is defined as a(t) ≡ e^{H(t)t}, which is only correct for constant H. During the exit from inflation, H(t) varies, so the correct relation is a(t) = exp(∫ H dt). If the simulation implements the former expression, the expansion history is mis-modeled, which would directly affect the ∇²/a² gradient terms and the wall-thickness evolution that the paper relies on. Please clarify the actual expression used and, if necessary, correct the simulation or the text.
- [Section 4 and Figures 2–6, 8–9] The identification of "closed domain walls", "walls bounded by cosmic strings", and "holes" is made by visual inspection of energy-density slices, but no quantitative topological diagnostics are provided. Without a winding-number or phase-tracking analysis, the central claim that these composite defect structures form is not independently supported. Please add quantitative measures — for example, local winding numbers, defect-area/volume fractions, correlation lengths, and number densities of the various foam components — to substantiate the existence and evolution of the claimed structures.
- [Section 2.2] The initial conditions are described as "realistic", but they depend on several hand-picked choices: the exactly scale-free power spectrum (ns − 1 = 0), the dispersion set by ΔN = ln(L/Hinf^{-1}), and the arbitrary mean field values (φin, χin). The paper acknowledges in Section 4.5 that the foam structure depends on the initial field values, but it does not quantify the sensitivity to these parameters or justify them from a concrete inflationary model. Please either derive the initial conditions from a specific model of spectator-field fluctuations or present a parameter scan showing that foam formation is robust across the plausible parameter range.
- [Section 5] The statement that "the results of this paper can be extrapolated to arbitrary cosmological scales due to the scale invariance of inflationary quantum fluctuations" is not supported. The potential (2) contains explicit scales m and Λ, so the soliton core sizes and dynamics are not scale invariant; the flat power spectrum applies to the initial conditions, not to the subsequent field evolution. The simulation box (L ~ 10²–10³ Hinf^{-1}) cannot be scaled to cosmological sizes without demonstrating self-similarity of the foam. Please temper this extrapolation claim or provide evidence that the foam morphology is scale-free over multiple box sizes.
minor comments (6)
- [Eq. (5)] The second equation of motion contains a typo: the kinetic term is written as (∇² φ)/a², but it should be (∇² χ)/a².
- [Section 3] The phrase "The computations are arithmetically intensive" is awkward; consider "computationally intensive".
- [Figure captions (Figs. 1, 8, 9)] The notation for the simulation size, e.g., "L3 = 3503 · 1003" and "L3 = 9003 · 1003", is ambiguous. Please clarify whether these mean 350^3 × 10^3, 900^3 × 10^3, or something else.
- [Section 2.2] The sentence "We have no reason to assume that the spectrum tilt for this scalar field be significant" should read "is significant".
- [Section 3] The cyclic boundary conditions are mentioned, but there is no discussion of how boundary effects might influence the foam structures near the edges of the box. A brief statement on how far the results are from the boundaries would be useful.
- [Section 4.3] The claim that radiation emission "can be interpreted as particles" would benefit from a brief explanation of how the wave packets are identified as particles in the simulation, e.g., by matching the dispersion relation.
Circularity Check
Self-citations supply the model input and mechanism labels, but the central soliton-foam morphology is read directly from the simulation, so no derivation reduces by construction to its inputs.
full rationale
The paper's derivation chain is: (i) adopt a two-field potential with a peak and a saddle, taken from the authors' earlier work [31-33]; (ii) generate Gaussian inflationary initial conditions with a scale-free power spectrum; (iii) evolve the fields numerically on a fixed grid; (iv) observe a 3D 'soliton foam' of closed domain walls, walls bounded by strings, and radiation. The claimed central result, the foam morphology and its layered sponge/bubble structure, is not obtained by fitting any parameter to that result; it is a direct output of the finite-difference evolution. The potential and the statement that strings form first at scale Lambda and walls at scale m are indeed imported from the same group's previous papers, but these are model inputs and mechanism expectations, not the paper's new predictive claim. The statement that 'the edges of these holes become closed strings [32]' is also a self-citation, but the paper immediately shows holes with string-rimmed edges in its own 3D simulation (Figure 3), so the simulation independently exhibits the effect. Dark-matter and primordial-black-hole estimates are explicitly postponed to future work, so no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. The grid-resolution caveat in Section 3 (wall thickness decreasing to the grid scale, deferred by the 'small time window') is a numerical correctness risk but not a circularity: an under-resolved simulation could produce artifacts, but that is not a reduction of the result to its own inputs. Overall, there are several minor self-citations that carry the model and mechanism, but the central derivation is self-contained numerical dynamics, giving a low circularity score.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (5)
- Lambda (potential peak amplitude) =
0.2 (in H_inf units)
- sigma (Gaussian peak width) =
1 (in H_inf units)
- m (field mass) =
0.001 (in H_inf units)
- phi0, chi0 (peak coordinates) =
phi0=0, chi0=5 (in H_inf units)
- average initial field values <phi>, <chi> (phi_in, chi_in) =
e.g., phi_in=0, chi_in=6 in Figure 1; varied in Section 4.5
assumptions (7)
- standard math Gaussian statistics (Wick's theorem) describe inflationary quantum fluctuations of free scalar fields (Eqs. 9-12).
- domain assumption The scalar fields are effectively massless during inflation, V'' << H_inf^2, so each e-fold contributes dispersion H_inf/(2*pi).
- domain assumption The power spectrum of the spectator-field fluctuations is scale-free, ns-1 = 0, so P(k) ~ k^-3.
- ad hoc to paper The two-field potential (2), with one Gaussian peak and one saddle, represents a wide class of models that can produce strings and walls.
- domain assumption Backreaction of the field system on the cosmological expansion is negligible; the scale factor follows the pure Starobinsky background.
- ad hoc to paper The fixed grid resolves soliton cores during the simulated time; the known wall-thickness collapse to grid scale does not occur.
- ad hoc to paper Results from a small box can be scaled to cosmological sizes due to the scale invariance of inflationary fluctuations.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Soliton foam formation in the early Universe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OJTNTINO
@misc{pith2026241218997,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Soliton foam formation in the early Universe},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OJTNTINO}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.18997}
}
read the original abstract
The formation of composite solitons produced by scalar fields without thermal phase transitions in the early Universe is considered. We present numerical simulations of the formation and evolution of soliton structures at the post-inflationary stage. The realistic initial conditions are obtained through the simulation of multiple quantum fluctuations during the inflation epoch. The initial field distributions allow to form local soliton clusters in the early Universe without the need for the thermal production of a soliton network throughout the Universe. We find that in three-dimensional space, the nontrivial composite field structures are formed in the form of <<soliton foam>>, consisting of closed domain walls, domain walls bounded by cosmic strings, and scalar field radiation. The possible cosmological implications of the soliton foam are discussed.
Figures
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Cosmological con- sequences of a spontaneous breakdown of a discrete symmetry
I. B. Zeldovich, I. I. Kobzarev, and L. B. Okun, “Cosmological con- sequences of a spontaneous breakdown of a discrete symmetry”, Sov. Phys. JETP 67, 3–11 (1975)
work page 1975
-
[2]
Topology of cosmic domains and strings
T. W. B. Kibble, “Topology of cosmic domains and strings”, J. Phys. A 9, 1387–1398 (1976)
work page 1976
-
[3]
Some implications of a cosmological phase transi- tion
T. W. B. Kibble, “Some implications of a cosmological phase transi- tion”, Phys. Rep.67, 183–199 (1980)
work page 1980
-
[4]
Cosmic strings and domain walls
A. Vilenkin, “Cosmic strings and domain walls”, Phys. Rep.121, 263– 315 (1985)
work page 1985
-
[5]
Evolution of cosmic string networks
A. Albrecht and N. Turok, “Evolution of cosmic string networks”, Phys. Rev. D40, 973–1001 (1989)
work page 1989
-
[6]
Dynamical Evolution of Domain Walls in an Expanding Universe
W. H. Press, B. S. Ryden, and D. N. Spergel, “Dynamical Evolution of Domain Walls in an Expanding Universe”, Astrophys. J.347, 590 (1989)
work page 1989
-
[7]
Cosmological structure formation from soft topological defects
C. T. Hill, D. N. Schramm, and J. N. Fry, “Cosmological structure formation from soft topological defects”, Comments Nucl. Part. Phys. 19, 25–39 (1989)
work page 1989
-
[8]
Structure formation from unstable domain walls
S. Lola and G. G. Ross, “Structure formation from unstable domain walls”, Nucl. Phys. B406, 452–470 (1993)
work page 1993
Show all 51 references
-
[9]
Cosmic strings
M. B. Hindmarsh and T. W. B. Kibble, “Cosmic strings”, Rep. Prog. Phys. 58, 477–562 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9411342 [hep-ph]
1995 arXiv
-
[10]
Evolutionofanon-Abeliancosmicstringnetwork
P.McGraw,“Evolutionofanon-Abeliancosmicstringnetwork”,Phys. Rev. D 57, 3317–3339 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9706182 [astro-ph]
1998 arXiv
-
[11]
Domain walls as dark energy
A. Friedland, H. Murayama, and M. Perelstein, “Domain walls as dark energy”, Phys. Rev. D67, 043519, 043519 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/ 0205520 [astro-ph]
2003
-
[12]
Detailed study of defect models for cosmic structure formation
A. Albrecht, R. A. Battye, and J. Robinson, “Detailed study of defect models for cosmic structure formation”, Phys. Rev. D 59, 023508, 023508 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9711121 [astro-ph]. 21
1998 arXiv
-
[13]
Cosmic structure formation with topological defects
R. Durrer, M. Kunz, and A. Melchiorri, “Cosmic structure formation with topological defects”, Phys. Rep.364, 1–81 (2002), arXiv:astro- ph/0110348 [astro-ph]
2002
-
[14]
Are domain walls ruled out?
L. Conversi et al., “Are domain walls ruled out?”, Astropart. Phys. 21, 443–449 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0402529 [astro-ph]
2004 arXiv
-
[15]
Boundsoncosmicstrings from WMAP and SDSS
M.Wyman,L.Pogosian,andI.Wasserman,“Boundsoncosmicstrings from WMAP and SDSS”, Phys. Rev. D72, 023513, 023513 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0503364 [astro-ph]
2005 arXiv
-
[16]
Constraints on Cosmic Strings fromtheLIGO-VirgoGravitational-WaveDetectors
LIGO Scientific Collaboration et al., “Constraints on Cosmic Strings fromtheLIGO-VirgoGravitational-WaveDetectors”,Phys.Rev.Lett. 112, 131101, 131101 (2014), arXiv:1310.2384 [gr-qc]
2014 arXiv
-
[17]
Big-bang nucleosynthesis and gamma-ray constraints on cosmic strings with a large Higgs con- densate
H. F. Santana Mota and M. Hindmarsh, “Big-bang nucleosynthesis and gamma-ray constraints on cosmic strings with a large Higgs con- densate”, Phys. Rev. D91, 043001, 043001 (2015), arXiv:1407.3599 [hep-ph]
2015 arXiv
-
[18]
Multi-messengerconstraintsonAbelian- Higgs cosmic string networks
M.HindmarshandJ.Kume,“Multi-messengerconstraintsonAbelian- Higgs cosmic string networks”, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2023, 045, 045 (2023), arXiv:2210.06178 [astro-ph.CO]
2023 arXiv
-
[19]
Primordial Black Holes from Non-Equilibrium Second Order Phase Transition
S. G. Rubin, M. Y. Khlopov, and A. S. Sakharov, “Primordial Black Holes from Non-Equilibrium Second Order Phase Transition”, Grav. Cosmol. S 6, 51–58 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0005271
2000 arXiv
-
[20]
The Formation of Primary Galactic Nuclei during Phase Transitions in the Early Universe
S. G. Rubin, A. S. Sakharov, and M. Y. Khlopov, “The Formation of Primary Galactic Nuclei during Phase Transitions in the Early Universe”, J. Exp. Theor. Phys.92, 921–929 (2001), arXiv:0106187 [hep-ph]
2001
-
[21]
Black holes from cosmic strings
S. W. Hawking, “Black holes from cosmic strings”, Phys. Lett. B231, 237–239 (1989)
1989
-
[22]
Formation of primordial black holes by cosmic strings
A. Polnarev and R. Zembowicz, “Formation of primordial black holes by cosmic strings”, Phys. Rev. D43, 1106–1109 (1991)
1991
-
[23]
Formationofblackholesfromcollapsed cosmic string loops
R.R.CaldwellandP.Casper,“Formationofblackholesfromcollapsed cosmic string loops”, Phys. Rev. D53, 3002–3010 (1996), arXiv:gr- qc/9509012 [astro-ph]
1996
-
[24]
Cosmic strings and primor- dial black holes
A. Vilenkin, Y. Levin, and A. Gruzinov, “Cosmic strings and primor- dial black holes”, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2018, 008, 008 (2018), arXiv:1808.00670 [astro-ph.CO]
2018 arXiv
-
[25]
Primordial black holes from cosmic domain walls
J. Liu, Z.-K. Guo, and R.-G. Cai, “Primordial black holes from cosmic domain walls”, Phys. Rev. D101, 023513, 023513 (2020), arXiv:1908. 02662 [astro-ph.CO]. 22
2020
-
[26]
Primordial struc- ture of massive black hole clusters
M. Y. Khlopov, S. G. Rubin, and A. S. Sakharov, “Primordial struc- ture of massive black hole clusters”, Astropart. Phys. 23, 265–277 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0401532 [astro-ph]
2005 arXiv
-
[27]
Quasars for- mation around clusters of primordial black holes
V. I. Dokuchaev, Y. N. Eroshenko, and S. G. Rubin, “Quasars for- mation around clusters of primordial black holes”, Grav. Cosmol.11, 99–104 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0412418 [astro-ph]
2005 arXiv
-
[28]
Early formation of galaxies induced by clusters of black holes
V. I. Dokuchaev, Y. N. Eroshenko, and S. G. Rubin, “Early formation of galaxies induced by clusters of black holes”, Astron. Rep.52, 779– 789 (2008), arXiv:0801.0885 [astro-ph]
2008 arXiv
-
[29]
Clusters of Primordial Black Holes
K. M. Belotsky et al., “Clusters of Primordial Black Holes”, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 246, 246 (2019), arXiv:1807.06590 [astro-ph.CO]
2019 arXiv
-
[30]
A new type of isotropic cosmological models with- out singularity
A. A. Starobinsky, “A new type of isotropic cosmological models with- out singularity”, Phys. Lett. B91, 99–102 (1980)
1980
-
[31]
Classical transitions with the topological number changing in the early Universe
V. A. Gani, A. A. Kirillov, and S. G. Rubin, “Classical transitions with the topological number changing in the early Universe”, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2018, 042, 042 (2018), arXiv:1704.03688 [hep-th]
2018 arXiv
-
[32]
Cosmological For- mationof(2+1)-DimensionalSolitonStructuresinModelsPossessing Potentials with Local Peaks
B. S. Murygin, A. A. Kirillov, and V. V. Nikulin, “Cosmological For- mationof(2+1)-DimensionalSolitonStructuresinModelsPossessing Potentials with Local Peaks”, Physics3, 563–568 (2021), arXiv:2109. 03271 [hep-th]
2021
-
[33]
Domain walls and strings formation in the early Universe
A. A. Kirillov and B. S. Murygin, “Domain walls and strings formation in the early Universe”, Bled Workshop in Physics21, 128–133 (2020), arXiv:2011.07041 [hep-th]
2020 arXiv
-
[34]
Planck 2018 results. VII. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB
Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami, and et al., “Planck 2018 results. VII. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB”, Astron. & Astrophys.641, A7, A7 (2020), arXiv:1906.02552 [astro-ph.CO]
2020 arXiv
-
[35]
Scalar field fluctuations in the expanding universe and the new inflationary universe scenario
A. D. Linde, “Scalar field fluctuations in the expanding universe and the new inflationary universe scenario”, Phys. Lett. B116, 335–339 (1982)
1982
-
[36]
A. D. Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology, Vol. 5 (CRC press, 1990), arXiv:hep-th/0503203 [astro-ph]
1990 arXiv
-
[37]
Accelerating high-order stencils GPUs
R. Sai et al., “Accelerating high-order stencils GPUs”, in Performance modeling, benchmarking and simulation of high performance com- puter systems (PMBS) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 86–108, arXiv:2009.04619
2020 arXiv
-
[38]
Extreme-scale high-order weno simulations of 3-d deto- nation wave with 10 million cores
Y. Cai et al., “Extreme-scale high-order weno simulations of 3-d deto- nation wave with 10 million cores”, ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization (TACO)15, 1–21 (2018). 23
2018
-
[39]
Vilenkin and E
A. Vilenkin and E. Shellard,Cosmic strings and other topological de- fects (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000)
2000
-
[40]
Walls bounded by strings
T. W. B. Kibble, G. Lazarides, and Q. Shafi, “Walls bounded by strings”, Phys. Rev. D26, 435–439 (1982)
1982
-
[41]
Radiation from vac- uum strings and domain walls
T. Vachaspati, A. E. Everett, and A. Vilenkin, “Radiation from vac- uum strings and domain walls”, Phys. Rev. D30, 2046–2053 (1984)
1984
-
[42]
On the decay of cosmic string loops
R. H. Brandenberger, “On the decay of cosmic string loops”, Nucl. Phys. B 293, 812–828 (1987)
1987
-
[43]
Nongravitational decay of cosmic strings
M. Srednicki and S. Theisen, “Nongravitational decay of cosmic strings”, Phys. Lett. B189, 397–400 (1987)
1987
-
[44]
Collapse of nearly spherical domain walls
L. M. Widrow, “Collapse of nearly spherical domain walls”, Phys. Rev. D 39, 3576–3578 (1989)
1989
-
[45]
Production of dark matter axions from collapse of string-wall systems
T. Hiramatsu et al., “Production of dark matter axions from collapse of string-wall systems”, Phys. Rev. D85, 105020 (2012), arXiv:1202. 5851 [hep-ph]
2012
-
[46]
Dark matter from decay- ing topological defects
M. Hindmarsh, R. Kirk, and S. M. West, “Dark matter from decay- ing topological defects”, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2014, 037, 037 (2014), arXiv:1311.1637 [hep-ph]
2014 arXiv
-
[47]
Black holes from nucleating strings
J. Garriga and A. Vilenkin, “Black holes from nucleating strings”, Phys. Rev. D47, 3265–3274 (1993), arXiv:9208212 [hep-ph]
1993
-
[48]
CosmicStringLoops CollapsingtoBlackHoles
R.N.Hansen,M.Christensen,andA.L.Larsen,“CosmicStringLoops CollapsingtoBlackHoles”,Int.J.Mod.Phys.A 15,4433–4445(2000), arXiv:9902048 [gr-qc]
2000
-
[49]
Cosmic string loop collapse in full general relativity
T. Helfer, J. C. Aurrekoetxea, and E. A. Lim, “Cosmic string loop collapse in full general relativity”, Phys. Rev. D99, 104028 (2019), arXiv:1808.06678 [gr-qc]
2019 arXiv
-
[50]
Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Re- cent Developments
B. Carr and F. Kühnel, “Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Re- cent Developments”, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70, 355–394 (2020), arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO]
2020 arXiv
-
[51]
Constraints on primordial black holes
B. Carr et al., “Constraints on primordial black holes”, Rep. Prog. Phys. 84, 116902 (2021), arXiv:2002.12778 [astro-ph.CO]. 24
2021 arXiv
Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.