pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19110 · v1 · pith:OL7MZCILnew · submitted 2026-04-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.str-el

Controlling Quantum Materials by Growth: Thermodynamics, Kinetics, and Defect Engineering in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides

Anzar Ali , Md Ezaz Hasan Khan , Mahmoud Abdel-Hafiez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 02:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el
keywords transition metal dichalcogenidescrystal growththermodynamicskineticsdefect engineeringphase stabilityquantum phasesthin films
0
0 comments X

The pith

Crystal growth establishes the defect and phase landscape that sets the electronic states realized in transition metal dichalcogenides.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review argues that crystal growth functions as a thermodynamic boundary condition in transition metal dichalcogenides rather than a mere preparation step. It develops a unified framework of thermodynamic and kinetic principles to connect growth variables such as chemical potentials, supersaturation, and mass transport to phase stability, defect populations, polytype selection, and resulting microstructures. The central point is that these growth-determined features directly shape collective electronic behaviors including charge-density waves, superconductivity, band topology, and correlation effects. A reader would care because the framework places bulk and thin-film methods on a common map, showing how distinct synthesis regimes produce characteristic disorder profiles and thereby control the effective electronic Hamiltonian.

Core claim

Synthesis determines the structural and defect landscape from which collective electronic behavior emerges, establishing crystal growth as a central parameter in determining the effective electronic Hamiltonian realized in experiment.

What carries the argument

A unified thermodynamic and kinetic framework that maps growth conditions to phase stability, defect energetics, and microstructure across bulk and thin-film methods.

If this is right

  • Chemical potential constraints during growth define stability windows for polytypes and metastable phases with distinct electronic properties.
  • Supersaturation and mass-transport regimes determine nucleation, morphology, and the resulting defect populations that influence charge-density-wave order and superconductivity.
  • Nonequilibrium pathways enable kinetic trapping of specific polymorphs whose band topology or correlation effects differ from equilibrium phases.
  • Linking synthesis variables explicitly to emergent phenomena provides a route to improved reproducibility in quantum material experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Models of electronic structure in these materials would need to treat growth-derived defect densities as input parameters instead of assuming ideal lattices.
  • Device fabrication sequences could incorporate real-time monitoring of growth parameters to target specific quantum phases rather than relying on post-growth tuning.
  • The same framework might extend to predict how growth controls emergent behavior in other layered van der Waals systems beyond dichalcogenides.

Load-bearing premise

Thermodynamic and kinetic principles apply uniformly across synthesis methods to predict electronic states without needing extra material-specific microscopic details or post-growth characterization.

What would settle it

If two samples grown under nominally identical chemical potential and supersaturation conditions but by different methods exhibit measurably different defect densities or electronic transition temperatures, the direct mapping from growth regime to electronic Hamiltonian would fail.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19110 by Anzar Ali, Mahmoud Abdel-Hafiez, Md Ezaz Hasan Khan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic comparison of nucleation rate as a func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Schematic time–temperature–transformation (TTT) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Schematic illustration of Fermi-level shifts induced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Transition metal dichalcogenides exhibit a wide range of semiconducting, metallic, correlated, and topological electronic states that arise from strong coupling between lattice structure, dimensionality, and electronic degrees of freedom. In these materials, crystal growth is not merely a preparative step but a thermodynamic boundary condition that establishes chemical potentials, defect populations, polytype stability, and access to metastable phases. As a result, synthesis determines the structural and defect landscape from which collective electronic behavior emerges. In this Review, we develop a unified thermodynamic and kinetic framework that connects growth conditions to phase stability, defect energetics, and microstructure. We examine how chemical potential constraints define stability windows, how supersaturation and mass-transport regimes govern nucleation and morphology, and how nonequilibrium pathways enable kinetic trapping and polymorph selection. Bulk and thin-film synthesis approaches, including chemical vapor transport, flux growth, physical vapor transport, solvent-assisted crystallization, chemical vapor deposition, and molecular beam epitaxy, are placed within a common thermodynamic and kinetic map to clarify how distinct growth regimes produce characteristic disorder profiles and structural phases. By explicitly linking synthesis variables to charge-density-wave order, superconductivity, band topology, and correlation effects, this Review establishes crystal growth as a central parameter in determining the effective electronic Hamiltonian realized in experiment. This perspective provides a physically grounded framework for improving reproducibility and guiding deterministic control of emergent quantum phases in layered materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review that develops a unified thermodynamic and kinetic framework for TMD crystal growth. It argues that synthesis methods (CVT, flux, PVT, CVD, MBE) establish chemical potentials, supersaturation, defect populations, polytype stability, and access to metastable phases, thereby determining the structural landscape from which collective electronic states (CDW order, superconductivity, band topology, correlations) emerge. Growth conditions are placed on a shared chemical-potential/supersaturation diagram that is claimed to govern nucleation, morphology, disorder profiles, and the effective electronic Hamiltonian.

Significance. If the central mapping holds, the review would be significant for the field: it reframes crystal growth as an active control knob rather than a preparatory step, synthesizes broad prior literature on thermodynamics/kinetics in TMDs, and offers a physically grounded route to improved reproducibility and deterministic engineering of quantum phases. The absence of ad-hoc parameters or self-referential derivations in the presented framework is a strength for a review of this scope.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sections describing the common thermodynamic/kinetic map and thin-film synthesis] The core claim that a single chemical-potential and supersaturation diagram suffices to determine defect energetics, polytype stability, and electronic order across bulk and thin-film methods (including MBE and CVD) is load-bearing. The manuscript does not specify how substrate-induced strain, flux impurities, or surface kinetics—which routinely shift formation energies by hundreds of meV in thin films—are folded into the common map or whether they can be neglected while still predicting CDW or superconducting states. This requires either explicit incorporation rules or concrete examples showing when the general constraints alone are predictive.
  2. [Discussion linking synthesis to charge-density-wave order, superconductivity, and correlation effects] The linkage from growth variables to specific electronic phenomena (e.g., how supersaturation regimes select polytypes that stabilize CDW order or suppress superconductivity) is asserted but would benefit from at least one quantitative case study in which the framework reproduces an experimentally observed phase boundary or defect concentration without additional material-specific microscopic inputs.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Framework introduction] Notation for chemical potentials and supersaturation should be defined consistently in a single early section or table to avoid ambiguity when comparing bulk vs. thin-film regimes.
  2. [Figures illustrating growth regimes] A few figure captions could more explicitly tie the plotted stability windows or nucleation barriers back to the electronic Hamiltonian parameters discussed in the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their insightful comments, which help to clarify the scope and limitations of our proposed framework. We address the two major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Sections describing the common thermodynamic/kinetic map and thin-film synthesis] The core claim that a single chemical-potential and supersaturation diagram suffices to determine defect energetics, polytype stability, and electronic order across bulk and thin-film methods (including MBE and CVD) is load-bearing. The manuscript does not specify how substrate-induced strain, flux impurities, or surface kinetics—which routinely shift formation energies by hundreds of meV in thin films—are folded into the common map or whether they can be neglected while still predicting CDW or superconducting states. This requires either explicit incorporation rules or concrete examples showing when the general constraints alone are predictive.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original manuscript could more explicitly describe the incorporation of thin-film effects into the common thermodynamic map. In the revised manuscript, we have added a new paragraph in the thin-film synthesis section explaining that substrate strain can be incorporated as an effective modification to the chemical potential of the constituent elements or as an additional term in the formation energy of defects and polytypes. Surface kinetics are accounted for through adjustments to the supersaturation and mass transport rates. We provide examples from the literature on MBE-grown TMDs where neglecting strain leads to incorrect polytype predictions, while including it as a boundary condition aligns with observed phases. However, we emphasize that for quantitative prediction of electronic states like CDW order, material-specific calculations remain necessary on top of these boundary conditions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion linking synthesis to charge-density-wave order, superconductivity, and correlation effects] The linkage from growth variables to specific electronic phenomena (e.g., how supersaturation regimes select polytypes that stabilize CDW order or suppress superconductivity) is asserted but would benefit from at least one quantitative case study in which the framework reproduces an experimentally observed phase boundary or defect concentration without additional material-specific microscopic inputs.

    Authors: The manuscript synthesizes existing literature to show correlations between growth conditions and electronic properties, but we agree that a fully self-contained quantitative example without any material-specific inputs would strengthen the presentation. Unfortunately, the thermodynamic framework sets the accessible structural and defect landscape but does not itself compute the electronic Hamiltonian or phase boundaries, which require microscopic theory or experiment. We have revised the discussion section to more clearly delineate what the framework predicts (e.g., defect concentrations and polytype stability windows) versus what requires additional inputs (e.g., exact CDW transition temperatures). No new quantitative case study is added, as it would necessitate new computations outside the scope of this review. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review synthesizes literature without self-referential derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

This is a review article that unifies existing thermodynamic and kinetic concepts from prior TMD literature into a conceptual map linking growth conditions to defect profiles and electronic phases. No original equations, parameter fits, or quantitative predictions are presented that could reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. Claims rest on broad external citations rather than self-citation chains or ansatzes smuggled from the authors' prior work. The framework is interpretive and does not contain load-bearing steps that are equivalent to their inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review relies on standard thermodynamic and kinetic principles drawn from prior literature without introducing new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Thermodynamic equilibrium and chemical-potential constraints govern phase stability and equilibrium defect concentrations.
    Invoked to define stability windows for polytypes and defects.
  • domain assumption Kinetic factors such as supersaturation and mass transport can trap metastable phases and control microstructure.
    Used to explain nonequilibrium pathways and polymorph selection.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5563 in / 1286 out tokens · 42415 ms · 2026-05-10T02:50:15.318611+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Manzeli, D

    S. Manzeli, D. Ovchinnikov, D. Pasquier, O. V. Yazyev, and A. Kis, 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenides, Nat. Rev. Mater.2, 17033 (2017)

    2017

  2. [2]

    J. A. Wilson, F. J. Di Salvo, and S. Mahajan, Charge- Density Waves and Superlattices in Metallic Layered Transition Metal Dichalcogenides, Adv. Phys.24, 117 (1975)

    1975

  3. [3]

    K. F. Mak, C. Lee, J. Hone, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Atomically Thin MoS2: A New Direct-Gap Semiconduc- tor, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 136805 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    Splendiani, L

    A. Splendiani, L. Sun, Y. Zhang, T. Li, J. Kim, G. Galli, and F. Wang, Emerging Photoluminescence in Monolayer MoS2, Nano Lett.10, 1271 (2010)

    2010

  5. [5]

    D. E. Moncton, J. D. Axe, and F. J. DiSalvo, Study of superlattice formation in 2H-NbSe 2 and 2H-TaSe 2 by neutron scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.34, 734 (1975)

    1975

  6. [6]

    F. J. Di Salvo, D. E. Moncton, and J. V. Waszczak, Electronic properties and superlattice formation in the semimetal TiSe2, Phys. Rev. B14, 4321 (1976)

    1976

  7. [7]

    Fazekas and E

    P. Fazekas and E. Tosatti, Electrical, structural and mag- netic properties of pure and doped 1T-TaS 2, Philosophi- cal Magazine B39, 229 (1979)

    1979

  8. [8]

    M. N. Ali, J. Xiong, S. Flynn, J. Tao, Q. D. Gib- son, L. M. Schoop, T. Liang, N. Haldolaarachchige, M. Hirschberger, N. P. Ong, and R. J. Cava, Large, Non- Saturating Magnetoresistance in WTe2, Nature514, 205 (2014)

    2014

  9. [9]

    X. Qian, J. Liu, L. Fu, and J. Li, Quantum spin Hall ef- fect in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Science346, 1344 (2014)

    2014

  10. [10]

    A. A. Soluyanov, D. Gresch, Z. Wang, Q. Wu, M. Troyer, X. Dai, and B. A. Bernevig, Type-II Weyl semimetals, Nature527, 495 (2015)

    2015

  11. [11]

    H. Chen, J. Zhang, D. Kan, J. He, M. Song, J. Pang, S. Wei, and K. Chen, The Recent Progress of Two- Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides and Their Phase Transition, Crystals12, 1381 (2022)

    2022

  12. [12]

    S. B. Zhang and J. E. Northrup, Chemical potential de- pendence of defect formation energies in GaAs: Appli- cation to Ga self-diffusion, Physical Review Letters67, 2339 (1991)

    1991

  13. [13]

    C. G. Van de Walle and J. Neugebauer, First-principles calculations for defects and impurities: Applications to III-nitrides, Journal of Applied Physics95, 3851 (2004)

    2004

  14. [14]

    Komsa and A

    H.-P. Komsa and A. V. Krasheninnikov, Native defects in bulk and monolayer MoS 2 from first principles, Physical Review B91, 125304 (2015)

    2015

  15. [15]

    J. Hong, Z. Hu, M. Probert, K. Li, D. Lv, X. Yang, L. Gu, N. Mao, Q. Feng, L. Xie, J. Zhang, D. Wu, Z. Zhang, C. Jin, W. Ji, X. Zhang, J. Yuan, and Z. Zhang, Explor- ing Atomic Defects in Molybdenum Disulphide Monolay- ers, Nat. Commun.6, 6293 (2015), for thermodynamics of chalcogen vacancy formation and control

    2015

  16. [16]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films, Science306, 666 (2004)

    2004

  17. [17]

    Lee, X.-Q

    Y.-H. Lee, X.-Q. Zhang, W. Zhang, M.-T. Chang, C.- T. Lin, K.-D. Chang, Y.-C. Yu, J. T.-W. Wang, C.-S. Chang, L.-J. Li, and T.-W. Lin, Synthesis of Large-Area MoS2 Atomic Layers with Chemical Vapor Deposition, Adv. Mater.24, 2320 (2012)

    2012

  18. [18]

    M. M. Ugeda, A. J. Bradley, S.-F. Shi, F. H. da Jornada, Y. Zhang, D. Y. Qiu, W. Ruan, S.-K. Mo, Z. Hussain, Z.-X. Shen, F. Wang, S. G. Louie, and M. F. Crommie, Giant bandgap renormalization and excitonic effects in a monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide semiconduc- tor, Nature Materials13, 1091 (2014)

    2014

  19. [19]

    P. Y. Huang, C. S. Ruiz-Vargas, A. M. van der Zande, W. S. Whitney, M. P. Levendorf, J. W. Kevek, S. Garg, J. S. Alden, C. J. Hustedt, Y. Zhu, J. Park, P. L. McEuen, and D. A. Muller, Grains and grain boundaries in single- layer graphene atomic patchwork quilts, Nature469, 389 (2011)

    2011

  20. [20]

    Lin, H.-P

    Y.-C. Lin, H.-P. Komsa, C.-H. Yeh, T. Bj¨ orkman, Z.- Y. Liang, C.-H. Ho, Y.-S. Huang, P.-W. Chiu, A. V. Krasheninnikov, and K. Suenaga, Single-layer ReS 2: Two-dimensional semiconductor with tunable electronic properties controlled by defects, ACS Nano9, 11249 (2015)

    2015

  21. [21]

    Kashchiev, Equilibrium, inNucleation(Butterworth- Heinemann, Oxford, 2000) Chap

    D. Kashchiev, Equilibrium, inNucleation(Butterworth- Heinemann, Oxford, 2000) Chap. 12, pp. 178–183

    2000

  22. [22]

    R. B. Bird, W. E. Stewart, and E. N. Lightfoot,Transport Phenomena, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2002)

    2002

  23. [23]

    W. K. Burton, N. Cabrera, and F. C. Frank, The Growth of Crystals and the Equilibrium Structure of Their Sur- faces, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A243, 299 (1951)

    1951

  24. [24]

    Binnewies, M

    M. Binnewies, M. Schmidt, and P. Schmidt, Chemical Vapor Transport Reactions – Arguments for Choosing a Suitable Transport Agent, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.643, 1295 (2017)

    2017

  25. [25]

    P. C. Canfield and Z. Fisk, Growth of single crystals from metallic fluxes, Philosophical Magazine B65, 1117 (1992). 19

    1992

  26. [26]

    Rudolph,Handbook of Crystal Growth, 2nd ed

    P. Rudolph,Handbook of Crystal Growth, 2nd ed. (Else- vier, 2003)

    2003

  27. [27]

    R. Lv, J. A. Robinson, R. E. Schaak, D. Sun, Y. Sun, T. E. Mallouk, and M. Terrones, Transition Metal Dichalcogenides and Beyond: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications of Single- and Few-Layer Nanosheets, Acc. Chem. Res.48, 56 (2015)

    2015

  28. [28]

    Y. Je, E. Kim, N. V. Binh, H. Kim, S.-y. Cho, D.-H. Lee, M. J. Kwon, M. Choi, J. H. Lee, W. H. Nam, Y. Lee, J. Y. Cho, and J. H. Park, Analysis of Physical and Electrical Properties of NiTe2 Single Crystal Grown via Molten Salt Flux Method, Electron. Mater. Lett.19, 452 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    Lazarevi´ c, M

    N. Lazarevi´ c, M. M. Radonji´ c, R. Hu, D. Tanaskovi´ c, C. Petrovic, and Z. V. Popovi´ c, Phonon Properties of CoSb2 Single Crystals, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter24, 135402 (2012)

    2012

  30. [30]

    Nagao, A

    M. Nagao, A. Miura, Y. Maruyama, S. Watauchi, Y. Takano, and I. Tanaka, Cd Additive Effect on Self- Flux Growth of Cs-Intercalated NbS 2 Superconducting Single Crystals, Z. Naturforsch. B76, 739 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    X. D. Zhu, Y. P. Sun, S. B. Zhang, H. C. Lei, L. J. Li, X. B. Zhu, Z. R. Yang, W. H. Song, and J. M. Dai, Super- conductivity and Single Crystal Growth of Ni 0.05TaS2, Solid State Commun.149, 1296 (2009)

    2009

  32. [32]

    Colell, N

    H. Colell, N. Alonso-Vante, S. Fiechter, R. Schieck, K. Diesner, W. Henrion, and H. Tributsch, Crystal growth and properties of novel ternary transition metal chalcogenide compounds [IrxRu1−xS2 (0.005< x <0.5)], Mater. Res. Bull.29, 1065 (1994)

    1994

  33. [33]

    P. C. Canfield, T. Kong, U. S. Kaluarachchi, and N. H. Jo, Use of Frit-Disc Crucibles for Routine and Ex- ploratory Solution Growth of Single Crystalline Samples, Philos. Mag.96, 84 (2016)

    2016

  34. [34]

    Zhang and X

    Q. Zhang and X. Wang, Preparation and Crystal Growth of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.646, 1047 (2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    D. A. Chareev, P. V. Evstigneeva, D. Phuyal, G. Man, H. Rensmo, A. N. Vasiliev, and M. Abdel-Hafiez, Growth of Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides by Solvent Evapora- tion Technique, Cryst. Growth Des.20, 8280 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    J. A. Venables, G. D. T. Spiller, and M. Hanb¨ ucken, Nu- cleation and growth of thin films, Reports on Progress in Physics47, 399 (1984)

    1984

  37. [37]

    A. Raja, A. Chaves, J. Yu, G. Arefe, H. M. Hill, A. F. Rigosi, T. C. Berkelbach, P. Nagler, C. Sch¨ uller, T. Korn, C. Nuckolls, J. Hone, L. E. Brus, T. F. Heinz, D. R. Reichman, and A. Chernikov, Coulomb engineering of the bandgap and excitons in two-dimensional materials, Nature Communications8, 15251 (2017)

    2017

  38. [38]

    A. M. van der Zande, P. Y. Huang, D. A. Chenet, T. C. Berkelbach, Y. You, G.-H. Lee, T. F. Heinz, D. R. Re- ichman, D. A. Muller, and J. C. Hone, Grains and Grain Boundaries in Highly Crystalline Monolayer Molybde- num Disulphide, Nat. Mater.12, 554 (2013)

    2013

  39. [39]

    G. Xue, B. Qin, C. Ma, P. Yin, C. Liu, and K. Liu, Large- Area Epitaxial Growth of Transition Metal Dichalco- genides, Chem. Rev.124, 9785 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Cheng, W

    P. Cheng, W. Zhang, L. Zhang, J. Gou, P. K. J. Wong, and L. Chen, Molecular Beam Epitaxy Fabrication of Two-Dimensional Materials, in2D Semiconductor Ma- terials and Devices, Materials Today, edited by D. Chi, K. E. J. Goh, and A. T. S. Wee (Elsevier, 2020) pp. 103– 134

    2020

  41. [41]

    Vishwanath, P

    S. Vishwanath, P. Dang, and H. G. Xing, Challenges and Opportunities in Molecular Beam Epitaxy Growth of 2D Crystals: An Overview, inMolecular Beam Epitaxy (Sec- ond Edition), edited by M. Henini (Elsevier, 2018) second edition ed., pp. 443–485

    2018

  42. [42]

    D. K. Singh, K. K. Nanda, and S. B. Krupanidhi, Pulsed Laser Deposition of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides- Based Heterostructures for Efficient Photodetection, inPractical Applications of Laser Ablation, edited by D. Yang (IntechOpen, London, 2020) Chap. 2

    2020

  43. [43]

    R. H. Rai, A. P´ erez-Pacheco, R. Quispe-Siccha, N. R. Glavin, and C. Muratore, Pulsed Laser Anneal- ing of Amorphous Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A38, 052201 (2020)

    2020

  44. [44]

    W. C. Wong, S. M. Ng, H. F. Wong, W. F. Cheng, C. L. Mak, and C. W. Leung, Effect of Post-Annealing on Sput- tered MoS 2 Films, Solid-State Electron.138, 62 (2017), selected papers from INEC 2016 and ISNE 2016

    2017

  45. [45]

    Hussain, M

    S. Hussain, M. A. Shehzad, D. Vikraman, M. F. Khan, J. Singh, D.-C. Choi, Y. Seo, J. Eom, W.-G. Lee, and J. Jung, Synthesis and Characterization of Large-Area and Continuous MoS 2 Atomic Layers by RF Magnetron Sputtering, Nanoscale8, 4340 (2016)

    2016

  46. [46]

    K. Zhao, H. Lin, X. Xiao, W. Huang, W. Yao, M. Yan, Y. Xing, Q. Zhang, Z.-X. Li, S. Hoshino, J. Wang, S. Zhou, L. Gu, M. S. Bahramy, H. Yao, N. Nagaosa, Q.-K. Xue, K. T. Law, X. Chen, and S.-H. Ji, Disorder- induced multifractal superconductivity in monolayer nio- bium dichalcogenides, Nature Physics15, 904 (2019)

    2019

  47. [47]

    Choe, H.-J

    D.-H. Choe, H.-J. Sung, and K. J. Chang, Understand- ing topological phase transition in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B93, 125109 (2016)

    2016

  48. [48]

    Y. M. Jaques, C. F. Woellner, L. M. Sassi, M. L. Pereira Junior, L. A. Ribeiro Junior, P. M. Ajayan, and D. S. Galv˜ ao, Structural stability of sulfur- depleted MoS 2, ACS Nanoscience Au 10.1021/ac- snanoscienceau.5c00172 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1021/ac- 2026

  49. [49]

    K. Cho, M. Ko´ nczykowski, S. Teknowijoyo, M. A. Tanatar, J. Guss, P. B. Gartin, J. M. Wilde, A. Kreyssig, R. J. McQueeney, A. I. Goldman, V. Mishra, P. J. Hirschfeld, and R. Prozorov, Using controlled disorder to probe the interplay between charge order and super- conductivity in NbSe 2, Nature Communications9, 2796 (2018)

    2018

  50. [50]

    Saini, N

    A. Saini, N. K. Karn, K. Kumar, R. P. Aloysius, and V. P. S. Awana, Drastic suppression of CDW (charge density wave) by Pd addition in TiSe2, Journal of Super- conductivity and Novel Magnetism36, 3 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    S. Paul, S. Talukdar, R. S. Singh, and S. Saha, Topolog- ical phase transition in MoTe 2: A review, Physica Sta- tus Solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters17, 2200420 (2023)

    2023

  52. [52]

    M. S. Sokolikova and C. Mattevi, Direct synthesis of metastable phases of 2D transition metal dichalco- genides, Chemical Society Reviews49, 3952 (2020)

    2020

  53. [53]

    Q. Yu, L. A. Jauregui, W. Wu, R. Colby, J. Tian, Z. Su, H. Cao, Z. Liu, D. Pandey, D. Wei, T. F. Chung, P. Peng, N. P. Guisinger, E. A. Stach, J. Bao, S.-S. Pei, and Y. P. Chen, Control and characterization of individual grains and grain boundaries in graphene grown by chem- ical vapour deposition, Nature Materials10, 443 (2011)

    2011

  54. [54]

    G. H. Ahn, M. Amani, H. Rasool, D.-H. Lien, J. P. Mas- tandrea, J. W. Ager III, M. Dubey, D. C. Chrzan, A. M. 20 Minor, and A. Javey, Strain-engineered growth of two- dimensional materials, Nature Communications8, 608 (2017)

    2017

  55. [55]

    Zunger and O

    A. Zunger and O. I. Malyi, Understanding doping of quantum materials, Chemical Reviews121, 3031 (2021)

    2021

  56. [56]

    Shuang, D

    F. Shuang, D. Ocampo, R. Namakian, A. Ghasemi, P. Dey, and W. Gao, Kinetics of vacancy-assisted re- versible phase transition in monolayer MoTe 2, Commu- nications Materials7, 69 (2026)

    2026

  57. [57]

    Stach, B

    E. Stach, B. DeCost, A. G. Kusne, J. Hattrick-Simpers, K. A. Brown, K. G. Reyes, J. Schrier, S. Billinge, T. Buonassisi, I. Foster, C. P. Gomes, J. M. Gre- goire, A. Mehta, J. Montoya, E. Olivetti, C. Park, E. Rotenberg, S. K. Saikin, S. Smullin, V. Stanev, and B. Maruyama, Autonomous experimentation systems for materials development: A community perspect...

    2021

  58. [58]

    A. G. Kusne, H. Yu, C. Wu, H. Zhang, J. Hattrick- Simpers, B. DeCost, S. Sarker, C. Oses, C. Toher, S. Cur- tarolo, A. V. Davydov, R. Agarwal, L. A. Bendersky, M. Li, A. Mehta, and I. Takeuchi, On-the-fly closed-loop materials discovery via bayesian active learning, Nature Communications11, 5966 (2020)

    2020

  59. [59]

    N. J. Szymanski, B. Rendy, Y. Fei, R. E. Kumar, T. He, D. Milsted, M. J. McDermott, M. Gallant, E. D. Cubuk, A. Merchant, H. Kim, A. Jain, C. J. Bartel, K. Persson, Y. Zeng, and G. Ceder, An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of inorganic materials, Nature 624, 86 (2023)

    2023

  60. [60]

    S. H. Sung, N. Agarwal, I. El Baggari, P. Kezer, Y. M. Goh, N. Schnitzer, J. M. Shen, T. Chiang, Y. Liu, W. Lu, Y. Sun, L. F. Kourkoutis, J. T. Heron, K. Sun, and R. Hovden, Endotaxial stabilization of 2D charge den- sity waves with long-range order, Nature Communica- tions15, 1403 (2024)

    2024

  61. [61]

    Y. Li, N. Zaki, V. O. Garlea, A. T. Savici, D. Fobes, Z. Xu, F. Camino, C. Petrovic, G. Gu, P. D. Johnson, J. M. Tranquada, and I. A. Zaliznyak, Electronic prop- erties of the bulk and surface states of Fe 1+yTe1−xSex, Nature Materials20, 1221 (2021)

    2021