Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 138 references

Addressing rotational motion on gravitational waves detectors

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Ground tilt is a leading low-frequency noise for gravitational-wave detectors, and direct rotation sensors have matured enough to correct it.

desk verdict A sound, useful review of tilt sensing and control for GW detectors that overreaches in its abstract: the 'major limit' claim applies cleanly to aLIGO, not to Virgo/KAGRA. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.26430 v1 pith:OLSODKUL submitted 2026-07-29 physics.optics astro-ph.IMphysics.ins-det

Chiara Di Fronzo , Jian Liu This is my paper
classification physics.opticsastro-ph.IMphysics.ins-det
keywords rotationalgroundmotiontilt-to-lengthcouplinggravitational-wavedetectorsseismicnoiseinertialsensorsrotationactivevibrationisolationlow-frequencysensitivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the rotational components of Earth's seismic motion, tilt, are among the main factors limiting the sensitivity of ground-based gravitational-wave detectors below 10 Hz. It shows how tilt couples into horizontal inertial sensors as a gravity-over-frequency-squared term, displaces suspension points of optics, and mimics cavity-length changes, and it surveys the sensing and control technologies developed over the past decade to address it. The picture that emerges is that direct rotation sensors now reach picoradian-per-root-hertz-class noise floors, and the bottleneck has shifted from sensor sensitivity to integrating these measurements into detector control loops.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the tilt-translation coupling term in the inertial-sensor equation of motion: the horizontal displacement signal contains (-y + g/omega^2 theta), where theta is ground tilt, so at low frequencies tilt dominates the measurement. An additional mechanism is the tilt-to-length coupling at an optics suspension point, where a platform pitch theta over suspension height H shifts the optic along the beam by theta times H, and equivalently the inverted-pendulum transfer function x/Theta = g/omega0^2 + l, where omega0 is the pendulum's natural frequency. These two relations carry the argument because they show why measuring and controlling rotation directly is essential.

What would settle it

Measure the coherence between a horizontal seismometer and a colocated rotation sensor on an isolation platform from 0.1 to 10 Hz; if the tilt-corrected horizontal signal does not drop by the predicted gravity-over-frequency-squared amount, the tilt-coupling model and the claim that tilt dominates low-frequency noise would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that rotational ground motion is a dominant disturbance in the low-frequency band of terrestrial gravitational-wave detectors, arising through two physical mechanisms: tilt-to-translation coupling in inertial sensors, where the tilt term scales as gravity over frequency squared and thus dominates at low frequencies, and tilt-to-length coupling at suspension points, where a pitch rotation of a platform displaces the optic's support and alters the cavity length. The review catalogs recent direct rotation sensors, including beam rotation sensors, cylindrical inertial rotation sensors, quartz rotation sensors, and interferometric tilt sensors, with noise floors such

Load-bearing premise

The review's conclusions rest on the completeness and accuracy of its literature selection, particularly the quoted rotation-sensor sensitivity figures and the attribution of tilt as a major noise source below 10 Hz, rather than on a new central measurement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Tilt-corrected horizontal seismometers would remove a dominant low-frequency contamination, letting active isolation platforms hold cavities at resonance with less actuation effort.
  • Several surveyed sensors already meet or exceed detector rotation-sensing requirements, so the main implementation barrier is ultra-high-vacuum compatibility and compactness, not sensitivity.
  • Frequency-dependent sensor-correction filters that diagonalize the horizontal degree of freedom can subtract tilt in real time, improving platform motion suppression.
  • For passively isolated detectors, inertial damping of inverted pendula can reduce tilt-induced motion without injecting noise into the detection band.
  • Tilt sensors also support Newtonian-noise cancellation, because they directly measure the gravity-gradient signal that models use for subtraction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A quantitative experiment comparing the low-frequency noise budget of a detector with and without a picoradian-class rotation sensor colocated on the isolation platform would directly test how much of the sub-10 Hz sensitivity gap is actually tilt-limited.
  • The gravity-over-frequency-squared scaling implies that future underground or lunar detectors will still need rotation sensors, since tilt contamination depends on gravity and frequency, not just ground acceleration amplitude.
  • As test masses grow heavier and optical powers increase, tilt-induced angular disturbances may become relatively more important; the review's catalog could serve as a checklist for next-generation suspension design.
  • The review's comparative table relies on disparate reported sensitivity numbers from different setups; an independent cross-comparison of rotation sensors on a single shake table would strengthen the case.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review paper surveys the role of rotational seismic ground motion ('tilt') in limiting the sensitivity of terrestrial gravitational-wave detectors below 10 Hz. It develops analytic models for tilt coupling into horizontal inertial sensors and inverted-pendulum suspensions, reviews recent rotation-sensing technologies (BRS, ALFRA, CRS, QRS, 6D inertial sensors, SPI, optical levers, ITS), and compares control strategies (sensor correction, inertial damping, feedforward/feedback, post-processing). It closes with perspectives for future detectors including ET, Cosmic Explorer, LISA, and LGWA. The paper's main contribution is a current technology survey and a synthesis of control strategies; the analytic derivations are pedagogical and standard in structure.

Significance. If its claims are correct, the review is a timely and useful synthesis: it collects performance figures for picoradian-class rotation sensors developed in the last decade, maps them onto the control architectures of aLIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and test facilities, and discusses control-theoretic issues such as non-minimum-phase zeros in tilt-contaminated loops. The comparison tables (Table II, Figs. 15 and 18) and the classification of hardware vs. software mitigation approaches are valuable. The principal weakness is that the broad framing claim in the abstract is not supported by the site-specific evidence presented in the body: the paper itself shows that tilt is a major limitation mainly for aLIGO-like active-isolation detectors and for wind-affected periods at Virgo, not for all terrestrial detectors under nominal conditions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. I] The lead claim that rotational seismic motion is 'one of the major contributions' limiting the sensitivity of terrestrial GW detectors below 10 Hz is contradicted by the paper's own site-by-site discussion. Sec. II C a states that Virgo's main seismic noise in the detection band comes from the residual vertical component, making other DOFs negligible above 4 Hz. Sec. III B 2 states that Virgo currently has no tilt subtraction because alignment control noise is not an issue, and that KAGRA's underground location provides an accepted suppression. The evidence supports aLIGO-like active-isolation detectors and wind-induced episodes for Virgo, not a blanket statement for all terrestrial detectors. Additionally, the 1/f² feature in Fig. 1 is total ground motion, not the rotational component, so it does not by itself establish that tilt is the dominant limitation. Please qualify the abstract,
  2. [Sec. II A, Eq. (5); Sec. II C, Eq. (10)] Eq. (5) is not the correct transfer function for a horizontal inertial sensor. From F=m\ddot x=-b\dot w-kw+mg\theta and w=x-y, the Fourier-domain equation is (-m\omega^2+i\omega b+k)w = m\omega^2 y + mg\theta, so w = (m\omega^2 y + mg\theta)/(k-m\omega^2+i\omega b). The printed Eq. (5) has denominator m\omega^2+i\omega b+k and a negative sign in front of y; both the sign of the mass term and the sign of y are wrong. Although the qualitative g/\omega^2 scaling of the tilt term survives, the equation as written cannot be used to reproduce the response shown in Fig. 3. Similarly, Eq. (10) in Sec. II C has a sign inconsistency: the inertia term should be -ml\omega^2 x, and the subsequent Eq. (11) is correct, but the intermediate step as printed does not lead to it. Please correct both derivations.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] Numerous typos should be fixed: 'ration' for 'ratio' (Sec. II C, near Eq. (13)); 'AdVirgo+' for 'AdV+'; 'mirros' for 'mirrors'; 'sesimic' for 'seismic'; 'referred at as' for 'referred to as' (Sec. II C b); 'V enkateswara' with stray spaces in references; 'Multivarialble' for 'Multivariable' in ref. 100; 'LGW A' for 'LGWA' (Sec. IV); 'Nickef' likely 'Nikhef' (Sec. III A 1 a); and the title's 'gravitational waves detectors' should be 'gravitational-wave detectors'.
  2. [Sec. II C, after Eq. (16)] The text says the tilt effect is 'inversely proportional to the square of the natural frequency of the pendulum'. Eq. (16) gives x/Theta = g/omega0^2 + l, so the response is a sum of a 1/omega0^2 term and a length term. The wording should reflect that the length term is independent of the natural frequency.
  3. [Sec. II C a] The sentence 'In 2025 AdVirgo+ will enter a phase II' is temporally inconsistent with the paper's 2026 date; it should be reworded to 'entered' or 'is planned to enter'.
  4. [Sec. III A 1 b and Table II] Some performance claims and installation plans rely on LIGO internal notes or 'correspondence with Virgo members' rather than peer-reviewed/public documents. For a review, this is acceptable if flagged, but the reader should be told which numbers are from private communication and which are from published measurements. Please mark these consistently and, where possible, replace with citable public documentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation; the review is a literature synthesis. Self-citations are minor and not load-bearing; the abstract's overgeneralization is a correctness issue, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper is a review, not an original derivation. Its only self-contained derivations are (i) the inertial-sensor tilt coupling, Eq. (5) w = mω²/(mω² + iωb + k)(−y + g/ω² θ), and (ii) the inverted-pendulum tilt-to-length transfer, Eq. (16) x/Θ = g/ω₀² + l. Both are standard oscillator equations with no fitted parameters; the quoted result that tilt couples as g/ω² follows algebraically from the equation of motion and is not assumed in the input. The central claim that rotational ground motion limits low-frequency sensitivity is supported by external measurements (Lantz et al. 2009, Matichard et al. 2015, Venkateswara et al. 2017, Harms et al. 2020) rather than by the authors' own prior work. The self-citations (Di Fronzo et al. 2025 for control optimization; Ubhi et al. 2022 and related papers for the 6D seismometer; Liu et al. 2018 for angular instability) are used as literature entries and are externally published and falsifiable; they do not serve as the load-bearing premise of any derivation. The paper's abstract overstates the claim relative to its own body—Sec. II C a says Virgo's main seismic noise is the residual vertical component and other DOFs are negligible above 4 Hz, and Sec. III B 2 says Virgo has no tilt subtraction because it is not affected to a level where it is necessary—but this is an internal-consistency/overgeneralization problem, not circularity. Some supporting performance figures rest on LIGO internal notes and 'correspondence with Virgo members' (Sec. III A 1 b), which limits independent verification but does not make the derivation circular. No step reduces a prediction to its own input by construction, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review, so its claims rest on the cited primary literature rather than new analysis. The only original math are standard transfer-function derivations (Secs. II A and II C), which use small-angle approximations and lumped-parameter models. The factual content—sensor noise floors, control performances, and detector requirements—is imported from external references, several of which are internal technical notes or private communications.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Small-angle approximation sinθ≈θ and linearity of the spring-mass and inverted-pendulum models in Sec. II A and II C.
    Used to derive Eqs. (5) and (14); valid at the sub-nanoradian amplitudes discussed in the review.
  • domain assumption The pivot of an inverted pendulum can be modeled as a spring of stiffness k and damping b (Sec. II C, between Eq. (7) and Eq. (8)).
    A standard lumped-parameter model for pendulum pivot flexibility, but not derived in the paper.
  • standard math Rotational ground motion couples to horizontal inertial sensors as g/ω² (Eq. (5)).
    Follows from the equations of motion; well-established in the cited literature.
  • domain assumption The sensitivity and noise-floor numbers for BRS, CRS, QRS, ALFRA, ITS, SPI, SILENT are taken from the cited references and are not re-measured here.
    The review's survey rests on the accuracy of the cited sensor characterizations, some of which are internal technical notes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Addressing rotational motion on gravitational waves detectors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OLSODKUL

@misc{pith2026260726430,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Addressing rotational motion on gravitational waves detectors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OLSODKUL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26430}
}
read the original abstract

The rotational components of Earth's seismic motion are one of the major contributions to limit the sensitivity of terrestrial gravitational-wave detectors at frequencies below 10 Hz. The fundamental challenges lie in understanding the angular degrees of freedom of seismic motion and how they can be accurately measured. These are both crucial steps for developing an adequate control system to suppress seismic motion and maintaining resonance in the detector cavities. This review shows why the rotational ground motion limits the detector's sensitivity and gives an overview of the technological achievements of the last decade on both the sensing and control systems sides. Perspectives on future developments in the field are also briefly illustrated.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26430 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Seismic motion amplitude spectral densities of all 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Schematic of a generic inertial sensor operating in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Tilt to translation transfer function example. This [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Contributions to the suspension point L motions. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Side-view drawings example of the HAM-ISI hosting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Schematic of an inverted pendulum subjected to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Image of the stages forming the Virgo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Four different types of KAGRA suspension system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Performance requirement for the BSC and HAM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Schematic representation of the behavior of rotation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: BRS working principle. High-precision devices of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Design principle of the SILENT platform actively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_14.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Schematic design of the CRS, as a general example [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_13.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Summary of the noise floors of the technologies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Basic principle of an optical lever: an optic is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_16.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: Comparison of the main relative angular sensors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19: General scheme of a typical LIGO-like control system commonly in use. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_19.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Detector configuration of KAGRA–the Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector , volume =

    Kentaro Somiya , doi =. Detector configuration of KAGRA–the Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector , volume =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , month =

  2. [2]

    International Journal of Modern Physics D , title =

    Michele Punturo and Kentaro Somiya , doi =. International Journal of Modern Physics D , title =

  3. [3]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , month =

    Mirror actuation design for the interferometer control of the KAGRA gravitational wave telescope , volume =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , month =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa90e3 , issn =

    doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa90e3

  4. [4]

    doi:10.1093/ptep/ptx180 , issn =

    Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , title =. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptx180 , issn =

    doi:10.1093/ptep/ptx180

  5. [5]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , month =

    Cryogenic suspension design for a kilometer-scale gravitational-wave detector , volume =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , month =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abe9f3 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abe9f3

  6. [6]

    doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa125 , issn =

    Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , title =. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa125 , issn =

    doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa125

  7. [7]

    doi:10.1093/ptep/ptab018 , issn =

    Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , title =. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptab018 , issn =

    doi:10.1093/ptep/ptab018

  8. [8]

    LVK Meeting, Toyama, Japan 2023 , title =

    2023

Show all 138 references
  1. [9]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =

    Edgar Bonilla and Brett Shapiro and Brian Lantz , doi =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =

  2. [10]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Observation of a potential future sensitivity limitation from ground motion at LIGO Hanford , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  3. [11]

    Hagedorn and Matthew D

    Krishna Venkateswara and Charles A. Hagedorn and Matthew D. Turner and Trevor Arp and Jens H. Gundlach , doi =. Review of Scientific Instruments , title =

  4. [12]

    Jaroszewicz and Anna Kurzych and Krzysztof P

    Leszek R. Jaroszewicz and Anna Kurzych and Krzysztof P. Teisseyre and Zbigniew Krajewski , doi =. Geophysics , title =

  5. [13]

    Kurzych and Leszek R

    Anna T. Kurzych and Leszek R. Jaroszewicz and Michał Dudek , doi =. Proceedings - 28th International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors, OFS 2023 , title =

    2023

  6. [14]

    J. J. McCann and J. Winterflood and L. Ju and C. Zhao , doi =. Review of Scientific Instruments , title =

  7. [15]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =

    Jinsong Liu and Xin Xu and Yidong Tan , doi =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =

  8. [16]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =

    Wentong Fan and Sijun Fang and Hongwen Hai and Jie Song and Jinhang Zhou and Yuwei Wu and Rurui Zou and Kai Zhao and Rui Zhang and Bohong Li and Jian Luo and Bin He and Minyan Qiu and Lei Fan and Zizheng Li and Hongchao Zhao and Yong Yan , doi =. Classical and Quantum Gravity ...

  9. [17]

    Optics Express , title =

    HongAn Lin and JianCong Li and YaoZhang Huang and Miao Yu and JiaXiong Luo and Zhi Wang and YanXiong Wu , doi =. Optics Express , title =

  10. [18]

    Optics Express , title =

    Wen Tong Fan and Jie Song and Hong Wen Hai and Si Jun Fang and Kai Zhao and Rui Zhang and Bo Hong Li and Jian Luo and Qi Cheng Sun and Lei Fan and Zi Zheng Li and Hsien-Chi Yeh and Yong Yan , doi =. Optics Express , title =

  11. [19]

    Galaxies , title =

    Lucia Trozzo and Francesca Badaracco , doi =. Galaxies , title =

  12. [20]

    M. G. Beker and G. Cella and R. DeSalvo and M. Doets and H. Grote and J. Harms and E. Hennes and V. Mandic and D. S. Rabeling and J. F.J. van den Brand and C. M. van Leeuwen , doi =. General Relativity and Gravitation , title =

  13. [21]

    European Physical Journal Plus , title =

    Jan Harms and Luca Naticchioni and Enrico Calloni and Rosario De Rosa and Fulvio Ricci and Domenico D’Urso , doi =. European Physical Journal Plus , title =

  14. [22]

    Riles , doi =

    K. Riles , doi =. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics , title =

  15. [23]

    doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abbc8c , issn =

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abbc8c , issn =

    doi

  16. [24]

    A control strategy for seismic noise reduction on advanced LIGO gravitational-wave detector , volume =

    C Di Fronzo and J Driggers and J Warner and E Schwartz and B Lantz and A Pelé and S Biscans and C M Mow-Lowry and R Mittleman , doi =. A control strategy for seismic noise reduction on advanced LIGO gravitational-wave detector , volume =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , month =

  17. [25]

    Long-term study of the seismic environment at LIGO , volume =

    E J Daw and J A Giaime and D Lormand and M Lubinski and J Zweizig , doi =. Long-term study of the seismic environment at LIGO , volume =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , month =

  18. [26]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , month =

    Seismic isolation enhancements for initial and advanced LIGO , volume =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , month =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/5/081 , issn =

    doi

  19. [27]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , month =

    Seismic isolation of Advanced LIGO: Review of strategy, instrumentation and performance , volume =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , month =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/18/185003 , issn =

    doi

  20. [28]

    Local active isolation of the AEI-SAS for the AEI 10 m prototype facility , volume =

    R Kirchhoff and C M Mow-Lowry and G Bergmann and M M Hanke and P Koch and S M Köhlenbeck and S Leavey and J Lehmann and P Oppermann and J Wöhler and D S Wu and H Lück and K A Strain , doi =. Local active isolation of the AEI-SAS for the AEI 10 m prototype facility , volume =. ...

  21. [29]

    Hagedorn and Jens H

    Krishna Venkateswara and Charles A. Hagedorn and Jens H. Gundlach and Jeffery Kissel and Jim Warner and Hugh Radkins and Thomas Shaffer and Brian Lantz and Richard Mittleman and Fabrice Matichard and Robert Schofield , doi =. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , title =

  22. [30]

    doi:10.1785/0220170148 , journal =

    Low‐Frequency Tilt Seismology with a Precision Ground‐Rotation Sensor , year =. doi:10.1785/0220170148 , journal =

    doi

  23. [31]

    Michael P. Ross and Krishna Venkateswara and Conor Mow-Lowry and Sam Cooper and Jim Warner and Brian Lantz and Jeffrey Kissel and Hugh Radkins and Thomas Shaffer and Richard Mittleman and Arnaud Pele and Jens Gundlach , doi =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =

  24. [32]

    Akutsu and

    T. Akutsu and. Nature Astronomy , title =. doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0658-y , issn =

    doi

  25. [33]

    Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics , title =

    Keiko Kokeyama and June Gyu Park and Kyuman Cho and Shin Kirii and Tomotada Akutsu and Masayuki Nakano and Shogo Kambara and Kunihiko Hasegawa and Naoko Ohishi and Kohei Doi and Seiji Kawamura , doi =. Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics , title =

  26. [34]

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/2/025005 , issn =

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/2/025005 , issn =

    doi

  27. [35]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =

    Przemyslaw Figura and Tomasz Bulik and Jan Harms and Enrico Calloni and Luciano Errico and Rosario De Rosa and Alberto Gennai , doi =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =

  28. [36]

    Galaxies , title =

    Annalisa Allocca and Diego Bersanetti and Julia Casanueva Diaz and Camilla De Rossi and Maddalena Mantovani and Alain Masserot and Loïc Rolland and Paolo Ruggi and Bas Swinkels and Enzo Nicolas Tapia San Martin and Marco Vardaro and Michal Was , doi =. Galaxies , title =

  29. [37]

    Z. B. Zhou and J. Winterflood and Li Ju and D. G. Blair , doi =. Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics , title =

  30. [38]

    Demonstration of tilt sensing using a homodyne quadrature interferometric translational sensor , volume =

    Koji Nagano and Karera Mori and Kiwamu Izumi , doi =. Demonstration of tilt sensing using a homodyne quadrature interferometric translational sensor , volume =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , month =

  31. [39]

    Koehlenbeck and Conor M

    Sina M. Koehlenbeck and Conor M. Mow-Lowry and Gerald Bergmann and Robin Kirchoff and Philip Koch and Gerrit Kühn and Johannes Lehmann and Patrick Oppermann and Janis Wöhler and David S. Wu , doi =. Scientific Reports , title =

  32. [40]

    B. P. Abbott and. Physical Review Letters , title =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 , issn =

    doi

  33. [41]

    Advanced LIGO , volume =

    J Aasi and. Advanced LIGO , volume =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , month =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001 , issn =

    doi

  34. [42]

    Acernese and

    F. Acernese and. Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001 , issn =

    doi

  35. [43]

    Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics , title =

    Vincenzino Dattilo , doi =. Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics , title =

  36. [44]

    doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2010.01.006 , issn =

    Astroparticle Physics , title =. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2010.01.006 , issn =

    2010 doi

  37. [45]

    doi:10.1260/0263-0923.30.1.63 , issn =

    Journal of Low Frequency Noise Vibration and Active Control , title =. doi:10.1260/0263-0923.30.1.63 , issn =

    doi

  38. [46]

    doi:10.1016/j.nima.2023.168021 , issn =

    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , title =. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2023.168021 , issn =

    2023

  39. [47]

    Living Reviews in Relativity , title =

    Matthew Pitkin and Stuart Reid and Sheila Rowan and Jim Hough , doi =. Living Reviews in Relativity , title =

  40. [48]

    doi:10.3390/galaxies10030063 , issn =

    Galaxies , title =. doi:10.3390/galaxies10030063 , issn =

    doi

  41. [49]

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084023 , issn =

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084023 , issn =

    doi

  42. [50]

    doi:10.1088/1742-6596/228/1/012027 , issn =

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series , title =. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/228/1/012027 , issn =

    doi

  43. [51]

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/14/145005 , issn =

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/14/145005 , issn =

    doi

  44. [52]

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/24/245007 , issn =

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/24/245007 , issn =

    doi

  45. [53]

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/9/095024 , issn =

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/9/095024 , issn =

    doi

  46. [54]

    doi:10.1088/1742-6596/363/1/012012 , issn =

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series , title =. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/363/1/012012 , issn =

    doi

  47. [55]

    doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa5e1f , issn =

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa5e1f , issn =

    doi

  48. [56]

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/5/077 , issn =

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/5/077 , issn =

    doi

  49. [57]

    doi:10.1088/1742-6596/32/1/056 , issn =

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series , title =. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/32/1/056 , issn =

    doi

  50. [58]

    E. J. Chin and J. C. Dumas and C. Zhao and L. Ju and D. G. Blair , doi =. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , title =

  51. [59]

    Barriga and J

    P. Barriga and J. C. Dumas and A. A. Woolley and C. Zhao and D. G. Blair , doi =. Review of Scientific Instruments , title =

  52. [60]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =

    Hamid Satari and Carl Blair and Li Ju and David Blair and Chunnong Zhao and Erdinc Saygin and Patrick Meyers and David Lumley , doi =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =

  53. [61]

    Sina Maria Köhlenbeck , title =

  54. [62]

    Bergmann , title =

    G. Bergmann , title =

  55. [63]

    M. H. Lakkis , issue =. A six-degrees-of-freedom platform for deci-hertz active isolation using optical inertial sensors , volume =. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control , pages =

  56. [64]

    S. J. Cooper and C. M. Mow-Lowry and D. Hoyland and J. Bryant and A. Ubhi and J. O'dell and A. Huddart and S. Aston and A. Vecchio , doi =. Review of Scientific Instruments , title =

  57. [65]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

    A six degree-of-freedom fused silica seismometer: Design and tests of a metal prototype , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  58. [66]

    Collins and Alex Gill and Alexandra Mitchell and Joscha Heinze and Jiri Smetana and Tianliang Yan and Alan V

    Leonid Prokhorov and Sam Cooper and Amit Singh Ubhi and Conor Mow-Lowry and John Bryant and Artemiy Dmitriev and Chiara Di Fronzo and Christopher J. Collins and Alex Gill and Alexandra Mitchell and Joscha Heinze and Jiri Smetana and Tianliang Yan and Alan V. Cumming and Giles ...

  59. [67]

    van Dongen and L

    J. van Dongen and L. Prokhorov and S. J. Cooper and M. A. Barton and E. Bonilla and K. L. Dooley and J. C. Driggers and A. Effler and N. A. Holland and A. Huddart and M. Kasprzack and J. S. Kissel and B. Lantz and A. L. Mitchell and J. O’Dell and A. Pele and C. Robertson and C...

  60. [68]

    S. J. Cooper and C. J. Collins and A. C. Green and D. Hoyland and C. C. Speake and A. Freise and C. M. Mow-Lowry , doi =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =

  61. [69]

    Carbone and S

    L. Carbone and S. M. Aston and R. M. Cutler and A. Freise and J. Greenhalgh and J. Heefner and D. Hoyland and N. A. Lockerbie and D. Lodhia and N. A. Robertson and C. C. Speake and K. A. Strain and A. Vecchio , doi =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =

  62. [70]

    Applied Physics Letters , title =

    Amit Singh Ubhi and Leonid Prokhorov and Sam Cooper and Chiara Di Fronzo and John Bryant and David Hoyland and Alexandra Mitchell and Jesse Van Dongen and Conor Mow-Lowry and Alan Cumming and Giles Hammond and Denis Martynov , doi =. Applied Physics Letters , title =

  63. [71]

    Advanced LIGO OSEM Final Design Document , institution =

  64. [72]

    Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , title =

    Fabrice Matichard and Matthew Evans , doi =. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , title =

  65. [73]

    M. S. Hartig and J. Marmor and D. George and S. Paczkowski and J. Sanjuan , doi =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =

  66. [74]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =

    Peng Qiu and Xiang Lin and Yurong Liang and Hao Yan and Haixing Miao and Zebing Zhou , doi =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =

  67. [75]

    Physical Review D , title =

    Hao Kang Chen and Pan Pan Wang and Cheng Gang Shao , doi =. Physical Review D , title =

  68. [76]

    Optics Express , title =

    Lujia Zhao and Zichao Fan and Hao Tan and Yan Mo and Huiru Ji and Haibo Wang and Donglin Ma , doi =. Optics Express , title =

  69. [77]

    Cumming and Giles Hammond and Valery Frolov and Richard Mittleman and Peter Fritchel , doi =

    Jiri Smetana and Amit Singh Ubhi and Emilia Chick and Leonid Prokhorov and John Bryant and Artemiy Dmitriev and Alex Gill and Lari Koponen and Denis Martynov and Haixing Miao and Alan V. Cumming and Giles Hammond and Valery Frolov and Richard Mittleman and Peter Fritchel , doi...

  70. [78]

    IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , title =

    Zehao Yan and Qilin Song and Naiting Gu and Ziye Zhou and Yang Li and Linhai Huang and Zao Yi and Yuntao Cheng , doi =. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , title =

  71. [79]

    Sensors , title =

    Weigang Bai and Wenwu Feng and Peigen Wang and Ziliang Zhang and Guoying Zhao , doi =. Sensors , title =

  72. [80]

    Physical Review D , title =

    Xue Wang and Jinke Yang and Zhao Cui and Yikun Wang and Jianjun Jia and Liang Zhang , doi =. Physical Review D , title =

  73. [81]

    IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , title =

    Xin Xu and Jinsong Liu and Henglin Mu and Yan Li and Yidong Tan , doi =. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , title =

  74. [82]

    Optics Express , title =

    Xiang Lin and Hao Yan and Hai-Xing Miao and Peng Qiu and Yu-Rong Liang and Hsien-Chi Yeh and Ze-Bing Zhou , doi =. Optics Express , title =

  75. [83]

    Paczkowski and R

    S. Paczkowski and R. Giusteri and M. Hewitson and N. Karnesis and E. D. Fitzsimons and G. Wanner and G. Heinzel , doi =. Physical Review D , title =

  76. [84]

    Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics , title =

    Niklas Houba and Simon Delchambre and Tobias Ziegler and Walter Fichter , doi =. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics , title =

  77. [85]

    Galaxies , title =

    Tomislav Andric and Jan Harms , doi =. Galaxies , title =

  78. [86]

    Errico and G

    Annalisa Allocca and Saverio Avino and Enrico Calloni and Sergio Caprara and Massimo Carpinelli and Domenico D’Urso and Martina De Laurentis and Rosario De Rosa and L. Errico and G. Gagliardi and Marco Grilli and Valentina Mangano and Maria Marsella and Luca Naticchioni and An...

  79. [87]

    Carter and Samuel J

    Jonathan J. Carter and Samuel J. Cooper and Edward Thrift and Joseph Briggs and Jim Warner and Michael P. Ross and Conor M. Mow-Lowry , doi =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , title =

  80. [88]

    Ross , title =

    Michael P. Ross , title =

  81. [89]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , year =

    Chiara Di Fronzo and NA Holland and AL Mitchell and SJ Cooper and Michele Valentini and D Martynov and L Prokhorov and CM Mow-Lowry , title =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , year =

  82. [90]

    A vacuum-compatible cylindrical inertial rotation sensor with picoradian sensitivity , journal =

  83. [91]

    High performance rotational vibration isolator , journal =

  84. [92]

    Rotational Seismology with a Quartz Rotation Sensor , journal =

  85. [93]

    Rotation, Strain, and Translation Sensors Performance Tests with Active Seismic Sources , journal =

  86. [94]

    Trozzo, Lucia , title =

  87. [95]

    June Gyu Park and Kyuman Cho , title =. Appl. Opt. 55, 2155-2159 , year =

  88. [96]

    Optimizing active seismic isolation systems in gravitational-wave detectors , journal =

  89. [97]

    Collette and F

    C. Collette and F. Matichard , title =. Journal of Sound and Vibration , year =

  90. [98]

    The payload of the Lunar Gravitational-wave Antenna , journal =

  91. [99]

    Harms , title =

    J. Harms , title =. ApJ 910 1 , year =

  92. [100]

    Angular control noise in Advanced Virgo and implications for the Einstein Telescope , journal =

  93. [101]

    Review of Scientific Instruments , volume=

    Angular instability in high optical power suspended cavities , author=. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  94. [102]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

    Automated alignment of an optical cavity using machine learning , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  95. [103]

    Science , volume=

    Improving cosmological reach of a gravitational wave observatory using Deep Loop Shaping , author=. Science , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  96. [104]

    Physical Review Applied , volume=

    Characterizing seismic isolation using convolutional neural networks and Wiener filters , author=. Physical Review Applied , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  97. [105]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , year=

    An optimised H Multi-Input Multi-Output controller for suspensions in interferometric gravitational wave detectors , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , year=

  98. [106]

    Qiu, L and Davidod, E. J. , title =. Automatica, Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 337-349 , year =

  99. [107]

    Skogestad, Sigud and Postlethwaite, Ian , title =

  100. [108]

    Engineering Research Express , volume=

    Active damping of rotating platforms using integral force feedback , author=. Engineering Research Express , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  101. [109]

    Seismological Society of America , volume=

    Dynamic tilt correction using direct rotational motion measurements , author=. Seismological Society of America , volume=

  102. [110]

    Physical Review Research , volume=

    Noise reduction in gravitational-wave data via deep learning , author=. Physical Review Research , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  103. [111]

    galaxies , volume=

    Cosmic explorer: A next-generation ground-based gravitational-wave observatory , author=. galaxies , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  104. [112]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

    LISA technology and instrumentation , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

  105. [113]

    Physical Review Applied , volume=

    Optical suppression of tilt-to-length coupling in the LISA long-arm interferometer , author=. Physical Review Applied , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  106. [114]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

    Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  107. [115]

    Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , volume=

    Requirements for a ground rotation sensor to improve advanced LIGO , author=. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  108. [116]

    Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments , volume=

    Passive and active seismic isolation for gravitational radiation detectors and other instruments , author=. Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments , volume=

  109. [117]

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series , volume=

    Active vibration isolation using a suspension point interferometer , author=. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , volume=

  110. [118]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

    The inertial damping of the VIRGO superattenuator and the residual motion of the mirror , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

  111. [119]

    Review of Scientific Instruments , volume=

    Inertial control of the mirror suspensions of the VIRGO interferometer for gravitational wave detection , author=. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  112. [120]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

    First cryogenic test operation of underground km-scale gravitational-wave observatory KAGRA , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  113. [121]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

    Vibration isolation system with a compact damping system for power recycling mirrors of KAGRA , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  114. [122]

    Sensors , volume=

    Seismological processing of six degree-of-freedom ground-motion data , author=. Sensors , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  115. [123]

    Machine Learning: Science and Technology , volume=

    Enhancing gravitational-wave science with machine learning , author=. Machine Learning: Science and Technology , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  116. [124]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15046 , year=

    Applications of machine learning in gravitational wave research with current interferometric detectors , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15046 , year=

    arXiv

  117. [125]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth , volume=

    Reliable real-time seismic signal/noise discrimination with machine learning , author=. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  118. [126]

    Seismological research letters , volume=

    Improving the signal-to-noise ratio of seismological datasets by unsupervised machine learning , author=. Seismological research letters , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  119. [127]

    Geophysics , volume=

    Machine learning for seismic exploration: Where are we and how far are we from the holy grail? , author=. Geophysics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  120. [128]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

    Newtonian-noise cancellation in large-scale interferometric GW detectors using seismic tiltmeters , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  121. [129]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Implications of dedicated seismometer measurements on Newtonian-noise cancellation for Advanced LIGO , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  122. [130]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , volume=

    Sagnac gyroscopes and the GINGER Project , author=. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  123. [131]

    Calculating the precision of tilt-to-length coupling estimation and noise subtraction in LISA using Fisher information , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.022005 , url =

    2023 doi

  124. [132]

    Geophysical Journal International , volume=

    Broad-band observations of earthquake-induced rotational ground motions , author=. Geophysical Journal International , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  125. [133]

    Eibl, Eva P. S. and Rosskopf, Martina and Sciotto, Mariangela and Currenti, Gilda and Di Grazia, Giuseppe and Jousset, Philippe and Krüger, Frank and Weber, Michael , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023617 , year =

    doi

  126. [134]

    Seismological Research Letters , volume=

    Recent advances in rotational seismology , author=. Seismological Research Letters , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  127. [135]

    Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , volume=

    Six degree-of-freedom broadband ground-motion observations with portable sensors: Validation, local earthquakes, and signal processing , author=. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  128. [136]

    Seismic Instruments , volume=

    Rotational seismology: Review of achievements and outlooks , author=. Seismic Instruments , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  129. [137]

    Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , volume=

    Introduction to the special issue on rotational seismology and engineering applications , author=. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  130. [138]

    Geophysics , volume=

    Advances in 6C seismology: Applications of combined translational and rotational motion measurements in global and exploration seismology , author=. Geophysics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.