pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.19062 · v1 · pith:OM3PQFIFnew · submitted 2026-06-17 · 💻 cs.CV

DREAM: Extending Vision-Language Models with Dual-Objective Encoding for Cross-Modal Retrieval

Kaleem Ullah , Altaf Hussain , Muhammad Munsif , Sung Wook Baik This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 21:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords cross-modal retrievaltext-to-video retrievalvision-language modelsmasked language modelingpermuted language modelinghierarchical attentiontemporal modelingvideo retrieval
0
0 comments X

The pith

DREAM improves text-to-video retrieval by pairing masked and permuted language modeling with a hierarchical vision encoder that uses cascaded group attention.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces DREAM to address limitations in capturing temporal dynamics and linguistic nuance in video retrieval from text queries. It replaces standard single-objective language modeling with a hybrid strategy that runs both masked and permuted objectives on the text side. On the vision side it replaces flat encoders with a multi-stage hierarchical encoder whose cascaded group attention refines spatial and temporal tokens from coarse to fine. When tested on MSRVTT, MSVD and LSMDC the model records new recall@1 numbers of 49.4 percent, 49.7 percent and 27.3 percent. These results indicate that the dual objectives and staged attention together produce tighter cross-modal alignment than earlier vision-language models.

Core claim

DREAM achieves new state-of-the-art recall@1 scores of 49.4 percent on MSRVTT, 49.7 percent on MSVD and 27.3 percent on LSMDC by integrating a hybrid language modeling strategy that combines masked and permuted objectives with a hierarchical vision encoder that performs multi-stage token interaction through cascaded group attention.

What carries the argument

Hybrid language modeling strategy combining masked and permuted language modeling objectives, together with a hierarchical vision encoder that uses cascaded group attention for multi-stage token interaction and coarse-to-fine refinement.

Load-bearing premise

That the reported gains on the three benchmarks are driven primarily by the hybrid language modeling and cascaded group attention rather than by other training choices or model scale.

What would settle it

An ablation that removes either the permuted language modeling objective or the cascaded group attention layers and retrains on the same three datasets, then checks whether recall@1 falls below the published numbers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.19062 by Altaf Hussain, Kaleem Ullah, Muhammad Munsif, Sung Wook Baik.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Progress of methodologies in text-to-video retrieval. With the establishment and broader adoption of standard benchmarks, research has shifted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of the visual feature encoder architecture. The top (a) shows a four-stage hierarchical transformer that encodes video frames into multiscale [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Text encoder architecture illustrating two complementary language modeling strategies within a multi-head attention framework. (a) A transformer￾based encoder processes input text, which is first tokenized using byte pair encoding and enriched with positional encodings. (b) The architecture branches into two parallel modeling objectives: masked language modeling (MLM), where selected tokens are masked and … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Examples of video-text pairs from benchmark datasets. Each clip is represented by four sampled frames (left) and five corresponding human-annotated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Attention heatmaps from the final transformer layer, illustrating the model’s focus on semantically relevant regions. The left set of examples shows the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Visualization of attention weights in the alignment module. We select three query embeddings and top-3 attention weights for clearer interpretation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Qualitative comparison of text-to-video retrieval results on the MSRVTT [25] dataset. Given each text query, we show the R@1 retrieved video produced by LSDO [21], a variant without MLM and PLM and the proposed DREAM model. Blue box highlights correct results. corresponding attention activation map. The visualizations demonstrate that the CGAT mechanism consistently highlights semantically meaningful regio… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative comparison of text-to-video retrieval results on the MSRVTT [25] dataset. Given each text query, we show the R@1 retrieved video produced by CLIP4Clip [4], LSDO [21], and DREAM model. The left column presents the retrieval results with the original queries, while the right column shows the retrieval results after perturbing the input queries to observe the effect of permutation modeling. Blue b… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In today's media-driven world, the exponential growth of video content across domains such as surveillance, education, and entertainment has made retrieving semantically relevant videos via natural language queries increasingly critical. Early video retrieval systems relied on handcrafted features or shallow cross-modal mappings, limiting their ability to capture complex semantics and temporal dynamics. While large-scale vision-language models have improved cross-modal alignment, challenges remain in modeling fine-grained temporal dependencies and nuanced linguistic structures. In this paper, we introduce DREAM: Dual-path Representation Enhancement and Alignment Model, a novel multimodal framework that addresses these limitations through enhanced visual and textual encoding. DREAM incorporates a hybrid language modeling strategy that combines masked and permuted language modeling objectives to capture both local and global linguistic semantics. On the visual side, we design a hierarchical vision encoder with cascaded group attention, which integrates spatial and temporal information through multi-stage token interaction and coarse-to-fine attention refinement. We validate DREAM through comprehensive evaluations on the widely-used MSRVTT, MSVD and LSMDC benchmark datasets, where it achieves new state-of-the-art R1 scores of 49.4%, 49.7% and 27.3%, respectively. Qualitative analyses further show the model's ability to maintain coherent attention across frames and align complex queries with dynamic video content. These findings underscore the effectiveness of hierarchical attention and dual-objective textual modeling in enabling robust, context-aware video retrieval, and pave the way for future research in advancing cross-modal representation learning.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces DREAM, a multimodal framework for cross-modal video retrieval. It proposes a hybrid language modeling strategy that combines masked and permuted language modeling objectives, along with a hierarchical vision encoder using cascaded group attention for integrating spatial and temporal information. The central claim is that DREAM achieves new state-of-the-art R@1 scores of 49.4% on MSRVTT, 49.7% on MSVD, and 27.3% on LSMDC.

Significance. If the reported gains hold under standard evaluation protocols and are attributable to the proposed architectural choices, the work could advance fine-grained temporal modeling and cross-modal alignment in video-language retrieval.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim of new state-of-the-art R@1 scores is presented without any supporting experimental details, ablations, error bars, baseline comparisons, or method implementation specifics; the central performance assertion cannot be evaluated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim of new state-of-the-art R@1 scores is presented without any supporting experimental details, ablations, error bars, baseline comparisons, or method implementation specifics; the central performance assertion cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract is a concise summary and therefore omits the full experimental details, ablations, error bars, baseline tables, and implementation specifics; this is standard for abstracts due to space limits. The central performance claims are supported in the full manuscript: Section 4 details the evaluation protocol on MSRVTT, MSVD, and LSMDC (including standard splits, metrics, and baselines), Section 4.3 and the appendix provide ablations on the dual-objective language modeling and cascaded group attention, and implementation details appear in Section 3.4 and the supplementary material. The assertion can therefore be evaluated from the complete paper. If desired, we can add one sentence to the abstract referencing the three benchmarks and the fact that results are reported under standard protocols. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper describes an empirical multimodal architecture (hybrid language modeling + hierarchical vision encoder) and reports benchmark R@1 scores without any equations, derivations, or first-principles claims. No self-definitional reductions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or model description. The central claims rest on standard cross-modal retrieval evaluation rather than any internal chain that collapses to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5808 in / 1145 out tokens · 32827 ms · 2026-06-26T21:32:26.339307+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Video understanding with large language models: A survey,

    Y . Tang, J. Bi, S. Xu, L. Song, S. Liang, T. Wang, D. Zhang, J. An, J. Lin, R. Zhuet al., “Video understanding with large language models: A survey,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2025

    2025

  2. [2]

    Mvp-shot: Multi-velocity progressive-alignment framework for few-shot action recognition,

    H. Qu, R. Yan, X. Shu, H. Gao, P. Huang, and G.-S. Xie, “Mvp-shot: Multi-velocity progressive-alignment framework for few-shot action recognition,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2025

    2025

  3. [3]

    Multi-modal reference learning for fine-grained text-to-image retrieval,

    Z. Ma, H. Chen, W. Zeng, L. Su, and S. Zhang, “Multi-modal reference learning for fine-grained text-to-image retrieval,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    Clip4clip: An empirical study of clip for end to end video clip retrieval and captioning,

    H. Luo, L. Ji, M. Zhong, Y . Chen, W. Lei, N. Duan, and T. Li, “Clip4clip: An empirical study of clip for end to end video clip retrieval and captioning,”Neurocomputing, vol. 508, pp. 293–304, 2022

    2022

  5. [5]

    Mv-adapter: Multimodal video transfer learning for video text retrieval,

    X. Jin, B. Zhang, W. Gong, K. Xu, X. Deng, P. Wang, Z. Zhang, X. Shen, and J. Feng, “Mv-adapter: Multimodal video transfer learning for video text retrieval,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 27 144–27 153

    2024

  6. [6]

    Vilt-clip: Video and language tuning clip with multimodal prompt learning and scenario-guided optimization,

    H. Wang, F. Liu, L. Jiao, J. Wang, Z. Hao, S. Li, L. Li, P. Chen, and X. Liu, “Vilt-clip: Video and language tuning clip with multimodal prompt learning and scenario-guided optimization,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 6, 2024, pp. 5390–5400

    2024

  7. [7]

    Muse: Mamba is efficient multi-scale learner for text-video retrieval,

    H. Tang, M. Cao, J. Huang, R. Liu, P. Jin, G. Li, and X. Liang, “Muse: Mamba is efficient multi-scale learner for text-video retrieval,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, no. 7, 2025, pp. 7238–7246

    2025

  8. [8]

    Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation,

    J. Li, D. Li, C. Xiong, and S. Hoi, “Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation,” inInternational conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2022, pp. 12 888–12 900

    2022

  9. [9]

    Bridgetower: Building bridges between encoders in vision-language representation learning,

    X. Xu, C. Wu, S. Rosenman, V . Lal, W. Che, and N. Duan, “Bridgetower: Building bridges between encoders in vision-language representation learning,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intel- ligence, vol. 37, no. 9, 2023, pp. 10 637–10 647

    2023

  10. [10]

    Long-clip: Unlocking the long-text capability of clip,

    B. Zhang, P. Zhang, X. Dong, Y . Zang, and J. Wang, “Long-clip: Unlocking the long-text capability of clip,” inEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2024, pp. 310–325

    2024

  11. [11]

    Teachtext: Crossmodal generalized distillation for text-video retrieval,

    I. Croitoru, S.-V . Bogolin, M. Leordeanu, H. Jin, A. Zisserman, S. Al- banie, and Y . Liu, “Teachtext: Crossmodal generalized distillation for text-video retrieval,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 11 583–11 593

    2021

  12. [12]

    Multi modal semantic indexing for image retrieval,

    P. Chandrika and C. Jawahar, “Multi modal semantic indexing for image retrieval,” inProceedings of the ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval, 2010, pp. 342–349

    2010

  13. [13]

    Towards improving canonical correlation analysis for cross-modal retrieval,

    J. Shao, Z. Zhao, F. Su, and T. Yue, “Towards improving canonical correlation analysis for cross-modal retrieval,” inProceedings of the on Thematic Workshops of ACM Multimedia 2017, 2017, pp. 332–339

    2017

  14. [14]

    Cross-modality retrieval by joint correlation learning,

    S. Wang, D. Guo, X. Xu, L. Zhuo, and M. Wang, “Cross-modality retrieval by joint correlation learning,”ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), vol. 15, no. 2s, pp. 1–16, 2019

    2019

  15. [15]

    Deep visual-semantic alignments for generating image descriptions,

    A. Karpathy and L. Fei-Fei, “Deep visual-semantic alignments for generating image descriptions,” inProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2015, pp. 3128–3137

    2015

  16. [16]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clarket al., “Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,” inInternational conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2021, pp. 8748–8763

    2021

  17. [17]

    Two-stream convolutional networks for action recognition in videos,

    K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, “Two-stream convolutional networks for action recognition in videos,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 27, 2014

    2014

  18. [18]

    Learning spatiotemporal features with 3d convolutional networks,

    D. Tran, L. Bourdev, R. Fergus, L. Torresani, and M. Paluri, “Learning spatiotemporal features with 3d convolutional networks,” inProceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2015, pp. 4489–4497

    2015

  19. [19]

    Is space-time attention all you need for video understanding?

    G. Bertasius, H. Wang, and L. Torresani, “Is space-time attention all you need for video understanding?” inICML, vol. 2, no. 3, 2021, p. 4

    2021

  20. [20]

    Ump: Unified modality-aware prompt tuning for text-video retrieval,

    H. Zhang, P. Zeng, L. Gao, J. Song, and H. T. Shen, “Ump: Unified modality-aware prompt tuning for text-video retrieval,”IEEE Transac- tions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2024

    2024

  21. [21]

    Enhancing text-video retrieval performance with low-salient but discriminative objects,

    Y . Zheng, B. Huang, Z. Chen, and D. Yu, “Enhancing text-video retrieval performance with low-salient but discriminative objects,”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2025

    2025

  22. [22]

    Xlnet: Generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding,

    Z. Yang, Z. Dai, Y . Yang, J. Carbonell, R. R. Salakhutdinov, and Q. V . Le, “Xlnet: Generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 32, 2019

    2019

  23. [23]

    PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library

    A. Paszke, “Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learn- ing library,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.01703, 2019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1912

  24. [24]

    Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    Msr-vtt: A large video description dataset for bridging video and language,

    J. Xu, T. Mei, T. Yao, and Y . Rui, “Msr-vtt: A large video description dataset for bridging video and language,” inProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, pp. 5288– 5296

    2016

  26. [26]

    Collecting highly parallel data for paraphrase evaluation,

    D. Chen and W. B. Dolan, “Collecting highly parallel data for paraphrase evaluation,” inProceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, 2011, pp. 190–200

    2011

  27. [27]

    The long-short story of movie description,

    A. Rohrbach, M. Rohrbach, and B. Schiele, “The long-short story of movie description,” inGerman conference on pattern recognition. Springer, 2015, pp. 209–221

    2015

  28. [28]

    A joint sequence fusion model for video question answering and retrieval,

    Y . Yu, J. Kim, and G. Kim, “A joint sequence fusion model for video question answering and retrieval,” inProceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), 2018, pp. 471–487

    2018

  29. [29]

    End-to-end concept word detection for video captioning, retrieval, and question answering,

    Y . Yu, H. Ko, J. Choi, and G. Kim, “End-to-end concept word detection for video captioning, retrieval, and question answering,” inProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017, pp. 3165–3173

    2017

  30. [30]

    A joint sequence fusion model for video question answering and retrieval,

    Y . Yu, J. Kim, and G. Kim, “A joint sequence fusion model for video question answering and retrieval,” inProceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), September 2018

    2018

  31. [31]

    Use what you have: Video retrieval using representations from collaborative experts,

    Y . Liu, S. Albanie, A. Nagrani, and A. Zisserman, “Use what you have: Video retrieval using representations from collaborative experts,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.13487, 2019

    work page arXiv 1907

  32. [32]

    Multi-modal transformer for video retrieval,

    V . Gabeur, C. Sun, K. Alahari, and C. Schmid, “Multi-modal transformer for video retrieval,” inEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2020, pp. 214–229

    2020

  33. [33]

    Teachtext: Crossmodal generalized distillation for text-video retrieval,

    I. Croitoru, S.-V . Bogolin, M. Leordeanu, H. Jin, A. Zisserman, S. Al- banie, and Y . Liu, “Teachtext: Crossmodal generalized distillation for text-video retrieval,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), October 2021, pp. 11 583– 11 593

    2021

  34. [34]

    Text-video retrieval method based on enhanced self-attention and multi-task learning,

    X. Wu, J. Qian, and T. Wang, “Text-video retrieval method based on enhanced self-attention and multi-task learning,”Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 82, no. 16, pp. 24 387–24 406, 2023

    2023

  35. [35]

    Complementarity- aware space learning for video-text retrieval,

    J. Zhu, P. Zeng, L. Gao, G. Li, D. Liao, and J. Song, “Complementarity- aware space learning for video-text retrieval,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 4362– 4374, 2023. 14

    2023

  36. [36]

    Align and tell: Boosting text-video retrieval with local alignment and fine-grained supervision,

    X. Wang, L. Zhu, Z. Zheng, M. Xu, and Y . Yang, “Align and tell: Boosting text-video retrieval with local alignment and fine-grained supervision,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 25, pp. 6079–6089, 2022

    2022

  37. [37]

    Text-guided distillation learning to di- versify video embeddings for text-video retrieval,

    S. Lee, H.-I. Kim, and Y . M. Ro, “Text-guided distillation learning to di- versify video embeddings for text-video retrieval,”Pattern Recognition, vol. 156, p. 110754, 2024

    2024

  38. [38]

    Cross-modal adapter for vision–language retrieval,

    H. Jiang, J. Zhang, R. Huang, C. Ge, Z. Ni, S. Song, and G. Huang, “Cross-modal adapter for vision–language retrieval,”Pattern Recogni- tion, vol. 159, p. 111144, 2025

    2025

  39. [39]

    Htvr: Hierarchical text- to-video retrieval based on relative similarity,

    D. Zhang, Z. Wang, Z. Hu, and X.-J. Wu, “Htvr: Hierarchical text- to-video retrieval based on relative similarity,”Pattern Recognition, p. 112145, 2025

    2025

  40. [40]

    Videoaligner: Text-driven feature decomposition for precise video-text alignment,

    Z. Feng, S. Mao, Y . Wang, and S. Zhang, “Videoaligner: Text-driven feature decomposition for precise video-text alignment,”Pattern Recog- nition, p. 113971, 2026

    2026

  41. [41]

    VSE++: Improving Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Hard Negatives

    F. Faghri, D. J. Fleet, J. R. Kiros, and S. Fidler, “Vse++: Improv- ing visual-semantic embeddings with hard negatives,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.05612, 2017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Learning joint embedding with multimodal cues for cross-modal video-text re- trieval,

    N. C. Mithun, J. Li, F. Metze, and A. K. Roy-Chowdhury, “Learning joint embedding with multimodal cues for cross-modal video-text re- trieval,” inProceedings of the 2018 ACM on international conference on multimedia retrieval, 2018, pp. 19–27

    2018

  43. [43]

    Cross modal retrieval with querybank normalisation,

    S.-V . Bogolin, I. Croitoru, H. Jin, Y . Liu, and S. Albanie, “Cross modal retrieval with querybank normalisation,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 5194–5205

    2022