Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CLIP-DPO: Vision-Language Models as a Source of Preference for Fixing Hallucinations in LVLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.10433 v1 pith:OMLEIK4V submitted 2024-08-19 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords modelslvlmsclip-dpoclipdatadeploymentdpo-basedfine-tuning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite recent successes, LVLMs or Large Vision Language Models are prone to hallucinating details like objects and their properties or relations, limiting their real-world deployment. To address this and improve their robustness, we present CLIP-DPO, a preference optimization method that leverages contrastively pre-trained Vision-Language (VL) embedding models, such as CLIP, for DPO-based optimization of LVLMs. Unlike prior works tackling LVLM hallucinations, our method does not rely on paid-for APIs, and does not require additional training data or the deployment of other external LVLMs. Instead, starting from the initial pool of supervised fine-tuning data, we generate a diverse set of predictions, which are ranked based on their CLIP image-text similarities, and then filtered using a robust rule-based approach to obtain a set of positive and negative pairs for DPO-based training. We applied CLIP-DPO fine-tuning to the MobileVLM-v2 family of models and to LlaVA-1.5, in all cases observing significant improvements in terms of hallucination reduction over baseline models. We also observe better performance for zero-shot classification, suggesting improved grounding capabilities, and verify that the original performance on standard LVLM benchmarks is overall preserved.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CheXPO: Preference Optimization for Chest X-ray VLMs with Counterfactual Rationale

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A preference optimization strategy using confidence-based hard example mining, similarity retrieval, and synthetic counterfactual rationales improves chest X-ray VQA accuracy by 8.93% relative over supervised fine-tuning.

  2. Do You Keep an Eye on What I Ask? Mitigating Multimodal Hallucination via Attention-Guided Ensemble Decoding

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Ensemble Decoding reduces object hallucination in large vision-language models by ensembling logits from attention-weighted image sub-images.

  3. Energy-Guided Decoding for Object Hallucination Mitigation

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An energy-guided, training-free decoding rule that chooses the layer with minimal energy reduces object hallucination and yes-bias on several benchmarks.

Pith tools