Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Text2SQL is Not Enough: Unifying AI and Databases with TAG

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.14717 v1 pith:OMNAOL4B submitted 2024-08-27 cs.DB cs.AI

classification cs.DBcs.AI
keywords languagequestionsdatanaturalcapabilitiesdatabasesmethodssystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

AI systems that serve natural language questions over databases promise to unlock tremendous value. Such systems would allow users to leverage the powerful reasoning and knowledge capabilities of language models (LMs) alongside the scalable computational power of data management systems. These combined capabilities would empower users to ask arbitrary natural language questions over custom data sources. However, existing methods and benchmarks insufficiently explore this setting. Text2SQL methods focus solely on natural language questions that can be expressed in relational algebra, representing a small subset of the questions real users wish to ask. Likewise, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) considers the limited subset of queries that can be answered with point lookups to one or a few data records within the database. We propose Table-Augmented Generation (TAG), a unified and general-purpose paradigm for answering natural language questions over databases. The TAG model represents a wide range of interactions between the LM and database that have been previously unexplored and creates exciting research opportunities for leveraging the world knowledge and reasoning capabilities of LMs over data. We systematically develop benchmarks to study the TAG problem and find that standard methods answer no more than 20% of queries correctly, confirming the need for further research in this area. We release code for the benchmark at https://github.com/TAG-Research/TAG-Bench.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Vortex: Overcoming Memory Capacity Limitations in GPU-Accelerated Large-Scale Data Analytics

    cs.DB 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    By routing data through idle IO paths of neighboring GPUs, Vortex lets a single GPU run analytics on datasets exceeding its memory at 140GB/s aggregate transfer and beats CPU baselines.

  2. LLM-based Question-Answer Framework for Sensor-driven HVAC System Interaction

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    JARVIS, an LLM-based HVAC question-answering framework with an Expert-LLM, a parameterized SQL builder, and bottom-up planning, outperforms a text-to-SQL baseline and its own ablations on a small expert-curated dataset.

  3. NeuSym-RAG: Hybrid Neural Symbolic Retrieval with Multiview Structuring for PDF Question Answering

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    NeuSym-RAG combines SQL-based symbolic retrieval with neural vector search in an iterative LLM agent, using multi-view PDF parsing, and reports large gains over simple RAG baselines on full-paper QA.

  4. HyST: LLM-Powered Hybrid Retrieval over Semi-Structured Tabular Data

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A hybrid retrieval system that combines LLM-generated attribute filters with embedding search outperforms several baselines on a small, curated semi-structured product benchmark.

Pith tools