Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Short vs Long and Collapsars vs. non-Collapsar: a quantitative classification of GRBs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1210.0068 v1 pith:OMZBVX2N submitted 2012-09-29 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords collapsarsshortburstsdurationnon-collapsarnon-collapsarsswiftburst
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) are traditionally divided to long and short according to their durations (>/< 2 sec). It was generally believed that this reflects a different physical origin: Collapsars (long) and non-Collapsars (short). We have recently shown that the duration distribution of Collapsars is flat, namely independent of the duration, at short durations. Using this model for the distribution of Collapsars we determine the duration distribution of non-Collapsars and estimate the probability that a burst with a given duration (and hardness) is a Collapsar or not. We find that this probability depends strongly on the spectral window of the observing detector. While the commonly used limit of 2 sec is conservative and suitable for BATSE bursts, 40% of swift's bursts shorter than 2 sec are Collapsars and division >/<0.8 sec is more suitable for swift. We find that the duration overlap of the two populations is very large. On the one hand there is a non-negligible fraction of non-Collapsars longer than 10 sec, while on the other hand even bursts shorter than 0.5 sec in the swift sample have a non-negligible probability to be Collapsars. Our results enable the construction of non-Collapsar samples while controlling the Collapsar contamination. They also highlight that no firm conclusions can be drawn based on a single burst and they have numerous implications concerning previous studies of non-Collapsar properties that were based on the current significantly contaminated swift samples of localized short GRBs. Specifically: (i) all known short bursts with z>1 are most likely Collapsars, (ii) the only short burst with a clear jet break is most likely a Collapsar, indicating our lack of knowledge concerning non-Collapsar beaming (iii) the existence of non-Collapsars with durations up to 10 sec impose new challenges to non-Collapsar models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gamma-ray burst progenitors revisited

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    About 30–40% of long gamma-ray bursts at z<0.3 lack supernova emission and likely arise from compact object mergers, at rates comparable to short GRBs.

  2. Early Multiwavelength Observations of AT 2026fgk: The Luminous Afterglow to Sub-luminous GRB 260310A, Identified Independently of a Gamma-ray Trigger

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    First blind optical identification of a z=0.153 sub-luminous GRB afterglow with Ic-BL SN, yielding a volumetric rate consistent with on-axis high-luminosity long GRBs.

Pith tools