Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparison of two approximation schemes for solving perturbations in a LTB cosmological model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1407.4899 v2 pith:OOJ3VODY submitted 2014-07-18 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

classification astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords modelassumptioncosmologicalperturbationsapproachesclarkson-clifton-februarylemaitre-tolman-bondiperturbation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, the present authors studied perturbations in the Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi cosmological model by applying the second-order perturbation theory in the dust Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker universe model. Before this work, the same subject was studied in some papers by analyzing linear perturbations in the Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi cosmological model under the assumption proposed by Clarkson, Clifton and February, in which two of perturbation variables are negligible. However, it is a non-trivial issue in what situation the Clarkson-Clifton-February assumption is valid. In this paper, we investigate differences between these two approaches. It is shown that, in general, these two approaches are not compatible with each other. That is, in our perturbative procedure, the Clarkson-Clifton-February assumption is not valid at the order of our interest.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools