Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adversarial training applied to Convolutional Neural Network for photometric redshift predictions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.10154 v1 pith:OOW6WGWK submitted 2020-02-24 astro-ph.IM eess.IV

classification astro-ph.IMeess.IV
keywords adversarialmodeltrainingappliedonlyredshiftbeenconvolutional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The use of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to estimate the galaxy photometric redshift probability distribution by analysing the images in different wavelength bands has been developed in the recent years thanks to the rapid development of the Machine Learning (ML) ecosystem. Authors have set-up CNN architectures and studied their performances and some sources of systematics using standard methods of training and testing to ensure the generalisation power of their models. So far so good, but one piece was missing : does the model generalisation power is well measured? The present article shows clearly that very small image perturbations can fool the model completely and opens the Pandora's box of \textit{adversarial} attack. Among the different techniques and scenarios, we have chosen to use the Fast Sign Gradient one-step Method and its Projected Gradient Descent iterative extension as adversarial generator tool kit. However, as unlikely as it may seem these adversarial samples which fool not only a single model, reveal a weakness both of the model and the classical training. A revisited algorithm is shown and applied by injecting a fraction of adversarial samples during the training phase. Numerical experiments have been conducted using a specific CNN model for illustration although our study could be applied to other models - not only CNN ones - and in other contexts - not only redshift measurements - as it deals with the complexity of the boundary decision surface.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DeepDISC-photoz: Deep Learning-Based Photometric Redshift Estimation for Rubin LSST

    astro-ph.IM 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DeepDISC photo-z, an instance-segmentation network with a mixture-density redshift head, produces better photometric redshifts than catalog-based BPZ and FlexZBoost on simulated Rubin LSST images.

Pith tools