Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 66 references

This paper claims that reflection-based black-hole spin measurements can be made trustworthy through a transparent, reproducible quality framework built on detectability, uniqueness, and robustness, and proposes a tiered A/B/C/U classificat

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 02:16 UTC pith:OOYQL2JK

load-bearing objection A useful, well-packaged framework proposal for rating reflection-based spin measurements, with the key caveat that its robustness gate is tested only within the authors' own model family. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14368 v1 pith:OOYQL2JK submitted 2026-07-15 astro-ph.HE

Black-Hole Spin Measurements from X-ray Reflection Spectroscopy: Quality Criteria and Community Recommendations

Javier A. Garcia , Riley Connors , Laura W. Brenneman , James F. Steiner This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords black-hole spinX-ray reflection spectroscopyrelativistic reflectionFe K emissionaccretion disksquality criteriaspin compilationX-ray binaries and AGN
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the field of X-ray reflection spectroscopy needs a transparent, reproducible way to decide whether a published black-hole spin value is trustworthy. It proposes a three-pillar framework—detectability, uniqueness, robustness—and translates it into six binary quality filters used to label each measurement as Tier A (high-confidence), Tier B (usable with enlarged systematics), Tier C (provisional or red-flagged), or Tier U (not assessable from the publication). The central move is to make quality assessment a property of the measurement, not the source or the paper, and to base it only on published evidence so that failures can be traced. If adopted, the scheme would enable a community-maintained compilation of reliable spins for population studies, gravitational-wave comparisons, and mission planning. The authors are explicit that quantitative thresholds require a simulation campaign deferred to a companion paper.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the proposal is a regulatory standard: a reflection-based spin value should count as reliable only when (1) relativistic reflection is significantly detected, (2) the observing band covers both the iron-K region and the hard continuum/Compton hump, (3) detector or calibration systematics do not dominate, (4) the accretion state is compatible with assuming the disk reaches the innermost stable circular orbit, (5) the model choices are not too restrictive for the data, and (6) the statistical reporting is complete. The load-bearing claim is that measurements failing any of these binary filters should be excluded from high-confidence compilations unless mitigation is c

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a two-stage assessment: three pillars—detectability, uniqueness, and robustness—define what a trustworthy measurement must satisfy, and six binary filters carry those pillars into practice and feed a four-tier classification (A/B/C/U). The uniqueness pillar anchors the scheme: the relativistic reflection component must be separable from continuum, distant reflection, absorption, and instrumental features. The tier labels are assigned to source-observation-model combinations, not to papers or sources, and require an editorial review process for deciding whether mitigations are convincing. The paper also supplies a nine-item reporting checklist designed to make future

Load-bearing premise

A spin value that is stable across the set of model variants a study happens to try is treated as close to the true spin; if every tried variant shares the same hidden error, a measurement can pass every check and still be wrong.

What would settle it

Generate synthetic spectra with a physically different reflection code—different atomic data or radiative-transfer treatment—with known input spins, run them through the proposed filters, and check whether any spectra assigned Tier A recover the wrong spin; a single such case would show that passing all six criteria does not guarantee reliability.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If adopted, published spin values can be filtered into a curated, versioned compilation whose Tier A entries are safe for population studies and mission forecasts.
  • Spin measurements that fail a critical criterion (detectability or instrumental systematics) will be excluded from high-confidence use even if their statistical error bars are small.
  • Future reflection spectroscopy analyses will need to report pile-up budgets, passband coverage, state diagnostics, and covariance contours as standard practice.
  • Comparisons between electromagnetic spins and gravitational-wave spin distributions will rest on a defined population rather than an ad hoc literature sample.
  • The framework's quantitative thresholds are explicitly not universal constants; they must be derived from simulations, so the companion calibration determines how strict Tier A actually is.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An unstated consequence is that the robustness pillar can certify a spin only relative to the model variants a study chooses to explore; if those variants share a single wrong assumption, such as the same atomic database or illumination geometry, a Tier A label could still sit on a biased value.
  • A practical extension would be to apply the filters to a retrospective sample of published measurements and compare the resulting Tier A spins with independent constraints, which would test whether the labels track accuracy rather than merely self-consistency.
  • The same binary-filter logic could be adapted to other derived quantities in X-ray spectroscopy, such as disk inclination or iron abundance, wherever 'detectable, separable, stable' are the relevant requirements.
  • The 'not assessable' tier may turn out to be the most populated category among older measurements, since the reporting checklist demands information many past papers do not provide; that would be a finding about the literature, not about the underlying spin values.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a community quality-control framework for evaluating published black-hole spin measurements obtained from X-ray reflection spectroscopy. It organizes the problem around three pillars—detectability, uniqueness/separability, and robustness—and translates them into six binary filtering criteria (Sections 4.1–4.6), a four-tier classification scheme (Tier A/B/C/U, Section 5), and a detailed reporting checklist for future analyses (Section 6). The authors explicitly state that quantitative thresholds require calibration and defer this to a companion paper; the two demonstration simulations (Figures 2–3) illustrate how signal-to-noise and coronal geometry can make a zero-spin model mimic high-spin data. The paper is written as a synthesis of a 2025 workshop and does not remeasure any spins or compile a catalog, but rather proposes the structure for a future curated, community-maintained spin compilation.

Significance. If adopted, the framework could provide a much-needed reproducible standard for compiling reflection-based spin measurements and for comparing electromagnetic constraints with gravitational-wave spin distributions. The paper is unusually transparent about its own limitations: it explicitly defers calibration, distinguishes statistical precision from systematic accuracy, and includes a 'not assessable' tier that prevents silent exclusion of uncertain measurements. The reporting checklist and the mapping of known degeneracies (warm-absorber, pile-up, iron-abundance, disk-density) onto specific criteria are concrete and useful. However, the central reliability proxy—robustness across model variants—is only demonstrated within a single model family (relxill/xillver), and the demo simulations lack a goodness-of-fit comparison with the true model. These gaps mean that the Tier A label, as currently defined, is not yet a validated indicator of physical accuracy.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5 and Sec. 3.3/checklist item 7] The Tier A criterion requires the spin to be 'stable under plausible model variants,' and the operational variants listed in checklist item 7 (emissivity, coronal geometry, disk density, iron abundance, ionization, inclination, cutoff, inner radius) are all parameters or flavors within the relxill/xillver family. If these models share a common systematic error (e.g., plane-parallel atmosphere, a specific atomic database, or the lamppost geometry), every variant carries the same bias and a Tier A label could certify a systematically offset spin. The paper's own Sec. 7 fourth simulation set acknowledges this ('GRMHD-based disk structures') but presents no such test. Either add a model-family systematics gate or explicitly reframe Tier A as 'robust within the tested model class' and soften the claim that Tier A measurements are 'appropriate for population studies and mission-level forecasts
  2. [Sec. 7, Figures 2 and 3] The demonstration fits only the Schwarzschild (zero-spin) model to simulated maximal-spin NuSTAR spectra and reports large χ² values, but never shows the fit statistic of the true model on the same data. Without that comparison, the reader cannot tell whether the residuals are due to the wrong spin model or to any other simulation/fitting artifact. Moreover, the stated conclusion that 'once the S/N falls to the order of hundreds, one can reproduce the data well with a zero-spin model' is not supported by the quoted numbers: at S/N=340, χ²/dof = 236/185 = 1.28, which for 185 degrees of freedom corresponds to a p-value of roughly 0.004; at S/N=110, χ²/dof = 160/156 = 1.03 is indeed acceptable, but the transition is sharper than implied. Similarly, in Figure 3 the h=20 R_h case (χ²/dof = 314/253 = 1.24) is rejected at p≈0.003. Please report the true-model fit statistic and pre-specify an ac
  3. [Sec. 4.2 vs. Sec. 7] Section 4.2 gives concrete numerical guidelines: '≳20 background-subtracted counts per spectral bin' for χ² fitting and 'of order one source count per channel' for Poisson-based statistics. Section 7, however, states that thresholds 'must be derived rather than asserted' and warns that 'quoting a single uncalibrated set of numbers would risk those values acquiring unearned authority.' These two positions are in direct tension. Unless the Section 4.2 numbers are explicitly labeled as provisional placeholders subject to the companion-paper calibration, the framework is internally inconsistent about the status of its own quantitative criteria. Please reconcile by marking the numbers as illustrative or by providing a derivation or citation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript uses both 'not assessable' and 'non-assessable' (e.g., Abstract vs. Sections 4 and 5). Standardize on one term.
  2. [Figures 2 and 3] The y-axis label 'Ratios' is ambiguous. Specify that these are data/model ratios and state the reference model (e.g., ratio to a particular continuum+reflection model) in the caption. The χ²/DoF notation is nonstandard; use χ²/dof consistently.
  3. [Sec. 5] The Tier B/Tier C boundary is not fully specified: Tier B permits 'at most two non-critical criteria' failures if 'each' has a documented mitigation, while Tier C is triggered by 'more than two' failures. It is unclear what label applies when a measurement fails two non-critical criteria and mitigates only one, or when a criterion cannot be evaluated but is non-critical. A short decision tree or truth table would remove ambiguity.
  4. [Section 4.2] The parenthetical introducing the '≳20 counts per bin' rule is very long and hard to parse. Consider moving operational thresholds to a table and leaving the main text at the level of the physical requirement.
  5. [References] Several reference IDs appear malformed (e.g., reference [1] contains 'astro-ph/astro-ph/9901296'). Please clean up the bibliography formatting.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity found; the paper is a quality-control proposal with self-contained recovery tests and explicitly deferred calibration.

full rationale

The paper does not present a derivation chain that reduces to its own inputs. Section 4 states its criteria as normative filters ('We propose the following criteria as binary filters to identify problematic measurements'), not as results derived from data or from an assumed model. The demonstration tests in Figures 2-3 are synthetic recovery/identifiability experiments: spectra are simulated from a known spin and then fit with a zero-spin model to illustrate detectability limitations; no fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction. The quantitative thresholds are explicitly not asserted: Section 7 says the relevant quantities 'are not universal constants' and that thresholds 'must be derived rather than asserted,' with calibration deferred to a companion paper. The only substantive concern—that the robustness tests in checklist item 7 vary parameters within the authors' relxill/xillver family rather than testing independent model physics—is acknowledged in the paper itself, which proposes a fourth simulation set using GRMHD-based synthetic spectra ('Synthetic spectra generated from high-density disks, non-lamppost illumination, ionization gradients, finite disk thickness, or GRMHD-based disk structures should be fit with standard models'). That is a deferred validation gap, not a circular step: the paper does not invoke an unverified self-citation chain to force its central claim, and its model-family self-citations point to public, widely used codes. No step reduces by construction to a fit, definition, or self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper adds no free parameters to a physical derivation; its one hand-chosen threshold is the ≳20 counts/bin passband rule in Sec. 4.2. Its central assumptions are the standard Kerr/ISCO mapping and the fidelity of the RELXILL reflection model family, plus the framework's own assertion that robustness across model variants is a sufficient proxy for accuracy. No new physical entities are introduced. The calibration simulations that would turn the qualitative framework into quantitative thresholds are explicitly deferred to a companion paper.

free parameters (1)
  • Minimum count threshold in passband criterion = ≳20 background-subtracted counts per spectral bin (χ² fitting)
    Hand-chosen practical guideline in Sec. 4.2 for the hard-band coverage criterion; not derived from the calibration simulations, which are deferred.
axioms (4)
  • standard math The Kerr spacetime and ISCO mapping: the inner disk radius is tied to the ISCO, whose radius is a monotonic function of a*
    Invoked in Sec. 1 and Sec. 4.4; the entire reflection method assumes the disk is optically thick and extends to (or its truncation is separately modeled from) the ISCO.
  • domain assumption Reflection models (RELXILL/XILLVER) provide a sufficiently accurate spectral description of disk reflection
    All framework criteria and the demo simulations (Figs. 2–3) are generated with and fitted by RELXILL-family models; model error is not independently calibrated.
  • standard math Fit statistics (Δχ², ΔC-stat, Bayesian evidence) validly rank competing spectral models
    Used in Sec. 4.1 to define detectability; assumes these statistics behave as intended with the small-count Poisson data discussed in Sec. 4.2.
  • ad hoc to paper Robustness across a set of chosen model variants is a sufficient proxy for measurement accuracy
    Introduced in Sec. 3.3 and enforced in Sec. 5 (Tier A requires robustness checks). This is the framework's own assertion, not established by prior work.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 19265 in / 15298 out tokens · 143593 ms · 2026-08-02T02:16:47.780631+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

X-ray reflection spectroscopy provides one of the most powerful electromagnetic methods for measuring the dimensionless spin of accreting black holes. It has yielded spin constraints for stellar-mass black holes in X-ray binaries and supermassive black holes in active galactic nuclei, and is central to the science goals of current and future X-ray observatories. However, the technique is subject to observational and modeling systematics, including continuum-reflection degeneracy, limited spectral coverage, unresolved distant reflection or absorption, detector effects, source variability, accretion-state dependence, and assumptions inherent to reflection models. Motivated by discussions at the 2025 Wake Forest workshop *Recent Progress on Black Hole Spin Measurements Across the Electromagnetic and Gravitational Spectra*, we propose a practical framework for evaluating whether published reflection-based spin measurements should be considered robust, provisional, or not assessable from the available information. The framework is built on three principles: **detectability**, requiring an unambiguous relativistic reflection signal; **uniqueness**, requiring that the relativistic component be distinguishable from the continuum, distant reflection, absorption, and instrumental effects; and **robustness**, requiring that the inferred spin remain stable against reasonable changes in model assumptions, data selection, and accretion-state treatment. We translate these principles into assessment criteria, a quality-classification scheme, and a reporting checklist for future studies. Calibration of these criteria through dedicated simulations is outlined here and deferred to a companion paper. Our goal is to establish a reproducible path toward a community-maintained compilation of reliable black hole spin measurements for the high-throughput, high-resolution era of X-ray astronomy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14368 by James F. Steiner, Javier A. Garcia, Laura W. Brenneman, Riley Connors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Concept of X-ray reflection spectroscopy. Hard X-rays from a compact corona illuminate an optically thick accretion disk, producing a reflection spectrum with fluorescent lines (notably Fe K-shell transitions) and a Compton hump due to electron scattering. Relativistic Doppler shifts, gravitational redshift, and light bending imprint characteristic broadening that constrains the inner disk radius (ISCO), e… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Ratio spectra of fits of Schwarzschild solutions (a∗ = 0) to simulated NuSTAR spectra based on maximal intrinsic spin (a∗ = 0.998). The simulated spectra are all based upon an exposure time of 20 ks, but at variable intrinsic source flux [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Ratio spectra of fits of Schwarzschild solutions (a∗ = 0) to simulated NuSTAR spectra based on maximal intrinsic spin (a∗ = 0.998). The simulated spectra are all based upon an exposure time of 20 ks, but at variable intrinsic lamppost height (specified in terms of the horizon radius, Rh ), and by association, both reflection fraction and emissivity across the accretion disk. The intrinsic (2 − 10 keV) sour… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The evolution of black hole mass and angular momentum.MNRAS1999, 305, 654–660, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9901296]

    King, A.R.; Kolb, U. The evolution of black hole mass and angular momentum.MNRAS1999, 305, 654–660, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9901296]. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.0 2482.x

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  2. [2]

    Most Black Holes Are Born Very Slowly Rotating.ApJ2019,881, L1, [arXiv:astro- ph.SR/1907.03714]

    Fuller, J.; Ma, L. Most Black Holes Are Born Very Slowly Rotating.ApJ2019,881, L1, [arXiv:astro- ph.SR/1907.03714]. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab339b

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907

  3. [3]

    The spin of the second-born black hole in coalescing binary black holes.A&A2018,616, A28, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/1802.05738]

    Qin, Y.; Fragos, T.; Meynet, G.; Andrews, J.; Sørensen, M.; Song, H.F. The spin of the second-born black hole in coalescing binary black holes.A&A2018,616, A28, [arXiv:astro-ph.SR/1802.05738]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832839

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    The Origin of Black Hole Spin in Galactic Low-mass X-Ray Binaries

    Fragos, T.; McClintock, J.E. The Origin of Black Hole Spin in Galactic Low-mass X-Ray Binaries. ApJ2015,800, 17, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1408.2661]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/ 17

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    The masses and spins of neutron stars and stellar-mass black holes

    Miller, M.C.; Miller, J.M. The masses and spins of neutron stars and stellar-mass black holes. Phys. Rep.2015,548, 1–34, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1408.4145]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep. 2014.09.003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    The Distribution and Cosmic Evolution of Massive Black Hole Spins.ApJ2005,620, 69–77, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0410342]

    Volonteri, M.; Madau, P .; Quataert, E.; Rees, M.J. The Distribution and Cosmic Evolution of Massive Black Hole Spins.ApJ2005,620, 69–77, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0410342]. https: //doi.org/10.1086/426858

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Growing supermassive black holes by chaotic accretion.MNRAS2006, 373, L90–L92, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0609598]

    King, A.R.; Pringle, J.E. Growing supermassive black holes by chaotic accretion.MNRAS2006, 373, L90–L92, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0609598]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.0 0249.x

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    Cosmological Black Hole Spin Evolution by Mergers and Accretion.ApJ 2008,684, 822–828, [arXiv:astro-ph/0802.0025]

    Berti, E.; Volonteri, M. Cosmological Black Hole Spin Evolution by Mergers and Accretion.ApJ 2008,684, 822–828, [arXiv:astro-ph/0802.0025]. https://doi.org/10.1086/590379

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  9. [9]

    Linking the Spin Evolution of Massive Black Holes to Galaxy Kinematics.ApJ2014,794, 104, [arXiv:astro-ph.CO/1402.7088]

    Sesana, A.; Barausse, E.; Dotti, M.; Rossi, E.M. Linking the Spin Evolution of Massive Black Holes to Galaxy Kinematics.ApJ2014,794, 104, [arXiv:astro-ph.CO/1402.7088]. https://doi. org/10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/104

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Observational Constraints on Black Hole Spin.ARA&A2021,59, 117–154, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2011.08948]

    Reynolds, C.S. Observational Constraints on Black Hole Spin.ARA&A2021,59, 117–154, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2011.08948]. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-035022

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  11. [11]

    Supermassive Black Holes in X-Rays: From Standard Accretion to Extreme Transients.ARA&A2025,63, 379–430, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2503.22791]

    Kara, E.; García, J. Supermassive Black Holes in X-Rays: From Standard Accretion to Extreme Transients.ARA&A2025,63, 379–430, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2503.22791]. https://doi.org/10.114 6/annurev-astro-071221-052844

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Constraining Black Hole Spin via X-Ray Spectroscopy.ApJ 2006,652, 1028–1043, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0608502]

    Brenneman, L.W.; Reynolds, C.S. Constraining Black Hole Spin via X-Ray Spectroscopy.ApJ 2006,652, 1028–1043, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0608502]. https://doi.org/10.1086/508146

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  13. [13]

    https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7771-6

    Brenneman, L.Measuring the Angular Momentum of Supermassive Black Holes; 2013. https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7771-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7771-6 2013

  14. [14]

    Measuring Black Hole Spin Using X-Ray Reflection Spectroscopy.Space Sci

    Reynolds, C.S. Measuring Black Hole Spin Using X-Ray Reflection Spectroscopy.Space Sci. Rev. 2014,183, 277–294, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1302.3260]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-0006-6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  15. [15]

    X-Ray Reflected Spectra from Accretion Disk Models

    García, J.; Dauser, T.; Reynolds, C.S.; Kallman, T.R.; McClintock, J.E.; Wilms, J.; Eikmann, W. X-Ray Reflected Spectra from Accretion Disk Models. III. A Complete Grid of Ionized Reflection Calculations.ApJ2013,768, 146, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1303.2112]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004 -637X/768/2/146

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Improved Reflection Models of Black Hole Accretion Disks: Treating the Angular Distribution of X-Rays.ApJ2014,782, 76, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1312.3231]

    García, J.; Dauser, T.; Lohfink, A.; Kallman, T.R.; Steiner, J.F.; McClintock, J.E.; Brenneman, L.; Wilms, J.; Eikmann, W.; Reynolds, C.S.; et al. Improved Reflection Models of Black Hole Accretion Disks: Treating the Angular Distribution of X-Rays.ApJ2014,782, 76, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1312.3231]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/76

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    The role of the reflection fraction in constraining black hole spin.MNRAS2014,444, L100–L104, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1408.2347]

    Dauser, T.; Garcia, J.; Parker, M.L.; Fabian, A.C.; Wilms, J. The role of the reflection fraction in constraining black hole spin.MNRAS2014,444, L100–L104, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1408.2347]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slu125

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Normalizing a relativistic model of X-ray reflection

    Dauser, T.; García, J.; Walton, D.J.; Eikmann, W.; Kallman, T.; McClintock, J.; Wilms, J. Normalizing a relativistic model of X-ray reflection. Definition of the reflection fraction https://doi.org/10.3390/1010000 Version July 17, 2026 submitted toJournal Not Specified 17 of 20 and its implementation in relxill.A&A2016,590, A76, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1601.03...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  19. [19]

    Self-consistent Black Hole Accretion Spectral Models and the Forgotten Role of Coronal Comptonization of Reflection Emission.ApJ2017,836, 119, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1701.03777]

    Steiner, J.F.; García, J.A.; Eikmann, W.; McClintock, J.E.; Brenneman, L.W.; Dauser, T.; Fabian, A.C. Self-consistent Black Hole Accretion Spectral Models and the Forgotten Role of Coronal Comptonization of Reflection Emission.ApJ2017,836, 119, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1701.03777]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/119

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Towards Precision Measurements of Accreting Black Holes Using X-Ray Reflection Spectroscopy.Space Sci

    Bambi, C.; Brenneman, L.W.; Dauser, T.; García, J.A.; Grinberg, V .; Ingram, A.; Jiang, J.; Liu, H.; Lohfink, A.M.; Marinucci, A.; et al. Towards Precision Measurements of Accreting Black Holes Using X-Ray Reflection Spectroscopy.Space Sci. Rev.2021,217, 65, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/2011.04792]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-021-00841-8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    The Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) High-energy X-Ray Mission.ApJ2013,770, 103, [arXiv:astro-ph.IM/1301.7307]

    Harrison, F.A.; Craig, W.W.; Christensen, F.E.; Hailey, C.J.; Zhang, W.W.; Boggs, S.E.; Stern, D.; Cook, W.R.; Forster, K.; Giommi, P .; et al. The Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) High-energy X-Ray Mission.ApJ2013,770, 103, [arXiv:astro-ph.IM/1301.7307]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    A Sharper View of the X-Ray Spectrum of MCG–6-30-15 with XRISM, XMM-Newton, and NuSTAR.ApJ2025,995, 200, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/2510.08926]

    Brenneman, L.W.; Wilkins, D.R.; Ogorzałek, A.; Rogantini, D.; Fabian, A.C.; García, J.A.; Jurá ˇ nová, A.; Mizumoto, M.; Noda, H.; Behar, E.; et al. A Sharper View of the X-Ray Spectrum of MCG–6-30-15 with XRISM, XMM-Newton, and NuSTAR.ApJ2025,995, 200, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/2510.08926]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae1225

    arXiv

  23. [23]

    Xrism Collaboration.; Audard, M.; Awaki, H.; Ballhausen, R.; Bamba, A.; Behar, E.; Boissay- Malaquin, R.; Brenneman, L.; Brown, G.V .; Corrales, L.; et al. XRISM Spectroscopy of the Fe Kα Emission Line in the Seyfert Active Galactic Nucleus NGC 4151 Reveals the Disk, Broad-line Region, and Torus.ApJ2024,973, L25, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2408.14300]. https://do...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  24. [24]

    A XRISM View of Relativistic Reflection in Cygnus X-1.ApJ2025,995, L12, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2511.17338]

    Draghis, P .A.; Miller, J.M.; Kara, E.; Costantini, E.; Adegoke, O.; García, J.A. A XRISM View of Relativistic Reflection in Cygnus X-1.ApJ2025,995, L12, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2511.17338]. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ae2276

    arXiv 2041

  25. [25]

    Irradiation of an accretion disc by a jet: general properties and implications for spin measurements of black holes.MNRAS2013,430, 1694–1708, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1301.4922]

    Dauser, T.; Garcia, J.; Wilms, J.; Böck, M.; Brenneman, L.W.; Falanga, M.; Fukumura, K.; Reynolds, C.S. Irradiation of an accretion disc by a jet: general properties and implications for spin measurements of black holes.MNRAS2013,430, 1694–1708, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1301.4922]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts710

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Relativistic reflection within an extended hot plasma geometry.A&A2025,704, A129, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2510.13337]

    Nekrasov, A.D.; Dauser, T.; García, J.A.; Walton, D.J.; Fromm, C.M.; Young, A.J.; Baker, F.J.E.; Joyce, A.M.; König, O.; Licklederer, S.; et al. Relativistic reflection within an extended hot plasma geometry.A&A2025,704, A129, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2510.13337]. https://doi.org/10.1 051/0004-6361/202556012

    arXiv

  27. [27]

    The effects of high density on the X-ray spectrum reflected from accretion discs around black holes.MNRAS2016,462, 751–760, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1603.05259]

    García, J.A.; Fabian, A.C.; Kallman, T.R.; Dauser, T.; Parker, M.L.; McClintock, J.E.; Steiner, J.F.; Wilms, J. The effects of high density on the X-ray spectrum reflected from accretion discs around black holes.MNRAS2016,462, 751–760, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1603.05259]. https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1696

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    Alternative Explanations for Extreme Supersolar Iron Abun- dances Inferred from the Energy Spectrum of Cygnus X-1.ApJ2018,855, 3, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1801.07267]

    Tomsick, J.A.; Parker, M.L.; García, J.A.; Yamaoka, K.; Barret, D.; Chiu, J.L.; Clavel, M.; Fabian, A.; Fürst, F.; Gandhi, P .; et al. Alternative Explanations for Extreme Supersolar Iron Abun- dances Inferred from the Energy Spectrum of Cygnus X-1.ApJ2018,855, 3, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1801.07267]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaaab1

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Origin of the X-ray disc-reflection steep radial emissivity.A&A2012,545, A106, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1208.0360]

    Svoboda, J.; Dovˇ ciak, M.; Goosmann, R.W.; Jethwa, P .; Karas, V .; Miniutti, G.; Guainazzi, M. Origin of the X-ray disc-reflection steep radial emissivity.A&A2012,545, A106, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1208.0360]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219701

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    The Problem of the High Iron Abundance in Accretion Disks around Black Holes

    García, J.A.; Kallman, T.R.; Bautista, M.; Mendoza, C.; Deprince, J.; Palmeri, P .; Quinet, P . The Problem of the High Iron Abundance in Accretion Disks around Black Holes. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Astrophysical Opacities, 2018, Vol. 515,Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, p. 282, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1805.00581]. https://doi.or...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.00581 2018

  31. [31]

    Conflicting Disk Inclination Estimates for the Black Hole X-Ray Binary XTE J1550-564.ApJ2019,882, 179, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1907.12114]

    Connors, R.M.T.; García, J.A.; Steiner, J.F.; Grinberg, V .; Dauser, T.; Sridhar, N.; Gatuzz, E.; Tomsick, J.; Markoff, S.B.; Harrison, F. Conflicting Disk Inclination Estimates for the Black Hole X-Ray Binary XTE J1550-564.ApJ2019,882, 179, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1907.12114]. https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab35df. https://doi.org/10.3390/1010000 Version ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907

  32. [32]

    Exploring the Effects of Disk Thickness on the Black Hole Reflection Spectrum.ApJ2018,855, 120, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1712.05418]

    Taylor, C.; Reynolds, C.S. Exploring the Effects of Disk Thickness on the Black Hole Reflection Spectrum.ApJ2018,855, 120, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1712.05418]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4 357/aaad63

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Evidence for Returning Disk Radiation in the Black Hole X-Ray Binary XTE J1550-564.ApJ2020,892, 47, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2002.11873]

    Connors, R.M.T.; García, J.A.; Dauser, T.; Grinberg, V .; Steiner, J.F.; Sridhar, N.; Wilms, J.; Tomsick, J.; Harrison, F.; Licklederer, S. Evidence for Returning Disk Radiation in the Black Hole X-Ray Binary XTE J1550-564.ApJ2020,892, 47, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2002.11873]. https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab7afc

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  34. [34]

    The effect of returning radiation on relativistic reflection.MNRAS2022,514, 3965–3983, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2206.07973]

    Dauser, T.; García, J.A.; Joyce, A.; Licklederer, S.; Connors, R.M.T.; Ingram, A.; Reynolds, C.S.; Wilms, J. The effect of returning radiation on relativistic reflection.MNRAS2022,514, 3965–3983, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2206.07973]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1593

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    On Estimating the High-energy Cutoff in the X-Ray Spectra of Black Holes via Reflection Spectroscopy.ApJ2015, 808, L37, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1505.03616]

    García, J.A.; Dauser, T.; Steiner, J.F.; McClintock, J.E.; Keck, M.L.; Wilms, J. On Estimating the High-energy Cutoff in the X-Ray Spectra of Black Holes via Reflection Spectroscopy.ApJ2015, 808, L37, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1505.03616]. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/808/2/L37

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  36. [36]

    Kammoun, E.; Lohfink, A.M.; Masterson, M.; Wilkins, D.R.; Zhao, X.; Balokovic, M.; Boorman, P .G.; Connors, R.; Coppi, P .; Fabian, A.; et al. The high energy X-ray probe (HEX-P): probing the physics of the X-ray corona in active galactic nuclei.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences2024, 10, 1308056, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2311.04679]. https://doi.org/10....

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Inferring black hole spins and probing accretion/ejection flows in AGNs with the Athena X-ray Integral Field Unit.A&A2019,628, A5, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1906.02734]

    Barret, D.; Cappi, M. Inferring black hole spins and probing accretion/ejection flows in AGNs with the Athena X-ray Integral Field Unit.A&A2019,628, A5, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1906.02734]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935817

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  38. [38]

    The X-ray disc/wind degeneracy in AGN.MNRAS2022,513, 551–572, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/2203.14789]

    Parker, M.L.; Matzeu, G.A.; Matthews, J.H.; Middleton, M.J.; Dauser, T.; Jiang, J.; Joyce, A.M. The X-ray disc/wind degeneracy in AGN.MNRAS2022,513, 551–572, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/2203.14789]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac877

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    X- Ray Reflection Spectroscopy of the Black Hole GX 339–4: Exploring the Hard State with Unprecedented Sensitivity.ApJ2015,813, 84, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1505.03607]

    García, J.A.; Steiner, J.F.; McClintock, J.E.; Remillard, R.A.; Grinberg, V .; Dauser, T. X- Ray Reflection Spectroscopy of the Black Hole GX 339–4: Exploring the Hard State with Unprecedented Sensitivity.ApJ2015,813, 84, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1505.03607]. https: //doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/84

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    The high-Eddington NLS1 Ark 564 has the coolest corona.MNRAS2017,468, 3489–3498, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1703.09815]

    Kara, E.; García, J.A.; Lohfink, A.; Fabian, A.C.; Reynolds, C.S.; Tombesi, F.; Wilkins, D.R. The high-Eddington NLS1 Ark 564 has the coolest corona.MNRAS2017,468, 3489–3498, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1703.09815]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx792

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    A Long, Hard Look at the Low/Hard State in Accreting Black Holes.ApJ2006, 653, 525–535, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0602633]

    Miller, J.M.; Homan, J.; Steeghs, D.; Rupen, M.; Hunstead, R.W.; Wijnands, R.; Charles, P .A.; Fabian, A.C. A Long, Hard Look at the Low/Hard State in Accreting Black Holes.ApJ2006, 653, 525–535, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0602633]. https://doi.org/10.1086/508644

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    A re-analysis of the iron line in the XMM-Newton data from the low/hard state in GX339-4.MNRAS2010,407, 2287–2296, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/0911.3243]

    Done, C.; Diaz Trigo, M. A re-analysis of the iron line in the XMM-Newton data from the low/hard state in GX339-4.MNRAS2010,407, 2287–2296, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/0911.3243]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17092.x

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  43. [43]

    Spectral analysis of the XMM-Newton data of GX 339-4 in the low/hard state: disc truncation and reflection.MNRAS2016,458, 2199–2214, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1512.01833]

    Basak, R.; Zdziarski, A.A. Spectral analysis of the XMM-Newton data of GX 339-4 in the low/hard state: disc truncation and reflection.MNRAS2016,458, 2199–2214, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1512.01833]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw420

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Comparison of spectral models for disc truncation in the hard state of GX 339-4.MNRAS2019, 485, 3845–3856, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1811.09145]

    Dziełak, M.A.; Zdziarski, A.A.; Szanecki, M.; De Marco, B.; Nied´ zwiecki, A.; Markowitz, A. Comparison of spectral models for disc truncation in the hard state of GX 339-4.MNRAS2019, 485, 3845–3856, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1811.09145]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz668

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    The Complex Accretion Geometry of GX 339-4 as Seen by NuSTAR and Swift.ApJ2015,808, 122, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1506.01381]

    Fürst, F.; Nowak, M.A.; Tomsick, J.A.; Miller, J.M.; Corbel, S.; Bachetti, M.; Boggs, S.E.; Chris- tensen, F.E.; Craig, W.W.; Fabian, A.C.; et al. The Complex Accretion Geometry of GX 339-4 as Seen by NuSTAR and Swift.ApJ2015,808, 122, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1506.01381]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/122

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    The Evolution of GX 339-4 in the Low-hard State as Seen by NuSTAR and Swift.ApJ2018,855, 61, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1712.02571]

    Wang-Ji, J.; García, J.A.; Steiner, J.F.; Tomsick, J.A.; Harrison, F.A.; Bambi, C.; Petrucci, P .O.; Ferreira, J.; Chakravorty, S.; Clavel, M. The Evolution of GX 339-4 in the Low-hard State as Seen by NuSTAR and Swift.ApJ2018,855, 61, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1712.02571]. https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaa974

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    Sridhar, N.; García, J.A.; Steiner, J.F.; Connors, R.M.T.; Grinberg, V .; Harrison, F.A. Evolution of the Accretion Disk-Corona during the Bright Hard-to-soft State Transition: A Reflection Spectroscopic Study with GX 339-4.ApJ2020,890, 53, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1912.11447]. https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab64f5. https://doi.org/10.3390/1010000 Version J...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1912

  48. [48]

    Accretion geometry of the black hole binary MAXI J1820+070 probed by frequency-resolved spectroscopy.MNRAS2021,507, 2744–2754, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/2103.08795]

    Axelsson, M.; Veledina, A. Accretion geometry of the black hole binary MAXI J1820+070 probed by frequency-resolved spectroscopy.MNRAS2021,507, 2744–2754, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/2103.08795]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2191

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    X-ray reflection in accreting stellar-mass black hole systems.MNRAS 2007,381, 1697–1701, [arXiv:astro-ph/0709.0270]

    Ross, R.R.; Fabian, A.C. X-ray reflection in accreting stellar-mass black hole systems.MNRAS 2007,381, 1697–1701, [arXiv:astro-ph/0709.0270]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.1 2339.x

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  50. [50]

    Modelling the broad-band spectra of MCG-6-30-15 with a relativistic reflection model.MNRAS2011,414, 2345–2353, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1104.4483]

    Chiang, C.Y.; Fabian, A.C. Modelling the broad-band spectra of MCG-6-30-15 with a relativistic reflection model.MNRAS2011,414, 2345–2353, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1104.4483]. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18553.x

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  51. [51]

    The Broadband Spectral Variability of MCG-6-30-15 Observed by NuSTAR and XMM-Newton.ApJ2014,787, 83, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1404.3561]

    Marinucci, A.; Matt, G.; Miniutti, G.; Guainazzi, M.; Parker, M.L.; Brenneman, L.; Fabian, A.C.; Kara, E.; Arevalo, P .; Ballantyne, D.R.; et al. The Broadband Spectral Variability of MCG-6-30-15 Observed by NuSTAR and XMM-Newton.ApJ2014,787, 83, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1404.3561]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/83

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Piotrowska, J.M.; García, J.A.; Walton, D.J.; Beckmann, R.S.; Stern, D.; Ballantyne, D.R.; Wilkins, D.R.; Bianchi, S.; Boorman, P .G.; Buchner, J.; et al. The high energy X-ray probe (HEX-P): constraining supermassive black hole growth with population spin measurements.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences2024,11, 1324796, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2311.0475...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Fe K α Profiles from Simulations of Accreting Black Holes.ApJ2016,826, 52, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1604.01126]

    Kinch, B.E.; Schnittman, J.D.; Kallman, T.R.; Krolik, J.H. Fe K α Profiles from Simulations of Accreting Black Holes.ApJ2016,826, 52, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1604.01126]. https://doi.org/10.3 847/0004-637X/826/1/52

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Simulation-based Prediction of Black Hole Fe Kα Line Profiles.ApJ2026,1005, 119, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2605.20317]

    Nagele, C.; Krolik, J.H.; Kinch, B.E.; Schnittman, J.D. Simulation-based Prediction of Black Hole Fe Kα Line Profiles.ApJ2026,1005, 119, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2605.20317]. https://doi.org/10.3 847/1538-4357/ae6eff

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Measuring black hole spins with x-ray reflection spectroscopy: A GRMHD outlook.Phys

    Shashank, S.; Abdikamalov, A.B.; Liu, H.; Nosirov, A.; Bambi, C.; Dihingia, I.K.; Mizuno, Y. Measuring black hole spins with x-ray reflection spectroscopy: A GRMHD outlook.Phys. Rev. D 2025,112, 123030, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2507.02583]. https://doi.org/10.1103/4sth-rnwv

    arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    An absorption origin for the X-ray spectral variability of MCG-6-30-15.A&A2008,483, 437–452, [arXiv:astro-ph/0803.2680]

    Miller, L.; Turner, T.J.; Reeves, J.N. An absorption origin for the X-ray spectral variability of MCG-6-30-15.A&A2008,483, 437–452, [arXiv:astro-ph/0803.2680]. https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361:200809590

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    The absorption-dominated model for the X-ray spectra of typeI active galaxies: MCG-6-30-15.MNRAS2009,399, L69–L73, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/0907.3114]

    Miller, L.; Turner, T.J.; Reeves, J.N. The absorption-dominated model for the X-ray spectra of typeI active galaxies: MCG-6-30-15.MNRAS2009,399, L69–L73, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/0907.3114]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00726.x

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  58. [58]

    Constraints on the absorption-dominated model for the X-ray spectrum of MCG-6-30-15.MNRAS2009, 397, L21–L25, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/0904.3099]

    Reynolds, C.S.; Fabian, A.C.; Brenneman, L.W.; Miniutti, G.; Uttley, P .; Gallo, L.C. Constraints on the absorption-dominated model for the X-ray spectrum of MCG-6-30-15.MNRAS2009, 397, L21–L25, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/0904.3099]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00676 .x

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  59. [59]

    Broad line emission from iron K- and L-shell transitions in the active galaxy 1H0707-495.Nature2009,459, 540–542

    Fabian, A.C.; Zoghbi, A.; Ross, R.R.; Uttley, P .; Gallo, L.C.; Brandt, W.N.; Blustin, A.J.; Boller, T.; Caballero-Garcia, M.D.; Larsson, J.; et al. Broad line emission from iron K- and L-shell transitions in the active galaxy 1H0707-495.Nature2009,459, 540–542. https://doi.org/10.103 8/nature08007

  60. [60]

    A disc wind in- terpretation of the strong Fe K α features in 1H 0707-495.MNRAS2016,461, 3954–3963, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1509.05645]

    Hagino, K.; Odaka, H.; Done, C.; Tomaru, R.; Watanabe, S.; Takahashi, T. A disc wind in- terpretation of the strong Fe K α features in 1H 0707-495.MNRAS2016,461, 3954–3963, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1509.05645]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1579

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    On Relativistic Disk Spectroscopy in Compact Objects with X-ray CCD Cameras.ApJ2010,724, 1441–1455, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1009.4391]

    Miller, J.M.; D’Aì, A.; Bautz, M.W.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Burrows, D.N.; Cackett, E.M.; Fabian, A.C.; Freyberg, M.J.; Haberl, F.; Kennea, J.; et al. On Relativistic Disk Spectroscopy in Compact Objects with X-ray CCD Cameras.ApJ2010,724, 1441–1455, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1009.4391]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/724/2/1441

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    High Density Reflection Spectroscopy - II

    Jiang, J.; Fabian, A.C.; Dauser, T.; Gallo, L.; García, J.A.; Kara, E.; Parker, M.L.; Tomsick, J.A.; Walton, D.J.; Reynolds, C.S. High Density Reflection Spectroscopy - II. The density of the inner black hole accretion disc in AGN.MNRAS2019,489, 3436–3455, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1908.07272]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2326

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1908

  63. [63]

    High-density reflection spectroscopy: I

    Jiang, J.; Fabian, A.C.; Wang, J.; Walton, D.J.; García, J.A.; Parker, M.L.; Steiner, J.F.; Tomsick, J.A. High-density reflection spectroscopy: I. A case study of GX 339-4.MNRAS2019,484, 1972–1982, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1901.01739]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz095. https://doi.org/10.3390/1010000 Version July 17, 2026 submitted toJournal Not Specified 20 of 20

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1972

  64. [64]

    The high energy X-ray probe (HEX-P): science overview

    García, J.A.; Stern, D.; Madsen, K.; Smith, M.; Grefenstette, B.; Ajello, M.; Alford, J.; Annuar, A.; Bachetti, M.; Balokovi´ c, M.; et al. The high energy X-ray probe (HEX-P): science overview. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences2024,11, 1471585. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2024 .1471585

    work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2024 2024

  65. [65]

    The High Energy X-ray Probe (HEX-P): probing accretion onto stellar mass black holes.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences2024, 10, 1292682, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2311.04782]

    Connors, R.M.T.; Tomsick, J.A.; Draghis, P .; Coughenour, B.; Shaw, A.W.; García, J.A.; Walton, D.; Madsen, K.; Stern, D.; Rodriguez, N.C.; et al. The High Energy X-ray Probe (HEX-P): probing accretion onto stellar mass black holes.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences2024, 10, 1292682, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2311.04782]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.202...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    The high energy X-ray probe (HEX-P): a new window into neutron star accretion.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences2023,10, 1292500, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2311.04687]

    Ludlam, R.M.; Malacaria, C.; Sokolova-Lapa, E.; Fuerst, F.; Pradhan, P .; Shaw, A.W.; Pottschmidt, K.; Pike, S.; Vasilopoulos, G.; Wilms, J.; et al. The high energy X-ray probe (HEX-P): a new window into neutron star accretion.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences2023,10, 1292500, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2311.04687]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2023.1292...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023