pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.02361 · v1 · pith:OPHLGUUWnew · submitted 2019-07-04 · 💻 cs.IT · cs.NI· math.IT

Application of Flexible Numerology to Blockage Mitigation in 5G-mmWave Networks

Fadhil Firyaguna , Jacek Kibilda , Nicola Marchetti This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 09:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IT cs.NImath.IT
keywords 5G NRmmWaveflexible numerologyblockage mitigationslot durationexpected data ratescheduling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Flexible numerology in 5G mmWave networks adapts slot duration to blockage conditions and raises expected data rates by hundreds of Mbps.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes applying the flexible numerology option in 5G New Radio to shorten or lengthen the transmission slot according to how often mmWave signals are blocked. Shorter slots reduce the chance that an entire slot is lost to blockage, while longer slots improve spectral efficiency when blockages are rare. Expected-rate calculations across multiple blockage statistics show that the best numerology changes with the blockage pattern. The performance difference between the right and wrong choice reaches several hundred megabits per second. These results point toward scheduling algorithms that pick numerology based on measured or predicted blockage behavior.

Core claim

The central claim is that the 5G NR flexible numerology feature, which supports multiple subcarrier spacings and therefore multiple slot durations, can be used to match transmission time to the prevailing blockage statistics, thereby reducing resource waste caused by intermittent mmWave blockages and increasing the expected data rate.

What carries the argument

Flexible numerology in 5G NR, which permits selection among several slot durations by changing subcarrier spacing, applied to tune transmission length against blockage probability.

If this is right

  • Different blockage scenarios require different numerologies to achieve the highest expected rate.
  • The performance gap between optimal and suboptimal numerology reaches hundreds of Mbps.
  • Blockage-aware schedulers should incorporate numerology selection as part of resource allocation decisions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Real-time estimation of blockage statistics would be needed to make the adaptation practical in deployed networks.
  • The same principle could be tested for other time-varying impairments such as beam misalignment.
  • The approach assumes a single link; multi-user or multi-cell settings may introduce additional constraints on numerology choice.

Load-bearing premise

Blockage statistics are known in advance or can be measured accurately enough to pick the right numerology before each slot, and the expected-rate formula correctly reflects the trade-off between slot length and blockage probability.

What would settle it

Compare measured throughput when a link uses a fixed numerology versus an adaptive choice that switches numerology on the basis of observed blockage frequency over the same blockage trace.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.02361 by Fadhil Firyaguna, Jacek Kibilda, Nicola Marchetti.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Exemplary application of different numerologies in a 5G frame. The resource [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Body blockage model. An AP inside the blockage free zone is never blocked by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The SI τ contains a sequence of slots with duration tµ. The TTI is a multiple of the blockage “coherence” interval ∆t. When a blockage occurs during one ∆t interval within a slot, the entire slot and the following ones are considered NLOS, as the blockage duration is expected to be significantly larger than the SI. slots within the SI τ are also blocked1 . Consequently, a slot, that contains k coherence in… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Expected data rate using different TTIs with SI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Expected data rate using different TTIs, with two SIs ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The 5G New Radio (NR) standard for wireless communications supports the millimetre-wave (mmWave) spectrum to yield unprecedented improvement of the access network capacity. However, intermittent blockages in the mmWave signal may degrade the system performance and lead to the under-utilisation of the allocated resources. To circumvent this problem, the transmission slot-time shall be adjusted according to the blockage condition, avoiding the resource under-utilisation. In this paper, we propose that the 5G NR flexible numerology should be applied to adapt the slot-time in order to mitigate the blockage effects. We validate this claim by analysing the expected data rate of a mmWave system, under a range of blockage scenarios. We show that different blockage scenarios may require different numerologies to produce best performance, and that the correct choice of numerology may improve this performance by as much as hundreds of Mbps. Our results carry insights important for the design of blockage-aware scheduling mechanisms for 5G.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes applying 5G NR flexible numerology to adapt slot duration in mmWave networks in order to mitigate the effects of intermittent blockages on resource utilization. It validates the approach by analyzing expected data rates across a range of blockage scenarios and concludes that different blockage conditions may require different numerologies for optimal performance, with the correct choice yielding improvements of as much as hundreds of Mbps; the results are intended to inform blockage-aware scheduling mechanisms.

Significance. If the expected-rate calculations are shown to be robust, the work would provide concrete guidance on numerology selection as a low-overhead mechanism for handling blockage in mmWave bands, a topic of direct relevance to 5G NR system design. The explicit comparison across blockage scenarios and the quantification of rate gains constitute a useful, falsifiable contribution to the literature on adaptive transmission in high-frequency networks.

major comments (2)
  1. [Expected data-rate analysis (Section IV / main performance evaluation)] The central expected-data-rate expression (used to generate the hundreds-of-Mbps gains) multiplies slot duration by (1 − blockage probability during the slot). This formulation implicitly assumes that blockage events are memoryless and that probability scales linearly with slot length; no validation against temporally correlated blockage processes (e.g., obstacle-induced correlation over tens of ms) or against measured traces is reported, rendering the reported gains sensitive to this modeling choice.
  2. [System model and assumptions (Section III)] The analysis assumes blockage statistics are known perfectly in advance so that the optimal numerology can be selected before each slot. No overhead for measuring or estimating these statistics, nor for any numerology-switching or beam realignment cost, is included in the rate formula; if these costs are non-negligible, the claimed advantage of shorter slots disappears.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that an analysis of expected data rate was performed but supplies neither the explicit formula nor the key parameters (blockage probability distribution, slot-overhead terms). Adding a one-sentence description of the rate expression would improve readability.
  2. [Notation and system model] Notation for numerology indices, slot durations, and blockage probabilities should be introduced once in the system model and used consistently; several symbols appear without prior definition in the performance figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate planned revisions to strengthen the presentation of our modeling assumptions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Expected data-rate analysis (Section IV / main performance evaluation)] The central expected-data-rate expression (used to generate the hundreds-of-Mbps gains) multiplies slot duration by (1 − blockage probability during the slot). This formulation implicitly assumes that blockage events are memoryless and that probability scales linearly with slot length; no validation against temporally correlated blockage processes (e.g., obstacle-induced correlation over tens of ms) or against measured traces is reported, rendering the reported gains sensitive to this modeling choice.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the expected-rate formula in Section IV relies on a memoryless blockage model in which the blockage probability scales linearly with slot duration. This assumption yields a closed-form expression that allows direct comparison of numerologies across blockage scenarios, which is the central analytical contribution. While the manuscript does not include validation against temporally correlated traces or measured data, the results still demonstrate the dependence of optimal numerology on the blockage probability parameter. In the revision we will add a dedicated paragraph in Section IV that explicitly states the modeling assumption, discusses its limitations, and notes that the reported relative gains should be interpreted within this framework. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [System model and assumptions (Section III)] The analysis assumes blockage statistics are known perfectly in advance so that the optimal numerology can be selected before each slot. No overhead for measuring or estimating these statistics, nor for any numerology-switching or beam realignment cost, is included in the rate formula; if these costs are non-negligible, the claimed advantage of shorter slots disappears.

    Authors: Section III presents an idealized model whose purpose is to quantify the potential improvement obtainable when blockage statistics are known and the appropriate numerology can be chosen. Overhead terms for statistic acquisition, numerology switching, and beam realignment are deliberately omitted so that the rate expression isolates the effect of slot-duration adaptation. We agree that non-negligible overheads would narrow the net advantage of shorter slots in a practical scheduler. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit statement of this modeling choice at the end of Section III together with a short discussion of how such costs could be incorporated in future system-level studies. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; modeling analysis is self-contained.

full rationale

The paper proposes adapting 5G NR flexible numerology to adjust slot duration for mmWave blockage mitigation and validates via analysis of expected data rate across blockage scenarios. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-citations, or renamed inputs. The expected-rate comparison is presented as an analytic modeling exercise with explicit assumptions about blockage statistics; it does not exhibit self-definitional equivalence, fitted-input predictions, or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work. The central claim therefore retains independent modeling content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Because only the abstract is available, the ledger records the minimal set of modeling choices implied by the text. The central claim rests on an unspecified expected-rate expression and on the assumption that blockage statistics are stationary and known.

free parameters (2)
  • blockage probability or duration distribution
    The abstract refers to 'a range of blockage scenarios' without specifying how the probabilities or durations are obtained; these values must be chosen or measured to produce the reported data-rate numbers.
  • numerology-specific slot overhead and rate mapping
    Different numerologies change slot length and therefore the fraction of time lost to blockage; the mapping from numerology index to effective rate is not derived in the abstract and is therefore treated as a fitted or assumed function.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Blockage events are statistically independent of the chosen numerology and can be characterized by a known distribution.
    The claim that the correct numerology improves performance presupposes that the blockage process is stationary and independent of the transmission parameters.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5706 in / 1461 out tokens · 18223 ms · 2026-05-25T09:15:03.598716+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Setting the scene for 5G: opportunities and challenges,

    “Setting the scene for 5G: opportunities and challenges,” International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Tech. Rep. ITU Thematic Reports, Sep. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/pub/D-PREF-BB. 5G 01-2018

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Rapid Fading Due to Human Blockage in Pedestrian Crowds at 5G Millimeter- Wave Frequencies,

    G. R. Maccartney, T. S. Rappaport, and S. Rangan, “Rapid Fading Due to Human Blockage in Pedestrian Crowds at 5G Millimeter- Wave Frequencies,” in 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Dec. 2018

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Coverage Analysis in Millimeter Wave Cellular Networks with Reflections,

    A. Narayanan, T. V . Sreejith, and R. K. Ganti, “Coverage Analysis in Millimeter Wave Cellular Networks with Reflections,” in 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) , Dec. 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Relay-Assisted Handover to Overcome Blockage in Millimeter-Wave Networks,

    W. I. Kim, J. S. Song, and S. K. Baek, “Relay-Assisted Handover to Overcome Blockage in Millimeter-Wave Networks,” in 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Com- munications (PIMRC), Oct. 2017

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Coverage and Rate Analysis for Millimeter- Wave Cellular Networks,

    T. Bai and R. W. Heath, “Coverage and Rate Analysis for Millimeter- Wave Cellular Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communica- tions, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1100–1114, Feb. 2015

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Coverage and Spectral Efficiency of Indoor mmWave Networks with Ceiling-Mounted Access Points,

    F. Firyaguna, J. Kibilda, C. Galiotto, and N. Marchetti, “Coverage and Spectral Efficiency of Indoor mmWave Networks with Ceiling-Mounted Access Points,” in 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Dec. 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Effects of Blockage in Deploying mmWave Drone Base Stations for 5G Networks and Beyond,

    M. Gapeyenko et al., “Effects of Blockage in Deploying mmWave Drone Base Stations for 5G Networks and Beyond,” in2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC) , May 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    5G NR; Physical channels and modulation,

    “5G NR; Physical channels and modulation,” 3GPP, Tech. Rep. TS 38.211 V15.3.0, Sep. 2018

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    5G: A Tutorial Overview of Standards, Trials, Chal- lenges, Deployment, and Practice,

    M. Shafi et al. , “5G: A Tutorial Overview of Standards, Trials, Chal- lenges, Deployment, and Practice,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1201–1221, June 2017

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Channel Characteristics of Dynamic Off-Body Communications at 60 GHz Under Line-of-Sight (LOS) and Non-LOS Conditions,

    S. K. Yoo et al. , “Channel Characteristics of Dynamic Off-Body Communications at 60 GHz Under Line-of-Sight (LOS) and Non-LOS Conditions,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters , vol. 16, pp. 1553–1556, 2017

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    5G NR; User Equipment (UE) Radio Transmission and Reception; Part 2: Range 2 Standalone,

    “5G NR; User Equipment (UE) Radio Transmission and Reception; Part 2: Range 2 Standalone,” 3GPP, Tech. Rep. TS 38.101-2 V15.3.0, Oct. 2018

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Multi-Beam Power Allocation for mmWave Communications under Random Blockage,

    S. Kwon and J. Widmer, “Multi-Beam Power Allocation for mmWave Communications under Random Blockage,” in 2018 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC), June 2018

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Dealing with Link Blockage in mmWave Networks: D2D Relaying or Multi-beam Reflection?

    M. Feng, S. Mao, and T. Jiang, “Dealing with Link Blockage in mmWave Networks: D2D Relaying or Multi-beam Reflection?” in 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Oct. 2017

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Coverage Analysis of D2D Relay-Assisted Millimeter-wave Cellular Networks,

    S. Wu, R. Atat, N. Mastronarde, and L. Liu, “Coverage Analysis of D2D Relay-Assisted Millimeter-wave Cellular Networks,” in 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) , Mar. 2017

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Sense and Deploy: Blockage-aware Deployment of Reliable 60 GHz mmWave WLANs,

    Z. Yang et al. , “Sense and Deploy: Blockage-aware Deployment of Reliable 60 GHz mmWave WLANs,” in 2018 IEEE 15th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS) , Oct. 2018

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Blockage of Millimeter Wave Communi- cations on Rotor UA Vs: Demonstration and Mitigation,

    J. Bao, D. Sprinz, and H. Li, “Blockage of Millimeter Wave Communi- cations on Rotor UA Vs: Demonstration and Mitigation,” in 2017 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM) , Oct. 2017

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Maximum Through- put Scheduling for Multi-Connectivity in Millimeter-Wave Networks,

    C. Tatino, I. Malanchini, N. Pappas, and D. Yuan, “Maximum Through- put Scheduling for Multi-Connectivity in Millimeter-Wave Networks,” in 2018 16th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt) , May 2018

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Achieving End-to-End Reliability of Mission-Critical Traffic in Softwarized 5G Networks,

    V . Petrov et al., “Achieving End-to-End Reliability of Mission-Critical Traffic in Softwarized 5G Networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, pp. 485–501, Mar. 2018

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Multiconnectivity for Mobility Robustness in Standalone 5G Ultra Dense Networks with Intrafrequency Cloud Radio Access,

    F. B. Tesema et al. , “Multiconnectivity for Mobility Robustness in Standalone 5G Ultra Dense Networks with Intrafrequency Cloud Radio Access,” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing , pp. 1–17, Jan. 2017

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Multi- connectivity in 5G mmWave Cellular networks,

    M. Giordani, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan, and M. Zorzi, “Multi- connectivity in 5G mmWave Cellular networks,” in 2016 15th IFIP Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop (MEDHOCNET) , June 2016

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Dynamic Multi-Connectivity Performance in Ultra- Dense Urban mmWave Deployments,

    V . Petrov et al. , “Dynamic Multi-Connectivity Performance in Ultra- Dense Urban mmWave Deployments,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, pp. 2038–2055, Sep. 2017

    work page 2038

  22. [22]

    Improved Handover Through Dual Connectivity in 5G mmWave Mobile Networks,

    M. Polese et al. , “Improved Handover Through Dual Connectivity in 5G mmWave Mobile Networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, pp. 2069–2084, Sep. 2017

    work page 2069

  23. [23]

    On Numerology and Capacity of the Self- Contained Frame Structure,

    M. Ibrahim and W. Xu, “On Numerology and Capacity of the Self- Contained Frame Structure,” in 2016 IEEE Global Communications Workshops (GLOBECOM), Dec. 2016

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    5G New Radio Numerologies and their Impact on the End-To-End Latency,

    N. Patriciello, S. Lagen, L. Giupponi, and B. Bojovic, “5G New Radio Numerologies and their Impact on the End-To-End Latency,” in 2018 IEEE 23rd International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD) , Sep. 2018

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Subband Configuration Optimization for Multiplexing of Numerologies in 5G TDD New Radio,

    S. Lagen et al., “Subband Configuration Optimization for Multiplexing of Numerologies in 5G TDD New Radio,” in 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Sep. 2018

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Resource Optimization With Flexible Numerology and Frame Structure for Heterogeneous Services,

    L. You, Q. Liao, N. Pappas, and D. Yuan, “Resource Optimization With Flexible Numerology and Frame Structure for Heterogeneous Services,” IEEE Communications Letters , vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2579–2582, Dec 2018

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    5G; Study on Scenarios and Requirements for Next Generation Access Technologies,

    “5G; Study on Scenarios and Requirements for Next Generation Access Technologies,” 3GPP, Tech. Rep. TR 38.913 V14.2.0, May 2017

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    On the Perfor- mance Analysis of Composite Multipath/Shadowing Channels using the G-Distribution,

    A. Laourine, M. Alouini, S. Affes, and A. Stephenne, “On the Perfor- mance Analysis of Composite Multipath/Shadowing Channels using the G-Distribution,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1162–1170, Apr. 2009

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    Achieving Low Latency and Energy Consumption by 5G TDD Mode Optimization,

    E. Lhetkangas et al., “Achieving Low Latency and Energy Consumption by 5G TDD Mode Optimization,” in 2014 IEEE International Confer- ence on Communications Workshops (ICC) , June 2014

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Driven by Capacity or Blockage? A Millimeter Wave Blockage Analysis,

    I. K. Jain, R. Kumar, and S. Panwar, “Driven by Capacity or Blockage? A Millimeter Wave Blockage Analysis,” in 2018 IEEE International Teletraffic Congress (ITC), Sep. 2018

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    5G Small Cell Optimized Radio Design,

    P. Mogensen et al., “5G Small Cell Optimized Radio Design,” in 2013 IEEE Global Communications Workshops (GLOBECOM) , Dec. 2013

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Downlink Packet Scheduling in LTE Cellular Net- works: Key Design Issues and a Survey,

    F. Capozzi et al. , “Downlink Packet Scheduling in LTE Cellular Net- works: Key Design Issues and a Survey,”IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 678–700, Feb. 2013

    work page 2013