Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Hydraulic resistance of channels obstructed by a dense array of elastic fibers

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A dense bed of flexible hairs gives a laminar channel a nonlinear pressure–flow response controlled by a single dimensionless drag force.

desk verdict A solid, useful paper on pressure-driven flow through dense elastic hair beds; the reduced model works well, but the 'no free parameters' claim is too strong and the SM has a fixable typo. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01875 v2 pith:OQWLSF26 submitted 2025-01-03 cond-mat.soft physics.flu-dyn

Etienne Jambon-Puillet This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.flu-dyn MSC 76S0574F1076D05
keywords elastichairshydraulicresistanceporousmediumfluid-structureinteractionlarge-deflectionbeamDarcyflowmicrofluidiccontrolconfinedlaminar
topics Navier-Stokes Regularity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens when a pressure-driven liquid is forced through a channel that is almost completely blocked by a dense bed of soft, elastic hairs. The answer it establishes is that the hairs bend under the flow, opening up the free space above them, so the pressure drop grows more slowly than linearly with the flow rate. The author models the hair bed as a deformable porous medium: Darcy flow inside the bed is matched to a parabolic channel flow above it, while a nonlinear elastic beam describes the bending of each hair, with the two coupled through the open gap height. Without any adjustable constants, the model reproduces measured hair deflections and pressure drops across a wide range of hair diameters, spacings, stiffnesses, channel heights, and flow rates. The key output is a single dimensionless drag force, $\hat{f}_0$, that controls when flexibility starts to matter and collapses all the experiments onto common curves.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the dimensionless drag force $\hat{f}_0$ defined in Eq. (4), which packages the elasto-viscous parameter $\hat{q} = \eta q/(E d^2)$ together with the aspect ratios $\hat{L} = L/H$, $\hat{d} = d/\delta$, $\hat{\delta} = \delta/H$, and the undeformed-bed resistance $\hat{R}_0$. It measures the fluid load felt by a rigid hair in units of the hair's bending stiffness. Linked to it is the closure relation $h = H - y(L)$: the free gap above the bed is set by the tip position of a nonlinear beam whose curvature responds to a distributed drag from the pore flow and a concentrated shear at the tip, while the flow field is a matched Darcy/Poiseuille profile whose resistance $R(h)$ is given by Eq. (2). Solving the beam and the flow together yields the hair shape and the pressure drop; expanding at small $\hat{q}$ shows why $\hat{f}_0$ alone organizes the response.

What would settle it

Perform the same pressure-drop and deflection measurements on a sparse hair bed (spacing comparable to the hair diameter) or a bed where the free gap $H-L$ is of order $\sqrt{k}$, so the two-region Darcy assumption is invalid; the model predicts the measured $\Delta P(Q)$ should deviate from Eq. (2) matched to the beam, and the $\hat{f}_0$ collapse should fail. A second, sharper test is to push a soft, tightly packed bed until adjacent hairs touch, explicitly neglected in the paper: the measured resistance should depart from the contactless prediction exactly where contact begins.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that hair flexibility converts a channel's linear hydraulic resistance into a strongly sub-linear one, and that this nonlinearity can be predicted a priori by a reduced-order fluid–structure interaction model with no fitted parameters. In experiments, rigid hair beds give a linear pressure–flow curve, while soft beds deflect increasingly with flow rate until the hairs nearly lie flat, and the measured $\Delta P(Q)$ curves bend downward accordingly. The model closes the loop by making the porous bed height $h = H - y(L)$ depend on the tip deflection of a large-deflection beam loaded by the flow, and then computing the resistance $R(h)$ from the two-region Darcy/Poiseuille solution. Asymptotic analysis of the model yields the governing parameter $\hat{f}_0$: the deflection grows as $\hat{f}_0/8$ in the streamwise direction and $\hat{f}_0^2/112$ in the vertical direction, and the hydraulic resistance, normalized by its rigid value, begins to drop when $\hat{f}_0 \sim 1$ and is observed empirically to fall roughly as $\hat{f}_0^{-2/3}$ at large values.

Load-bearing premise

The weakest step is replacing the deflected hair bundle with a flat, homogeneous porous layer whose height is just the channel height minus the tip deflection and whose permeability is the undeformed-array value $k = c\delta^2(1-d/\delta)^3$; if the curved interface, the deformation-dependent solid fraction, or hair–hair contact changes the effective permeability, the parameter-free agreement could be coincidental rather than causal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For rigid hairs the pressure–flow curve is linear; for soft hairs it is strongly sub-linear, so the same channel acts as a passive relief valve that opens only once $\hat{f}_0$ exceeds about one.
  • Because the model uses no fitted constants, hair deflection and pressure drop can be predicted from fluid viscosity, flow rate, hair geometry, and elastic modulus alone, making it a design tool for microfluidic elements.
  • Inclined hairs give direction-dependent resistance, with the backward-to-forward resistance ratio reaching a maximum near $\hat{f}_0 \sim 1$–$10$, so there is an optimal flow rate for rectification.
  • All experiments collapse onto a master curve in $\hat{f}_0$, meaning a single parameter, not the full set of lengths and moduli, controls the fluid–structure interaction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because $\hat{f}_0$ absorbs every geometric and material length in the problem, the same collapse should hold for other dense fibrous beds in pressure-driven confinement, such as intestinal brush borders or ciliated surfaces, as long as the two-region flow picture remains valid; this is an extrapolation the paper motivates but does not test.
  • The observed $\hat{f}_0^{-2/3}$ large-deformation scaling is empirical in the paper; deriving it analytically would give a closed-form relief-valve law and is a natural next step.
  • Including deformation-dependent permeability and hair–hair contact, which the paper explicitly sets aside, should remove the residual deviations seen in the tightest and softest beds, and would make the model applicable beyond first contact.
  • Since the reduced model solves almost instantly, it could be embedded in a network solver to design memristive or rectifying fluidic circuits; the paper sketches the devices but stops short of network-level implementation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies pressure-driven laminar flow in channels partially obstructed by dense arrays of elastic hairs. Experiments varying hair stiffness, channel height, spacing, and diameter show that hair deflection increases with flow rate, leading to a strongly sub-linear pressure-flow relationship. The author develops a reduced-order model in which the hair bed is treated as a deformable porous medium matched to a Poiseuille free flow via the Beavers-Joseph condition, coupled to a geometrically nonlinear beam equation for individual hairs. The model is solved numerically and compared with measured tip deflections and pressure drops, showing quantitative agreement over a wide parameter range. An asymptotic analysis identifies a single dimensionless drag force f0 that collapses deflection and hydraulic resistance data, and the model is used to predict flow rectification with inclined hairs.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a simple, computationally cheap, a-priori predictive framework for a class of fluid-structure interactions relevant to biological surfaces and microfluidic passive flow control. The experimental database is extensive (variation of Young modulus, channel height, spacing, and diameter), and the model is tested against both deflection and pressure drop independently. The dimensionless collapse in Fig. 3d,e is a valuable practical result for design. The paper is also honest in listing neglected mechanisms and their expected ranges of importance. However, the no-free-parameters claim and the supplementary asymptotic derivation contain issues that need correction before the predictive claim is fully credible.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text, no-free-parameters claims and Fig. 2b] The paper repeatedly states that the model predicts the experiments without any free parameters (Abstract, Introduction, and Conclusion). Yet the Beavers-Joseph slip coefficient is set to alpha=1 explicitly by comparing the rigid-bed baseline with the measured pressure drop in Fig. 2b, where the text says the baseline captures the pressure drop reasonably well and then states therefore alpha=1 in the following. Also, the permeability prefactor c=0.1475 comes from a previously fitted correlation (Ref. [29]). While these coefficients are not fitted to the soft-hair deflection data, alpha is effectively calibrated on a subset of the experimental data, so the unqualified no-free-parameters statement is not accurate. The manuscript should rephrase the claim, specify the provenance of alpha and c, and state that the model is parameter-free only in the sense that all coefficients are taken from the literature or from the rigid-bed baseline measured in the same setup.
  2. [Supplemental Material, Eq. (S7) and asymptotic analysis] The asymptotic solution printed in Eq. (S7), theta1(s) = (f0/(6q))(s^3 - 3s^2 + s), does not satisfy the free-end boundary condition theta'(1)=0; one obtains theta1'(1) = -f0/(3q) != 0. The correct solution that satisfies both theta(0)=0 and theta'(1)=0 is theta1(s) = (f0/(6q))(3s^2 - s^3 - 3s). Interestingly, the final reported results dx/L = f0/8 and dy/L = f0^2/112 follow from the corrected solution, so the printed formula appears to be a typographical error rather than a fundamental flaw. Nevertheless, the derivation as written is internally inconsistent, and since the asymptotic analysis is used to justify the f0 collapse and the criterion f0~1, the SM must be corrected and the sign convention clarified.
  3. [Supplemental Material, Model limitations] The neglect of deflection-dependent permeability and hair-to-hair contact is acknowledged, but the manuscript does not quantify the range of validity of the flat, constant-permeability porous-layer mapping. The SM itself states that contact was observed at high flow rates for the densest beds and that the experiments with d=0.8 mm and delta=1 mm (Fig. 2h) show deviations from the model. Given that the central claim is a-priori predictability, the manuscript should either provide an order-of-magnitude estimate of when these neglected effects become non-negligible (e.g., in terms of f0 and d/delta) or explicitly state the parameter window over which the model is expected to be accurate. Without this, the quantitative agreement in the tested range could be partly coincidental.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Main text, Eq. (3)] The sign convention in Eq. (3) appears inconsistent with the observed downstream deflection: with a plus sign in front of the positive force terms, the small-deflection solution would give a negative tip angle for a positive load, while the experiments in Fig. 1d and the reported positive dx/L imply the opposite. A sentence stating the sign convention (e.g., theta positive in the flow direction, and the equation written accordingly) would remove this ambiguity.
  2. [Supplemental Material, after Eq. (S2)] The dimensionless permeability is written as k = c delta^2 (1-d)^3/4, which appears to contain a typographical stray /4; the correct expression is k = c delta^2 (1 - d/delta)^3, as used in the main text.
  3. [Figure 3e and discussion of -2/3 scaling] The empirical observation R/R0 ~ f0^{-2/3} for large f0 is presented without an error estimate or a fit. Adding a brief quantitative statement of the exponent and its uncertainty, or at least noting the range of f0 over which it holds, would strengthen the claim.
  4. [Notation] The symbol dy is used both for the vertical coordinate y and for the vertical tip deflection (e.g., dy/L in Fig. 2 and Eq. (S8)). Using a distinct symbol such as Delta y or delta_y would avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the model's predictions are tested against independent deflection and pressure measurements, and the imported permeability constant and fixed slip coefficient are not fitted to the nonlinear response.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and the central claims are validated against independent data. The porous-medium permeability k = c δ^2(1−d/δ)^3 with c = 0.1475 is taken from an external literature result (Sobera & Kleijn), not fitted to the present experiments. The Beavers–Joseph slip coefficient α is set to 1 after checking that the rigid-bed pressure drop is captured, but the nonlinear deflection and pressure-flow curves are then computed with no adjustable parameters and compared directly to measurements of both dy/L and ΔP. The dimensionless drag f0 is derived from the model's own equations (Eq. 4) and used to organize the data; the observed f0 collapse and the empirical −2/3 tail are presented as observations, not as derivations from a fitted input. The SM's acknowledged limitations—neglected hair-to-hair contact and deflection-dependent permeability—are genuine modeling assumptions that could affect quantitative accuracy, but they do not make the derivation circular. The SM asymptotic boundary-condition inconsistency in Eq. S7 is a typo/derivation defect unrelated to the load-bearing numerical model and does not constitute circularity. The one self-citation (Ushay, Jambon-Puillet & Brun) concerns bubble entrapment in the experimental procedure and is not load-bearing. Overall, no step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model is assembled from a small number of known pieces: a literature permeability law, an empirical slip coefficient, and a nonlinear beam equation. No new physical entities are introduced. The main simplification, representing the curved hair bundle as a flat constant-permeability porous layer, is the largest unverified input and is acknowledged only partially in the SM.

free parameters (2)
  • Beavers-Joseph slip coefficient α = 1 (fixed by hand)
    Empirical coefficient of order 1 in the slip boundary condition, Eq. (1). Set to 1 after comparing the rigid hair bed baseline, rather than derived or measured in this paper.
  • Permeability prefactor c in k = c δ^2 (1 - d/δ)^3 = 0.1475 (from Sobera and Kleijn 2006)
    Coefficient from a published scaling law for cylinder arrays. The paper uses it without remeasurement, and the model predictions depend on its value.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The hair bed is a homogeneous, isotropic Darcy porous medium with a permeability that remains constant during deformation.
    Used to write the flow in the bed and to compute R(h) in Eq. (2). The SM explicitly states that solid fraction changes with deflection and that this is neglected.
  • ad hoc to paper The top of the porous layer is flat and located at the hair tip height, h = H - y(L).
    Couples the beam solution to the flow model; no averaging over the actual curved hair profiles is done.
  • domain assumption The Beavers-Joseph slip boundary condition with slip length sqrt(k)/α and α = 1 holds at the porous-free interface.
    Used in Eq. (1) for the free-channel velocity profile and in Eq. (2) for the resistance.
  • domain assumption The rigid-bed permeability follows k = c δ^2 (1 - d/δ)^3 with c = 0.1475.
    Taken from Sobera and Kleijn (2006); not validated in situ for these molded arrays.
  • ad hoc to paper The tip shear force is estimated from a no-slip parabolic velocity profile whose average equals the macroscale free-flow average.
    Used for F in Eq. (3) via SM Eq. (S1); this is an uncontrolled approximation, though F is small compared to the distributed load.
  • standard math The hairs obey inextensible nonlinear Euler-Bernoulli beam theory with a clamped base and a moment-free tip.
    Governing beam equation, Eq. (3), with boundary conditions θ(0) = 0 and θ'(L) = 0.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hydraulic resistance of channels obstructed by a dense array of elastic fibers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OQWLSF26

@misc{pith2026250101875,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hydraulic resistance of channels obstructed by a dense array of elastic fibers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OQWLSF26}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01875}
}
abstract

Dense arrays of soft hair-like structures protruding from surfaces are ubiquitous in living systems. Fluid flows can easily deform these soft hairs, which in turn impact the flow properties. At the microscale, flows are often confined which exacerbates this feedback loop: the hair deformation strongly affects the flow geometry. Here, I investigate experimentally and theoretically pressure driven flows in laminar channels obstructed by a dense array of elastic fibers or `hairs'. I show that the system displays a non-linear hydraulic resistance that I model by treating the hair bed as a deformable porous medium whose height results from the deflection of individual fibers. This fluid-structure interaction model encompassing flow in porous media, confinement, and elasticity is then leveraged to identify the key dimensionless parameter governing the problem: $\hat{f}_0$ a dimensionless drag that combines fluid, solid, and geometrical properties. Finally, I demonstrate how these results can be harnessed to design passive flow control elements for microfluidic networks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.01875 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Normalized vertical tip deflection dy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the rectification of oscillatory flows by flexible leaflets in a confined geometry

    physics.flu-dyn 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Collective flexible leaflets rectify low-Re oscillatory squeeze flow, maximizing net transport at high density and an optimal elastoviscous number η.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [29]

    M. P. Sobera and C. R. Kleijn, Hydraulic permeability of or- dered and disordered single-layer arrays of cylinders, Phys. Rev. E 74, 036301 (2006)

    work page 2006

  2. [1]

    de Langre, Effects of wind on plants, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 40, 141 (2008)

    E. de Langre, Effects of wind on plants, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 40, 141 (2008)

    work page 2008

  3. [2]

    H. M. Nepf, Flow and transport in regions with aquatic vegeta- tion, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 44, 123 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [3]

    C. J. Harper, S. M. Swartz, and E. L. Brainerd, Specialized bat tongue is a hemodynamic nectar mop, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences 110, 8852 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [4]

    Lechantre, A

    A. Lechantre, A. Draux, H.-A. B. Hua, D. Michez, P. Damman, and F. Brau, Essential role of papillae flexibility in nectar cap- ture by bees, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2025513118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [5]

    Weinbaum, Y

    S. Weinbaum, Y . Duan, L. M. Satlin, T. Wang, and A. M. Wein- stein, Mechanotransduction in the renal tubule, American Jour- nal of Physiology-Renal Physiology 299, F1220 (2010), pMID: 20810611

    work page 2010

  7. [6]

    Loiseau, S

    E. Loiseau, S. Gsell, A. Nommick, C. Jomard, D. Gras, P. Chanez, U. D’Ortona, L. Kodjabachian, J. Favier, and A. Viallat, Active mucus–cilia hydrodynamic coupling drives self-organization of human bronchial epithelium, Nature Physics 16, 1158 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [7]

    Weinbaum, L

    S. Weinbaum, L. M. Cancel, B. M. Fu, and J. M. Tarbell, The glycocalyx and its role in vascular physiology and vascular re- lated diseases, Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology12, 37 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 37 references
  1. [8]

    Satir, L

    P. Satir, L. B. Pedersen, and S. T. Christensen, The primary cil- ium at a glance, Journal of Cell Science 123, 499 (2010)

    2010

  2. [9]

    HU and L

    R. HU and L. PS, Particle capture mechanisms in suspension- feeding invertebrates, Marine Ecology Progress Series418, 255 (2010)

    2010

  3. [10]

    Gilpin, M

    W. Gilpin, M. S. Bull, and M. Prakash, The multiscale physics of cilia and flagella, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 74 (2020)

    2020

  4. [11]

    Guglielmini, A

    L. Guglielmini, A. Kushwaha, E. S. G. Shaqfeh, and H. A. Stone, Buckling transitions of an elastic filament in a viscous stagnation point flow, Physics of Fluids 24, 123601 (2012)

    2012

  5. [12]

    Young, M

    Y .-N. Young, M. Downs, and C. R. Jacobs, Dynamics of the pri- mary cilium in shear flow, Biophysical Journal103, 629 (2012)

    2012

  6. [13]

    D. C. Leslie, C. J. Easley, E. Seker, J. M. Karlinsey, M. Utz, M. R. Begley, and J. P. Landers, Frequency-specific flow con- trol in microfluidic circuits with passive elastomeric features, Nature Physics 5, 231 (2009)

    2009

  7. [14]

    Gomez, D

    M. Gomez, D. E. Moulton, and D. Vella, Passive control of vis- cous flow via elastic snap-through, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 144502 (2017)

    2017

  8. [15]

    J.-F. m. c. Louf, J. Knoblauch, and K. H. Jensen, Bending and stretching of soft pores enable passive control of fluid flows, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 098101 (2020)

    2020

  9. [16]

    Brandenbourger, A

    M. Brandenbourger, A. Dangremont, R. Sprik, and C. Coulais, Tunable flow asymmetry and flow rectification with bio- inspired soft leaflets, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 084102 (2020)

    2020

  10. [17]

    L. C. van Laake, J. de Vries, S. Malek Kani, and J. T. Overvelde, A fluidic relaxation oscillator for reprogrammable sequential actuation in soft robots, Matter 5, 2898 (2022)

    2022

  11. [18]

    C. P. Moore, J. Husson, A. Boudaoud, G. Amselem, and C. N. Baroud, Clogging of a rectangular slit by a spherical soft parti- cle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 064001 (2023)

    2023

  12. [19]

    H. Garg, P. G. Ledda, J. S. Pedersen, and M. Pezzulla, Passive viscous flow selection via fluid-induced buckling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 084001 (2024)

    2024

  13. [20]

    Alvarado, J

    J. Alvarado, J. Comtet, E. de Langre, and A. E. Hosoi, Non- linear flow response of soft hair beds, Nature Physics 13, 1014 (2017)

    2017

  14. [21]

    D. B. Stein and M. J. Shelley, Coarse graining the dynamics of immersed and driven fiber assemblies, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 073302 (2019)

    2019

  15. [22]

    de Blois, S

    C. de Blois, S. J. Haward, and A. Q. Shen, Canopy elastic tur- bulence: Spontaneous formation of waves in beds of slender microposts, Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 023301 (2023)

    2023

  16. [23]

    Ushay, E

    C. Ushay, E. Jambon-Puillet, and P.-T. Brun, Interfacial flows past arrays of elastic fibers, Phys. Rev. Fluids8, 044001 (2023)

    2023

  17. [24]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by pub- lisher] for experimental methods, material characterization, de- tails on the model derivation and its limits, a table summarizing the parameters of each experiment, and a supplementary movie of the experiment

  18. [25]

    Le Bars and M

    M. Le Bars and M. G. Worster, Interfacial conditions between a pure fluid and a porous medium: implications for binary alloy solidification, Journal of Fluid Mechanics550, 149–173 (2006)

    2006

  19. [26]

    G. S. Beavers and D. D. Joseph, Boundary conditions at a natu- rally permeable wall, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 30, 197–207 (1967)

    1967

  20. [27]

    Happel, Viscous flow relative to arrays of cylinders, AIChE Journal 5, 174 (1959)

    J. Happel, Viscous flow relative to arrays of cylinders, AIChE Journal 5, 174 (1959)

    1959

  21. [28]

    Drummond and M

    J. Drummond and M. Tahir, Laminar viscous flow through reg- ular arrays of parallel solid cylinders, International Journal of Multiphase Flow 10, 515 (1984)

    1984

  22. [30]

    G. A. Zampogna and A. Bottaro, Fluid flow over and through a regular bundle of rigid fibres, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 792, 5–35 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Mart ´ınez-Calvo, M

    A. Mart ´ınez-Calvo, M. D. Biviano, A. H. Christensen, E. Kat- ifori, K. H. Jensen, and M. Ruiz-Garc´ıa, The fluidic memristor as a collective phenomenon in elastohydrodynamic networks, Nature Communications 15, 3121 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    F. Box, G. G. Peng, D. Pihler-Puzovi ´c, and A. Juel, Flow- induced choking of a compliant hele-shaw cell, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 30228 (2020). S1 Supplemental Material for: Dense array of elastic hairs obstructing a fluidic channel Etienne Jambon...

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Ushay, E

    C. Ushay, E. Jambon-Puillet, and P.-T. Brun, Interfacial flows past arrays of elastic fibers, Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 044001 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    H. J. Qi, K. Joyce, and M. C. Boyce, Durometer hardness and the stress-strain behavior of elastomeric materials, Rubber Chem- istry and Technology 76, 419 (2003)

    2003

  27. [35]

    Alvarado, J

    J. Alvarado, J. Comtet, E. de Langre, and A. E. Hosoi, Nonlinear flow response of soft hair beds, Nature Physics 13, 1014 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    G. S. Beavers and D. D. Joseph, Boundary conditions at a nat- urally permeable wall, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 30, 197–207 (1967)

    1967

  29. [37]

    M. P. Sobera and C. R. Kleijn, Hydraulic permeability of ordered and disordered single-layer arrays of cylinders, Phys. Rev. E 74, 036301 (2006). S5 Experiment number Material H (mm) L (mm) d (mm) δ (mm) T (◦C) Qmax (mL/min) 8 PlasGray v2 5.76 4.96 0.57 1 24.4 15 10 VPS 32 5.4...

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.