Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 39 references

Quasinormal modes of scalar and Maxwell field perturbations coupled to the Einstein tensor in generalized Nariai spacetimes

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper derives exact quasinormal-mode frequencies for scalar and Maxwell fields coupled to the Einstein tensor in generalized Nariai spacetimes, showing the two spectra respond oppositely to the coupling and develop purely imaginary int

desk verdict Clean analytic extension of known QNM technology to Einstein-tensor-coupled scalar and axial Maxwell fields in generalized Nariai, with one structural gap: the Maxwell claim only covers the axial sector. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.19863 v1 pith:OREGGAEX submitted 2026-07-22 gr-qc

Xin Qin , Xiongying Qiao , Qiyuan Pan , Xiangyun Fu , Xuan Zhou , Ying Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C5083C2083C15
keywords quasinormalmodesEinsteintensorcouplingnonminimalNariaispacetimescalarperturbationsMaxwellhigher-dimensionalgravitypurelyimaginaryfrequencies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that a particular nonminimal curvature coupling—adding an Einstein-tensor term to the Klein-Gordon and Maxwell actions—produces analytically tractable, qualitatively different quasinormal-mode (QNM) spectra for scalar and electromagnetic perturbations in generalized Nariai spacetimes (products of a two-dimensional de Sitter space with several two-spheres, carrying electric and multiple magnetic charges). By reducing each radial perturbation equation to hypergeometric form, the authors obtain closed-form QNM frequencies in which the squared real part ω_R² depends explicitly on the coupling constant η. They find that ω_R² increases with η for the scalar field but decreases with η for the Maxwell field, and that each spectrum has a distinct critical coupling at which the effective radial propagation coefficient diverges: η_c^(s) = (Σ_{m=2}^d R_m^{-2})^{-1} for the scalar and η_c^(M) = −(4 Σ_{k=2}^d R_k^{-2})^{-1} for the Maxwell field. On one side of each critical value there is a parameter interval in which ω_R² < 0, so the QNMs become purely imaginary and non-oscillatory. If correct, this is an exact demonstration that the same curvature coupling acts spin-dependently on black-hole-like perturbation spectra, with magnetic charge enhancing and spacetime dimension narrowing the oscillatory regime.

What carries the argument

The central object is the modified radial propagation coefficient—the square-root argument of the QNM frequency—built from the Einstein-tensor coupling terms h_j(η) (scalar) and q_j(η) (Maxwell) together with curvature sums over the sphere factors. The reduction method is the hypergeometric solution of the radial master equations: using the tortoise coordinate and y = 1/2 + 1/2 tanh(r_*/R_1), each master equation becomes a hypergeometric equation whose boundary conditions yield quantization via gamma-function poles (c−a = −n or c−b = −n). This yields closed-form frequencies where the coupling appears only in the square-root term, and the critical values η_c follow from the zeros of the prefa

What would settle it

Numerically solve the full coupled Maxwell perturbation equations (including the polar sector, without the gauge truncation) in the same generalized Nariai background and compare the resulting QNM frequencies to Eq. (49); if the polar sector yields a different singular coupling or contributes differently to ω_R², the paper's central comparison would be refuted. Alternatively, a direct numerical evolution of the scalar radial equation (16) should reproduce the closed-form frequencies of Eq. (32); any deviation would indicate an algebraic error in the hypergeometric reduction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's core claim is embodied in Eq. (32)/(34) and Eq. (49). For a scalar field with action term η G^μν ∂_μ Φ ∂_ν Φ and a Maxwell field with coupling −η G^μρ F_{μν} F^ν_ρ, the QNM frequencies in the generalized Nariai background are ω = ±√( (μ² + Σ_j ℓ_j(ℓ_j+1) h_j(η)/R_j²) / (1 − η Σ_m 1/R_m²) − 1/(4R_1²) ) + i(2n+1)/(2R_1) for the scalar, and the analogous expression with q_j(η) and the prefactor (1 + 4η Σ_k 1/R_k²)^{-1} for the Maxwell axial sector. The coupling enters only through the square-root argument, so ω_R² has a simple rational dependence on η, with a pole at the critical couplings η_c^(s) and η_c^(M). Across those poles ω_R² changes sign, producing intervals of purely imagi

Load-bearing premise

The Maxwell-field QNM derivation restricts to the axial (odd-parity) sector and removes pure-gradient modes by gauge; if the polar sector produces a different effective potential and critical coupling, the claimed comparison of how the coupling affects scalar versus Maxwell spectra would be incomplete.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For both scalar and Maxwell fields there is an open interval of coupling constants in which the QNM frequencies are purely imaginary (ω_R = 0), so the perturbations do not oscillate; the interval is bounded by the critical coupling η_c and the zero-crossing η_t where ω_R² = 0.
  • The scalar and Maxwell critical couplings have opposite signs and differ by a factor of four: η_c^(s) = +(Σ R_m^{-2})^{-1} versus η_c^(M) = −(4Σ R_k^{-2})^{-1}, placing the non-oscillatory regime on opposite sides of zero for the two fields.
  • Under the admissible horizon boundary conditions (I and IV), the imaginary part of the frequency is either positive (growing modes) or negative (damped modes), so stability is fixed by the boundary condition choice rather than by the coupling strength.
  • Magnetic charge Q_2 increases ω_R² for both fields, strengthening the oscillatory response, while increasing spacetime dimension D narrows the purely imaginary intervals for both fields.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Maxwell derivation covers only the axial (odd-parity) sector, as the paper itself notes; an earlier four-dimensional result cited in the paper shows the Einstein-tensor coupling is parity-sensitive, so the polar sector could yield a different effective potential and critical coupling, which would alter the abstract-level scalar-vs-Maxwell comparison if not included.
  • The exact solvability in Nariai spacetimes suggests the same cancellation structure could appear in other product geometries (e.g., near-horizon limits of charged black holes); one could test whether the factor-4 ratio and opposite signs of the critical couplings are generic to Einstein-tensor couplings or specific to the dS_2 × (S^2)^{d-1} background.
  • The divergence of ω_R² as η → η_c for the scalar could signal a breakdown of the linear perturbation treatment at strong coupling; the closed-form formulas provide benchmark values for numerical evolution codes to probe the onset of nonlinear effects.
  • The purely imaginary QNM interval, whose width shrinks with dimension and is sensitive to magnetic charge, offers a concrete signature that could in principle constrain η if ringdown observations in higher-dimensional or near-horizon scenarios become available.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies quasinormal modes of scalar and Maxwell fields with a nonminimal Einstein-tensor coupling in generalized Nariai spacetimes (dS2 × product of spheres). By reducing the radial equations to hypergeometric form and imposing horizon boundary conditions, the authors obtain closed-form QNM frequencies: Eqs. (32)/(34) for the scalar and Eq. (49) for the Maxwell field. The coupling η enters the squared real frequency through a rational factor, producing a critical value at which ω_R^2 diverges and a parameter interval in which ω_R^2<0, corresponding to purely imaginary modes. The scalar and Maxwell critical couplings have opposite signs, and the paper concludes that η shifts ω_R^2 in opposite directions for the two fields; magnetic charge increases ω_R^2, while higher spacetime dimension narrows the purely imaginary interval.

Significance. The scalar part is a clean analytic result, derived without numerical fitting, and the η=0 limit is sensible. If the Maxwell result is understood as applying to a specific parity sector, the paper still provides an exact demonstration that a nonminimal Einstein-tensor coupling can produce spin-dependent critical behavior in a higher-dimensional near-horizon geometry. However, the unqualified comparison between scalar and 'Maxwell perturbations' in the abstract and conclusions goes beyond what is actually derived, because the Maxwell calculation is restricted to one parity sector. The stability claims also need qualification. With those issues addressed, the paper would be a useful contribution to the analytic QNM literature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV, Eqs. (37)-(41)] The Maxwell derivation is introduced as 'the axial sector is considered' after Eq. (37), but the ansatz contains temporo-radial components A0 Y dt + A1 Y dr* that are polar-type scalar harmonics and curl-type angular terms that are axial-type. The master variable in Eq. (38) is constructed from A0 and A1, i.e. from the polar-type components; no pure axial-sector equation with A0=A1=0 is derived. Since the Introduction cites Ref. [38], which shows that the Einstein-tensor coupling to a vector field is parity-sensitive, Eq. (41) and Eq. (49) cannot be claimed to describe 'Maxwell perturbations' in general. The abstract and Sec. V compare scalar perturbations with 'Maxwell perturbations' without this qualification. Either derive the complementary sector and show isospectrality or the same qualitative behavior, or restrict the claims to the sector actually treated. This is a structural gap i
  2. [Sec. V and Eqs. (34), (49)] The stability summary states that under boundary condition (IV) the imaginary part is negative and the perturbation is damped. However, Eq. (34) is ω = ± sqrt(X) − i(2n+1)/(2R1). In the purely imaginary interval X<0, the branch with the '+' sign in front of the square root has Im ω = sqrt(|X|) − (2n+1)/(2R1), which is positive sufficiently close to η_c where |X| is large. The same issue occurs in Eq. (49). Thus the stability classification is not uniform; the authors should specify which sign branch is selected for each boundary condition and revise the blanket stability statements.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Notation throughout] The symbol d is used both for D/2 and as the differential in equations such as Eqs. (2) and (4); this is confusing and should be disambiguated, e.g. by using n or N for the dimension factor.
  2. [Eqs. (32), (34), (49)] The ± signs in front of the square root and the imaginary term are not tied explicitly to the pole conditions c−a=−n versus c−b=−n. Please specify which sign combination corresponds to each admissible boundary condition.
  3. [Sec. III, definition of η_t] The quantity η_t is defined only implicitly by ω_R^2=0. Give the explicit equation and state the conditions under which the purely imaginary interval exists, since this is central to the plots and the qualitative discussion.
  4. [Secs. III and IV] At η=0 the formulas should reduce to the known uncoupled QNMs of Ref. [25]. An explicit check in the text would make the reduction transparent and strengthen confidence in the Maxwell result.
  5. [Figures 1-6] The axis labels in the compiled figures are hard to read, particularly the quantity plotted on the vertical axis. Ensure the labels include the correct factors of R_1^2 and clearly state whether ω_R^2 or ω_R^2 R_1^2 is shown.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the QNM formulas are derived analytically from the action and the background metric.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity. The scalar sector starts from the action (8), obtains the modified Klein-Gordon equation (9), reduces it to the radial equation (16) on the generalized Nariai background, and then solves it in closed hypergeometric form. The QNM frequencies (32) and (34) follow from imposing the boundary conditions on the hypergeometric connection formulas. The critical coupling η_c^(s) = (Σ_m 1/R_m^2)^-1 is exactly the pole of the effective radial coefficient where the denominator 1 − η Σ_m 1/R_m^2 vanishes; it is not a fitted parameter and is not imported from any prior result. Likewise, for Maxwell perturbations, equation (36) follows directly from the Lagrangian (35), the axial ansatz (37) produces the master equation (41), and the frequencies (49) are obtained from the same hypergeometric boundary-condition procedure. The Maxwell critical value η_c^(M) = −(4 Σ_k 1/R_k^2)^-1 is again the pole of the explicitly derived effective coefficient. The central comparative claim that ω_R^2 increases with η for the scalar and decreases for the Maxwell axial sector is an algebraic consequence of these derived formulas, not a restatement of an input. The only inherited ingredient is the background metric from Ref. [24], which is used as a stated premise, and standard hypergeometric identities. Citations such as [24], [25], and [38] are contextual or motivational and are not load-bearing for the frequency formulas. The limitation that the Maxwell analysis treats only the axial sector is an assumption of the derivation, not a circular reduction: the axial-sector result does not presuppose the polar-sector outcome and remains independently testable. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' own prior work to force the result. Thus no circular step is present, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data are fitted and no new entities are postulated. The central claim rests on standard hypergeometric identities, the background solution of [24], the choice of admissible boundary conditions, the axial-sector restriction for Maxwell, and an implicit assumption that the kinetic sign flip is not disqualifying. These are listed above.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The generalized Nariai metric (4)-(7) is an exact solution of the Einstein-Maxwell-Λ system.
    Taken from [24] without re-derivation; all perturbation calculations assume this background.
  • domain assumption Conditions (I) and (IV) are the only admissible QNM boundary conditions.
    Stated in Sec. III: 'only conditions (I) and (IV) lead to well defined QNM spectra, as in the uncoupled case'; used to select discrete frequencies.
  • ad hoc to paper The axial parity sector is sufficient to characterize Maxwell perturbations.
    Sec. IV restricts to the axial sector of the vector spherical harmonic decomposition and removes the pure gradient part by gauge; the polar sector is not treated, yet conclusions are drawn about 'Maxwell field perturbations'.
  • ad hoc to paper Kinetic coefficient sign changes at the critical couplings do not invalidate the analysis.
    Eq. (12) has factor 1−ηΣ R_m^{-2}, which changes sign for η>η_c^(s); Eq. (41) has factor 1+4ηΣ R_k^{-2}, which changes sign for η<η_c^(M). The paper analyzes these regimes as physical without discussing ghost-like kinetic terms.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quasinormal modes of scalar and Maxwell field perturbations coupled to the Einstein tensor in generalized Nariai spacetimes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OREGGAEX

@misc{pith2026260719863,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quasinormal modes of scalar and Maxwell field perturbations coupled to the Einstein tensor in generalized Nariai spacetimes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OREGGAEX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.19863}
}
abstract

We investigate the quasinormal modes of scalar and Maxwell field perturbations coupled to the Einstein tensor in generalized Nariai spacetimes. Our results show that, for both types of perturbations, the coupling introduces different critical values, which separate the frequency spectrum into distinct branches. Near these critical values, the square-root term that determines $\omega_R^2$ may change sign, giving rise to a parameter interval in which the modes are purely imaginary. Away from this regime, the coupling affects the oscillatory parts of the two fields in opposite ways: $\omega_R^2$ generally increases with the coupling constant $\eta$ for the scalar field, whereas it decreases with $\eta$ for the Maxwell field. The magnetic charge tends to enhance the oscillatory response, while increasing the spacetime dimension narrows the purely imaginary regime. This comparison shows analytically that the same curvature coupling can affect scalar and Maxwell perturbations in qualitatively different ways.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19863 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Effects of the coupling parameter η on the squared real part ω 2 R of the QNM frequencies of scalar field perturbations in generalized Nariai spacetimes. The upper and lower panels show the branches on the two sides of the corresponding critical value η (s) c . Here D = 4, Q1 = 0.01, Λ = 0.05 and µ = 0.01. To impose the boundary conditions near y = 1, the hypergeometric functions are rewritten in terms of (1 − y): F… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effects of the magnetic charge Q2 on the squared real part ω 2 R of the QNM frequencies of scalar field perturbations in generalized Nariai spacetimes. Here D = 4, Q1 = 0.01, Λ = 0.05 and µ = 0.01. At r∗ → +∞, condition (I) requires the coefficient of e iωr∗ to vanish. Since α ̸= 0, this is achieved when one of the gamma functions in the denominator diverges, namely Γ(c − a) → ∞ or Γ(c − b) → ∞. Under this condition… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Effects of the spacetime dimension D on the critical coupling η s c and the width ∆η of scalar field perturbations in generalized Nariai spacetimes. Here Q1 = 0.01, Λ = 0.05, µ = 0.01 and ℓ = 1. For D > 4, the remaining magnetic charges are fixed as Q3 = · · · = Qd = 0.01. perturbations and a dynamically stable system. Notably, the squared real part of the frequency, ω 2 R , exhibits an explicit dependence on η. The… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Effects of the coupling parameter η on the squared real part ω 2 R of the QNM frequencies of Maxwell field perturbation in generalized Nariai spacetimes. The upper and lower panels show the branches on the two sides of the corresponding critical value η (M) c . Here Q1…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Effects of the magnetic charge Q2 on the squared real part ω 2 R of the QNM frequencies of Maxwell field perturbation in generalized Nariai spacetimes. Here Q1 = 0.01 and Λ = 0.05. For convenience, we define ΞM(η) ≡ X d j=2 qj (η)ℓj (ℓj + 1)R2 1 R2 j " 1 + 4η X d k=2 1…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Effects of the spacetime dimension D on the critical coupling η (M) c and the width ∆η of Maxwell field perturbations in generalized Nariai spacetimes. Here Q1 = 0.01, Λ = 0.05 and ℓ = 1. For D > 4, the remaining magnetic charges are fixed as Q3 = · · · = Qd = 0.01. ρ …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [25]

    Venˆancio and C

    J. Venˆancio and C. Batista,Quasinormal modes in generalized Nariai spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D97, 105025 (2018)

    2018

  2. [38]

    Chen and J

    S. Chen and J. Jing,Dynamical evolution of a vector field perturbation coupled to the Ein- stein tensor, Phys. Rev. D90, 124059 (2014)

    2014

  3. [1]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo),Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016)

    2016

  4. [2]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo),GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017)

    2017

  5. [3]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific),GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coales- cences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023)

    2023

  6. [4]

    A.Bonanno, R.A.Konoplya, G.Oglialoro, A.Spina,Regular Black Holes from Proper-Time flow in Quantum Gravity and their Quasinormal modes, Shadow and Hawking radiation. J. Cosmo. Astro. Phys.12, 042 (2025)

    2025

  7. [5]

    M. F. S. Alves, B. P. Pˆonquio, L. G. Medeiros ,Critical masses and numerical computation of massive scalar quasinormal modes in Schwarzschild black holes, Phys. Rev. D112, 124007 (2025)

    2025

  8. [6]

    Ahmed, S

    F. Ahmed, S. N. Gashti, A. Bouzenada, B. Pourhassan,Schwarzschild-AdS Black Holes with Cloud of Strings and Quintessence: Geodesics, Thermodynamic Topology, and Quasinormal Modes, Nucl. Phys. B, 117260 (2025)

    2025

Show all 39 references
  1. [7]

    W. Deng, W. Liu, F. Long, K. Xiao, J. Jing,Quasinormal Modes of a Massive Scalar Field in Slowly Rotating Einstein-Bumblebee Black Holes, J. Cosmo. Astro. Phys.11, 028 (2025)

    2025

  2. [8]

    Q. Tan, S. Long, W. Deng, and J. Jing,Quasinormal modes and echoes of a double braneworld, J. High Energ. Phys.02, 055 (2025)

    2025

  3. [9]

    C. Chen, J. Jing, Z. Cao, M. Wang,Complete quasinormal modes of Type-D black holes, Phys. Rev. D112, 103036 (2025)

    2025

  4. [10]

    Naderi, A

    F. Naderi, A. Rezaei-Aghdam,Quasinormal modes of three-dimensional black holes in string theory, conformal gravity, and Hu-Sawicki theory via the Heun function, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1283 (2024)

    2024

  5. [11]

    L. Zhu, G. Fu, S. Li, D. Zhang, J. Wu,Quasinormal modes of a charged loop quantum black hole, Phys.Rev.D 11110, 104008 (2025)

    2025

  6. [12]

    Herceg, T

    N. Herceg, T. Juri´c, A. N. Kumara, A. Samsarov, I. Smoli´c,Noncommutative quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild black hole, J. High Energ. Phys.2025, 83 (2025). 13

    2025

  7. [13]

    Z. Yang, Y. Lei, X. Kuang, B. Wang,Gravitational odd-parity perturbation of a Horndeski hairy black hole: quasinormal mode and parameter constraint, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 100 (2025)

    2025

  8. [14]

    T. Chen, R. Cai, B. Hu,Quasinormal modes of gravitational perturbation for uniformly accelerated black holes, Phys. Rev. D109, 084049 (2024)

    2024

  9. [15]

    Lin,Quasinormal modes and echo effect of cylindrical anti-de Sitter black hole spacetime with a thin shell, Phys

    K. Lin,Quasinormal modes and echo effect of cylindrical anti-de Sitter black hole spacetime with a thin shell, Phys. Rev. D107, 124002 (2023)

    2023

  10. [16]

    Mukhi,String theory: A perspective over the last 25 years, Classical Quant

    S. Mukhi,String theory: A perspective over the last 25 years, Classical Quant. Grav.28, 153001 (2011)

    2011

  11. [17]

    Arkani, S

    N. Arkani, S. Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali,The Hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter. Phys. Lett. B,429, 263 (1998)

    1998

  12. [18]

    Antoniadis, N

    I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. Dvali,New dimensions at a mil- limeter to a Fermi and superstrings at a TeV. Phys. Lett. B,436, 257 (1998)

    1998

  13. [19]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum.An Alternative to compactification. Phys. Rev. Lett.,83, 4690 (1998)

    1998

  14. [20]

    Phys.38, 1113 (1999)

    Maldacena,The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int.J.Theor. Phys.38, 1113 (1999)

    1999

  15. [21]

    V. E. Hubeny,The AdS/CFT correspondence, Classical Quant. Grav.32, 124010 (2015)

    2015

  16. [22]

    Nariai,On a new cosmological solution of Einstein’s field equations of gravitation, Sci

    H. Nariai,On a new cosmological solution of Einstein’s field equations of gravitation, Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ.35, 62 (1951)

    1951

  17. [23]

    Kodama ,A

    H. Kodama ,A. Ishibashi,Master equations for perturbations of generalized static black holes with charge in higher dimensions, Prog. Theor. Phys.111, 29 (2004)

    2004

  18. [24]

    Carlos Batista1,Generalized charged Nariai solutions in arbitrary even dimensions with multiple magnetic charges, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.48, 160 (2016)

    2016

  19. [26]

    Karimabadi, D

    M. Karimabadi, D. M. Yekta and S. A. Alavi,Scalar field perturbations in Non- commutative Schwarzschild spacetime: Comparative analysis and Upper bound on non- commutativity.arXiv:2508.13820

    arXiv

  20. [27]

    S. Fan, W. Guo and C. Wu. Grey-body Factors and Absorption Cross Sections of Non- Commutative Black Holes under Einstein-Coupled Scalar Fields. Class. Quantum Grav. 43, 105024 (2026)

    2026

  21. [28]

    Chatzifotis, C

    N. Chatzifotis, C. Vlachos, K. Destounis and E. Papantonopoulos,Stability of black holes with non-minimally coupled scalar hair to the Einstein tensor, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.54, 49 (2022)

    2022

  22. [29]

    D. Wang, M. Sun, Q. Pan, J. Jing,Backreacting holographic superconductors from the coupling of a scalar field to the Einstein tensor, Phys. Lett. B785, 362 (2018)

    2018

  23. [30]

    M. Sun, D. Wang, Q. Pan, J. Jing,Generalized superconductors from the coupling of a scalar field to the Einstein tensor and their refractive index in massive gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 145 (2019)

    2019

  24. [31]

    Kuang, E

    X. Kuang, E. Papantonopoulos,Building a Holographic Superconductor with a Scalar Field Coupled Kinematically to Einstein Tensor, J. High Energy Phys.08, 161 (2016). 14

    2016

  25. [32]

    Chen and J

    S. Chen and J. Jing,Dynamical evolution of a scalar field coupling to Einstein’s tensor in the Reissner-Nordström black hole spacetime, Phys. Rev. D82, 084006 (2010)

    2010

  26. [33]

    Konoplya, Z

    R. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlík, and A. Zhidenko,Massive nonminimally coupled scalar field in Reissner-Nordström spacetime: Long-lived quasinormal modes and instability, Phys. Rev. D 98, 104033 (2018)

    2018

  27. [34]

    Abdalla, B

    E. Abdalla, B. Cuadros-Melgar, R. Fontana, J. de Oliveira, E. Papantonopoulos, and A. Pavan,Instability of Reissner-Nordström-AdS black hole under perturbations of a scalar field coupled to Einstein tensor, Phys. Rev. D 99, 104065 (2019)

    2019

  28. [35]

    Chen and J

    S. Chen and J. Jing.Dynamical evolution of the electromagnetic perturbation with Weyl corrections, Phys. Rev. D 88, 064058 (2013)

    2013

  29. [36]

    R. Kase, M. Minamitsuji, S. Tsujikawa and Y. Zhang,Black hole perturbations in vector- tensor theories: The odd-mode analysis, J. Cosmo. Astro. Phys.02048 (2018)

    2018

  30. [37]

    C. Chen, A. D. Felice and S. Tsujikawa. Linear stability of vector Horndeski black holes. J. Cosmo. Astro. Phys.07022 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    R. Dutt, A. Khare, and U. P. Sukhatme,Supersymmetry, shape invariance, and exactly solvable potentials, Am. J. Phys.56, 163 (1988). 15

    1988

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.