Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 2 cited by

Energy-Efficient SIM-assisted Communications: How Many Layers Do We Need?

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that hybrid digital and wave-based precoding maximizes energy efficiency in SIM-assisted multiuser MISO downlinks, and that 2-5 SIM layers give near-optimal performance for both energy and spectral efficiency.

desk verdict Competent SIM energy-efficiency study with a genuine SCA objective mismatch and an unmeasured-power dependence behind the 2–5 layer rule; deserves review but not acceptance as is. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.15737 v1 pith:OT22AYEK submitted 2025-04-22 cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT

Enyu Shi , Jiayi Zhang , Jiancheng An , Marco Di Renzo , Bo Ai , Chau Yuen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ITeess.SPmath.IT
keywords stackedintelligentmetasurfaceenergyefficiencyhybridprecodingwave-basedbeamformingmulti-userMISOalternatingoptimizationsemidefiniteprogrammingprojectedgradientascent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to establish that a stacked intelligent metasurface (SIM) mounted at a multi-antenna base station can be jointly optimized with digital precoding to maximize the downlink energy efficiency of a multiuser MISO system, while respecting per-user rate and per-antenna power limits. The problem is a non-convex fractional program, and the paper solves it with an alternating optimization loop: a quadratic transform handles the ratio objective, successive convex approximation updates the digital precoders, and either semidefinite programming or projected gradient ascent tunes the SIM phase shifts. The quantitative claim is that this hybrid design achieves up to 80% higher energy efficiency than digital precoding without SIM beamforming. The practical sizing claim is that although the layer count that maximizes spectral efficiency differs from the one that maximizes energy efficiency, 2 to 5 SIM layers give satisfactory performance on both metrics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the wave-based beamforming matrix $G = \Phi_M W_M \cdots \Phi_1$, built from $M$ stacked metasurface layers, each a diagonal phase-shift matrix $\Phi_m$, separated by diffraction-based transmission matrices $W_m$. This matrix is what turns the SIM into an analog beamformer that can orthogonalize user channels before the digital precoder acts. The argument is carried by the alternating optimization loop: the fractional energy-efficiency objective is reformulated with a quadratic transform, the digital precoders are updated by successive convex approximation with an approximate indicator function for RF-chain activation, and the SIM phase shifts are updated either by semidefinite programming or by projected gradient ascent using the closed-form gradient of the sum rate with respect to each phase shift.

What would settle it

Measure the actual power consumption of a fabricated SIM's meta-atoms and controller, then recompute the energy-efficiency versus layer-count curves in the paper with those measured constants; if the measured $P_{\rm meta}$ and $P_{\rm controller}$ depart substantially from 10 dBm and 25 dBm, the 2-5 layer recommendation should move accordingly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the best energy-efficient transmitter for a SIM-assisted base station is a hybrid of digital precoding and wave-based beamforming, not either mechanism alone. The SIM's stacked phase-shift layers reshape the effective channel, creating extra optimization space, while the digital precoder controls multiuser interference and selects which RF chains and antennas stay active. Under the assumed power model, energy efficiency is not monotone in hardware scale: adding layers or meta-atoms first improves the achievable sum rate and then hurts efficiency because every added meta-atom contributes a term $N M P_{\rm meta}$ to the power budget. The numerical conclusion is that 2-5 layers is a robust compromise, with the proposed hybrid design beating digital-only precoding by up to 80% in energy efficiency.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the SIM's fixed power costs are 10 dBm per meta-atom and 25 dBm for the controller; the paper itself notes that no large-scale experimental data yet pins these values down, and changing them shifts the optimal layer count.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A base station that adds a SIM and runs the proposed hybrid design can expect up to an 80% energy-efficiency gain over the same station using only digital precoding, under the assumed channel and power model.
  • Energy efficiency peaks at an intermediate number of layers and then falls, so designers should size the SIM stack rather than simply adding layers; the paper's recommended range is 2-5 layers.
  • Using the SDP-based SIM update buys about a 7% energy-efficiency gain over the projected-gradient update, at substantially higher computational cost, so the choice between the two is a quantified accuracy-complexity tradeoff.
  • More meta-atoms per layer can substitute for more base station antennas, giving a hardware design knob that trades array size against SIM size.
  • Joint RF-chain and antenna selection keeps energy efficiency rising as antennas are added, whereas without selection it would peak near L=8 and decline.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If hardware measurements show per-meta-atom power far below 10 dBm, the optimal layer count will likely move above 5; if the controller or meta-atom power is higher than assumed, fewer layers will look better.
  • The same alternating structure should transfer to near-field, wideband, and cell-free massive MIMO settings, where the channel model changes but the tradeoff between wave-domain gains and fixed SIM power remains.
  • A prototype measurement campaign that records actual power draw per meta-atom and per controller, together with achieved rates, is the direct test of whether 2-5 layers is the right sizing rule.
  • The layer-count result also suggests that SIM hardware designers should aim to make per-meta-atom power scale down with array size, since the fixed $N M P_{\rm meta}$ term is precisely what caps the useful number of layers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper studies the energy efficiency (EE) of a stacked-intelligent-metasurface (SIM)-assisted multi-user MISO downlink with hybrid digital precoding at the base station and wave-based beamforming across multiple SIM layers. The authors present a power consumption model for the SIM-assisted BS (Eqs. (6)-(12)), formulate the joint digital precoding and SIM phase-shift design as a non-convex EE maximization problem (P0 in Eq. (16)), and solve it via an alternating optimization framework: a quadratic transformation for the fractional objective, an SCA-based update for the BS precoding (Section III-C), and both SDP-based and projected-gradient-ascent (PGA) algorithms for the SIM phases (Section III-D). Extensive simulations evaluate EE and spectral efficiency versus the number of antennas, meta-atoms, layers, and power parameters. The central conclusions are that the proposed hybrid precoding improves EE by up to 80% over digital precoding without SIM beamforming, and that 2 to 5 SIM layers provide a good compromise between EE and SE.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper provides a useful design rule for SIM hardware sizing and a joint precoding algorithm with an explicit power model, going beyond the SE-only studies in the SIM literature. The numerical study is broad (Figs. 2-10), the complexity analysis is included, and the authors are candid about the lack of experimental grounding for the SIM power constants (footnote 5). The layer-count guidance (2-5 layers) is a falsifiable, practically relevant claim that would interest system designers. However, the significance is contingent on (i) correcting the mismatch between the stated EE objective and the actual SCA subproblem solved at the base station, and (ii) demonstrating the robustness of the layer-count recommendation to the unmeasured power constants.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III-C, Eq. (29a) vs. Eqs. (17) and (20a)] The SCA subproblem in Eq. (29a) is inconsistent with the objective defined in Eq. (17) and used in Eq. (20a). The quadratic-transform objective is f = 2t (sum_k log2(1+gamma_k))^{1/2} - t^2 P_total, with the square root applied to the sum of rates. In (29a), the objective is instead written as 2t sum_k (log2(1+gamma_k))^{1/2} - t^2 P_total, with the square root applied to each rate before summation. Since sqrt(sum_k R_k) <= sum_k sqrt(R_k) for nonnegative R_k, the surrogate in (29a) is an upper bound on the true objective, not a lower-bound surrogate of the kind required for a monotone SCA/MM procedure. Consequently, the paper provides no proof that the iterates of (29a) monotonically increase the EE defined in (15) or converge to a stationary point of P0; the BS precoding block is the first block of the AO loop, so Figures 2-9 are generated by an algorithm that optimizes a different objective than the one stated. The claims that the proposed framework maximizes EE and achieves an 80% EE improvement are therefore not justified as written. The authors should either correct (29a) to keep the outer square root (the resulting objective in gamma remains concave), provide a valid lower-bound surrogate with an ascent proof, or re-derive the SCA around the true objective and re-run the simulations.
  2. [Table I, Eqs. (11)-(12), footnote 5, Figs. 8-10] The headline design rule of the paper, that 2 to 5 SIM layers yield satisfactory EE and SE, is a numerical outcome of the power model in Eqs. (11)-(12) with P_meta = 10 dBm and P_controller = 25 dBm. Footnote 5 states that no large-scale experimental data quantify SIM controller power consumption, and P_meta is likewise a chosen value. Because the marginal cost of adding a layer is N*P_meta, the location of the EE peak in Fig. 8 is directly controlled by these unmeasured constants. Fig. 10 sweeps P_meta for a fixed M=4, but no sensitivity of the optimal number of layers to P_meta or P_controller is reported, and the abstract and conclusion state the 2-5 layer guidance without this caveat. The claim in footnote 5 that P_controller 'does not affect the overall trends and conclusions' is also not generally true: as an additive constant in the denominator of (15), P_controller changes the ratio R(M)/P(M) across M and can shift the argmax, so this claim should either be proven or removed. I recommend re-scoping the conclusions or adding a systematic sensitivity analysis (e.g., a two-parameter sweep over P_meta and P_controller) to establish the robustness of the 2-5 layer recommendation.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Eq. (44) vs. Eq. (52)] In Eq. (44), chi_k is defined with a summation over all j from 1 to K, whereas Eq. (52) defines zeta_k (of which chi_k is the reciprocal, per the proof in (51)-(53)) with a summation over j != k. The summation in (44) should exclude j = k; as displayed, the two expressions are inconsistent and the quotient-rule derivation does not follow.
  2. [Theorem 1, Eqs. (45) and (54)] The gradient formula in Eq. (45) and its derivation in Eq. (54) are mutually inconsistent: (45) uses 2 Im[(e^{jφ} h^H b (q)^H W1 p_k)(h^H G W1 p_k)], while (54) yields Im[(e^{jφ} h^H b (q)^H W1 p_j)^H (h^H G W1 p_j)] without the factor of 2. The correct derivative of |f(φ)|^2 with respect to φ for f = e^{jφ} a + c is 2 Im[A^* f] with A = e^{jφ} a; the displayed (45) lacks the conjugation and (54) lacks the factor of 2. Since (48) updates the phases using this gradient, the formulas should be corrected and the PGA implementation checked against them.
  3. [Algorithm 1, line 21] The outer stopping criterion reads |Opt(r) − Opt(r)|/Opt(r) ≤ ε, which compares Opt(r) with itself; it should presumably read |Opt(r) − Opt(r−1)|/Opt(r) ≤ ε.
  4. [Algorithm 1, step 10] Step 10 says 'Compute {p_k} by solving the problem in (18)', but the BS precoding subproblem solved at that point is (29), not (18).
  5. [Section III-D1, text before Eq. (42)] The sentence 'the problem in (42) is not convex' appears before problem (42) is defined and evidently refers to problem (35); also, 'the coupling of variables coupling' contains a duplicated word. In the same paragraph, 'the problem P_SDP in (42)' should refer to the convex approximation \hat{P}_SDP.
  6. [Remark 3 and Eq. (27)] The smoothing parameter ε in the indicator approximation (27) is not reported in Table I or in the simulation setup. Since Remark 3 states the activation threshold is x ≥ 10^{-4}, the authors should specify the ε used so that the simulation is reproducible.
  7. [Eqs. (35)-(42), rank-one relaxation] The rank-one relaxation via (40)-(41) is claimed to 'ultimately arriv[e] at a rank-one solution' as ε_m increases to 1, but no numerical evidence for the achieved rank of V_m (for example, the λ_max/Tr(V_m) ratio or the final ε_m) is reported; without such evidence, the SDP results cannot be verified as solutions of the rank-constrained problem.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the EE objective, layer-count guidance, and benchmark gains emerge from simulations with stated channel and power assumptions; self-citations are contextual support, not load-bearing inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The EE metric is defined in (15) from the sum rate and total power model in (12), and the optimization problem in (16) maximizes that defined metric. The quadratic transform in (17) is the standard fractional-programming reformulation, and the subsequent SCA and SDP/PGA subproblems are derived from the same SINR and power expressions rather than from the paper's conclusions. The central practical claim, that 2 to 5 SIM layers offer a good compromise, is presented as a numerical outcome of sweeping M and N in Figs. 8-9 under the fixed simulation parameters in Table I; it is not a parameter fitted to produce a prechosen answer. Likewise, the 80% EE improvement claim is a simulation comparison against Digital-Pre and Wave-SIM baselines, not a quantity forced by construction. The paper's self-citations, including [39] for SIM channel distances and for the upper-boundedness invoked in Remark 6 for PGA convergence, provide technical background and convergence support but do not define the central results. Footnote 5 explicitly states that there is no large-scale experimental data quantifying SIM controller power consumption; this is a data-availability limitation and parameter-sensitivity concern, not circularity. The skeptical observation about Eq. (29a), where the square root is applied to each rate term rather than to the sum as in (17) and (20a), identifies a possible mathematical inconsistency between the displayed convex subproblem and the stated EE objective. That is a correctness or implementation-fidelity issue, not an input-output reduction of the kind required for a circularity finding under the hard rules. Accordingly, no circular steps are identified and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim (2-5 layers optimal, 80% EE gain) rests on a power model with hand-picked constants P_meta and P_controller and on a product-wave channel model. The paper contributes the optimization framework; the quantitative guidance is conditional on these assumptions, which are not experimentally validated.

free parameters (5)
  • P_meta = 10 dBm (0.01 W)
    Per-meta-atom power consumption, chosen by hand and used in Eq. (12) and Table I. It directly controls the N M P_meta term, so the optimal number of layers in Figs. 8-9 depends on this value. No experimental measurement is provided.
  • P_controller = 25 dBm (0.316 W)
    Fixed SIM controller power, chosen by hand; footnote 5 states there is no experimental data for this quantity. It shapes the layer-count guidance by adding a fixed power offset.
  • P_RF^active = 0.4 W
    Static power of an active RF chain, taken from [45]. It affects the antenna selection tradeoff and the EE peak in Fig. 3.
  • RF activation threshold rho_l = 10^-4
    Threshold for the indicator function modeling RF chain activation (Remark 3), chosen by hand. It influences which antennas are considered active.
  • P_UE = 20 dBm (0.1 W)
    Fixed per-UE power consumption, taken from prior work [12], [44] and added to P_total in Eq. (6). It shifts the EE levels but not the qualitative tradeoffs.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Inter-layer propagation follows Rayleigh-Sommerfeld diffraction with the coefficient in Eq. (1), neglecting multiple reflections between layers.
    The product channel model (2) assumes waves pass through each layer exactly once; this is standard in SIM literature but not experimentally verified in this paper.
  • domain assumption Perfect CSI at the BS for the entire SIM-based channel.
    Stated in Section III-A: 'we assume that the BS acquires perfect CSI of the entire SIM-based multi-user MISO system in advance.' No channel estimation overhead or errors are modeled.
  • domain assumption Phase shifts of each meta-atom are continuously tunable in [0, 2π) with no quantization or hardware error.
    Constraint (16e) and the algorithms assume continuous unit-modulus control; practical meta-atoms may have discrete states and insertion losses.
  • domain assumption The spatial correlation of h_SIM,k follows the sinc model R_n,n' = sinc(2 d_n,n' / lambda) from [42], with Rayleigh fading.
    Used for channel generation in simulations; affects the numerical results but not the algorithm design.
  • ad hoc to paper The power consumption model treats P_meta and P_controller as fixed constants, independent of phase configuration and signal level.
    This modeling choice in Eqs. (11)-(12) drives the layer-count tradeoff. It is not derived or empirically supported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Energy-Efficient SIM-assisted Communications: How Many Layers Do We Need?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OT22AYEK

@misc{pith2026250415737,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Energy-Efficient SIM-assisted Communications: How Many Layers Do We Need?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OT22AYEK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.15737}
}
read the original abstract

The stacked intelligent metasurface (SIM), comprising multiple layers of reconfigurable transmissive metasurfaces, is becoming an increasingly viable solution for future wireless communication systems. In this paper, we explore the integration of SIM in a multi-antenna base station for application to downlink multi-user communications, and a realistic power consumption model for SIM-assisted systems is presented. Specifically, we focus on maximizing the energy efficiency (EE) for hybrid precoding design, i.e., the base station digital precoding and SIM wave-based beamforming. Due to the non-convexity and high complexity of the formulated problem, we employ the quadratic transformation method to reformulate the optimization problem and propose an alternating optimization (AO)-based joint precoding framework. Specifically, a successive convex approximation (SCA) algorithm is adopted for the base station precoding design. For the SIM wave-based beamforming, two algorithms are employed: the high-performance semidefinite programming (SDP) method and the low-complexity projected gradient ascent (PGA) algorithm. In particular, the results indicate that while the optimal number of SIM layers for maximizing the EE and spectral efficiency differs, a design of 2 to 5 layers can achieve satisfactory performance for both. Finally, numerical results are illustrated to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed hybrid precoding framework and to showcase the performance enhancement achieved by the algorithm in comparison to benchmark schemes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.15737 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the considered SIM-based multi-use [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. EE against the number of iterations (L = 4, M = 4, K = 4, Pmax = 35 dBm, P max l = 30 dBm, Pmeta = 10 dBm, γmin k = 0 dB). 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 107 80% 15% 7% [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Average EE against the number of BS antennas and the nu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Average EE against the number of SIM meta-atoms per la [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Average sum SE against the number of SIM meta-atoms pe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Average EE against the number of SIM layers and the num [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Average sum SE against the number of SIM layers and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Enhancing Energy and Spectral Efficiency in IoT-Cellular Networks via Active SIM-Equipped LEO Satellites

    eess.SY 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Simulation results claim an active multi-layer metasurface on a LEO satellite improves spectral and energy efficiency over single-layer RIS designs, but the supporting equations contain serious internal inconsistencies.

  2. A Refined Alternating Optimization for Sum Rate Maximization in SIM-Aided Multiuser MISO Systems

    eess.SP 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Optimizing SIM phase shifts before the digital beamformer, with an inner iterative projected-gradient loop, achieves up to 115.53% higher achievable sum rate than benchmark AO schemes in simulation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [38]

    Energy -efficient designs for SIM-based broadcast MIMO systems,

    N. S. Perovi´ c, E. E. Bahingayi, and L.-N. Tran, “Energy -efficient designs for SIM-based broadcast MIMO systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.00628, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    On the road to 6G: Visions, requirements, key technologies and testbeds,

    C.-X. Wang, X. Y ou, X. Gao, X. Zhu, Z. Li, C. Zhang, H. Wang, Y . Huang, Y . Chen, H. Haas et al. , “On the road to 6G: Visions, requirements, key technologies and testbeds,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 905–974, Feb. 2023

    2023

  3. [2]

    Holographic MIM O communications: Theoretical foundations, enabling techn ologies, and future directions,

    T. Gong, P . Gavriilidis, R. Ji, C. Huang, G. C. Alexandrop oulos, L. Wei, Z. Zhang, M. Debbah, H. V . Poor, and C. Y uen, “Holographic MIM O communications: Theoretical foundations, enabling techn ologies, and future directions,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts , vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 196–257, Jan. 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [3]

    Performance analysis and low-complexity design fo r XL- MIMO with near-field spatial non-stationarities,

    K. Zhi, C. Pan, H. Ren, K. K. Chai, C.-X. Wang, R. Schober, a nd X. Y ou, “Performance analysis and low-complexity design fo r XL- MIMO with near-field spatial non-stationarities,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1656–1672, Jun. 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [4]

    Opt imal Bi- linear Equalizer for Cell-Free Massive MIMO Systems over Co rrelated Rician Channels,

    Z. Wang, J. Zhang, E. Bj¨ ornson, D. Niyato, and B. Ai, “Opt imal Bi- linear Equalizer for Cell-Free Massive MIMO Systems over Co rrelated Rician Channels,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , to appear, 2025

    work page 2025

  6. [5]

    Modeling and performance ana lysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Modeling and performance ana lysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., early access , 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [6]

    A survey of energy-efficient techniques for 5G networ ks and challenges ahead,

    S. Buzzi, I. Chih-Lin, T. E. Klein, H. V . Poor, C. Y ang, and A. Zap- pone, “A survey of energy-efficient techniques for 5G networ ks and challenges ahead,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 697–709, Apr. 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [7]

    RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO systems for 6 G: Fundamentals, system design, and applications,

    E. Shi, J. Zhang, H. Du, B. Ai, C. Y uen, D. Niyato, K. B. Leta ief, and X. Shen, “RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO systems for 6 G: Fundamentals, system design, and applications,” Proc. IEEE , vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 331–364, Apr. 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 54 references
  1. [8]

    Intelligent reflecting surface enhan ced wire- less network via joint active and passive beamforming,

    Q. Wu and R. Zhang, “Intelligent reflecting surface enhan ced wire- less network via joint active and passive beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 5394–5409, Nov. 2019

    2019

  2. [9]

    Smart radio environments emp owered by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: How it works, state of research, and the road ahead,

    M. Di Renzo, A. Zappone, M. Debbah, M.-S. Alouini, C. Y uen , J. De Rosny, and S. Tretyakov, “Smart radio environments emp owered by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: How it works, state of research, and the road ahead,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2450...

    2020

  3. [10]

    Uplink performan ce of RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO system with electromag netic interference,

    E. Shi, J. Zhang, D. W. K. Ng, and B. Ai, “Uplink performan ce of RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO system with electromag netic interference,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 2431– 2445, Aug. 2023

    2023

  4. [11]

    Cooperat ive beamforming for RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO networks ,

    X. Ma, D. Zhang, M. Xiao, C. Huang, and Z. Chen, “Cooperat ive beamforming for RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO networks ,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 7243–7258, Nov. 2023

    2023

  5. [12]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for energy ef ficiency in wireless communication,

    C. Huang, A. Zappone, G. C. Alexandropoulos, M. Debbah, and C. Y uen, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for energy ef ficiency in wireless communication,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 4157–4170, Aug. 2019

    2019

  6. [13]

    Energy efficiency and spectral efficiency tradeoff in RIS-aided mul tiuser MIMO uplink transmission,

    L. Y ou, J. Xiong, D. W. K. Ng, C. Y uen, W. Wang, and X. Gao, “ Energy efficiency and spectral efficiency tradeoff in RIS-aided mul tiuser MIMO uplink transmission,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 69, pp. 1407– 1421, 2020

    2020

  7. [14]

    Energy e fficiency maximization in RIS-aided cell-free network with limited b ackhaul,

    Q. N. Le, V .-D. Nguyen, O. A. Dobre, and R. Zhao, “Energy e fficiency maximization in RIS-aided cell-free network with limited b ackhaul,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1974–1978, Jun. 2021

    1974

  8. [15]

    Energy efficie ncy optimization in RIS-aided wireless networks: Active versu s nearly- passive RIS with global reflection constraints,

    R. K. Fotock, A. Zappone, and M. Di Renzo, “Energy efficie ncy optimization in RIS-aided wireless networks: Active versu s nearly- passive RIS with global reflection constraints,” IEEE Trans. Commun., early access , 2023

    2023

  9. [16]

    Low-complexity chann el estimation and passive beamforming for RIS-assisted MIMO s ystems relying on discrete phase shifts,

    J. An, C. Xu, L. Gan, and L. Hanzo, “Low-complexity chann el estimation and passive beamforming for RIS-assisted MIMO s ystems relying on discrete phase shifts,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 1245–1260, Feb. 2021

    2021

  10. [17]

    Reconfigura ble intelligent surfaces: Performance assessment through a sy stem-level simulator,

    B. Sihlbom, M. I. Poulakis, and M. Di Renzo, “Reconfigura ble intelligent surfaces: Performance assessment through a sy stem-level simulator,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 98–106, Apr. 2022

    2022

  11. [18]

    On the opti mal number of reflecting elements for reconfigurable intelligen t surfaces,

    A. Zappone, M. Di Renzo, X. Xi, and M. Debbah, “On the opti mal number of reflecting elements for reconfigurable intelligen t surfaces,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 464–468, Mar. 2021

    2021

  12. [19]

    All-optical machine learning using diffractive deep neural networks,

    X. Lin, Y . Rivenson, N. T. Y ardimci, M. V eli, Y . Luo, M. Ja rrahi, and A. Ozcan, “All-optical machine learning using diffractive deep neural networks,” Sci., vol. 361, no. 6406, pp. 1004–1008, Jul. 2018

    2018

  13. [20]

    A programmable diffractive deep 14 neural network based on a digital-coding metasurface array ,

    C. Liu, Q. Ma, Z. J. Luo, Q. R. Hong, Q. Xiao, H. C. Zhang, L. Miao, W. M. Y u, Q. Cheng, L. Li et al. , “A programmable diffractive deep 14 neural network based on a digital-coding metasurface array ,” Nat. Electro., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 113–122, Feb. 2022

    2022

  14. [21]

    Physically consistent model ing of stacked intelligent metasurfaces implemented with beyond diagona l ris,

    M. Nerini and B. Clerckx, “Physically consistent model ing of stacked intelligent metasurfaces implemented with beyond diagona l ris,” IEEE Commun. Lett., early access , 2024

    2024

  15. [22]

    Stacked intelligent metasurface s for wireless sensing and communication: Applications and chal lenges,

    H. Liu, J. An, X. Jia, S. Lin, X. Y ao, L. Gan, B. Clerckx, C. Y uen, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, “Stacked intelligent metasurface s for wireless sensing and communication: Applications and chal lenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.03566 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for efficie nt holo- graphic MIMO communications in 6G,

    J. An, C. Xu, D. W. K. Ng, G. C. Alexandropoulos, C. Huang, C. Y uen, and L. Hanzo, “Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for efficie nt holo- graphic MIMO communications in 6G,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 2380–2396, Aug. 2023

    2023

  17. [24]

    Performance of double-stacked in telligent metasurface-assisted multiuser massive MIMO communicati ons in the wave domain,

    A. Papazafeiropoulos, P . Kourtessis, S. Chatzinotas, D. I. Kakla- mani, and I. S. V enieris, “Performance of double-stacked in telligent metasurface-assisted multiuser massive MIMO communicati ons in the wave domain,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., early access , 2025

    2025

  18. [25]

    Hybrid digital -wave domain channel estimator for stacked intelligent metasurface ena bled multi-user MISO systems,

    Q.-U.-A. Nadeem, J. An, and A. Chaaban, “Hybrid digital -wave domain channel estimator for stacked intelligent metasurface ena bled multi-user MISO systems,” arXiv:2309.16204, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  19. [26]

    A survey on hybrid beamforming techniques i n 5G: Architecture and system model perspectives,

    I. Ahmed, H. Khammari, A. Shahid, A. Musa, K. S. Kim, E. De Poorter, and I. Moerman, “A survey on hybrid beamforming techniques i n 5G: Architecture and system model perspectives,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 3060–3097, 2018

    2018

  20. [27]

    Machi ne learning based beam selection with low complexity hybrid be amforming design for 5G massive MIMO systems,

    I. Ahmed, M. K. Shahid, H. Khammari, and M. Masud, “Machi ne learning based beam selection with low complexity hybrid be amforming design for 5G massive MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Networking, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 2160–2173, 2021

    2021

  21. [28]

    S tacked intelligent metasurface-based transceiver design for nea r-field wideband systems,

    Q. Li, M. El-Hajjar, C. Xu, J. An, C. Y uen, and L. Hanzo, “S tacked intelligent metasurface-based transceiver design for nea r-field wideband systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., early access , 2025

    2025

  22. [29]

    Multi-user ISAC through stacked intelligent metasur- faces: New algorithms and experiments,

    Z. Wang, H. Liu, J. Zhang, R. Xiong, K. Wan, X. Qian, M. Di R enzo, and R. C. Qiu, “Multi-user ISAC through stacked intelligent metasur- faces: New algorithms and experiments,” arXiv:2405.01104, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Two-dimensional direction-of-arrival esti mation using stacked intelligent metasurfaces,

    J. An, C. Y uen, Y . L. Guan, M. Di Renzo, M. Debbah, H. V . Poo r, and L. Hanzo, “Two-dimensional direction-of-arrival esti mation using stacked intelligent metasurfaces,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., early access, 2024

    2024

  24. [31]

    On the efficie nt design of stacked intelligent metasurfaces for secure SISO transm ission,

    H. Niu, X. Lei, J. An, L. Zhang, and C. Y uen, “On the efficie nt design of stacked intelligent metasurfaces for secure SISO transm ission,” IEEE Trans. Inf. F orensics Secur ., early access, 2024

    2024

  25. [32]

    S tacked in- telligent metasurfaces for holographic MIMO aided cell-fr ee networks,

    Q. Li, M. El-Hajjar, C. Xu, J. An, C. Y uen, and L. Hanzo, “S tacked in- telligent metasurfaces for holographic MIMO aided cell-fr ee networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun., early access , 2024

    2024

  26. [33]

    Achievable rate optimization for stacked intelli- gent metasurface-assisted holographic MIMO communicatio ns,

    A. Papazafeiropoulos, J. An, P . Kourtessis, T. Ratnara jah, and S. Chatzinotas, “Achievable rate optimization for stacked intelli- gent metasurface-assisted holographic MIMO communicatio ns,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., early access , 2024

    2024

  27. [34]

    Uplink per- formance of stacked intelligent metasurface-enhanced cel l-free massive MIMO systems,

    E. Shi, J. Zhang, Y . Zhu, J. An, C. Y uen, and B. Ai, “Uplink per- formance of stacked intelligent metasurface-enhanced cel l-free massive MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., early access , 2025

    2025

  28. [35]

    Joint ap-ue association and precoding for sim-aided cell- free massive mimo systems,

    E. Shi, J. Zhang, J. An, Z. Guangyang, L. Ziheng, C. Y uen, and B. Ai, “Joint ap-ue association and precoding for sim-aided cell- free massive mimo systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., early access , 2025

    2025

  29. [36]

    Scalin g achievable rates in SIM-aided MIMO systems with metasurface layers: A h ybrid optimization framework,

    E. E. Bahingayi, N. S. Perovi´ c, and L.-N. Tran, “Scalin g achievable rates in SIM-aided MIMO systems with metasurface layers: A h ybrid optimization framework,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02555 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Achievable rate optimization for large stacked intel- ligent metasurfaces based on statistical CSI,

    A. Papazafeiropoulos, P . Kourtessis, S. Chatzinotas, D. I. Kaklamani, and I. S. V enieris, “Achievable rate optimization for large stacked intel- ligent metasurfaces based on statistical CSI,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 2337–2341, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    Sta cked intelligent metasurfaces for multiuser downlink beamform ing in the wave domain,

    J. An, M. Di Renzo, M. Debbah, H. V . Poor, and C. Y uen, “Sta cked intelligent metasurfaces for multiuser downlink beamform ing in the wave domain,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., early access , 2025

    2025

  32. [40]

    Stacked int elligent metasurface enabled LEO satellite communications relying on statistical CSI,

    S. Lin, J. An, L. Gan, M. Debbah, and C. Y uen, “Stacked int elligent metasurface enabled LEO satellite communications relying on statistical CSI,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., early access , 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Holographic MIMO communications with arbitrary surface p lace- ments: Near-field LoS channel model and capacity limit,

    T. Gong, L. Wei, C. Huang, Z. Y ang, J. He, M. Debbah, and C. Y uen, “Holographic MIMO communications with arbitrary surface p lace- ments: Near-field LoS channel model and capacity limit,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., early access , 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    Rayleigh fading mode ling and chan- nel hardening for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    E. Bj¨ ornson and L. Sanguinetti, “Rayleigh fading mode ling and chan- nel hardening for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 830–834, Apr. 2020

    2020

  35. [43]

    Channel customiza tion for joint Tx-RISs-Rx design in hybrid mmwave systems,

    W. Chen, C.-K. Wen, X. Li, and S. Jin, “Channel customiza tion for joint Tx-RISs-Rx design in hybrid mmwave systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 8304–8319, Nov. 2023

    2023

  36. [44]

    E nergy- efficient design in STAR-RIS assisted communication system with antenna selection,

    G. Zhang, Y . Lu, B. Ai, Z. Zhong, Z. Ding, and T. Q. Quek, “E nergy- efficient design in STAR-RIS assisted communication system with antenna selection,” in GLOBECOM 2023-2023 IEEE Global Commu- nications Conference. IEEE, 2023, pp. 637–642

    2023

  37. [45]

    Energy-efficient multicell multigroup multica sting with joint beamforming and antenna selection,

    O. Tervo, L.-N. Tran, H. Pennanen, S. Chatzinotas, B. Ot tersten, and M. Juntti, “Energy-efficient multicell multigroup multica sting with joint beamforming and antenna selection,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 66, no. 18, pp. 4904–4919, 2018

    2018

  38. [46]

    Fractional programming for communic ation systems—part i: Power control and beamforming,

    K. Shen and W. Y u, “Fractional programming for communic ation systems—part i: Power control and beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 2616–2630, Oct. 2018

    2018

  39. [47]

    An iterativ ely weighted MMSE approach to distributed sum-utility maximization for a MIMO interfering broadcast channel,

    Q. Shi, M. Razaviyayn, Z.-Q. Luo, and C. He, “An iterativ ely weighted MMSE approach to distributed sum-utility maximization for a MIMO interfering broadcast channel,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 4331–4340, Sep. 2011

    2011

  40. [48]

    Antenna selection in MIM O systems,

    S. Sanayei and A. Nosratinia, “Antenna selection in MIM O systems,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 68–73, Oct. 2004

    2004

  41. [49]

    Joint precoding and AP selection for energy effici ent RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO using multi-agent reinfo rcement learning,

    E. Shi, J. Zhang, Z. Liu, Y . Zhu, C. Y uen, D. W. K. Ng, M. Di R enzo, and B. Ai, “Joint precoding and AP selection for energy effici ent RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO using multi-agent reinfo rcement learning,” arXiv:2411.11070, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Semidefinite programming ,

    L. V andenberghe and S. Boyd, “Semidefinite programming ,” SIAM review, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 49–95, Jan. 1996

    1996

  43. [51]

    Exploiti ng intelligent reflecting surfaces in NOMA networks: Joint beamforming opt imiza- tion,

    X. Mu, Y . Liu, L. Guo, J. Lin, and N. Al-Dhahir, “Exploiti ng intelligent reflecting surfaces in NOMA networks: Joint beamforming opt imiza- tion,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 6884–6898, Oct. 2020

    2020

  44. [52]

    Intelligent reflecting surface-assisted MU-MISO systems with imperfect hardware: Channel estimation and beamforming de sign,

    A. Papazafeiropoulos, C. Pan, P . Kourtessis, S. Chatzi notas, and J. M. Senior, “Intelligent reflecting surface-assisted MU-MISO systems with imperfect hardware: Channel estimation and beamforming de sign,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 2077–2092, Mar. 2021

    2021

  45. [53]

    Minimization of functions having lipschit z continuous first partial derivatives,

    L. Armijo, “Minimization of functions having lipschit z continuous first partial derivatives,” Pac. J. Math. , vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–3, Jan 1966

    1966

  46. [54]

    Wideband millimeter-wave propagation measurements and c hannel models for future wireless communication system design,

    T. S. Rappaport, G. R. MacCartney, M. K. Samimi, and S. Su n, “Wideband millimeter-wave propagation measurements and c hannel models for future wireless communication system design,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 3029–3056, Sep. 2015

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.