Correlated interaction effects in an anisotropic flat band fermion system

Chang-Jin Zhang; Jing-Rong Wang

REVIEW 5 major objections 3 minor 96 references

Correlated interaction effects in an anisotropic flat band fermion system

T0 review · 5 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that Coulomb interaction restores the lost linear velocity in an anisotropic flat band and can drive the system into an excitonic Chern insulator with quantized anomalous Hall conductivity.

desk verdict The velocity restoration claim contradicts the paper's own RG equation; the prediction is interesting but the derivation is not yet self-consistent. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.13980 v1 pith:OTQAAMT4 submitted 2024-12-18 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall

Jing-Rong Wang , Chang-Jin Zhang This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hall

keywords anisotropicflatbandCoulombinteractionrenormalizationgroupDyson-SchwingerequationexcitonicCherninsulatorquantumanomalousHalleffectlinear-cubicdispersion

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what long-range Coulomb repulsion does to a two-dimensional band whose dispersion is linear along one axis and cubic along the other. The answer it defends is that the interaction restores the missing linear velocity along the cubic direction, so at low energies the system looks like an ordinary 2D Dirac semimetal with Coulomb interactions. At stronger coupling the same system develops an excitonic gap and becomes a topological insulator with a quantized anomalous Hall response, even though the starting Hamiltonian has no external magnetic field. If this is right, an anisotropic flat band is not just a place where kinetic energy dies; it is a tunable platform for correlated Dirac physics and a Chern insulating state.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the dynamically generated linear term $\Sigma_L k_y\sigma_2$ in the one-loop self-energy, which is what converts the cubic $y$-dispersion into a linear one, and the massive Dirac Hamiltonian $H_\Delta=v_x k_x\sigma_1+d_y k_y^3\sigma_2+\Delta\sigma_3$. The pairing of these two mechanisms is expressed by the vector $\mathbf{D}=v_x k_x\mathbf{e}_x+d_y k_y^3\mathbf{e}_y+\Delta\mathbf{e}_z$, whose normalized version $\hat{\mathbf{D}}$ enters the Chern number $C=\frac{1}{4\pi}\int d^2k\,(\partial_{k_x}\hat{\mathbf{D}}\times\partial_{k_y}\hat{\mathbf{D}})\cdot\hat{\mathbf{D}}$; this integral gives $C=\frac12\operatorname{sgn}(v_x d_y \Delta)$, the topological invariant that makes the strong-coupling phase an anomalous Hall insulator.

What would settle it

Compute the one-loop coefficient $\Sigma_L$ of the linear $k_y$ term in the self-energy at bare $v_y=0$ using an exact lattice regularization or a numerical quantum Monte Carlo simulation; if $\Sigma_L=0$ or if the renormalization-group flow of $v_y$ has no source at $v_y=0$, the velocity-restoration mechanism and the Dirac fixed point that underpins the topological gap scenario do not survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that long-range Coulomb interaction qualitatively changes the low-energy physics of a two-dimensional fermion system with dispersion $E=\pm\sqrt{v_x^2 k_x^2+d_y^2 k_y^6}$. Through a one-loop renormalization-group calculation the authors find that the self-energy contains a dynamically generated term linear in $k_y$, so the cubic direction acquires a finite velocity $v_y$ and the system flows to the same fixed point as a 2D Dirac fermion with Coulomb interaction, with $v_y/v_x\to 1$ and the effective Coulomb coupling flowing logarithmically to zero. When the Coulomb strength exceeds a critical value, a self-consistent Dyson-Schwinger equation develops an excitonic gap $\Delta$ that grows as the coupling increases, and the gapped phase is described by the Hamiltonian $H_\Delta=v_x k_x\sigma_1+d_y k_y^3\sigma_2+\Delta\sigma_3$. The paper evaluates the Berry curvature integral for this Hamiltonian and obtains $C=\frac{1}{2}\operatorname{sgn}(v_x d_y \Delta)$, giving a quantized anomalous Hall conductivity $\sigma_{xy}=C e^2/h$; it calls the resulting state a novel excitonic Chern insulator.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Coulomb self-energy produces a nonzero term linear in $k_y$ even when the band is exactly flat along $y$; only such a source term can make $v_y$ grow from zero, since the multiplicative flow for $v_y$ vanishes at $v_y=0$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Under weak Coulomb interaction the density of states, specific heat, compressibility, diamagnetic susceptibility, and optical conductivities take the same logarithmic forms as for 2D Dirac fermions, so transport and thermodynamic measurements can test the velocity restoration indirectly.
For strong enough Coulomb interaction the Dyson-Schwinger equation yields a finite excitonic gap, and the gapped phase shows activated specific heat and compressibility and an optical threshold near twice the gap.
The gapped phase carries Chern number $\frac{1}{2}\operatorname{sgn}(v_x d_y \Delta)$, giving quantized anomalous Hall conductivity $\sigma_{xy}=C e^2/h$; the sign is set by the product of the model parameters and the gap.
A sufficiently strong short-range four-fermion interaction $g_3(\psi^\dagger\sigma_3\psi)^2$ can also open an excitonic gap with $\Delta\propto(g_3-g_{3c})^3$, so the same insulating order can be reached through a purely short-range route.
Because the Coulomb coupling flows to zero while velocities grow, the low-energy fixed point is that of weakly interacting 2D Dirac fermions, the same qualitative regime as graphene.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the linear-cubic model represents one valley of a time-reversal-symmetric lattice, the other valley contributes an opposite or equal Chern number depending on the sign of its mass; the single-cone half-integer result means the net anomalous Hall response in a lattice will be either zero or integer, so the half-quantization is a property of the isolated cone rather than the final lattice Hall co
The same one-loop mechanism that generates $v_y$ from the cubic term should be checked for other anisotropic band touchings, such as semi-Dirac systems with a quadratic direction, where it would imply that Coulomb interactions generically push such bands toward a fully linear Dirac fixed point.
Because screening from the polarization function suppresses the excitonic gap, changing the dielectric environment around the sample should move the critical Coulomb strength; a high-permittivity substrate would suppress the gap while a suspended sample would favor it, giving a controlled test of the gap-equation prediction.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take on arXiv:2412.13980. The interesting idea is that Coulomb interaction in a linear-cubic anisotropic flat band could restore the linear dispersion along the cubic direction, turning the system into an effective 2D Dirac gas, and that a sufficiently strong interaction then opens an excitonic gap with Chern number ±1/2. That would be a nice result, and the basic scenario is worth taking seriously.

The paper does a few things well. It is the first RG and Dyson-Schwinger treatment of the Sheffer-Queiroz-Stern model. The Chern number computation for the gapped cubic Hamiltonian is clean and correct. The catalog of observable quantities in the free, weak-coupling, and gapped regimes is useful and clearly organized.

The soft spots, however, hit the two central claims. The RG flow for v_y is Eq. (16), d v_y/dℓ = C2^a v_y. This has v_y=0 as an exact fixed point. The text and Fig. 2(b) nevertheless claim v_y grows from zero. The only candidate source term is the linear-k_y self-energy Σ_L in Eq. (11), but it is computed with the bare cubic propagator and never inserted into the beta function. When the RG is done with G_new_0 and bare v_y=0, the linear k_y term is absent at v_y=0. So the restoration claim is not derived; it is read into the flow. This is an internal contradiction, not just a disagreement with the literature.

The gap equation (25) compounds the problem: it is solved with the bare cubic dispersion, not the restored Dirac dispersion that the RG narrative says is the correct low-energy theory. The dressed interaction in Eq. (18) uses an exponential interpolation between the cubic and Dirac polarizations with no derivation, and the symmetry-allowed k_x^2 k_y term from Ref. [60] is dropped with a bare assertion that it does not change the conclusions. Each of these is fixable, but together they mean the paper's two headlines are not currently supported by its own calculations.

Who is this for? Researchers working on correlated flat bands and topological semimetals. I would not cite it in its present form, and if I assigned it to a referee I would expect major revision. A serious rewrite should derive the v_y source term (or drop the restoration claim), recompute the gap with the correct dispersion, and justify the dressed interaction. The raw ingredients are there, but the derivation is not yet self-consistent.

Referee Report

5 major / 3 minor

Summary. This manuscript studies a two-dimensional two-band model with Hamiltonian H_f = v_x k_x σ_1 + d_y k_y^3 σ_2 and Coulomb interaction. Using a one-loop momentum-shell renormalization group, the authors claim that a linear velocity v_y is dynamically generated along the originally cubic direction, so that the low-energy theory becomes equivalent to 2D Dirac fermions with Coulomb interaction. Using a Dyson-Schwinger gap equation, they further claim that for sufficiently strong coupling an excitonic gap opens and the system becomes a Chern insulator with σ_xy = C e^2/h and C = 1/2. The paper also lists observable quantities for the free, weakly interacting, and gapped regimes.

Significance. If the central claims were correct, the paper would identify an interesting interaction-induced velocity restoration and a possible excitonic Chern insulator in an anisotropic flat-band semimetal, with explicit falsifiable predictions in Eqs. (28)–(30). The Chern number calculation and the compilation of observable formulas are clear and useful. However, the main velocity-restoration result is internally inconsistent with the paper's own RG equation, and several subsequent steps rely on unproven modeling assumptions. The significance is therefore contingent on a substantial re-derivation rather than on local corrections.

major comments (5)

[Restoring of fermion velocity, Eqs. (11), (14), (16)] Eq. (16), dv_y/dℓ = C2^a v_y, has v_y = 0 as an exact fixed point, so the stated growth of v_y from zero in Fig. 2(b) and Fig. 2(f) does not follow from the RG equations written in the paper. The linear-in-k_y term Σ_L in Eq. (11), obtained with the bare cubic propagator, is the only candidate source, but it is not inserted into Eq. (16). When the calculation is repeated with Gnew_0 at v_y = 0, Eq. (14) contains no linear k_y σ_2 term. Unless C2^a is singular as δ → 0, which is not shown, the claimed velocity restoration is not derived; this undermines the weak-coupling equivalence to 2D Dirac fermions and the predictions in Eq. (29).
[Restoring of fermion velocity, Eqs. (18)–(21)] The dressed Coulomb interaction V⋆(Ω, q) in Eq. (18) is constructed by adding the anisotropic polarization Π and the Dirac polarization Π_Dirac with exponential weights F1 and F2 given in Eqs. (20)–(21). No derivation is given for this interpolation, and the Dirac polarization is thereby fed into the low-energy theory by hand. The dressed-case RG flows in Figs. 2(e)–(h) therefore cannot be viewed as an independent confirmation of Dirac-like low-energy behavior, and the same v_y = 0 fixed-point problem persists because Eqs. (22)–(23) remain proportional to v_y.
[Generation of excitonic gap, Eqs. (25), (31)–(33)] The gap equation Eq. (25) is solved with the bare cubic dispersion sqrt(v_x^2 k_x^2 + d_y^2 k_y^6) and the bare Coulomb interaction V0, omitting both the restored linear v_y k_y term and the dressed interaction V⋆ that are central to the earlier RG narrative. The Hamiltonian used for the Chern number, Eqs. (31)–(33), likewise uses D_y = d_y k_y^3 without any restored v_y. As a result, the strong-coupling phase is computed from a different low-energy theory than the one whose restoration was claimed, and the gapped-phase observables in Eq. (30) are not connected to the RG picture.
[Observable quantities, Eq. (35)] Eq. (35) gives C = (1/2) sgn(v_x) sgn(d_y) sgn(Δ) from an integral over an unbounded continuum. For a single two-dimensional Dirac-like node, the half-integer skyrmion number is the standard continuum result, but it does not by itself establish a quantized anomalous Hall conductivity in a periodic system; one needs a lattice regularization or an enumeration of all nodes. The paper's claim of a 'novel excitonic Chern insulator with quantized anomalous Hall conductivity' (abstract and Eqs. (35)–(36)) therefore requires additional justification.
[Discussion, final paragraph on k_x^2 k_y term] The Discussion asserts that the k_x^2 k_y term from Ref. [60] can be neglected and that 'our conclusions will be not changed qualitatively,' but no analysis is given. This term changes the low-energy dispersion and could affect both the RG flows and the Chern number; because the model is motivated by Ref. [60], the robustness claim needs a concrete calculation or symmetry argument.

minor comments (3)

[Supplementary Material, Eq. (14)] The definitions of all nontrivial RG coefficients (C1, C2^a, C2^b, C⋆_0, C⋆_1, C⋆_2) are relegated to the Supplemental Material [83], which is not included in the submitted text; without these expressions the beta functions cannot be checked.
[Throughout] There are typos and minor errors: 'renormalizaton' in the abstract, 'four-four interaction' in the Discussion, and 'sates' instead of 'states'; the caption of Fig. 2 refers to panels (e)–(f) although panels (e)–(h) are discussed.
[Discussion, four-fermion interaction paragraph] The paragraph on the four-fermion interaction g3 states without derivation that Δ ∝ (g3 − g3c)^3; this new result should either be derived or removed.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The claimed restoration of the cubic-direction velocity is an input of the ansatz, not an output of the RG: Eq. (16) has v_y=0 as a fixed point, and the Dirac-like low-energy behavior is partly built into the dressed interaction.

other [Section "Restoring of fermion velocity", Eqs. (11), (12), (14), (16), and Fig. 2(b).]
"We notice that linear term of ky is always generated dynamically. Accordingly, the fermion velocity along y axis is restored. ... In order to consider this dynamically generated term in RG analysis, we employ the fermion propagator as following Gnew0 ... dvy/dℓ = Ca2vy ... vy(ℓ) grows from zero and also increases nearly linearly with increasing of ℓ."

The only possible source for a restored velocity is the linear-ky term ΣL in Eq. (11), which is computed with the bare cubic propagator. In the RG, however, the self-energy (14) is evaluated with Gnew0 and contains only terms proportional to vxkx, vyky, and dyk_y^3; no source term is carried into the flow. Equation (16), dvy/dℓ = C2^a vy, is multiplicative and has v_y=0 as an exact fixed point. With the stated bare value v_y=0, the flow cannot generate a finite v_y. The plotted "grows from zero" is therefore an ansatz inserted through Gnew0, not a consequence of the RG equations.
other [Eqs. (18)-(21), Section "Restoring of fermion velocity".]
"we employ the dressed Coulomb interaction as following V⋆(Ω,q) = 1/(V0^{-1}(|q|)+F1Π(Ω,q)+F2ΠDirac(Ω,q)), where Π(Ω,q) is given by (8), and ΠDirac(Ω,q) = ... F1 = e^{-vy/(dyΛ^2)}, F2 = e^{-dyΛ^2/vy}."

The low-energy similarity to 2D Dirac fermions is partly built into the interaction from the outset: ΠDirac is the standard 2D Dirac polarization [2], added with an ad hoc weight F2 that becomes of order one once v_y is nonzero. Because the flow of v_y (Eq. (23)) is again multiplicative, the only route to a nonzero v_y is the same unproven "growth from zero" identified above. Once v_y is assumed nonzero, F2 switches on the Dirac polarization, and the RG flows are then declared qualitatively Dirac-like. Thus the conclusion that the system "takes the qualitatively same behaviors as the 2D Dirac fermion system with Coulomb interaction" follows from the authors' chosen interpolation, not from the original cubic dispersion.

full rationale

The paper's central RG claim—that Coulomb interaction always restores the linear dispersion along the cubic direction—is not a consequence of the paper's own equations. Equation (16) is homogeneous in v_y, so v_y=0 is an exact fixed point; starting from the stated bare value v_y=0, the flow can never leave zero unless a source term is present, and no such term appears in the self-energy (14) or in the flow equations. The linear-ky term ΣL of Eq. (11) is computed with the bare propagator but is not used to seed the RG flow. Consequently, the "restoration" is an input of the ansatz Gnew0 and of the dressed interaction (18), which already includes the 2D Dirac polarization ΠDirac with an ad hoc weight F2. This is a construction-level circularity for the velocity-restoration and Dirac-equivalence predictions, including the weak-coupling observable formulas (29), which are imported from graphene by analogy. The remaining central results—the excitonic gap from the Dyson-Schwinger equation (25) and the Chern number (34)-(35)—are independent self-contained calculations performed on the original linear-cubic model and do not rely on the restoration claim; they are not circular. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem; the issue is internal to the derivation. Verdict: partial circularity, score 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced; the 'excitonic Chern insulator' is a phase label, not a new entity. The central claims rest on the imported model of Ref. [60], an approximate polarization formula, a one-loop RG with an unstated source term for vy, an ad hoc dressed interaction, and a gap equation that omits the restored linear velocity. No parameters are fitted to experimental data.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The starting Hamiltonian Eq. (2), Hf = vx kx σ1 + dy ky^3 σ2, captures the low-energy physics of the flat band system from Ref. [60], and the k_x^2 k_y σ2 term can be neglected.
The model is imported from PRX 13, 021012 (2023); the neglected term is acknowledged in the Discussion with the assertion that conclusions are unchanged, but no supporting calculation is given.
domain assumption The polarization function Π(Ω,q) has the approximate closed form in Eq. (8) with exponents 5/6 and 1/6.
The expression is stated as from Ref. [83] (supplemental material) and is used for both RG and gap calculations; the approximation's validity for the full momentum range is not shown in the main text.
standard math A one-loop self-energy calculation justifies expanding the self-energy to leading order in kx and ky, and the resulting beta functions (Eqs. (15)-(17)) capture the flow.
This is the standard momentum-shell RG used for interacting fermions, following Ref. [61]; the specific coefficients are deferred to the supplementary material.
ad hoc to paper The dressed Coulomb interaction in Eq. (18) is formed by adding the anisotropic polarization Π and the Dirac polarization Π_Dirac with exponential weights F1 and F2.
The weights e^{-vy/(dy Λ^2)} and e^{-dy Λ^2/vy} are not derived; they are chosen to interpolate between the two limits, and the Dirac behavior is partly imposed by construction.
ad hoc to paper The gap equation Eq. (25) can be solved with the bare cubic dispersion and without the frequency dependence or the restored linear velocity vy.
The denominator contains vx^2 kx^2 + dy^2 ky^6 + Δ^2 but no vy ky term, even though the RG section concludes vy is restored at low energy; this inconsistency affects the critical coupling and gap magnitude.
standard math The standard Chern number formula for a two-band massive Hamiltonian applies to the gapped state.
The Chern number integral Eq. (34) is standard for the massive Dirac-like Hamiltonian Eq. (31).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Correlated interaction effects in an anisotropic flat band fermion system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OTQAAMT4

@misc{pith2026241213980,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Correlated interaction effects in an anisotropic flat band fermion system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OTQAAMT4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.13980}
}

read the original abstract

An anisotropic flat band fermion system with a novel dispersion that is linear along one direction and cubic along another is proposed in Phys. Rev. X. 13, 021012 (2023). We study the effects of Coulomb interaction in this fermion system by renormalization group theory and Dyson-Schwinger gap equation. We perform renormalizaton group analysis and find that fermion velocity is always restored along the direction that the fermions take cubic dispersion originally. Accordingly, the system takes the similar behaviors to the two-dimensional Dirac fermion system with Coulomb interaction in the low energy regime. Based on Dyson-Schwinger gap equation method, we find that an excitonic gap is generated if the Coulomb strength is large enough, and the system becomes a novel excitonic Chern insulator with quantized anomalous Hall conductivity. Observable quantities of this system in free case, under weak and strong enough Coulomb interaction are all analyzed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.13980 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2: Flows of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3: (a) and (b) ∆(0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

[60]

Sheﬀer, R

Y. Sheﬀer, R. Queiroz, and A. Stern, Symmetries as the guiding principle for ﬂattening bands of Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021012 (2023)

work page 2023
[1]

A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009)

2009
[2]

V. N. Kotov, B. Uchoa, V. M. Pereira, F. Guinea, and A. H. Castro Neto, Electron-electron interactions in graphene: Current status and perspectives, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1067 (2012)

2012
[3]

Vafek and A

O. Vafek and A. Vishwanath, Dirac fermions in solids: From high-Tc cuprates and graphene to topological insu- lators and Weyl semimetals, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 5, 83 (2014)

2014
[4]

T. O. Wehling, A. M. Black-Schaﬀer, and A. V. Balatsky, Dirac materials, Adv. Phys. 63, 1 (2014)

2014
[5]

M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

2010
[6]

Qi and S.-C

X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

2011
[7]

N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018)

2018

Show all 96 references

[8]

B. Q. Lv, T. Qian, and H. Ding, Experimental perspec- tive on three-dimensional topological semimetals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025002 (2021)

2021
[9]

M. Z. Hasan, G. Chang, I. Belopolski, G. Bian, S.-Y. Xu, J.-X. Yin, Weyl, Dirac and high-fold chiral fermions in topological quantum matter, Nat. Rev. Mat. 6, 784 (2021)

2021
[10]

I. F. Herbut, Interactions and phase transitions on graphene’s honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 146401 (2006)

2006
[11]

I. F. Herbut, V. Juriˇ ci´ c, and B. Roy, Theory of interacting electrons on the honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 79, 085116 (2009)

2009
[12]

Gonz´ alez, F

J. Gonz´ alez, F. Guinea, and M. A. H. Vozmediano, Non- Fermi liquid behavior of electrons in the half-ﬁlled honey- comb lattice (A renormalization group approach), Nucl. Phys. B 424, 596 (1994)

1994
[13]

Hofmann, E

J. Hofmann, E. Barnes, and S. Das Sarma, Why does graphene behave as a weakly interacting system?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 105502 (2014)

2014
[14]

Stauber, P

T. Stauber, P. Parida, M. Trushin, M. V. Ulybyshev, D. L. Boyda, and J. Schliemann, Interacting electrons in graphene: Fermi velocity renormalization and optical response, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 266801 (2017)

2017
[15]

D. C. Elias, R. V. Gorbachev, A. S. Mayorov, S. V. Mo- rozov, A. A. Zhukov, P. Blake, L. A. Ponomarenko, I. V. Grigorieva, K. S. Novoselov, F. Guinea, and A. K. Geim, Dirac cones reshaped by interaction eﬀects in suspended graphene, Nat. Phys. 7, 701 (2011)

2011
[16]

D. A. Siegel, C.-H. Park, C. Hwang, J. Deslippe, A. V. Fedorov, S. G. Louie, and A. Lanzara, Many-body inter- actions in quasifreestanding graphene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 11365 (2011)

2011
[17]

G. L. Yu, R. Jalil, B. Belle, A. S. Mayorov, P. Blake, F. Schedin, S. V. Morozov, L. A. Ponomarenko, F. Chiap- pini, S. Wiedmann, U. Zeitler, M. I. Katsnelson, A. K. Geim, K. S. Novoselov, and D. C. Elias, Interaction phe- nomena in graphene seen through quantum capacitance, P...

2013
[18]

L. Miao, Z. F. Wang, W. Ming, M.-Y. Yao, M. Wang, F. Yang, Y. R. Song, F. Zhu, A. V. Fedorov, Z. Sun, C. L. Gao, C. Liu, Q.-X. Xue, C.-X. Liu, F. Liu, D. Qian, and J.-F. Jia, Quasiparticle dynamics in reshaped helical Dirac cone of topological insulators, Proc. Natl. Acad, Sci...

2013
[19]

Bistritzer and A

R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moir´ e bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 6 U.S.A. 108, 12233 (2011)

2011
[20]

Tarnopolsky, A

G. Tarnopolsky, A. J. Kruchkov, and A. Vishwanath, Origin of magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 106405 (2019)

2019
[21]

J. Cano, S. Fang, J. H. Pixley, and J. H. Wilson, Moir´ e superlattice on the surface of a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B 103, 155157 (2021)

2021
[22]

T. Wang, N. F. Yuan, and L. Fu, Moir´ e surface states and enhanced superconductivity in topological insula- tors, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021024 (2021)

2021
[23]

E. Y. Andrei and A. H. MacDondald, Graphene bilayers with a twist, Nat. Mat. 19, 1265 (2020)

2020
[24]

Balents, C

L. Balents, C. R. Dean, D. K. Efetov, and A. F. Young, Superconductivity and strong correlations in moir´ e ﬂat bands, Nat. Phys. 16, 725 (2020)

2020
[25]

S. Carr, S. Fang, and E. Kaxiras, Electronic-structure methods for twisted moir´ e layers, Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 748 (2020)

2020
[26]

C. N. Lau, M. W. Bockrath, K. F. Mak, and F. Zhang, Reproducibility in the fabrication and physics of moir´ e materials, Nature 602, 41 (2022)

2022
[27]

K. F. Mak and J. Shan, Semiconductor moir´ e materials, Nat. Nano. 17, 686 (2022)

2022
[28]

T¨ orm¨ a, S

P. T¨ orm¨ a, S. Peotta, and B. A. Bernevig, Superconduc- tivity, superﬂuidity and quantum geometry in twisted multilayer systems, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 528 (2022)

2022
[29]

K. P. Nuckolls and A. Yazdani, A microscopic perspectiv e on moir´ e materials, Nat. Rev. Mater. 9, 460 (2024)

2024
[30]

P. A. Pantale´ on, A. Jimeno-Pozo, H´ ector Sainz-Cruz,V. T. Phong, T. Cea, and F. Guinea, Superconductivity and correlated phases in non-twisted bilayer and trilayer graphene, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 304 (2023)

2023
[31]

McCann and M

E. McCann and M. Koshino, The electronic properties of bilayer graphene, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 056503 (2013)

2013
[32]

Min and A

H. Min and A. H. MacDonald, Electronic structure of multilayer graphene, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 176, 227 (2008)

2008
[33]

Koshino and E

M. Koshino and E. McCann, Trigonal warping and Berry’s phase N π in ABC-stacked multilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 80, 165409 (2009)

2009
[34]

Zhang, B

F. Zhang, B. Sahu, H. Min, and A. H. MacDonald, Band structure of ABC-stacked graphene trilayers, Phys. Rev. B 82, 035409 (2010)

2010
[35]

Shtyk, G

A. Shtyk, G. Goldstein, and C. Chamon, Electrons at the monkey saddle: A multicritical Lifshitz point, Phys. Rev. B 95, 035137 (2017)

2017
[36]

N. F. Q. Yuan, H. Isobe, and L. Fu, Magic of high-order van Hove singularity, Nat. Commun. 10, 5769 (2019)

2019
[37]

N. F. Q. Yuan and L. Fu, Classiﬁcation of critical points in energy bands based on topology, scaling, and symme- try, Phys. Rev B 101, 125120 (2020)

2020
[38]

Chandrasekaran, A

A. Chandrasekaran, A. Shtyk, J. J. Betouras, and C. Chamon, Catastrophe theory classiﬁcation of Fermi sur- face topological transitions in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 013355 (2020)

2020
[39]

Classen and J

L. Classen and J. J. Betouras, High-order van Hove sin- gularities and their connection to ﬂat bands, Ann. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys., (2025)

2025
[40]

Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-ﬁlling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature 556, 80 (2018)

2018
[41]

G. Chen, L. Jiang, S. Wu, B. Lyu, H. Li, B. L. Chittari, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Shi, J. Jung, Y. Zhang, and F. Wang, Evidence of a gate-tunable Mott insulator in a trilayer graphene moir´ e superlattice, Nat. Phys. 15, 237 (2019)

2019
[42]

Y. Tang, L. Li, T. Li, Y. Xu, S. Liu, K. Barmak, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Simulation of Hubbard model physics in WSe2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature19, 353 (2020)

2020
[43]

Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarrio-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture 556, 43 (2018)

2018
[44]

Yankowitz, S

M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watan- abe, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning su- perconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science 363, 1059 (2019)

2019
[45]

X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, A. Bachtold, A. H. MacDonald, and D. K. Efetov, Su- perconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature 574, 653 (2019)

2019
[46]

G. Chen, A. L. Sharpe, P. Gallagher, I. T. Rosen, E. J. Fox, L. Jiang, B. Lyu, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Jung, Z. Shi, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Y. Zhang, and F. Wang, Signatures of tunable superconductivity in a trilayer graphene moir´ e superlattice, Nature 572, 215 (2019)

2019
[47]

H. S. Arora, R. Polski, Y. Zhang, A. Thomson, Y. Choi, H. Kim, Z. Lin, I. Z. Wilson, X. Xu, J.-H. Chu, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, J. Alicea, and S. Nadj-Perge, Super- conductivity in metallic twisted bilayer graphene stabi- lized by WSe 2, Nature 583, 379 (2020)

2020
[48]

J. M. Park, Y. Cao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Tunable strongly coupled superconduc- tivity in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene, Nature 590, 249 (2021)

2021
[49]

Z. Hao, A. M. Zimmerman, P. Ledwith, E. Khalaf, D. H. Najafabadi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, and P. Kim, Electric ﬁeld-tunable superconductivity in alternating-twist magic-angle trilayer graphene, Scienc e 371, 1133 (2021)

2021
[50]

H. Zhou, T. Xie, Takashi, K. Watanabe, and A. F. Young, Superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene, Nature 598, 434 (2021)

2021
[51]

H. Zhou, L. Holleis, Y. Saito, L. Cohen, W. Huynh, C. L. Patterson, F. Yang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and A. F. Young, Isospin magnetism and spin-polarized su- perconductivity in Bernal bilayer graphene, Science 375, 774 (2022)

2022
[52]

Y. Xia, Z. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Unconventional superconductivity in twisted bilayer WSe 2, Nature (2024)

2024
[53]

Y. Guo, J. Pack, J. Swann, L. Holtzman, M. Cothrine, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. G. Mandrus, K. Barmak, J. Hone, A. J. Millis, A. Pasupathy, and C. R. Dean, Super- conductivity in twisted bilayer WSe 2, arXiv: 2406.03418

arXiv
[54]

T. Han, Z. Lu, Y. Yao, L. Shi, J. Yang, J. Seo, S. Ye, Z. Wu, M. Zhou, H. Liu, G. Shi, Z. Hua, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Xiong, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Signatures of chiral Superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene, arXiv:2408.15233

arXiv
[55]

Polshyn, M

H. Polshyn, M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, Y. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. R. Dean, and A. F. Young, 7 Large linear-in-temperature resistivity in twisted bilay er graphene, Nat. Phys. 15, 1011 (2019)

2019
[56]

Y. Cao, D. Chowdhury, D. Rodan-Legrain, O. Rubies- Bigorda, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Senthil, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Strange metal in magic-angle graphene with near Planckian dissipation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 076801 (2020)

2020
[57]

H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J.-H. Chu, T. Cao, L. Fu, W. Yao, C.- Z. Chang, D. Cobden, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous Hall eﬀect, Nature 622, 74 (2023)

2023
[58]

F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, J. Jia, Z. Shi, S. Jiang, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, and T. Li, Observation of integer and fractional quantum anomalous Hall eﬀects in twisted bilayer MoTe2, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031037 (2023)

2023
[59]

Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Fractional quantum anomalous Hall eﬀect in multilayer graphene, Nature 626, 759 (2024)

2024
[61]

Shankar, Renormalization-group approach to intera ct- ing fermions, Rev

R. Shankar, Renormalization-group approach to intera ct- ing fermions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 129 (1994)

1994
[62]

Goswami and S

P. Goswami and S. Chakravarty, Quantum criticality be- tween topological and band insulators in 3+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 196803 (2011)

2011
[63]

Hosur, S

P. Hosur, S. A. Parameswaran, and A. Vishwanath, Charge transport in Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 046602 (2012)

2012
[64]

E.-G. Moon, C. Xu, Y. B. Kim, and L. Balents, Non- Fermi-liquid and topological states with strong spin-orbi t coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 206401 (2013)

2013
[65]

I. F. Herbut and L. Janssen, Topological Mott insulator in three-dimensional systems with quadratic band touch- ing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 106401 (2014)

2014
[66]

Yang, E.-G

B.-J. Yang, E.-G. Moon, H. Isobe, and N. Nagaosa, Quantum criticality of topological phase transitions in three-dimensional interacting electronic systems, Nat. Phys. 10, 774 (2014)

2014
[67]

A. A. Abrikosov, Gapless state of bismuth-type semimet - als, J. Low. Temp. Phys. 8, 315 (1972)

1972
[68]

Isobe, B.-J

H. Isobe, B.-J. Yang, A. Chubukov, J. Schmalian, and N. Nagaosa, Emergent non-Fermi-liquid at the quantum critical point of a topological phase transition in two di- mensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 076803 (2016)

2016
[69]

G. Y. Cho and E.-G. Moon, Novel quantum criticality in two dimensional topological phase transitions, Sci. Rep. 6, 19198 (2016)

2016
[70]

Wang, G.-Z

J.-R. Wang, G.-Z. Liu, and C.-J. Zhang, Excitonic pair- ing and insulating transition in two-dimensional semi- Dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 95, 075129 (2017)

2017
[71]

Lai, Correlation eﬀects in double-Weyl semimeta ls, Phys

H.-H. Lai, Correlation eﬀects in double-Weyl semimeta ls, Phys. Rev. B 91, 235131 (2015)

2015
[72]

Jian and H

S.-K. Jian and H. Yao, Correlated double-Weyl semimet- als with Coulomb interactions: Possible applications to HgCr2Se4 and SrSi 2, Phys. Rev. B 92, 045121 (2015)

2015
[73]

Wang, G.-Z

J.-R. Wang, G.-Z. Liu, and C.-J. Zhang, Quantum phase transition and unusual critical behavior in multi-Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 96, 165142 (2017)

2017
[74]

Zhang, S.-K

S.-X. Zhang, S.-K. Jian, and H. Yao, Correlated triple- Weyl semimetals with Coulomb interactions, Phys. Rev. B 96, 241111(R) (2017)

2017
[75]

Wang, G.-Z

J.-R. Wang, G.-Z. Liu, and C.-J. Zhang, Breakdown of Fermi liquid theory in topological multi-Weyl semimet- als, Phys. Rev. B 98, 205113 (2018)

2018
[76]

Wang, G.-Z

J.-R. Wang, G.-Z. Liu, and C.-J. Zhang, Topological quantum critical point in a triple-Weyl semimetal: Non- Fermi-liquid behavior and instabilities, Phys. Rev. B 99, 195119 (2019)

2019
[77]

S. Han, C. Lee, E.-G. Moon, and H. Min, Emergent anisotropic non-Fermi liquid at a topological phase tran- sition in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 187601 (2019)

2019
[78]

Zhang, S.-K

S.-X. Zhang, S.-K. Jian, and H. Yao, Quantum critical- ity preempted by nematicity, Phys. Rev. B 103, 165129 (2021)

2021
[79]

B. Roy, M. P. Kennett, K. Yang, and V. Juriˇ ci´ c, From birefringent electrons to a marginal or non-Fermi liquid of relativistic spin-1 /2 fermions: An emergent superuni- versality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 157602 (2018)

2018
[80]

V. N. Kotov, B. Uchoa, and O. P. Sushov, Coulomb interactions and renormalization of semi-Dirac fermions near a topological Lifshitz transition, Phys. Rev. B 103, 045403 (2021)

2021
[81]

Lee and Y.-L

Y.-W. Lee and Y.-L. Lee, Correlated second-order Dirac semimetals with Coulomb interactions, Phys. Rev. B 105, 125110 (2022)

2022
[82]

Roy and V

B. Roy and V. Juriˇ ci´ c, Correlated fractional Dirac mate- rials, Phys. Rev. Research 5, L032002 (2023)

2023
[83]

See Supplemental Material for the details of the calcul a- tion
[84]

D. V. Khveshchenko, Ghost excitonic insulator transit ion in layered graphite, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 246802 (2001)

2001
[85]

E. V. Gorbar, V. P. Gusynin, V. A. Miransky, I. A. Shovkovy, Magnetic ﬁeld driven metal-insulator phase transition in planar systems, Phys. Rev. B 66, 045108 (2002)

2002
[86]

G.-Z. Liu, W. Li, and G. Cheng, Interaction and exci- tonic insulating transition in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 79, 205429 (2009)

2009
[87]

O. V. Gamayun, E. V. Gorbar, and V. P. Gusynin, Gap generation and semimetal-insulator phase transition in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 81, 075429 (2010)

2010
[88]

Wang and G.-Z

J.-R. Wang and G.-Z. Liu, Absence of dynamical gap gen- eration in suspended graphene, New J. Phys. 14, 043036 (2012)

2012
[89]

Gonz´ alez, Phase diagram of the quantum electrody- namics of two-dimensional and three-dimensional Dirac semimetals, Phys

J. Gonz´ alez, Phase diagram of the quantum electrody- namics of two-dimensional and three-dimensional Dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 92, 125115(R) (2015)

2015
[90]

M. E. Carrington, C. S. Fischer, L. von Smekal, and M. H. Thoma, Dynamical gap generation in graphene with frequency-dependent renormalization eﬀects, Phys. Rev. B 94, 125102 (2016)

2016
[91]

M. E. Carrington, C. S. Fischer, L. von Smekel, and M. H. Thoma, Role of frequency dependence in dynamical gap generation in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 97, 115411 (2018)

2018
[92]

A. H. Castro Neto, Pauling’s dreams for graphene, Physics 2, 30 (2009)

2009
[93]

J. E. Drut and T. A. L¨ ahde, Is graphene in vacuum an insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 026902 (2009)

2009
[94]

D. E. Sheeky and J. Schmalia, Quantum critical scaling in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 226803 (2007)

2007
[95]

Qi, Y.-S

X.-L. Qi, Y.-S. Wu, and S.-C. Zhang, Topological quan- 8 tization of the spin Hall eﬀect in two-dimensional param- agnetic semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 74, 085308 (2006)

2006
[96]

Liu, S.-C

C.-X. Liu, S.-C. Zhang, and X.-L. Qi, The quantum anomalous Hall eﬀect: theory and experiment, Ann. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 7, 301 (2016)

2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [60]

Sheﬀer, R

Y. Sheﬀer, R. Queiroz, and A. Stern, Symmetries as the guiding principle for ﬂattening bands of Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021012 (2023)

work page 2023

[2] [1]

A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009)

2009

[3] [2]

V. N. Kotov, B. Uchoa, V. M. Pereira, F. Guinea, and A. H. Castro Neto, Electron-electron interactions in graphene: Current status and perspectives, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1067 (2012)

2012

[4] [3]

Vafek and A

O. Vafek and A. Vishwanath, Dirac fermions in solids: From high-Tc cuprates and graphene to topological insu- lators and Weyl semimetals, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 5, 83 (2014)

2014

[5] [4]

T. O. Wehling, A. M. Black-Schaﬀer, and A. V. Balatsky, Dirac materials, Adv. Phys. 63, 1 (2014)

2014

[6] [5]

M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

2010

[7] [6]

Qi and S.-C

X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

2011

[8] [7]

N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018)

2018