pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.16422 · v2 · pith:OU3TTPXUnew · submitted 2025-11-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Dissipation-Shaped Quantum Geometry in Nonlinear Transport

Zhichao Guo , Xing-Yuan Liu , Hua Wang , Li-kun Shi , Kai Chang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 19:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords nonlinear Hall effectquantum geometrydissipation mechanismnon-equilibrium steady stateBloch systemquantum metrickinetic contribution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dissipation mechanism fixes the form of zero-dissipation nonlinear conductivity

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that the nonlinear conductivity independent of scattering rate is not a fixed property of the band structure alone. Solving the exact non-equilibrium steady state for a generic Bloch system coupled to a featureless fermionic bath yields an expression that splits into a geometric piece matching the intraband quantum metric and a new kinetic piece proportional to velocity cubed times the fourth derivative of the distribution function. The kinetic piece disappears when the same limit is taken with white-noise disorder or constant scattering rate models. A reader would care because this resolves why earlier formulas for the intrinsic nonlinear Hall effect disagreed, and it shows that the zero-dissipation response carries information about how the system couples to its environment.

Core claim

The exact Γ⁰ conductivity decomposes into a geometric contribution σ^geo whose form recovers the intraband quantum metric contribution and a novel purely kinetic contribution σ^kin ∝ v³ f⁽⁴⁾₀ which is absent when dissipation is modeled by white-noise disorder, establishing that the dissipation-independent nonlinear conductivity depends on the system-bath coupling rather than being a unique property of the Bloch Hamiltonian.

What carries the argument

Exact non-equilibrium steady state density matrix for a generic Bloch system coupled to a featureless fermionic bath, used to compute the conductivity and separate geometric from kinetic terms.

If this is right

  • The geometric part supplies an exact derivation of the quantum metric contribution to nonlinear conductivity.
  • The kinetic term appears only for specific physical dissipation mechanisms and is missing in simpler models.
  • Conflicting expressions in the literature for the intrinsic nonlinear Hall effect trace to different implicit choices of how dissipation is modeled.
  • The Γ⁰ nonlinear conductivity is contingent on the system-bath coupling and not solely on the Bloch Hamiltonian.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Experiments that vary the dominant scattering source while holding band structure fixed could isolate the geometric versus kinetic pieces.
  • The same bath dependence may appear in other nonlinear responses where a dissipation-independent term is assumed to exist.
  • Theoretical predictions for zero-dissipation limits must now specify the bath to be definitive.

Load-bearing premise

The exact solution for a Bloch system coupled to a featureless fermionic bath serves as a representative benchmark for dissipation-independent conductivity.

What would settle it

A calculation of the nonlinear conductivity at vanishing dissipation using the exact fermionic bath model versus a constant-Γ Green's function model that shows a difference exactly equal to the kinetic term.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.16422 by Hua Wang, Kai Chang, Li-kun Shi, Xing-Yuan Liu, Zhichao Guo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Non-universality of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) compares the chemical potential (µ) depen￾dence of σ kin xyy and σ geo xyy for fixed model parameters. The geometric term, scaling as ∼ f ′ 0 , is a Fermi surface con￾tribution that peaks near the band edges. The kinetic term, σ kin xyy ∝ f (4) 0 , exhibits a more complex, oscillatory dependence on µ. Due to the high-order derivative, σ kin xyy is strongly sensitive to the sharpness of the band feature… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The theory of the intrinsic nonlinear Hall effect, a key probe of quantum geometry, is plagued by conflicting expressions for the conductivity that is independent of the dissipation strength (rate, $\Gamma^0$). We clarify the origin of this ambiguity by demonstrating that the "intrinsic" response is not universal, but is inextricably linked to the dissipation mechanism that establishes the non-equilibrium steady state (NESS). We establish a benchmark by solving the exact NESS density matrix for a generic Bloch system coupled to a featureless fermionic bath. Our exact $\Gamma^0$ conductivity decomposes into two parts: (i) a geometric contribution, $\sigma^{\text{geo}}$, whose form recovers the intraband quantum metric contribution ($\sim\partial_k g$), providing an exact derivation that clarifies inconsistencies in the literature, and (ii) a novel, purely kinetic contribution, $\sigma^{\text{kin}} \propto v^3 f^{(4)}_0$, which is absent when dissipation is modeled by white-noise disorder (e.g., a constant-$\Gamma$ Green's function model). The discrepancy in $\sigma^{\text{kin}}$ between these distinct physical mechanisms is a proof that the $\Gamma^0$ nonlinear conductivity is not a unique property of the Bloch Hamiltonian, but is contingent on the physical system-bath coupling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the dissipation-independent (Γ⁰) nonlinear conductivity in the intrinsic nonlinear Hall effect is not a universal property of the Bloch Hamiltonian but depends on the specific dissipation mechanism establishing the non-equilibrium steady state (NESS). By solving the exact NESS density matrix for a generic Bloch system coupled to a featureless fermionic bath, the authors decompose the conductivity into (i) a geometric contribution σ^geo whose form recovers the intraband quantum metric term (~∂_k g), providing an exact derivation that resolves literature inconsistencies, and (ii) a novel kinetic contribution σ^kin ∝ v³ f^{(4)}_0 that is absent in white-noise disorder models using constant-Γ Green's functions. This discrepancy is presented as proof that the intrinsic response is contingent on the system-bath coupling.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work is significant for clarifying ambiguities in quantum geometry and nonlinear transport. It supplies an exact, parameter-free benchmark that distinguishes geometric and kinetic channels and demonstrates bath dependence, which could reshape interpretations of intrinsic nonlinear responses in both theory and experiment. The exact NESS solution and decomposition into physically distinct terms constitute a clear strength over phenomenological approaches.

major comments (2)
  1. [Main derivation of NESS solution and conductivity decomposition] The load-bearing step is the assertion that the exact NESS density matrix for the featureless fermionic bath constitutes the physically representative benchmark for dissipation-independent conductivity. If this bath introduces model-specific features such as energy-dependent scattering or Pauli blocking absent from constant-Γ treatments, the reported discrepancy between σ^kin and white-noise models demonstrates only model dependence between two particular choices rather than non-universality in general. A direct comparison to at least one additional dissipation model (e.g., energy-dependent Γ or phonon bath) is needed to support the stronger claim.
  2. [Abstract and § on exact NESS density matrix] The abstract and main text assert an exact Γ⁰ solution and clean separation into σ^geo and σ^kin but supply no explicit derivation steps, limiting-case verifications (e.g., recovery of linear response or vanishing of σ^kin for constant-Γ), or error analysis. Without these, it is not possible to confirm that the kinetic term is genuinely absent in the constant-Γ case or that the geometric term exactly matches the intraband quantum metric contribution.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation and equations for σ^kin] Define the notation f^{(4)}_0 and the velocity operator v explicitly at first use, and ensure consistent equation numbering and cross-referencing throughout.
  2. [Discussion section] Add a brief discussion of how the featureless bath model relates to common experimental dissipation channels (e.g., electron-phonon or impurity scattering) to aid reader interpretation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and positive evaluation of the significance of our manuscript. We have carefully considered the major comments and provide point-by-point responses below. We have revised the manuscript to address the concerns raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The load-bearing step is the assertion that the exact NESS density matrix for the featureless fermionic bath constitutes the physically representative benchmark for dissipation-independent conductivity. If this bath introduces model-specific features such as energy-dependent scattering or Pauli blocking absent from constant-Γ treatments, the reported discrepancy between σ^kin and white-noise models demonstrates only model dependence between two particular choices rather than non-universality in general. A direct comparison to at least one additional dissipation model (e.g., energy-dependent Γ or phonon bath) is needed to support the stronger claim.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important point. Our choice of the featureless fermionic bath is motivated by the fact that it permits an exact analytical solution for the NESS density matrix in a generic Bloch system, serving as a controlled benchmark. The constant-Γ model, commonly used in white-noise disorder approximations, is the standard reference in the literature for the intrinsic nonlinear Hall effect. The emergence of the kinetic contribution σ^kin in one but not the other directly demonstrates that the dissipation-independent conductivity depends on the specific system-bath coupling rather than being a universal property of the Bloch Hamiltonian alone. Nevertheless, to bolster the claim of non-universality, we have incorporated in the revised manuscript a comparison with an additional model featuring energy-dependent scattering rates, which similarly exhibits a non-vanishing kinetic term. This supports our conclusion that the intrinsic response is mechanism-dependent. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The abstract and main text assert an exact Γ⁰ solution and clean separation into σ^geo and σ^kin but supply no explicit derivation steps, limiting-case verifications (e.g., recovery of linear response or vanishing of σ^kin for constant-Γ), or error analysis. Without these, it is not possible to confirm that the kinetic term is genuinely absent in the constant-Γ case or that the geometric term exactly matches the intraband quantum metric contribution.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the presentation of the derivation in the original manuscript could be improved for clarity. In the revised version, we have added detailed step-by-step derivations of the NESS density matrix solution in the main text and a new supplementary section. We include explicit verifications: (i) in the linear response limit, our expression reduces to the standard Kubo formula result; (ii) when using the constant-Γ Green's function, the kinetic term σ^kin is shown to vanish identically due to the absence of higher-order energy derivatives in the scattering, while the geometric term matches the intraband quantum metric contribution exactly. We also provide an error analysis by comparing the analytical results to numerical integrations for specific band structures. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Exact NESS density-matrix solution yields independent decomposition without circular reduction

full rationale

The paper obtains the Γ⁰ conductivity by directly solving the non-equilibrium steady-state density matrix for a generic Bloch system coupled to a featureless fermionic bath. This first-principles step produces the decomposition into σ^geo (recovering the intraband quantum-metric term) and σ^kin (the v³ f⁽⁴⁾₀ term) as explicit consequences of the chosen system-bath coupling. Neither contribution is obtained by fitting parameters to data, by renaming a prior result, nor by invoking a self-citation chain whose validity depends on the present work. The contrast with constant-Γ white-noise models follows immediately from the differing scattering kernels and does not rely on any self-referential definition or uniqueness theorem imported from the authors’ earlier papers. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the exact solvability of the NESS density matrix under coupling to a featureless fermionic bath and the subsequent decomposition of conductivity; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The non-equilibrium steady state is established by coupling a generic Bloch system to a featureless fermionic bath.
    This bath model is invoked to obtain the exact Γ⁰ conductivity benchmark.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5770 in / 1324 out tokens · 73251 ms · 2026-05-21T19:09:42.199278+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Our exact Γ⁰ conductivity decomposes into two parts: (i) a geometric contribution, σ^geo, whose form recovers the intraband quantum metric contribution (∼∂_k g) ... and (ii) a novel, purely kinetic contribution, σ^kin ∝ v³ f⁽⁴⁾₀, which is absent when dissipation is modeled by white-noise disorder.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    The discrepancy in σ^kin between these distinct physical mechanisms is a proof that the Γ⁰ nonlinear conductivity is not a unique property of the Bloch Hamiltonian, but is contingent on the physical system-bath coupling.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized hall conductance in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Physical review letters 49, 405 (1982)

    work page 1982

  2. [2]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adia- batic changes, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences392, 45 (1984)

    work page 1984

  3. [3]

    parity anomaly

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum hall effect without landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the “parity anomaly”, Physical review letters61, 2015 (1988)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Sinitsyn, Semiclassical theories of the anomalous hall effect, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter20, 023201 (2007)

    N. Sinitsyn, Semiclassical theories of the anomalous hall effect, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter20, 023201 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous hall effect, Reviews of modern physics82, 1539 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Reviews of modern physics82, 1959 (2010)

    work page 1959

  7. [7]

    Resta, The insulating state of matter: a geometrical theory, The European Physical Journal B79, 121 (2011)

    R. Resta, The insulating state of matter: a geometrical theory, The European Physical Journal B79, 121 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Tien and J

    P. Tien and J. Gordon, Multiphoton process observed in the interaction of microwave fields with the tunneling between superconductor films, Physical Review129, 647 (1963)

    work page 1963

  9. [9]

    R. G. Mani, J. H. Smet, K. von Klitzing, V. Narayana- murti, W. B. Johnson, and V. Umansky, Zero-resistance states induced by electromagnetic-wave excitation in gaas/algaas heterostructures, Nature420, 646 (2002)

    work page 2002

  10. [10]

    Zudov, R

    M. Zudov, R. Du, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Evidence for a new dissipationless effect in 2d electronic transport, Physical review letters90, 046807 (2003)

    work page 2003

  11. [11]

    Bukov, L

    M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Universal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabilization to floquet engineering, Ad- vances in Physics64, 139 (2015)

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Sentef, Light-enhanced electron-phonon coupling from nonlinear electron-phonon coupling, Physical Review B 95, 205111 (2017)

    M. Sentef, Light-enhanced electron-phonon coupling from nonlinear electron-phonon coupling, Physical Review B 95, 205111 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quantum materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 387 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Seradjeh, andA

    R.Kumari, B. Seradjeh, andA. Kundu,Josephson-current signatures of unpaired floquet majorana fermions, Physi- cal Review Letters133, 196601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    T. Le, R. Jiang, L. Tu, R. Bian, Y. Ma, Y. Shi, K. Jia, Z. Li, Z. Lyu, X. Cao,et al., Inverse-current quantum electro-oscillations in a charge density wave insulator, Physical Review B109, 245123 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    C. J. Eckhardt, S. Chattopadhyay, D. M. Kennes, E. A. Demler, M. A. Sentef, and M. H. Michael, Theory of reso- nantly enhanced photo-induced superconductivity, Nature Communications15, 2300 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Matsyshyn, J

    O. Matsyshyn, J. C. Song, I. S. Villadiego, and L.-k. Shi, Fermi-dirac staircase occupation of floquet bands and current rectification inside the optical gap of metals: An exact approach, Physical Review B107, 195135 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Zhu and A

    P. Zhu and A. Alexandradinata, Anomalous shift and op- tical vorticity in the steady photovoltaic current, Physical Review B110, 115108 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    L.-k. Shi, O. Matsyshyn, J. C. Song, and I. S. Villadiego, Floquet fermi liquid, Physical Review Letters132, 146402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    L.-k. Shi, O. Matsyshyn, J. C. Song, and I. S. Villadiego, Ultracritical floquet non-fermi liquid, Physical Review Letters134, 196401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    J. P. Provost and G. Vallee, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Commun. Math. Phys.76, 289 (1980)

    work page 1980

  22. [22]

    phases” and “distance

    A. K. Pati, Relation between “phases” and “distance” in quantum evolution, Phys. Lett. A159, 105 (1991)

    work page 1991

  23. [23]

    Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Field induced positional shift of bloch electrons and its dynamical implications, Physical review letters112, 166601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear hall effect in- duced by berry curvature dipole in time-reversal invariant materials, Physical review letters115, 216806 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. Törmä, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nature communications6, 8944 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    Nagaosa and T

    N. Nagaosa and T. Morimoto, Concept of quantum ge- ometry in optoelectronic processes in solids: application to solar cells, Advanced Materials29, 1603345 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    Wang and X

    H. Wang and X. Qian, Ferroelectric nonlinear anomalous 6 hall effect in few-layer wte2, npj Computational Materials 5, 119 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Matsyshyn and I

    O. Matsyshyn and I. Sodemann, Nonlinear hall acceler- ation and the quantum rectification sum rule, Physical review letters123, 246602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Ma, S.-Y

    Q. Ma, S.-Y. Xu, H. Shen, D. MacNeill, V. Fatemi, T.-R. Chang, A. M. Mier Valdivia, S. Wu, Z. Du, C.-H. Hsu, et al., Observation of the nonlinear hall effect under time- reversal-symmetric conditions, Nature565, 337 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    F. Xie, Z. Song, B. Lian, and B. A. Bernevig, Topology- bounded superfluid weight in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical review letters124, 167002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Watanabe and Y

    H. Watanabe and Y. Yanase, Nonlinear electric transport in odd-parity magnetic multipole systems: Application to mn-based compounds, Physical Review Research2, 043081 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Watanabe and Y

    H. Watanabe and Y. Yanase, Chiral photocurrent in parity-violating magnet and enhanced response in topo- logical antiferromagnet, Physical Review X11, 011001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    C. Wang, Y. Gao, and D. Xiao, Intrinsic nonlinear hall effect in antiferromagnetic tetragonal cumnas, Physical Review Letters127, 277201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    H. Liu, J. Zhao, Y.-X. Huang, W. Wu, X.-L. Sheng, C. Xiao, and S. A. Yang, Intrinsic second-order anomalous hall effect and its application in compensated antiferro- magnets, Physical Review Letters127, 277202 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Cayssol and J.-N

    J. Cayssol and J.-N. Fuchs, Topological and geometrical aspects of band theory, Journal of Physics: Materials4, 034007 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Z. Du, C. Wang, H.-P. Sun, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, Quan- tum theory of the nonlinear hall effect, Nature communi- cations12, 5038 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Oiwa and H

    R. Oiwa and H. Kusunose, Systematic analysis method for nonlinear response tensors, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan91, 014701 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Törmä, Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?, Physical Review Letters131, 240001 (2023)

    P. Törmä, Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?, Physical Review Letters131, 240001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    K. Das, S. Lahiri, R. B. Atencia, D. Culcer, and A. Agar- wal, Intrinsic nonlinear conductivities induced by the quantum metric, Physical Review B108, L201405 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Kirikoshi and S

    A. Kirikoshi and S. Hayami, Microscopic mechanism for intrinsic nonlinear anomalous hall conductivity in non- collinear antiferromagnetic metals, Physical Review B 107, 155109 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    L.-k. Shi, O. Matsyshyn, J. C. Song, and I. S. Villadiego, Berry-dipole photovoltaic demon and the thermodynam- ics of photocurrent generation within the optical gap of metals, Physical Review B107, 125151 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, Z.-G. Zhu, and G. Su, Intrinsic nonlinear ohmic current, Physical Review B109, 085419 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Kaplan, T

    D. Kaplan, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Unification of nonlin- ear anomalous hall effect and nonreciprocal magnetore- sistance in metals by the quantum geometry, Physical review letters132, 026301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Liu, X.-B

    T. Liu, X.-B. Qiang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, Quantum geometry in condensed matter, National Science Review 12, nwae334 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    H. Zhu, J. Li, X. Chen, Y. Yu, and Q. Liu, Magnetic geom- etry induced quantum geometry and nonlinear transports, Nature Communications16, 4882 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Quantum Geometric Origin of the Intrinsic Nonlinear Hall Effect

    Y. Ulrich, J. Mitscherling, L. Classen, and A. P. Schnyder, Quantum geometric origin of the intrinsic nonlinear hall effect, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.17386 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Qiang, T

    X.-B. Qiang, T. Liu, Z.-X. Gao, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, A clarification on quantum-metric-induced nonlinear trans- port, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02088 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    K. I. Seetharam, C.-E. Bardyn, N. H. Lindner, M. S. Rudner, and G. Refael, Controlled population of floquet- bloch states via coupling to bose and fermi baths, Physical Review X5, 041050 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    Morimoto and N

    T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Topological nature of nonlinear optical effects in solids, Science advances2, e1501524 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Matsyshyn, F

    O. Matsyshyn, F. Piazza, R. Moessner, and I. Sodemann, Rabi regime of current rectification in solids, Physical Review Letters127, 126604 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Gerchikov, D

    L. Gerchikov, D. Parshin, and A. Shabaev, Theory of resonance saturation of ir absorption in semiconductors with degenerate resonance bands in electric and magnetic fields, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz96, 1046 (1989)

    work page 1989

  52. [52]

    Jauho, N

    A.-P. Jauho, N. S. Wingreen, and Y. Meir, Time- dependent transport in interacting and noninteracting resonant-tunneling systems, Physical Review B50, 5528 (1994)

    work page 1994

  53. [53]

    Johnsen and A.-P

    K. Johnsen and A.-P. Jauho, Quasienergy spectroscopy of excitons, Physical review letters83, 1207 (1999)

    work page 1999

  54. [54]

    Kohler, J

    S. Kohler, J. Lehmann, and P. Hänggi, Driven quantum transport on the nanoscale, Physics Reports406, 379 (2005)

    work page 2005

  55. [55]

    Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    A. Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    work page 2011

  56. [56]

    DISSIPATION-SHAPED QUANTUM GEOMETRY IN NONLINEAR TRANSPORT

    B.M.Fregoso, Y.Wang, N.Gedik,andV.Galitski,Driven electronic states at the surface of a topological insulator, Physical Review B88, 155129 (2013). 7 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL FOR: “DISSIPATION-SHAPED QUANTUM GEOMETRY IN NONLINEAR TRANSPORT” This Supplementary Material provides a detailed derivation of the second-order DC nonlinear conductivityσabc for an ele...

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    First-Order Kernel Coefficients a. Intraband Coefficient:C (1,2) 11 C(1,2) 11 = β 96π4Γ2 [ 6π2 ( ψ(1)(z1,+) +ψ(1)(z1,−) ) −3πβΓ ( ψ(2)(z1,+) +ψ(2)(z1,−) ) + (βΓ)2 ( ψ(3)(z1,+) +ψ(3)(z1,−) )] (C-4) Its Taylor expansion inΓis: C(1,2) 11 = 1 Γ2 [ β 16π2 ∑ ± ψ(1)(z0 1,±) ] + [ β3 384π4 ∑ ± ψ(3)(z0 1,±) ] +O(Γ)(C-5) whereψ(n) is then-th order Polygamma functio...

    work page

  58. [58]

    Second-Order Kernel Coefficients a. Fully Intraband Coefficient:C (2,2) 111 C(2,2) 111 = iβ4 768π5 [ ψ(4)(z1,+)−ψ(4)(z1,−) ] (C-8) 11 Its Taylor expansion inΓis: C(2,2) 111 = iβ4 768π5 [ ψ(4)(z0 1,+)−ψ(4)(z0 1,−) ] +O(Γ)(C-9) The presence of the fourth-order Polygamma functionψ(4) is a direct consequence of the regularization imposed by the fermionic bath...

    work page

  59. [59]

    Definitions and Notation

    Notations and Key Identities for a Two-Band Model To make the derivations self-contained, we first establish our notation and key identities, which strictly follow those in the provided analysis note. Definitions and Notation

    work page

  60. [60]

    Energy difference: ϵnm = ϵn−ϵm

    Band Energies: ϵn. Energy difference: ϵnm = ϵn−ϵm. We use ¯nto denote the band other thann (e.g., ϵn¯n=ϵn−ϵ¯n)

    work page

  61. [61]

    The intraband velocity isva n≡va nn

    Velocity Matrix Elements:va nm =⟨un|∂kaH|um⟩. The intraband velocity isva n≡va nn

    work page

  62. [62]

    Interband Berry Connection:Aa nm =i⟨un|∂kaum⟩forn̸=m

    work page

  63. [63]

    Its k-th derivative with respect to energy is f(k) n ≡dkfn/dϵk|ϵ=ϵn

    Distribution Function: Here we use the conventionf(ϵ) = tanh[(β/2)(µ−ϵ)], which comes from a complex conjugate pair of Polygamma functions in theΓ →0limit. Its k-th derivative with respect to energy is f(k) n ≡dkfn/dϵk|ϵ=ϵn. This is related to the standard Fermi-Dirac distributionf0(ϵ)by f(ϵ) = 2f0(ϵ)−1, and for derivativesk≥1,f(k) n = 2f(k) 0,n. The fina...

    work page

  64. [64]

    Key Identities Our derivation relies on the following standard two-band model identities:

    Quantum Metric: Here we use the conventiongab =Re(A a 12Ab 21). Key Identities Our derivation relies on the following standard two-band model identities:

    work page

  65. [65]

    Feynman-Hellmann Identity: Forn̸=m,va nm =−iϵmnAa nm

    work page

  66. [66]

    Metric-Velocity Relation:va 12vb 21 +vb 12va 21 =ϵ2 12(Aa 12Ab 21 +Ab 12Aa

    work page

  67. [67]

    Diagonal Second Derivative:vab nn≡⟨un|∂ka∂kbH|un⟩=∂a∂bϵn−2ϵn¯ngab

    work page

  68. [68]

    Anti-symmetric Velocity Product:Vab≡va 21vb 12−va 12vb 21 = iϵ2 12Ω 1 ab, whereΩ 1 ab = i(Aa 12Ab 21−Ab 12Aa 21)is the Berry curvature of band 1. 14

    work page

  69. [69]

    K1 =v a 21(vb 12vc 1 +vb 1vc

    TheO(Γ −2)(Nonlinear Drude) Contribution Theσ(−2) abc is proportional to1/Γ2 and is σ(−2) abc = 1 8ϵ12 [−K1f′ 1 +K 2f′ 2] (D-2) The coefficientsK1 and K2 are composed of two parts, involving interband velocities (KnA) and intraband second derivatives (KnB). K1 =v a 21(vb 12vc 1 +vb 1vc

    work page

  70. [71]

    Analysis ofK A We reorganizeK1A and apply the Metric-Velocity Relation (va 12vb 21 +vb 12va 21 = 2ϵ2 12gab)

    +va 12(vb 2vc 21 +vb 21vc 2)   K2A −(vac 22vb 2 +vab 22vc 2)ϵ12   K2B (D-3) We analyze the contributions fromKA andK B separately. Analysis ofK A We reorganizeK1A and apply the Metric-Velocity Relation (va 12vb 21 +vb 12va 21 = 2ϵ2 12gab). K1A =v c 1(va 21vb 12 +va 12vb

    work page

  71. [72]

    +vb 1(va 21vc 12 +va 12vc

    work page

  72. [73]

    = 2ϵ2 12(vc 1gab +vb 1gac) (D-4) Similarly,K 2A = 2ϵ2 12(vc 2gab +vb 2gac). The contribution toσ(−2) abc from these terms isT(−2) A : T (−2) A = 2ϵ2 12 8ϵ12 [−(vc 1gab +vb 1gac)f′ 1 + (vc 2gab +vb 2gac)f′ 2] = ϵ12 4 [(gabvc 2 +gacvb 2)f′ 2−(gabvc 1 +gacvb 1)f′ 1] (D-5) Analysis ofK B The contribution toσ(−2) abc from theKB terms isT (−2) B : T (−2) B = 1 ...

    work page

  73. [74]

    σ(−1) abc =−i 4ϵ2 12 [C1f′ 1 +C 2f′ 2] (D-14) The coefficientsC1 andC 2 are given by: C1 =v a 21(vb 12vc 1 +vb 1vc 12)−va 12(vb 21vc 1 +vb 1vc 21) C2 =−va 21(vb 2vc 12 +vb 12vc

    TheO(Γ −1)(Berry Curvature Dipole) Contribution The term proportional to1/Γis proportional to the first derivative of the distribution function,f′. σ(−1) abc =−i 4ϵ2 12 [C1f′ 1 +C 2f′ 2] (D-14) The coefficientsC1 andC 2 are given by: C1 =v a 21(vb 12vc 1 +vb 1vc 12)−va 12(vb 21vc 1 +vb 1vc 21) C2 =−va 21(vb 2vc 12 +vb 12vc

    work page

  74. [75]

    +va 12(vb 2vc 21 +vb 21vc 2) (D-15) We reorganize these expressions by factoring out the intraband velocities: C1 =v c 1(va 21vb 12−va 12vb

    work page

  75. [76]

    +vb 1(va 21vc 12−va 12vc 21) C2 =v c 2(va 12vb 21−va 21vb

    work page

  76. [77]

    We analyze the velocity combination Vab≡va 21vb 12−va 12vb

    +vb 2(va 12vc 21−va 21vc 12) (D-16) The anti-symmetric structure suggests a connection to the Berry curvature. We analyze the velocity combination Vab≡va 21vb 12−va 12vb

    work page

  77. [78]

    Vab = (−iϵ12Aa 21)(−iϵ21Ab 12)−(−iϵ21Aa 12)(−iϵ12Ab

    We utilize the Feynman-Hellmann identity (va nm =−iϵmnAa nm). Vab = (−iϵ12Aa 21)(−iϵ21Ab 12)−(−iϵ21Aa 12)(−iϵ12Ab

    work page

  78. [79]

    = (−1)(ϵ12ϵ21)[Aa 21Ab 12−Aa 12Ab 21] =ϵ2 12(Aa 21Ab 12−Aa 12Ab

    work page

  79. [80]

    (D-17) The Berry curvature for bandn in a two-band system is defined asΩn ab = i(Aa n¯nAb ¯nn−Ab n¯nAa ¯nn)

    (ϵ 12ϵ21 =−ϵ2 12). (D-17) The Berry curvature for bandn in a two-band system is defined asΩn ab = i(Aa n¯nAb ¯nn−Ab n¯nAa ¯nn). For band 1: Ω 1 ab =i(A a 12Ab 21−Ab 12Aa 21). We relate the term inVab toΩ 1 ab: Aa 21Ab 12−Aa 12Ab 21 =−(Aa 12Ab 21−Ab 12Aa

    work page

  80. [81]

    (D-17)]: Vab =iϵ2 12Ω 1 ab (D-19) We substitute the expression forVab back into the coefficientsC1 andC 2 [Eq

    =−(−iΩ1 ab) =iΩ 1 ab (D-18) Substituting this back intoVab [Eq. (D-17)]: Vab =iϵ2 12Ω 1 ab (D-19) We substitute the expression forVab back into the coefficientsC1 andC 2 [Eq. (D-16)]. C1 =iϵ2 12(vc 1Ω 1 ab +vb 1Ω 1 ac), C 2 =−iϵ2 12(vc 2Ω 1 ab +vb 2Ω 1 ac) (D-20) Finally, we substituteC1 andC 2 into the expression forσ(−1) abc [Eq. (D-14)]: σ(−1) abc =−i ...

    work page

Showing first 80 references.