Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Influence-aware Memory Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.07643 v4 pith:OUANY4VJ submitted 2019-11-18 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords informationmemoryrecurrentstatearchitecturesdeepdifficultieshidden
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Due to its perceptual limitations, an agent may have too little information about the state of the environment to act optimally. In such cases, it is important to keep track of the observation history to uncover hidden state. Recent deep reinforcement learning methods use recurrent neural networks (RNN) to memorize past observations. However, these models are expensive to train and have convergence difficulties, especially when dealing with high dimensional input spaces. In this paper, we propose influence-aware memory (IAM), a theoretically inspired memory architecture that tries to alleviate the training difficulties by restricting the input of the recurrent layers to those variables that influence the hidden state information. Moreover, as opposed to standard RNNs, in which every piece of information used for estimating Q values is inevitably fed back into the network for the next prediction, our model allows information to flow without being necessarily stored in the RNN's internal memory. Results indicate that, by letting the recurrent layers focus on a small fraction of the observation variables while processing the rest of the information with a feedforward neural network, we can outperform standard recurrent architectures both in training speed and policy performance. This approach also reduces runtime and obtains better scores than methods that stack multiple observations to remove partial observability.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools