Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 42 references

Double Poisson (vertex) algebra cohomology

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes a completed double Poisson cohomology that needs no noncommutative bivector and induces classical Poisson cohomology on every representation space.

desk verdict This is a serious, substantial memoir that delivers the central claim—a bivector-free completed double Poisson cohomology plus new dPVA cohomologies—though the square-zero proof at its core is a sign-heavy cancellation argument that deserves independent checking. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.21232 v3 pith:OUEOPMUN submitted 2025-09-25 math.RT math.RAmath.SG

Maxime Fairon , Daniele Valeri This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.RTmath.RAmath.SG MSC 17B6317B69
keywords doublePoissonalgebravertexcompletedcohomologyrepresentationfunctorquiverpathnoncommutativemultivectorfieldsvariational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central claim is that double Poisson algebras—noncommutative analogues of Poisson algebras, defined by a double bracket that induces ordinary Poisson brackets on every representation space—carry a cohomology theory that needs no noncommutative bivector. This completed double Poisson cohomology is built directly from the double bracket, and its differential squares to zero precisely because the bracket satisfies the double Jacobi identity. The theory has quasi-Poisson and gauged variants, and it obeys the representation-functor compatibility principle: for each dimension $N$ it produces a map to the ordinary Poisson cohomology of the $N$-th representation algebra. A parallel family of basic, reduced, and variational cohomologies is constructed for double Poisson vertex algebras, again compatible with representations. Applications include acyclicity of the completed complex for path algebras of quivers and explicit computations for constant $\lambda$-brackets on algebras of noncommutative differential polynomials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the completed double Poisson complex $(dBR(A), bd)$. In degree 0, $dBR(A)$ contains $A^{\sharp} = A/[A,A]$; in degree $n \geq 1$ it contains all $n$-brackets, i.e. cyclically skewsymmetric maps $A^{\otimes n} \to A^{\otimes n}$ satisfying a Leibniz rule. The differential $bd$ is defined by summing over cyclic permutations the two ways of inserting the double bracket $\{\{-,-\}\}$ into an $n$-bracket; the double Poisson identity is exactly the condition that makes $bd^2 = 0$. The same differential can be rewritten as a compact cyclic formula that makes the comparison with double Lie-Rinehart cohomology and the proof of compatibility with representation functors straightforward.

What would settle it

Take a double Poisson bracket that is not induced by a bivector, for example the bracket (6.10) on the truncated algebra $k\langle u,v \rangle/(u^2,v^2)$, and compute $bd^2$ on a general 2-bracket by writing out every term in the decomposition (4.6). Any nonzero surviving term would disprove Theorem 4.3; a full cancellation in a case where the multivector-to-bracket maps are neither injective nor surjective would confirm that the square-zero property genuinely follows from the Poisson condition alone.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the obstruction to defining double Poisson cohomology without a bivector can be removed. Given any double Poisson bracket $\{\{-,-\}\}$ on an algebra $A$, the graded space $dBR(A)$ of $n$-brackets carries a square-zero differential $bd$ defined by cyclically inserting the double bracket into an $n$-bracket; the paper proves $bd^2=0$ and calls the resulting cohomology the completed double Poisson cohomology $ddPH(A)$. When the bracket does come from a noncommutative bivector, the new differential is compatible with the older bivector differential via a morphism of complexes, so the two cohomologies agree whenever the natural map from multivector fields to brackets is an isomorphism. The same construction is adapted to double quasi-Poisson and gauged double Poisson brackets, and a further theorem shows that each representation functor sends $ddPH(A)$ into the ordinary Poisson cohomology $H_{CE}(A_N)$ of the representation algebra. On the vertex side, the paper defines basic, reduced, and variational double Poisson vertex algebra cohomologies and proves the analogous representation-functor compatibility for the variational theory.

Load-bearing premise

The construction collapses if the long permutation-and-sign identities behind $bd^2 = 0$ fail: the proof that the differential squares to zero is a direct computation that relies on the tensor identities of Lemmas 1.5 and 1.6, and any hidden restriction there—say on how cyclic permutations interact with the bimodule actions—would leave a differential that is not square-zero.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Completed double Poisson cohomology is now defined for every double Poisson algebra, including truncated polynomial algebras whose brackets do not come from noncommutative bivectors.
  • Each representation functor produces a linear map $ddPH(A) \to H_{CE}(A_N)$ and, for vertex algebras, $dPvH(V) \to PvH(V_N)$, extending the representation-functor compatibility principle to cohomology.
  • The completed double Poisson cohomology of a path algebra of a quiver with a non-degenerate constant double Poisson bracket vanishes in positive degree, with degree-zero cohomology of dimension equal to the number of vertices.
  • For a constant 2-fold $\lambda$-bracket on noncommutative differential polynomials, the basic and reduced/variational dPVA cohomologies are infinite-dimensional for $M \geq 1$, unlike their commutative counterparts.
  • The jet and quotient functors induce maps from double Poisson algebra cohomology to variational dPVA cohomology and back, relating the two theories together with their representation-algebra counterparts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the construction is sound, deformation theory for double Poisson brackets can be run without knowing a bivector, and the second cohomology group already yields a criterion for compatible pairs of double Poisson brackets on arbitrary, including singular, algebras.
  • The representation-functor compatibility suggests a tool for bi-Hamiltonian integrability on all representation spaces simultaneously: a noncommutative 2-cocycle that is itself Poisson should induce compatible Poisson brackets on every representation algebra, giving a testable route to families of integrable systems.
  • The contrast between infinite-dimensional dPVA cohomology and the finite-dimensional commutative PVA cohomology suggests that noncommutative integrable systems have many more deformation directions; one could test this by computing first-order deformations of constant brackets and asking whether the new brackets remain compatible.
  • One might conjecture that the comparison map from bivector-based double Poisson cohomology to the completed theory is an isomorphism not only when the map from multivector fields to brackets is an isomorphism, but also for a wider class of quasi-free algebras; this could be checked on free algebras and path algebras.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops cohomology theories for double Poisson algebras and double Poisson vertex algebras. In Part 1, it defines a completed double Poisson cohomology ddPH(A) for an arbitrary double Poisson bracket on A, without requiring the bracket to be defined by a noncommutative bivector, and proves that the associated differential bd squares to zero (Theorem 4.3). It compares ddPH with the Pichereau--Van de Weyer cohomology dPH, extends the construction to double quasi-Poisson and gauged double Poisson brackets, and carries out explicit computations including acyclicity for path algebras of quivers and several one- and two-generator examples. In Part 2, the paper constructs basic, reduced and variational double Poisson vertex algebra cohomologies, proves their compatibility with representation functors, and computes them for constant 2-fold lambda-brackets, obtaining infinite-dimensional cohomology spaces in contrast with the commutative case. Part 3 relates the two theories through noncommutative jet and quotient functors.

Significance. If the central technical claim holds, this is a substantial contribution: it removes the standing assumption in Pichereau--Van de Weyer cohomology that a noncommutative bivector exists, and it provides the first cohomology theories for double Poisson vertex algebras that are compatible with the Kontsevich--Rosenberg principle. The paper is also commendable for its explicit computations, its honest correction of a claim in [35] in Remark 3.15, and its clear statement of an unproved conjecture in Remark 5.18. The dPVA cohomology computations and the quiver acyclicity result are concrete and falsifiable. However, the square-zero property of bd is the load-bearing step, and its proof rests on long, sign-heavy combinatorial identities whose verification is not fully self-contained, as discussed below.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1.2, Theorem 4.3; Lemma 1.5(d), Eq. (1.19)] The construction of completed double Poisson cohomology reduces to Theorem 4.3(2), the assertion bd^2 = 0. The proof is an elaborate cancellation argument whose Steps iv--v rely directly on the tensor identities in Lemma 1.5 and Lemma 1.6. Lemma 1.5(d) contains a display typo: the second case is printed as "t≤h≤n−1" although t is not defined in the statement; the intended inequality presumably begins with h = i or h = i+1. Since (1.19) is used in the cancellation argument for the terms C_{1,≥2}, the current text does not allow the reader to check the proof independently. I ask that the authors correct this identity and provide a complete proof of Lemmas 1.5--1.6, or else include a machine-checkable verification of the cancellations in Steps iv--v. This is the load-bearing step for all subsequent results, including Theorem 7.8 and the applications in Chapter 6, so it cannot be left in its present state.
  2. [Remark 4.8] Remark 4.8 states that the square-zero property of bd and the morphism of complexes can alternatively be proved using the graded Lie bracket constructed in the unpublished work [42]. For a claim of this centrality, an unpublished note shared with the authors is not an independent verification available to the readers. The current manuscript should contain the full proof of bd^2 = 0, or at least state explicitly that Theorem 4.3 is the only published proof. This issue appears again in Remark 7.9, so it should be addressed in both places.
  3. [§5.2, Proposition 5.11] Proposition 5.11 asserts that bd remains a square-zero differential for double quasi-Poisson brackets. The proof reuses the bulk of the proof of Theorem 4.3 and replaces only Steps i and ii by a new computation using (5.11). Consequently the quasi-Poisson analogue inherits any sign error in the shared combinatorial core of Lemmas 1.5--1.6. This dependence should be stated explicitly, and the quasi-Poisson-specific cancellations should be written out in full; otherwise the computations in Section 6.2.3, such as Proposition 6.15, are only as reliable as the unverified identities of Chapter 1.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Chapter 1, Lemma 1.2] The proof of Lemma 1.2 is omitted as "straightforward". While this is acceptable for a book-length manuscript, given the central role of the related identity (1.19), a one-line proof or a cross-reference to the proof of Lemma 1.5 would help the reader.
  2. [§6.2.4, Lemma 6.17] In the proof of Lemma 6.17, the notation Q∆ for the class of Q modulo im ι∆ is used without being defined in that section; a brief reminder of the definition from Section 5.1 would improve readability.
  3. [Remark 5.18] The conjecture that the square-zero property may fail for the completed gauged cohomology in full generality is an honest and useful caveat. I suggest adding a short mention of this limitation in the introduction so that readers do not assume the gauged completed theory is proven in the same cases as the non-completed one.
  4. [General] The memoir is very long and sign-heavy; a short appendix collecting the key identities (1.15)--(1.19), with complete proofs, would substantially improve verifiability and is strongly recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the cohomology theories are defined directly and their key properties are proved in the paper, with cited prior work used as background or independent support.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are new definitions and direct proofs, not empirical predictions or fitted parameters. The completed double Poisson cohomology ddPH is defined from an arbitrary double Poisson bracket by an explicit differential bd (Definition 4.1), and the square-zero property is proved in Theorem 4.3 by a long cancellation computation inside the text; it does not invoke the target cohomology as an input. The comparison with Pichereau-Van de Weyer cohomology (Theorem 4.6) is a proven morphism of complexes, and the compatibility with representation functors (Theorem 7.8) is likewise established by checking the commutativity of the diagram on generators using Chemla's formula. Citations to Van den Bergh, Pichereau-Van de Weyer, De Sole-Kac, and Chemla supply definitions, prior constructions, and an independent formula; they are not used as substitutes for the paper's own proofs. The citation to [21], coauthored by the second author, provides the background notion of double Poisson vertex algebra, but the cohomology theories in Part 2 are new objects whose differentials are defined and proved square-zero in Theorems 9.17 and 10.6. Remark 4.8 mentions an unpublished work [42] as an alternative route, but the main proof does not depend on it. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' own prior work to force a choice, and no known result is merely renamed in new coordinates. The skepticism expressed about possible sign errors in Lemmas 1.5-1.6 and Steps iv-v concerns verification risk, not circularity, and the instructions correctly exclude correctness concerns from the circularity score. Thus the derivation chain is self-contained for the claims it makes, and the honest finding is no circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces new cohomology functors (ddPH, dHbas, dHred, dPvH) as definitions rather than empirical hypotheses. They are built from standard algebraic objects (n-brackets, lambda-brackets) and their properties are proven. There are no free parameters fitted to data; the constants in examples (lambda, mu, nu in k[x]) are free choices in a classification, not fitted values. No unexplained entities are introduced to force results.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The base field k is algebraically closed of characteristic zero.
    Stated at the start of Chapter 1; many algebraic geometry and representation theory results depend on this.
  • standard math Van den Bergh's theorem that a double Poisson bracket induces a Poisson bracket on each representation algebra (Theorem 7.1).
    Used throughout as the foundation for the Kontsevich-Rosenberg compatibility; cited to [38].
  • standard math De Sole-Kac's construction of basic, reduced and variational PVA cohomologies (recalled in Chapter 8).
    The dPVA cohomologies are defined as noncommutative analogues of these recalled theories.
  • standard math Powell's classification of double Poisson brackets on k[x].
    Used in Example 3.5 and Section 6.1 to parameterize all such brackets.
  • standard math Chemla's double Lie-Rinehart cohomology (Proposition 4.11).
    Used to relate Chemla's formula to an existing cohomology theory.
  • standard math The jet and quotient functors for associative algebras from [11].
    Used in Part 3 to relate double Poisson and dPVA cohomologies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Double Poisson (vertex) algebra cohomology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OUEOPMUN

@misc{pith2026250921232,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Double Poisson (vertex) algebra cohomology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OUEOPMUN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.21232}
}
read the original abstract

A noncommutative (NC) version of Poisson geometry was initiated by Van den Bergh by introducing at the level of associative algebras the formalism of double Poisson brackets. Their key property is to induce (standard) Poisson brackets under each representation functor. Then, Pichereau and Van de Weyer developed and studied the corresponding cohomology theory under the assumption that there exists a NC bivector defining the double Poisson bracket. Our first main result is that one can remove this assumption by constructing a completed double Poisson cohomology valid in any situation, hence generalizing the approach of Pichereau-Van de Weyer. As an application, we show that the double Poisson cohomology complex associated to the path algebra of a quiver is acyclic. Furthermore, we show that this new double Poisson cohomology theory can be adapted to weaker forms of double Poisson brackets (called quasi-Poisson and gauged Poisson), and that it is compatible with representation functors. A second focus of this memoir concerns the formalism of double Poisson vertex algebras. These were introduced by De Sole, Kac and the second author, as NC versions of Poisson vertex algebras, which induce the latter structures under each representation functor. Our second main result is the development of cohomology theories for double Poisson vertex algebras. These are NC analogues of the basic, reduced and variational Poisson vertex algebra cohomologies. More importantly, we prove that under each representation functor these cohomology theories are compatible with their commutative counterparts. As an application, we compute the double Poisson vertex algebra cohomology of the generalized NC de Rham complex and of the generalized NC variational complex. Finally, we describe the relation between the double Poisson algebra and double Poisson vertex algebra cohomologies using jet and quotient functors.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [42]

    Private communication (2025)

    Zheng, Y.; Tan, Y.: Graded Lie algebras over spaces of multiple brackets and their applica- tions to deformations of double Poisson algebras . Private communication (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [35]

    Pichereau, A.; Van de Weyer, G.: Double Poisson cohomology of path algebras of quivers . J. Algebra 319, no. 5, 2166–2208 (2008); arXiv:math/0701837

    arXiv 2008

  3. [1]

    Goldman-Turaev formality implies Kashiwara-Vergne

    Alekseev, A.; Kawazumi, N.; Kuno, Y.; Naef, F.: Goldman-Turaev formality implies Kashiwara-Vergne. Quantum Topol. 11, no. 4, 657–689 (2020); arXiv:1812.01159

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  4. [2]

    Alekseev, A.; Kosmann-Schwarzbach, Y.; Meinrenken, E.: Quasi-Poisson manifolds. Canad. J. Math. 54, no.1, 3–29 (2002); arXiv:math/0006168

    arXiv 2002

  5. [3]

    Arakawa T.: A remark on the C2-cofiniteness condition on vertex algebras . Math. Z. 270, no. 1-2, 559-575 (2012); arXiv:1004.1492

    arXiv 2012

  6. [4]

    Preliminary version of the mono- graph (2024), 350pp

    Arakawa T.; Moreau A.: Arc spaces and vertex algebras . Preliminary version of the mono- graph (2024), 350pp

    work page 2024

  7. [5]

    Bakalov B., De Sole A., Heluani R., Kac V.G., An operadic approach to vertex algebra and Poisson vertex algebra cohomology Jpn. J. Math. 14, 249–342 (2019); arXiv:1806.08754

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  8. [6]

    Bakalov, B.; De Sole, A.; Heluani, R.; Kac, V.G.; Vignoli, V.: Classical and variational Poisson cohomology. Jpn. J. Math. 16, 203–246 (2021); arXiv:2101.10939

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

Show all 42 references
  1. [7]

    Selecta Math

    Bakalov, B.; De Sole, A.; Kac, V.G.: Computation of cohomology of Lie conformal and Pois- son vertex algebras . Selecta Math. (N.S.) 26, no. 4, Paper No. 50 (2020); arXiv:1903.12059

    2020 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Bakalov, B.; Kac, V.G.; Voronov, A.A.: Cohomology of conformal algebras. Commun. Math. Phys. 200 561–598 (1999); arXiv:math/9803022

    1999 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Barakat, A.; De Sole, A.; Kac, V.G.: Poisson vertex algebras in the theory of Hamiltonian equations. Jpn. J. Math. 4, 141–252 (2009); arXiv:0907.1275

    2009 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Mathematical aspects of quanti- zation, Contemp

    Berest, Y.; Chen, X.; Eshmatov, F.; Ramadoss, A.: Noncommutative Poisson structures, derived representation schemes and Calabi-Yau algebras . Mathematical aspects of quanti- zation, Contemp. Math., vol. 583, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2012, pp. 219–246; arXiv:1202.2717

    2012 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Bozec, T.; Fairon, M.; Moreau, A.: Functorial constructions related to double Poisson vertex algebras. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 112, No. 3, Article ID e70264, 73p. (2025); arXiv:2307.06071

    2025

  6. [12]

    Carlet, G.; Casati, M.; Shadrin, S.: Poisson cohomology of scalar multidimensional Dubrovin- Novikov brackets. J. Geom. Phys. 114, 404–419 (2017); arXiv:1512.05744

    2017 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Casati, M.; Wang, J.P.: Hamiltonian structures for integrable nonabelian difference equa- tions. Commun. Math. Phys. 392, No. 1, 219–278 (2022); arXiv:2101.06191

    2022 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Chemla, S.: Differential calculus over double Lie algebroids . J. Noncommut. Geom. 14, no. 1, 191–222 (2020); arXiv:1712.05619

    2020 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Crawley-Boevey, W.; Etingof, P.; Ginzburg, V.: Noncommutative geometry and quiver alge- bras. Adv. Math. 209, no. 1, 274–336 (2007); arXiv:math/0502301

    2007 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Preprint arXiv:2012.04451

    D’Alesio, S.: Noncommutative derived Poisson reduction. Preprint arXiv:2012.04451

    2012 arXiv

  11. [17]

    De Sole, A.; Kac, V.G.: Lie conformal algebra cohomology and the variational complex . Comm. Math. Phys. 292, no. 3, 667-719 (2009); arXiv:0812.4897

    2009 arXiv

  12. [18]

    De Sole, A.; Kac, V.G.: Essential variational Poisson cohomology . Comm. Math. Phys. 313, no. 3, 837-864 (2012); arXiv:1106.5882

    2012 arXiv

  13. [19]

    De Sole, A.; Kac, V.G.: The variational Poisson cohomology . Jpn. J. Math. (3) 8, No. 1, 1–145 (2013); arXiv:1106.0082

    2013 arXiv

  14. [20]

    De Sole, A.; Kac, V.G.; Valeri, D.: Classical W-algebras and generalized Drinfeld-Sokolov bi-Hamiltonian systems within the theory of Poisson vertex algebras . Comm. Math. Phys. 323, n. 2, 663-711 (2013); arXiv:1207.6286

    2013 arXiv

  15. [21]

    De Sole, A.; Kac, V.G.; Valeri, D.: Double Poisson vertex algebras and non-commutative Hamiltonian equations. Adv. Math. 281, 1025–1099 (2015); arXiv:1410.3325

    2015 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Fairon, M.: Double quasi-Poisson brackets: fusion and new examples . Algebr. Represent. Theory 24, 911–958 (2021); arXiv:1905.11273. 245 246 BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2021 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Fairon, M.; Valeri, D.: Double multiplicative Poisson vertex algebras . Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2023, 14991–15072 (2023); arXiv:2110.03418

    2023 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Huebschmann, J.: Quasi Poisson structures, weakly quasi Hamiltonian structures, and Pois- son geometry of various moduli spaces . J. Geom. Phys. 190, Paper No. 104851, 55 pp (2023); arXiv:2207.06002

    2023

  19. [25]

    Second edition

    Kac, V.G.: Vertex algebras for beginners . Second edition. University Lecture Series, 10. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, vi+201 pp (1998)

    1998

  20. [26]

    Kac, V.G.: Introduction to vertex algebras, Poisson vertex algebras, and integrable Hamil- tonian PDE. In: F. Callegaro et al. (Eds.), Perspectives in Lie theory. Springer INdAM Ser. 19, pp. 3–72 (2017); arXiv:1512.00821

    2017 arXiv

  21. [27]

    In: The Gelfand Mathe- matical Seminars, 1990–1992 , Birkh¨ auser, Boston, pp

    Kontsevich, M.: Formal (non)-commutative symplectic geometry . In: The Gelfand Mathe- matical Seminars, 1990–1992 , Birkh¨ auser, Boston, pp. 173–187 (1993)

    1993

  22. [28]

    In: The Gelfand Mathe- matical Seminars, 1996–1999 , Birkh¨ auser, Boston, pp

    Kontsevich, M.; Rosenberg, A.: Noncommutative smooth spaces . In: The Gelfand Mathe- matical Seminars, 1996–1999 , Birkh¨ auser, Boston, pp. 85–108 (2000)

    2000

  23. [29]

    Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 347

    Laurent-Gengoux, C.; Pichereau, A.; Vanhaecke, P.: Poisson structures . Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 347. Springer, Heidelberg, 2013

    2013

  24. [30]

    Magri, F.; Casati, P.; Falqui, G.; Pedroni, M.: Eight lectures on Integrable Systems . In: Y. Kosmann-Schwarzbach et al. (Eds.), Integrability of Nonlinear Systems , Lecture Notes in Physics 495, pp. 209–250 (2004)

    2004

  25. [31]

    Massuyeau, G.; Turaev, V.: Quasi-Poisson structures on representation spaces of surfaces . Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2014, no. 1, 1–64 (2014); arXiv:1205.4898

    2014 arXiv

  26. [32]

    11 309–331 (1872)

    Moreau, C.; Sur les permutations circulaires distinctes, Nouvelles Annales de Math´ ematiques, S´ erie 2, no. 11 309–331 (1872)

  27. [33]

    Nijenhuis, A.; Richardson, R.: Deformations of Lie algebra structures . J. Math. Mech. 17, 89–105 (1967)

    1967

  28. [34]

    In: Noncommutative birational geometry, representations and combinatorics, Con- temp

    Odesskii, A.V.; Rubtsov, V.N.; Sokolov, V.V.: Double Poisson brackets on free associative algebras. In: Noncommutative birational geometry, representations and combinatorics, Con- temp. Math., vol. 592, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2013, pp. 225–239; arXiv:1208.2935

    2013 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Powell, G.: On double Poisson structures on commutative algebras . J. Geom. Phys. 110, 1–8 (2016); arXiv:1603.07553

    2016 arXiv

  30. [37]

    In: Advances in Quan- tum Computation, Contemp

    Schedler, T.: Poisson algebras and Yang-Baxter equations . In: Advances in Quan- tum Computation, Contemp. Math., vol. 482, AMS, Providence, RI, 2009, pp. 91–106; arXiv:math/0612493

    2009 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Van den Bergh, M.: Double Poisson algebras . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 360, no. 11, 5711– 5769 (2008); arXiv:math/0410528

    2008 arXiv

  32. [39]

    In: Poisson geometry in mathematics and physics, Contemp

    Van den Bergh, M.: Non-commutative quasi-Hamiltonian spaces . In: Poisson geometry in mathematics and physics, Contemp. Math., vol. 450, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2008, pp. 273–299; arXiv:math/0703293

    2008 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Van de Weyer, G.: Double Poisson structures on finite dimensional semi-simple algebras . Algebr. Represent. Theory 11, no. 5, 437–460 (2008); arXiv:math/0603533

    2008 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Private communication (2025)

    Zheng, Y.; Tan, Y.: Graded Lie algebras associated to double Poisson vertex algebras. Private communication (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.