pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31489 · v1 · pith:OWUDDINUnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ✦ hep-th

Scattering of wobbling vortices

A. Alonso-Izquierdo , A. Gonz\'alez-Parra , A. Wereszczynski This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 04:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords vortex scatteringAbelian Higgs modelwobbling vorticesspectral flownon-adiabatic dynamicsinternal vibrational modesmoduli space approximationresonant energy transfer
0
0 comments X

The pith

Internal vibrational modes cause non-adiabatic vortex scattering with super-elastic collisions and fractal diagrams in the Abelian Higgs model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates scattering of vortices that carry excited internal vibrational modes in the Abelian Higgs model. It establishes that spectral flow combined with selective mode excitation produces effective forces and allows resonant energy exchange between the vortex center-of-mass motion and its internal oscillations. This mechanism renders the scattering process strongly non-adiabatic, replacing the usual slow-motion description with outcomes that include energy gain in collisions, final states that oscillate with tiny changes in starting parameters, and fractal patterns visible in scattering maps. A reader would care because the result shows that the internal structure of vortices cannot be ignored when predicting how they interact at finite speeds.

Core claim

We demonstrate that the interplay between spectral flow and mode excitation generates effective forces and enables resonant energy transfer between translational and internal degrees of freedom. As a result, vortex dynamics become strongly non-adiabatic, exhibiting super-elastic collisions, oscillatory dependence of the final state on initial conditions, and the emergence of fractal structures in scattering diagrams. Internal vibrational modes therefore play a fundamental role in vortex interactions, going beyond the standard moduli space approximation.

What carries the argument

the interplay between spectral flow and mode excitation, which generates effective forces and resonant energy transfer between translational and internal degrees of freedom

If this is right

  • Vortex scattering becomes strongly non-adiabatic instead of following adiabatic moduli-space motion.
  • Super-elastic collisions appear because energy is transferred from internal modes back to translation.
  • The final scattering state varies oscillatorily with small changes in initial velocity or impact parameter.
  • Fractal structures form in the scattering diagrams as a direct consequence of the resonant energy exchange.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mode-excitation mechanism may produce analogous non-adiabatic effects in other soliton systems that possess internal vibrational modes.
  • High-resolution numerical scans of initial-condition space could directly map the predicted fractal boundaries in scattering outcomes.
  • The reported phenomenology suggests that effective low-energy descriptions of vortices in condensed-matter or cosmological settings must retain at least the lowest internal modes when velocities are not small.

Load-bearing premise

Internal vibrational modes remain well-defined and can be selectively excited during scattering without being destroyed or strongly coupled to radiation modes.

What would settle it

Numerical evolution of two vortices with one internal mode excited that produces only elastic or inelastic scattering without super-elastic outcomes or fractal dependence on impact parameter would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31489 by A. Alonso-Izquierdo, A. Gonz\'alez-Parra, A. Wereszczynski.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Collision time correction factor κ as a function of the initial velocity and the excitation ampli￾tudes for λ = 0.5 (left), λ = 1 (middle) and λ = 1.2 (right). Therefore, treating the initial velocity as a continuous parameter, it is natural to express the phase as a function of v, φ(v) = κ d v ω √ 1 − v 2 + δ. Since the scattering dynamics is governed by the phase of the internal oscillation at the moment… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Velocity diagrams for the vx-component (a) and the vy-component (b), together with the amplitude diagram (c) and the number of bounces (d), for head-on scattering of two initially unexcited 1-vortices with λ = 0.5. As a first step, we consider the scattering of vortices without initial excitation, η0 = 0. The cor￾responding scattering diagrams are displayed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: High-resolution scattering diagrams in the interval [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: High-resolution scattering diagrams in the interval [0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Velocity diagrams for the vx-component (a) and the vy-component (b), together with the amplitude diagram (c) and the number of bounces (d), for head-on scattering of two initially excited 1-vortices with λ = 0.5 and η0 = 0.6. for which the resonant energy transfer mechanism is most efficient, namely those corresponding to the maxima of the final velocity observed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: presents the velocity and amplitude diagrams for collisions of unexcited vortices. In this situation, vortices always collide only once (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Velocity diagrams for the vx-component (a) and the vy-component (b), together with the amplitude diagram (c) and the number of bounces (d), for head-on scattering of two initially excited 1-vortices with λ = 1 and η0 = 0.6. One of the most striking features within this regime is the oscillatory dependence of the final velocity on the initial velocity. The velocity diagram is no longer monotonic but instead… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Time evolution of the excitation amplitude for the collision of two 1-vortices with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Velocity diagrams for the vx-component (a) and the vy-component (b), together with the amplitude diagram (c) and the number of bounces (d), for head-on scattering of two initially excited 1-vortices with λ = 1 and η0 = 1.5. To gain further insight into the behavior within the intervals separating the 1-bounce windows, we present in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Velocity diagrams for the vx-component (a) and the vy-component (b), together with the amplitude diagram (c) and the number of bounces (d), for head-on scattering of two initially excited 1-vortices with λ = 1 and η0 = 1.5 in the velocity interval [0.3012, 03179]. sense, increasing the excitation amplitude enhances the effective attractive interaction induced by the vibrational degrees of freedom, thereby… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Velocity diagrams for the vx-component (a) and the vy-component (b), together with the amplitude diagram (c) and the number of bounces (d), for head-on scattering of two initially excited 1-vortices with λ = 1.2 and η0 = 0.0. We begin by analyzing the scattering of unexcited vortices, η0 = 0. The corresponding scattering diagrams for λ = 1.2 are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Velocity diagrams for the vx-component (a) and the vy-component (b), together with the amplitude diagram (c) and the number of bounces (d), for head-on scattering of two initially excited 1-vortices with λ = 1.2 and η0 = 0.9. In addition to the oscillatory structure, two distinctive features arise in the Type-II regime. First, the threshold velocity vm, above which vortices are able to overcome the repuls… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Velocity diagrams for the vx-component (a) and the vy-component (b), together with the amplitude diagram (c) and the number of bounces (d), for head-on scattering of two initially excited 1-vortices with λ = 1.2 and η0 = 1.5. 5 Conclusions The scattering dynamics of wobbling vortices in the Abelian Higgs model is governed by a subtle interplay between static intersoliton forces and dynamical effects arisi… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Amplitude diagrams for head-on scattering of two unexcited 1-vortices with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Velocity scattering diagrams for head-on collisions of two excited 1-vortices. Columns corre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Amplitude scattering diagrams for head-on collisions of two excited 1-vortices. Columns [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the dynamical role of internal vibrational modes in the Abelian Higgs model, focusing on how Derrick-type excitations modify vortex dynamics and scattering processes. We study the scattering of excited vortices and show that the interplay between spectral flow and mode excitation generates effective forces and enables resonant energy transfer between translational and internal degrees of freedom. As a result, vortex dynamics become strongly non-adiabatic, exhibiting super-elastic collisions, oscillatory dependence of the final state on initial conditions, and the emergence of fractal structures in scattering diagrams. Our results demonstrate that internal vibrational modes play a fundamental role in vortex interactions, going beyond the standard moduli space approximation and revealing a rich phenomenology driven by mode dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the scattering of wobbling vortices in the Abelian Higgs model. It claims that the interplay between spectral flow and excitation of Derrick-type internal vibrational modes produces effective forces and resonant energy transfer between translational and internal degrees of freedom. This leads to strongly non-adiabatic dynamics, including super-elastic collisions, oscillatory dependence of the final state on initial conditions, and fractal structures in scattering diagrams, going beyond the moduli-space approximation.

Significance. If the reported phenomenology is robustly demonstrated with controlled numerics or analytic estimates that survive radiation effects, the work would be significant for soliton dynamics: it would establish a concrete mechanism by which internal modes invalidate the adiabatic approximation in vortex scattering and generate rich, non-integrable behavior.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and §1: The central claims of resonant energy transfer, super-elasticity, and fractal scattering diagrams presuppose that the discrete internal modes remain coherent and selectively excitable over the collision timescale. No estimate of radiation damping rates, imaginary parts of the mode frequencies, or comparison between mode lifetime and collision duration is provided; without this, the reported effects cannot be distinguished from radiation or numerical artifacts.
  2. The manuscript does not report any computation of the continuous spectrum of the fluctuation operator or the coupling of discrete modes to outgoing radiation; this omission is load-bearing for the assertion that mode dynamics dominate the scattering.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the internal-mode amplitudes and the definition of 'spectral flow' should be introduced explicitly in the introduction rather than assumed from prior literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for emphasizing the need to address radiation effects when claiming mode-driven non-adiabatic scattering. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and §1: The central claims of resonant energy transfer, super-elasticity, and fractal scattering diagrams presuppose that the discrete internal modes remain coherent and selectively excitable over the collision timescale. No estimate of radiation damping rates, imaginary parts of the mode frequencies, or comparison between mode lifetime and collision duration is provided; without this, the reported effects cannot be distinguished from radiation or numerical artifacts.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the manuscript contains no explicit calculation of radiation damping rates or imaginary parts of the frequencies. Our evidence instead comes from direct numerical integration of the full nonlinear equations of motion, which already incorporates radiation losses and continuum coupling. The reported super-elastic collisions and fractal scattering diagrams are reproducible across independent runs with different resolutions and initial data. In the revised manuscript we will add a new paragraph that extracts collision durations from the simulations and compares them with the observed periods of translational and internal oscillations, thereby providing an indirect but quantitative check on mode coherence during the interaction. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The manuscript does not report any computation of the continuous spectrum of the fluctuation operator or the coupling of discrete modes to outgoing radiation; this omission is load-bearing for the assertion that mode dynamics dominate the scattering.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a linear spectral decomposition of the fluctuation operator around the vortex background, including the continuous spectrum and radiation couplings, is not performed. Such an analysis is technically substantial and lies outside the scope of the present work, which focuses on the phenomenology revealed by nonlinear scattering simulations. We will insert a brief statement in the conclusions section noting this limitation and identifying the spectral calculation as a natural direction for follow-up work. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation relies on dynamical analysis of modes without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The provided abstract and description contain no equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations that reduce any claimed prediction or result to an input by construction. Claims about spectral flow, mode excitation, and non-adiabatic scattering are presented as outcomes of the model's dynamics rather than tautological redefinitions or renamed fits. No load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatze imported via self-citation are visible. The central phenomenology is therefore not forced by the paper's own inputs; external benchmarks or explicit computations would be needed to assess validity, but no circularity pattern is exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. All ledger entries are therefore empty.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5642 in / 1115 out tokens · 28922 ms · 2026-07-01T04:33:57.082453+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Manton, N.; Sutcliffe, P.;Topological solitonsCambridge University Press 2004

    2004

  2. [2]

    Vilenkin, A.; Shellard, P.;Cosmic strings and other topological defects, Cambridge University Press, 1994

    1994

  3. [3]

    Weinberg, E.J.;Classical solutions in quantum field theory: Solitons and Instantons in High Energy Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2012

    2012

  4. [4]

    3, 454-477

    Gross, E.P.;Structure of a quantized vortex in boson systems, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)20 (1961), no. 3, 454-477

    1955

  5. [5]

    Pitaevskii, L.P.;Vortex lines in an imperfect Bose gas, Sov. Phys. JETP13(1961), no. 2, 451-454

    1961

  6. [6]

    Fetter, A.L.;Vortices in an imperfect Bose gas. I. The condensate, Physical Review138(1965), no. 2A, A429

    1965

  7. [7]

    Hindmarsh M.B.; Kibble T.W.B.;Cosmic strings, Rept. Prog. Phys.58(1995) 477-562

    1995

  8. [8]

    Blanco-Pillado, J.J.; Cui, Y.; Kuroyanagi, S.; Lewicki, M.; Nardini, G.; Pieroni, M.; Rybak, I.Y.; Sousa, L.; Wachter, J.M.; LISA Cosmology Working Group;Gravitational waves from cosmic strings in LISA: reconstruction pipeline and physics interpretation, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (2025), no. 05, 006

    2025

  9. [9]

    Abrikosov, A.A.,On the magnetic properties of superconductors of the second group, Soviet Physics JETP5(1957) 1174-1182

    1957

  10. [10]

    Nielsen, H.B.; Olesen, P.;Vortex-line models for dual strings, Nuclear Physics B61(1973) 45-61

    1973

  11. [11]

    Fiz.24(1976) 861-870

    Bogomolny, E.B.;The stability of classical solutions, Yad. Fiz.24(1976) 861-870

    1976

  12. [12]

    Prasad, M.K.; Sommerfield, C.M.;Exact classical solution for the’t Hooft monopole and the Julia-Zee dyon, Physical Review Letters35(1975), no. 12, 760

    1975

  13. [13]

    10, 3008

    Weinberg, E.J.;Multivortex solutions of the Ginzburg-Landau equations, Physical Review D19 (1979), no. 10, 3008. 21

    1979

  14. [14]

    3, 277-292

    Taubes, C.H.;Arbitrary N-vortex solutions to the first order Ginzburg-Landau equations, Communi- cations in Mathematical Physics72(1980), no. 3, 277-292

    1980

  15. [15]

    Jaffe, A.; Taubes, C.H.;Vortices and Monopoles, Birkhduser, Boston, 1980, MR 82m,81051

    1980

  16. [16]

    1, 149- 179

    Samols, T.M.;Vortex scattering, Communications in Mathematical Physics145(1992), no. 1, 149- 179

    1992

  17. [17]

    2-3, 262-270

    Shellard, E.P.S.; Ruback, P.J.;Vortex scattering in two dimensions, Physics Letters B209(1988), no. 2-3, 262-270

    1988

  18. [18]

    3, 669-678

    Ruback, P.J.;Vortex string motion in the Abelian Higgs model, Nuclear Physics B296(1988), no. 3, 669-678

    1988

  19. [19]

    Rebbi, C.; Strilka, R.; Myers, E.;Vortex scattering in the Abelian Higgs model, Nuclear Physics B-Proceedings Supplements26(1992) 240-246

    1992

  20. [20]

    Arod´ z, H.;Bound states of the vector field with a vortex in the Abelian Higgs model, Acta Phys. Polon. B 22 (1991) 511

    1991

  21. [21]

    Goodband, M.; Hindmarsh, M.;Bound states and instabilities of vortices, Physical Review D52 (1995), no. 8, 4621

    1995

  22. [22]

    Alonso-Izquierdo, A.; Garcia-Fuertes, W.; Mateos-Guilarte, J.;Dissecting zero modes and bound states on BPS vortices in Ginzburg-Landau superconductors, Journal of High Energy Physics5 (2016) 1-36

    2016

  23. [23]

    Alonso-Izquierdo, A.; Garcia-Fuertes, W.; Mateos-Guilarte, J.;A note on BPS vortex bound states, Physics Letters B,753, (2016) 29-33

    2016

  24. [24]

    12, 125026

    Alonso-Izquierdo, A.; Miguelez-Caballero, D.;Dissecting normal modes of vibration on vortices in Ginzburg-Landau superconductors, Physical Review D110(2024), no. 12, 125026

    2024

  25. [25]

    Alonso-Izquierdo, A.; Miguelez-Caballero, D.; Queiruga, J.;Spectral structure of fluctuations around n-vortices in the Abelian-Higgs model, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena (2026) 135235

    2026

  26. [26]

    Gavrea, N.; Harland, D.; Speight, M.;Shape modes ofCP 1 vortices, arXiv:2603.21343, url=https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21343

    work page arXiv

  27. [27]

    Alonso-Izquierdo, A.; Garcia-Fuertes, W.; Manton, N.S.; Mateos-Guilarte, J.;Spectral flow of vortex shape modes over the BPS 2-vortex moduli space, Journal of High Energy Physics1(2024) 20

    2024

  28. [28]

    5, 056050

    Krusch, S.; Rees, M.; Winyard, T.;Scattering of vortices with excited normal modes, Physical Review D110(2024), no. 5, 056050

    2024

  29. [29]

    8, 085006

    Alonso-Izquierdo, A.; Manton, N.S.; Mateos Guilarte, J.; Wereszczynski, A.;Collective coordinate models for 2-vortex shape mode dynamics, Physical Review D110, (2024) no. 8, 085006

    2024

  30. [30]

    Miguelez-Caballero, D; Navarro-Obregon, S; Wereszczynski, A.;Moduli space metric of the excited vortex, Physical Review D111, (2025) 105008

    2025

  31. [31]

    6, 065004

    Alonso-Izquierdo, A.; Mateos Guilarte, J.; Rees, M.; Wereszczy´ nski, A.;Spectral wall in collisions of excited Abelian Higgs vortices, Physical Review D110(2024), no. 6, 065004

    2024

  32. [32]

    24, 241601

    Adam, C.; Oles, K.; Romanczukiewicz, T.; Wereszczynski, A.,Spectral walls in soliton collisions, Physical Review Letters 122 (2019) no. 24, 241601. 22

    2019

  33. [33]

    Alonso-Izquierdo, A.; Manton, N.S.; Mateos-Guilarte, J.; Rees, M.; Wereszczynski, A.;Dynamics of excited BPS three-vortices, Physical Review D111, (2025), no. 10

    2025

  34. [34]

    Alonso-Izquierdo, A.; Bachmaier, M.; Wereszczynski, A.;From BPS geodesics to mode-driven dynamics in the scattering of multiple BPS vortices, arXiv:2603.04495, url=https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04495

    work page arXiv

  35. [35]

    1-2, 1-32

    Campbell, D.K.; Schonfeld, J.F.; Wingate, C.A.;Resonance structure in kink-antikink interactions inφ 4 theory, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena9(1983), no. 1-2, 1-32

    1983

  36. [36]

    5, 1550-1563

    Sugiyama, T.;Kink-antikink collisions in the two-dimensionalφ 4 model, Progress of Theoretical Physics61(1979), no. 5, 1550-1563

    1979

  37. [37]

    4, 045003

    Alonso-Izquierdo, A.; Queiroga-Nunes, J.; Nieto, L.M.;Scattering between wobbling kinks, Physical Review D103(2021), no. 4, 045003

    2021

  38. [38]

    Alonso-Izquierdo, A.; Nieto, L.M.; Queiroga-Nunes, J.;Asymmetric scattering between kinks and wobblers, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation107(2022) 106183

    2022

  39. [39]

    7, 071601

    Manton, N.S.; Ole´ s, K.; Roma´ nczukiewicz, T.; Wereszczy´ nski, A.;Collective coordinate model of kink-antikink collisions inϕ 4 theory, Physical Review Letters127(2021), no. 7, 071601

    2021

  40. [40]

    Campos J.G.F.; Mohammadi A.;Wobbling double sine-Gordon kinks, JHEP09(2021) 067

    2021

  41. [41]

    Karpisek O.N.; Rafaj L.; Blaschke F.;Scattering of kinks in coreless potentials, PTEP 2024 (11) (2024) 113A01

    2024

  42. [42]

    Bachmaier, M.; Wereszczynski, A.;Resonance phenomena in vortex-antivortex collisions, Phys. Lett. B875(2026) 140324

    2026

  43. [43]

    6, 065009

    Alonso-Izquierdo, A.; Blanco-Pillado, J.J.; Migu´ elez-Caballero, D.; Navarro-Obreg´ on, S.; Queiruga, J.;Excited Abelian-Higgs vortices: Decay rate and radiation emission, Physical Review D110(2024), no. 6, 065009

    2024

  44. [44]

    Arod´ z, H.; Hadasz, L.;Radiation from an excited vortex in the Abelian Higgs model, Physical Review D54(1996), no. 6, 4004

    1996

  45. [45]

    Speight, J.M.,Static intervortex forces, Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 3830–3835

    1997

  46. [46]

    M.; Urrestilla, J.;Internal excitations of global vortices, JCAP10(2021) 047

    Blanco-Pillado, J.J.; Jimenez-Aguilar, D.; Queiruga, J. M.; Urrestilla, J.;Internal excitations of global vortices, JCAP10(2021) 047

    2021

  47. [47]

    Manton, N.;Statistical mechanics of vortices, Nucl. Phys. B400(1993) 624

    1993

  48. [48]

    B.;Vortices in holomorphic line bundles over closed Kahler manifolds, Commun

    Bradlow, S. B.;Vortices in holomorphic line bundles over closed Kahler manifolds, Commun. Math. Phys.135(1990) 1

    1990

  49. [49]

    Manton, N.;Quantum Statistical Mechanics of Vortices, J. Phys. A55(2022) 325001

    2022

  50. [50]

    Blaschke, F.; Romanczukiewicz, T.; Slawinska, K.; Wereszczynski, A.;Unified theory of oscillons and modes, arXiv:2606.22680

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    5, 055024

    Speight, M.; Winyard, T.;Short-range intervortex forces, Physical Review D112(2025), no. 5, 055024

    2025

  52. [52]

    9, 095203

    Speight, M.; Winyard, T.;Vortex lattices and critical fields in anisotropic superconductors, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical58(2025), no. 9, 095203. 23 λ= 0.5λ= 1.0λ= 1.2 η0 = 0.0 v0 vf =(vx,vy ) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 v0 vf =(vx,vy ) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 v0 vf =(vx,vy ) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4...

    2025