Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comment on "Infrared signature of the superconducting gap symmetry in iron-arsenide superconductors", Y. M. Dai et al. arXiv:1106.4430

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1106.5343 v1 pith:OZHZUTL4 submitted 2011-06-27 cond-mat.supr-con

classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords textrmarxivbkfaconductivitymattis-bardeenopticalsuperconductivitytheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Y. M. Dai et al. in their recent work arXiv:1106.4430 presented a reflectivity study of the in-plance optical conductivity of a $\textrm{Ba}_{0.6}\textrm{K}_{0.4}\textrm{Fe}_2\textrm{As}_2$ (BKFA) superconductor with $T_{\textrm{c}}\approx39K$. The single crystals used in this study are of high quality and the measurements are rather accurate. The authors analyzed the optical conductivity of BKFA in the framework of the Mattis-Bardeen theory and the BCS theory of superconductivity. This analysis, however, generates a series of severe contradictions with a large body of experimental data obtained with multiple probes as well as misuses both the Mattis-Bardeen and the BCS theories of superconductivity beyond their approximation regions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools