Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DEAL: Difficulty-aware Active Learning for Semantic Segmentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.08705 v1 pith:P237IRUM submitted 2020-10-17 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords semanticsegmentationactiveareasdealdifficultylearningbranch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Active learning aims to address the paucity of labeled data by finding the most informative samples. However, when applying to semantic segmentation, existing methods ignore the segmentation difficulty of different semantic areas, which leads to poor performance on those hard semantic areas such as tiny or slender objects. To deal with this problem, we propose a semantic Difficulty-awarE Active Learning (DEAL) network composed of two branches: the common segmentation branch and the semantic difficulty branch. For the latter branch, with the supervision of segmentation error between the segmentation result and GT, a pixel-wise probability attention module is introduced to learn the semantic difficulty scores for different semantic areas. Finally, two acquisition functions are devised to select the most valuable samples with semantic difficulty. Competitive results on semantic segmentation benchmarks demonstrate that DEAL achieves state-of-the-art active learning performance and improves the performance of the hard semantic areas in particular.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cross-Domain Semantic Segmentation with Large Language Model-Assisted Descriptor Generation

    cs.CV 2025-01 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    LangSeg claims state-of-the-art segmentation via LLM-generated descriptors, but the method section never describes the descriptor generation and the reported improvements contradict its own tables.

Pith tools