Effects of Impurity Scattering on Orbital Hall Conductivity and Orbital Transport in Ru-based Alloys

Dahai Wei; Wenqi Xu; Yanxu Chen; Yumin Yang

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Effects of Impurity Scattering on Orbital Hall Conductivity and Orbital Transport in Ru-based Alloys

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-12 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In Ru alloys, impurity scattering suppresses orbital Hall conductivity but leaves the orbital diffusion length fixed near 14 nm.

desk verdict Solid impurity-scaling experiment on Ru OHE: generation falls with alloying while λ stays ~14 nm, but the sech drift-diffusion extraction is the soft hinge. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.03076 v1 pith:P2FNHDAB submitted 2026-07-03 cond-mat.mes-hall

Yumin Yang , Yanxu Chen , Wenqi Xu , Dahai Wei This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords orbitalHalleffectdiffusionlengthimpurityscatteringRualloysspin-orbittorqueST-FMRorbitronicsdisorderscaling

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how static impurities affect the generation and travel of orbital angular momentum currents in metals, a question far less settled than the corresponding spin-Hall story. The authors grow Ru/ferromagnet bilayers and deliberately raise residual resistivity by alloying with Cu or Ti, both of which add scattering without a large spin-Hall contribution of their own. From spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance and thickness-dependent analysis they extract an effective orbital Hall conductivity and an orbital diffusion length. The conductivity stays roughly constant at low disorder and then falls once alloying exceeds about 5 at.%, while the diffusion length stays near 14 nm across the whole impurity range. That separation shows that the orbital Hall effect in polycrystalline Ru is largely intrinsic and only moderately robust, and that orbital transport is not simply limited by impurity-driven momentum scattering. Compared with earlier temperature-dependent data on the same system, the result implies that static impurities and dynamic lattice disorder act through different microscopic channels. A reader who wants efficient orbitronic materials therefore gains a concrete experimental rule: moderate resistivity can raise torque efficiency even while absolute conductivity falls, yet the transport length itself is not an impurity knob.

What carries the argument

Thickness-dependent drift-diffusion fit of the electric-field-normalized damping-like SOT efficiency, ξ_DL^E = σ_OH^eff (1 − sech(t_NM/λ_NM)) + ξ_DL,0^E, which separates the effective orbital Hall conductivity from the orbital diffusion length.

What would settle it

A thickness series on the same Ru alloys in which an independent probe (for example THz emission or a different FM stack) yields a diffusion length that shortens systematically with residual resistivity, or in which the low-concentration conductivity remains flat only when the alloy is shown by composition analysis to carry a sizable spin-Hall term.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The orbital Hall effect in polycrystalline Ru is dominated by an intrinsic mechanism that is moderately robust against weak disorder but is suppressed by stronger alloy disorder once the impurity concentration reaches roughly 5 at.%. At the same time the orbital diffusion length remains nearly constant at approximately 14 nm across both the Cu- and Ti-alloyed series, showing that orbital transport in this metallic regime is not governed simply by impurity-limited momentum scattering.

Load-bearing premise

The measured thickness series of damping-like torque is assumed to be produced by bulk orbital current that obeys the same simple drift-diffusion form used for spin, with negligible residual spin Hall, interfacial, or current-distribution contributions from the Cu or Ti alloys.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Orbitronic device design can treat generation efficiency and transport length as separately tunable: impurity level mainly sets σ_OH^eff while λ_NM stays fixed near 14 nm in Ru-based films.
Moderate alloying that raises resistivity can still improve the effective orbital Hall angle even after σ_OH^eff begins to fall, offering a practical lever for torque efficiency.
Static impurity disorder and phonon disorder must be treated as distinct channels when modeling orbital relaxation; temperature and alloying data cannot be collapsed onto a single scattering-time picture.
The stronger disorder sensitivity of Ru OHE relative to Pt SHE implies that orbital-texture materials require tighter impurity control than strong-SOC spin-Hall metals if the intrinsic response is to be preserved.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the extended-wave-packet picture is correct, host metals whose orbital texture is more spatially delocalized should show even weaker impurity dependence of λ_NM, giving a materials-selection rule beyond Ru.
The same alloying protocol applied to light 3d metals that already show large OHE would test whether the ~5 at.% suppression threshold is universal or Ru-specific.
Interface engineering that selectively couples to phonon-mediated orbital transfer could raise torque without the conductivity penalty of bulk alloying.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The new result is clean experimental impurity scaling of orbital generation versus transport in a weak-SHE host. Two alloy series (Ru-Cu, Ru-Ti) plus pure Ru, thickness-dependent ST-FMR, and a drift-diffusion fit give σ_OH^eff that holds under weak disorder then drops above ~5 at.%, while λ_NM stays ~12–16 nm (collapse ~14.4 nm). That generation-transport split, plus the contrast to their earlier phonon/temperature work, is the real addition relative to pure-metal OHE reports and theory papers on disorder.

What they do well: linear conductance vs t_NM rules out strong current gradients; both alloy series give the same qualitative pattern; angular ST-FMR and RF-current calibration are described carefully; residual vs phonon resistivity is separated; and they compare honestly to Pt SHE scaling and to disordered Mn. The claim that polycrystalline Ru OHE is mostly intrinsic and more disorder-sensitive than Pt SHE is a fair reading of the data they show.

Soft spots, in proportion: the central separation rests on Eq. (3), the spin-like sech form. Free three-parameter fits scatter, so they fix λ from the normalized collapse and re-extract σ_OH^eff. That is mild circularity, not fatal, but it means the impurity-insensitivity of λ is only as good as the assumption that bulk orbital generation + constant interface conversion dominate and that Cu/Ti add negligible SHE or interface changes. Composition control for dilute Cu is admittedly noisy. The “extended itinerant wave packet” picture is interpretive, not measured. None of that overturns the data pattern; it just caps how hard you should lean on “λ is impurity-immune.”

This is for people working on orbitronic materials and orbital vs spin relaxation. Math and citations look standard and adequate; no load-bearing contradiction. I would send it to referees—tighten error bars, free vs fixed-λ comparison, and the orbital-dominance checks—and I would cite the scaling result when discussing disorder in OHE. Worth reading and engaging.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript studies how static impurity scattering affects orbital-current generation and transport in polycrystalline Ru by alloying with Cu or Ti in Ru-based NM/FM bilayers. Using ST-FMR and thickness-dependent analysis of the electric-field-normalized damping-like SOT efficiency, the authors fit a drift-diffusion form (Eq. 3) to extract an effective orbital Hall conductivity σ_OH^eff and an orbital diffusion length λ_NM. They report that σ_OH^eff is only weakly affected at low disorder but drops once alloy concentration exceeds ~5 at.%, while λ_NM remains ~12–16 nm (near 14 nm) across both alloy series and residual resistivities. From this they conclude that the OHE in Ru is largely intrinsic and moderately disorder-robust, that orbital transport is not simply impurity-limited, and that static impurities and dynamic (phonon) disorder act through distinct channels when compared with prior temperature-dependent Ru/Co data.

Significance. If the separation of generation from transport holds, the work supplies a useful experimental constraint for orbitronics: impurity scattering can suppress orbital Hall generation without shortening the orbital diffusion length in a high-conductivity metallic regime. The dual Cu/Ti alloy series, linear conductance–thickness checks, careful ST-FMR calibration and angular analysis, and the explicit comparison to temperature-dependent measurements are genuine strengths and go beyond single-composition orbital-torque reports. The result would guide alloy design for orbitronic materials and sharpen the distinction between OAM and spin relaxation. The significance is therefore real but rests on the validity of the spin-like thickness model and on the assumption that interface conversion does not track alloying—points that need tighter support before the central claim can be taken as established.

major comments (4)

[Sec. III.C, Eq. (3)] Sec. III.C, Eq. (3): The central claim that λ_NM is impurity-insensitive while σ_OH^eff falls is obtained by fitting ξ_DL^E(t_NM) to the spin-like form σ_OH^eff(1−sech(t_NM/λ_NM))+ξ_DL,0^E. The paper itself stresses that OAM and spin have distinct microscopic natures and that static vs dynamic disorder act differently, yet the extraction still assumes a single bulk generation length and a sech-shaped orbital profile. The authors should state the conditions under which this form remains valid for orbital currents, discuss alternative profiles (ballistic, multi-channel, hotspot-mediated), and show whether those alternatives could produce an apparently constant λ_NM while generation falls. Without that, the claimed separation of generation from transport is model-dependent rather than model-independent.
[Sec. III.C–D] Sec. III.C–D: The analysis treats interface orbital-to-spin conversion and the zero-thickness offset ξ_DL,0^E as independent of alloy species and residual resistivity. Alloying can change interface transparency, roughness, hybridization, and current partitioning into Co. Part of the reported drop in σ_OH^eff could therefore be interfacial rather than bulk generation. Independent interface characterization (e.g., XRR/TEM, interface-sensitive magnetometry, or FM-thickness series at fixed NM) or a quantitative bound on how much ξ_DL,0^E and conversion efficiency may vary with x is needed to keep the bulk-generation interpretation load-bearing.
[Sec. III.D, Fig. 4a–b] Sec. III.D, Fig. 4a–b: Free three-parameter fits are said to scatter, so λ_NM is fixed at 14.4 nm from the normalized collapse (Fig. 3c) before reporting the σ_OH^eff scaling. That procedure partly enforces the impurity-insensitivity of λ_NM that is then claimed as a result. Free-fit λ_NM values with uncertainties (and the corresponding free-fit σ_OH^eff) should be the primary published result, with the fixed-λ analysis secondary. The Supplemental trend alone is not sufficient if the main-text claim is that λ_NM is nearly constant.
[Sec. II, III.A–B] Sec. II and III.A–B: Residual SHE from Cu/Ti (and any alloy-induced change in Ru SHE) is argued to be weak by citation, but no quantitative bound is given for the present films (e.g., estimated σ_SH upper limits vs measured σ_OH^eff, or control stacks). Because the entire orbital interpretation rests on SHE remaining negligible after alloying, a short quantitative estimate or control measurement should be added so that residual spin contributions cannot account for the thickness series or their alloy dependence.

minor comments (5)

[Sec. II] Sec. II: The sentence “thusi 0.1at.% impurity level is not necessary” is unclear and should be rewritten to state what impurity range is actually controlled and why dilute doping was not pursued.
[Fig. 1, Sec. III.A] Fig. 1 and Sec. III.A: Nominal Cu concentrations are noted as uncertain at low sputtering power; actual compositions (EDS/XPS/RBS) should be reported if available, or the uncertainty should be quantified on the x-axis of the scaling plots.
[Fig. 4d] Fig. 4d and related text: The “extended itinerant orbital wave packet” picture is illustrative only; it should be clearly labeled as a schematic hypothesis, not as a conclusion supported by the present data.
Throughout: Minor grammar and phrasing issues (e.g., “According to SOT measurement and thickness-dependent…”; “not governed simply by an impurity scattering”) should be cleaned for readability.
[Eq. (1)–(2)] Eq. (1)–(2): Define all symbols at first use in the main text (including units of ξ_DL^E and how E is obtained from I_RF, R_0, and device length) so the efficiency extraction is fully reproducible from the main text alone.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Main alloy thickness series are independent data; only mild circularity from fixing λ_NM on the same collapse then re-extracting σ_OH^eff, plus non-load-bearing self-citation to the authors’ temperature study.

fitted input called prediction [Sec. III.D / Fig. 3c → Fig. 4b]
"Because the full three-parameter fits produce larger scatter owing to experimental uncertainty, we also refit the thickness-dependent data with λ_NM fixed at 14.4 nm, as suggested by the normalized diffusion profile in Fig. 3c. In this procedure, only σ_OH^eff and ξ_DL,0^E are varied to fit the t_NM dependence of ξ_DL^E. The resulting σ_OH^eff is shown in Fig. 4b"

λ_NM = 14.4 nm is taken from the normalized collapse of the same ξ_DL^E(t_NM) series that are then re-fit for σ_OH^eff. With λ fixed, the published generation-vs-conductivity scaling is partly forced by that constraint rather than by fully independent free fits of generation and transport. The paper notes free-fit Supplemental values show the same trend, so this is mild constrained re-use, not full definitional circularity.
self citation load bearing [Abstract; Sec. III.D (comparison paragraph); Ref. [40]]
"Together with previous temperature-dependent measurements, our results show that static impurities and dynamic lattice disorder affect orbital transport through distinct microscopic channels. ... this impurity-scaling behavior is qualitatively different from our previous temperature-dependent Ru/Co measurements [40]. In that case, reducing phonon scattering at low temperature enhanced both the damping-like efficiency and the fitted orbital diffusion length"

The claim that static vs dynamic disorder act through distinct channels is not established by the alloy series alone; it is completed by contrasting the present impurity-insensitive λ_NM with the authors’ own prior temperature-dependent Ru/Co result [40]. That self-citation is load-bearing only for the comparative “distinct channels” interpretation, not for the primary finding that alloy disorder suppresses σ_OH^eff while leaving λ_NM ~14 nm.

full rationale

The central experimental chain is not circular. Resistivity, ST-FMR H_DL, and ξ_DL^E(t_NM) are measured independently for pure Ru and Ru–Cu/Ti alloys; free three-parameter drift-diffusion fits already give λ_NM ≈ 12–16 nm with σ_OH^eff falling above ~5 at.% impurity. That is ordinary parameter extraction from new data, not a prediction forced by its inputs. Two mild issues remain. (1) Because free fits scatter, the authors collapse the normalized thickness curves, fix λ_NM = 14.4 nm from that same collapse, and re-fit only σ_OH^eff for the published scaling plot (Fig. 4b). This is a constrained re-use of the same thickness series, so generation and transport are not fully independently determined in the figure that carries the scaling claim—though the paper states the free-fit Supplemental values show the same trend, so the reduction is partial rather than definitional. (2) The interpretive claim that static impurities and dynamic lattice disorder act through distinct channels rests on comparison to the authors’ own prior Ru/Co temperature study [40]; that self-citation is not required for the impurity-series result itself. The spin-like sech drift-diffusion form (Eq. 3) is an external modeling assumption whose validity for OAM is a correctness risk, not a circularity of derivation. Overall score 2: independent alloy data carry the main claim; circularity is limited to a constrained re-fit and a non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard spintronics measurement practice plus the assumption that orbital transport can be parameterized by the same drift-diffusion form used for spin, with Ru’s weak SHE and Cu/Ti’s weak SHE isolating orbital contributions. Free parameters are the per-series fitted σ_OH^eff, λ_NM (or the fixed 14.4 nm), and interfacial offset. No new particles or forces are invented; the ‘extended orbital wave packet’ is an interpretive sketch, not a required entity.

free parameters (5)

orbital diffusion length λ_NM (or fixed 14.4 nm)
Extracted from thickness dependence of ξ_DL^E via Eq. 3; later fixed at 14.4 nm from the normalized collapse to reduce scatter when reporting σ_OH^eff.
effective orbital Hall conductivity σ_OH^eff (per alloy)
Amplitude parameter in the drift-diffusion fit; primary reported measure of orbital-current generation efficiency.
zero-thickness offset ξ_DL,0^E
Accounts for self-torque and interfacial contributions in Eq. 3; co-fitted with generation/transport parameters.
nominal alloy concentrations x (Cu, Ti)
Set by co-sputtering powers; authors note Cu concentration is uncertain at low power, so the disorder axis is only approximately controlled.
residual vs phonon resistivity split (ρ_imp, ρ_phon)
From Matthiessen-style decomposition of ρ(T); used as the impurity-scattering axis in Fig. 4a.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Damping-like torque thickness dependence follows the orbital drift-diffusion form of Eq. 3, analogous to spin diffusion.
Invoked in Sec. III.C to separate σ_OH^eff from λ_NM; not derived from orbital-specific Boltzmann theory in this paper.
domain assumption Ru has negligible SHE and Cu/Ti add negligible spin Hall contributions, so measured DL torque is orbital-dominated.
Stated in Introduction and Methods with citations [34–37]; load-bearing for calling the extracted conductivity ‘orbital Hall’.
domain assumption Matthiessen’s rule approximately separates residual impurity resistivity from phonon-related resistivity.
Used in Sec. III.A / Fig. 1c–d; authors themselves note possible breakdown in the strongly disordered regime.
domain assumption ST-FMR symmetric Lorentzian component yields the damping-like effective field H_DL via Eq. 1 after RF current and ΔR calibration.
Standard ST-FMR analysis [38,39]; systematic errors in I_RF or M_eff would rescale all efficiencies.
domain assumption NM resistivity is thickness-independent over the studied range (linear conductance vs t_NM).
Sec. III.A; used to exclude current-density-gradient / vorticity artifacts as the torque source.

invented entities (1)

extended itinerant orbital wave packet carrying OAM
purpose: Heuristic picture (Fig. 4d) to explain why λ_NM is robust against local impurities while resistivity rises.
Interpretive sketch only; not required for the data reduction and has no independent mass/signature prediction in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effects of Impurity Scattering on Orbital Hall Conductivity and Orbital Transport in Ru-based Alloys." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P2FNHDAB

@misc{pith2026260703076,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effects of Impurity Scattering on Orbital Hall Conductivity and Orbital Transport in Ru-based Alloys},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P2FNHDAB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.03076}
}

read the original abstract

The role of impurity scattering in the generation and transport of orbital current remains less established than in conventional spin Hall systems. Here we investigate Ru-based nonmagnet/ferromagnet bilayers in which the impurity scattering is tuned by Cu or Ti alloying. According to SOT measurement and thickness-dependent drift-diffusion analysis, we extract the effective orbital Hall conductivity and the orbital diffusion length. We find that the orbital Hall effect in polycrystalline Ru is dominated by intrinsic mechanism that is moderately robust against weak disorder but suppressed by stronger alloy disorder. However, the orbital diffusion length remains nearly unchanged at approximately 14 nm over the investigated impurity range. This behavior indicates that orbital transport is not governed simply by an impurity scattering. Together with previous temperature-dependent measurements, our results show that static impurities and dynamic lattice disorder affect orbital transport through distinct microscopic channels. These results provide new insight into how disorder governs orbital generation and transport, and offer experimental guidance for developing high-efficient orbitronic materials.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references

[1]

Fukami, K.-J

S. Fukami, K.-J. Lee, and M. Kläui, Challenges and opportunities in orbitronics, Nat. Phys. 1 (2025)

2025
[2]

Kim and Y

J. Kim and Y . Otani, Orbital angular momentum for spintronics, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 563, 169974 (2022)

2022
[3]

Tanaka, H

T. Tanaka, H. Kontani, M. Naito, T. Naito, D. S. Hirashima, K. Yamada, and J. Inoue, Intrinsic spin Hall effect and orbital Hall effect in 4d and 5d transition metals, Phys. Rev. B 77, 165117 (2008)

2008
[4]

Kontani, T

H. Kontani, T. Tanaka, D. S. Hirashima, K. Yamada, and J. Inoue, Giant Orbital Hall Effect in Transition Metals: Origin of Large Spin and Anomalous Hall Effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 016601 (2009)

2009
[5]

D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H.-W. Lee, Intrinsic Spin and Orbital Hall Effects from Orbital Texture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602 (2018)

2018
[6]

D. Jo, D. Go, and H. -W. Lee, Gigantic intrinsic orbital Hall effects in weakly spin -orbit coupled metals, Phys. Rev. B 98, 214405 (2018)

2018
[7]

Go and H.-W

D. Go and H.-W. Lee, Orbital torque: Torque generation by orbital current injection, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 013177 (2020)

2020
[8]

D. Go, F. Freimuth, J.-P. Hanke, F. Xue, O. Gomonay, K.-J. Lee, S. Blügel, P. M. Haney, H.-W. Lee, and Y . Mokrousov, Theory of current -induced angular momentum transfer dynamics in spin-orbit coupled systems, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033401 (2020)

2020

Show all 43 references

[9]

Lee et al., Orbital torque in magnetic bilayers, Nat

D. Lee et al., Orbital torque in magnetic bilayers, Nat. Commun. 12, 6710 (2021)

2021
[10]

Gupta et al., Harnessing orbital Hall effect in spin-orbit torque MRAM, Nat Commun 16, 130 (2025)

R. Gupta et al., Harnessing orbital Hall effect in spin-orbit torque MRAM, Nat Commun 16, 130 (2025)

2025
[11]

Salemi and P

L. Salemi and P. M. Oppeneer, First-principles theory of intrinsic spin and orbital Hall and Nernst effects in metallic monoatomic crystals, Phys. Rev. Materials 6, 095001 (2022)

2022
[12]

Tang and G

P. Tang and G. E. W. Bauer, Role of Disorder in the Intrinsic Orbital Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 186302 (2024)

2024
[13]

Veneri, T

A. Veneri, T. G. Rappoport, and A. Ferreira, Extrinsic Orbital Hall Effect: Orbital Skew Scattering and Crossover between Diffusive and Intrinsic Orbital Transport, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 136201 (2025)

2025
[14]

V . V . Kabanov and A. V . Shumilin, Impact of the impurity symmetry on orbital momentum relaxation and orbital Hall effect studied by the quantum Boltzmann equation, Phys. Rev. B 110, 235161 (2024)

2024
[15]

F. Liu, B. Liang, J. Xu, C. Jia, and C. Jiang, Giant efficiency of long-range orbital torque in Co/Nb bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 107, 054404 (2023)

2023
[16]

Hayashi, D

H. Hayashi, D. Jo, D. Go, T. Gao, S. Haku, Y . Mokrousov, H. -W. Lee, and K. Ando, Observation of long-range orbital transport and giant orbital torque, Commun. Phys. 6, 32 (2023)

2023
[17]

Y.-G. Choi, D. Jo, K. -H. Ko, D. Go, K. -H. Kim, H. G. Park, C. Kim, B. -C. Min, G.-M. Choi, and H.-W. Lee, Observation of the orbital Hall effect in a light metal Ti, Nature 619, 52 (2023)

2023
[18]

Fukunaga, S

R. Fukunaga, S. Haku, H. Hayashi, and K. Ando, Orbital torque originating from orbital Hall effect in Zr, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023054 (2023)

2023
[19]

Moriya, M

H. Moriya, M. Taniguchi, D. Jo, D. Go, N. Soya, H. Hayashi, Y . Mokrousov, H.-W. Lee, and K. Ando, Observation of Long-Range Current-Induced Torque in Ni/Pt Bilayers, Nano Lett. 24, 6459 (2024)

2024
[20]

W. Lv, B. Zhang, B. Kang, Y . Wan, S. Tao, W. Jiang, F. Zheng, X. Liu, and J. Cao, Orbital torque effect in Mo-based magnetic heterostructures, Appl. Phys. Lett. 128, 192402 (2026)

2026
[21]

Mankovsky and H

S. Mankovsky and H. Ebert, Spin and orbital hall effect in nonmagnetic transition metals: extrinsic versus intrinsic contributions, Phys. Rev. B 110, 184417 (2024)

2024
[22]

D. Go, D. Jo, K. -W. Kim, S. Lee, M.-G. Kang, B.-G. Park, S. Blügel, H.-W. Lee, and Y . Mokrousov, Long-Range Orbital Torque by Momentum-Space Hotspots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 246701 (2023)

2023
[23]

T. S. Seifert, D. Go, H. Hayashi, R. Rouzegar, F. Freimuth, K. Ando, Y . Mokrousov, and T. Kampfrath, Time-domain observation of ballistic orbital -angular-momentum currents with giant relaxation length in tungsten, Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 1132 (2023)

2023
[24]

S. S. Mishra, J. Lourembam, D. J. X. Lin, and R. Singh, Active ballistic orbital transport in Ni/Pt heterostructure, Nat Commun 15, 4568 (2024)

2024
[25]

G. Sala, H. Wang, W. Legrand, and P. Gambardella, Orbital Hanle Magnetoresistance in a 3d Transition Metal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 156703 (2023)

2023
[26]

T. Guan, J. Liu, W. Qin, Y . Cui, S. Wang, Y . Wu, and Z. Tao, Evidences of subnanometre orbital diffusion length in heavy metals using terahertz emission spectroscopy, Nat. Nanotechnol. 21, 538 (2026)

2026
[27]

Rang and P

M. Rang and P. J. Kelly, Orbital relaxation length from first -principles scattering calculations, Phys. Rev. B 109, 214427 (2024)

2024
[28]

J. Sohn, J. M. Lee, and H. -W. Lee, Dyakonov-perel-like orbital and spin relaxations in centrosymmetric systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 246301 (2024)

2024
[29]

Peng et al., Unconventional scaling of the orbital Hall effect, Nat

S. Peng et al., Unconventional scaling of the orbital Hall effect, Nat. Mater. 24, 1749 (2025)

2025
[30]

L. Zhu, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Maximizing spin-orbit torque generated by the spin Hall effect of Pt, Applied Physics Reviews 8, 031308 (2021)

2021
[31]

Nguyen, D

M.-H. Nguyen, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Spin Torque Study of the Spin Hall Conductivity and Spin Diffusion Length in Platinum Thin Films with Varying Resistivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 126601 (2016)

2016
[32]

Y . Yang, Z. Xie, Z. Zhao, N. Lei, J. Zhao, and D. Wei, Harnessing synergy of spin and orbital currents in heavy metal/ferromagnet multilayers, Commun Phys 7, 336 (2024)

2024
[33]

Y . Yang, W. Xu, Z. Xie, N. Lei, J. Zhao, and D. Wei, Revealing interfacial orbital transport in nonmagnet/ferromagnet bilayers by the absence of orbital hall magnetoresistance, Chin. Phys. Lett. (2026)

2026
[34]

Behera, M

N. Behera, M. S. Singh, S. Chaudhary, D. K. Pandya, and P. K. Muduli, Effect of Ru thickness on spin pumping in Ru/Py bilayer, J. Appl. Phys. 117, (2015)

2015
[35]

Niimi, M

Y . Niimi, M. Morota, D. H. Wei, C. Deranlot, M. Basletic, A. Hamzic, A. Fert, and Y . Otani, Extrinsic Spin Hall Effect Induced by Iridium Impurities in Copper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 126601 (2011)

2011
[36]

Niimi, Y

Y . Niimi, Y . Kawanishi, D. H. Wei, C. Deranlot, H. X. Yang, M. Chshiev, T. Valet, A. Fert, and Y . Otani, Giant Spin Hall Effect Induced by Skew Scattering from Bismuth Impurities inside Thin Film CuBi Alloys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 156602 (2012)

2012
[37]

C. Du, H. Wang, F. Yang, and P. C. Hammel, Systematic variation of spin-orbit coupling with d-orbital filling: Large inverse spin Hall effect in 3d transition metals, Phys. Rev. B 90, 140407 (2014)

2014
[38]

Karimeddiny, J

S. Karimeddiny, J. A. Mittelstaedt, R. A. Buhrman, and D. C. Ralph, Transverse and Longitudinal Spin-Torque Ferromagnetic Resonance for Improved Measurement of Spin- Orbit Torque, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 024024 (2020)

2020
[39]

Nan et al., Controlling spin current polarization through non -collinear antiferromagnetism, Nat Commun 11, 4671 (2020)

T. Nan et al., Controlling spin current polarization through non -collinear antiferromagnetism, Nat Commun 11, 4671 (2020)

2020
[40]

W. Xu, Y . Yang, Y . Zhang, G. Meng, Z. Xie, and D. Wei, Temperature-dependent orbital torque in Ru/Co bilayers, Appl. Phys. Lett. 128, 172402 (2026)

2026
[41]

Urazhdin, Symmetry constraints on orbital transport in solids, Phys

S. Urazhdin, Symmetry constraints on orbital transport in solids, Phys. Rev. B 108, L180404 (2023)

2023
[42]

Han, H.-W

S. Han, H.-W. Lee, and K.-W. Kim, Orbital Dynamics in Centrosymmetric Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 176601 (2022)

2022
[43]

S. Han, H. -W. Ko, J. H. Oh, H. -W. Lee, K. -J. Lee, and K. -W. Kim, Orbital Pumping Incorporating Both Orbital Angular Momentum and Position, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 036305 (2025)

2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Fukami, K.-J

S. Fukami, K.-J. Lee, and M. Kläui, Challenges and opportunities in orbitronics, Nat. Phys. 1 (2025)

2025

[2] [2]

Kim and Y

J. Kim and Y . Otani, Orbital angular momentum for spintronics, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 563, 169974 (2022)

2022

[3] [3]

Tanaka, H

T. Tanaka, H. Kontani, M. Naito, T. Naito, D. S. Hirashima, K. Yamada, and J. Inoue, Intrinsic spin Hall effect and orbital Hall effect in 4d and 5d transition metals, Phys. Rev. B 77, 165117 (2008)

2008

[4] [4]

Kontani, T

H. Kontani, T. Tanaka, D. S. Hirashima, K. Yamada, and J. Inoue, Giant Orbital Hall Effect in Transition Metals: Origin of Large Spin and Anomalous Hall Effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 016601 (2009)

2009

[5] [5]

D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H.-W. Lee, Intrinsic Spin and Orbital Hall Effects from Orbital Texture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602 (2018)

2018

[6] [6]

D. Jo, D. Go, and H. -W. Lee, Gigantic intrinsic orbital Hall effects in weakly spin -orbit coupled metals, Phys. Rev. B 98, 214405 (2018)

2018

[7] [7]

Go and H.-W

D. Go and H.-W. Lee, Orbital torque: Torque generation by orbital current injection, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 013177 (2020)

2020

[8] [8]

D. Go, F. Freimuth, J.-P. Hanke, F. Xue, O. Gomonay, K.-J. Lee, S. Blügel, P. M. Haney, H.-W. Lee, and Y . Mokrousov, Theory of current -induced angular momentum transfer dynamics in spin-orbit coupled systems, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033401 (2020)

2020