Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Riemannian Optimization on Relaxed Indicator Matrix Manifold

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.20505 v2 pith:P2GIAUCS submitted 2025-03-26 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords manifoldindicatormatrixmethodsoptimizationriemanniandoubleincluding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The indicator matrix plays an important role in machine learning, but optimizing it is an NP-hard problem. We propose a new relaxation of the indicator matrix and prove that this relaxation forms a manifold, which we call the Relaxed Indicator Matrix Manifold (RIM manifold). Based on Riemannian geometry, we develop a Riemannian toolbox for optimization on the RIM manifold. Specifically, we provide several methods of Retraction, including a fast Retraction method to obtain geodesics. We point out that the RIM manifold is a generalization of the double stochastic manifold, and it is much faster than existing methods on the double stochastic manifold, which has a complexity of \( \mathcal{O}(n^3) \), while RIM manifold optimization is \( \mathcal{O}(n) \) and often yields better results. We conducted extensive experiments, including image denoising, with millions of variables to support our conclusion, and applied the RIM manifold to Ratio Cut, we provide a rigorous convergence proof and achieve clustering results that outperform the state-of-the-art methods. Our Code in \href{https://github.com/Yuan-Jinghui/Riemannian-Optimization-on-Relaxed-Indicator-Matrix-Manifold}{here}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. In-situ Autoguidance: Eliciting Self-Correction in Diffusion Models

    cs.LG 2025-10 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    On ImageNet 512, dropout-based self-guidance yields FID 2.57 vs 2.56 unguided and FDDINOv2 90.05 vs 68.64, providing no evidence of the claimed guidance benefit.

  2. Hadamard-Riemannian Optimization for Margin-Variance Ensemble

    cs.LG 2025-09 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    An ensemble weight-learning method that penalizes margin variance and optimizes on the unit sphere, with a flawed equivalence theorem and test-set-tuned hyperparameters.

Pith tools