Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 71 references

Unidirectional Dark-to-Bright Rescue in Cavity-Coupled Quantum Transport

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Off-diagonal exciton–phonon coupling opens a one-way dark-to-bright rescue channel whose rate is independent of the emitter count.

desk verdict Genuine new rescue channel with a clean sum-rule argument, but the headline size-independence rests on a flat-bath approximation that will not survive structured spectral densities at large N. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05312 v1 pith:P3HVHZNW submitted 2026-08-05 quant-ph

Jack Diab , Arpit Arora , Taylor L. Patti , Prineha Narang This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph PACS 42.50.Pq71.36.+c
keywords polaritontransportdarkstatesnon-Condoncouplingcavityquantumelectrodynamicsenvironment-assistedLindbladmasterequationphotonicweightHerzberg-Tellerpolaritons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the off-diagonal (non-Condon) part of the exciton–phonon coupling creates a strictly one-way relaxation channel from the dark manifold into the bright cavity state in a Tavis–Cummings array. Because dark eigenstates carry zero photonic weight, transitions into them vanish, while the photonic-weight sum rule fixes the total dark-to-bright escape rate at $\gamma_{\mathrm{rec}} = 2J(\Delta)$, independent of the number of emitters $N$. If correct, cavity-coupled transport no longer degrades as the dark manifold grows: the dark population decays single-exponentially and the drained efficiency approaches unity at every system size. The paper also identifies four observable signatures that distinguish this valve from dephasing-based environment-assisted transport.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the non-Condon spectral density $J(\omega) = (\pi/2)\sum_k |\lambda_k^{(o)}|^2 \delta(\omega-\omega_k)$, which enters the rates $\gamma^{\mathrm{em}} = 2J(\Delta)[1+n_{\Delta,T}]$ and $\gamma^{\mathrm{abs}} = 2J(\Delta) n_{\Delta,T}$. At $T=0$ the absorption channel switches off and the dissipator reduces to the single jump operator $\hat{L}_{\mathrm{rec},i}=\sqrt{\gamma_{\mathrm{rec}}}\,|\mathrm{cav}\rangle\langle i|$ with $\gamma_{\mathrm{rec}}=2J(\Delta)$. The argument then runs on the photonic-weight sum rule: transitions into a dark state vanish because $w_k=0$, and the escape rate from any dark state is pinned to $\gamma_{\mathrm{rec}}$ because the bright states carry total weight one.

What would settle it

A time-resolved photoluminescence or transient-absorption experiment on arrays with $N$ from about 4 to 64 could test the claim: if the dark-state decay time grows with $N$, or the decay is not single-exponential, or the extracted escape rate $\gamma_{\mathrm{rec}}$ changes when the detuning is moved across a phonon mode in a way not captured by $2J(\Delta)$, the unidirectional-valve picture would be contradicted. In particular, measuring the escape rate for two different dark states with the same detuning but different energies within a structured spectral density would reveal whether the sum-rule collapse holds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the non-Condon (transition-dipole-modulating) exciton–phonon coupling, treated in a Born–Markov rotating-wave approximation, produces the jump operator $\hat{L}_{\mathrm{rec},i} = \sqrt{\gamma_{\mathrm{rec}}} |\mathrm{cav}\rangle\langle i|$ at zero temperature. In the eigenbasis the secular rate is $W_{k\leftarrow l} = \gamma_{\mathrm{rec}} w_k (1-w_l)$, where $w_k$ is the cavity weight of eigenstate $k$; since $w_k=0$ for all $N-1$ dark states, the reverse transitions are identically zero and the total rate out of any dark state is $\sum_{k\in B} \gamma_{\mathrm{rec}} w_k = \gamma_{\mathrm{rec}}$ by the sum rule. The paper shows this unidirectionality survives in the full Redfield tensor, not just the secular site-basis reduction, and that in the cavity-drain configuration it yields transport efficiency $\eta \to 1$ on a timescale set by $\max(\gamma_{\mathrm{rec}}^{-1}, \gamma_{\mathrm{lead}}^{-1})$ with no residual $N$ dependence.

Load-bearing premise

The size-independent rescue rate assumes the non-Condon spectral density is nearly flat on the scale of the polariton splittings, so the site-basis Lindblad collapse is valid, and that dark states have essentially zero photonic weight.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In cavity-drain transport, the dark manifold is evacuated at rate $\gamma_{\mathrm{rec}}$ regardless of $N$, so the transport efficiency reaches near unity for any array size, whereas dephasing-only transport leaves a dark plateau that grows with $N$.
  • The same photonic-weight argument predicts four signatures: single-exponential dark-state decay, a size-scaling efficiency gap, temperature dependence set by detailed balance with crossover at $k_B T/\Delta \sim 1$, and resonant enhancement of $\gamma_{\mathrm{rec}}$ when the detuning matches a vibrational bath mode.
  • At finite temperature the absorption channel reappears with ratio $\gamma^{\mathrm{abs}}/\gamma^{\mathrm{rec}} = e^{-\Delta/k_B T}$, refilling the dark manifold and degrading the valve; the crossover temperature for molecular polariton detunings of tens of meV is around 100 K.
  • The unidirectional property is robust to the secular approximation: the full Redfield tensor has $w_k$ prefactors on every transition, so transitions into dark states vanish identically at $T=0$ for any bath spectral density.
  • The rescue advantage is specific to the cavity-drain geometry; with a site-$N$ drain, dephasing slightly outperforms rescue at the peak, as the paper's parameter sweep shows.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is generic, it turns the dark manifold from a liability into a resource: engineered spectral densities $J(\omega)$ with peaks at chosen detunings would allow targeted, size-independent extraction, which could be exploited in light-harvesting and dissipation-based quantum control.
  • The same unidirectional structure may apply beyond single-excitation transport to finite pumping and multi-excitation manifolds, where the photonic-weight prefactor would still suppress transitions into dark configurations.
  • A natural experimental extension is to cold-atom cavity-QED arrays where $\gamma_{\mathrm{rec}}$, $\gamma_{\mathrm{deph}}$, and $N$ are independently tunable, allowing a direct test of the $N$-independent decay before moving to molecular systems.
  • In structured molecular baths where the spectral density is not flat, the paper's own validity condition suggests the size independence will fail progressively; measuring $J(\omega)$ independently would let one predict the $N$ at which the rescue rate starts to drift.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper considers N two-level emitters coupled to a single cavity mode and to a phonon bath, and identifies a non-Condon (off-diagonal) exciton-phonon coupling that modulates the light-matter coupling. In the zero-temperature, single-excitation limit this yields a jump operator L_rec,i = sqrt(gamma_rec)|cav><i|, whose eigenbasis transition rates are W_{k<-l} = gamma_rec w_k (1 - w_l). Because dark states have zero photonic weight in the clean uniform-coupling limit, transitions into dark states vanish and the total escape rate out of any dark state equals gamma_rec, independent of N. The authors support this claim with a Born-Markov/Redfield derivation in the Supplemental Material, closed-form rate equations, direct Lindblad propagation in cavity-drain and site-drain geometries, a QCLE benchmark, and four proposed experimental signatures: single-exponential dark decay, a size-scaling efficiency gap, a detailed-balance temperature crossover, and resonant enhancement of the rescue rate at vibrational modes.

Significance. If the central reduction is valid, the paper identifies a genuinely new mechanism: a unidirectional dark-to-bright valve protected by a photonic-weight sum rule, structurally distinct from the bidirectional dark-bright exchange of standard ENAQT. The derivation of Eq. (4) from the site-basis Lindblad model is clean, the photonic-weight sum rule is exact in the clean limit, and the paper offers concrete falsifiable predictions with clear experimental discriminators. The authors also provide reproducible numerical infrastructure, disorder-averaged Lindblad simulations, closed-form two-exponential fits, and an independent QCLE consistency check. The main caveat is that the headline size-independence rests on a flat-spectral-density reduction whose validity is marginal even at the parameters used in the main text; because the numerics assume that reduction, the size-scaling plots do not by themselves establish the claim for structured phonon baths.

major comments (3)
  1. [SM Eqs. (S6)-(S8); main-text Eq. (4), Figs. 1(c) and 2] The headline result that the total dark escape rate is exactly gamma_rec and independent of N is obtained only after replacing the Redfield rates J_i(omega_lk) by J_i(Delta) in the eigenbasis Redfield tensor. Without that replacement, the rate from a dark state l to a bright state k carries J(E_l-E_k), so the summed escape rate depends on the bright-state energy distribution and, through the polariton splitting sqrt(N) g, on N. The paper's own validity condition, SM Eq. (S8), is described as marginal at N=6 (cutoff ~5 meV) and becomes harder to satisfy as N grows to 96, where sqrt(96) g is about 14.7 meV. The numerics in Figs. 1(c) and 2 are generated with the site-basis Lindblad model, i.e., they assume the very reduction whose validity is at issue; they therefore cannot validate the size independence. The claim should either be restricted to the flat-spectral-density regime with a quantitative error estimate, or tested directly for a structured J(omega) using the full Redfield tensor.
  2. [Main-text Eq. (4); SM Eq. (S6); Figs. 1(c), 2 and SM Table I] The statement that transitions into dark states vanish identically relies on w_k=0 for all dark states. The numerical simulations, however, include static hopping disorder delta_t=0.5 meV, which the paper itself notes lifts dark states to small but finite w_k. The 'strictly unidirectional' property and the exact photonic-weight sum rule are therefore clean-limit statements, not properties of the disordered system actually simulated. The paper acknowledges this in passing, but the abstract and main text do not qualify the exactness, and the size-scaling curves in Fig. 1(c) are computed in the disordered system. Please state explicitly whether the reported efficiencies use the clean-limit prediction or the disordered eigenstates with nonzero w_k, and quantify how the finite-w_k corrections scale with N and delta_t.
  3. [Main-text Fig. 3; SM Eq. (S4) and Eq. (S17)] There is an inconsistency in the finite-temperature detailed-balance ratio. Main-text Eq. (3) defines gamma_rec as the T=0 emission rate 2J(Delta), and Fig. 3 states gamma_abs = e^{-Delta/k_B T} gamma_rec. However, SM Eq. (S4) gives gamma_abs = 2J(Delta) n(Delta,T) and gamma_em(T) = 2J(Delta)[1+n(Delta,T)], so gamma_abs/gamma_em(T) = n/(1+n) = e^{-Delta/k_B T}. If gamma_rec in Fig. 3 is intended to mean the finite-temperature emission rate gamma_em(T), the notation conflicts with Eq. (3); if it means the T=0 rate, the equality gamma_abs = e^{-Delta/k_B T} gamma_rec is only approximate for k_B T << Delta. The qualitative crossover survives, but the formula should be stated consistently.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains typos: 'relxation' should be 'relaxation' and 'avergae' should be 'average'.
  2. [SM Eq. (S16)] The sentence 'In the cavity-drain configuration (Gamma_D=0, F_D=0)' introduces the symbol F_D without defining it; the second condition appears to be a typo.
  3. [Main-text, rate-equation paragraph after Eq. (5)] The statement that for pure dephasing the dark population relaxes to p_D -> p_B is a degenerate-manifold statement; it may benefit from a brief qualification that this holds in the symmetric limit, since the SM later discusses density-of-states-weighted equilibration.
  4. [SM, 'Microscopic origin' section] The claim that |lambda^{(o)}/lambda^{(d)}|^2 is generically of order unity in molecular systems is plausible but cited only to spectroscopic observations; a short derivation or explicit molecular estimate would strengthen the parameter-scaling argument for gamma_rec ~ gamma_deph.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the unidirectional rate and size-independence follow algebraically from the photonic-weight sum rule; the flat-spectral-density and disorder caveats are validity limitations, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The rescue operator L_rec,i = sqrt(gamma_rec)|cav><i| follows from a microscopic Born-Markov reduction of the non-Condon coupling (SM Eqs. S1-S5), with gamma_rec = 2J(Delta) as an input rate, not a fitted parameter. Equation (4), W_k<-l = gamma_rec w_k(1-w_l), is an algebraic projection of this operator onto the eigenbasis using the single-excitation identity sum_i |<i|psi_l>|^2 = 1 - w_l, and the total escape rate from any dark state equals gamma_rec solely through the completeness relation sum_k w_k = 1. This is a theorem of the model, not a restatement of an input: the unidirectionality and the size independence are deductive consequences of vanishing cavity weight for dark states and of the sum rule. The four signatures (single-exponential dark decay, size-scaling efficiency gap, detailed-balance temperature dependence, and resonance at vibrational modes) are also derived from the model, with a closed-form efficiency formula in SM Eq. (S16), rather than extracted from the data being predicted. The only self-citations that appear, mainly refs. 44-46 for computing non-Condon couplings from first principles, are not load-bearing for the unidirectionality claim; they support parameter estimation and methodology, and the central result does not depend on their specific outputs. The limitations noted by the paper are real but are correctness or robustness concerns, not circularity: SM Eq. (S8) shows that the site-basis reduction requires a flat non-Condon spectral density, is marginal at N=6, and allows O(30%) corrections to gamma_rec; static disorder also gives dark states small but nonzero cavity weight. Because the numerical simulations use the same site-basis Lindblad model whose reduction is under test, they validate internal consistency rather than the reduction itself. These caveats weaken the quantitative size-independence claim for structured baths, but they do not make any prediction equivalent to its input by construction. The score of 2 reflects only the minor, non-load-bearing self-citations; there are no circular derivation steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation introduces no new particles or forces; it uses standard open-quantum-system approximations and a set of simulation parameters. The genuinely load-bearing modeling choice is the flat-spectral-density reduction (SM Eq. S8), which converts the eigenbasis Redfield tensor into a single site-basis jump with an N-independent rate. The parameters gamma_rec, gamma_deph, gamma_lead, g, delta_t, t, and Delta are inputs, not fit to the target results. The exact unidirectionality also assumes clean dark states with zero photonic weight, which disorder breaks.

free parameters (7)
  • gamma_rec (rescue rate) = ~1 meV (estimated from J(Delta))
    Input non-Condon spectral density value; not fitted to data but sets the predicted timescale and all signatures.
  • gamma_deph (Condon dephasing rate) = ~1 meV (matched to gamma_rec in Fig. 2)
    Standard ENAQT dephasing input used for comparison; chosen as representative molecular linewidth.
  • gamma_lead (cavity drain rate) = 0.5 meV
    Cavity extraction rate used in simulations; chosen as representative experimental photon lifetime.
  • g (light-matter coupling) = 1.5 meV
    Uniform coupling strength used in all main-text simulations.
  • delta_t (hopping disorder strength) = 0.5 meV
    Disorder strength for static hopping fluctuations; used in all disorder ensembles.
  • t (nearest-neighbor hopping amplitude) = not stated
    Required by Hamiltonian (1) for the transport simulations, but its numeric value is not given in the main text or the SM excerpt.
  • Delta (site-cavity detuning) = 0 in main-text simulations; tens of meV in proposals
    Control parameter that sets the phonon frequency sampled by J(Delta); a physical knob, not fitted to data.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Rotating-wave approximation applied to the non-Condon system-bath interaction
    SM Eq. (S2) drops counter-rotating terms; validity requires Delta, omega_k >> lambda, g.
  • domain assumption Born-Markov and secular approximations for the bath dynamics
    SM Born-Markov reduction and Eq. (S6); standard weak-coupling open-system treatment.
  • domain assumption Flat non-Condon spectral density over the polariton splitting scale
    SM Eq. (S8), J'(Delta) sqrt(N) g / J(Delta) << 1; this is the load-bearing condition that collapses the Redfield tensor to a single site-basis Lindblad rate independent of N.
  • domain assumption Single-excitation manifold
    Main text after Eq. (1): 'We work in the single-excitation manifold'; multiple excitations and finite pumping are excluded.
  • domain assumption Dark states have exactly zero photonic weight
    Main text Eq. (4) region; exact only for uniform clean coupling; static disorder breaks it.
  • domain assumption Condon and non-Condon channels are independent and their dissipators add
    SM Eqs. (S1) and (S9); assumes linear system-bath coupling splits cleanly into diagonal and off-diagonal terms.
  • domain assumption Finite-temperature bath obeys Bose-Einstein statistics with detailed balance
    SM Eq. (S4) and Eq. (S17); the reverse absorption rate is gamma_abs = gamma_rec exp(-Delta/kBT).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unidirectional Dark-to-Bright Rescue in Cavity-Coupled Quantum Transport." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P3HVHZNW

@misc{pith2026260805312,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unidirectional Dark-to-Bright Rescue in Cavity-Coupled Quantum Transport},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P3HVHZNW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05312}
}
read the original abstract

Strong light-matter coupling in optical microcavities can transport energy ballistically across an emitter array, but the same coupling buries most of the excitation in a manifold of dark states that grows with system size and traps energy outside the transport channel. We show that the off-diagonal (non-Condon) part of the exciton-phonon coupling opens a one-way escape route from this trap, driving population irreversibly from dark states into the radiative channel. This rate is fixed by a photonic-weight conservation law rather than by dark-bright overlap which evacuates the dark manifold at a rate independent of system size. The mechanism contributes to transport with near-complete efficiency with four signatures being single exponential dark state decay, a size scaling efficiency gap, distinct temperature behavior, and a resonance in the escape rate at vibrational bath modes. Beyond polariton transport, it recasts dark states from a parasitic loss channel into an engineered dissipative resource, with implications for light harvesting and dissipation based quantum control.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05312 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Unidirectional dark-to-bright rescue channel. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Cavity-drain transport dynamics at matched rates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Rescue–dephasing competition at finite temperature. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Flick, N

    J. Flick, N. Rivera, and P. Narang, Strong light-matter coupling in quantum chemistry and quantum photonics, Nanophotonics7, 1479 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    R. F. Ribeiro, L. A. Mart ´ ınez-Mart ´ ınez, M. Du, J. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Polari- ton chemistry: controlling molecular dynamics with op- tical cavities, Chem. Sci.9, 6325 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Schachenmayer, C

    J. Schachenmayer, C. Genes, E. Tignone, and G. Pupillo, Cavity-enhanced transport of excitons, Physical Review Letters114, 196403 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Feist and F

    J. Feist and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, Extraordinary exciton conductance induced by strong coupling, Physical Re- view Letters114, 196402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Orgiu, J

    E. Orgiu, J. George, J. A. Hutchison, E. Devaux, J. F. Dayen, B. Doudin, F. Stellacci, C. Genet, J. Schachen- mayer, C. Genes, G. Pupillo, P. Samor ` ı, and T. W. Ebbe- sen, Conductivity in organic semiconductors hybridized with the vacuum field, Nature Materials14, 1123 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Zhong, T

    X. Zhong, T. Chervy, S. Wang, J. George, A. Thomas, J. A. Hutchison, E. Devaux, C. Genet, and T. W. Ebbe- sen, Non-radiative energy transfer mediated by hybrid light-matter states, Angewandte Chemie International Edition55, 6202 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    T. Low, A. Chaves, J. D. Caldwell, A. Kumar, N. X. Fang, P. Avouris, T. F. Heinz, F. Guinea, L. Martin- Moreno, and F. Koppens, Polaritons in layered two- dimensional materials, Nature materials16, 182 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Rubies-Bigorda, V

    O. Rubies-Bigorda, V. Walther, T. L. Patti, and S. F. Yelin, Photon control and coherent interactions via lat- tice dark states in atomic arrays, Physical Review Re- search4, 013110 (2022)

    2022

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    S. A. Herrera-Gonz´ alez, H. A. Lara-Garc ´ ıa, G. Pirruccio, D. A. Ruiz-Tijerina, and A. Camacho-Guardian, Moir´ e excitons and exciton–polaritons: a review, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter37, 483002 (2025)

    2025

  2. [10]

    P. H. Bittorf, M. Black, H. Crispin, P. Singh, P. Dar- man, S. Darbari, F. Chahshouri, M. Taleb, and N. Talebi, Long-range exciton energy transfer in two-dimensional materials, Laser & Photonics Reviews20, e01604 (2026)

    2026

  3. [11]

    Houdr´ e, R

    R. Houdr´ e, R. P. Stanley, and M. Ilegems, Vacuum-field rabi splitting in the presence of inhomogeneous broaden- ing: Resolution of a homogeneous linewidth in an inho- mogeneously broadened system, Physical Review A53, 2711 (1996)

    1996

  4. [12]

    V. M. Agranovich, M. Litinskaya, and D. G. Lidzey, Cavity polaritons in microcavities containing disordered organic semiconductors, Physical Review B67, 085311 (2003)

    2003

  5. [13]

    K´ ena-Cohen and J

    S. K´ ena-Cohen and J. Yuen-Zhou, Polariton Chemistry: Action in the Dark, ACS Cent. Sci.5, 386 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    C. A. DelPo, B. Kudisch, K. H. Park, S.-U.-H. Khan, F. Griebel, M. Balasubrahmaniyam, J. T. Lukens, M. Guti´ errez, M. Maiuri, and G. D. Scholes, Polariton transitions in femtosecond transient absorption studies of ultrastrong light-molecule coupling, The Journal of Phys- ical...

    2020

  7. [15]

    Pandya, A

    R. Pandya, A. Ashoka, K. Georgiou, J. Sung, R. Jayaprakash, S. Renken, L. Gai, Z. Shen, A. Rao, and A. J. Musser, Tuning the coherent propagation of organic exciton-polaritons through dark state delocaliza- tion, Advanced Science9, 2105569 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Khazanov, S

    T. Khazanov, S. Gunasekaran, A. George, R. Lomlu, S. Mukherjee, and A. J. Musser, Embrace the dark- ness: An experimental perspective on organic exciton- polaritons, Chemical Physics Reviews4, 041305 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Sandik, J

    G. Sandik, J. Feist, F. J. Garc ´ ıa-Vidal, and T. Schwartz, Cavity-enhanced energy transport in molecular systems, Nature Materials 10.1038/s41563-024-01962-5 (2024), published online 9 August 2024

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    Mandal, M

    A. Mandal, M. A. D. Taylor, B. M. Weight, E. R. Koessler, X. Li, and P. Huo, Theoretical advances in po- lariton chemistry and molecular cavity quantum electro- dynamics, Chemical Reviews123, 9786 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    R. F. Ribeiro, Multimode polariton effects on molecular energy transport and spectral fluctuations, Communica- tions Chemistry5, 48 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    M. Du, L. A. Mart ´ ınez-Mart ´ ınez, R. F. Ribeiro, Z. Hu, V. M. Menon, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Theory for polariton- assisted remote energy transfer, Chem. Sci.9, 6659 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    S´ aez-Bl´ azquez, J

    R. S´ aez-Bl´ azquez, J. Feist, A. I. Fern´ andez-Dom ´ ınguez, and F. J. Garc ´ ıa-Vidal, Organic polaritons enable local vibrations to drive long-range energy transfer, Phys. Rev. B97, 241407 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    M. B. Plenio and S. F. Huelga, Dephasing-assisted trans- port: quantum networks and biomolecules, New Journal of Physics10, 113019 (2008)

    2008

  15. [23]

    Rebentrost, M

    P. Rebentrost, M. Mohseni, I. Kassal, S. Lloyd, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Environment-assisted quantum trans- port, New Journal of Physics11, 033003 (2009)

    2009

  16. [24]

    Cao and R

    J. Cao and R. J. Silbey, Optimization of exciton trap- ping in energy transfer processes, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A113, 13825 (2009). 6

    2009

  17. [25]

    Lambert, Y.-N

    N. Lambert, Y.-N. Chen, Y.-C. Cheng, C.-M. Li, G.-Y. Chen, and F. Nori, Quantum biology, Nature Physics9, 10 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    J. Cao, R. J. Cogdell, D. F. Coker, H.-G. Duan, J. Hauer, U. Kleinekath¨ ofer, T. L. C. Jansen, T. Manˇ cal, R. J. D. Miller, J. P. Ogilvie, V. I. Prokhorenko, T. Renger, H.-S. Tan, R. Tempelaar, M. Thorwart, E. Thyrhaug, S. West- enhoff, and D. Zigmantas, Quantum biology revi...

    2020

  19. [27]

    Xiang, R

    B. Xiang, R. F. Ribeiro, L. Chen, J. Wang, M. Du, J. Yuen-Zhou, and W. Xiong, State-selective polariton to dark state relaxation dynamics, The Journal of Phys- ical Chemistry A123, 5918 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    J. B. P´ erez-S´ anchez and J. Yuen-Zhou, Radiative pump- ing vs vibrational relaxation of molecular polaritons: a bosonic mapping approach, Nature Communications16, 3067 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Michail, K

    E. Michail, K. Rashidi, B. Liu, G. He, V. M. Menon, and M. Y. Sfeir, Addressing the dark state problem in strongly coupled organic exciton-polariton systems, Nano Letters24, 557 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    H¨ ubener, U

    H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, C. Sch¨ afer, J. Andberger, M. Ruggenthaler, J. Faist, and A. Rubio, Engineering quantum materials with chiral optical cavities, Nature Materials20, 438 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Gonz´ alez-Ballestero, J

    C. Gonz´ alez-Ballestero, J. Feist, E. Gonzalo Bad ´ ıa, E. Moreno, and F. J. Garc ´ ıa-Vidal, Uncoupled dark states can inherit polaritonic properties, Physical Review Letters117, 156402 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    Majumdar, M

    A. Majumdar, M. Bajcsy, A. Rundquist, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Phonon-mediated coupling between quantum dots and a photonic-crystal nanocavity, Physical Review B84, 085309 (2011)

    2011

  25. [33]

    Roy and S

    C. Roy and S. Hughes, Influence of electron-acoustic- phonon scattering on intensity power broadening in a coherently driven quantum-dot-cavity system, Physical Review X1, 021009 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    Sokolovskii, R

    I. Sokolovskii, R. H. Tichauer, D. Morozov, J. Feist, and G. Groenhof, Multi-scale molecular dynamics simu- lations of enhanced energy transfer in organic molecules under strong coupling, Nature Communications14, 6613 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Groenhof, C

    G. Groenhof, C. Climent, J. Feist, D. Morozov, and J. J. Toppari, Tracking polariton relaxation with multiscale molecular dynamics simulations, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters10, 5476 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Davidsson and M

    E. Davidsson and M. Kowalewski, Simulating photodis- sociation reactions in cavities with polaritonic lindblad master equations, Journal of Chemical Physics158, 234106 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Ashida, A

    Y. Ashida, A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, and E. Demler, Cavity quan- tum electrodynamics at arbitrary light-matter coupling strengths, Physical Review Letters126, 153603 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Physical Review109, 1492 (1958)

    1958

  31. [39]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL] for the rigorous Born-Markov derivation, the full Redfield-tensor treat- ment of the non-Condon channel, the regime of validity of the site-basis reduction, the site-Ndrain phase dia- gram, and the QCLE validation

  32. [40]

    Seibt and T

    J. Seibt and T. Manˇ cal, Treatment of herzberg-teller and non-condon effects in optical spectra with hierarchical equations of motion, Chemical Physics515, 129 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    H. Kano, T. Saito, and T. Kobayashi, Observation of herzberg-teller-type wave packet motion in porphyrin j- aggregates studied by sub-5-fs spectroscopy, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A106, 3445 (2002)

    2002

  34. [42]

    Takahashi, K

    S. Takahashi, K. Watanabe, and Y. Matsumoto, Light emission from vibronic polaritons in coupled metalloporphyrin-multimode cavity systems, The Jour- nal of Physical Chemistry Letters13, 4187 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    E. O. Odewale, A. G. Avramenko, and A. S. Rury, De- ciphering between enhanced light emission and absorp- tion in multi-mode porphyrin cavity polariton samples, Nanophotonics13, 2695 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Flick and P

    J. Flick and P. Narang, Cavity-correlated electron- nuclear dynamics from first principles, Physical review letters121, 113002 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Flick and P

    J. Flick and P. Narang, Excited-state nanophotonic and polaritonic chemistry with ab initio potential-energy sur- faces, arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.04646 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    D. S. Wang, T. Neuman, J. Flick, and P. Narang, Light– matter interaction of a molecule in a dissipative cavity from first principles, The Journal of Chemical Physics 154(2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    J. A. Hutchison, T. Schwartz, C. Genet, E. Devaux, and T. W. Ebbesen, Modifying chemical landscapes by cou- pling to vacuum fields, Angewandte Chemie International Edition51, 1592 (2012)

    2012

  40. [48]

    Lindlau, M

    J. Lindlau, M. Selig, A. Neumann, L. Colombier, J. F¨ orste, V. Funk, M. F¨ org, J. Kim, G. Bergh¨ auser, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, F. Wang, E. Malic, and A. H¨ ogele, The role of momentum-dark excitons in the elementary optical response of bilayer wse2, Nature Com- municatio...

    2018

  41. [49]

    S. Brem, A. Ekman, D. Christiansen, F. Katsch, M. Selig, C. Robert, X. Marie, B. Urbaszek, A. Knorr, and E. Malic, Phonon-assisted photoluminescence from indi- rect excitons in monolayers of transition-metal dichalco- genides, Nano Letters20, 2849 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    D. G. Lidzey, D. D. C. Bradley, M. S. Skolnick, T. Virgili, S. Walker, and D. M. Whittaker, Strong exciton-photon coupling in an organic semiconductor microcavity, Na- ture395, 53 (1998)

    1998

  43. [51]

    K´ ena-Cohen and S

    S. K´ ena-Cohen and S. R. Forrest, Room-temperature po- lariton lasing in an organic single-crystal microcavity, Na- ture Photonics4, 371 (2010)

    2010

  44. [52]

    A. M. Berghuis, A. Halpin, Q. Le-Van, M. Ramezani, S. Wang, S. Murai, and J. G. Rivas, Controlling exciton propagation in organic crystals through strong coupling to plasmonic nanoparticle arrays, ACS Photonics9, 2263 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, F. Appugliese, E. Richter, F. Valmorra, J. Keller, M. Beck, N. Bartolo, C. R¨ ossler, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, C. Ciuti, G. Scalari, and J. Faist, Magneto-transport controlled by landau polariton states, Nature Physics15, 186 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    Emin,Phonons in Semiconductor Nanostructures (Springer, 1987) hopping transport in disordered sys- tems

    D. Emin,Phonons in Semiconductor Nanostructures (Springer, 1987) hopping transport in disordered sys- tems

    1987

  47. [55]

    Gonz´ alez-Ballestero, J

    C. Gonz´ alez-Ballestero, J. Feist, E. Moreno, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, Harvesting excitons through plasmonic strong coupling, Physical Review B92, 121402 (2015)

    2015

  48. [56]

    Haroche and D

    S. Haroche and D. Kleppner, Cavity quantum electrody- namics, Physics Today42, 24 (1989)

    1989

  49. [57]

    Raimond, M

    J.-M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Haroche, Manipulat- ing quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a 7 cavity, Reviews of Modern Physics73, 565 (2001)

    2001

  50. [58]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, S. Nascimbene, S. Trotzky, Y.-A. Chen, and I. Bloch, Experimental realization of strong effective magnetic fields in an optical lattice, arXiv preprint arXiv:1110.5314 (2011)

    2011 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Du, Z.-T

    Y.-X. Du, Z.-T. Liang, Y.-C. Li, X.-X. Yue, Q.-X. Lv, W. Huang, X. Chen, H. Yan, and S.-L. Zhu, Experimen- tal realization of stimulated raman shortcut-to-adiabatic passage with cold atoms, Nature communications7, 12479 (2016)

    2016

  52. [60]

    J. I. Wang, M. A. Yamoah, Q. Li, A. H. Karamlou, T. Dinh, B. Kannan, J. Braum¨ uller, D. Kim, A. J. Melville, S. E. Muschinske,et al., Hexagonal boron ni- tride as a low-loss dielectric for superconducting quantum circuits and qubits, Nature materials21, 398 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    Manenti, A

    R. Manenti, A. F. Kockum, A. Patterson, T. Behrle, J. Rahamim, G. Tancredi, F. Nori, and P. J. Leek, Circuit quantum acoustodynamics with surface acoustic waves, Nature communications8, 975 (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    J. M. Kitzman, J. R. Lane, C. Undershute, P. Harrington, N. Beysengulov, C. Mikolas, K. Murch, and J. Pollanen, Phononic bath engineering of a superconducting qubit, arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.07423 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  55. [63]

    W. D. Oliver and P. B. Welander, Materials in supercon- ducting quantum bits, MRS bulletin38, 816 (2013)

    2013

  56. [64]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering, Physical Review X5, 021025 (2015)

    2015

  57. [65]

    S. O. Mundhada, A. Grimm, J. Venkatraman, Z. K. Minev, S. Touzard, N. E. Frattini, V. V. Sivak, K. Sliwa, P. Reinhold, S. Shankar,et al., Experimental imple- mentation of a raman-assisted six-quanta process, arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.06589 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Kannan, A

    B. Kannan, A. Almanakly, Y. Sung, A. Di Paolo, D. A. Rower, J. Braum¨ uller, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski, A. Karamlou, K. Serniak,et al., On-demand directional microwave photon emission using waveguide quantum electrodynamics, Nature Physics19, 394 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    Almanakly, A

    A. Almanakly, A. Soro, A. Vivas-Via˜ na, B. Yankelevich, C. Groiseau, D. Pahl, J. An, G. Cutter, M. E. Gingras, B. M. Niedzielski,et al., Driven-dissipative entanglement of distant giant atoms, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.13375 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2002)

    2002

  61. [69]

    W. Dou, J. E. Subotnik, and A. Nitzan, Surface hop- ping with a manifold of electronic states. II. application to the many-body Anderson-Holstein model, Journal of Chemical Physics142, 084110 (2015)

    2015

  62. [70]

    W. Dou, A. Nitzan, and J. E. Subotnik, Frictional effects near a metal surface, Journal of Chemical Physics143, 054103 (2015)

    2015

  63. [71]

    Dou and J

    W. Dou and J. E. Subotnik, Universality of electronic friction. II. equivalence of the quantum-classical liou- ville equation approach with von oppen’s nonequilibrium Green’s function methods out of equilibrium, Physical Review B97, 064303 (2018). 1 SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL FOR...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.