Systematic Inequalities in Language Technology Performance across the World's Languages
read the original abstract
Natural language processing (NLP) systems have become a central technology in communication, education, medicine, artificial intelligence, and many other domains of research and development. While the performance of NLP methods has grown enormously over the last decade, this progress has been restricted to a minuscule subset of the world's 6,500 languages. We introduce a framework for estimating the global utility of language technologies as revealed in a comprehensive snapshot of recent publications in NLP. Our analyses involve the field at large, but also more in-depth studies on both user-facing technologies (machine translation, language understanding, question answering, text-to-speech synthesis) as well as more linguistic NLP tasks (dependency parsing, morphological inflection). In the process, we (1) quantify disparities in the current state of NLP research, (2) explore some of its associated societal and academic factors, and (3) produce tailored recommendations for evidence-based policy making aimed at promoting more global and equitable language technologies.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Geometry of LLM-as-Judge: Why Inter-LLM Consensus Is Not Human Alignment
Geometric analysis shows LLM judges use collapsed score ranges and nearly orthogonal axes to humans on subjective rubrics across Indic languages, with inter-LLM agreement not equaling human alignment except on factual tasks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.