Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

DaXBench: Benchmarking Deformable Object Manipulation with Differentiable Physics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.13066 v2 pith:P46URICF submitted 2022-10-24 cs.RO

DaXBench: Benchmarking Deformable Object Manipulation with Differentiable Physics

classification cs.RO
keywords algorithmsdifferentiabledaxbenchlearningmanipulationobjectphysicstasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deformable Object Manipulation (DOM) is of significant importance to both daily and industrial applications. Recent successes in differentiable physics simulators allow learning algorithms to train a policy with analytic gradients through environment dynamics, which significantly facilitates the development of DOM algorithms. However, existing DOM benchmarks are either single-object-based or non-differentiable. This leaves the questions of 1) how a task-specific algorithm performs on other tasks and 2) how a differentiable-physics-based algorithm compares with the non-differentiable ones in general. In this work, we present DaXBench, a differentiable DOM benchmark with a wide object and task coverage. DaXBench includes 9 challenging high-fidelity simulated tasks, covering rope, cloth, and liquid manipulation with various difficulty levels. To better understand the performance of general algorithms on different DOM tasks, we conduct comprehensive experiments over representative DOM methods, ranging from planning to imitation learning and reinforcement learning. In addition, we provide careful empirical studies of existing decision-making algorithms based on differentiable physics, and discuss their limitations, as well as potential future directions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SoftVTBench: A Safety-Aware Visuo-Tactile Benchmark for Physically Constrained Robotic Manipulation of Deformable Objects

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Success-only metrics overstate deformable-manipulation performance; tactile sensing raises Safety Success (e.g. 21.4%→35.6% on Object-Soft) while Goal Success stays comparable.

  2. World Action Models: The Next Frontier in Embodied AI

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper introduces World Action Models as a new paradigm unifying predictive world modeling with action generation in embodied foundation models and provides a taxonomy of existing approaches.

  3. Data Pyramid for Embodied Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0

    Embodied training data form a five-layer pyramid—real-robot, UMI, ego/exo, simulation, general V–L—ordered by the trade-off between scale and robot alignment, and model capabilities track how those layers are mixed.

  4. Integrating Mechanistic and Data-Driven Models for Neurological Disorders through Differentiable Programming

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    This perspective paper categorizes hybrid architectures for combining mechanistic and data-driven models using residual learning, Neural ODEs, and solver-in-the-loop to model neurological disorder progression.