Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 minor 71 references

Spectro-polarimetric radio imaging with SKA can map coronal magnetic fields that optical methods and extrapolations cannot reach.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 01:07 UTC pith:P4KV23DF

load-bearing objection Solid, well-referenced SKA science-case chapter that maps established radio coronal-B diagnostics onto SKA-Low/Mid capabilities; no new physics, but useful and referee-ready as a review.

arxiv 2607.03620 v1 pith:P4KV23DF submitted 2026-07-03 astro-ph.SR

Coronal Magnetography using Spectropolarimetry with SKA Telescopes

Deepan Patra , Puja Majee , Soham Dey , Devojyoti Kansabanik , Divya Oberoi , Anshu Kumari , Surajit Mondal , Ketaki Deshpande
show 1 more author
Divya Paliwal
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords coronal magnetic fieldspectropolarimetrySKAgyroresonancefree-free emissionplasma emissionsolar radio burstsspace weather
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Coronal magnetic fields control flares, coronal mass ejections, the solar wind and space weather, yet they are still almost never measured directly. Optical Zeeman methods fail because the corona is optically thin and the fields are weak; photospheric extrapolations lack coronal constraints especially when the field is changing fast. This chapter shows that radio emission mechanisms—thermal free-free, gyro-resonance, gyrosynchrotron and coherent plasma radiation—each encode magnetic-field strength or orientation in their intensity and polarization. SKA-Low and SKA-Mid together cover 50 MHz to 15 GHz with high sensitivity, dense uv-coverage and full-Stokes snapshot imaging, so the same instrument can sample many coronal heights at once. The result would be routine, observationally constrained maps of the coronal field that can finally test and improve the models used for space-weather prediction.

Core claim

The paper’s central claim is that high-fidelity spectro-polarimetric imaging across SKA’s 0.05–15 GHz band will turn free-free circular polarization, gyro-resonance layer heights, gyrosynchrotron spectra and the polarization of radio bursts into quantitative, multi-height coronal magnetograms that optical techniques and photospheric extrapolations cannot supply.

What carries the argument

The mapping of magneto-ionic modes (x-mode versus o-mode) and their absorption, emission and mode-coupling signatures onto measurable Stokes-V (and, for some bursts, linear) polarization; each emission process thereby becomes a direct or semi-direct probe of local B.

Load-bearing premise

That residual instrumental leakage, ionospheric Faraday rotation and direction-dependent beam errors at low frequencies can be calibrated well enough to recover the few-percent circular-polarization signals on which free-free and harmonic plasma diagnostics rest.

What would settle it

A full-Stokes solar imaging campaign with SKA (or a pathfinder at comparable fidelity) that either recovers or fails to recover the expected free-free circular polarization of order 1–10 % above a well-observed active region or streamer whose field strength is independently constrained by multi-wavelength density and temperature diagnostics.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 7 minor

Summary. This chapter reviews remote-sensing techniques for measuring solar coronal magnetic fields via radio spectro-polarimetry and argues that SKA-Low and SKA-Mid will enable transformative multi-height magnetography. It covers free-free emission (weak circular polarization giving B_LoS via the standard QL approximation), gyroresonance (iso-Gauss layers above active regions and bright points), gyrosynchrotron (flaring loops and CMEs), plasma emission (type II/III/IV bursts, band-splitting, and harmonic polarization), fibre/zebra fine structures, and propagation effects (QT mode coupling and polarization inversion). Established formulae (e.g., free-free V_frac, gyroresonance optical depth, Rankine–Hugoniot compression, Cohen Q) are correctly cited and illustrated with precursor results from MWA, MeerKAT, EOVSA, NoRH and RATAN-600. Section 4 maps these diagnostics onto SKA AA* capabilities (bandwidth, sensitivity, resolution, subarrays) and coordinated multi-wavelength observations.

Significance. Coronal magnetography remains a central unsolved problem for solar physics and space weather. The manuscript provides a clear, multi-mechanism synthesis that correctly situates radio diagnostics relative to optical/EUV Zeeman/Hanle methods and photospheric extrapolations. Its value lies in the systematic linkage of well-established emission physics to concrete SKA observing modes and in the explicit incorporation of recent precursor advances (MWA leakage pipelines, MeerKAT bright-point imaging, EOVSA GS spectral fitting). If the calibration path outlined in §4.1 succeeds, the chapter supplies a practical roadmap for routine 2-D/3-D coronal field constraints across quiet Sun, active regions and eruptive events.

minor comments (7)
  1. Throughout: several compound words are missing spaces or hyphens (e.g., “spaceweathertothemuchweakernanoflares”, “high-fidelitypolarimetric”, “widebandobservations”). A global copy-edit pass is needed.
  2. Eq. (11) and surrounding text: the numerical prefactor 5400 assumes cgs units and the QL approximation; a one-sentence reminder of the validity regime (ν_B/ν ≪ 1, independent T) would help non-specialist readers.
  3. Figure 1 caption and body: the original Gary (2001) plasma-β schematic is useful, but the overlaid radio-probe labels would benefit from a short legend distinguishing free-free, gyroresonance and plasma-emission height ranges.
  4. Section 3.4.2 (type II): the two competing interpretations of band-splitting (upstream/downstream vs. different shock locations) are both cited; a brief statement of which assumption is adopted for the B estimates that follow would reduce ambiguity.
  5. Section 4.1: the discussion of polconversion/polrotation and ionospheric Faraday rotation is appropriately cautious; adding a quantitative target (e.g., residual leakage ≲ 0.1–1 % for free-free V) would make the calibration requirement more concrete.
  6. Table 1: heights and B values are useful; adding the assumed density model or scale length used in each study would improve reproducibility.
  7. References: a few arXiv-only or “in preparation” entries (e.g., Oberoi et al. 2026, Mondal et al. 2026) should be updated or flagged as companion AASKAII chapters if they remain unpublished at acceptance.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: prospective review applying established radio diagnostics to SKA capabilities; no fitted-as-prediction or self-definitional steps.

full rationale

This is a science-case chapter for Advancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II, not a primary derivation paper. Section 3 reviews free-free (Eqs. 1–11 from Zlotnik/Dulk/Fleishman), gyro-resonance (Eq. 12 from White & Kundu), gyrosynchrotron (Ramaty/Dulk), plasma emission (Eq. 14 from Melrose et al.), and mode-coupling (Eqs. 18–22 from Cohen/Zheleznyakov) diagnostics, all taken from the external literature and applied forward. Section 4 then maps those established techniques onto SKA-Low/Mid bandwidth, sensitivity, and polarimetric imaging, citing the authors’ own precursor pipelines (MWA leakage calibration, MeerKAT bright-point imaging) only as demonstrated technical progress, not as uniqueness theorems or load-bearing uniqueness claims that force the central result. No parameter is fitted to data and then re-labeled a prediction; no equation is defined in terms of the quantity it purports to derive; no ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation. The residual calibration risk for weak Stokes-V is openly flagged by the authors themselves (§4.1) rather than hidden. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits no circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review/science-case chapter the load-bearing content rests on standard plasma-physics and magneto-ionic theory plus the published SKA AA* array specifications. No free parameters are fitted; no new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Cold-plasma magneto-ionic theory (QL/QT approximations, mode-coupling parameter Q) correctly describes radio-wave propagation in the solar corona.
    Invoked throughout Sections 3.1, 3.6 for free-free polarization and circular-polarization inversion.
  • domain assumption Gyroresonance optical depth is significant only for the 2nd and 3rd harmonics under typical coronal temperatures and densities.
    Used in Section 3.2 to map microwave spectra to iso-Gauss surfaces.
  • domain assumption Type-II band splitting arises from upstream/downstream shock regions (Rankine–Hugoniot), allowing Alfvén-speed and B estimates.
    Section 3.4.2; alternative geometric interpretations are noted but the standard formula is retained.
  • domain assumption SKA-Low (307 stations) and SKA-Mid (144 dishes) AA* configurations will deliver the stated instantaneous bandwidths, baselines and imaging dynamic range.
    Section 4.2; taken from current SKAO design documents.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 30370 in / 2306 out tokens · 20938 ms · 2026-07-12T01:07:58.230439+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The solar coronal magnetic field drives nearly every aspect of solar phenomena and activity -- from flares, coronal mass ejections, and solar wind that governs space weather to the much weaker nanoflares. These magnetic fields are routinely measured at the visible surface of the Sun, the photosphere. However, detailed and direct measurements of the magnetic fields in the solar atmosphere, particularly in the coronal layer, have remained rather limited. Mostly, these are estimated from vector magnetic field measurements at photospheric heights through different extrapolation models. In the case of the corona, these extrapolations lack observational constraints from the corona, especially during periods of intense activity when magnetic structures evolve rapidly. Measurements of coronal magnetic fields from observations, therefore, remain one of the most crucial and unresolved challenges in solar and space-weather research. Radio observations of the Sun hold considerable potential in this regard. Observations of diverse emission mechanisms, ranging from plasma emissions at lower frequencies to thermal Bremsstrahlung and gyro-resonance at higher frequencies, provide multiple avenues to probe the coronal magnetic fields, unique at radio wavelengths. SKAO, with its broad frequency coverage (0.05 to 15 GHz), will allow us to probe wide range of coronal layers through unprecedented high-fidelity polarimetric imaging at high temporal, spectral, and spatial resolutions. This chapter details how the coronal magnetic field measurements can be achieved through spectro-polarimetric imaging of the Sun with the SKAO.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03620 by Anshu Kumari, Deepan Patra, Devojyoti Kansabanik, Divya Oberoi, Divya Paliwal, Ketaki Deshpande, Puja Majee, Soham Dey, Surajit Mondal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: This schematic shows the variation of plasma 𝛽 parameter with height above an active region. The right side shows the current numerical models used for magnetic field modeling at different heights. On the left side are the observations from which magnetic field information can be obtained at different heights. The original plot was taken from Gary (2001). 3 Magnetic field measurement using Radio observatio… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison between synthetic and observed MeerKAT radio images on 2020 September 27, 10:45 UTC. Left panel: synthetic MeerKAT solar radio image. Right panel: observed MeerKAT solar radio image. In both images, multiple bright regions have been detected. Some of them are marked by cyan circles. Small green-filled circles at the bottom left corner marked by a green box represent the PSF of the images. Figure… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of gyrosynchrotron emission spectra from CME plasma as reported in various studies. The figure is adapted from Kansabanik et al. (2023b) (CMEs), provided that the associated type IV emission arises from GS rather than plasma emission processes—a distinction identifiable from low brightness temperatures and peaked spectra (Klein and Trottet, 1984). Although radio-bright CMEs are rare, early work … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The upper panel illustrates the expected brightness temperatures (red bars) and circular polarization fractions (blue bars) of several low-frequency solar radio emissions, including type III, II, I, and IV bursts, quiet-Sun free–free emission, and CME-associated gyrosynchrotron radiation (from left to right). The lower panel presents corresponding dynamic spectra and radio images. The type II–IV spectra ar… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (Right) This schematic diagram shows propagation of x-mode through a bipolar magnetic field and it effects on the observed polarization depending on the viewing angle (R and L denotes RCP and LCP respectively). When it crosses a transverse magnetic field (𝐴𝑟2) the sense of circular polarization changes. Also in case of acute angles the polarization of x-mode is RCP and if the angle becomes obtuse it change… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Bandwidth coverage of radio interferometers currently in operation for solar observations. Each interferometer is represented by its operational frequency bands, with solid colors indicating frequencies currently utilized for solar polarimetry studies and hatched patterns indicating frequency ranges where solar polarimetry observations have not been reported. The upcoming telescopes (SKA-mid and SKA-low) a… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The observational characteristics of radio interferometers, currently in operation for solar obser￾vation, across different frequency and time resolutions. The horizontal axis (logarithmic scale) represents frequency resolution, ranging from 0.5 kHz to 1 MHz, where higher values indicate coarser frequency reso￾lution. The vertical axis (logarithmic scale) shows time resolution, ranging from 0.003 s to 5 s,… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of radio interferometers, currently in operation, in the Field of View (FOV) vs. Point Source Sensitivity plane. Each instrument is represented by a unique marker and color, plotted according to its instantaneous FOV (x-axis, deg²) and point-source sensitivity achieved in 12 hours of integration (y-axis, mJy) at representative centre frequencies. The instruments span frequencies from ∼ 40 MHz (N… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    doi: 10.1007/BF00146972. C. Alissandrakis, M. Kundu, and P. Lantos.Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 82, no. 1-2, Feb. 1980, p. 30-40., 82:30–40,

    doi:10.1007/bf00146972 1980

  2. [2]

    H.Aurass,G.Rausche,G.Mann,andA.Hofmann.Astronomy&Astrophysics,435(3):1137–1148,

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141672. H.Aurass,G.Rausche,G.Mann,andA.Hofmann.Astronomy&Astrophysics,435(3):1137–1148,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141672

  3. [3]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/782/1/43. R. Bandiera.Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 112, no. 1, Aug. 1982, p. 52-60., 112:52–60,

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/782/1/43 1982

  4. [4]

    doi: 10.1086/323421. A. O. Benz and G. Mann.Astronomy and Astrophysics, v. 333, p. 1034-1042 (1998), 333:1034– 1042,

    doi:10.1086/323421 1998

  5. [5]

    T. E. Bernold and R. A. Treumann.Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 264, Jan. 15, 1983, p. 677-688. Research supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation and Swiss Society for Astronomy and Astrophysics., 264:677–688,

    1983

  6. [6]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244456. V. Bogod and G. Gelfreikh.Solar Physics, 67(1):29–46,

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244456

  7. [7]

    URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346788

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346788. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346788. J. W. Brosius et al.The Astrophysical Journal, 574(1):453,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346788

  8. [8]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731368. B. Chen et al.Nature Astronomy, 4(12):1140–1147,

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731368

  9. [9]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015578. M. H. Cohen.Astrophysical Journal, vol. 131, p. 664, 131:664,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015578

  10. [10]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acabc3. C. DeForest et al.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2509.15131,

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acabc3

  11. [11]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.15131. S. Dey, D. Kansabanik, D. Oberoi, and S. Mondal. ApJ, 988(2):L73, Aug

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.15131

  12. [12]

    doi: 10.3847/ 2041-8213/adef0e. Dey, S. et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics, 704:A75,

    2041

  13. [13]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202556857

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556857. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202556857. C. Downs et al.Science, page eadq0872,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556857

  14. [14]

    doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/793/2/L39. G. A. Dulk. ARA&A, 23:169–224, Jan

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/793/2/l39 2041

  15. [15]

    25 Coronal magnetography Patra et al

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.23.090185.001125. 25 Coronal magnetography Patra et al. G. A. Dulk and S. Suzuki. A&A, 88(1-2):203–217, Aug

    doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.23.090185.001125

  16. [16]

    doi: 10.1007/BF00153154. G. D. Fleishman and V. F. Melnikov. ApJ, 587(2):823–835, Apr

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00153154

  17. [17]

    doi: 10.1086/368252. G. D. Fleishman et al.Science, 367(6475):278–280,

    work page doi:10.1086/368252

  18. [18]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad0ef. D. E. Gary et al.The Astrophysical Journal, 863(1):83,

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad0ef

  19. [19]

    ISSN2296- 987X

    S.E.Gibsonetal.FrontiersinAstronomyandSpaceSciences,Volume3-2016,2016. ISSN2296- 987X. doi: 10.3389/fspas.2016.00008. URLhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ astronomy-and-space-sciences/articles/10.3389/fspas.2016.00008. V. L. Ginzburg, W. L. Sadowski, D. Gallik, and S. C. Brown.Physics Today, 15(10):70–73,

    doi:10.3389/fspas.2016.00008 2016

  20. [20]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/72. G. Hallinan et al. InAmerican Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #241, volume 241 of American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, page 451.09, Jan

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/744/1/72

  21. [21]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/14. K. Hariharan, R. Ramesh, and C. Kathiravan. Sol. Phys., 290(9):2479–2489, Sept

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/795/1/14

  22. [22]

    K.Hariharan,R.Ramesh,C.Kathiravan,andT.J.Wang

    doi: 10.1007/s11207-015-0761-5. K.Hariharan,R.Ramesh,C.Kathiravan,andT.J.Wang. Sol.Phys.,291(5):1405–1416,May2016. doi: 10.1007/s11207-016-0918-x. B. C. Hicks et al. PASP, 124(920):1090, Oct

    doi:10.1007/s11207-015-0761-5

  23. [23]

    doi: 10.1086/668121. K. Iwai et al.Earth, Planets and Space, 66(1):149,

    doi:10.1086/668121

  24. [24]

    26 Coronal magnetography Patra et al

    doi: 10.1017/S1323358000011383. 26 Coronal magnetography Patra et al. T. Kakinuma and G. Swarup.Astrophysical Journal, vol. 136, p. 975, 136:975,

    work page doi:10.1017/s1323358000011383

  25. [28]

    doi: 10.3389/fspas.2025.1666743

    ISSN 2296-987X. doi: 10.3389/fspas.2025.1666743. URL https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/astronomy-and-space-sciences/ articles/10.3389/fspas.2025.1666743. D. Kansabanik et al. ApJS, 278(1):26, May

    doi:10.3389/fspas.2025.1666743 2025

  26. [29]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/adc443. K. G. Klein et al.Space Science Reviews, 219(8):74,

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adc443

  27. [30]

    doi: 10.1071/PH580201. A. Kouloumvakos et al. ApJ, 913(2):99, June

    work page doi:10.1071/ph580201

  28. [31]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf435. H. A. Kramers.The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 46(275):836–871,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf435

  29. [32]

    Kumari, R

    A. Kumari, R. Ramesh, C. Kathiravan, and N. Gopalswamy. ApJ, 843(1):10, July 2017a. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa72e7. A. Kumari, R. Ramesh, C. Kathiravan, and T. J. Wang. Sol. Phys., 292(11):161, November 2017b. doi: 10.1007/s11207-017-1180-6. A. Kumari et al. ApJ, 881(1):24, August

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa72e7

  30. [33]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2adf. M. Kundu and C. Alissandrakis.Solar physics, 94(2):249–283,

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2adf

  31. [34]

    doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-3587-3_21. M. R. Kundu.New York: Interscience Publication,

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-010-3587-3_21

  32. [35]

    doi: 10.1007/BF00148288. A. Kuznetsov and E. Kontar.Solar Physics, 290(1):79–93,

    doi:10.1007/bf00148288

  33. [36]

    doi: 10.1007/s11214-015-0219-y. K. Lang et al.Astrophysical Journal v. 419, p. 398, 419:398,

    doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0219-y

  34. [37]

    doi: 10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8. H. Lin, J. Kuhn, and R. Coulter.The Astrophysical Journal, 613(2):L177,

    doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8

  35. [38]

    doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2018.03.018. D. J. F. Maia et al. ApJ, 660(1):874–881, May

    doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2018.03.018 2018

  36. [39]

    doi: 10.1086/508011. P. I. McCauley et al.Solar Physics, 294(8):106,

    doi:10.1086/508011

  37. [40]

    doi: 10.1086/160219. D. B. Melrose and W. N. Sy.Australian Journal of Physics, 25:387, Aug

    doi:10.1086/160219

  38. [41]

    doi: 10.1007/BF00156783. S. Mondal, D. Oberoi, and A. Mohan. ApJ, 895(2):L39, June 2020a. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ ab8817. S. Mondal, D. Oberoi, and A. Vourlidas. ApJ, 893(1):28, April 2020b. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ ab7fab. S. Mondal et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    doi:10.1007/bf00156783 2041

  39. [42]

    28 Coronal magnetography Patra et al

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834510. 28 Coronal magnetography Patra et al. D. Müller et al. A&A, 642:A1, Oct

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834510

  40. [43]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038467. J. Nagelis and B. Ryabov.Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies, 8(6):28–32,

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038467

  41. [44]

    doi: 10.1093/pasj/37.1.163. H. Nakajima et al.IEEE Proceedings, 82(5):705–713, May

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/37.1.163

  42. [45]

    doi: 10.1109/5.284737. A. Nindos, S. White, M. Kundu, and D. Gary.The Astrophysical Journal, 533(2):1053,

    doi:10.1109/5.284737

  43. [46]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/236. G. M. Nita et al.The Astrophysical Journal, 853(1):66,

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/2/236

  44. [47]

    M.PalombaandJ.-P.Luntama.44thCOSPARScientificAssembly.Held16-24July,44:3544,2022

    arXiv search: Report number AASKAII/Oberoi01. M.PalombaandJ.-P.Luntama.44thCOSPARScientificAssembly.Held16-24July,44:3544,2022. R. A. Perley, C. J. Chandler, B. J. Butler, and J. M. Wrobel. ApJ, 739(1):L1, Sept

    2022

  45. [48]

    doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/739/1/L1. B. Perri et al. ApJ, 936(1):19, aug

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/739/1/l1 2041

  46. [49]

    URLhttps://dx

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7237. URLhttps://dx. doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac7237. B. Perri et al. ApJ, 943(2):124, feb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7237

  47. [50]

    URLhttps: //dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac9799

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9799. URLhttps: //dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac9799. N. Peterova and S. B. Akhmedov.Soviet Astronomy, Vol. 17, p. 768, 17:768,

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9799

  48. [51]

    doi: 10.1086/150235. R. Ramesh and C. Kathiravan. ApJ, 940(1):80, November

    doi:10.1086/150235

  49. [52]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9c65. R. Ramesh, C. Kathiravan, and C. V. Sastry.The Astrophysical Journal, 711(2):1029,

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9c65

  50. [53]

    R.Ramesh,C.Kathiravan,andA.Kumari.ApJ,943(1):43,January2023.doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ acaea5

    doi: 10.3847/ 1538-4357/ac6f05. R.Ramesh,C.Kathiravan,andA.Kumari.ApJ,943(1):43,January2023.doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ acaea5. N. E. Raouafi et al. Space Sci. Rev., 219(1):8, Feb

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/

  51. [54]

    doi: 10.1007/s11214-023-00952-4. T. R. Rimmele et al.Solar Physics, 295(12):1–49,

    doi:10.1007/s11214-023-00952-4

  52. [55]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/ 202037989. C. V. Sastry. ApJ, 697(2):1934–1939, June

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/ 1934

  53. [56]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1934. R. J. Sault, J. P. Hamaker, and J. D. Bregman. A&AS, 117:149–159, May

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/1934 1934

  54. [57]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16950982. S. Segre and V. Zanza.The Astrophysical Journal, 554(1):408,

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.16950982

  55. [58]

    doi: 10.1017/pasa.2012.007. D. Tripathi et al.Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 18(S372):17–27,

    doi:10.1017/pasa.2012.007 2012

  56. [59]

    doi: 10.1017/S1743921323001230. S. D. Tun and A. Vourlidas. ApJ, 766(2):130, April

    doi:10.1017/s1743921323001230

  57. [60]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/130. V. Tzatzakis, A. Nindos, and C. E. Alissandrakis. Sol. Phys., 253(1-2):79–94, Dec

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/766/2/130

  58. [61]

    doi: 10.1007/s11207-008-9263-z. B. van der Holst et al.The Astrophysical Journal, 782(2):81,

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-008-9263-z

  59. [62]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873. V. Vasanth et al. ApJ, 830(1):L2, Oct

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220873

  60. [63]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/830/1/L2. B. Vršnak, H. Aurass, J. Magdalenić, and N. Gopalswamy. A&A, 377:321–329, October

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/830/1/l2 2041

  61. [64]

    30 Coronal magnetography Patra et al

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011067. 30 Coronal magnetography Patra et al. B.Vršnak,J.Magdalenić,H.Aurass,andG.Mann. A&A,396:673–682,Dec.2002. doi: 10.1051/ 0004-6361:20021413. M. Wang, C. C. Duan, R. X. Xie, and Y. H. Yan. Sol. Phys., 212(2):401–406, Feb

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011067 2002

  62. [65]

    doi: 10.1023/A:1022939203483. S. White and M. Kundu.Solar Physics, 174(1):31–52,

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1022939203483

  63. [66]

    J.WildandS.Smerd.AnnualReviewofAstronomyandAstrophysics,vol.10,p.159,10:159,1972. J. P. Wild. PASA, 1(2):38–39, Nov

    1972

  64. [67]

    doi: 10.1017/S1323358000010407. Y. Yan et al.frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 8:584043,

    work page doi:10.1017/s1323358000010407

  65. [68]

    InM.R.KunduandT.E.Gergely,editors,RadioPhysicsofthe Sun,volume86ofIAUSymposium,pages87–99,Jan.1980

    V.V.ZhelezniakovandE.I.Zlotnik. InM.R.KunduandT.E.Gergely,editors,RadioPhysicsofthe Sun,volume86ofIAUSymposium,pages87–99,Jan.1980. doi: 10.1017/S0074180900036676. V. Zheleznyakov.Soviet Astronomy, Vol. 6, p. 3, 6:3,

    work page doi:10.1017/s0074180900036676 1980

  66. [69]

    V.ZheleznyakovandE.Y.Zlotnik.RadiophysicsandQuantumElectronics,20(9):997–1009,1977. A. N. Zhukov et al.arXiv e-prints, (arXiv:2509.00253),

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1977

  67. [70]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.00253. I. Zimovets et al. A&A, 547:A6, Nov

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.00253

  68. [71]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219454. I. V. Zimovets and V. M. Sadykov.Advances in Space Research, 56(12):2811–2832, Dec

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219454

  69. [72]

    doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2015.01.041. E. I. Zlotnik. A&A, 101(2):250–258, Aug

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2015.01.041 2015

  70. [73]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732308. P. Zucca et al. A&A, 703:A271, Nov

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732308

  71. [74]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554348. 31

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554348