REVIEW 1 cited by
Deep Active Learning in the Presence of Label Noise: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep active learning has emerged as a powerful tool for training deep learning models within a predefined labeling budget. These models have achieved performances comparable to those trained in an offline setting. However, deep active learning faces substantial issues when dealing with classification datasets containing noisy labels. In this literature review, we discuss the current state of deep active learning in the presence of label noise, highlighting unique approaches, their strengths, and weaknesses. With the recent success of vision transformers in image classification tasks, we provide a brief overview and consider how the transformer layers and attention mechanisms can be used to enhance diversity, importance, and uncertainty-based selection in queries sent to an oracle for labeling. We further propose exploring contrastive learning methods to derive good image representations that can aid in selecting high-value samples for labeling in an active learning setting. We also highlight the need for creating unified benchmarks and standardized datasets for deep active learning in the presence of label noise for image classification to promote the reproducibility of research. The review concludes by suggesting avenues for future research in this area.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Deep Active Learning for Lung Disease Severity Classification from Chest X-rays: Learning with Less Data in the Presence of Class Imbalance
Simple uncertainty-based active learning with a weighted loss matched full-data COVID-19 CXR severity classifiers using 15.4% (binary) and 23.1% (multi-class) of training labels.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.