Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 62 references

Chirped-pulse engineering for robust control of single-molecule orientation in a cavity

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Chirped pulses achieve a maximum orientation degree of 0.5773 for single OCS molecules in a cavity by activating multiphoton processes.

desk verdict Unequal chirp rates reach a reported 0.5773 orientation in cavity OCS but the number lacks shown convergence against rotational basis size. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.28511 v1 pith:P6WE7NG3 submitted 2026-05-27 quant-ph

Li-Bao Fan , Yu Guo , Shan Ma , Chuan-Cun Shu This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords chirpedpulsesmolecularorientationcavityQEDOCSmoleculepolaritonstatesmultiphotonprocessescoherentcontrolrobust
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper examines coherent control of a single carbonyl sulfide molecule strongly coupled to a cavity by applying two chirped pulses that differ in spectral phase. Numerical simulations compare equal and unequal chirp rates and track the resulting quantum dynamics of the molecule-cavity system. The results indicate that chirped driving activates multiphoton transitions among polariton states, producing an orientation degree up to 0.5773 that departs from first-order Magnus predictions. The achieved orientation stays stable when chirp amplitude and detuning vary. This supplies a concrete route for orienting individual molecules inside cavity systems.

What carries the argument

Two chirped pulses with equal or unequal rates (β+ and β-) that drive the strongly coupled OCS-cavity system and activate multiphoton processes among polariton states.

What would settle it

Laboratory measurement of OCS orientation in a cavity under the same two chirped pulses yielding a peak value substantially different from 0.5773 or showing strong sensitivity to chirp amplitude and detuning.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Numerical simulations of OCS molecules under two chirped pulses with different spectral phases show that chirped-pulse driving enables precise control of molecular orientation in a cavity, reaching a maximum degree of 0.5773. Examination of the molecular polariton state distribution demonstrates that chirped pulses trigger multiphoton processes that cause departures from first-order Magnus expansion results. The maximum orientation remains robust against variations in chirp amplitude and detuning.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical model of OCS molecule dynamics under the two specified chirped pulses accurately captures the real quantum evolution inside the cavity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Chirped pulses activate multiphoton processes that deviate from first-order Magnus expansion predictions.
  • Maximum orientation degree stays stable when chirp amplitude and detuning change.
  • The approach supplies a strategy for controlling molecular orientation inside cavity systems.
  • Pulse-parameter analysis gives practical guidance for optimizing control in experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same pulse-engineering method could be tested on other polar molecules to check whether similar orientation values appear.
  • Real-cavity experiments could vary environmental noise to see whether the reported robustness persists outside ideal simulations.
  • Higher-order Magnus terms or full time-dependent numerics might be needed to predict orientation when multiphoton channels open.
  • Orientation control of this kind could be combined with cavity-modified reaction rates to explore new regimes of cavity chemistry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a theoretical investigation of coherent control of the orientation of a single OCS molecule strongly coupled to a cavity using two chirped pulses. It compares equal (β+ = β−) and unequal (β+ eq β−) chirp-rate configurations, reports numerical simulations yielding a maximum orientation degree of 0.5773, shows activation of multiphoton processes that deviate from first-order Magnus expansion predictions via polariton-state analysis, and demonstrates robustness of this maximum with respect to chirp amplitude and detuning.

Significance. If the central numerical result is shown to be converged, the work would introduce a useful chirped-pulse strategy for molecular orientation control in cavity QED, with potential relevance to quantum control experiments. The robustness checks and multiphoton analysis are positive elements that could strengthen the contribution once the simulation details are provided.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of a maximum orientation degree of 0.5773 (and the associated multiphoton activation) is presented without any information on the rotational basis size (J_max), photon-number cutoff, the explicit form of the Hamiltonian, or convergence tests with respect to these truncations. Because the analysis explicitly invokes multiphoton processes that populate high-J states, the quoted numerical value is sensitive to basis truncation; this omission prevents verification that the result is physical rather than an artifact.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to deviations from first-order Magnus expansion methods without a citation or a brief statement of the expansion's applicability range in this context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. The concern regarding insufficient detail on numerical convergence is valid and will be addressed directly in the revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of a maximum orientation degree of 0.5773 (and the associated multiphoton activation) is presented without any information on the rotational basis size (J_max), photon-number cutoff, the explicit form of the Hamiltonian, or convergence tests with respect to these truncations. Because the analysis explicitly invokes multiphoton processes that populate high-J states, the quoted numerical value is sensitive to basis truncation; this omission prevents verification that the result is physical rather than an artifact.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract (and main text) should explicitly state the truncation parameters and convergence evidence to allow independent verification. In the revised manuscript we will (i) add the explicit form of the Hamiltonian, (ii) report the values of J_max and the photon-number cutoff used for the quoted 0.5773 result, and (iii) include a dedicated paragraph (or supplementary section) presenting convergence tests with respect to both J_max and photon cutoff, confirming that the reported orientation is stable to within the stated precision. These additions will be placed in the Methods or Results section and referenced from the abstract. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; central result is direct numerical output

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing claim is the numerical value 0.5773 obtained by propagating OCS dynamics under specified chirped pulses. No equations define a quantity in terms of itself, no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, and no self-citation chain supplies the central result. The derivation consists of standard time-dependent quantum simulation whose output is independent of the reported number; the result is therefore self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, background axioms, or new postulated entities are described in the provided text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chirped-pulse engineering for robust control of single-molecule orientation in a cavity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P6WE7NG3

@misc{pith2026260528511,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chirped-pulse engineering for robust control of single-molecule orientation in a cavity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P6WE7NG3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.28511}
}
abstract

We present a theoretical investigation of coherent control over the orientation of an individual molecule strongly coupled with a cavity using chirped-pulse driving. Specifically, we explore the dynamics of carbonyl sulfide (OCS) molecules under the influence of two chirped pulses with different spectral phases. We compare two pulse configurations: one with equal chirp rates ($\beta_{+} = \beta_{-}$) and another with unequal chirp rates ($\beta_{+} \neq \beta_{-}$). Numerical simulations reveal that chirped pulses enable precise control of the molecular orientation, achieving a maximum orientation degree of 0.5773. By analyzing the distribution of molecular polariton states, we show that chirped pulses can activate multiphoton processes, leading to deviations from the predictions of first-order Magnus expansion methods. Additionally, we demonstrate the robustness of the maximum orientation with respect to chirp amplitude and detuning, providing insights into the role of pulse parameters in optimizing control. This work introduces a new strategy for controlling molecular orientation in cavity-based systems and offers valuable perspectives for future experimental applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28511 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of a single molecule in a single-mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Numerically calculated post-pulse orientation of the molec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The final populations (a)-(c) and phases (d)-(f) of the three states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The maximum orientation values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Final populations of the three polariton states versus the chirp rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) and (b) display the equal-chirp configuration β+ = β−, where |⟨cos θ⟩|max is mapped in the (β, ∆) plane. Near the operating point β = 0 and ∆ = 0, the orientation reproduces the corresponding unchirped reference behavior, and high-orientation regions persist around…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references

  1. [1]

    J. A. Hutchison, T. Schwartz, C. Genet, E. Devaux, and T. W. Ebbesen, Modifying chemical landscapes by coupling to vac- uum fields, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.51, 1592 (2012)

    2012

  2. [2]

    F. J. Garcia-Vidal, C. Ciuti, and T. W. Ebbesen, Manipulat- ing matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields, Science373, eabd0336 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Nagarajan, A

    K. Nagarajan, A. Thomas, and T. W. Ebbesen, Chemistry un- der vibrational strong coupling, J. Am. Chem. Soc.143, 16877 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    D. M. Coles, N. Somaschi, P. Michetti, C. Clark, P. G. Lagoudakis, P. G. Savvidis, and D. G. Lidzey, Polariton- mediated energy transfer between organic dyes in a strongly coupled optical microcavity, Nat. Mater.13, 712 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    Zhong, T

    X. Zhong, T. Chervy, L. Zhang, A. Thomas, J. George, C. Genet, J. A. Hutchison, and T. W. Ebbesen, Energy trans- fer between spatially separated entangled molecules, Angew. Chem.129, 9162 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    Akulov, D

    K. Akulov, D. Bochman, A. Golombek, and T. Schwartz, Long-distance resonant energy transfer mediated by hybrid plasmonic–photonic modes, J. Phys. Chem. C122, 15853 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Semenov and A

    A. Semenov and A. Nitzan, Electron transfer in confined elec- tromagnetic fields, J. Chem. Phys.150, 174122 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Krainova, A

    N. Krainova, A. J. Grede, D. Tsokkou, N. Banerji, and N. C. Giebink, Polaron photoconductivity in the weak and strong light-matter coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 177401 (2020)

    2020

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    Nagarajan, J

    K. Nagarajan, J. George, A. Thomas, E. Devaux, T. Chervy, S. Azzini, K. Joseph, A. Jouaiti, M. W. Hosseini, A. Ku- mar,et al., Conductivity and photoconductivity of a p-type or- ganic semiconductor under ultrastrong coupling, ACS Nano14, 10219 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    M. Wang, M. Hertzog, and K. B ¨orjesson, Polariton-assisted excitation energy channeling in organic heterojunctions, Nat. Commun.12, 1874 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Thomas, J

    A. Thomas, J. George, A. Shalabney, M. Dryzhakov, S. J. Varma, J. Moran, T. Chervy, X. Zhong, E. Devaux, C. Genet, et al., Ground-state chemical reactivity under vibrational cou- pling to the vacuum electromagnetic field, Angew. Chem.128, 11634 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Thomas, L

    A. Thomas, L. Lethuillier-Karl, K. Nagarajan, R. M. A. Vergauwe, J. George, T. Chervy, A. Shalabney, E. Devaux, C. Genet, J. Moran,et al., Tilting a ground-state reactivity land- scape by vibrational strong coupling, Science363, 615 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Lather, P

    J. Lather, P. Bhatt, A. Thomas, T. W. Ebbesen, and J. George, Cavity catalysis by cooperative vibrational strong coupling of reactant and solvent molecules, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58, 10635 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    R. M. A. Vergauwe, A. Thomas, K. Nagarajan, A. Shalabney, J. George, T. Chervy, M. Seidel, E. Devaux, V . Torbeev, and T. W. Ebbesen, Modification of enzyme activity by vibrational strong coupling of water, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58, 15324 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    W. Ahn, J. F. Triana, F. Recabal, F. Herrera, and B. S. Simp- kins, Modification of ground-state chemical reactivity via light– matter coherence in infrared cavities, Science380, 1165 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    E. T. Jaynes and F. W. Cummings, Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser, Proc. IEEE51, 89 (1963)

    1963

  9. [17]

    T. W. Ebbesen, Hybrid light–matter states in a molecular and material science perspective, Acc. Chem. Res.49, 2403 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    R. F. Ribeiro, L. A. Mart ´ınez-Mart´ınez, M. Du, J. Campos- Gonzalez-Angulo, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Polariton chemistry: con- trolling molecular dynamics with optical cavities, Chem. Sci.9, 6325 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    Brune, F

    M. Brune, F. Schmidt-Kaler, A. Maali, J. Dreyer, E. Hagley, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Quantum rabi oscillation: A direct test of field quantization in a cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 1800 (1996)

    1996

  12. [20]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Kaiser, C

    M. Kaiser, C. Glaser, L. Y . Ley, J. Grimmel, H. Hattermann, D. Bothner, D. Koelle, R. Kleiner, D. Petrosyan, A. G ¨unther, et al., Cavity-driven rabi oscillations between rydberg states of atoms trapped on a superconducting atom chip, Phys. Rev. Re- search4, 013207 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Gea-Banacloche, Collapse and revival of the state vector in the jaynes-cummings model: An example of state preparation by a quantum apparatus, Phys

    J. Gea-Banacloche, Collapse and revival of the state vector in the jaynes-cummings model: An example of state preparation by a quantum apparatus, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 3385 (1990)

    1990

  15. [23]

    Hunanyan, J

    G. Hunanyan, J. Koch, S. Moll, E. Rico, E. Solano, and M. Weitz, Periodic quantum rabi model with cold atoms at deep strong coupling, Phys. Rev. Research6, 033023 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    E. S. Redchenko, M. Zens, M. ˇZemliˇcka, M. Peruzzo, F. Has- sani, R. Sett, P. Zieli ´nski, H. S. Dhar, D. O. Krimer, S. Rotter, J. M. Fink,et al., Observation of collapse and revival in a su- perconducting atomic frequency comb, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 063601 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Zou, X.-Y

    F. Zou, X.-Y . Zhang, X.-W. Xu, J.-F. Huang, and J.-Q. Liao, Multiphoton blockade in the two-photon jaynes-cummings model, Phys. Rev. A102, 053710 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Li, L.-B

    H.-J. Li, L.-B. Fan, S. Ma, J.-Q. Liao, and C.-C. Shu, Exploring photon blockade in a two-photon jaynes-cummings model with atom and cavity drivings, Phys. Rev. A110, 043707 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    A. D. Greentree, C. Tahan, J. H. Cole, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, Quantum phase transitions of light, Nat. Phys.2, 856 (2006)

    2006

  20. [28]

    Liu and J.-F

    C. Liu and J.-F. Huang, Quantum phase transition of the jaynes- cummings model, Sci. China: Phys., Mech. Astron.67, 210311 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Coulson, G

    C. Coulson, G. Christmann, P. Cristofolini, C. Grossmann, J. J. Baumberg, S. I. Tsintzos, G. Konstantinidis, Z. Hatzopoulos, and P. G. Savvidis, Electrically controlled strong coupling and polariton bistability in double quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B87, 045311 (2013). 10

    2013

  22. [30]

    Hertzog, P

    M. Hertzog, P. Rudquist, J. A. Hutchison, J. George, T. W. Ebbesen, and K. B ¨orjesson, V oltage-controlled switching of strong light–matter interactions using liquid crystals, Chem. Eur. J.23, 18166 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Xiang, R

    B. Xiang, R. F. Ribeiro, Y . Li, A. D. Dunkelberger, B. B. Simp- kins, J. Yuen-Zhou, and W. Xiong, Manipulating optical non- linearities of molecular polaritons by delocalization, Sci. Adv. 5, eaax5196 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    Galego, C

    J. Galego, C. Climent, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and J. Feist, Cavity casimir-polder forces and their effects in ground-state chemical reactivity, Phys. Rev. X9, 021057 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Y . Gu, B. Gu, S. Sun, H. Yong, V . Y . Chernyak, and S. Mukamel, Manipulating attosecond charge migration in molecules by optical cavities, J. Am. Chem. Soc.145, 14856 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Xiang and W

    B. Xiang and W. Xiong, Molecular polaritons for chemistry, photonics and quantum technologies, Chem. Rev.124, 2512 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Mondal, C

    A. Mondal, C. Biswas, P. Ghising, B. H. Moon, K. K. Kim, and Y . H. Lee, Switching polariton screening in mos2 microcavity toward polaritonics, Sci. Adv.11, eadr7202 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Fan, C.-C

    L.-B. Fan, C.-C. Shu, D. Dong, J. He, N. E. Henriksen, and F. Nori, Quantum Coherent Control of a Single Molecular- Polariton Rotation, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 043604 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Fan and C.-C

    L.-B. Fan and C.-C. Shu, Pulse-area theorem for precision con- trol of the rotational motions of a single molecule in a cavity, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.56, 365302 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Y . Guo, X. Gong, S. Ma, and C.-C. Shu, Cyclic three-level- pulse-area theorem for enantioselective state transfer of chiral molecules, Phys. Rev. A105, 013102 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Hong, Z.-Z

    Q.-Q. Hong, Z.-Z. Lian, C.-C. Shu, and N. E. Henriksen, Quan- tum control of field-free molecular orientation, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.25, 32763 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Assion, T

    A. Assion, T. Baumert, M. Bergt, T. Brixner, B. Kiefer, V . Seyfried, M. Strehle, and G. Gerber, Control of chemical re- actions by feedback-optimized phase-shaped femtosecond laser pulses, Science282, 919 (1998)

    1998

  33. [41]

    Daniel, J

    C. Daniel, J. Full, L. Gonz ´alez, C. Lupulescu, J. Manz, A. Merli, S. Vajda, and L. W ¨oste, Deciphering the reaction dynamics underlying optimal control laser fields, Science299, 536 (2003)

    2003

  34. [42]

    Wilma, C.-C

    K. Wilma, C.-C. Shu, U. Scherf, and R. Hildner, Visualizing hidden ultrafast processes in individual molecules by single- pulse coherent control, J. Am. Chem. Soc.140, 15329 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Guo, C.-C

    Y . Guo, C.-C. Shu, D. Dong, and F. Nori, Vanishing and revival of resonance raman scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 223202 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    Nandi, E

    S. Nandi, E. Olofsson, M. Bertolino, S. Carlstr ¨om, F. Zapata, D. Busto, C. Callegari, M. Di Fraia, P. Eng-Johnsson, R. Feifel, et al., Observation of rabi dynamics with a short-wavelength free-electron laser, Nature608, 488 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    Jing, Z.-P

    W.-Q. Jing, Z.-P. Sun, S.-F. Zhao, and C.-C. Shu, Unveiling co- herent control of halomethane dissociation induced by a single strong ultraviolet pulse, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.14, 11305 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Liu, J.-Q

    Y . Liu, J.-Q. Meng, Z. Sun, and C.-C. Shu, Unveiling ultrafast- weak-field coherent control of indirect dissociation reactions, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.15, 8393 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Richter, U

    F. Richter, U. Saalmann, E. Allaria, M. Wollenhaupt, B. Ardini, A. Brynes, C. Callegari, G. Cerullo, M. Danailov, A. Demi- dovich,et al., Strong-field quantum control in the extreme ul- traviolet domain using pulse shaping, Nature636, 337 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Meron, S

    O. Meron, S. Nehemia, U. Arieli, and H. Suchowski, Shaping ultrafast pulses for enhanced resonant nonlinear interactions, Nano Lett.25, 16614 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    Yang, W.-Q

    A. Yang, W.-Q. Jing, B.-S. Zhang, L.-B. Fan, L. Jia, and C.-C. Shu, Spectral phase control of an ultrashort pulse for exploring the autler-townes effect in hydrogen atomic ionization through a resonant state, Phys. Rev. A112, 053116 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, J

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg,Atom- Photon Interactions: Basic Processes and Applications(John Wiley & Sons, 1998)

    1998

  43. [51]

    Flick, M

    J. Flick, M. Ruggenthaler, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, Atoms and molecules in cavities, from weak to strong coupling in quantum-electrodynamics (qed) chemistry, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.114, 3026 (2017)

    2017

  44. [52]

    Rokaj, D

    V . Rokaj, D. M. Welakuh, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Ru- bio, Light–matter interaction in the long-wavelength limit: no ground-state without dipole self-energy, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.51, 034005 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    Sch ¨afer, M

    C. Sch ¨afer, M. Ruggenthaler, V . Rokaj, and A. Rubio Relevance of the quadratic diamagnetic and self-polarization terms in cav- ity quantum electrodynamics, ACS photonics7, 975 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    Szidarovszky, An efficient and flexible approach for comput- ing rovibrational polaritons from first principles, J

    T. Szidarovszky, An efficient and flexible approach for comput- ing rovibrational polaritons from first principles, J. Chem. Phys. 159, 014112 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Fan, H.-J

    L.-B. Fan, H.-J. Li, Q. Chen, H. Zhou, H. Liu, and C.-C. Shu, Maximizing orientation of a three-state molecule in a cavity with analytically designed pulses, Phys. Rev. A111, 033119 (2025)

    2025

  48. [56]

    Shu, Q.-Q

    C.-C. Shu, Q.-Q. Hong, Y . Guo, and N. E. Henriksen, Orien- tational quantum revivals induced by a single-cycle terahertz pulse, Phys. Rev. A102, 063124 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    Hong, L.-B

    Q.-Q. Hong, L.-B. Fan, C.-C. Shu, and N. E. Henriksen, Gen- eration of maximal three-state field-free molecular orientation with terahertz pulses, Phys. Rev. A104, 013108 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    Shu, T.-S

    C.-C. Shu, T.-S. Ho, and H. Rabitz, Monotonic convergent quantum optimal control method with exact equality constraints on the optimized control fields, Phys. Rev. A93, 053418 (2016)

    2016

  51. [59]

    Shu, T.-S

    C.-C. Shu, T.-S. Ho, X. Xing, and H. Rabitz, Frequency domain quantum optimal control under multiple constraints, Phys. Rev. A93, 033417 (2016)

    2016

  52. [60]

    Van Damme, Q

    L. Van Damme, Q. Ansel, S. J. Glaser, and D. Sugny, Robust optimal control of two-level quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A95, 063403 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    C. P. Koch, U. Boscain, T. Calarco, G. Dirr, S. Filipp, S. J. Glaser, R. Kosloff, S. Montangero, T. Schulte-Herbr ¨uggen, D. Sugny,et al., Quantum optimal control in quantum tech- nologies. strategic report on current status, visions and goals for research in europe, EPJ Quant...

    2022

  54. [62]

    Q.-Q. Hong, D. Dong, N. E. Henriksen, F. Nori, J. He, and C.- C. Shu, Precise quantum control of molecular rotation toward a desired orientation, Phys. Rev. Research7, L012049 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.