Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 7 cited by

Highly reflective white clouds on the western dayside of an exo-Neptune

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The ultra-hot Neptune LTT 9779b reflects starlight twice as strongly from its western dayside as from its eastern dayside, a 3.1σ asymmetry that the authors attribute to silicate clouds condensing on the cooler western hemisphere.

desk verdict First phase-resolved reflected-light map of an ultra-hot Neptune, worth reviewing despite a 3.1σ asymmetry that needs an injection-recovery check. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14016 v1 pith:P7QTLEFM submitted 2025-01-23 astro-ph.EP

classification astro-ph.EP
keywords exoplanetphasecurveultra-hotNeptunereflectedlightspectroscopygeometricalbedoatmosphericcirculationsilicatecloudsJWSTNIRISS/SOSSLTT9779b
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses a full-orbit JWST phase curve of the ultra-hot Neptune LTT 9779b, spanning 0.6 to 2.8 µm, to separate reflected starlight from thermal emission at six orbital phases. The central result is an asymmetric dayside in reflected light: the western dayside has an albedo of A = 0.79 ± 0.15 while the eastern dayside has A = 0.41 ± 0.10, an east-west contrast significant at 3.1σ. The thermal emission, by contrast, is symmetric about the substellar point, with a dayside effective temperature of 2,260 K and a nightside below 1,330 K. The authors interpret the pattern as a circulation regime in which an eastward equatorial jet advects heat away from the western dayside, allowing silicate clouds to condense there. If correct, this gives a direct look at how clouds and circulation couple in a high-metallicity, highly-irradiated planet smaller than a hot Jupiter.

What carries the argument

The analysis rests on a six-slice longitudinal model of the planet, in which each 60-degree slice carries its own albedo and thermal-emission value, convolved with analytic reflected-light and thermal visibility kernels. Stellar granulation is treated with a Gaussian process using a simple harmonic oscillator kernel, fit to the white light curve at wavelengths below 1 µm where reflected light dominates, and then scaled to each spectroscopic bin. Phase-resolved spectra at six orbital phases are retrieved with a free-temperature, chemical-equilibrium atmospheric model that simultaneously fits achromatic reflected light and thermal emission, letting the authors map albedo and effective temperature as functions of sub-observer longitude. The albedo asymmetry is also verified directly at the light-curve level by fitting albedo slices to the summed λ < 0.85 µm light curve.

What would settle it

Re-fit the summed λ < 0.85 µm light curve using the same instrument systematics but without the Gaussian-process granulation model (or with an independent reduction pipeline), and check whether the western-minus-eastern dayside flux difference stays above 3σ; if the contrast shrinks below significance, the asymmetry is an artifact of the detrending.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

LTT 9779b, a 29.3-Earth-mass ultra-hot Neptune orbiting a G7 star every 0.79 days, reflects starlight unevenly across its dayside. The western dayside is nearly twice as reflective as the eastern dayside (A = 0.79 ± 0.15 versus A = 0.41 ± 0.10), with a disk-averaged dayside geometric albedo of A = 0.50 ± 0.07 and a Bond albedo of 0.31 ± 0.06. The reflected-light phase curve peaks westward of the substellar point by up to 55 degrees at short wavelengths, while the thermal phase curve is centered on the substellar point with a dayside effective temperature of 2,260 K and a 3σ nightside upper limit of 1,330 K. The authors argue that this combination—bright, cloudy west; dimmer, clearer east; symmetric heat distribution—is the signature of a superrotating equatorial jet that transports heat eastward, cooling the western hemisphere below the condensation temperature of silicate clouds such as MgSiO3 and Mg2SiO4.

Load-bearing premise

The detection hinges on the assumption that the Gaussian-process and systematics model removes stellar granulation without also absorbing part of the phase-resolved planetary signal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • LTT 9779b becomes the first ultra-hot Neptune with a phase-resolved map of reflected light and temperature, showing that such planets can carry bright, patchy cloud decks rather than being uniformly dark.
  • The measured Bond albedo of 0.31 ± 0.06 implies that about a third of the incident stellar flux is reflected, so energy budget calculations for hot Neptunes should not assume near-total absorption.
  • The flat transmission spectrum of LTT 9779b can be explained by clouds hovering near the terminator, without requiring an especially high mean molecular weight.
  • The westward optical phase-curve offset and symmetric infrared phase curve provide a template for interpreting reflected-light and thermal phase curves of other highly irradiated small giants.
  • Water absorption on the dayside, combined with the albedo map, supports thermal-emission spectroscopy as a practical way to probe cloudy exoplanet atmospheres.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the cloud-contrast mechanism is general, other ultra-hot Neptunes and low-gravity hot Jupiters should show similar wavelength-dependent phase-curve offsets, with the westward reflectance peak growing as equilibrium temperature approaches the silicate condensation window.
  • The authors' retrieval found a low water abundance that conflicts with the mass–metallicity trend; one testable extension would be a high-resolution ground-based search for CO at 2.3 µm or 4.5 µm to break the C/O degeneracy and decide between a genuinely sub-solar H2O and an artifact of cloud inhomogeneity.
  • A single full-orbit observation cannot separate the east-west albedo contrast from a possible phase-angle dependence of the cloud scattering; a second epoch or a different viewing geometry (e.g., a more inclined orbit) would test whether the asymmetry is fixed in longitude or a scattering phase function effect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents JWST NIRISS/SOSS phase-curve observations of the ultra-hot Neptune LTT 9779b from 0.6 to 2.8 microns, covering two secondary eclipses and one primary transit. The authors use a six-longitudinal-slice model with separate reflected-light and thermal-emission kernels, a Gaussian-process model for stellar granulation, and a principal-component/instrumental systematics model. They report a reflected-light phase curve whose maximum is offset to the west at short wavelengths, an east-west dayside albedo asymmetry (A_west = 0.79 +/- 0.15 versus A_east = 0.41 +/- 0.10), an overall dayside albedo of 0.50 +/- 0.07, a symmetric thermal phase curve with dayside effective temperature 2260 K and a cold nightside, and an interpretation in which an eastward equatorial jet cools the western dayside enough for MgSiO3/Mg2SiO4 clouds to condense. The reflected-light asymmetry is quoted at 3.1-sigma significance at the light-curve level.

Significance. If the reflected-light asymmetry and high albedo hold up, this is a significant result: it would be one of the first phase-resolved reflected-light maps of a hot Neptune, with direct implications for cloud distribution, atmospheric circulation, and energy balance in the hot-Neptune desert. The paper benefits from full-orbit JWST spectroscopy, publicly available data and code, consistency checks against CHEOPS/TESS/Spitzer photometry, and cross-checks between equilibrium-chemistry and free-chemistry retrievals. The central claim, however, depends on separating a ~100 ppm phase-resolved planetary signal from a Gaussian-process granulation model and instrumental systematics; this separation is the main correctness risk.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods: Light Curve Fitting; Extended Data Fig. 5] The 3.1-sigma asymmetry claim rests on the separation of the phase curve from the Gaussian-process granulation model and instrumental systematics. The manuscript states that a simultaneous fit of reflected light, thermal emission, and the GP to the white-light curve drives the phase-curve solution to negative planetary flux after transit, forcing the white-light fit to be restricted to reflected light only. Because the SHO kernel in Eq. (8) with Q = 1/sqrt(2) has finite power at zero frequency, the GP can absorb orbit-timescale variations, and the same GP (scaled by m_gran) is applied to all spectroscopic bins and to the lambda<0.85 micron significance test. No injection-recovery test is presented to show that the GP/systematics model does not absorb part of the true phase curve or that the recovered east-west contrast is unbiased. Please add an injection-recovery test: inject synthetic phase curves with the claimed western offset and contrast into the actual time sampling and noise realization, run the same fitting pipeline, and report the recovered offset/contrast and the fraction of injected signal absorbed by the GP.
  2. [Methods: Light Curve Fitting] The quoted 3.1-sigma significance is the fraction (99.8%) of posterior samples with western-minus-eastern reflected flux greater than zero under a freely fitted six-albedo-slice model. This is a posterior probability statement, not a model comparison against a null hypothesis with no asymmetry, and the GP is included in that null. To make the detection claim robust, please report a proper significance measure (for example, a Bayesian evidence comparison or an injection-based false-positive rate) and show the null distribution of the west-east flux difference obtained from many symmetric injected signals processed through the same pipeline.
  3. [Atmospheric Analysis; Fig. 3c] The quantitative albedo values A_west = 0.79 +/- 0.15 and A_east = 0.41 +/- 0.10 are derived under a Lambertian phase function in the slice model and an achromatic albedo in the SCARLET retrievals, with the cloud-top pressure unconstrained (Methods, Atmospheric Analysis). The east-west contrast itself is a light-curve-level observable, but the specific albedo values and the 'white clouds' interpretation depend on these assumptions. Please state this model dependence explicitly in the abstract or main text, and consider a sensitivity test with a non-Lambertian scattering phase function to show how the albedo contrast and the inferred cloud composition would change.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Methods: Light Curve Fitting] In the paragraph describing the phase-resolved spectra, the text refers to 'eq. (8)' when extracting the phase-resolved spectra, but Eq. (8) is the Gaussian-process power spectral density; the relevant equation for the planetary flux is Eq. (3). Please correct the cross-reference.
  2. [Methods: Light Curve Fitting] In the significance test paragraph, 'see Fig. 7' should be 'see Extended Data Fig. 7' (or the figure reference should be corrected).
  3. [Methods: NIRISS/SOSS Reduction] The sentence 'We scale each column individually' begins with an uppercase 'We' mid-sentence; please fix the capitalization for consistency.
  4. [Methods: Atmospheric Analysis] The 1.65 micron bin is excluded from the atmospheric retrievals because of a suspected bad pixel, but it is unclear whether this bin is also excluded from the phase-curve amplitude and offset spectra in Fig. 1; please clarify.
  5. [Abstract / Main Text] The abstract states the asymmetry significance as 3.1 sigma without noting that this is a posterior probability statement; adding a brief caveat ('at the light-curve level, under the adopted noise model') would help readers gauge the robustness of the detection.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the east-west albedo asymmetry is measured from six-slice phase-curve fits and cross-checked with forward cloud models, not derived from an assumption of the result.

full rationale

The central claim of an asymmetric dayside in reflected light is quantified in Methods (Light Curve Analysis and Extended Data Fig. 5) by fitting six albedo slices to the lambda < 0.85 micron light curve and computing the posterior of the western-minus-eastern dayside flux. No fitted parameter is defined in terms of the claimed asymmetry, so the 3.1 sigma result does not reduce to an input by construction. The phase-resolved albedo values in Fig. 3c are obtained from atmospheric retrievals of measured phase-resolved spectra, converted to albedo via a Lambertian visibility/illumination integral, which is a bookkeeping conversion rather than an assumed outcome. The cloud interpretation uses VIRGA/PICASO forward models with a retrieval-based T-P profile and identifies MgSiO3 and Mg2SiO4 as the species best matching the high albedo; this is a model comparison, not a circular derivation. The Gaussian-process and systematics treatment is a modeling assumption with cross-checks (free chemistry, different phase-curve fits); a possible GP absorption of phase signal would be a bias or correctness concern, not circularity, because no equation in the paper makes the claimed result equal to the GP or systematics model. Self-citations are to standard pipeline and retrieval software and previously published observational results; none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for the asymmetry. No circular step meeting the quoted-reduction standard was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small number of fitted parameters (per-slice albedos and thermal emissions, GP parameters) and domain assumptions about the planet's rotation, scattering law, and noise model. The most consequential free parameters are the per-slice albedos that directly produce the asymmetry map. No new physical entities are introduced; the 'white clouds' are an interpretation of the measured reflected light, not an independently evidenced new component.

free parameters (8)
  • Western dayside slice albedo A_west = 0.79 ± 0.15
    Retrieved from phase-resolved reflected light at phase 240 degrees; central to the asymmetry claim.
  • Eastern dayside slice albedo A_east = 0.41 ± 0.10
    Retrieved at phase 120 degrees; central to the asymmetry claim.
  • Overall dayside albedo A_day = 0.50 ± 0.07
    Combined dayside reflected light; a free parameter in the slice model, consistent with CHEOPS within 1.6 sigma.
  • Granulation amplitude agran = 93 ± 6 ppm
    Fitted in white-light curve; GP model absorbs correlated noise.
  • Granulation timescale tau_gran = 21 +3/-2 minutes
    Fitted; differs from predicted 3 minutes but within an order of magnitude.
  • Bond albedo in energy balance models AB = 0.4
    Chosen by hand to reproduce measured dayside temperature in the ref. 19 energy balance model.
  • Temperature profile smoothing hyperparameter sigma_s = 300 K/dex^2
    Chosen by hand as a compromise between flexibility and overfitting in the retrieval.
  • Cloud top pressure logPcloud = unconstrained (full prior range)
    Fitted in retrieval but completely unconstrained, indicating degeneracy with the T-P profile.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption LTT 9779b is on a circular orbit and synchronously rotating (zero eccentricity, rotation period equals orbital period).
    Adopted from ref. 3; used in all phase curve models. If eccentricity or non-synchronous rotation were present, the phase curve interpretation would change.
  • domain assumption The planet's surface scattering is Lambertian and the reflected light kernel follows Cowan et al. (2013) visibility and illumination integrals.
    Used in Eq. 3-6. Real scattering may be non-Lambertian, which could bias recovered albedo values.
  • domain assumption Stellar granulation can be described by a simple harmonic oscillator Gaussian process with Q = 1/sqrt(2) and that this GP does not absorb the planetary phase curve signal.
    GP treatment in Methods. If the GP mixes with planetary signal, the amplitude and offset spectra and albedo map could be biased.
  • domain assumption The six-longitudinal-slice parametrization adequately captures the planet's longitudinal albedo and temperature variation; no latitudinal variation is modeled.
    Eq. 3 assumes 6 slices of 60 degrees; latitudinal dependence is averaged out, potentially smoothing sharp cloud gradients at the terminator.
  • domain assumption Chemical equilibrium abundances from FastChem2 and the SCARLET retrieval assumptions are valid for this atmosphere.
    Used in atmospheric retrievals; free chemistry retrievals give consistent results for the main quantities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Highly reflective white clouds on the western dayside of an exo-Neptune." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P7QTLEFM

@misc{pith2026250114016,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Highly reflective white clouds on the western dayside of an exo-Neptune},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P7QTLEFM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14016}
}
abstract

Highly-irradiated gas giant exoplanets are predicted to show circulation patterns dominated by day-to-night heat transport and a spatial distribution of clouds that is driven by advection and local heating. Hot-Jupiters have been extensively studied from broadband phase-curve observations at infrared and optical wavelengths, but spectroscopic observations in the reflected light are rare and the regime of smaller and higher-metallicity ultra-hot planets, such as hot-Neptunes, remains largely unexplored to date. Here we present the phase-resolved reflected-light and thermal-emission spectroscopy of the ultra-hot Neptune LTT 9779b, obtained through observing its full phase-curve from 0.6 to 2.8 $\mu$m with JWST NIRISS/SOSS. We detect an asymmetric dayside in reflected light (3.1$\sigma$ significance) with highly-reflective white clouds on the western dayside (A = 0.79$\pm$0.15) and a much lower-albedo eastern dayside (A = 0.41$\pm$0.10), resulting in an overall dayside albedo of A = 0.50$\pm$0.07. The thermal phase curve is symmetric about the substellar point, with a dayside effective temperature of T$_\mathrm{eff,day}$ = 2,260$^{+40}_{-50}$ K and a cold nightside (T$_\mathrm{eff,night}$ <1,330 K at 3-$\sigma$ confidence), indicative of short radiative timescales. We propose an atmospheric circulation and cloud distribution regime in which heat is transported eastward from the dayside towards the cold nightside by an equatorial jet, leading to a colder western dayside where temperatures are sufficiently low for the condensation of silicate clouds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Continuous helium absorption from the leading and trailing tails of WASP-107b

    astro-ph.EP 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Continuous JWST observations of WASP-107b reveal metastable helium absorption beginning 1.5 hours before ingress, evidence of an extended ellipsoidal thermosphere, with spot-corrected water abundance log10 H2O = -2.5 ± 0.6.

  2. Circular polarization as a probe of cloud properties and asymmetries in giant exoplanet atmospheres

    astro-ph.EP 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Circular polarization of starlight reflected by giant exoplanets is sensitive to cloud particle composition and atmospheric asymmetries, but the predicted signal is at most a few times 1e-4 of the planetary flux and b...

  3. Phase-dependent chemistry of WASP-43 b revealed with a suite of one-, two-, and three-dimensional models

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Horizontal quenching at wind speeds ≳500 m/s, plus carbon-sulfur chemistry, explains the MIRI non-detection of night-side methane on WASP-43 b without requiring high metallicity.

  4. A water-rich interior in the temperate sub-Neptune K2-18 b revealed by JWST

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    New JWST data robustly detect CH4 and CO2 in K2-18 b's atmosphere, indicating a water-rich interior; DMS, CH3SH, and N2O remain marginal, and abiotic organosulfur chemistry is a viable explanation.

  5. A High Geometric Albedo for LTT9779b Points Towards a Metal-rich Atmosphere and Silicate Clouds

    astro-ph.EP 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LTT9779b reflects roughly 73 percent of incident starlight in the optical, confirming an unusually high albedo for an ultrahot Neptune and supporting a metal-rich atmosphere with silicate clouds.

  6. Escaping Helium and a Highly Muted Spectrum Suggest a Metal-Enriched Atmosphere on Sub-Neptune GJ3090b from JWST Transit Spectroscopy

    astro-ph.EP 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    JWST transit spectroscopy of the sub-Neptune GJ 3090 b detects a weak helium signal and a muted infrared spectrum, indicating a metal-enriched atmosphere with >100x solar metallicity.

  7. JWST NIRISS Transmission Spectroscopy of the Super-Earth GJ 357b, a Favourable Target for Atmospheric Retention

    astro-ph.EP 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The first JWST transmission spectrum of GJ 357b is featureless, ruling out low-metallicity atmospheres up to about 100 times solar and motivating follow-up observations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Doyon, R. et al. The Near Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph for the James Webb Space Telescope. I. Instrument Overview and In-flight Performance. PASP 135, 098001 (2023). 2306.03277

  2. [2]

    leads the fit to prefer negative planetary flux values after transit. To avoid our phase curve fit reaching a nonphysical solution, we limit our parameter space by fitting the GP to the reflected light broadband light curve ( λ ≤1.0 µm), for which we do not fit the thermal component of our slice model. Because the reflected light component of the astrophy...

  3. [3]

    Albert, L. et al. The Near Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph for the James Webb Space Telescope. III. Single Object Slitless Spectroscopy.PASP135, 075001 (2023). 2306. 04572

  4. [4]

    Jenkins, J. S. et al. An ultrahot Neptune in the Neptune desert. Nature Astronomy 4, 1148– 1157 (2020). 2009.12832

  5. [5]

    Szab ´o, G. M. & Kiss, L. L. A Short-period Censor of Sub-Jupiter Mass Exoplanets with Low Density. ApJL 727, L44 (2011). 1012.4791

  6. [6]

    & Faigler, S

    Mazeh, T., Holczer, T. & Faigler, S. Dearth of short-period Neptunian exoplanets: A desert in period-mass and period-radius planes. A&A 589, A75 (2016). 1602.07843

  7. [7]

    Coulombe, L.-P. et al. A broadband thermal emission spectrum of the ultra-hot Jupiter W ASP-18b.Nature 620, 292–298 (2023). 2301.08192

  8. [8]

    Feinstein, A. D. et al. Early Release Science of the exoplanet W ASP-39b with JWST NIRISS. Nature 614, 670–675 (2023). 2211.10493

Show all 105 references
  1. [9]

    Radica, M. et al. Awesome SOSS: transmission spectroscopy of W ASP-96b with NIRISS/SOSS. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 524, 835–856 (2023). 2305.17001

  2. [10]

    Lim, O. et al. Atmospheric Reconnaissance of TRAPPIST-1 b with JWST/NIRISS: Evidence for Strong Stellar Contamination in the Transmission Spectra.ApJL 955, L22 (2023). 2309. 07047

  3. [11]

    Radica, M. et al. Muted Features in the JWST NIRISS Transmission Spectrum of Hot Nep- tune LTT 9779b. ApJL 962, L20 (2024). 2401.15548

  4. [12]

    Rigby, J. et al. The Science Performance of JWST as Characterized in Commissioning.PASP 135, 048001 (2023). 2207.05632

  5. [13]

    Alderson, L. et al. Early Release Science of the exoplanet W ASP-39b with JWST NIRSpec G395H. Nature 614, 664–669 (2023). 2211.10488

  6. [14]

    Gilliland, R. L. et al. Kepler mission stellar and instrument noise properties. The Astrophys- ical Journal Supplement Series 197, 6 (2011). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 0067-0049/197/1/6

  7. [15]

    Kallinger, T. et al. The connection between stellar granulation and oscillation as seen by the Kepler mission. A&A 570, A41 (2014). 1408.0817. 11

  8. [16]

    A., Huber, D

    Kallinger, T., Hekker, S., Garcia, R. A., Huber, D. & Matthews, J. M. Precise stellar surface gravities from the time scales of convectively driven brightness variations.Science Advances 2, 1500654 (2016)

  9. [17]

    High-Resolution Helioseismology

    Harvey, J. High-Resolution Helioseismology. In Rolfe, E. & Battrick, B. (eds.) Future Mis- sions in Solar, Heliospheric & Space Plasma Physics , vol. 235 of ESA Special Publication, 199 (1985)

  10. [18]

    Michel, E. et al. Intrinsic photometric characterisation of stellar oscillations and granula- tion: Solar reference values and corot response functions. Astronomy &; Astrophysics 495, 979–987 (2009). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200810353

  11. [19]

    Dragomir, D. et al. Spitzer Reveals Evidence of Molecular Absorption in the Atmosphere of the Hot Neptune LTT 9779b. ApJL 903, L6 (2020). 2010.12744

  12. [20]

    Crossfield, I. J. M. et al. Phase Curves of Hot Neptune LTT 9779b Suggest a High-metallicity Atmosphere. ApJL 903, L7 (2020). 2010.12745

  13. [21]

    Hoyer, S. et al. The extremely high albedo of LTT 9779 b revealed by CHEOPS. An ultrahot Neptune with a highly metallic atmosphere. A&A 675, A81 (2023)

  14. [22]

    S., Gelino, C., Stephens, D., Lunine, J

    Marley, M. S., Gelino, C., Stephens, D., Lunine, J. I. & Freedman, R. Reflected spectra and albedos of extrasolar giant planets. i. clear and cloudy atmospheres. The Astrophysical Journal 513, 879–893 (1999). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/306881

  15. [23]

    Demory, B.-O. et al. Inference of Inhomogeneous Clouds in an Exoplanet Atmosphere.ApJL 776, L25 (2013). 1309.7894

  16. [24]

    Parmentier, V ., Showman, A. P. & Lian, Y . 3d mixing in hot jupiters atmospheres: I. applica- tion to the day/night cold trap in hd 209458b. Astronomy &; Astrophysics 558, A91 (2013). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321132

  17. [25]

    Shporer, A. & Hu, R. Studying atmosphere-dominated hot jupiterkeplerphase curves: Ev- idence that inhomogeneous atmospheric reflection is common. The Astronomical Journal 150, 112 (2015). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/150/4/112

  18. [26]

    J., Showman, A

    Parmentier, V ., Fortney, J. J., Showman, A. P., Morley, C. & Marley, M. S. Transitions in the Cloud Composition of Hot Jupiters. ApJ 828, 22 (2016). 1602.03088

  19. [27]

    Parmentier, V ., Showman, A. P. & Fortney, J. J. The cloudy shape of hot jupiter thermal phase curves. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 501, 78–108 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fmnras%2Fstaa3418

  20. [28]

    & Seager, S

    Benneke, B. & Seager, S. Atmospheric Retrieval for Super-Earths: Uniquely Constrain- ing the Atmospheric Composition with Transmission Spectroscopy. ApJ 753, 100 (2012). 1203.4018. 12

  21. [29]

    & Seager, S

    Benneke, B. & Seager, S. How to Distinguish between Cloudy Mini-Neptunes and Water/V olatile-dominated Super-Earths.ApJ 778, 153 (2013). 1306.6325

  22. [30]

    Strict Upper Limits on the Carbon-to-Oxygen Ratios of Eight Hot Jupiters from Self-Consistent Atmospheric Retrieval

    Benneke, B. Strict Upper Limits on the Carbon-to-Oxygen Ratios of Eight Hot Jupiters from Self-Consistent Atmospheric Retrieval. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1504.07655 (2015). 1504. 07655

  23. [31]

    Benneke, B. et al. A sub-Neptune exoplanet with a low-metallicity methane-depleted atmo- sphere and Mie-scattering clouds. Nature Astronomy 3, 813–821 (2019). 1907.00449

  24. [32]

    B., Fuentes, P

    Cowan, N. B., Fuentes, P. A. & Haggard, H. M. Light curves of stars and exoplanets: esti- mating inclination, obliquity and albedo. MNRAS 434, 2465–2479 (2013). 1304.6398

  25. [33]

    51 pegasus b-like

    Showman, A. P. & Guillot, T. Atmospheric circulation and tides of “51 pegasus b-like” planets. Astronomy &; Astrophysics 385, 166–180 (2002). URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1051/0004-6361:20020101

  26. [34]

    Showman, A. P. et al. Atmospheric circulation of hot jupiters: Coupled radiative-dynamical general circulation model simulations of hd 189733b and hd 209458b. The Astrophysical Journal 699, 564–584 (2009). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/ 699/1/564

  27. [35]

    Lewis, N. K. et al. Atmospheric Circulation of Eccentric Hot Neptune GJ436b. ApJ 720, 344–356 (2010). 1007.2942

  28. [36]

    Komacek, T. D. & Showman, A. P. Atmospheric circulation of hot jupiters: Day- side–nightside temperature differences. The Astrophysical Journal 821, 16 (2016). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/16

  29. [37]

    Gao, P. et al. Aerosol composition of hot giant exoplanets dominated by silicates and hy- drocarbon hazes. Nature Astronomy 4, 951–956 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10. 1038%2Fs41550-020-1114-3

  30. [38]

    Wakeford, H. R. & Sing, D. K. Transmission spectral properties of clouds for hot Jupiter exoplanets. A&A 573, A122 (2015). 1409.7594

  31. [39]

    Wakeford, H. R. et al. High-temperature condensate clouds in super-hot jupiter atmospheres. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 464, 4247–4254 (2016). URL https: //doi.org/10.1093%2Fmnras%2Fstw2639

  32. [40]

    & Showman, A

    Zhang, X. & Showman, A. P. Effects of Bulk Composition on the Atmospheric Dynamics on Close-in Exoplanets. ApJ 836, 73 (2017). 1607.04260

  33. [42]

    & Rauscher, E

    Roman, M. & Rauscher, E. Modeled Temperature-dependent Clouds with Radiative Feed- back in Hot Jupiter Atmospheres. ApJ 872, 1 (2019). 1807.08890

  34. [43]

    Kreidberg, L. et al. A PRECISE W ATER ABUNDANCE MEASUREMENT FOR THE HOT JUPITER W ASP-43b. The Astrophysical Journal 793, L27 (2014). URL https: //doi.org/10.1088%2F2041-8205%2F793%2F2%2Fl27

  35. [44]

    Welbanks, L. et al. Mass–metallicity trends in transiting exoplanets from atmospheric abundances of h 2o, na, and k. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 887, L20 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.3847%2F2041-8213%2Fab5a89

  36. [45]

    & Fegley, B

    Visscher, C., Lodders, K. & Fegley, B. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY IN GIANT PLAN- ETS, BROWN DW ARFS, AND LOW-MASS DW ARF STARS. III. IRON, MAGNESIUM, AND SILICON. The Astrophysical Journal 716, 1060–1075 (2010). URL https: //doi.org/10.1088%2F0004-637x%2F716%2F2%2F1060

  37. [46]

    Wong, I. et al. Visible-light Phase Curves from the Second Year of the TESS Primary Mis- sion. AJ 162, 127 (2021). 2106.02610

  38. [47]

    Cowan, N. B. & Agol, E. THE STATISTICS OF ALBEDO AND HEAT RECIRCULATION ON HOT EXOPLANETS. The Astrophysical Journal 729, 54 (2011). URL https:// doi.org/10.1088%2F0004-637x%2F729%2F1%2F54

  39. [48]

    Edwards, B. et al. Characterizing a World Within the Hot-Neptune Desert: Transit Ob- servations of LTT 9779 b with the Hubble Space Telescope/WFC3. AJ 166, 158 (2023). 2306.13645

  40. [49]

    Kempton, E. M.-R. et al. A reflective, metal-rich atmosphere for gj 1214b from its jwst phase curve. Nature 620, 67–71 (2023). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-023-06159-5

  41. [50]

    Bushouse, H. et al. Jwst calibration pipeline (2023). URL https://doi.org/10. 5281/zenodo.8404029. If you use this software in your work, please cite it using the following metadata

  42. [51]

    Jwst user documentation (2022)

    STScI. Jwst user documentation (2022). URL https://jwst-docs.stsci.edu/

  43. [52]

    & Madhusudhan, N

    Holmberg, M. & Madhusudhan, N. Exoplanet spectroscopy with jwst niriss: diagnostics and case studies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 524, 377–402 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fmnras%2Fstad1580

  44. [53]

    Madhusudhan, N. et al. Carbon-bearing Molecules in a Possible Hycean Atmosphere. ApJL 956, L13 (2023). 2309.05566

  45. [54]

    Darveau-Bernier, A. et al. ATOCA: an Algorithm to Treat Order Contamination. Application to the NIRISS SOSS Mode. Publications of the Astronomical Soeicty of the Pacific 134, 094502 (2022). 2207.05199. 14

  46. [55]

    Radica, M. et al. APPLESOSS: A Producer of ProfiLEs for SOSS. Application to the NIRISS SOSS Mode. Publications of the Astronomical Soeicty of the Pacific 134, 104502 (2022). 2207.05136

  47. [56]

    Kipping, D. M. Efficient, uninformative sampling of limb darkening coefficients for two- parameter laws. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 435, 2152–2160 (2013). URL https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fmnras%2Fstt1435

  48. [57]

    The astrophysics of visible-light orbital phase curves in the space age

    Shporer, A. The astrophysics of visible-light orbital phase curves in the space age. Pub- lications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 129, 072001 (2017). URL https: //doi.org/10.1088%2F1538-3873%2Faa7112

  49. [58]

    Shporer, A. et al. TESS Full Orbital Phase Curve of the W ASP-18b System. AJ 157, 178 (2019). 1811.06020

  50. [59]

    Addison, B. C. et al. TOI-1431b/MASCARA-5b: A highly irradiated ultrahot jupiter orbiting one of the hottest and brightest known exoplanet host stars. The Astronomical Journal 162, 292 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.3847%2F1538-3881%2Fac224e

  51. [60]

    Bourque, M. et al. The exoplanet characterization toolkit (exoctk) (2021). URL https: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4556063

  52. [61]

    Limb and gravity-darkening coefficients for the TESS satellite at several metallici- ties, surface gravities, and microturbulent velocities

    Claret, A. Limb and gravity-darkening coefficients for the TESS satellite at several metallici- ties, surface gravities, and microturbulent velocities. A&A 600, A30 (2017). 1804.10295

  53. [62]

    Knutson, H. A. et al. A map of the day-night contrast of the extrasolar planet HD 189733b. Nature 447, 183–186 (2007). 0705.0993

  54. [63]

    Cowan, N. B. & Agol, E. Inverting Phase Functions to Map Exoplanets. ApJL 678, L129 (2008). 0803.3622

  55. [64]

    Grunblatt, S. K. et al. Seeing Double with K2: Testing Re-inflation with Two Remarkably Similar Planets around Red Giant Branch Stars. AJ 154, 254 (2017). 1706.05865

  56. [65]

    Barros, S. C. C. et al. Improving transit characterisation with gaussian process modelling of stellar variability. Astronomy & Astrophysics 634, A75 (2020). URL https://doi. org/10.1051%2F0004-6361%2F201936086

  57. [66]

    Chiavassa, A. et al. Measuring stellar granulation during planet transits. Astronomy & Astrophysics 597, A94 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1051%2F0004-6361% 2F201528018

  58. [67]

    & Deleuil, M

    Bruno, G. & Deleuil, M. Stellar activity and transits (2021). 2104.06173

  59. [68]

    & Pascale, E

    Sarkar, S., Argyriou, I., Vandenbussche, B., Papageorgiou, A. & Pascale, E. Stellar pulsa- tion and granulation as noise sources in exoplanet transit spectroscopy in the ARIEL space mission. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481, 2871–2877 (2018). URL https://d...

  60. [69]

    Pereira, F. et al. Gaussian process modelling of granulation and oscillations in red giant stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 489, 5764–5774 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fmnras%2Fstz2405

  61. [70]

    & Angus, R

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Agol, E., Ambikasaran, S. & Angus, R. Fast and Scalable Gaussian Process Modeling with Applications to Astronomical Time Series. AJ 154, 220 (2017). 1703.09710

  62. [71]

    W., Lang, D

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D. & Goodman, J. emcee: The MCMC hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 125, 306–312 (2013). URL https: //doi.org/10.1086%2F670067

  63. [72]

    Bell, K. L. & Berrington, K. A. Free-free absorption coefficient of the negative hydrogen ion. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular Physics 20, 801–806 (1987)

  64. [73]

    John, T. L. Continuous absorption by the negative hydrogen ion reconsidered. A&A 193, 189–192 (1988)

  65. [74]

    E., Kupka, F., Ryabchikova, T

    Piskunov, N. E., Kupka, F., Ryabchikova, T. A., Weiss, W. W. & Jeffery, C. S. V ALD: The Vienna Atomic Line Data Base. A&AS 112, 525 (1995)

  66. [75]

    & V olobuyev, M

    Burrows, A. & V olobuyev, M. Calculations of the Far-Wing Line Profiles of Sodium and Potassium in the Atmospheres of Substellar-Mass Objects. ApJ 583, 985–995 (2003). astro-ph/0210086

  67. [76]

    Polyansky, O. L. et al. ExoMol molecular line lists XXX: a complete high-accuracy line list for water. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 480, 2597–2608 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fmnras%2Fsty1877

  68. [77]

    Rothman, L. S. et al. HITEMP, the high-temperature molecular spectroscopic database. J. Quant. Spec. Radiat. Transf. 111, 2139–2150 (2010)

  69. [78]

    Yurchenko, S. N. & Tennyson, J. ExoMol line lists – IV. the rotation–vibration spectrum of methane up to 1500 k. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 440, 1649–1661 (2014). URL https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fmnras%2Fstu326

  70. [79]

    A., Yurchenko, S

    Coles, P. A., Yurchenko, S. N. & Tennyson, J. ExoMol molecular line lists - XXXV . A rotation-vibration line list for hot ammonia.MNRAS 490, 4638–4647 (2019). 1911.10369

  71. [80]

    Barber, R. J. et al. ExoMol line lists – III. an improved hot rotation-vibration line list for HCN and HNC. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society437, 1828–1835 (2013). URL https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fmnras%2Fstt2011

  72. [81]

    McKemmish, L. K. et al. ExoMol molecular line lists - XXXIII. The spectrum of Titanium Oxide. MNRAS 488, 2836–2854 (2019). 1905.04587. 16

  73. [82]

    K., Yurchenko, S

    McKemmish, L. K., Yurchenko, S. N. & Tennyson, J. ExoMol line lists - XVIII. The high- temperature spectrum of VO. MNRAS 463, 771–793 (2016). 1609.06120

  74. [83]

    & Bernath, P

    Wende, S., Reiners, A., Seifahrt, A. & Bernath, P. F. CRIRES spectroscopy and empiri- cal line-by-line identification of FeH molecular absorption in an m dwarf. Astronomy & Astrophysics 523, A58 (2010). URL https://doi.org/10.1051%2F0004-6361% 2F201015220

  75. [84]

    W., Kitzmann, D

    Stock, J. W., Kitzmann, D. & Patzer, A. B. C. FastChem2 : an improved computer program to determine the gas-phase chemical equilibrium composition for arbitrary element distribu- tions. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 517, 4070–4080 (2022). URL https://doi.or...

  76. [85]

    Pelletier, S. et al. Where is the water? jupiter-like c/h ratio but strong h2o depletion found on τ bo¨otis b using spirou. The Astronomical Journal 162, 73 (2021). URL http://dx. doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ac0428

  77. [86]

    & Mace, G

    Bazinet, L., Pelletier, S., Benneke, B., Salinas, R. & Mace, G. N. A Subsolar Metallicity on the Ultra-short-period Planet HIP 65Ab. AJ 167, 206 (2024). 2403.07983

  78. [87]

    & Selsis, F

    Ag ´undez, M., Parmentier, V ., Venot, O., Hersant, F. & Selsis, F. Pseudo 2D chemical model of hot-Jupiter atmospheres: application to HD 209458b and HD 189733b. A&A 564, A73 (2014). 1403.0121

  79. [88]

    P., Tan, X

    Showman, A. P., Tan, X. & Parmentier, V . Atmospheric dynamics of hot giant planets and brown dwarfs. Space Science Reviews 216 (2020). URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/s11214-020-00758-8

  80. [89]

    Bell, T. J. et al. Nightside clouds and disequilibrium chemistry on the hot Jupiter W ASP-43b. Nature Astronomy 8, 879–898 (2024). 2401.13027

  81. [90]

    P., Venot, O., Lagage, P.-O

    Rocchetto, M., Waldmann, I. P., Venot, O., Lagage, P.-O. & Tinetti, G. EXPLORING BIASES OF ATMOSPHERIC RETRIEV ALS IN SIMULATED JWST TRANSMISSION SPECTRA OF HOT JUPITERS. The Astrophysical Journal 833, 120 (2016). URL https://doi.org/10.3847%2F1538-4357%2F833%2F1%2F120

  82. [91]

    & Pavlov, H

    Mallama, A., Krobusek, B. & Pavlov, H. Comprehensive wide-band magnitudes and albedos for the planets, with applications to exo-planets and planet nine. Icarus 282, 19–33 (2017). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.09.023

  83. [92]

    A., Conrath, B

    Hanel, R. A., Conrath, B. J., Kunde, V . G., Pearl, J. C. & Pirraglia, J. A. Albedo, internal heat flux, and energy balance of Saturn. Icarus 53, 262–285 (1983)

  84. [93]

    C., Conrath, B

    Pearl, J. C., Conrath, B. J., Hanel, R. A., Pirraglia, J. A. & Coustenis, A. The albedo, effective temperature, and energy balance of Uranus, as determined from V oyager IRIS data. Icarus 84, 12–28 (1990). 17

  85. [94]

    Pearl, J. C. & Conrath, B. J. The albedo, effective temperature, and energy balance of Nep- tune, as determined from V oyager data.J. Geophys. Res. 96, 18921–18930 (1991)

  86. [95]

    M., Batalha, N

    Rooney, C. M., Batalha, N. E., Gao, P. & Marley, M. S. A new sedimentation model for greater cloud diversity in giant exoplanets and brown dwarfs. The Astrophysical Journal 925, 33 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Fac307a

  87. [96]

    E., Marley, M

    Batalha, N. E., Marley, M. S., Lewis, N. K. & Fortney, J. J. Exoplanet reflected-light spectroscopy with PICASO. The Astrophysical Journal 878, 70 (2019). URL https: //doi.org/10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Fab1b51

  88. [97]

    & Woitke, P

    Lee, E., Dobbs-Dixon, I., Helling, C., Bognar, K. & Woitke, P. Dynamic mineral clouds on hd 189733b: I. 3d rhd with kinetic, non-equilibrium cloud formation. Astronomy &; Astrophysics 594, A48 (2016). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 201628606

  89. [98]

    Lines, S. et al. Simulating the cloudy atmospheres of HD 209458 b and HD 189733 b with the 3D Met Office Unified Model. A&A 615, A97 (2018). 1803.00226

  90. [99]

    Grant, D. et al. JWST-TST DREAMS: Quartz Clouds in the Atmosphere of W ASP-17b. ApJL 956, L32 (2023). 2310.08637

  91. [100]

    I., Murray-Clay, R

    ¨Oberg, K. I., Murray-Clay, R. & Bergin, E. A. The effects of snowlines on c/o in planetary atmospheres. The Astrophysical Journal 743, L16 (2011). URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1088/2041-8205/743/1/L16

  92. [101]

    Madhusudhan, N., Amin, M. A. & Kennedy, G. M. Toward chemical constraints on hot jupiter migration. The Astrophysical Journal 794, L12 (2014). URL http://dx.doi. org/10.1088/2041-8205/794/1/L12

  93. [102]

    Taylor, J. et al. Awesome SOSS: atmospheric characterization of W ASP-96 b using the JWST early release observations. MNRAS 524, 817–834 (2023). 2305.16887

  94. [103]

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community- oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package

    Astropy Collaboration et al. The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community- oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package. ApJ 935, 167 (2022). 2206.14220

  95. [104]

    Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment. Computing in Science & Engineering 9, 90–95 (2007)

  96. [105]

    Harris, C. R. et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585, 357–362 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

  97. [106]

    Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods 17, 261–272 (2020). 18

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.